±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 457
Total: 457
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Member Screenshots
02: Community Forums
03: Home
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: CPGlang
08: Community Forums
09: Home
10: Photo Gallery
11: Community Forums
12: Home
13: Downloads
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Downloads
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Home
24: Photo Gallery
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: CPGlang
28: Home
29: Home
30: Members List
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Home
37: Photo Gallery
38: Statistics
39: Home
40: Photo Gallery
41: CPGlang
42: CPGlang
43: Home
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Home
49: Home
50: Community Forums
51: Home
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Home
55: Community Forums
56: Photo Gallery
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Home
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Home
65: Community Forums
66: Community Forums
67: Photo Gallery
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: Home
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Community Forums
74: Home
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Home
79: Home
80: Community Forums
81: Downloads
82: Home
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Home
86: Home
87: Community Forums
88: Photo Gallery
89: Statistics
90: CPGlang
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Home
94: Home
95: Downloads
96: Community Forums
97: Home
98: Downloads
99: Community Forums
100: Photo Gallery
101: Photo Gallery
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Home
107: News
108: Photo Gallery
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Home
112: Photo Gallery
113: Community Forums
114: Statistics
115: Home
116: Home
117: Home
118: Home
119: Community Forums
120: Home
121: Downloads
122: Community Forums
123: Community Forums
124: Home
125: Community Forums
126: Photo Gallery
127: Home
128: Community Forums
129: Home
130: Community Forums
131: Home
132: Home
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Home
139: Community Forums
140: Home
141: Community Forums
142: Home
143: Community Forums
144: Photo Gallery
145: Home
146: Home
147: Home
148: Home
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Statistics
153: Photo Gallery
154: Photo Gallery
155: Community Forums
156: Photo Gallery
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: CPGlang
164: Photo Gallery
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Community Forums
168: News Archive
169: Home
170: Home
171: Community Forums
172: Home
173: Community Forums
174: Home
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Photo Gallery
179: Community Forums
180: Downloads
181: Home
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Photo Gallery
185: Community Forums
186: Home
187: Photo Gallery
188: Home
189: Home
190: Community Forums
191: Community Forums
192: Home
193: Photo Gallery
194: Your Account
195: Home
196: Community Forums
197: Photo Gallery
198: News
199: Community Forums
200: Home
201: Photo Gallery
202: Member Screenshots
203: Home
204: Treasury
205: Member Screenshots
206: Home
207: Community Forums
208: Downloads
209: Community Forums
210: Home
211: News Archive
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Member Screenshots
215: Photo Gallery
216: Home
217: Photo Gallery
218: Community Forums
219: CPGlang
220: Community Forums
221: Home
222: Community Forums
223: Photo Gallery
224: Home
225: Community Forums
226: News Archive
227: Home
228: Home
229: Photo Gallery
230: Home
231: CPGlang
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Member Screenshots
235: Member Screenshots
236: Community Forums
237: Photo Gallery
238: Home
239: Home
240: Home
241: Community Forums
242: News
243: Community Forums
244: CPGlang
245: Community Forums
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: Home
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Member Screenshots
254: Home
255: Home
256: Community Forums
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Your Account
260: Downloads
261: Community Forums
262: Downloads
263: Photo Gallery
264: Photo Gallery
265: Community Forums
266: Statistics
267: Community Forums
268: Home
269: Community Forums
270: Photo Gallery
271: Home
272: CPGlang
273: Community Forums
274: Photo Gallery
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Home
278: Community Forums
279: Member Screenshots
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: Home
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Community Forums
287: Home
288: Home
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Photo Gallery
293: Statistics
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Home
297: Community Forums
298: Home
299: Home
300: Community Forums
301: Home
302: Photo Gallery
303: Community Forums
304: Home
305: Search
306: Home
307: Home
308: Photo Gallery
309: Community Forums
310: Photo Gallery
311: Member Screenshots
312: Home
313: Community Forums
314: Community Forums
315: Community Forums
316: News
317: Photo Gallery
318: Home
319: Home
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Home
323: Community Forums
324: Community Forums
325: Home
326: Home
327: Home
328: Photo Gallery
329: Community Forums
330: Home
331: Community Forums
332: Community Forums
333: Downloads
334: Downloads
335: Community Forums
336: Community Forums
337: Community Forums
338: Home
339: Downloads
340: Community Forums
341: Home
342: Photo Gallery
343: Member Screenshots
344: News
345: Home
346: Community Forums
347: Home
348: Community Forums
349: Community Forums
350: Home
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Community Forums
354: Home
355: Community Forums
356: Community Forums
357: Home
358: Photo Gallery
359: Community Forums
360: Photo Gallery
361: Home
362: Community Forums
363: Photo Gallery
364: Community Forums
365: Community Forums
366: Home
367: Community Forums
368: Member Screenshots
369: Community Forums
370: Community Forums
371: Photo Gallery
372: Home
373: Home
374: Community Forums
375: Home
376: Community Forums
377: Community Forums
378: Home
379: Community Forums
380: CPGlang
381: Community Forums
382: Home
383: Community Forums
384: Community Forums
385: CPGlang
386: Community Forums
387: Home
388: Photo Gallery
389: Community Forums
390: Community Forums
391: Community Forums
392: Photo Gallery
393: Community Forums
394: Community Forums
395: Member Screenshots
396: Photo Gallery
397: News Archive
398: Community Forums
399: Home
400: Photo Gallery
401: Community Forums
402: Community Forums
403: Home
404: CPGlang
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Home
408: Community Forums
409: Community Forums
410: Home
411: Photo Gallery
412: Community Forums
413: Your Account
414: Home
415: Community Forums
416: Photo Gallery
417: Home
418: Photo Gallery
419: Community Forums
420: Home
421: Photo Gallery
422: Photo Gallery
423: Community Forums
424: Home
425: Photo Gallery
426: Downloads
427: Photo Gallery
428: Home
429: CPGlang
430: Community Forums
431: Home
432: Community Forums
433: Home
434: Home
435: Community Forums
436: Community Forums
437: Community Forums
438: Photo Gallery
439: Photo Gallery
440: Community Forums
441: Photo Gallery
442: Photo Gallery
443: Home
444: Community Forums
445: Home
446: Community Forums
447: Home
448: Photo Gallery
449: Home
450: Home
451: Photo Gallery
452: Home
453: Home
454: Community Forums
455: Photo Gallery
456: Community Forums
457: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
XM 66 Tank Proposal
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:51 pm
Post subject: XM 66 Tank Proposal

This is a 'spin-off' Vehicle from the T95 Program.



Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:11 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Interesting - You say it was a spinoff of teh T95 program. Where does this fit in the M60A2 genisis? The picture looks like an M6A1E1 or M60A2. Could it be that the Army decided that it would be easier to get the program survive by either giving it a new designator (XM66) or developing it as a member of the M60 family

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
tanker2010
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: 264
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:30 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

It does have a strange hull. While it has the shape and fenders of a M60, it has 5 return rollers.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:37 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

The turret is similiar to the T95 test bed at the LST buiding.
(NOTE: The 20mm gun is removed, but mount location is obvious)





This is around the time of the M60A2 development.

Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:12 am
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

XM66 is the now known as M60A2 program.

That's a poor picture of M60 hull 9B4470 with the proposed "A" model turret. I think I posted a copy of it a while back.

In it's early stages the adaptation of the 152mm gun/launcher to the M60 was called the XM66. They reviewed 4 turret types, A, B, C, and D. "A" and "B" were similar compact types, with the "B" model being taller. The "C" model was very similar in appearance to an over grown M551 turret, and the "D" was a modified M60A1 turret with shorter rear. In early 1965 they changed the program name to M60A1E1. The "B" model ended up being selected and eventually became the M60A2.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Andrei
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Posts: 81

PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 3:19 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Interesting if any alternative armament options were considered for XM 66 or M60A2 at the initial development (60s), later they considered 120 mm US and British guns, as well as M68.
Back to top
View user's profile
Harold_Biondo
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2021
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2022 6:17 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

- Joe_D
XM66 is the now known as M60A2 program.

That's a poor picture of M60 hull 9B4470 with the proposed "A" model turret. I think I posted a copy of it a while back.

In it's early stages the adaptation of the 152mm gun/launcher to the M60 was called the XM66. They reviewed 4 turret types, A, B, C, and D. "A" and "B" were similar compact types, with the "B" model being taller. The "C" model was very similar in appearance to an over grown M551 turret, and the "D" was a modified M60A1 turret with shorter rear. In early 1965 they changed the program name to M60A1E1. The "B" model ended up being selected and eventually became the M60A2.


If this was referring to the tank that is in Armada Michigan, that is not in fact the XM66D (or A, in this case) turret, it is the T95S turret. S standing for Shillelagh. There was some cross-pollination going on between the M60A2 and T95 programs. The actual description of the XM66D does not match up with the T95 turret. The tank in Armada was built from the beginning on the M48 chassis, according to the original work order for it I found in the archives. The T95 and M60 hulls with T95S turrets were separate individuals entirely, since three T95S turrets were built, according to Hunnicut.
Back to top
View user's profile
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2023 4:08 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Harold and welcome.

The tank in Armada Michigan has the old Main Battle Tank - Medium Range (MBT-MR) turret installed. That’s why it has the driver in the turret position. This was the progenitor to the MBT70/XM803 program and envisioned as early as 1958. It was used as an ersatz "D" model turret demonstrator for what was to become the M60A2. The "D" model turret proposed in 1961 was supposed to be a basic M60A1 turret modified to accept the 152mm gun/launcher and associated equipment. None were produced. Instead, they realized a modified MBT-MR three-man turret without the driver could be made just as fast. At the same time, the Compact Turret designed by Clifford Bradley originally envisioned for the MBT-MR was considered for the M60/Shillelagh system. This unique type of turret is what the M60A2 eventually used, and the “A” and “B” models were alternate versions. The picture posted by Don "Dontos" Moriarty (RIP) is of M60 hull RN 9B4470 and has the “A” model Clifford Bradley designed turret, aka "Compact Turret". They eventually ended up on the T95 hulls that were used to test systems being developed for the MBT70/XM803. The T95 hulls being relegated to this duty when its program was cancelled in 1959. The three T95S turrets requested for the Shillelagh program were the T95/96 Turrets already produced for the T95 program and originally designed to have a fixed mount, no recoil, hypervelocity gun. They were modified to accept the M81 152mm Gun/Launcher and were installed on M48A1 gasser hulls to conduct test firing at White Sands Missile range by Aeronutronic Philco-Ford. Below are pictures of one conducting live fire tests. Once the M551 pilots were made these rigs were no longer needed.





About that M48 hull at Armada. I wrote a post years ago and ID'd it as having the "D" turret erroneously. The hull is one of the 6 M48A1’s converted to AVDS-1790 diesel and eventually became one of the two pilot M48A3’s. Here is a link to it: Pilot M48A3. The plaque installed in front of her is wrong. The only XM66 connection was the turret being used as a demonstrator for the D model turret. Here is a picture of 9B4470 with it:


_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 7:57 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Joe! Thanks for checking in. With regard to the test rig shown in Don's old post...do you know if MICOM was using that or a similar rig? Was any firing done at Redstone or if part of a MICOM operation, perfomed exclusively at White Sands? I've been trying to establish what platform was being used in the tests that were referred to by MICOM reps at a 1969 meeting at Ft. Knox. They assiduously avoided any use of or comment on Shillelagh launches involving an actual Sheridan. There are two tests in particular I'm interested in: First was a "shoot-off" between Shillelagh and M60A1. Second was a series of Missile Readiness firings they cited to anybody who would listen....503 missiles, 91% successful hit rate. It was a lie and 162 of those missiles were not even fired.
I'd love to know if this was the rig likely in use?
Best regards,
D.

- Joe_D
Hi Harold and welcome.

The tank in Armada Michigan has the old Main Battle Tank - Medium Range (MBT-MR) turret installed. That’s why it has the driver in the turret position. This was the progenitor to the MBT70/XM803 program and envisioned as early as 1958. It was used as an ersatz "D" model turret demonstrator for what was to become the M60A2. The "D" model turret proposed in 1961 was supposed to be a basic M60A1 turret modified to accept the 152mm gun/launcher and associated equipment. None were produced. Instead, they realized a modified MBT-MR three-man turret without the driver could be made just as fast. At the same time, the Compact Turret designed by Clifford Bradley originally envisioned for the MBT-MR was considered for the M60/Shillelagh system. This unique type of turret is what the M60A2 eventually used, and the “A” and “B” models were alternate versions. The picture posted by Don "Dontos" Moriarty (RIP) is of M60 hull RN 9B4470 and has the “A” model Clifford Bradley designed turret, aka "Compact Turret". They eventually ended up on the T95 hulls that were used to test systems being developed for the MBT70/XM803. The T95 hulls being relegated to this duty when its program was cancelled in 1959. The three T95S turrets requested for the Shillelagh program were the T95/96 Turrets already produced for the T95 program and originally designed to have a fixed mount, no recoil, hypervelocity gun. They were modified to accept the M81 152mm Gun/Launcher and were installed on M48A1 gasser hulls to conduct test firing at White Sands Missile range by Aeronutronic Philco-Ford. Below are pictures of one conducting live fire tests. Once the M551 pilots were made these rigs were no longer needed.





About that M48 hull at Armada. I wrote a post years ago and ID'd it as having the "D" turret erroneously. The hull is one of the 6 M48A1’s converted to AVDS-1790 diesel and eventually became one of the two pilot M48A3’s. Here is a link to it: Pilot M48A3. The plaque installed in front of her is wrong. The only XM66 connection was the turret being used as a demonstrator for the D model turret. Here is a picture of 9B4470 with it:

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 5:01 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Doug,

I can say for certainty that the M48/T95 rig wasn't used for those tests. Anything else I'd have to unpack some boxes to find the info. Give me some time and eventually I'll be back on a normal routine. Right now I'm way to busy.

Nice to hear from you.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Sat Jul 01, 2023 10:34 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Doug,

Sorry for the long overdue reply. Checked my library and came up with this conclusion. In 1969 there were a very limited amount of M60A1E2's available. 300 were in storage until a satisfactory scavenge system was approved and implemented along with a plethora of other issues. The few available (approximately 14) were distributed between Knox, Aberdeen, Detroit, and Redstone, being used to develop/fix issues with the stabilization system, recoil mechanism, CBSS, FCS, and laser. The M551 was plentiful and capable of conducting these firings. It is highly unlikely they would have diverted any M60A1E2's for a test the M551 could just as satisfactorily conduct. If I find anything else to nail this down, I'll post it.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum