±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 445
Total: 445
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: News Archive
02: Member Screenshots
03: Photo Gallery
04: Member Screenshots
05: Member Screenshots
06: Downloads
07: Home
08: Member Screenshots
09: Search
10: Community Forums
11: Photo Gallery
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: News
18: Photo Gallery
19: Your Account
20: Home
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Downloads
24: Community Forums
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Home
28: Community Forums
29: Home
30: Photo Gallery
31: Community Forums
32: Photo Gallery
33: Community Forums
34: Photo Gallery
35: Member Screenshots
36: Your Account
37: Member Screenshots
38: Statistics
39: News
40: Member Screenshots
41: Member Screenshots
42: Photo Gallery
43: Home
44: Statistics
45: Home
46: Member Screenshots
47: Photo Gallery
48: Home
49: Community Forums
50: Member Screenshots
51: News Archive
52: Home
53: News Archive
54: News
55: Photo Gallery
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Member Screenshots
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Your Account
62: Photo Gallery
63: Member Screenshots
64: Home
65: Home
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Home
69: Member Screenshots
70: Photo Gallery
71: Your Account
72: Community Forums
73: Home
74: News Archive
75: Home
76: Member Screenshots
77: Community Forums
78: Member Screenshots
79: Member Screenshots
80: Downloads
81: Home
82: Member Screenshots
83: Community Forums
84: Home
85: Community Forums
86: Home
87: Home
88: Home
89: Home
90: Home
91: Home
92: Home
93: Photo Gallery
94: Downloads
95: Community Forums
96: Member Screenshots
97: Contact
98: Photo Gallery
99: Member Screenshots
100: News Archive
101: Member Screenshots
102: Member Screenshots
103: Downloads
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Member Screenshots
107: Downloads
108: Home
109: Community Forums
110: Member Screenshots
111: Home
112: Home
113: Home
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Member Screenshots
117: Downloads
118: Member Screenshots
119: Downloads
120: Photo Gallery
121: Photo Gallery
122: Photo Gallery
123: Downloads
124: News Archive
125: Home
126: Member Screenshots
127: News Archive
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Home
131: Home
132: News Archive
133: Home
134: Home
135: Member Screenshots
136: Community Forums
137: Home
138: Home
139: Home
140: Home
141: News Archive
142: Member Screenshots
143: Home
144: Your Account
145: Home
146: Home
147: Downloads
148: Home
149: Home
150: Photo Gallery
151: Home
152: Community Forums
153: News Archive
154: Member Screenshots
155: Home
156: Home
157: Community Forums
158: Photo Gallery
159: Photo Gallery
160: Community Forums
161: Downloads
162: Home
163: Member Screenshots
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Photo Gallery
168: Community Forums
169: Photo Gallery
170: Home
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Community Forums
176: Photo Gallery
177: Member Screenshots
178: Photo Gallery
179: News Archive
180: Downloads
181: Member Screenshots
182: Photo Gallery
183: Downloads
184: Downloads
185: News Archive
186: Member Screenshots
187: Search
188: Downloads
189: Member Screenshots
190: Member Screenshots
191: Community Forums
192: News Archive
193: Member Screenshots
194: Photo Gallery
195: Photo Gallery
196: Member Screenshots
197: Community Forums
198: Member Screenshots
199: Community Forums
200: Home
201: Community Forums
202: Member Screenshots
203: Community Forums
204: Photo Gallery
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Member Screenshots
208: Home
209: Community Forums
210: Community Forums
211: Photo Gallery
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Home
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Home
218: Home
219: Community Forums
220: Photo Gallery
221: Downloads
222: Community Forums
223: Community Forums
224: News Archive
225: News
226: Home
227: Community Forums
228: News
229: Photo Gallery
230: Home
231: Photo Gallery
232: Member Screenshots
233: Home
234: Home
235: Member Screenshots
236: Home
237: Downloads
238: Home
239: Member Screenshots
240: Home
241: Home
242: Home
243: Home
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: Photo Gallery
247: Contact
248: News Archive
249: Home
250: News Archive
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Home
255: Community Forums
256: Member Screenshots
257: Member Screenshots
258: Member Screenshots
259: Your Account
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Member Screenshots
263: Photo Gallery
264: Home
265: Supporters
266: Downloads
267: Member Screenshots
268: Home
269: Your Account
270: Community Forums
271: Member Screenshots
272: News Archive
273: Member Screenshots
274: Home
275: Home
276: Home
277: Member Screenshots
278: Home
279: Home
280: Home
281: Community Forums
282: Home
283: Home
284: Community Forums
285: Home
286: Home
287: Home
288: Home
289: Home
290: News Archive
291: Member Screenshots
292: Community Forums
293: Home
294: Community Forums
295: Photo Gallery
296: Home
297: Home
298: Member Screenshots
299: Community Forums
300: Home
301: Community Forums
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Photo Gallery
305: Community Forums
306: Home
307: Home
308: Community Forums
309: News Archive
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Community Forums
313: Photo Gallery
314: Member Screenshots
315: Member Screenshots
316: News Archive
317: Treasury
318: Home
319: News Archive
320: Community Forums
321: News Archive
322: Community Forums
323: Member Screenshots
324: Home
325: Photo Gallery
326: Community Forums
327: Community Forums
328: Member Screenshots
329: Photo Gallery
330: Home
331: Community Forums
332: Home
333: Photo Gallery
334: Community Forums
335: Home
336: Community Forums
337: Home
338: Community Forums
339: Home
340: Community Forums
341: Community Forums
342: Community Forums
343: Home
344: Community Forums
345: Community Forums
346: Home
347: Community Forums
348: Home
349: Search
350: Photo Gallery
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Your Account
354: Community Forums
355: Community Forums
356: Community Forums
357: Downloads
358: Photo Gallery
359: Community Forums
360: Home
361: Community Forums
362: Home
363: News
364: Member Screenshots
365: Downloads
366: Search
367: Home
368: Your Account
369: Home
370: Home
371: Home
372: Community Forums
373: Community Forums
374: Member Screenshots
375: Community Forums
376: Home
377: Community Forums
378: Home
379: Home
380: Member Screenshots
381: Home
382: Community Forums
383: Community Forums
384: Home
385: News Archive
386: Community Forums
387: Member Screenshots
388: Home
389: Member Screenshots
390: Community Forums
391: Home
392: Home
393: Community Forums
394: Photo Gallery
395: Community Forums
396: Home
397: Community Forums
398: News Archive
399: Your Account
400: Member Screenshots
401: News Archive
402: News Archive
403: Community Forums
404: Home
405: Downloads
406: Member Screenshots
407: Home
408: Home
409: News Archive
410: Home
411: Home
412: Community Forums
413: Photo Gallery
414: Home
415: Community Forums
416: Community Forums
417: Home
418: Community Forums
419: Your Account
420: News Archive
421: Community Forums
422: Community Forums
423: Community Forums
424: Home
425: Community Forums
426: Photo Gallery
427: Community Forums
428: Community Forums
429: Community Forums
430: Photo Gallery
431: Community Forums
432: Community Forums
433: Photo Gallery
434: Community Forums
435: Photo Gallery
436: Community Forums
437: Community Forums
438: Your Account
439: Photo Gallery
440: Community Forums
441: Community Forums
442: Community Forums
443: Community Forums
444: Community Forums
445: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
XM 66 Tank Proposal
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:51 pm
Post subject: XM 66 Tank Proposal

This is a 'spin-off' Vehicle from the T95 Program.



Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:11 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Interesting - You say it was a spinoff of teh T95 program. Where does this fit in the M60A2 genisis? The picture looks like an M6A1E1 or M60A2. Could it be that the Army decided that it would be easier to get the program survive by either giving it a new designator (XM66) or developing it as a member of the M60 family

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
tanker2010
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: 264
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:30 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

It does have a strange hull. While it has the shape and fenders of a M60, it has 5 return rollers.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:37 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

The turret is similiar to the T95 test bed at the LST buiding.
(NOTE: The 20mm gun is removed, but mount location is obvious)





This is around the time of the M60A2 development.

Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:12 am
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

XM66 is the now known as M60A2 program.

That's a poor picture of M60 hull 9B4470 with the proposed "A" model turret. I think I posted a copy of it a while back.

In it's early stages the adaptation of the 152mm gun/launcher to the M60 was called the XM66. They reviewed 4 turret types, A, B, C, and D. "A" and "B" were similar compact types, with the "B" model being taller. The "C" model was very similar in appearance to an over grown M551 turret, and the "D" was a modified M60A1 turret with shorter rear. In early 1965 they changed the program name to M60A1E1. The "B" model ended up being selected and eventually became the M60A2.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Andrei
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Posts: 81

PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 3:19 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Interesting if any alternative armament options were considered for XM 66 or M60A2 at the initial development (60s), later they considered 120 mm US and British guns, as well as M68.
Back to top
View user's profile
Harold_Biondo
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2021
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2022 6:17 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

- Joe_D
XM66 is the now known as M60A2 program.

That's a poor picture of M60 hull 9B4470 with the proposed "A" model turret. I think I posted a copy of it a while back.

In it's early stages the adaptation of the 152mm gun/launcher to the M60 was called the XM66. They reviewed 4 turret types, A, B, C, and D. "A" and "B" were similar compact types, with the "B" model being taller. The "C" model was very similar in appearance to an over grown M551 turret, and the "D" was a modified M60A1 turret with shorter rear. In early 1965 they changed the program name to M60A1E1. The "B" model ended up being selected and eventually became the M60A2.


If this was referring to the tank that is in Armada Michigan, that is not in fact the XM66D (or A, in this case) turret, it is the T95S turret. S standing for Shillelagh. There was some cross-pollination going on between the M60A2 and T95 programs. The actual description of the XM66D does not match up with the T95 turret. The tank in Armada was built from the beginning on the M48 chassis, according to the original work order for it I found in the archives. The T95 and M60 hulls with T95S turrets were separate individuals entirely, since three T95S turrets were built, according to Hunnicut.
Back to top
View user's profile
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2023 4:08 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Harold and welcome.

The tank in Armada Michigan has the old Main Battle Tank - Medium Range (MBT-MR) turret installed. That’s why it has the driver in the turret position. This was the progenitor to the MBT70/XM803 program and envisioned as early as 1958. It was used as an ersatz "D" model turret demonstrator for what was to become the M60A2. The "D" model turret proposed in 1961 was supposed to be a basic M60A1 turret modified to accept the 152mm gun/launcher and associated equipment. None were produced. Instead, they realized a modified MBT-MR three-man turret without the driver could be made just as fast. At the same time, the Compact Turret designed by Clifford Bradley originally envisioned for the MBT-MR was considered for the M60/Shillelagh system. This unique type of turret is what the M60A2 eventually used, and the “A” and “B” models were alternate versions. The picture posted by Don "Dontos" Moriarty (RIP) is of M60 hull RN 9B4470 and has the “A” model Clifford Bradley designed turret, aka "Compact Turret". They eventually ended up on the T95 hulls that were used to test systems being developed for the MBT70/XM803. The T95 hulls being relegated to this duty when its program was cancelled in 1959. The three T95S turrets requested for the Shillelagh program were the T95/96 Turrets already produced for the T95 program and originally designed to have a fixed mount, no recoil, hypervelocity gun. They were modified to accept the M81 152mm Gun/Launcher and were installed on M48A1 gasser hulls to conduct test firing at White Sands Missile range by Aeronutronic Philco-Ford. Below are pictures of one conducting live fire tests. Once the M551 pilots were made these rigs were no longer needed.





About that M48 hull at Armada. I wrote a post years ago and ID'd it as having the "D" turret erroneously. The hull is one of the 6 M48A1’s converted to AVDS-1790 diesel and eventually became one of the two pilot M48A3’s. Here is a link to it: Pilot M48A3. The plaque installed in front of her is wrong. The only XM66 connection was the turret being used as a demonstrator for the D model turret. Here is a picture of 9B4470 with it:


_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 7:57 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Joe! Thanks for checking in. With regard to the test rig shown in Don's old post...do you know if MICOM was using that or a similar rig? Was any firing done at Redstone or if part of a MICOM operation, perfomed exclusively at White Sands? I've been trying to establish what platform was being used in the tests that were referred to by MICOM reps at a 1969 meeting at Ft. Knox. They assiduously avoided any use of or comment on Shillelagh launches involving an actual Sheridan. There are two tests in particular I'm interested in: First was a "shoot-off" between Shillelagh and M60A1. Second was a series of Missile Readiness firings they cited to anybody who would listen....503 missiles, 91% successful hit rate. It was a lie and 162 of those missiles were not even fired.
I'd love to know if this was the rig likely in use?
Best regards,
D.

- Joe_D
Hi Harold and welcome.

The tank in Armada Michigan has the old Main Battle Tank - Medium Range (MBT-MR) turret installed. That’s why it has the driver in the turret position. This was the progenitor to the MBT70/XM803 program and envisioned as early as 1958. It was used as an ersatz "D" model turret demonstrator for what was to become the M60A2. The "D" model turret proposed in 1961 was supposed to be a basic M60A1 turret modified to accept the 152mm gun/launcher and associated equipment. None were produced. Instead, they realized a modified MBT-MR three-man turret without the driver could be made just as fast. At the same time, the Compact Turret designed by Clifford Bradley originally envisioned for the MBT-MR was considered for the M60/Shillelagh system. This unique type of turret is what the M60A2 eventually used, and the “A” and “B” models were alternate versions. The picture posted by Don "Dontos" Moriarty (RIP) is of M60 hull RN 9B4470 and has the “A” model Clifford Bradley designed turret, aka "Compact Turret". They eventually ended up on the T95 hulls that were used to test systems being developed for the MBT70/XM803. The T95 hulls being relegated to this duty when its program was cancelled in 1959. The three T95S turrets requested for the Shillelagh program were the T95/96 Turrets already produced for the T95 program and originally designed to have a fixed mount, no recoil, hypervelocity gun. They were modified to accept the M81 152mm Gun/Launcher and were installed on M48A1 gasser hulls to conduct test firing at White Sands Missile range by Aeronutronic Philco-Ford. Below are pictures of one conducting live fire tests. Once the M551 pilots were made these rigs were no longer needed.





About that M48 hull at Armada. I wrote a post years ago and ID'd it as having the "D" turret erroneously. The hull is one of the 6 M48A1’s converted to AVDS-1790 diesel and eventually became one of the two pilot M48A3’s. Here is a link to it: Pilot M48A3. The plaque installed in front of her is wrong. The only XM66 connection was the turret being used as a demonstrator for the D model turret. Here is a picture of 9B4470 with it:

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 5:01 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Doug,

I can say for certainty that the M48/T95 rig wasn't used for those tests. Anything else I'd have to unpack some boxes to find the info. Give me some time and eventually I'll be back on a normal routine. Right now I'm way to busy.

Nice to hear from you.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Sat Jul 01, 2023 10:34 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Doug,

Sorry for the long overdue reply. Checked my library and came up with this conclusion. In 1969 there were a very limited amount of M60A1E2's available. 300 were in storage until a satisfactory scavenge system was approved and implemented along with a plethora of other issues. The few available (approximately 14) were distributed between Knox, Aberdeen, Detroit, and Redstone, being used to develop/fix issues with the stabilization system, recoil mechanism, CBSS, FCS, and laser. The M551 was plentiful and capable of conducting these firings. It is highly unlikely they would have diverted any M60A1E2's for a test the M551 could just as satisfactorily conduct. If I find anything else to nail this down, I'll post it.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum