±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 380
Total: 380
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Downloads
02: Community Forums
03: Home
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Home
09: Home
10: Community Forums
11: Member Screenshots
12: Home
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Photo Gallery
16: Home
17: Downloads
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Member Screenshots
23: Home
24: Community Forums
25: Member Screenshots
26: Downloads
27: Community Forums
28: Photo Gallery
29: Community Forums
30: Your Account
31: Community Forums
32: Downloads
33: Home
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Home
38: Home
39: Downloads
40: Community Forums
41: Downloads
42: Community Forums
43: Home
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Downloads
47: Community Forums
48: Home
49: Home
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Member Screenshots
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Home
57: Downloads
58: Photo Gallery
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Photo Gallery
62: Home
63: Downloads
64: Community Forums
65: Downloads
66: Community Forums
67: Home
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: Community Forums
71: Home
72: Community Forums
73: Home
74: Statistics
75: Community Forums
76: Home
77: Community Forums
78: Home
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: Member Screenshots
84: Downloads
85: Downloads
86: Downloads
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Downloads
90: Member Screenshots
91: Community Forums
92: Home
93: Photo Gallery
94: Community Forums
95: Home
96: Community Forums
97: Home
98: Home
99: Member Screenshots
100: Photo Gallery
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Home
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Member Screenshots
107: Community Forums
108: Home
109: Community Forums
110: Member Screenshots
111: Home
112: Home
113: Home
114: Home
115: Community Forums
116: Home
117: Member Screenshots
118: Community Forums
119: Member Screenshots
120: Community Forums
121: Home
122: Home
123: Member Screenshots
124: Home
125: Home
126: Home
127: Community Forums
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Home
133: Community Forums
134: Downloads
135: Community Forums
136: Member Screenshots
137: Home
138: Community Forums
139: Home
140: Community Forums
141: Home
142: Home
143: Community Forums
144: Member Screenshots
145: Community Forums
146: Your Account
147: Photo Gallery
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Photo Gallery
152: Member Screenshots
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Member Screenshots
156: Home
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Home
160: Photo Gallery
161: Home
162: Community Forums
163: Photo Gallery
164: Home
165: Home
166: Community Forums
167: Downloads
168: Community Forums
169: Home
170: Downloads
171: Community Forums
172: Member Screenshots
173: Member Screenshots
174: Member Screenshots
175: Community Forums
176: Home
177: Community Forums
178: Photo Gallery
179: Photo Gallery
180: News Archive
181: Community Forums
182: Community Forums
183: Statistics
184: Member Screenshots
185: Member Screenshots
186: Member Screenshots
187: Member Screenshots
188: Your Account
189: Community Forums
190: Home
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Home
196: Community Forums
197: Photo Gallery
198: Downloads
199: News Archive
200: Photo Gallery
201: News Archive
202: Community Forums
203: Photo Gallery
204: Member Screenshots
205: Home
206: Home
207: Photo Gallery
208: Home
209: Home
210: Downloads
211: Photo Gallery
212: Statistics
213: Member Screenshots
214: Photo Gallery
215: Downloads
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Home
219: Home
220: Community Forums
221: Member Screenshots
222: Downloads
223: Home
224: Community Forums
225: Member Screenshots
226: Community Forums
227: Photo Gallery
228: Community Forums
229: Downloads
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Community Forums
233: Member Screenshots
234: Member Screenshots
235: Home
236: Community Forums
237: Downloads
238: Photo Gallery
239: Community Forums
240: Downloads
241: Community Forums
242: Statistics
243: Community Forums
244: Member Screenshots
245: Member Screenshots
246: Community Forums
247: Member Screenshots
248: Member Screenshots
249: Downloads
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Member Screenshots
254: News Archive
255: Photo Gallery
256: Community Forums
257: Home
258: Downloads
259: Community Forums
260: Downloads
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Home
265: Home
266: Member Screenshots
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Member Screenshots
272: Community Forums
273: Photo Gallery
274: Community Forums
275: Member Screenshots
276: Photo Gallery
277: Community Forums
278: Community Forums
279: Member Screenshots
280: Member Screenshots
281: Community Forums
282: Photo Gallery
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Downloads
287: Home
288: Community Forums
289: Downloads
290: Community Forums
291: Home
292: Member Screenshots
293: Photo Gallery
294: Community Forums
295: Photo Gallery
296: Community Forums
297: Downloads
298: Member Screenshots
299: Community Forums
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Home
303: Community Forums
304: Member Screenshots
305: Community Forums
306: Member Screenshots
307: Member Screenshots
308: Photo Gallery
309: Photo Gallery
310: Home
311: Community Forums
312: Home
313: Downloads
314: LinkToUs
315: Home
316: Photo Gallery
317: News Archive
318: Photo Gallery
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Downloads
322: Community Forums
323: Community Forums
324: Downloads
325: Home
326: Community Forums
327: Community Forums
328: Downloads
329: Community Forums
330: News Archive
331: Downloads
332: Home
333: Community Forums
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: Photo Gallery
337: Community Forums
338: Community Forums
339: Community Forums
340: Member Screenshots
341: Community Forums
342: Home
343: Community Forums
344: Community Forums
345: Home
346: Community Forums
347: Downloads
348: Member Screenshots
349: Community Forums
350: Community Forums
351: Photo Gallery
352: Downloads
353: Community Forums
354: Photo Gallery
355: Community Forums
356: Community Forums
357: Statistics
358: Community Forums
359: Downloads
360: Downloads
361: Home
362: Member Screenshots
363: Community Forums
364: Community Forums
365: Community Forums
366: Photo Gallery
367: Photo Gallery
368: Community Forums
369: Community Forums
370: News Archive
371: Home
372: Member Screenshots
373: Community Forums
374: Community Forums
375: Downloads
376: Community Forums
377: Home
378: Photo Gallery
379: Downloads
380: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
78 year old operable bombers? :: Archived
A general meeting place for all pilots!
Post new topic    Revive this topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  Officer's Club

Topic Archived View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
JG300-Ascout
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 6257
Location: Cyberspace
PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 12:16 am
Post subject: 78 year old operable bombers?

Too bad nobody's fighting for a replacement bomb truck. High tech is nice, but sometimes range and load comes in mighty handy. But it ain't got no sponsor...
____________________________________________________________

From National Defense Magazine:

The longest serving military aircraft in the world, the B-52 Stratofortess, often is praised for its storied history, but it also has become a symbol of the Pentagon's inertia in moving forward with the development of a new bomber.

“I think there's been a huge disparity in how much money is invested in bombers versus the short-range aircraft,� said Rep. Norm Dicks, D-Wash.

“There still isn't a program for a new replacement bomber, and there needs to be,� he told a Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments forum. The Air Force, Dicks said, is “limping along� with aging bombers.

Retired general and former head of the Air Combat Command, Richard Hawley, said the Defense Department needs to start planning for a new generation of bombers to be deployed by 2020 at the latest. “We've got to get off this do-nothing kick,� he added.

The Air Force, meanwhile, does not appear to be in any hurry to build a new bomber, and maintains that the Stratofortress fleet is healthy enough to continue to fly for many years.

The B-52 is going to remain in operation for three more decades, Col. James Nally, B-52 program director at Tinker Air Force Base, Okla., told National Defense.

Current plans call for the Air Force to keep the B-52 H-class fleet active until 2040. By that time, the last aircraft to roll off the Boeing assembly line in 1962 will be 78 years old.

Because the B-52's first mission was to stand ready to deliver nuclear payloads, the aircraft spent most of its hours on the tarmac, Nally said. “Even though it's an old airplane, it doesn't have the amount of wear and tear for it that you would expect,� Nally said. “Long term, we don't see any issues with the structure of the airplane.�

Richard Martin, B-52 deputy program director, said the average B-52 is in the air about 250 hours a year. The upper wing surface has a limit of 28,600 to 33,200 hours of life, and the average unit has logged about 12,500 hours so far. Ninety-four aircraft remain in the fleet. “Our chart doesn't go past 2040, but on the line they are on, it could go past 2040 for sure,� Martin added.

The B-52 has evolved greatly from its Cold War days and will continue to add new missions with upgrades, such as the standoff jammer, in the works. Air Force officials said.

The original B-52 models were designed for long-range, high-altitude flights to deliver nuclear payloads. The H-class, however, included defensive and structural modifications that allowed it to fly lower to evade Soviet air defenses. The Air Force then used the B-52 during the Vietnam War to drop conventional munitions, Hawley said. This evolution, from strategic bomber to the close air support it provides today, has made the aircraft the most flexible of the three bombers, its supporters said.

With precision-guided munitions, the “bombers have come of age,� Hawley said. In Operation Desert Storm, the Stratofortress flew more than 1,600 missions while the B-1 was hampered by a bomb-loading process that took nearly 24 hours, said Hawley, who has in the past advocated cutting both the B-52 and B-1 programs.

Upgrades to replace obsolete components, such as avionics, and to add new capabilities continue, Nally said. Bethesda, Md.-based Lockheed Martin currently is upgrading the B-52's mission computers with the avionics control unit to increase its power and allow the aircraft to deploy new precisions weapons. The upgrades are expected to be completed by 2009.

Communications modifications will include the satellite-based Link 16 system, which allows for in-flight retasking and connectivity to ground forces. Structural upgrades for the fuselage and wings extending the B-52's life took place from 1964 to 1985, Martin added.

The standoff jammer is the next phase in the evolution, Nally said. The Stratofortress will not only have the ability to protect itself, but other aircraft in the theater by interrupting any kind of communications the enemy can employ including surface-to-air missiles, aircraft-to-aircraft communications and data transfers. The Air Force is still in the contractor-selection process with development not due to begin for another two years. The jammer won't be fielded until 2015-2016, Nally added.

Even with new capabilities not due to come on line until the middle of the next decade, new-bomber advocates such as Dicks�whose 6th district includes Boeing's manufacturing base� said now is the time to look for a replacement.

However, since the disbanding of the Strategic Air Command in 1992 there are few left within the Air Force willing to take up the mantle for long-range strike aircraft, Dicks said.

Nally sounded an optimistic note on the future of the B-52, perhaps not what proponents of a new bomber want to hear. Not only is the aircraft proving its worth on a daily basis in Afghanistan and Iraq, it could continue to serve a vital role on future conflicts for decades to come, even beyond the 2040 retirement date.

“Structurally it's doable, but even if it is doable, it's not necessarily a given the Air Force would choose to do that,� Nally said.

_________________
"All facts go to clearly prove that Shades is a thrice-cursed traitor & mentally deranged person steeped in inveterate enmity toward mankind"
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
XcalibeR
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 11, 2005
Posts: 358

PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:21 am
Post subject: Re: 78 year old operable bombers?

Really, I don't think there is a need for a new bomber. Cruise Missles and planes like the F-16 and F-18 can do the same job much faster, more accuratly, and are more flexible. Now I'm not saying we should stop using the B-52. By all means, use them as long as they'll stay in one peice. But by the time they go out of service, will there still be a need for heavy bombers?

_________________


[TSF]Lt. Col. XcalibeR{5thF}
PG_Raptor
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JG300-Ascout
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 2005
Posts: 6257
Location: Cyberspace
PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 2:03 am
Post subject: Re: 78 year old operable bombers?

- XcalibeR
Really, I don't think there is a need for a new bomber. Cruise Missles and planes like the F-16 and F-18 can do the same job much faster, more accuratly, and are more flexible. Now I'm not saying we should stop using the B-52. By all means, use them as long as they'll stay in one peice. But by the time they go out of service, will there still be a need for heavy bombers?


A few long range heavy bombers are always useful where you don't have the kind of beautifully displayed discreet targets that can be pinpointed by smart weapons. F15's and FA-18's do not have the capabilty to travel great distance with substantial bomb loads, loiter, or hit multiple targets over a wide area. We haven't been confronted by such a targeting scenario lately, but it's always a possibility. Large, dispersed formations or activity under cover (like jungle and heavy wood) do not lend themselves to precision-guided munitions...nor artillery if they are far over the horizon.

To put it in a context within living memory, making stands like at Khe Sanh or several other beleagured installations would not have been possible without them.

I wouldn't advocate building a fleet of a thousand, but 100-200 can be a useful arrow to have in your quiver when the enemy is numerous, far away, and concealed by vegetation or weather.

_________________
"All facts go to clearly prove that Shades is a thrice-cursed traitor & mentally deranged person steeped in inveterate enmity toward mankind"
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Revive this topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  Officer's Club
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours

Archive Revive
Username:
This is an archived topic - your reply will not be appended here.
Instead, a new topic will be generated in the active forum.
The new topic will provide a reference link to this archived topic.