±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 690
Total: 690
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Photo Gallery
02: Home
03: Home
04: News Archive
05: Member Screenshots
06: Community Forums
07: Photo Gallery
08: Community Forums
09: Downloads
10: Home
11: Home
12: Photo Gallery
13: Community Forums
14: Home
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Photo Gallery
18: Community Forums
19: Photo Gallery
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Member Screenshots
23: Photo Gallery
24: Home
25: Home
26: Downloads
27: Home
28: Home
29: Home
30: Downloads
31: Downloads
32: News Archive
33: Photo Gallery
34: Photo Gallery
35: Community Forums
36: Downloads
37: Member Screenshots
38: Photo Gallery
39: Photo Gallery
40: Member Screenshots
41: Downloads
42: Home
43: Home
44: Photo Gallery
45: Home
46: Home
47: Photo Gallery
48: Member Screenshots
49: Home
50: News Archive
51: Member Screenshots
52: Photo Gallery
53: Member Screenshots
54: Photo Gallery
55: Community Forums
56: Home
57: Downloads
58: Photo Gallery
59: Photo Gallery
60: Member Screenshots
61: Downloads
62: Home
63: Member Screenshots
64: Community Forums
65: Photo Gallery
66: Member Screenshots
67: Home
68: Photo Gallery
69: Downloads
70: Photo Gallery
71: Home
72: Downloads
73: Member Screenshots
74: Home
75: Home
76: Community Forums
77: Home
78: Downloads
79: Photo Gallery
80: Statistics
81: Home
82: Downloads
83: Photo Gallery
84: Downloads
85: Home
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Photo Gallery
89: Community Forums
90: Home
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Home
95: Downloads
96: Home
97: News Archive
98: Photo Gallery
99: Member Screenshots
100: Member Screenshots
101: Community Forums
102: News
103: Photo Gallery
104: Community Forums
105: Home
106: Member Screenshots
107: Home
108: Downloads
109: Photo Gallery
110: Member Screenshots
111: Home
112: Downloads
113: Photo Gallery
114: Home
115: Photo Gallery
116: Home
117: Photo Gallery
118: Photo Gallery
119: Photo Gallery
120: Downloads
121: Downloads
122: Photo Gallery
123: Member Screenshots
124: Member Screenshots
125: Home
126: Home
127: Photo Gallery
128: Photo Gallery
129: Photo Gallery
130: Downloads
131: Community Forums
132: Statistics
133: Member Screenshots
134: Member Screenshots
135: Home
136: Community Forums
137: Home
138: Community Forums
139: Home
140: Community Forums
141: Home
142: Photo Gallery
143: Community Forums
144: Your Account
145: Home
146: Member Screenshots
147: Photo Gallery
148: Downloads
149: Home
150: Member Screenshots
151: Home
152: Photo Gallery
153: Member Screenshots
154: Home
155: Downloads
156: Home
157: Statistics
158: Home
159: Member Screenshots
160: Home
161: Home
162: Photo Gallery
163: Photo Gallery
164: Home
165: Home
166: Photo Gallery
167: Downloads
168: Photo Gallery
169: Community Forums
170: Home
171: Community Forums
172: Home
173: Photo Gallery
174: Community Forums
175: Home
176: Statistics
177: Photo Gallery
178: Home
179: Home
180: Downloads
181: Home
182: Downloads
183: Member Screenshots
184: Your Account
185: Home
186: Photo Gallery
187: Member Screenshots
188: Downloads
189: Home
190: Community Forums
191: Photo Gallery
192: Statistics
193: Home
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Statistics
197: Home
198: Home
199: Contact
200: Home
201: Home
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Home
206: Community Forums
207: Home
208: Member Screenshots
209: Community Forums
210: Community Forums
211: Member Screenshots
212: Photo Gallery
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: News
216: Downloads
217: Home
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Home
221: Home
222: Photo Gallery
223: Community Forums
224: Home
225: Photo Gallery
226: Home
227: Home
228: Home
229: Home
230: Home
231: Home
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Home
235: Community Forums
236: Home
237: Home
238: Home
239: Home
240: Home
241: Photo Gallery
242: Home
243: Member Screenshots
244: Home
245: Home
246: Downloads
247: Home
248: Home
249: Community Forums
250: Member Screenshots
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Downloads
255: Home
256: Community Forums
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Home
260: Downloads
261: Home
262: Home
263: Home
264: Downloads
265: Community Forums
266: Home
267: Home
268: Home
269: Community Forums
270: Photo Gallery
271: Photo Gallery
272: Home
273: Home
274: Photo Gallery
275: Photo Gallery
276: Member Screenshots
277: Home
278: Your Account
279: Home
280: Home
281: Home
282: Home
283: Home
284: Community Forums
285: Home
286: Home
287: Member Screenshots
288: Home
289: Photo Gallery
290: Home
291: Community Forums
292: Home
293: Home
294: Home
295: Home
296: Member Screenshots
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: News Archive
300: Statistics
301: Home
302: Home
303: Home
304: Home
305: Home
306: Photo Gallery
307: Home
308: Community Forums
309: Community Forums
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Photo Gallery
313: Home
314: Community Forums
315: Your Account
316: Home
317: Member Screenshots
318: Home
319: Home
320: Home
321: Photo Gallery
322: Home
323: Downloads
324: Downloads
325: Photo Gallery
326: Home
327: Home
328: Home
329: Home
330: Photo Gallery
331: Community Forums
332: Photo Gallery
333: Home
334: Member Screenshots
335: Photo Gallery
336: Community Forums
337: Home
338: Your Account
339: Member Screenshots
340: Home
341: Home
342: Community Forums
343: Photo Gallery
344: Community Forums
345: Community Forums
346: Community Forums
347: Home
348: Home
349: Home
350: Home
351: Home
352: Community Forums
353: Home
354: Home
355: Community Forums
356: Home
357: Community Forums
358: Community Forums
359: Home
360: Photo Gallery
361: Member Screenshots
362: Home
363: Community Forums
364: Home
365: Photo Gallery
366: Statistics
367: Photo Gallery
368: Community Forums
369: Home
370: Home
371: Home
372: Home
373: Downloads
374: Home
375: Home
376: Home
377: Community Forums
378: Home
379: Photo Gallery
380: Home
381: Community Forums
382: Photo Gallery
383: Home
384: Photo Gallery
385: Home
386: Member Screenshots
387: Community Forums
388: Home
389: Home
390: Member Screenshots
391: Photo Gallery
392: Home
393: Home
394: News Archive
395: Home
396: Home
397: Member Screenshots
398: Community Forums
399: Member Screenshots
400: Photo Gallery
401: Community Forums
402: Home
403: Community Forums
404: Community Forums
405: Home
406: Community Forums
407: Home
408: Home
409: Community Forums
410: Home
411: Home
412: Home
413: Home
414: Home
415: Home
416: Your Account
417: Home
418: Home
419: Home
420: Home
421: Community Forums
422: Home
423: Home
424: Home
425: Home
426: Photo Gallery
427: Home
428: Community Forums
429: Downloads
430: Community Forums
431: Community Forums
432: Community Forums
433: News
434: Community Forums
435: Community Forums
436: Home
437: Community Forums
438: Community Forums
439: Home
440: Community Forums
441: Community Forums
442: Community Forums
443: Home
444: Home
445: Community Forums
446: Photo Gallery
447: Member Screenshots
448: Home
449: Member Screenshots
450: Home
451: Downloads
452: Home
453: Community Forums
454: Photo Gallery
455: Photo Gallery
456: Photo Gallery
457: Photo Gallery
458: Community Forums
459: Home
460: Photo Gallery
461: Home
462: News
463: Community Forums
464: Home
465: Community Forums
466: Community Forums
467: Home
468: Community Forums
469: Downloads
470: Downloads
471: Community Forums
472: Home
473: Community Forums
474: Home
475: News
476: Home
477: Home
478: Downloads
479: Community Forums
480: Community Forums
481: Community Forums
482: Community Forums
483: Home
484: Home
485: Home
486: Community Forums
487: Home
488: Your Account
489: Home
490: Home
491: Photo Gallery
492: Home
493: Community Forums
494: Home
495: Photo Gallery
496: Community Forums
497: Community Forums
498: Home
499: Home
500: Community Forums
501: Member Screenshots
502: Downloads
503: Home
504: Home
505: Home
506: Home
507: Member Screenshots
508: Community Forums
509: Community Forums
510: Community Forums
511: Community Forums
512: Community Forums
513: Photo Gallery
514: Home
515: Downloads
516: Community Forums
517: Downloads
518: Community Forums
519: Home
520: Home
521: Home
522: News
523: Community Forums
524: Community Forums
525: Downloads
526: Home
527: Community Forums
528: Home
529: Member Screenshots
530: Downloads
531: Downloads
532: Downloads
533: Community Forums
534: Home
535: Home
536: Your Account
537: Photo Gallery
538: Home
539: Community Forums
540: Community Forums
541: Home
542: Home
543: Downloads
544: Community Forums
545: Home
546: Community Forums
547: Community Forums
548: Community Forums
549: Community Forums
550: Member Screenshots
551: Home
552: Home
553: Community Forums
554: Home
555: Community Forums
556: Home
557: Community Forums
558: Community Forums
559: Community Forums
560: Community Forums
561: Home
562: Statistics
563: Community Forums
564: Community Forums
565: Home
566: Home
567: Photo Gallery
568: Home
569: Home
570: Member Screenshots
571: Home
572: Community Forums
573: Home
574: Community Forums
575: Home
576: Home
577: Community Forums
578: Home
579: Community Forums
580: Community Forums
581: Community Forums
582: Home
583: Home
584: News Archive
585: Home
586: Member Screenshots
587: Home
588: Member Screenshots
589: Home
590: Home
591: Contact
592: Home
593: Community Forums
594: Home
595: Home
596: Home
597: Downloads
598: Community Forums
599: Community Forums
600: Member Screenshots
601: Community Forums
602: Community Forums
603: Home
604: Home
605: Member Screenshots
606: Home
607: Home
608: Community Forums
609: Your Account
610: Home
611: Community Forums
612: Community Forums
613: Community Forums
614: Community Forums
615: Community Forums
616: Home
617: Home
618: Home
619: Home
620: Home
621: Member Screenshots
622: Photo Gallery
623: Community Forums
624: Home
625: Home
626: Community Forums
627: Community Forums
628: Community Forums
629: Home
630: Home
631: Photo Gallery
632: Home
633: Member Screenshots
634: Community Forums
635: Home
636: Member Screenshots
637: Home
638: Home
639: Home
640: Community Forums
641: Home
642: Community Forums
643: Community Forums
644: Community Forums
645: Home
646: Member Screenshots
647: Home
648: Member Screenshots
649: Community Forums
650: Photo Gallery
651: Home
652: Home
653: Contact
654: Home
655: Your Account
656: Home
657: Community Forums
658: Home
659: Home
660: Community Forums
661: Community Forums
662: Home
663: Home
664: Statistics
665: Community Forums
666: Downloads
667: Member Screenshots
668: Photo Gallery
669: Home
670: Home
671: Community Forums
672: Member Screenshots
673: Community Forums
674: Community Forums
675: Home
676: Downloads
677: Member Screenshots
678: Community Forums
679: Home
680: Community Forums
681: Home
682: Home
683: Home
684: Home
685: Home
686: Home
687: Home
688: Member Screenshots
689: Member Screenshots
690: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical value"?
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:43 pm
Post subject: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical value"?

Question for former Army museum employees & volunteers: in your experience, is there a distinction between artifacts that are useful for soldier training and those of historical value? I dont see the distinction, particularly if you are training soldiers on the history of their branch...

But that's the baby the Senate Armed Services Committee is asking the Army to try to divide for the Armor/Ordnance/ADA collections. That being said, the intent of the language below is to enable the "historical" artifacts to be put on public display at privately-funded museums (vs the "training" artifacts that will be stored for soldier training at facilities paid for with public funds). Unfortunately, the committee is opposed to using public funds to enable public access.

Maybe (hopefully?) the Army will use this distinction to recreate what existed at Fort Knox with the Patton Museum vs Richardson Motor Pool? Who knows...

www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/...srpt26.pdf

"Storage of Army artifacts
The fiscal year 2011 budget request for the Department of the Army recommended funding in Military Construction, Army, for three climate controlled storage buildings at Forts Benning, Lee, and Sill. These facilities were intended to support movement of Army macro-artifacts which were following Training and Doctrine Command schools re-locating as part of the Base Closure and Realignment 2005 process. Although the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383) did not authorize these projects, the committee supports the requirement to protect and preserve these historical collections.

"The committee has encouraged the Army to investigate all options for facility solutions. The committee encourages the Army to pursue the solutions that best address the priorities the Army has identified and that are the most fiscally prudent from a life cycle standpoint. Therefore, the committee directs the Army to complete its review of all options under consideration and provide a report to the committee not later than September 30, 2011, on its preferred solution set. The report shall contain, at a minimum, the following:
1. The Army’s requirements and priorities with respect to storing these artifacts;
2. Identification of various solution sets and a business case analysis for each course of action, as well as identifying any legal or regulatory barriers for the different options;
3. Estimates for the life cycle cost to the government for each option;
4. The expected cost and implications of not providing appropriate storage locations for the artifacts;
5. The Army’s recommendation for the appropriate option at each installation;
6. Any necessary legislative changes necessary to dispose of any artifacts that are not deemed to be of national historic significance; and
7. Delineation and listing of all artifacts to be stored, with special emphasis on those that are to be used for training and in what context, and those that merely have historical value as an artifact.

"With respect to the Army’s preferred option for each of the three installations, the committee notes that it does not and will not support the use of any appropriated funds being used to build or support a public museum."
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:52 pm
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical valu

just a note : it is good to read this, because it shows that the Senate is preoccupated by the fate of these historical artifacts.

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
TrevorLarkum
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 16, 2007
Posts: 1596
Location: Northampton, England
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 7:35 pm
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical value"?

Maybe we should set up an AFVNDG warehouse in the US to take any 'spare' vehicles that the Army doesn't want...

_________________
Trevor

Dr Trevor Larkum
Preserved Tanks: PreservedTanks.com
Armour Archive: ArmourArchive.co.uk
EVs
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 8:38 pm
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical value"?

Don, Bob, Garry,
Any comments?
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 12:06 am
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical value"?

My fear is that anything supplied to a private museum will end up at a 'Museum' like the VMMV or the one in Florida that bought the collection from Hubbard OH.

Yes there are some good collections but most are the projects of individuals and subject to the vagries of life. Good intentions run up against tough budgets, wills and probate, divorce and even fraud. Maybe I am glad the Czech T35 went home instead of staying at the Ordinance Museum

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 12:52 am
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical value"?

Bob,
The report seems (or at least tries) to distinguish amongst three different types of artifacts:
1) Those "not deemed to be of national historic significance" - these items could well be given away to various museums like you said.
2) Those of "national historic significance" - these items would remain Army property, but would be displayed at co-located (or nearby) museums - akin to the old Patton Museum, and to a lesser degree the Ordnance Museum.
3) Those "to be used for training" - these items would be stored at publicly-funded storage facility, for use by soldiers.

I suspect the artifacts falling under #1 will be relatively few - or at least that's what I can only hope the Army will say.

My primary curiousity/concern regards #2 & #3 - I dont see the distinction.

For those that worked & volunteered at the old museums, I am curious if you saw any practical distinction between artifacts that were used to train soldiers and "historical" artifacts displayed merely for public benefit. Seems to me soldiers are/were trained on the same historical items... But I could be wrong...

Neil

I believe the intent would still be to have a privately funded "museum" co-located (or nearby) the publicly-funded
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 11:06 am
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical value"?

Hi Folks!

My bet is when it's done and over with, all of the artifacts will be left out in the rain.

There is NO difference between #2 and #3.

The last time I was at the Ft Bliss museum, a Capt and a 1st Sgt came by. They were from a NG Air Defense unit. They were going to bring they unit by for a look at the Air Defense items still at the museum. Training is walking around a item and looking at it. Hopefully someone knows some history about it and can tell the troops. Next day, a family stops by and walks around the same item. Both the troops and the family do the same thing. They look and learn.

I somehow get the feeling that some one is thinking the troops get on or in an item and do something with it.

My 2 cents.
Sgt, Scouts out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 12:29 pm
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical value"?

Neil

The only thing I can offer is the personal view point that the 'training tool' excuse has been far over-used by Army Officials.

A few soldiers going thru the museum once a month is not viable training experience but an excuse for a day away from the normal routine.

Is there any sort of training plan? (NO!)
"Task, Conditions, & Standards" (NO!)
Pre or post training testing ? (NO!)

These are (or at least were) minimum requirements for a basic training session.

Oh yeah, a bunch of young "LTs" climbing on old tanks after having their 'threat' class was always fun to babysit. They tended to do more harm to subject vehicles than any sort of beneficial training value. This is why we colocated all the Soviet/Russian vehicles together. Those were realistically the only vehicles that gave them any sort of training value.

The greatest casualty to this whole episode? The general public, veterans, and their families. And then there is the volunteers.

Volunteers spend (or have spent) Thousands of man hours to preserve or restore vehicles (utilizing private &/or personal funds) for public display & exhibitions that draw thousands of interested veterans, families, and enthusists.

The greatest success of the Ft Knox Armor Museum (ie old Patton Museum), was the ability of seeing, touching, smelling, and hearing Armor History. That is now gone for the most part and the ability of experiencing history in such a manner is now only possible through private collection museums.

a few items to consider....
What is Historical property? technically anything is....(no clear answer there!)

'Publically Funded Storage Facility" is a government built garage. A building that houses equipment. (There seems to be no interest in preservation or historical presentation.)

Sadly, the future seems to be bleak for any sort of "World Class Armor Museum" BRAC 05 destroyed an institution its history. Its too late to get any of that back, and there is no interest or funding for a future institution. THAT is the crime of this whole episode.

Of course this is merely my personal opinion.... Sorry for the ranting, I'll shut up now...

Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 8:47 pm
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical value"?

Okay now that I vented

I can see someone deciding that anything from the late cold war is to be kept as a 'training aid' "So we can show the troops the weak spots, strengths, how to defend against it, etc". Fiberglass models would be about as useful (and a whole lot cheaper to maintain) if you just want to show the troops what a Panther or a Tiger looked like and how it compared to a Sherman or Stuart. And do Ordnance troops today even need to know that? They are only interested in recovering repairing and maintaining tanks. It took over 10 years for the Recovery Branch of the Ordnance school to move the Elefant one mile! (And eventually it was accomplished in the manner I suggested nine years ago - You embarrass the leaders - I suggested a bar bet with the senior NCOs, it was done by the Base Commander in a staff meeting to the OIC of the recovery Branch)

Another example - I used to make a point to groups about how bad the interleaved roadwheels of the Panther were for maintenance. A training aid set up with interleaved wheels that you could actually have trainees swap out the inside center wheel will make as much impression as showing them and telling them how unmaintanable they were compared to the spaced wheels of a T-34 or T-72 or a VVSS unit of a Sherman.

The older vehicles were more of professional interest to the designers and engineers who were developing the next generation by looking at how previous developers solved problems. But those folks aren't at Ft Lee or Benning so what training purpose do the vehicles serve there?

Their purpose is in building esprit, keeping the public enthused, having trophies to show off. And that isn't done by locking them away in a training area where only professionals who have already made a commitment can see them. They serve a major purpose by being down the center of the main road into the base where a 9 year old can be driven by them and think WOW and be in a place where a grandfather can bring his grand children and tell them 'that is what I did in the great war' Or where a group of Cub Scouts can walk around them and look at the gouges where rounds bounced off while a docent tells the story of a last ditch fruitless defense

A few will be deemed 'of national historic significance' (and probably for all the wrong reasons) Things like Patton's command truck, Cobra King (hopefully) Some M1 Combat car that they have a picture of Patton or Rose or someone else famous in Maybe some of the one of a kinds from the 20s and 30s. A few Shermans, Maybe some M-48s painted up like they were in Vietnam. You know as well as I do they have very few records on the vehicles at Aberdeen to be able to tell much about specific vehicles and what their 'significance is' The Tiger I (if it ever comes back) and the JagdTiger that we have photographic evidence of when and where it was captured may be some of the best documented. Will they keep the two Ordnance Museum Panthers side by side so someone can show the improvements made between early and late production? I doubt it.

Then there will be a lot put on the block for units or bases to request as monuments. Then they will start accepting requests from museums, probably based on who knows which Senator. Some will hopefully be well cared for and made available for some folks to see. Others will end up as trophies or playtoys for fatcats to show off to their friends and pat themselves on the back about how they are 'saving history'

The intellectual midgets that we have making these decisions in DC only think of what they can do to embarrass members of the other party and blame the previous administration for all the problems They want a 'feel good' sound bite that they will forget before the next reporter talks to them

I guess I just vented again

In actuality the 'training tool' excuse has always just been politically correct lip service used to justify the keeping of trophies. Everyone knew why they were being kept, they were being kept to show off to family and friends, Show the Taxpayer what their sacrifices (back in the big war) were for and be a center of pride for the organization. Well someone is now enforcing 'the letter of the law'. This is the 21st century version of the WWII and Korean war scrap drives

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 11:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical value"?

Interesting feedback. I suppose my hope is that the Army will say that most (if not almost all) artifacts have national historic value, but are not needed for direct soldier training per see... Setting them up for display at museums co-located at Benning, Lee and Sill.

My fear is that the collections will end up slit between the privately-funded museum and the publicly-funded storage facilities - with the latter (ironically) not accessible by the public.

BTW, I am told there is one particular well-known Senator that is firmly opposed to using public funds for public access (ie museums). The same Senator that rails against pork barrel spending on a regular basis...
Back to top
View user's profile
ShermanWasRight
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 18, 2009
Posts: 165
Location: Central Ohio/Northern Kentucky
PostPosted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 2:07 am
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical valu

I find the disdain for private museums here interesting, as it's quite the opposite of what I've seen among warbird enthusiasts-they love the "free market approach."

Of course, I agree with the opinion here; "preserving" history in someone's garage/hangar that the public only sees 5 days a year is next to worthless. Unfortunately I don't really know that I can offer any real solutions to the problem-it's hard even for me as someone who loves history to think that these vehicles could be used for training modern soldiers in any real fashion.

^^^^the storage facilites being off limits for "security reasons," of course, like the numerous gateguards at airbases across the country Rolling Eyes . The freaking Iranian planespotters have better access to their air force than I do, based on what I see on airliners.net. If I asked the USAF for permission to take pictures of their birds at, say, Rickenbacker, the chances are good they'd tell me about all the security/OPSEC risks before they then said no.
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 2:06 pm
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical value"?

Keep in mind that you can go to an airshow once (or a few times) a year to see privately restored warbirds, and you can also go almost any day a year to an aviation museum.

That balance has been upset for the AFV world in the US. You can still go to the open houses to see privately restored vehicles, but the two largest AFV museum collections are now in storage.

It would be akin to having the Air & Space Museum and USAF Museum collections in storage at the same time due to impending - and as yet uncertain and unfunded - moves.
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 5:00 pm
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical valu

And keep in mind that while the country groans under crushing debt and the DoD creaks under indecipherable accounting practices, we're "saving money" by moving an entire branch (or two) of the army at considerable expense, yet "closing" nothing under BRAC in the move. To say nothing of leaving behind an essentially empty and amortized museum that was well suited to it's task while it's key displays are left to rot out of public view for who-knows-how long?

A new museum (if, in fact, one is ever started, let alone completed) will cost many millions. I predict we will not see such a facility for at least ten years...and I'm skeptical that it will ever happen.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 6:44 pm
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical value"?

....and to think some 'Brain Surgeon' decided that moving the Armor Center from Ft Knox (that has well developed training ranges and additional available 'unused' land) to Ft Benning (that had to expand to include currently unusable land for armor training...and now may have to export personnel to locations to conduct actual basic & advanced armor training...!?) due to the fact it was 'cheaper'!? WTF!!

I got to quit commenting, this is getting my elevated blood pressure even higher !! (Wheres my B.P. pills !!)

Oh well, such is life
Regards
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 7:02 pm
Post subject: Re: Army Museum artifacts for "training" vs "historical value"?

- Dontos
....and to think some 'Brain Surgeon' decided that moving the Armor Center from Ft Knox (that has well developed training ranges and additional available 'unused' land) to Ft Benning (that had to expand to include currently unusable land for armor training...and now may have to export personnel to locations to conduct actual basic & advanced armor training...!?) due to the fact it was 'cheaper'!? WTF!!

Don


The ultimate irony will be when they starting sending people TDY from Benning to Knox to conduct training on facilities that Benning doesn't have.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum