±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 324
Total: 324
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Photo Gallery
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: Home
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: Downloads
10: Community Forums
11: Home
12: Home
13: Member Screenshots
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Member Screenshots
17: Photo Gallery
18: Community Forums
19: Photo Gallery
20: Home
21: Home
22: Home
23: Photo Gallery
24: Community Forums
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Photo Gallery
29: Home
30: Home
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Home
34: Community Forums
35: Home
36: Member Screenshots
37: Community Forums
38: Member Screenshots
39: Home
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Photo Gallery
44: Community Forums
45: Home
46: Community Forums
47: Downloads
48: Home
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Home
52: Home
53: Home
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Member Screenshots
58: Home
59: Home
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Home
65: Community Forums
66: Community Forums
67: Photo Gallery
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Photo Gallery
73: Community Forums
74: Member Screenshots
75: Community Forums
76: Photo Gallery
77: Community Forums
78: Home
79: Downloads
80: News
81: Member Screenshots
82: Home
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Home
86: Photo Gallery
87: Downloads
88: Home
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Home
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: News
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Photo Gallery
100: Home
101: Downloads
102: Community Forums
103: News Archive
104: Home
105: Community Forums
106: Home
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: Downloads
114: Community Forums
115: News
116: Photo Gallery
117: Photo Gallery
118: Home
119: Community Forums
120: Home
121: Home
122: Community Forums
123: Community Forums
124: Community Forums
125: Home
126: Member Screenshots
127: Community Forums
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Photo Gallery
132: Home
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Home
138: Community Forums
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: Downloads
142: Community Forums
143: Photo Gallery
144: Member Screenshots
145: Home
146: Home
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Statistics
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Photo Gallery
162: Community Forums
163: Photo Gallery
164: Home
165: Home
166: Community Forums
167: Community Forums
168: Home
169: Community Forums
170: Photo Gallery
171: Community Forums
172: News
173: Statistics
174: News Archive
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Photo Gallery
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: Community Forums
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Home
185: Community Forums
186: Home
187: Home
188: Community Forums
189: Home
190: Photo Gallery
191: Downloads
192: Community Forums
193: Home
194: Community Forums
195: Home
196: Community Forums
197: Home
198: Home
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Photo Gallery
203: Community Forums
204: News Archive
205: Your Account
206: Home
207: Community Forums
208: Home
209: Home
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Home
213: Community Forums
214: Member Screenshots
215: Home
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Downloads
219: Home
220: Home
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Statistics
224: Community Forums
225: Home
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Photo Gallery
231: Community Forums
232: Photo Gallery
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Photo Gallery
236: Downloads
237: Statistics
238: Community Forums
239: Member Screenshots
240: Community Forums
241: Member Screenshots
242: Community Forums
243: Home
244: Community Forums
245: Home
246: Home
247: Member Screenshots
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Home
251: Community Forums
252: Home
253: Photo Gallery
254: Photo Gallery
255: Home
256: Downloads
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Home
267: Photo Gallery
268: Downloads
269: Home
270: Home
271: Home
272: Community Forums
273: Downloads
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Home
278: Community Forums
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: Home
283: Member Screenshots
284: Member Screenshots
285: Member Screenshots
286: Community Forums
287: Community Forums
288: Community Forums
289: Downloads
290: Community Forums
291: Photo Gallery
292: Home
293: Community Forums
294: Photo Gallery
295: Your Account
296: Your Account
297: Downloads
298: Community Forums
299: Home
300: Member Screenshots
301: Community Forums
302: Community Forums
303: Home
304: Community Forums
305: Home
306: Downloads
307: Community Forums
308: Community Forums
309: Home
310: Member Screenshots
311: Home
312: Community Forums
313: Home
314: Community Forums
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Home
319: Home
320: Downloads
321: Search
322: Photo Gallery
323: Photo Gallery
324: Downloads

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
76mm "Anti-personnel" rounds in Korea?
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 6:53 pm
Post subject: 76mm "Anti-personnel" rounds in Korea?

Hello,

Joe DeMarco and me are looking for any information about rounds of "anti-personnel shells" that can be seen on this photo, taken in August, 1952. Do someone know if it was a standard ammo, and if yes, what's the official nomenclature designation? The photo shows 7 of them on the right side.

thanks




_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Pzkpfw-e
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jul 21, 2010
Posts: 1202

PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 6:56 pm
Post subject: Re: 76mm "Anti-personnel" rounds in Korea?

Shrapnel, I'd guess.
Back to top
View user's profile
Rick_Eshleman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 26, 2011
Posts: 909
Location: Lewes, Delaware, USA
PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 9:08 pm
Post subject: Re: 76mm "Anti-personnel" rounds in Korea?

I thought of "Beehive" ammunition, but after checking it out found that it was only used in Vietnam (8000 flechette's it sounded like a beehive when fired). Anti-personnel ammunition in Korea would have a time fuze on front of the round and dispense shrapnel at about 7' overhead of enemy troops. I didn't find any M numbers for it in my search.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address Photo Gallery
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 9:24 pm
Post subject: Re: 76mm "Anti-personnel" rounds in Korea?

do you think that it could have been locally made?

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Rick_Eshleman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 26, 2011
Posts: 909
Location: Lewes, Delaware, USA
PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 10:11 pm
Post subject: Re: 76mm "Anti-personnel" rounds in Korea?

If You mean local, as in Korea or Japan, I doubt it. I used to work for a company in Pennsylvania that made fuzes. Proximity, timers, Safe and Arm devices, etc. A timer fuze was too complex to have been built in Korea or Japan after WW II. Both countries needed outside help for military equipment at the time. Rick
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 3:34 am
Post subject: Re: 76mm "Anti-personnel" rounds in Korea?

- Rick_Eshleman
I thought of "Beehive" ammunition, but after checking it out found that it was only used in Vietnam (8000 flechette's it sounded like a beehive when fired). Anti-personnel ammunition in Korea would have a time fuze on front of the round and dispense shrapnel at about 7' overhead of enemy troops. I didn't find any M numbers for it in my search.


I'm totally open to correction on this matter of detail, but my recollection is that "beehive" was generally an artillery round or M-48 90mm AP round that traveled a fuze-set time before opening (and generally resembled a conventional round). "Canister" was the VN-era round that was just what it resembled...a big, black shotgun shell housing flechettes (10K in the 152mm) that were liberated as soon as the container was ripped apart by air resistance (which is to say, right NOW). The AP round for the 90 had the "diamond" symbols on it. I don't recall that the Can round did. The terms get used interchangeably, but are not quite the same thing.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Rick_Eshleman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 26, 2011
Posts: 909
Location: Lewes, Delaware, USA
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 9:44 am
Post subject: Re: 76mm "Anti-personnel" rounds in Korea?

The M546 "beehive" were used on 105mm howitzer, but one article mentions they were "beehive" (not M546, I would guess) made for recoiless, 90mm, 106mm, ontos, and M48 tanks. This does leave out 76mm guns. I did find this video on flickr youtu.be/mk6wxBQ3f_0 which shows what looks like the tube of a 105mm M1 tank firing a "beehive" round in slow motion. The range used appears to be the Main Front at APG.
Doug, You're right about canister being the 152mm anti-personnel round.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail AIM Address Photo Gallery
Kurt_Laughlin
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 577

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:09 am
Post subject: Re: 76mm "Anti-personnel" rounds in Korea?

P-O, I have some Ordnance ammunition SNLs from that era, I will check tonight.

I don't recall seeing any reference to such rounds before but I was generally looking at earlier eras. It might have been an experimental (T-series) cartridge.

KL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
piney
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 2330
Location: Republic of Southern New Jersey
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 1:55 pm
Post subject: Re: 76mm "Anti-personnel" rounds in Korea?

- Rick_Eshleman
I thought of "Beehive" ammunition, but after checking it out found that it was only used in Vietnam (8000 flechette's it sounded like a beehive when fired). Anti-personnel ammunition in Korea would have a time fuze on front of the round and dispense shrapnel at about 7' overhead of enemy troops. I didn't find any M numbers for it in my search.


105 Beehive was available in Korea in the 1970's. My best bud was in Fire Direction Control and told me they had beehive to deal with potential human wave attacks and that it could be set to open anywhere from muzzle to max range and also had open sights available if needed

_________________
The only good skwerril is a dead un
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Kurt_Laughlin
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 577

PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2015 2:48 pm
Post subject: Re: 76mm "Anti-personnel" rounds in Korea?

I could not find anything standardized in the 1951 ammunition catalog. I searched several other operational and technical documents but could not find a mention there either. By 1963 a 76mm BEEHIVE round for the gun used in the M41 tank had been standardized, along with rounds for other calibers. Undoubtedly these were developed as a result of Chinese tactics in Korea. It is quite possible that developmental rounds were in the field by 1952. It will require further research to determine what they might have been.

KL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Dennis_Smith
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 17, 2006
Posts: 192

PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2015 4:16 pm
Post subject: Re: 76mm "Anti-personnel" rounds in Korea?

Wikipedia article on 75mm gun mentions T-30 canister shot that was full of ball bearings. Said it was used in Pacific during WW2. I doubt it was pointy nose like the rounds in the picture though.
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2015 6:10 pm
Post subject: Re: 76mm "Anti-personnel" rounds in Korea?

Joe told me that he guessed the photographer misinterpreted the marking "AP" (armor piercing) as "Anti Personnel".

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Kurt_Laughlin
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 577

PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2015 7:29 pm
Post subject: Re: 76mm "Anti-personnel" rounds in Korea?

P-O, do you have a larger version of that photo to look at?

KL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 12:52 am
Post subject: Re: 76mm "Anti-personnel" rounds in Korea?

this is the largest file I could get

the.shadock.free.fr/sh...B_8-52.jpg

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Kurt_Laughlin
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 577

PostPosted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 1:16 am
Post subject: Re: 76mm "Anti-personnel" rounds in Korea?

Thanks P-O. I wanted to see if the "anti-personnel" had fuzes. They don't, so Joe's guess is probably right.

KL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum