±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 413
Total: 413
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Photo Gallery
03: Home
04: Photo Gallery
05: Home
06: Home
07: Home
08: Photo Gallery
09: Home
10: Community Forums
11: Home
12: Home
13: Community Forums
14: Home
15: Home
16: Home
17: Home
18: Photo Gallery
19: Community Forums
20: Home
21: Home
22: Home
23: Community Forums
24: Photo Gallery
25: Home
26: Community Forums
27: Home
28: Home
29: Photo Gallery
30: Home
31: Community Forums
32: Photo Gallery
33: Home
34: Community Forums
35: Home
36: Home
37: Home
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Photo Gallery
41: Community Forums
42: Home
43: Home
44: Home
45: Home
46: Photo Gallery
47: Home
48: Community Forums
49: Home
50: Home
51: Home
52: Photo Gallery
53: Home
54: Home
55: Home
56: Photo Gallery
57: Community Forums
58: Photo Gallery
59: Home
60: Photo Gallery
61: Photo Gallery
62: Home
63: News
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Photo Gallery
67: Home
68: Home
69: Home
70: Photo Gallery
71: Home
72: Home
73: Home
74: Home
75: Community Forums
76: Photo Gallery
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: Home
80: Home
81: Photo Gallery
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Home
86: Home
87: Community Forums
88: Photo Gallery
89: Community Forums
90: Home
91: Home
92: Home
93: Photo Gallery
94: Home
95: Community Forums
96: Home
97: Community Forums
98: Home
99: Photo Gallery
100: Photo Gallery
101: Home
102: Home
103: Community Forums
104: Home
105: Downloads
106: Photo Gallery
107: Home
108: Community Forums
109: Home
110: Home
111: Home
112: Home
113: Home
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Home
117: Home
118: Home
119: Home
120: Home
121: Home
122: Community Forums
123: Home
124: Community Forums
125: Home
126: News Archive
127: Home
128: Community Forums
129: Home
130: Home
131: Home
132: Community Forums
133: Home
134: Photo Gallery
135: Community Forums
136: Home
137: Home
138: Community Forums
139: Home
140: Community Forums
141: Home
142: Photo Gallery
143: Community Forums
144: Home
145: Home
146: News Archive
147: Home
148: Community Forums
149: Downloads
150: Home
151: Home
152: Home
153: Home
154: Community Forums
155: News
156: Home
157: Home
158: Home
159: Downloads
160: Community Forums
161: Home
162: Community Forums
163: Home
164: Home
165: Home
166: Home
167: Home
168: Home
169: Home
170: Home
171: Home
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Home
175: Community Forums
176: Home
177: Community Forums
178: Home
179: Community Forums
180: Home
181: Home
182: Home
183: News
184: Home
185: Community Forums
186: Member Screenshots
187: News Archive
188: Home
189: Home
190: Home
191: Home
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Home
196: Community Forums
197: Home
198: Home
199: Home
200: Community Forums
201: Home
202: Community Forums
203: Home
204: Community Forums
205: Photo Gallery
206: Home
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Home
211: Photo Gallery
212: Community Forums
213: Home
214: Community Forums
215: Home
216: Downloads
217: Community Forums
218: Home
219: Community Forums
220: Downloads
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Community Forums
224: Home
225: Home
226: Home
227: Home
228: Photo Gallery
229: Community Forums
230: Home
231: Home
232: Photo Gallery
233: Home
234: Community Forums
235: Home
236: Home
237: Home
238: Home
239: Home
240: Photo Gallery
241: Home
242: Home
243: Home
244: Photo Gallery
245: Home
246: Home
247: Home
248: Home
249: Photo Gallery
250: Photo Gallery
251: Home
252: Downloads
253: Home
254: Photo Gallery
255: Community Forums
256: Home
257: Home
258: Community Forums
259: Photo Gallery
260: News Archive
261: Home
262: Community Forums
263: Home
264: Community Forums
265: Photo Gallery
266: Home
267: Home
268: Home
269: Community Forums
270: Home
271: Home
272: Community Forums
273: Home
274: Photo Gallery
275: Community Forums
276: Home
277: Home
278: Home
279: Home
280: Community Forums
281: Photo Gallery
282: Community Forums
283: Home
284: Community Forums
285: Home
286: Home
287: Home
288: Home
289: Community Forums
290: Downloads
291: Home
292: Home
293: Photo Gallery
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Home
297: Home
298: Home
299: Home
300: Community Forums
301: Home
302: Community Forums
303: Home
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Home
307: Downloads
308: Home
309: Community Forums
310: Home
311: Home
312: Community Forums
313: Home
314: Home
315: Community Forums
316: Home
317: Home
318: Home
319: Home
320: Home
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Home
324: Photo Gallery
325: Community Forums
326: Home
327: Home
328: Home
329: Home
330: Home
331: Community Forums
332: Community Forums
333: Community Forums
334: Home
335: Home
336: Community Forums
337: Home
338: Home
339: Community Forums
340: Home
341: Home
342: Home
343: Home
344: Community Forums
345: Home
346: Community Forums
347: Home
348: Home
349: Home
350: Home
351: Home
352: Downloads
353: Community Forums
354: Home
355: Community Forums
356: Home
357: Photo Gallery
358: Home
359: Community Forums
360: Home
361: Home
362: Downloads
363: Community Forums
364: Home
365: Community Forums
366: Home
367: Home
368: Community Forums
369: Home
370: Community Forums
371: Home
372: Community Forums
373: News Archive
374: Home
375: Home
376: Home
377: Home
378: Home
379: Home
380: Home
381: Home
382: Home
383: Home
384: Home
385: Home
386: Member Screenshots
387: Community Forums
388: Home
389: Home
390: Home
391: Home
392: Photo Gallery
393: Home
394: Home
395: Home
396: Community Forums
397: Home
398: Home
399: Photo Gallery
400: Community Forums
401: Home
402: Home
403: News Archive
404: Home
405: Home
406: Community Forums
407: Home
408: Home
409: Home
410: Community Forums
411: Home
412: Community Forums
413: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
XM 66 Tank Proposal
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:51 pm
Post subject: XM 66 Tank Proposal

This is a 'spin-off' Vehicle from the T95 Program.



Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:11 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Interesting - You say it was a spinoff of teh T95 program. Where does this fit in the M60A2 genisis? The picture looks like an M6A1E1 or M60A2. Could it be that the Army decided that it would be easier to get the program survive by either giving it a new designator (XM66) or developing it as a member of the M60 family

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
tanker2010
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: 264
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:30 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

It does have a strange hull. While it has the shape and fenders of a M60, it has 5 return rollers.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:37 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

The turret is similiar to the T95 test bed at the LST buiding.
(NOTE: The 20mm gun is removed, but mount location is obvious)





This is around the time of the M60A2 development.

Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:12 am
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

XM66 is the now known as M60A2 program.

That's a poor picture of M60 hull 9B4470 with the proposed "A" model turret. I think I posted a copy of it a while back.

In it's early stages the adaptation of the 152mm gun/launcher to the M60 was called the XM66. They reviewed 4 turret types, A, B, C, and D. "A" and "B" were similar compact types, with the "B" model being taller. The "C" model was very similar in appearance to an over grown M551 turret, and the "D" was a modified M60A1 turret with shorter rear. In early 1965 they changed the program name to M60A1E1. The "B" model ended up being selected and eventually became the M60A2.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Andrei
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Posts: 81

PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 3:19 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Interesting if any alternative armament options were considered for XM 66 or M60A2 at the initial development (60s), later they considered 120 mm US and British guns, as well as M68.
Back to top
View user's profile
Harold_Biondo
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2021
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2022 6:17 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

- Joe_D
XM66 is the now known as M60A2 program.

That's a poor picture of M60 hull 9B4470 with the proposed "A" model turret. I think I posted a copy of it a while back.

In it's early stages the adaptation of the 152mm gun/launcher to the M60 was called the XM66. They reviewed 4 turret types, A, B, C, and D. "A" and "B" were similar compact types, with the "B" model being taller. The "C" model was very similar in appearance to an over grown M551 turret, and the "D" was a modified M60A1 turret with shorter rear. In early 1965 they changed the program name to M60A1E1. The "B" model ended up being selected and eventually became the M60A2.


If this was referring to the tank that is in Armada Michigan, that is not in fact the XM66D (or A, in this case) turret, it is the T95S turret. S standing for Shillelagh. There was some cross-pollination going on between the M60A2 and T95 programs. The actual description of the XM66D does not match up with the T95 turret. The tank in Armada was built from the beginning on the M48 chassis, according to the original work order for it I found in the archives. The T95 and M60 hulls with T95S turrets were separate individuals entirely, since three T95S turrets were built, according to Hunnicut.
Back to top
View user's profile
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2023 4:08 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Harold and welcome.

The tank in Armada Michigan has the old Main Battle Tank - Medium Range (MBT-MR) turret installed. That’s why it has the driver in the turret position. This was the progenitor to the MBT70/XM803 program and envisioned as early as 1958. It was used as an ersatz "D" model turret demonstrator for what was to become the M60A2. The "D" model turret proposed in 1961 was supposed to be a basic M60A1 turret modified to accept the 152mm gun/launcher and associated equipment. None were produced. Instead, they realized a modified MBT-MR three-man turret without the driver could be made just as fast. At the same time, the Compact Turret designed by Clifford Bradley originally envisioned for the MBT-MR was considered for the M60/Shillelagh system. This unique type of turret is what the M60A2 eventually used, and the “A” and “B” models were alternate versions. The picture posted by Don "Dontos" Moriarty (RIP) is of M60 hull RN 9B4470 and has the “A” model Clifford Bradley designed turret, aka "Compact Turret". They eventually ended up on the T95 hulls that were used to test systems being developed for the MBT70/XM803. The T95 hulls being relegated to this duty when its program was cancelled in 1959. The three T95S turrets requested for the Shillelagh program were the T95/96 Turrets already produced for the T95 program and originally designed to have a fixed mount, no recoil, hypervelocity gun. They were modified to accept the M81 152mm Gun/Launcher and were installed on M48A1 gasser hulls to conduct test firing at White Sands Missile range by Aeronutronic Philco-Ford. Below are pictures of one conducting live fire tests. Once the M551 pilots were made these rigs were no longer needed.





About that M48 hull at Armada. I wrote a post years ago and ID'd it as having the "D" turret erroneously. The hull is one of the 6 M48A1’s converted to AVDS-1790 diesel and eventually became one of the two pilot M48A3’s. Here is a link to it: Pilot M48A3. The plaque installed in front of her is wrong. The only XM66 connection was the turret being used as a demonstrator for the D model turret. Here is a picture of 9B4470 with it:


_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 7:57 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Joe! Thanks for checking in. With regard to the test rig shown in Don's old post...do you know if MICOM was using that or a similar rig? Was any firing done at Redstone or if part of a MICOM operation, perfomed exclusively at White Sands? I've been trying to establish what platform was being used in the tests that were referred to by MICOM reps at a 1969 meeting at Ft. Knox. They assiduously avoided any use of or comment on Shillelagh launches involving an actual Sheridan. There are two tests in particular I'm interested in: First was a "shoot-off" between Shillelagh and M60A1. Second was a series of Missile Readiness firings they cited to anybody who would listen....503 missiles, 91% successful hit rate. It was a lie and 162 of those missiles were not even fired.
I'd love to know if this was the rig likely in use?
Best regards,
D.

- Joe_D
Hi Harold and welcome.

The tank in Armada Michigan has the old Main Battle Tank - Medium Range (MBT-MR) turret installed. That’s why it has the driver in the turret position. This was the progenitor to the MBT70/XM803 program and envisioned as early as 1958. It was used as an ersatz "D" model turret demonstrator for what was to become the M60A2. The "D" model turret proposed in 1961 was supposed to be a basic M60A1 turret modified to accept the 152mm gun/launcher and associated equipment. None were produced. Instead, they realized a modified MBT-MR three-man turret without the driver could be made just as fast. At the same time, the Compact Turret designed by Clifford Bradley originally envisioned for the MBT-MR was considered for the M60/Shillelagh system. This unique type of turret is what the M60A2 eventually used, and the “A” and “B” models were alternate versions. The picture posted by Don "Dontos" Moriarty (RIP) is of M60 hull RN 9B4470 and has the “A” model Clifford Bradley designed turret, aka "Compact Turret". They eventually ended up on the T95 hulls that were used to test systems being developed for the MBT70/XM803. The T95 hulls being relegated to this duty when its program was cancelled in 1959. The three T95S turrets requested for the Shillelagh program were the T95/96 Turrets already produced for the T95 program and originally designed to have a fixed mount, no recoil, hypervelocity gun. They were modified to accept the M81 152mm Gun/Launcher and were installed on M48A1 gasser hulls to conduct test firing at White Sands Missile range by Aeronutronic Philco-Ford. Below are pictures of one conducting live fire tests. Once the M551 pilots were made these rigs were no longer needed.





About that M48 hull at Armada. I wrote a post years ago and ID'd it as having the "D" turret erroneously. The hull is one of the 6 M48A1’s converted to AVDS-1790 diesel and eventually became one of the two pilot M48A3’s. Here is a link to it: Pilot M48A3. The plaque installed in front of her is wrong. The only XM66 connection was the turret being used as a demonstrator for the D model turret. Here is a picture of 9B4470 with it:

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 5:01 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Doug,

I can say for certainty that the M48/T95 rig wasn't used for those tests. Anything else I'd have to unpack some boxes to find the info. Give me some time and eventually I'll be back on a normal routine. Right now I'm way to busy.

Nice to hear from you.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Sat Jul 01, 2023 10:34 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Doug,

Sorry for the long overdue reply. Checked my library and came up with this conclusion. In 1969 there were a very limited amount of M60A1E2's available. 300 were in storage until a satisfactory scavenge system was approved and implemented along with a plethora of other issues. The few available (approximately 14) were distributed between Knox, Aberdeen, Detroit, and Redstone, being used to develop/fix issues with the stabilization system, recoil mechanism, CBSS, FCS, and laser. The M551 was plentiful and capable of conducting these firings. It is highly unlikely they would have diverted any M60A1E2's for a test the M551 could just as satisfactorily conduct. If I find anything else to nail this down, I'll post it.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum