±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 701
Total: 701
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Photo Gallery
03: Home
04: Member Screenshots
05: Community Forums
06: Search
07: Tell a Friend
08: Community Forums
09: Home
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Photo Gallery
16: Photo Gallery
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Member Screenshots
20: Member Screenshots
21: Home
22: Downloads
23: Photo Gallery
24: Community Forums
25: Home
26: Community Forums
27: Home
28: Community Forums
29: Member Screenshots
30: Photo Gallery
31: Downloads
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: Community Forums
39: Downloads
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Downloads
44: Community Forums
45: Contact
46: Home
47: Member Screenshots
48: News Archive
49: Member Screenshots
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Member Screenshots
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Home
60: Member Screenshots
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: News Archive
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Member Screenshots
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Member Screenshots
73: Community Forums
74: Member Screenshots
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Downloads
89: Member Screenshots
90: Community Forums
91: Member Screenshots
92: Home
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Photo Gallery
96: News Archive
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Community Forums
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: Photo Gallery
103: Photo Gallery
104: Community Forums
105: News Archive
106: Member Screenshots
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Community Forums
115: Photo Gallery
116: Home
117: Contact
118: Community Forums
119: Downloads
120: Downloads
121: Photo Gallery
122: Downloads
123: Contact
124: Community Forums
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: Community Forums
129: Home
130: Community Forums
131: Photo Gallery
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Member Screenshots
135: Member Screenshots
136: Home
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Home
140: Photo Gallery
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Member Screenshots
144: Community Forums
145: Member Screenshots
146: Community Forums
147: News Archive
148: Member Screenshots
149: Member Screenshots
150: Community Forums
151: Photo Gallery
152: Community Forums
153: Member Screenshots
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Home
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Member Screenshots
162: Home
163: Statistics
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Home
168: Home
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Photo Gallery
172: Downloads
173: Home
174: Community Forums
175: Downloads
176: Home
177: Home
178: Community Forums
179: Home
180: Community Forums
181: LinkToUs
182: Photo Gallery
183: Community Forums
184: LinkToUs
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Home
188: Community Forums
189: Home
190: Downloads
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Member Screenshots
194: Community Forums
195: Downloads
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Photo Gallery
204: News Archive
205: Home
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Home
209: Community Forums
210: Member Screenshots
211: Treasury
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Home
215: Member Screenshots
216: Community Forums
217: Photo Gallery
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: News
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: News Archive
224: Home
225: Community Forums
226: News Archive
227: Home
228: Member Screenshots
229: Member Screenshots
230: Member Screenshots
231: Downloads
232: Member Screenshots
233: Member Screenshots
234: Community Forums
235: Member Screenshots
236: Contact
237: Photo Gallery
238: News Archive
239: Community Forums
240: News Archive
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: News Archive
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: Community Forums
247: Statistics
248: Member Screenshots
249: LinkToUs
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Photo Gallery
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: Community Forums
256: Member Screenshots
257: Photo Gallery
258: Downloads
259: News Archive
260: Home
261: News Archive
262: Photo Gallery
263: Community Forums
264: Member Screenshots
265: Statistics
266: Community Forums
267: Home
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Downloads
271: Home
272: Community Forums
273: Home
274: Member Screenshots
275: Member Screenshots
276: News Archive
277: Home
278: News Archive
279: Community Forums
280: Member Screenshots
281: Downloads
282: Home
283: Photo Gallery
284: Photo Gallery
285: Home
286: Home
287: Member Screenshots
288: Community Forums
289: News Archive
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Community Forums
293: Community Forums
294: Member Screenshots
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: News Archive
299: Home
300: Member Screenshots
301: Downloads
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Member Screenshots
306: Photo Gallery
307: Community Forums
308: Member Screenshots
309: Community Forums
310: Member Screenshots
311: Photo Gallery
312: Community Forums
313: Community Forums
314: Home
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: Downloads
320: Photo Gallery
321: Photo Gallery
322: Community Forums
323: News Archive
324: Community Forums
325: Home
326: Home
327: Home
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: Community Forums
331: Home
332: Community Forums
333: Your Account
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: Member Screenshots
337: News
338: Community Forums
339: Community Forums
340: Community Forums
341: Community Forums
342: Community Forums
343: Photo Gallery
344: Community Forums
345: Community Forums
346: Member Screenshots
347: Community Forums
348: Community Forums
349: Community Forums
350: Photo Gallery
351: Photo Gallery
352: Home
353: Member Screenshots
354: Community Forums
355: Home
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Community Forums
359: Photo Gallery
360: Community Forums
361: Home
362: Community Forums
363: Community Forums
364: Community Forums
365: Home
366: Photo Gallery
367: Home
368: Home
369: Home
370: Community Forums
371: Community Forums
372: Member Screenshots
373: Photo Gallery
374: Member Screenshots
375: Community Forums
376: Member Screenshots
377: News Archive
378: Member Screenshots
379: Your Account
380: Member Screenshots
381: Member Screenshots
382: Member Screenshots
383: News Archive
384: Member Screenshots
385: Statistics
386: Photo Gallery
387: Photo Gallery
388: Photo Gallery
389: Community Forums
390: Community Forums
391: Community Forums
392: News Archive
393: Downloads
394: Community Forums
395: Community Forums
396: Member Screenshots
397: Community Forums
398: Community Forums
399: News Archive
400: Community Forums
401: Home
402: Community Forums
403: News Archive
404: Community Forums
405: Community Forums
406: Photo Gallery
407: Member Screenshots
408: Home
409: Community Forums
410: Member Screenshots
411: Community Forums
412: Community Forums
413: News Archive
414: Community Forums
415: Member Screenshots
416: Community Forums
417: Home
418: Community Forums
419: Community Forums
420: Downloads
421: Photo Gallery
422: Home
423: Community Forums
424: Community Forums
425: Community Forums
426: Home
427: Member Screenshots
428: Community Forums
429: Member Screenshots
430: Photo Gallery
431: Community Forums
432: Community Forums
433: Community Forums
434: News Archive
435: Community Forums
436: Member Screenshots
437: Home
438: Community Forums
439: Community Forums
440: News Archive
441: Home
442: Community Forums
443: Community Forums
444: News Archive
445: Community Forums
446: Community Forums
447: News Archive
448: Home
449: Photo Gallery
450: Community Forums
451: Community Forums
452: Community Forums
453: Community Forums
454: Photo Gallery
455: Member Screenshots
456: Photo Gallery
457: Community Forums
458: Home
459: Community Forums
460: Photo Gallery
461: Member Screenshots
462: Member Screenshots
463: Community Forums
464: Community Forums
465: Community Forums
466: News
467: Community Forums
468: Community Forums
469: Member Screenshots
470: Community Forums
471: Community Forums
472: News Archive
473: News Archive
474: Community Forums
475: Community Forums
476: Member Screenshots
477: Community Forums
478: Member Screenshots
479: News
480: Photo Gallery
481: Member Screenshots
482: Community Forums
483: Downloads
484: Community Forums
485: Community Forums
486: Community Forums
487: News Archive
488: Community Forums
489: News Archive
490: Downloads
491: Community Forums
492: Community Forums
493: Community Forums
494: Member Screenshots
495: Community Forums
496: Community Forums
497: Community Forums
498: Community Forums
499: Member Screenshots
500: Community Forums
501: Home
502: Home
503: Community Forums
504: Home
505: Member Screenshots
506: News Archive
507: News Archive
508: Community Forums
509: Member Screenshots
510: Member Screenshots
511: Community Forums
512: Member Screenshots
513: Community Forums
514: Community Forums
515: Community Forums
516: Member Screenshots
517: Community Forums
518: Community Forums
519: Downloads
520: Downloads
521: Member Screenshots
522: Community Forums
523: Community Forums
524: Member Screenshots
525: Community Forums
526: Community Forums
527: Community Forums
528: Member Screenshots
529: Community Forums
530: Photo Gallery
531: Home
532: Home
533: Home
534: Community Forums
535: Community Forums
536: Photo Gallery
537: Home
538: Community Forums
539: Community Forums
540: Member Screenshots
541: Community Forums
542: Community Forums
543: Member Screenshots
544: Community Forums
545: Community Forums
546: Community Forums
547: Photo Gallery
548: Member Screenshots
549: Community Forums
550: Member Screenshots
551: Community Forums
552: Community Forums
553: Community Forums
554: Community Forums
555: Community Forums
556: Community Forums
557: Home
558: Community Forums
559: Community Forums
560: Photo Gallery
561: Community Forums
562: Photo Gallery
563: Home
564: Community Forums
565: Community Forums
566: Community Forums
567: Home
568: Community Forums
569: Member Screenshots
570: Home
571: Community Forums
572: Community Forums
573: Community Forums
574: Your Account
575: Home
576: Community Forums
577: Community Forums
578: Community Forums
579: Home
580: News Archive
581: Home
582: Community Forums
583: Photo Gallery
584: Home
585: News Archive
586: Statistics
587: Community Forums
588: Member Screenshots
589: Community Forums
590: Home
591: Community Forums
592: Member Screenshots
593: Community Forums
594: Member Screenshots
595: Community Forums
596: Photo Gallery
597: Member Screenshots
598: Community Forums
599: Community Forums
600: News Archive
601: Photo Gallery
602: Member Screenshots
603: Community Forums
604: Home
605: Community Forums
606: Community Forums
607: Home
608: Community Forums
609: Home
610: Photo Gallery
611: Home
612: News Archive
613: Community Forums
614: Community Forums
615: News
616: Member Screenshots
617: Downloads
618: Member Screenshots
619: Community Forums
620: Community Forums
621: Photo Gallery
622: Photo Gallery
623: Community Forums
624: Community Forums
625: Community Forums
626: Home
627: Community Forums
628: Home
629: Member Screenshots
630: News
631: Home
632: Community Forums
633: Member Screenshots
634: Home
635: Community Forums
636: Photo Gallery
637: Photo Gallery
638: Photo Gallery
639: Your Account
640: Home
641: Your Account
642: Home
643: Photo Gallery
644: Community Forums
645: Photo Gallery
646: Member Screenshots
647: Photo Gallery
648: Community Forums
649: Community Forums
650: Community Forums
651: News Archive
652: Community Forums
653: Community Forums
654: Community Forums
655: Community Forums
656: Photo Gallery
657: Photo Gallery
658: Community Forums
659: News Archive
660: Community Forums
661: Community Forums
662: Community Forums
663: Community Forums
664: Community Forums
665: Community Forums
666: Community Forums
667: Member Screenshots
668: News
669: Home
670: Community Forums
671: Community Forums
672: Member Screenshots
673: Community Forums
674: Home
675: Community Forums
676: Home
677: Community Forums
678: Photo Gallery
679: Home
680: News Archive
681: Tell a Friend
682: Community Forums
683: Community Forums
684: Downloads
685: Photo Gallery
686: Community Forums
687: Photo Gallery
688: Supporters
689: Community Forums
690: Community Forums
691: News Archive
692: Community Forums
693: Home
694: Community Forums
695: Photo Gallery
696: Community Forums
697: Community Forums
698: Member Screenshots
699: Member Screenshots
700: Photo Gallery
701: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Sherman Firefly
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:34 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Well there is an big difference in the upgrading of the various weapons used in the different countries between 1942 (Africa landings) and 1944 (D-day)

The Russians upgraded their weapons in the tanks or developed new ones to defeat the heavier German armour
The T34/85, ISU-152, ISU-122, IS-2, etc where all developed mainly in response to the German Tiger

The Germans mainly upgraded their weapons in the tanks or developed new ones to defeat the heavier Russian armour to expected to appear
They had already some nasty suprises in the past, with Russian armour

The British, they did not realy standarised
However they dropped the ones that became obselete, like the Valentine and the Crusader, and replaced it with others
The upgrading of the weapons was not an real succes, except for the 17pdr on the Sherman

The US army had the know-how and the capable weapons available to defeat German armour
The 3in or 76mm AA gun, on which the 76mm tank gun was based, was capable with the MV it had to defeat German armour
The breech was modified to fit inside an tank, that made sense
However the barrel was made shorter because it was sticking out to far Shocked
With reducing the barrel length, the profit of the high MV was lost

The upgrade of the suspension was only something on the side
It did not improve the performance of the gun

When you build in an WW2 76mm Sherman gun into an modern M1A1 Abrams you still can not defeat the armour of an German Tiger or Panther
The only benefit you will have is mobility and armour protection

Concerning priorities of the several services and theaters
The demands of the different services was in all nations, not an typical problem for the US

About the several theaters
True the US (and UK) also had the pacific to operate in and this was not so for Russia or Germany
However the Japanese tanks where not the problem to defeat, no matter if an 75mm or an 76mm was used

The 76mm was developed to defeat the German armour and it failed in doing so

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:05 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- Michel_Krauss

Concerning priorities of the several services and theaters
The demands of the different services was in all nations, not an typical problem for the US

Michel


Sorry to disillusion you, but this is just plain wrong.

I recommend you do some additional reading. Regarding this point above, you might want to start with "Marines Under Armor" by Kenneth W. Estes, COL. (ret.), in particular the relevant chapters concerning the campaign in the Pacific. There was enormous friction between the Army and the USMC regarding the allocation of the limited resource of equipment.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Michel_Krauss
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Posts: 953
Location: Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:51 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Doug,

sorry if you are disappointed, however it's true

When 2 (or more) different branches have to use, or want to use, the same equipment and have to co-operated with each other:
- they will disagree with each other about allmost everything

Mainly because they have different requirements for the equipment and there are different needs of the amount of equipment

That has been during WW2, has been before WW2 and still is today
And that is not an problem that is typical to the US, because of the marines and the army

Found the book on Google books, will read it
Perhaps I will learm something new Mr. Green

Michel

_________________
I'm Not Crazy, I'm Just Not You
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 2:02 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Michel

As you stated only the U.S. and U.K had to deal with the requirements of a worldwide war. The need to defeat German armor was only part of the tasks that U.S. and U.K. tank designors had to worry about. The users in teh Pacific and Southern Asia saw no need to spend time developing heavier tanks with more powerful guns. If anything they wanted development time spent on ways to transfer tanks from ships to beaches, fight in jungles and cross wide, deep rivers.

On top of that the U.S. was commited to supplying vehicles to many of the allies, some of whom had requirements that differed from the U.S. Army. And it did matter if a 75mm or a 76mm was used. When working in the tight confines of Pacific jungle a long barreled 76mm was not acceptable. Having a short barreled gun that wouldn't get hung up on nearby trees demanded a short barrel weapon.

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 4:42 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- Michel_Krauss
Doug,

sorry if you are disappointed, however it's true

When 2 (or more) different branches have to use, or want to use, the same equipment and have to co-operated with each other:
- they will disagree with each other about allmost everything

Mainly because they have different requirements for the equipment and there are different needs of the amount of equipment

That has been during WW2, has been before WW2 and still is today
And that is not an problem that is typical to the US, because of the marines and the army

Found the book on Google books, will read it
Perhaps I will learm something new Mr. Green

Michel


Actually, it was precisely typical (and very much so) in it's application to different priorities to the USMC and the Army...from no less a source than Gen. George C. Marshall, the U.S. Army Chief of Staff, who openly wondered (and I paraphrase) if any of the necessary warfighting equipment that was considered necessary to the Army prosecuting the war would even be available, after he had finished supplying the USMC (as they were clearly in the fight in the PTO first and had most immediate needs for that equipment). When the Army CoS wonders if the material he needs will be available to him, you have to accept that this is a problem typical of the U.S. Armed Forces from the outset of the war. Everybody was jockying for weapons systems, means of production, aircraft engines, etc. for the perceived needs of all the services...all the time while trying to meet the needs of our lend-lease partners while trying to keep them afloat. U.S. production means were substantial, but not limitless, and this problem was not solved before the end of the war.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
bialy-r
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 06, 2009
Posts: 1233
Location: POLAND
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 8:37 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Sherman Hybrid Ic – Monument for the fallen of the 3rd Airborne Artillery Regiment in the 1982 war, Cordoba (Argentina)

carrosdecomb.blogspot....alera.html
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 7:48 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- bialy-r
Sherman Hybrid Ic – Monument for the fallen of the 3rd Airborne Artillery Regiment in the 1982 war, Cordoba (Argentina)

carrosdecomb.blogspot....alera.html


very well spotted, Rafal !!

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 7:20 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

The problem with poor HE ammunition for the 17-pdr and the 76mm could easily have been solved by developing an HE round with thinner walls, fired at a lower velocity. The Germans did this from day one with the 7,5cm KwK 40 L/43 (later L/48) and that round contained about the same amount of explosive as the Us 75mm HE round. Possibly, a slight modification of the existing 75mm HE might have sufficed.

The British actually developed first a low velocity version of the original 17 pdr HE round and later - possibly post war - developed two different High Capacity rounds with more HE filler than the orginal.

So developing a good 17 pdr or 76mm HE round can hardly have been a significant technical problem, so the reason those two guns did not have a good HE round in WWII must be found elsewhere.
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 3:02 am
Post subject: Re: WIP wait to look at.

Hi Folks!

Sorry I am so late to join in.

Maybe these photos might help some.

Below is a 1942 issued M2 treadway floating bridge. This bridge was designed to carry the M2 medium tank during the mid 1930s. The M3 Lee and the early M4s pushed the limits of this system. Note how close the outside edges of the M4 is to the edges of the treadways.
Note how the water level is over the top of the pontoons and parts of the saddles are in the water. This was the equipment the Chief of Engineers was concerned about. This was the system his engineers had to work with. Priority for steel for larger saddles and rubber for larger pontoons was low on the totom pole for the engineers.



This is the heavy M2 treadway with larger saddles and pontoons that large quanties only started reaching the ETO in late 1944. The heavier and longer saddles and larger pontoons also required larger and heavier trucks to transport this equipment. All needing room on the available shipping. The treadways have been moved outward, but not by that much. Still a tight fit for the M4E8's.



Below is the problem the Chief of Engineers had with sending the T-26 to the ETO. That bridge has been modified so the tracks would not damage the equipment along the outer edges of the deck. Anyone who has ever driven a tracked vehicle will understand this is just asking for trouble.


Four comments about the 76 gun tanks.
1. On June 6, 1944, there was a large number of 76mm tanks in storage in England. Not one single tank battalion commader wanted to replace his 75 gun tanks with the 76 prior to D-Day. The excuss given later was there wasn't time to retrain on those tanks. After the US Army started running into a larger numbers of Panther tanks than Army level intell expected did those same commanders started asking for those 76 guns tanks setting back in England. By now the fighting is all out in France and those battalion commanders who could not find the time in England found the time to retrain in France after the landings.

2. The proof testing of the 76mm AT ammo was flawed. Ike was told as late as June that the 76 AT ammo would go through the front hull of a Panther tank. It was only after the troops started using it that it was learned it could not do the job per the claims of the ordinance corps.

3. The 76mm HE round. Major case of could have, should have. Facts are the tankers did NOT like the one that was available, therefore, they didn't like the 76. They were not thinking about killing German tanks with their tanks. See comment below on doctrine.

4. Between the breakout and the start of the Battle of the Bulge. General Abrams who is one of the best known US tank battalion commanders in the ETO. His tank, Thunderbolt 6 was a 75mm M4. As a battalion commander he could pick the type of M4 he wanted. His Commanding Officer had to order him to use a 76mm M4 (Thunderbolt 7 a VVSS). My point here is that there was a MAJOR lack of end users asking for better tank guns. See comment below on doctrine.

If you look at the T-26 program, only the final version of the program was equiped with a 90 mm. All the others still had the same 76 the Sheman had. Before the Air Forces gained air superiorty on the battelfield, priorty of 90mm gun barrels went to air defense for the M-1 and M-2 90mm AAA weapon systems.

A study of the deployment of the first 40 T-26s (untested and not approved for issue) to the ETO shows that was the best that could have been done after the problem had been learned the hard way in June of 1944.


A study of the M6 heavy tank will also show the lack of interest in heavier tanks prior to the battles of June 44 in France.

Doctrine, championed by Gen McNair, Commanding Gereral of Army Ground Forces (he answered only to Gen. Marshall), had a MAJOR impact on limiting the upgrading of tanks. As late as D-Day he was still in favor of TOWED anti-tanks guns to deal with German tanks. He reportly said "Give tankers bigger guns and they will go tank hunting". A volition of HIS Tank Destoryers ONLY fight enemy tanks. This doctrine which was drilled into all tankers and tank unit commanders during the war. It was only after the war and the results of lessons learned that the highest levels of the US Army accepted the fact this doctrine was wrong. That acceptance resulted it the disbandment of the Tank Destroyer Command and all that equipment declared obsolete and surplus. This doctrine WAS the NUMBER ONE problem that delayed more fire power and better protection from reaching the field. All the other excuses could have been over come if the WILL was there. The WILL was just NOT THERE in the right places.

There are MANY details that caused the Sherman to be the tank the US fielded. In the end, in the hands of fast learning US and UK tankers, the Sherman was the best tank on the western side of the ETO. I understand that Soviet tankers who had M4A2/76s learned to use they very well also. The history of the Sherman is a major example of a path once chosen, is very hard to change once travel on it has started.

All of this from one who a long time ago and before hanging out here also felt that the Sherman was the worst tank ever.

In the end, the Sherman and the T-34 won WWII with help for all the other AFVs that where fielded, not the Panther and not the Tigers.

Sgt, Scouts out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 4:48 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Good to hear from you, Roy!

Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 11:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Hi Doug!

Good to hear from you, Love this thread. Reminds me of the way AFV News was a long time ago. We were learning a lot back then.

Sgt, Scouts out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bialy-r
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 06, 2009
Posts: 1233
Location: POLAND
PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2013 8:05 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Sherman Hybrid Ic ?

in Cordoba (Argentina)

www.network54.com/Foru...+Sherman--
Back to top
View user's profile
piney
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 2330
Location: Republic of Southern New Jersey
PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2013 11:04 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

Boy, hadn't noticed this thread, much more like the old days, dueling pistols at twenty paces. OK time for me to get into the line of fire.

A lot of changes had to made to the Sherman to use the 17 pounder
"
It was W.G.K. Kilbourn, a Vickers engineer at the time working for the Department of Tank Design, who transformed the prototype into the tank that would serve the British forces from D-day onwards. The first thing Kilbourn had to fix was the lack of a workable recoil system for the 17-pounder. The 17-pounder travelled 40 in (1.0 m) back as it absorbed the recoil of the blast. This was too long for the Sherman turret. Kilbourn solved this problem by redesigning the recoil system completely rather than modifying it. The recoil cylinders were shortened to allow the turret to take the gun and its recoil, and the new cylinders were placed on both sides of the gun to take advantage of the width of the Sherman's turret rather than be hindered by its height.

The gun breech itself was also rotated 90 degrees to allow for loading from the left rather than from on top. The radio which was mounted in the back of the turret in British tanks had to be moved. An armoured box (a "bustle") was attached to the back of the turret to house the radio. Access was through a large hole cut through the back of the turret.

The next problem encountered by Kilbourn was that the gun cradle, the metal block the gun sits on, had to be shortened to allow the gun to fit into the Firefly, and thus the gun itself was not very stable. Kilbourn had a new barrel designed for the 17-pounder that had a longer untapered section at the base, which helped solve the stability problem. A new mantlet was designed to house the new gun and accept the modified cradle. The modifications were extensive enough to require that 17-pounders intended for the Firefly had to be factory built specifically for it.

Kilbourn had to deal with other problems. On the standard Sherman tank, there was a single hatch in the turret through which the tank commander, gunner and loader entered and left the tank. However the 17-pounder's larger breech and recoil system significantly reduced the ability of the loader to quickly exit from the tank if it was hit. As a result, a new hatch was cut into the top of the turret over the gunner's position. The final major change was the elimination of the hull gunner in favour of space for more 17-pounder ammunition, which was significantly longer than the 75 mm shell and thus took up more room.
"

so it's not just a drop in the new gun and go, and you lose the hull MG that could be vital fighting infantry.

Regarding The Tiger's and Panther's. They were not mechanically reliable enough to meet US standards. Something like 40 % were lost due to breakdown. What good is a superior gun if you can't get it to the fight?

I think the policy of having a less powerful gun, but having it always available makes more sense then not having a gun 40% of the time.
OK open fire

_________________
The only good skwerril is a dead un
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bialy-r
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 06, 2009
Posts: 1233
Location: POLAND
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 7:39 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- bialy-r
Sherman Hybrid Ic ?

in Cordoba (Argentina)

www.network54.com/Foru...+Sherman--


Any help ? is that/was a Firefly ?
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:31 am
Post subject: Re: Sherman Firefly

- bialy-r
Sherman Hybrid Ic ?

in Cordoba (Argentina)

www.network54.com/Foru...+Sherman--


Sherman Ic hull with a normal 75mm turret (doesn't have the British loader's hatch beside the commander's cupola).

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 4 of 5
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum