±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 427
Total: 427
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: CPGlang
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: CPGlang
06: Photo Gallery
07: Downloads
08: News Archive
09: CPGlang
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: Photo Gallery
13: Community Forums
14: Home
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Home
19: Home
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: CPGlang
24: Community Forums
25: Member Screenshots
26: Community Forums
27: Photo Gallery
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: CPGlang
33: News Archive
34: Member Screenshots
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: Home
39: Community Forums
40: Photo Gallery
41: Home
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Home
46: Community Forums
47: Photo Gallery
48: CPGlang
49: News Archive
50: Community Forums
51: Home
52: Community Forums
53: Home
54: Home
55: Photo Gallery
56: Photo Gallery
57: CPGlang
58: CPGlang
59: Photo Gallery
60: CPGlang
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Your Account
64: CPGlang
65: Home
66: CPGlang
67: Photo Gallery
68: News Archive
69: Community Forums
70: Photo Gallery
71: Community Forums
72: Photo Gallery
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Photo Gallery
76: Community Forums
77: Photo Gallery
78: Community Forums
79: Downloads
80: Community Forums
81: News Archive
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: News Archive
86: Community Forums
87: Home
88: Member Screenshots
89: Photo Gallery
90: Community Forums
91: Photo Gallery
92: Home
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Member Screenshots
96: CPGlang
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Community Forums
100: Home
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Home
104: Community Forums
105: Photo Gallery
106: Photo Gallery
107: Photo Gallery
108: Home
109: Community Forums
110: Photo Gallery
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: Home
114: CPGlang
115: Community Forums
116: CPGlang
117: Your Account
118: CPGlang
119: CPGlang
120: Community Forums
121: Your Account
122: Photo Gallery
123: CPGlang
124: News Archive
125: Downloads
126: Community Forums
127: CPGlang
128: Community Forums
129: Home
130: Downloads
131: Photo Gallery
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Home
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Community Forums
140: Member Screenshots
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: CPGlang
145: News Archive
146: Community Forums
147: Home
148: Photo Gallery
149: Community Forums
150: Home
151: Home
152: Home
153: Community Forums
154: Photo Gallery
155: Photo Gallery
156: Community Forums
157: Member Screenshots
158: Home
159: CPGlang
160: CPGlang
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Photo Gallery
164: Home
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Community Forums
168: CPGlang
169: Home
170: Statistics
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Community Forums
176: Home
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: Home
182: Community Forums
183: Home
184: Community Forums
185: CPGlang
186: Photo Gallery
187: CPGlang
188: CPGlang
189: Community Forums
190: Photo Gallery
191: Member Screenshots
192: Downloads
193: Photo Gallery
194: Photo Gallery
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Home
198: Photo Gallery
199: Home
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: News Archive
204: Home
205: CPGlang
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Photo Gallery
210: Photo Gallery
211: CPGlang
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Home
215: Home
216: CPGlang
217: Home
218: CPGlang
219: CPGlang
220: Member Screenshots
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Community Forums
224: Home
225: Community Forums
226: CPGlang
227: Community Forums
228: CPGlang
229: Community Forums
230: Home
231: Community Forums
232: CPGlang
233: CPGlang
234: CPGlang
235: Community Forums
236: Home
237: CPGlang
238: Community Forums
239: CPGlang
240: CPGlang
241: Member Screenshots
242: Photo Gallery
243: Home
244: Community Forums
245: CPGlang
246: CPGlang
247: Community Forums
248: CPGlang
249: Community Forums
250: CPGlang
251: Community Forums
252: CPGlang
253: Community Forums
254: Photo Gallery
255: Community Forums
256: Community Forums
257: Community Forums
258: Home
259: Community Forums
260: Home
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: CPGlang
264: Community Forums
265: Member Screenshots
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Photo Gallery
269: Community Forums
270: CPGlang
271: Photo Gallery
272: CPGlang
273: CPGlang
274: Photo Gallery
275: CPGlang
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: Community Forums
279: Home
280: Community Forums
281: Photo Gallery
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Home
285: CPGlang
286: CPGlang
287: Community Forums
288: Home
289: News Archive
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Home
293: Community Forums
294: Member Screenshots
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: News Archive
299: Community Forums
300: Home
301: Community Forums
302: Home
303: CPGlang
304: Community Forums
305: Photo Gallery
306: Community Forums
307: Community Forums
308: CPGlang
309: News Archive
310: Member Screenshots
311: Community Forums
312: Photo Gallery
313: Community Forums
314: Home
315: Community Forums
316: Home
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Photo Gallery
321: CPGlang
322: Community Forums
323: Community Forums
324: Community Forums
325: CPGlang
326: Community Forums
327: Community Forums
328: Community Forums
329: Home
330: Community Forums
331: Home
332: Community Forums
333: Community Forums
334: Community Forums
335: CPGlang
336: Home
337: Community Forums
338: Home
339: Home
340: CPGlang
341: Community Forums
342: News Archive
343: CPGlang
344: CPGlang
345: Community Forums
346: Community Forums
347: Community Forums
348: News
349: Community Forums
350: Community Forums
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Community Forums
354: Statistics
355: Photo Gallery
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Photo Gallery
359: Photo Gallery
360: Home
361: Community Forums
362: Community Forums
363: Community Forums
364: Community Forums
365: Community Forums
366: Community Forums
367: Member Screenshots
368: Home
369: Community Forums
370: Home
371: Community Forums
372: Community Forums
373: Member Screenshots
374: Photo Gallery
375: Photo Gallery
376: Community Forums
377: Community Forums
378: Community Forums
379: Home
380: Community Forums
381: Community Forums
382: Home
383: Community Forums
384: Community Forums
385: Community Forums
386: CPGlang
387: Home
388: Community Forums
389: Photo Gallery
390: Photo Gallery
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: Community Forums
394: Photo Gallery
395: Home
396: Community Forums
397: CPGlang
398: News Archive
399: CPGlang
400: Community Forums
401: Community Forums
402: Home
403: Statistics
404: Community Forums
405: Community Forums
406: CPGlang
407: Community Forums
408: CPGlang
409: Member Screenshots
410: CPGlang
411: CPGlang
412: Community Forums
413: Community Forums
414: Community Forums
415: Member Screenshots
416: Photo Gallery
417: News Archive
418: Community Forums
419: Community Forums
420: Community Forums
421: Community Forums
422: Community Forums
423: CPGlang
424: Community Forums
425: Community Forums
426: Community Forums
427: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
XM 66 Tank Proposal
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:51 pm
Post subject: XM 66 Tank Proposal

This is a 'spin-off' Vehicle from the T95 Program.



Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:11 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Interesting - You say it was a spinoff of teh T95 program. Where does this fit in the M60A2 genisis? The picture looks like an M6A1E1 or M60A2. Could it be that the Army decided that it would be easier to get the program survive by either giving it a new designator (XM66) or developing it as a member of the M60 family

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
tanker2010
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: 264
Location: Kansas City, Mo.
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:30 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

It does have a strange hull. While it has the shape and fenders of a M60, it has 5 return rollers.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:37 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

The turret is similiar to the T95 test bed at the LST buiding.
(NOTE: The 20mm gun is removed, but mount location is obvious)





This is around the time of the M60A2 development.

Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:12 am
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

XM66 is the now known as M60A2 program.

That's a poor picture of M60 hull 9B4470 with the proposed "A" model turret. I think I posted a copy of it a while back.

In it's early stages the adaptation of the 152mm gun/launcher to the M60 was called the XM66. They reviewed 4 turret types, A, B, C, and D. "A" and "B" were similar compact types, with the "B" model being taller. The "C" model was very similar in appearance to an over grown M551 turret, and the "D" was a modified M60A1 turret with shorter rear. In early 1965 they changed the program name to M60A1E1. The "B" model ended up being selected and eventually became the M60A2.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Andrei
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Posts: 81

PostPosted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 3:19 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Interesting if any alternative armament options were considered for XM 66 or M60A2 at the initial development (60s), later they considered 120 mm US and British guns, as well as M68.
Back to top
View user's profile
Harold_Biondo
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 11, 2021
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2022 6:17 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

- Joe_D
XM66 is the now known as M60A2 program.

That's a poor picture of M60 hull 9B4470 with the proposed "A" model turret. I think I posted a copy of it a while back.

In it's early stages the adaptation of the 152mm gun/launcher to the M60 was called the XM66. They reviewed 4 turret types, A, B, C, and D. "A" and "B" were similar compact types, with the "B" model being taller. The "C" model was very similar in appearance to an over grown M551 turret, and the "D" was a modified M60A1 turret with shorter rear. In early 1965 they changed the program name to M60A1E1. The "B" model ended up being selected and eventually became the M60A2.


If this was referring to the tank that is in Armada Michigan, that is not in fact the XM66D (or A, in this case) turret, it is the T95S turret. S standing for Shillelagh. There was some cross-pollination going on between the M60A2 and T95 programs. The actual description of the XM66D does not match up with the T95 turret. The tank in Armada was built from the beginning on the M48 chassis, according to the original work order for it I found in the archives. The T95 and M60 hulls with T95S turrets were separate individuals entirely, since three T95S turrets were built, according to Hunnicut.
Back to top
View user's profile
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2023 4:08 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Harold and welcome.

The tank in Armada Michigan has the old Main Battle Tank - Medium Range (MBT-MR) turret installed. That’s why it has the driver in the turret position. This was the progenitor to the MBT70/XM803 program and envisioned as early as 1958. It was used as an ersatz "D" model turret demonstrator for what was to become the M60A2. The "D" model turret proposed in 1961 was supposed to be a basic M60A1 turret modified to accept the 152mm gun/launcher and associated equipment. None were produced. Instead, they realized a modified MBT-MR three-man turret without the driver could be made just as fast. At the same time, the Compact Turret designed by Clifford Bradley originally envisioned for the MBT-MR was considered for the M60/Shillelagh system. This unique type of turret is what the M60A2 eventually used, and the “A” and “B” models were alternate versions. The picture posted by Don "Dontos" Moriarty (RIP) is of M60 hull RN 9B4470 and has the “A” model Clifford Bradley designed turret, aka "Compact Turret". They eventually ended up on the T95 hulls that were used to test systems being developed for the MBT70/XM803. The T95 hulls being relegated to this duty when its program was cancelled in 1959. The three T95S turrets requested for the Shillelagh program were the T95/96 Turrets already produced for the T95 program and originally designed to have a fixed mount, no recoil, hypervelocity gun. They were modified to accept the M81 152mm Gun/Launcher and were installed on M48A1 gasser hulls to conduct test firing at White Sands Missile range by Aeronutronic Philco-Ford. Below are pictures of one conducting live fire tests. Once the M551 pilots were made these rigs were no longer needed.





About that M48 hull at Armada. I wrote a post years ago and ID'd it as having the "D" turret erroneously. The hull is one of the 6 M48A1’s converted to AVDS-1790 diesel and eventually became one of the two pilot M48A3’s. Here is a link to it: Pilot M48A3. The plaque installed in front of her is wrong. The only XM66 connection was the turret being used as a demonstrator for the D model turret. Here is a picture of 9B4470 with it:


_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 7:57 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Joe! Thanks for checking in. With regard to the test rig shown in Don's old post...do you know if MICOM was using that or a similar rig? Was any firing done at Redstone or if part of a MICOM operation, perfomed exclusively at White Sands? I've been trying to establish what platform was being used in the tests that were referred to by MICOM reps at a 1969 meeting at Ft. Knox. They assiduously avoided any use of or comment on Shillelagh launches involving an actual Sheridan. There are two tests in particular I'm interested in: First was a "shoot-off" between Shillelagh and M60A1. Second was a series of Missile Readiness firings they cited to anybody who would listen....503 missiles, 91% successful hit rate. It was a lie and 162 of those missiles were not even fired.
I'd love to know if this was the rig likely in use?
Best regards,
D.

- Joe_D
Hi Harold and welcome.

The tank in Armada Michigan has the old Main Battle Tank - Medium Range (MBT-MR) turret installed. That’s why it has the driver in the turret position. This was the progenitor to the MBT70/XM803 program and envisioned as early as 1958. It was used as an ersatz "D" model turret demonstrator for what was to become the M60A2. The "D" model turret proposed in 1961 was supposed to be a basic M60A1 turret modified to accept the 152mm gun/launcher and associated equipment. None were produced. Instead, they realized a modified MBT-MR three-man turret without the driver could be made just as fast. At the same time, the Compact Turret designed by Clifford Bradley originally envisioned for the MBT-MR was considered for the M60/Shillelagh system. This unique type of turret is what the M60A2 eventually used, and the “A” and “B” models were alternate versions. The picture posted by Don "Dontos" Moriarty (RIP) is of M60 hull RN 9B4470 and has the “A” model Clifford Bradley designed turret, aka "Compact Turret". They eventually ended up on the T95 hulls that were used to test systems being developed for the MBT70/XM803. The T95 hulls being relegated to this duty when its program was cancelled in 1959. The three T95S turrets requested for the Shillelagh program were the T95/96 Turrets already produced for the T95 program and originally designed to have a fixed mount, no recoil, hypervelocity gun. They were modified to accept the M81 152mm Gun/Launcher and were installed on M48A1 gasser hulls to conduct test firing at White Sands Missile range by Aeronutronic Philco-Ford. Below are pictures of one conducting live fire tests. Once the M551 pilots were made these rigs were no longer needed.





About that M48 hull at Armada. I wrote a post years ago and ID'd it as having the "D" turret erroneously. The hull is one of the 6 M48A1’s converted to AVDS-1790 diesel and eventually became one of the two pilot M48A3’s. Here is a link to it: Pilot M48A3. The plaque installed in front of her is wrong. The only XM66 connection was the turret being used as a demonstrator for the D model turret. Here is a picture of 9B4470 with it:

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 5:01 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Hi Doug,

I can say for certainty that the M48/T95 rig wasn't used for those tests. Anything else I'd have to unpack some boxes to find the info. Give me some time and eventually I'll be back on a normal routine. Right now I'm way to busy.

Nice to hear from you.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Sat Jul 01, 2023 10:34 pm
Post subject: Re: XM 66 Tank Proposal

Doug,

Sorry for the long overdue reply. Checked my library and came up with this conclusion. In 1969 there were a very limited amount of M60A1E2's available. 300 were in storage until a satisfactory scavenge system was approved and implemented along with a plethora of other issues. The few available (approximately 14) were distributed between Knox, Aberdeen, Detroit, and Redstone, being used to develop/fix issues with the stabilization system, recoil mechanism, CBSS, FCS, and laser. The M551 was plentiful and capable of conducting these firings. It is highly unlikely they would have diverted any M60A1E2's for a test the M551 could just as satisfactorily conduct. If I find anything else to nail this down, I'll post it.

_________________
Joe_D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum