±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 539
Total: 539
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Home
03: Community Forums
04: Member Screenshots
05: Home
06: Community Forums
07: Home
08: Home
09: Community Forums
10: Home
11: Community Forums
12: Member Screenshots
13: Home
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Member Screenshots
17: Photo Gallery
18: Downloads
19: Community Forums
20: Home
21: News
22: Community Forums
23: Home
24: Home
25: Home
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: News Archive
32: Member Screenshots
33: Home
34: Contact
35: Member Screenshots
36: Member Screenshots
37: Community Forums
38: Home
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Downloads
43: Home
44: Home
45: Member Screenshots
46: Community Forums
47: Home
48: Your Account
49: Home
50: Downloads
51: Home
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Photo Gallery
55: Home
56: News Archive
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Home
60: Downloads
61: Photo Gallery
62: Downloads
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Community Forums
67: Search
68: Home
69: Member Screenshots
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Home
73: Member Screenshots
74: Downloads
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Home
78: Community Forums
79: Home
80: Member Screenshots
81: Community Forums
82: Home
83: Community Forums
84: Downloads
85: Community Forums
86: Your Account
87: Downloads
88: Community Forums
89: Home
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Home
93: Community Forums
94: Home
95: Member Screenshots
96: Community Forums
97: Downloads
98: News Archive
99: Your Account
100: Community Forums
101: Home
102: Downloads
103: Home
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Home
107: Community Forums
108: Home
109: Community Forums
110: Home
111: Home
112: News Archive
113: Member Screenshots
114: Home
115: Home
116: Photo Gallery
117: Home
118: Home
119: Home
120: Photo Gallery
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Home
124: Home
125: Home
126: Downloads
127: Home
128: News Archive
129: Home
130: Community Forums
131: Photo Gallery
132: Photo Gallery
133: Home
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Photo Gallery
138: Community Forums
139: Home
140: Community Forums
141: Home
142: Home
143: Home
144: Home
145: Your Account
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Home
151: Search
152: Community Forums
153: Downloads
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Home
157: Community Forums
158: Home
159: News Archive
160: Member Screenshots
161: Home
162: Community Forums
163: Home
164: Downloads
165: Community Forums
166: Downloads
167: News Archive
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Downloads
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Home
175: LinkToUs
176: Home
177: Home
178: Home
179: Home
180: Home
181: Community Forums
182: Home
183: Community Forums
184: Downloads
185: Home
186: Home
187: Home
188: Home
189: Community Forums
190: Community Forums
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Home
195: Community Forums
196: Home
197: Community Forums
198: Home
199: Community Forums
200: Home
201: Community Forums
202: Member Screenshots
203: Photo Gallery
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Home
208: Member Screenshots
209: Home
210: Community Forums
211: Home
212: Home
213: Community Forums
214: Home
215: Community Forums
216: Your Account
217: Community Forums
218: News Archive
219: Home
220: Home
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Home
224: Home
225: Community Forums
226: Downloads
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Home
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Home
236: Home
237: Home
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Photo Gallery
242: Community Forums
243: Home
244: Community Forums
245: News
246: Member Screenshots
247: Community Forums
248: Home
249: Downloads
250: Home
251: Photo Gallery
252: Home
253: Home
254: Home
255: Community Forums
256: Community Forums
257: Home
258: Downloads
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Home
262: Community Forums
263: Statistics
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: News
267: News Archive
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Photo Gallery
271: Home
272: Community Forums
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: Community Forums
279: Community Forums
280: News Archive
281: Community Forums
282: Community Forums
283: Home
284: Supporters
285: Community Forums
286: Community Forums
287: Home
288: Community Forums
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Home
293: Community Forums
294: Home
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Home
300: Community Forums
301: Home
302: Home
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Community Forums
307: Community Forums
308: Home
309: Community Forums
310: Downloads
311: Member Screenshots
312: Member Screenshots
313: Community Forums
314: Home
315: Community Forums
316: Home
317: Community Forums
318: Home
319: Community Forums
320: Contact
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Home
324: Home
325: Home
326: Home
327: Home
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: Community Forums
333: Home
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: Home
337: Member Screenshots
338: Community Forums
339: Member Screenshots
340: Home
341: Community Forums
342: Community Forums
343: Photo Gallery
344: Home
345: Home
346: Photo Gallery
347: Home
348: Community Forums
349: Community Forums
350: Community Forums
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Photo Gallery
354: Home
355: Community Forums
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Home
359: Member Screenshots
360: Community Forums
361: Community Forums
362: Home
363: Community Forums
364: Community Forums
365: Home
366: Community Forums
367: News Archive
368: Community Forums
369: Community Forums
370: Member Screenshots
371: Home
372: Home
373: Community Forums
374: Home
375: Home
376: Home
377: Downloads
378: Home
379: Supporters
380: Community Forums
381: Photo Gallery
382: Community Forums
383: Photo Gallery
384: Home
385: Community Forums
386: Home
387: Home
388: Community Forums
389: Downloads
390: News Archive
391: Community Forums
392: Member Screenshots
393: Home
394: Community Forums
395: Member Screenshots
396: Home
397: Community Forums
398: Community Forums
399: Community Forums
400: Home
401: Community Forums
402: Community Forums
403: Community Forums
404: Downloads
405: Home
406: Your Account
407: Community Forums
408: Home
409: Home
410: Photo Gallery
411: Home
412: Home
413: Home
414: Home
415: Home
416: Community Forums
417: Community Forums
418: Community Forums
419: Community Forums
420: Community Forums
421: Home
422: News Archive
423: Home
424: Community Forums
425: Downloads
426: Home
427: Member Screenshots
428: Photo Gallery
429: Community Forums
430: Photo Gallery
431: Community Forums
432: Home
433: Community Forums
434: Community Forums
435: Your Account
436: Community Forums
437: Photo Gallery
438: Community Forums
439: Home
440: Community Forums
441: Community Forums
442: Downloads
443: Home
444: Community Forums
445: Home
446: Community Forums
447: Home
448: Community Forums
449: Community Forums
450: Home
451: Community Forums
452: Community Forums
453: Community Forums
454: Community Forums
455: Home
456: Community Forums
457: Community Forums
458: Home
459: Member Screenshots
460: Community Forums
461: Home
462: Community Forums
463: Community Forums
464: Community Forums
465: Community Forums
466: Community Forums
467: Home
468: Home
469: Community Forums
470: Member Screenshots
471: Community Forums
472: Home
473: Downloads
474: Home
475: Community Forums
476: News Archive
477: Home
478: Community Forums
479: LinkToUs
480: Home
481: Community Forums
482: Community Forums
483: Community Forums
484: Member Screenshots
485: Community Forums
486: Home
487: Photo Gallery
488: Community Forums
489: Home
490: Home
491: Community Forums
492: Home
493: Community Forums
494: Home
495: Community Forums
496: Community Forums
497: News Archive
498: Community Forums
499: Community Forums
500: Home
501: News Archive
502: Community Forums
503: Community Forums
504: Community Forums
505: Community Forums
506: Home
507: Community Forums
508: Community Forums
509: Home
510: Home
511: Community Forums
512: Home
513: Member Screenshots
514: Community Forums
515: Photo Gallery
516: Community Forums
517: Community Forums
518: Home
519: Member Screenshots
520: Home
521: Community Forums
522: Community Forums
523: Home
524: Community Forums
525: Community Forums
526: Home
527: Home
528: Downloads
529: Home
530: Community Forums
531: Community Forums
532: Home
533: Photo Gallery
534: Member Screenshots
535: Your Account
536: Home
537: Home
538: Home
539: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Pros and Cons of Windows Vista :: Archived
This is a forum for Software related items such as OS', Virus notices, cool or free programs, etc. Gaming software should go in the gaming folder pertaining to the current info.
Post new topic    Revive this topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  Software

Topic Archived View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Shadow_Bshwackr
Janitor

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Posts: 7019
Location: Central Illinois, USA
PostPosted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 2:36 pm
Post subject: Pros and Cons of Windows Vista

Here's some interesting points about the upcoming release of Windows Vista and some comments from Beta testers. I'll let you make up your own mind, but both articles are worth reading IMO... Wink

First, the Pros...

Why Windows Vista Won't Suck

Major Kernel Overhaul

Many users view Windows XP (and Windows 2000, and previous Windows versions) as unsafe. No matter how many patches and updates Microsoft releases, the foundation of the OS itself�the kernel�is designed and built in a way that prevents it from being truly secure. The only solution, it is argued, is to redesign and rebuild the kernel with a focus on security and stability.

Well, that's sort of what Microsoft is doing with Vista. Rewriting the kernel completely would break too many applications, so that's not really an option. While the kernel in Vista is still primarily the same one as in Windows 2000 and XP, there have been some significant changes to tighten up security. Fewer parts of the OS as a whole run in Kernel mode - most drivers run in User mode, for instance. Things that run in Kernel mode are prevented from installing without verified security certificates, and even then they require administrator-level user permission. In Vista, it should be much more difficult for unauthorized programs (like Viruses and Trojans) to affect the core of the OS and secretly harm your system. In theory, you practically have to invite one in. Of course, the security of the kernel is unproven and will remain so until the OS ships and is out "in the wild," but it's encouraging that Microsoft has done everything they can to enhance stability and security while maintaining backward compatibility, which is no easy task.

That's not all, of course. Microsoft has made it their aim to make life easier on developers by improving and simplifying the way software interfaces with the system and the underlying hardware. Naturally, performance has been a major concern, too.

Take, for example, heaps. Most Windows XP users don't know what a "heap" is (it deals with how developers allocate memory and make memory requests), but there are problems in Windows XP when developers deal with large heaps, heap fragmentation, etc. In the Vista kernel, they have cleaned that up, helping to prevent heap fragmentation and gracefully deal with large heap requests. If that sounds like a bunch of technobabble nonsense, don't worry. You don't have to know what it means, you just have to know that it makes life easier on developers and improves performance. And it doesn't stop with heaps. Lots of relatively little, commonly-used functions have been improved, like procedure calls.

Then there's power management. System power management queries between system drivers and the OS have gotten a major overhaul, so it should be easier for hardware vendors to make their devices work in low-power environments and seamlessly work with power-saving features like Hibernation and Sleep Mode. "What is Sleep Mode?" you ask? On desktop systems, turning off the power will, by default, put your computer in Sleep Mode, where all the data currently in use is saved to both RAM and the hard drive, and then turns everything off except for a few key components (CPU, RAM, a few chipset features).

Move the mouse or press a key and the computer "boots" in a few seconds. In reality, your computer never turned off, it just went into a super-low-power mode. On laptops, Sleep Mode works much the same way when you hit the power button or close the lid, except it doesn't take the time to double-save everything to a hard disk. Instead, it monitors battery life in the ultra-low-power Sleep Mode and, when the battery gets low, transfers the RAM contents to the hard disk. It's like Hibernate mode, only faster.

A key improvement to the root file system and memory management of Vista is a technology called SuperFetch. SuperFetch learns which applications and bits and pieces of the OS you use most and preloads them into memory, so you don't have to wait for a bunch of hard drive paging before your apps or documents load. Microsoft has developed a pretty sophisticated prioritization scheme that can even differentiate which applications you are most likely to use at different times (on the weekend vs. during the week, or late at night vs. in the middle of the afternoon).

The scheme is also smart enough to make sure background tasks like virus scanners don't get priority over the foreground tasks you're working on. In fact, the whole I/O system now has a priority structure not that different from services, so your computer shouldn't bog down when some peer-to-peer file trading program has to do a hash check on a big file or something. SuperFetch also takes advantage of external memory devices�plug in that spare 256MB USB key (any size will work, really) and Windows can cache a lot of the working set to it. It's not as fast as your system RAM, but it's much faster than randomly grabbing small bits of data from all over your hard drive.

The driver model of Vista has been totally changed. Many of the drivers that used to sit at the system (kernel) level are now at the user level, which means that when drivers fail, your whole system shouldn't crash. You should also be able to update most drivers without rebooting your system.

Oh, and this time, we should have good 64-bit support. The 64-bit version of Vista ships at the same time as the 32-bit version and has all the same features�it may even be on the same disc. Everyone making Vista drivers who we know of are making functionally identical 32- and 64-bit drivers. With Vista, 64-bit computing might finally meet critical mass.

Why should you care?
The kernel may not be "sexy," but it's critical. It's one of those things where, if it's done right, you just take it for granted. Well the kernel and related operations (like I/O) in Vista should be far more secure by design, so hopefully we'll see almost no viruses or Trojans, or at least not any that affect a large number of users. SuperFetch shows a lot of promise, since it can hide the slow performance with data loading and make your computer feel a lot more "snappy." The new driver model is definitely a great thing�fewer critical system failures from bad drivers and less rebooting when drivers get updated.


To continue reading the whole article... Click HERE!

To continue to the Cons...

y Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Oh! My aching head.

When I first saw ExtremeTech's Why Windows Vista Won't Suck, I thought: "Aha, sarcasm."

Nope. I was wrong.

They really were saying that Vista is pretty good.

Oh please.

First, let me say, I've been running Vista myself for quite some time. Next to me at this very moment is a Gateway 835GM. Under the hood, it has an Intel Pentium D 2.8GHz dual-core processor, an Intel 945G chipset, 1GB DDR2 (double data rate) DRAM, a 250GB SATA hard drive, and built-in Intel GMA (graphics media accelerator) 950 graphics. That's a fairly powerful machine. Which is a good thing, because it's the only PC in my office of 20 PCs that's got enough oomph to run the Windows Vista February CTP (Community Technology Preview) build 5308 without driving me into fits of rage.

Mind you, it's not enough machine for Vista. I could run any Linux with all the bells and whistles on it without a problem. But, even though this system meets Intel's recommendations for a Vista-capable Intel Professional Business Platform, it still doesn't have the graphics horsepower needed to carry off Vista's much ballyhooed three-dimensional Aero Glass interface.

My point is, though, that while I write a lot about Linux, and I prefer it, my real specialty is that I know operating systems of all types and sorts, including Vista.

So when I say Vista sucks, well, I know what I'm talking about.

"Suck" is a relative term, though. Vista will be better than XP, which has easily been Microsoft's best desktop operating system to date.

However, Vista also requires far more hardware oomph than previous Windows systems. I'd say Intel's recommendations are pretty much a minimum for Vista. I would only add that if you expect to see the fancy desktop, you need to invest in, say, an ATI Radeon XPress 200, an Nvidia nForce4, or a high-end graphics card.

The truth is that very, very few people are going to be upgrading their existing systems to Vista. To make it work well, you're really going to need a new computer. If you didn't buy your PC in 2006, I wouldn't even try to run Vista on it.

OK, so the first reason that Vista sucks is that, no matter what version you get, it's likely to be expensive. No matter what Microsoft ends up charging for it, the only way most people are likely to be running it is when they get a new PC.

Now, let's see what my colleagues at ExtremeTech have to say in Vista's defense ...

Vista is much safer and more secure. "The whole kernel has been reorganized and rewritten to help prevent software from affecting the system in unsavory ways."

Well, yes, this is certainly what Microsoft would have to do to make it truly secure. I've say that myself. Unfortunately, while Microsoft has worked hard on improving Vista's security, it's still pretty much the same old rickety kernel underneath it.

Need proof? In January, Microsoft shipped the first security patch for Vista. It was for the WMF (Windows Metafile) hole. You know, the one, that my security guru friend Larry Seltzer called, "one of those careless things Microsoft did years ago with little or no consideration for the security consequences."

Good job of cleaning up the core operating system, Microsoft!

Of course, Linux never had this kind of garbage to clean up in the first place.

The ExtremeTech guys also say that Microsoft has done a good job of cleaning up Windows' use of memory management and heaps. They're right about that.

What they don't mention is that Linux and Mac OS X have both done that kind of thing well for years. They also don't mention that for an application to actually get the most from these improvements, it will need to be rewritten. So, if you want to get the most from Vista, be sure to set some money aside for new applications as well as a new PC. You'll need it.

They also praise SuperFetch, Microsoft's new combination application pre-fetching technique and hyper-active virtual memory manager. Intelligent pre-fetching is a fine idea for boosting performance. You've been able to use it in any application written with the open-source GCC for years. Microsoft's execution of it, however, has one of the biggest "What were they thinking of?" mistakes I've seen in a long time.

You see, with SuperFetch you can a USB 2.0-based flash drive as a fetch buffer between your RAM and your hard disk. Let me spell that out for you. Vista will put part of your running application on a device that can be kicked off, knocked out, or that your dog can carry away as a chew toy. Do you see the problem here? Me too!

I also understand that Vista will have improved TCP/IP networking. It's nice to know that they've finally done something with that open-source BSD code that's the basis of their TCP/IP network protocol.

What ExtremeTech doesn't mention, though, is that Microsoft is also planning on making it so that you can use IPSec (IP security protocol) for internal network security. This is another of their "What were they thinking of?" moments.

IPSec works fine for VPNs (virtual private networks). But, as John Pescatore, an analyst at Gartner Inc., said about this scheme, "Once you try to encrypt internal communications, your network architecture breaks." He's got that right.

Next up, they say wonderful things about Home Premium Vista having Media Center capability being built into it. Maybe I'm just a little confused here, but after looking at the feature sets, the only thing I see that's changed here is that they'll be calling the next media-enabled Windows "Home Premium Vista" instead of "Media Center Vista."

They also praise this version for having CableCard support, with the result that you'll be able to record HD (high definition broadcasts) from cable instead of being stuck with OTA (over the air) HDTV, without turning your entertainment room into an electronics lab.

Excuse me, but that's not because Microsoft is being innovative. It's because they are still not shipping CableCard cards for PCs. Come the day they finally ship -- and I'm betting the ATI OCCUR makes it out first -- I suspect MythTV and the other open-source PVR (personal video recorder) projects will be right there.

The ExtremeTech crew also has nice things to say about Vista's audio support. Mea culpa, it is better than anything else out there. So, Linux desktop designers, it's time to get cracking on audio support. Vista's still won't be out, at the earliest, until the fourth quarter of this year, and that gives you plenty of time to play catch up.

DirectX10, which is mostly used for game graphics and in the aforementioned Aero, is also much improved. It's also, however, completely different from DirectX9. Current games, current graphic cards, won't be able to do anything with it, which is why Vista also supports DirectX 9.

Here again, I'll give the Microsoft guys come credit. DirecX10 is a big improvement for the gamers. It's still not going to make your PC the equal of a dedicated game console, however.

The folks from ExtremeTech also like the fact that Vista will have many more built-in applications. Isn't this why Microsoft got into trouble with the Department of Justice a while back? Isn't this the kind of thing that has both South Korea and the European Union raking them over the coals? Why, yes. Yes, it is.

Be that as it may, as I sit here looking at my SUSE 10 Linux desktop, I can't help but notice that I have, for free, every software application I could ever want. Advantage: Linux.

At the end of the story, the ExtremeTech crew 'fesses up that "We don't know that it's going to be great just yet." True. And, I don't know that it's going to suck yet, either.

Expensive? Yes. Awful? We'll see.

What I do know, is that I really don't see a thing, not one single thing, that will make the still undelivered Vista significantly better than the Linux or the Mac OS X desktops I have in front of me today.


-- Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols


To read this article with the links Enabled, Click HERE!

I for one am curious what MS plans on charging for the various versions of Vista...

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Kitform
Bar Maid

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 22, 2005
Posts: 2011
Location: Cleveland. UK.
PostPosted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 6:35 pm
Post subject: Re: Pros and Cons of Windows Vista

It's like when Windows 98 was released, the Windows 95 computer could hardly cope, an upgrade was required then.

Vista looks as though it needs a computer with a bit more 'poke' than we currently use for games just to run the OS. Shocked Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Uhu_Fledermaus
Aircraft Demolition Expert

Offline Offline
Joined: Nov 28, 2004
Posts: 4369
Location: Blaricum, The Netherlands ~GMT+1
PostPosted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 7:10 pm
Post subject: Re: Pros and Cons of Windows Vista

It's like when Windows 98 was released, the Windows 95 computer could hardly cope, an upgrade was required then.

Vista looks as though it needs a computer with a bit more 'poke' than we currently use for games just to run the OS. Shocked Shocked


your right Kit, have had alook at the "requirements" for fsX.

you'll need the most elaborate version of Vista to run it properly, the system to run that will set you back at nowaday prices something like 3,000 of your local currency.......................................not a pretty prospect to look forward to Sad

fled
Sad
Back to top
View user's profile ICQ Number MSN Messenger Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Revive this topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  Software
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours

Archive Revive
Username:
This is an archived topic - your reply will not be appended here.
Instead, a new topic will be generated in the active forum.
The new topic will provide a reference link to this archived topic.