±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 916
Total: 916
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Home
03: Community Forums
04: Photo Gallery
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: Photo Gallery
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: LinkToUs
13: Member Screenshots
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Photo Gallery
17: Community Forums
18: News
19: News Archive
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Home
24: Community Forums
25: Photo Gallery
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Photo Gallery
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Statistics
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Statistics
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Member Screenshots
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Photo Gallery
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Member Screenshots
58: Home
59: Community Forums
60: Photo Gallery
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Home
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: Home
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Community Forums
74: Home
75: Home
76: Community Forums
77: Home
78: Statistics
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Home
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: Member Screenshots
85: Community Forums
86: Supporters
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Member Screenshots
100: Member Screenshots
101: Home
102: Home
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Downloads
113: Home
114: Photo Gallery
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: News Archive
118: Member Screenshots
119: Community Forums
120: Home
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Community Forums
124: Member Screenshots
125: Community Forums
126: Home
127: Community Forums
128: Home
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Photo Gallery
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Statistics
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Downloads
150: Photo Gallery
151: Photo Gallery
152: Community Forums
153: Photo Gallery
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Photo Gallery
160: Home
161: Photo Gallery
162: Community Forums
163: Member Screenshots
164: Home
165: Your Account
166: Community Forums
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Photo Gallery
171: Member Screenshots
172: Community Forums
173: News Archive
174: Home
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Photo Gallery
178: Downloads
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: Community Forums
182: Photo Gallery
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Photo Gallery
187: Community Forums
188: Community Forums
189: Photo Gallery
190: Community Forums
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Photo Gallery
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Member Screenshots
201: Community Forums
202: Home
203: Home
204: Home
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Member Screenshots
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Downloads
221: Home
222: Community Forums
223: Home
224: News Archive
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: Home
230: Home
231: Downloads
232: Photo Gallery
233: Photo Gallery
234: Community Forums
235: Home
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Home
242: Home
243: Community Forums
244: Member Screenshots
245: Community Forums
246: Statistics
247: Community Forums
248: News Archive
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Photo Gallery
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: Community Forums
256: Member Screenshots
257: Home
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Home
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: News
267: Home
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Home
271: Home
272: Community Forums
273: Photo Gallery
274: Home
275: Member Screenshots
276: News
277: Community Forums
278: Home
279: Photo Gallery
280: Home
281: Community Forums
282: Community Forums
283: News Archive
284: Community Forums
285: Home
286: Your Account
287: Home
288: Community Forums
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Home
292: Downloads
293: Community Forums
294: Photo Gallery
295: Community Forums
296: Downloads
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Member Screenshots
300: Community Forums
301: Member Screenshots
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Photo Gallery
305: Member Screenshots
306: News Archive
307: Home
308: Member Screenshots
309: Community Forums
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Home
313: Community Forums
314: Community Forums
315: Home
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Member Screenshots
319: Community Forums
320: Home
321: Home
322: Community Forums
323: Home
324: Community Forums
325: Community Forums
326: Community Forums
327: Photo Gallery
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: Home
331: Community Forums
332: Home
333: Photo Gallery
334: Downloads
335: Home
336: Home
337: Community Forums
338: Home
339: Community Forums
340: Community Forums
341: Home
342: Your Account
343: Member Screenshots
344: Community Forums
345: Home
346: Community Forums
347: Community Forums
348: Home
349: Home
350: Community Forums
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Community Forums
354: Home
355: Community Forums
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Community Forums
359: Photo Gallery
360: Home
361: Community Forums
362: Home
363: Community Forums
364: Community Forums
365: Community Forums
366: Statistics
367: Community Forums
368: Community Forums
369: Home
370: Community Forums
371: Community Forums
372: Home
373: Home
374: Photo Gallery
375: Community Forums
376: Statistics
377: Community Forums
378: Member Screenshots
379: Community Forums
380: Community Forums
381: Home
382: Photo Gallery
383: Community Forums
384: Community Forums
385: Home
386: Photo Gallery
387: Community Forums
388: Photo Gallery
389: Home
390: Community Forums
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: Community Forums
394: Home
395: Photo Gallery
396: News Archive
397: News Archive
398: Community Forums
399: Community Forums
400: Community Forums
401: Community Forums
402: Photo Gallery
403: Community Forums
404: Home
405: News Archive
406: Community Forums
407: Photo Gallery
408: Community Forums
409: Community Forums
410: Community Forums
411: Community Forums
412: Home
413: Downloads
414: Community Forums
415: Community Forums
416: Member Screenshots
417: Community Forums
418: Community Forums
419: Community Forums
420: Community Forums
421: Community Forums
422: Community Forums
423: Member Screenshots
424: Photo Gallery
425: Home
426: Community Forums
427: Member Screenshots
428: News Archive
429: Photo Gallery
430: Home
431: Community Forums
432: Community Forums
433: Community Forums
434: Home
435: Community Forums
436: Community Forums
437: Your Account
438: Community Forums
439: Your Account
440: Community Forums
441: Photo Gallery
442: Home
443: Community Forums
444: News Archive
445: Home
446: Community Forums
447: Community Forums
448: Community Forums
449: News Archive
450: Home
451: Home
452: Community Forums
453: Community Forums
454: Community Forums
455: News Archive
456: Home
457: Downloads
458: Community Forums
459: News Archive
460: Community Forums
461: Community Forums
462: Community Forums
463: Home
464: Member Screenshots
465: Home
466: Community Forums
467: Community Forums
468: Community Forums
469: Photo Gallery
470: Photo Gallery
471: Home
472: Downloads
473: Home
474: Home
475: Community Forums
476: Home
477: Community Forums
478: Home
479: Community Forums
480: Member Screenshots
481: Photo Gallery
482: Photo Gallery
483: Photo Gallery
484: Home
485: Member Screenshots
486: Photo Gallery
487: News
488: Member Screenshots
489: Community Forums
490: Member Screenshots
491: Community Forums
492: Photo Gallery
493: Community Forums
494: Community Forums
495: Community Forums
496: Member Screenshots
497: Photo Gallery
498: Community Forums
499: Photo Gallery
500: Member Screenshots
501: Home
502: Community Forums
503: Community Forums
504: Member Screenshots
505: Member Screenshots
506: Community Forums
507: Community Forums
508: Community Forums
509: Community Forums
510: Photo Gallery
511: Home
512: Photo Gallery
513: Community Forums
514: Community Forums
515: Downloads
516: Statistics
517: Downloads
518: Community Forums
519: Photo Gallery
520: Member Screenshots
521: Community Forums
522: Community Forums
523: Home
524: Community Forums
525: Member Screenshots
526: Community Forums
527: Member Screenshots
528: Photo Gallery
529: Home
530: Member Screenshots
531: Home
532: Photo Gallery
533: Community Forums
534: Member Screenshots
535: Photo Gallery
536: Community Forums
537: Home
538: Member Screenshots
539: Home
540: Community Forums
541: Community Forums
542: Member Screenshots
543: LinkToUs
544: Community Forums
545: Community Forums
546: Downloads
547: Downloads
548: Downloads
549: Community Forums
550: Community Forums
551: Downloads
552: Member Screenshots
553: Community Forums
554: Home
555: Member Screenshots
556: Member Screenshots
557: Photo Gallery
558: Photo Gallery
559: Home
560: Community Forums
561: News Archive
562: Photo Gallery
563: Community Forums
564: Community Forums
565: Member Screenshots
566: Home
567: Downloads
568: Your Account
569: Photo Gallery
570: Community Forums
571: Community Forums
572: Home
573: Downloads
574: Home
575: Downloads
576: Home
577: Community Forums
578: Home
579: Home
580: Community Forums
581: Community Forums
582: Home
583: Photo Gallery
584: Community Forums
585: Community Forums
586: Community Forums
587: Downloads
588: Home
589: Downloads
590: Community Forums
591: Community Forums
592: Community Forums
593: Member Screenshots
594: Community Forums
595: Community Forums
596: Community Forums
597: Community Forums
598: Photo Gallery
599: Member Screenshots
600: Your Account
601: Community Forums
602: Home
603: Community Forums
604: Photo Gallery
605: News Archive
606: Community Forums
607: Community Forums
608: Community Forums
609: Community Forums
610: Photo Gallery
611: Downloads
612: Community Forums
613: Photo Gallery
614: Home
615: Statistics
616: Community Forums
617: Community Forums
618: Community Forums
619: Home
620: Home
621: Home
622: Member Screenshots
623: Community Forums
624: Community Forums
625: Home
626: Member Screenshots
627: Member Screenshots
628: Community Forums
629: Community Forums
630: Member Screenshots
631: Statistics
632: Member Screenshots
633: Home
634: Member Screenshots
635: Photo Gallery
636: Home
637: Community Forums
638: Community Forums
639: Community Forums
640: Community Forums
641: Home
642: Community Forums
643: Downloads
644: Member Screenshots
645: Community Forums
646: Community Forums
647: Photo Gallery
648: Home
649: Community Forums
650: Home
651: Community Forums
652: Home
653: Community Forums
654: Community Forums
655: Your Account
656: Community Forums
657: Community Forums
658: Community Forums
659: Community Forums
660: Downloads
661: Community Forums
662: Downloads
663: Home
664: Community Forums
665: Home
666: Community Forums
667: Community Forums
668: Community Forums
669: Community Forums
670: Home
671: Home
672: Statistics
673: Community Forums
674: Community Forums
675: Member Screenshots
676: Home
677: Member Screenshots
678: Home
679: News Archive
680: Your Account
681: Photo Gallery
682: Home
683: Community Forums
684: Home
685: Your Account
686: Community Forums
687: Community Forums
688: Community Forums
689: Home
690: Community Forums
691: Community Forums
692: Community Forums
693: Photo Gallery
694: Home
695: Photo Gallery
696: Community Forums
697: Community Forums
698: News Archive
699: Community Forums
700: Community Forums
701: Community Forums
702: Community Forums
703: Photo Gallery
704: Community Forums
705: Community Forums
706: Treasury
707: Member Screenshots
708: Member Screenshots
709: Community Forums
710: Community Forums
711: Home
712: Community Forums
713: Community Forums
714: Community Forums
715: Photo Gallery
716: Community Forums
717: Community Forums
718: Community Forums
719: Community Forums
720: Home
721: Home
722: News
723: Home
724: Community Forums
725: Community Forums
726: Home
727: Community Forums
728: Community Forums
729: Home
730: Community Forums
731: Member Screenshots
732: LinkToUs
733: Community Forums
734: Home
735: Photo Gallery
736: Photo Gallery
737: Photo Gallery
738: Member Screenshots
739: Photo Gallery
740: News Archive
741: Community Forums
742: Community Forums
743: Community Forums
744: Member Screenshots
745: Community Forums
746: Member Screenshots
747: Photo Gallery
748: Community Forums
749: Community Forums
750: Home
751: Community Forums
752: Photo Gallery
753: Community Forums
754: Photo Gallery
755: Photo Gallery
756: Home
757: Photo Gallery
758: Community Forums
759: Community Forums
760: Community Forums
761: Photo Gallery
762: Community Forums
763: Community Forums
764: Community Forums
765: Member Screenshots
766: Community Forums
767: Community Forums
768: News Archive
769: Community Forums
770: Member Screenshots
771: Community Forums
772: Community Forums
773: Community Forums
774: Community Forums
775: Community Forums
776: Community Forums
777: Photo Gallery
778: Member Screenshots
779: Home
780: Community Forums
781: Photo Gallery
782: Home
783: Member Screenshots
784: Statistics
785: Photo Gallery
786: Community Forums
787: News Archive
788: Community Forums
789: News Archive
790: Community Forums
791: Community Forums
792: Community Forums
793: Home
794: Community Forums
795: Home
796: Home
797: News Archive
798: Home
799: Photo Gallery
800: Community Forums
801: Home
802: Community Forums
803: Community Forums
804: Downloads
805: Community Forums
806: Community Forums
807: Home
808: Community Forums
809: Home
810: Community Forums
811: Community Forums
812: Community Forums
813: Community Forums
814: Community Forums
815: Home
816: Community Forums
817: Home
818: Community Forums
819: Community Forums
820: Community Forums
821: Home
822: Community Forums
823: Downloads
824: Community Forums
825: Home
826: News
827: Home
828: Community Forums
829: Downloads
830: Statistics
831: Photo Gallery
832: Home
833: Community Forums
834: News Archive
835: Community Forums
836: Home
837: Statistics
838: Community Forums
839: Community Forums
840: News Archive
841: Home
842: Community Forums
843: Home
844: Home
845: Community Forums
846: Community Forums
847: Community Forums
848: Community Forums
849: Community Forums
850: Community Forums
851: Home
852: Statistics
853: Community Forums
854: Community Forums
855: Community Forums
856: Community Forums
857: Home
858: Home
859: Community Forums
860: Photo Gallery
861: Home
862: Community Forums
863: Community Forums
864: News Archive
865: Downloads
866: Community Forums
867: Community Forums
868: Home
869: Home
870: Community Forums
871: Community Forums
872: Community Forums
873: Community Forums
874: Home
875: Home
876: News Archive
877: Community Forums
878: Home
879: Community Forums
880: Home
881: Photo Gallery
882: Home
883: Community Forums
884: Home
885: News Archive
886: Member Screenshots
887: Downloads
888: Community Forums
889: Home
890: Community Forums
891: Home
892: Community Forums
893: Community Forums
894: Home
895: Home
896: Community Forums
897: Community Forums
898: Community Forums
899: Community Forums
900: News Archive
901: Community Forums
902: Home
903: Home
904: Community Forums
905: Community Forums
906: Community Forums
907: Member Screenshots
908: Member Screenshots
909: Community Forums
910: Member Screenshots
911: Community Forums
912: Statistics
913: Community Forums
914: Photo Gallery
915: Community Forums
916: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Sherman Firefly
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:34 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Well there is an big difference in the upgrading of the various weapons used in the different countries between 1942 (Africa landings) and 1944 (D-day)

The Russians upgraded their weapons in the tanks or developed new ones to defeat the heavier German armour
The T34/85, ISU-152, ISU-122, IS-2, etc where all developed mainly in response to the German Tiger

The Germans mainly upgraded their weapons in the tanks or developed new ones to defeat the heavier Russian armour to expected to appear
They had already some nasty suprises in the past, with Russian armour

The British, they did not realy standarised
However they dropped the ones that became obselete, like the Valentine and the Crusader, and replaced it with others
The upgrading of the weapons was not an real succes, except for the 17pdr on the Sherman

The US army had the know-how and the capable weapons available to defeat German armour
The 3in or 76mm AA gun, on which the 76mm tank gun was based, was capable with the MV it had to defeat German armour
The breech was modified to fit inside an tank, that made sense
However the barrel was made shorter because it was sticking out to far Shocked
With reducing the barrel length, the profit of the high MV was lost

The upgrade of the suspension was only something on the side
It did not improve the performance of the gun

When you build in an WW2 76mm Sherman gun into an modern M1A1 Abrams you still can not defeat the armour of an German Tiger or Panther
The only benefit you will have is mobility and armour protection

Concerning priorities of the several services and theaters
The demands of the different services was in all nations, not an typical problem for the US

About the several theaters
True the US (and UK) also had the pacific to operate in and this was not so for Russia or Germany
However the Japanese tanks where not the problem to defeat, no matter if an 75mm or an 76mm was used

The 76mm was developed to defeat the German armour and it failed in doing so

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:05 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- Michel_Krauss

Concerning priorities of the several services and theaters
The demands of the different services was in all nations, not an typical problem for the US

Michel


Sorry to disillusion you, but this is just plain wrong.

I recommend you do some additional reading. Regarding this point above, you might want to start with "Marines Under Armor" by Kenneth W. Estes, COL. (ret.), in particular the relevant chapters concerning the campaign in the Pacific. There was enormous friction between the Army and the USMC regarding the allocation of the limited resource of equipment.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:51 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Doug,

sorry if you are disappointed, however it's true

When 2 (or more) different branches have to use, or want to use, the same equipment and have to co-operated with each other:
- they will disagree with each other about allmost everything

Mainly because they have different requirements for the equipment and there are different needs of the amount of equipment

That has been during WW2, has been before WW2 and still is today
And that is not an problem that is typical to the US, because of the marines and the army

Found the book on Google books, will read it
Perhaps I will learm something new Mr. Green

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 2:02 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Michel

As you stated only the U.S. and U.K had to deal with the requirements of a worldwide war. The need to defeat German armor was only part of the tasks that U.S. and U.K. tank designors had to worry about. The users in teh Pacific and Southern Asia saw no need to spend time developing heavier tanks with more powerful guns. If anything they wanted development time spent on ways to transfer tanks from ships to beaches, fight in jungles and cross wide, deep rivers.

On top of that the U.S. was commited to supplying vehicles to many of the allies, some of whom had requirements that differed from the U.S. Army. And it did matter if a 75mm or a 76mm was used. When working in the tight confines of Pacific jungle a long barreled 76mm was not acceptable. Having a short barreled gun that wouldn't get hung up on nearby trees demanded a short barrel weapon.

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 4:42 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- Michel_Krauss
Doug,

sorry if you are disappointed, however it's true

When 2 (or more) different branches have to use, or want to use, the same equipment and have to co-operated with each other:
- they will disagree with each other about allmost everything

Mainly because they have different requirements for the equipment and there are different needs of the amount of equipment

That has been during WW2, has been before WW2 and still is today
And that is not an problem that is typical to the US, because of the marines and the army

Found the book on Google books, will read it
Perhaps I will learm something new Mr. Green

Michel


Actually, it was precisely typical (and very much so) in it's application to different priorities to the USMC and the Army...from no less a source than Gen. George C. Marshall, the U.S. Army Chief of Staff, who openly wondered (and I paraphrase) if any of the necessary warfighting equipment that was considered necessary to the Army prosecuting the war would even be available, after he had finished supplying the USMC (as they were clearly in the fight in the PTO first and had most immediate needs for that equipment). When the Army CoS wonders if the material he needs will be available to him, you have to accept that this is a problem typical of the U.S. Armed Forces from the outset of the war. Everybody was jockying for weapons systems, means of production, aircraft engines, etc. for the perceived needs of all the services...all the time while trying to meet the needs of our lend-lease partners while trying to keep them afloat. U.S. production means were substantial, but not limitless, and this problem was not solved before the end of the war.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
bialy-r
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 06, 2009
Posts: 1233
Location: POLAND
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 8:37 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Sherman Hybrid Ic – Monument for the fallen of the 3rd Airborne Artillery Regiment in the 1982 war, Cordoba (Argentina)

carrosdecomb.blogspot....alera.html
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 7:48 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- bialy-r
Sherman Hybrid Ic – Monument for the fallen of the 3rd Airborne Artillery Regiment in the 1982 war, Cordoba (Argentina)

carrosdecomb.blogspot....alera.html


very well spotted, Rafal !!

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 7:20 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

The problem with poor HE ammunition for the 17-pdr and the 76mm could easily have been solved by developing an HE round with thinner walls, fired at a lower velocity. The Germans did this from day one with the 7,5cm KwK 40 L/43 (later L/48) and that round contained about the same amount of explosive as the Us 75mm HE round. Possibly, a slight modification of the existing 75mm HE might have sufficed.

The British actually developed first a low velocity version of the original 17 pdr HE round and later - possibly post war - developed two different High Capacity rounds with more HE filler than the orginal.

So developing a good 17 pdr or 76mm HE round can hardly have been a significant technical problem, so the reason those two guns did not have a good HE round in WWII must be found elsewhere.
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 3:02 am
Post subject: Re: WIP wait to look at.

Hi Folks!

Sorry I am so late to join in.

Maybe these photos might help some.

Below is a 1942 issued M2 treadway floating bridge. This bridge was designed to carry the M2 medium tank during the mid 1930s. The M3 Lee and the early M4s pushed the limits of this system. Note how close the outside edges of the M4 is to the edges of the treadways.
Note how the water level is over the top of the pontoons and parts of the saddles are in the water. This was the equipment the Chief of Engineers was concerned about. This was the system his engineers had to work with. Priority for steel for larger saddles and rubber for larger pontoons was low on the totom pole for the engineers.



This is the heavy M2 treadway with larger saddles and pontoons that large quanties only started reaching the ETO in late 1944. The heavier and longer saddles and larger pontoons also required larger and heavier trucks to transport this equipment. All needing room on the available shipping. The treadways have been moved outward, but not by that much. Still a tight fit for the M4E8's.



Below is the problem the Chief of Engineers had with sending the T-26 to the ETO. That bridge has been modified so the tracks would not damage the equipment along the outer edges of the deck. Anyone who has ever driven a tracked vehicle will understand this is just asking for trouble.


Four comments about the 76 gun tanks.
1. On June 6, 1944, there was a large number of 76mm tanks in storage in England. Not one single tank battalion commader wanted to replace his 75 gun tanks with the 76 prior to D-Day. The excuss given later was there wasn't time to retrain on those tanks. After the US Army started running into a larger numbers of Panther tanks than Army level intell expected did those same commanders started asking for those 76 guns tanks setting back in England. By now the fighting is all out in France and those battalion commanders who could not find the time in England found the time to retrain in France after the landings.

2. The proof testing of the 76mm AT ammo was flawed. Ike was told as late as June that the 76 AT ammo would go through the front hull of a Panther tank. It was only after the troops started using it that it was learned it could not do the job per the claims of the ordinance corps.

3. The 76mm HE round. Major case of could have, should have. Facts are the tankers did NOT like the one that was available, therefore, they didn't like the 76. They were not thinking about killing German tanks with their tanks. See comment below on doctrine.

4. Between the breakout and the start of the Battle of the Bulge. General Abrams who is one of the best known US tank battalion commanders in the ETO. His tank, Thunderbolt 6 was a 75mm M4. As a battalion commander he could pick the type of M4 he wanted. His Commanding Officer had to order him to use a 76mm M4 (Thunderbolt 7 a VVSS). My point here is that there was a MAJOR lack of end users asking for better tank guns. See comment below on doctrine.

If you look at the T-26 program, only the final version of the program was equiped with a 90 mm. All the others still had the same 76 the Sheman had. Before the Air Forces gained air superiorty on the battelfield, priorty of 90mm gun barrels went to air defense for the M-1 and M-2 90mm AAA weapon systems.

A study of the deployment of the first 40 T-26s (untested and not approved for issue) to the ETO shows that was the best that could have been done after the problem had been learned the hard way in June of 1944.


A study of the M6 heavy tank will also show the lack of interest in heavier tanks prior to the battles of June 44 in France.

Doctrine, championed by Gen McNair, Commanding Gereral of Army Ground Forces (he answered only to Gen. Marshall), had a MAJOR impact on limiting the upgrading of tanks. As late as D-Day he was still in favor of TOWED anti-tanks guns to deal with German tanks. He reportly said "Give tankers bigger guns and they will go tank hunting". A volition of HIS Tank Destoryers ONLY fight enemy tanks. This doctrine which was drilled into all tankers and tank unit commanders during the war. It was only after the war and the results of lessons learned that the highest levels of the US Army accepted the fact this doctrine was wrong. That acceptance resulted it the disbandment of the Tank Destroyer Command and all that equipment declared obsolete and surplus. This doctrine WAS the NUMBER ONE problem that delayed more fire power and better protection from reaching the field. All the other excuses could have been over come if the WILL was there. The WILL was just NOT THERE in the right places.

There are MANY details that caused the Sherman to be the tank the US fielded. In the end, in the hands of fast learning US and UK tankers, the Sherman was the best tank on the western side of the ETO. I understand that Soviet tankers who had M4A2/76s learned to use they very well also. The history of the Sherman is a major example of a path once chosen, is very hard to change once travel on it has started.

All of this from one who a long time ago and before hanging out here also felt that the Sherman was the worst tank ever.

In the end, the Sherman and the T-34 won WWII with help for all the other AFVs that where fielded, not the Panther and not the Tigers.

Sgt, Scouts out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 4:48 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Good to hear from you, Roy!

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 11:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Hi Doug!

Good to hear from you, Love this thread. Reminds me of the way AFV News was a long time ago. We were learning a lot back then.

Sgt, Scouts out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bialy-r
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 06, 2009
Posts: 1233
Location: POLAND
PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2013 8:05 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Sherman Hybrid Ic ?

in Cordoba (Argentina)

www.network54.com/Foru...+Sherman--
Back to top
View user's profile
piney
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 2330
Location: Republic of Southern New Jersey
PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2013 11:04 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Boy, hadn't noticed this thread, much more like the old days, dueling pistols at twenty paces. OK time for me to get into the line of fire.

A lot of changes had to made to the Sherman to use the 17 pounder
"
It was W.G.K. Kilbourn, a Vickers engineer at the time working for the Department of Tank Design, who transformed the prototype into the tank that would serve the British forces from D-day onwards. The first thing Kilbourn had to fix was the lack of a workable recoil system for the 17-pounder. The 17-pounder travelled 40 in (1.0 m) back as it absorbed the recoil of the blast. This was too long for the Sherman turret. Kilbourn solved this problem by redesigning the recoil system completely rather than modifying it. The recoil cylinders were shortened to allow the turret to take the gun and its recoil, and the new cylinders were placed on both sides of the gun to take advantage of the width of the Sherman's turret rather than be hindered by its height.

The gun breech itself was also rotated 90 degrees to allow for loading from the left rather than from on top. The radio which was mounted in the back of the turret in British tanks had to be moved. An armoured box (a "bustle") was attached to the back of the turret to house the radio. Access was through a large hole cut through the back of the turret.

The next problem encountered by Kilbourn was that the gun cradle, the metal block the gun sits on, had to be shortened to allow the gun to fit into the Firefly, and thus the gun itself was not very stable. Kilbourn had a new barrel designed for the 17-pounder that had a longer untapered section at the base, which helped solve the stability problem. A new mantlet was designed to house the new gun and accept the modified cradle. The modifications were extensive enough to require that 17-pounders intended for the Firefly had to be factory built specifically for it.

Kilbourn had to deal with other problems. On the standard Sherman tank, there was a single hatch in the turret through which the tank commander, gunner and loader entered and left the tank. However the 17-pounder's larger breech and recoil system significantly reduced the ability of the loader to quickly exit from the tank if it was hit. As a result, a new hatch was cut into the top of the turret over the gunner's position. The final major change was the elimination of the hull gunner in favour of space for more 17-pounder ammunition, which was significantly longer than the 75 mm shell and thus took up more room.
"

so it's not just a drop in the new gun and go, and you lose the hull MG that could be vital fighting infantry.

Regarding The Tiger's and Panther's. They were not mechanically reliable enough to meet US standards. Something like 40 % were lost due to breakdown. What good is a superior gun if you can't get it to the fight?

I think the policy of having a less powerful gun, but having it always available makes more sense then not having a gun 40% of the time.
OK open fire

_________________
The only good skwerril is a dead un
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bialy-r
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 06, 2009
Posts: 1233
Location: POLAND
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 7:39 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- bialy-r
Sherman Hybrid Ic ?

in Cordoba (Argentina)

www.network54.com/Foru...+Sherman--


Any help ? is that/was a Firefly ?
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:31 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- bialy-r
Sherman Hybrid Ic ?

in Cordoba (Argentina)

www.network54.com/Foru...+Sherman--


Sherman Ic hull with a normal 75mm turret (doesn't have the British loader's hatch beside the commander's cupola).

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 4 of 5
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum