±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 457
Total: 457
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Downloads
02: Photo Gallery
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: CPGlang
07: Photo Gallery
08: Member Screenshots
09: CPGlang
10: Community Forums
11: Downloads
12: Home
13: Community Forums
14: Photo Gallery
15: CPGlang
16: Community Forums
17: Photo Gallery
18: Home
19: Photo Gallery
20: CPGlang
21: Photo Gallery
22: Community Forums
23: CPGlang
24: CPGlang
25: Community Forums
26: Photo Gallery
27: Community Forums
28: Downloads
29: Home
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: CPGlang
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: Community Forums
39: News Archive
40: Community Forums
41: Photo Gallery
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Home
47: Home
48: Community Forums
49: Member Screenshots
50: Photo Gallery
51: Photo Gallery
52: Photo Gallery
53: Community Forums
54: Home
55: Home
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: CPGlang
59: Your Account
60: CPGlang
61: Community Forums
62: CPGlang
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Home
69: Community Forums
70: Home
71: Community Forums
72: Photo Gallery
73: Home
74: Downloads
75: Community Forums
76: Downloads
77: Member Screenshots
78: CPGlang
79: Home
80: Photo Gallery
81: Community Forums
82: Photo Gallery
83: Home
84: Community Forums
85: Downloads
86: News
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: News Archive
90: Photo Gallery
91: Photo Gallery
92: Photo Gallery
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Home
96: Photo Gallery
97: Member Screenshots
98: Your Account
99: CPGlang
100: Member Screenshots
101: Community Forums
102: Photo Gallery
103: Community Forums
104: News Archive
105: Home
106: Community Forums
107: Photo Gallery
108: Member Screenshots
109: Community Forums
110: Your Account
111: Community Forums
112: CPGlang
113: Community Forums
114: Photo Gallery
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Community Forums
119: Photo Gallery
120: Home
121: Home
122: Photo Gallery
123: Member Screenshots
124: Community Forums
125: CPGlang
126: Downloads
127: Community Forums
128: Home
129: Community Forums
130: Member Screenshots
131: Home
132: Community Forums
133: Home
134: Community Forums
135: Photo Gallery
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: CPGlang
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Photo Gallery
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: CPGlang
153: Home
154: Downloads
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Home
158: Photo Gallery
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Home
163: Home
164: Community Forums
165: Home
166: Community Forums
167: Photo Gallery
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: News
172: Member Screenshots
173: Community Forums
174: Home
175: Home
176: Community Forums
177: Home
178: Community Forums
179: Home
180: Community Forums
181: Home
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Downloads
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: Community Forums
189: Home
190: Member Screenshots
191: Community Forums
192: Home
193: CPGlang
194: Community Forums
195: Home
196: Home
197: Member Screenshots
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Home
204: Community Forums
205: Downloads
206: Community Forums
207: Home
208: Community Forums
209: Photo Gallery
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Home
213: Home
214: Downloads
215: CPGlang
216: Home
217: Home
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Home
222: Community Forums
223: Photo Gallery
224: Community Forums
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Photo Gallery
231: Community Forums
232: Home
233: Community Forums
234: Home
235: Photo Gallery
236: Member Screenshots
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Photo Gallery
241: Community Forums
242: Photo Gallery
243: Community Forums
244: Community Forums
245: CPGlang
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: News Archive
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Downloads
255: Photo Gallery
256: Downloads
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Home
260: Home
261: Photo Gallery
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Photo Gallery
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Home
270: Community Forums
271: Home
272: CPGlang
273: Community Forums
274: News Archive
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Home
278: Community Forums
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Photo Gallery
282: Community Forums
283: Photo Gallery
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Home
287: Community Forums
288: Community Forums
289: Home
290: News
291: Community Forums
292: Community Forums
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Member Screenshots
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Photo Gallery
299: Photo Gallery
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Community Forums
303: Home
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Photo Gallery
307: Home
308: Community Forums
309: Home
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Photo Gallery
313: Home
314: Community Forums
315: Photo Gallery
316: Community Forums
317: Photo Gallery
318: CPGlang
319: Home
320: Community Forums
321: Downloads
322: Home
323: Community Forums
324: Home
325: Community Forums
326: Community Forums
327: Community Forums
328: Home
329: Photo Gallery
330: Member Screenshots
331: Community Forums
332: Home
333: Community Forums
334: Community Forums
335: News Archive
336: Photo Gallery
337: Home
338: Community Forums
339: Photo Gallery
340: Community Forums
341: Community Forums
342: Downloads
343: Home
344: Community Forums
345: News Archive
346: Community Forums
347: Photo Gallery
348: Home
349: CPGlang
350: Community Forums
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Community Forums
354: Community Forums
355: Home
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Community Forums
359: Photo Gallery
360: CPGlang
361: Home
362: Community Forums
363: Downloads
364: Photo Gallery
365: Community Forums
366: Community Forums
367: Photo Gallery
368: News
369: News
370: Member Screenshots
371: Home
372: Member Screenshots
373: Downloads
374: Community Forums
375: Home
376: Community Forums
377: Community Forums
378: Community Forums
379: Community Forums
380: Community Forums
381: Community Forums
382: Home
383: Home
384: Community Forums
385: Home
386: CPGlang
387: Community Forums
388: Community Forums
389: Photo Gallery
390: Home
391: CPGlang
392: Community Forums
393: Statistics
394: Member Screenshots
395: Downloads
396: Downloads
397: Member Screenshots
398: Your Account
399: Home
400: Community Forums
401: Member Screenshots
402: Community Forums
403: Home
404: Photo Gallery
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Community Forums
408: Home
409: Community Forums
410: CPGlang
411: Community Forums
412: Community Forums
413: Community Forums
414: Home
415: Downloads
416: Community Forums
417: Community Forums
418: Community Forums
419: Community Forums
420: Community Forums
421: Home
422: Home
423: Home
424: Home
425: Home
426: Community Forums
427: Home
428: Member Screenshots
429: Community Forums
430: Community Forums
431: CPGlang
432: Community Forums
433: Community Forums
434: Community Forums
435: Home
436: Photo Gallery
437: Community Forums
438: Community Forums
439: Downloads
440: Community Forums
441: Photo Gallery
442: Photo Gallery
443: Photo Gallery
444: Community Forums
445: CPGlang
446: Home
447: Community Forums
448: Home
449: Community Forums
450: Photo Gallery
451: Community Forums
452: Home
453: Community Forums
454: Downloads
455: Community Forums
456: Community Forums
457: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
XM 66 Tank Proposal
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:51 pm
Post subject: XM 66 Tank Proposal

This is a 'spin-off' Vehicle from the T95 Program.



Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:11 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Interesting - You say it was a spinoff of teh T95 program. Where does this fit in the M60A2 genisis? The picture looks like an M6A1E1 or M60A2. Could it be that the Army decided that it would be easier to get the program survive by either giving it a new designator (XM66) or developing it as a member of the M60 family

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
tanker2010
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: 264
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:30 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

It does have a strange hull. While it has the shape and fenders of a M60, it has 5 return rollers.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:37 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

The turret is similiar to the T95 test bed at the LST buiding.
(NOTE: The 20mm gun is removed, but mount location is obvious)





This is around the time of the M60A2 development.

Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:12 am
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

XM66 is the now known as M60A2 program.

That's a poor picture of M60 hull 9B4470 with the proposed "A" model turret. I think I posted a copy of it a while back.

In it's early stages the adaptation of the 152mm gun/launcher to the M60 was called the XM66. They reviewed 4 turret types, A, B, C, and D. "A" and "B" were similar compact types, with the "B" model being taller. The "C" model was very similar in appearance to an over grown M551 turret, and the "D" was a modified M60A1 turret with shorter rear. In early 1965 they changed the program name to M60A1E1. The "B" model ended up being selected and eventually became the M60A2.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Andrei
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Posts: 80

PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 3:19 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Interesting if any alternative armament options were considered for XM 66 or M60A2 at the initial development (60s), later they considered 120 mm US and British guns, as well as M68.
Back to top
View user's profile
Harold_Biondo
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2021
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2022 6:17 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

- Joe_D
XM66 is the now known as M60A2 program.

That's a poor picture of M60 hull 9B4470 with the proposed "A" model turret. I think I posted a copy of it a while back.

In it's early stages the adaptation of the 152mm gun/launcher to the M60 was called the XM66. They reviewed 4 turret types, A, B, C, and D. "A" and "B" were similar compact types, with the "B" model being taller. The "C" model was very similar in appearance to an over grown M551 turret, and the "D" was a modified M60A1 turret with shorter rear. In early 1965 they changed the program name to M60A1E1. The "B" model ended up being selected and eventually became the M60A2.


If this was referring to the tank that is in Armada Michigan, that is not in fact the XM66D (or A, in this case) turret, it is the T95S turret. S standing for Shillelagh. There was some cross-pollination going on between the M60A2 and T95 programs. The actual description of the XM66D does not match up with the T95 turret. The tank in Armada was built from the beginning on the M48 chassis, according to the original work order for it I found in the archives. The T95 and M60 hulls with T95S turrets were separate individuals entirely, since three T95S turrets were built, according to Hunnicut.
Back to top
View user's profile
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2023 4:08 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Harold and welcome.

The tank in Armada Michigan has the old Main Battle Tank - Medium Range (MBT-MR) turret installed. That’s why it has the driver in the turret position. This was the progenitor to the MBT70/XM803 program and envisioned as early as 1958. It was used as an ersatz "D" model turret demonstrator for what was to become the M60A2. The "D" model turret proposed in 1961 was supposed to be a basic M60A1 turret modified to accept the 152mm gun/launcher and associated equipment. None were produced. Instead, they realized a modified MBT-MR three-man turret without the driver could be made just as fast. At the same time, the Compact Turret designed by Clifford Bradley originally envisioned for the MBT-MR was considered for the M60/Shillelagh system. This unique type of turret is what the M60A2 eventually used, and the “A” and “B” models were alternate versions. The picture posted by Don "Dontos" Moriarty (RIP) is of M60 hull RN 9B4470 and has the “A” model Clifford Bradley designed turret, aka "Compact Turret". They eventually ended up on the T95 hulls that were used to test systems being developed for the MBT70/XM803. The T95 hulls being relegated to this duty when its program was cancelled in 1959. The three T95S turrets requested for the Shillelagh program were the T95/96 Turrets already produced for the T95 program and originally designed to have a fixed mount, no recoil, hypervelocity gun. They were modified to accept the M81 152mm Gun/Launcher and were installed on M48A1 gasser hulls to conduct test firing at White Sands Missile range by Aeronutronic Philco-Ford. Below are pictures of one conducting live fire tests. Once the M551 pilots were made these rigs were no longer needed.





About that M48 hull at Armada. I wrote a post years ago and ID'd it as having the "D" turret erroneously. The hull is one of the 6 M48A1’s converted to AVDS-1790 diesel and eventually became one of the two pilot M48A3’s. Here is a link to it: Pilot M48A3. The plaque installed in front of her is wrong. The only XM66 connection was the turret being used as a demonstrator for the D model turret. Here is a picture of 9B4470 with it:


_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 7:57 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Joe! Thanks for checking in. With regard to the test rig shown in Don's old post...do you know if MICOM was using that or a similar rig? Was any firing done at Redstone or if part of a MICOM operation, perfomed exclusively at White Sands? I've been trying to establish what platform was being used in the tests that were referred to by MICOM reps at a 1969 meeting at Ft. Knox. They assiduously avoided any use of or comment on Shillelagh launches involving an actual Sheridan. There are two tests in particular I'm interested in: First was a "shoot-off" between Shillelagh and M60A1. Second was a series of Missile Readiness firings they cited to anybody who would listen....503 missiles, 91% successful hit rate. It was a lie and 162 of those missiles were not even fired.
I'd love to know if this was the rig likely in use?
Best regards,
D.

- Joe_D
Hi Harold and welcome.

The tank in Armada Michigan has the old Main Battle Tank - Medium Range (MBT-MR) turret installed. That’s why it has the driver in the turret position. This was the progenitor to the MBT70/XM803 program and envisioned as early as 1958. It was used as an ersatz "D" model turret demonstrator for what was to become the M60A2. The "D" model turret proposed in 1961 was supposed to be a basic M60A1 turret modified to accept the 152mm gun/launcher and associated equipment. None were produced. Instead, they realized a modified MBT-MR three-man turret without the driver could be made just as fast. At the same time, the Compact Turret designed by Clifford Bradley originally envisioned for the MBT-MR was considered for the M60/Shillelagh system. This unique type of turret is what the M60A2 eventually used, and the “A” and “B” models were alternate versions. The picture posted by Don "Dontos" Moriarty (RIP) is of M60 hull RN 9B4470 and has the “A” model Clifford Bradley designed turret, aka "Compact Turret". They eventually ended up on the T95 hulls that were used to test systems being developed for the MBT70/XM803. The T95 hulls being relegated to this duty when its program was cancelled in 1959. The three T95S turrets requested for the Shillelagh program were the T95/96 Turrets already produced for the T95 program and originally designed to have a fixed mount, no recoil, hypervelocity gun. They were modified to accept the M81 152mm Gun/Launcher and were installed on M48A1 gasser hulls to conduct test firing at White Sands Missile range by Aeronutronic Philco-Ford. Below are pictures of one conducting live fire tests. Once the M551 pilots were made these rigs were no longer needed.





About that M48 hull at Armada. I wrote a post years ago and ID'd it as having the "D" turret erroneously. The hull is one of the 6 M48A1’s converted to AVDS-1790 diesel and eventually became one of the two pilot M48A3’s. Here is a link to it: Pilot M48A3. The plaque installed in front of her is wrong. The only XM66 connection was the turret being used as a demonstrator for the D model turret. Here is a picture of 9B4470 with it:

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 5:01 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Doug,

I can say for certainty that the M48/T95 rig wasn't used for those tests. Anything else I'd have to unpack some boxes to find the info. Give me some time and eventually I'll be back on a normal routine. Right now I'm way to busy.

Nice to hear from you.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Sat Jul 01, 2023 10:34 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Doug,

Sorry for the long overdue reply. Checked my library and came up with this conclusion. In 1969 there were a very limited amount of M60A1E2's available. 300 were in storage until a satisfactory scavenge system was approved and implemented along with a plethora of other issues. The few available (approximately 14) were distributed between Knox, Aberdeen, Detroit, and Redstone, being used to develop/fix issues with the stabilization system, recoil mechanism, CBSS, FCS, and laser. The M551 was plentiful and capable of conducting these firings. It is highly unlikely they would have diverted any M60A1E2's for a test the M551 could just as satisfactorily conduct. If I find anything else to nail this down, I'll post it.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum