±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 425
Total: 425
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Home
03: Home
04: Member Screenshots
05: Member Screenshots
06: Home
07: Home
08: Community Forums
09: Home
10: Community Forums
11: Home
12: Community Forums
13: Photo Gallery
14: Photo Gallery
15: Member Screenshots
16: Downloads
17: Home
18: Member Screenshots
19: Community Forums
20: Home
21: Community Forums
22: Member Screenshots
23: Community Forums
24: Photo Gallery
25: Community Forums
26: Home
27: News Archive
28: Home
29: Home
30: Home
31: Community Forums
32: Member Screenshots
33: Community Forums
34: Home
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Home
38: News Archive
39: Member Screenshots
40: Member Screenshots
41: Photo Gallery
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Home
48: Community Forums
49: Home
50: Member Screenshots
51: Community Forums
52: Home
53: Home
54: Member Screenshots
55: Member Screenshots
56: Community Forums
57: Photo Gallery
58: Home
59: Community Forums
60: Home
61: Photo Gallery
62: Member Screenshots
63: Photo Gallery
64: Downloads
65: Downloads
66: Downloads
67: Downloads
68: Photo Gallery
69: Home
70: Home
71: Member Screenshots
72: Member Screenshots
73: Downloads
74: Photo Gallery
75: Home
76: Home
77: Member Screenshots
78: Downloads
79: Community Forums
80: Member Screenshots
81: Community Forums
82: News Archive
83: Photo Gallery
84: Member Screenshots
85: Community Forums
86: Downloads
87: Downloads
88: Community Forums
89: Downloads
90: Photo Gallery
91: Home
92: Home
93: Community Forums
94: Home
95: Community Forums
96: Member Screenshots
97: Photo Gallery
98: Member Screenshots
99: Community Forums
100: Member Screenshots
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Downloads
104: Member Screenshots
105: Home
106: Member Screenshots
107: News Archive
108: Downloads
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Home
112: Downloads
113: Home
114: Home
115: Home
116: Home
117: Member Screenshots
118: Photo Gallery
119: Member Screenshots
120: Home
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Member Screenshots
124: Home
125: Member Screenshots
126: Home
127: Home
128: Home
129: Your Account
130: Home
131: Community Forums
132: News Archive
133: Community Forums
134: Home
135: Downloads
136: Community Forums
137: Downloads
138: Downloads
139: Member Screenshots
140: Community Forums
141: Home
142: Community Forums
143: Home
144: Member Screenshots
145: Member Screenshots
146: Photo Gallery
147: Member Screenshots
148: Community Forums
149: Photo Gallery
150: Home
151: Community Forums
152: Downloads
153: Member Screenshots
154: Home
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Home
158: Photo Gallery
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Photo Gallery
162: Home
163: Home
164: Home
165: Member Screenshots
166: Community Forums
167: Downloads
168: Home
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Downloads
172: Member Screenshots
173: Community Forums
174: Member Screenshots
175: Photo Gallery
176: Member Screenshots
177: Home
178: Home
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: Member Screenshots
182: Community Forums
183: News Archive
184: Member Screenshots
185: Community Forums
186: News Archive
187: Photo Gallery
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: Home
191: News
192: Member Screenshots
193: Home
194: Community Forums
195: Photo Gallery
196: Community Forums
197: Home
198: Home
199: Downloads
200: Photo Gallery
201: Member Screenshots
202: Member Screenshots
203: Home
204: Home
205: Photo Gallery
206: Downloads
207: Photo Gallery
208: Photo Gallery
209: Home
210: Member Screenshots
211: Home
212: Member Screenshots
213: Home
214: Downloads
215: Photo Gallery
216: News Archive
217: Home
218: News
219: Member Screenshots
220: Downloads
221: Home
222: Home
223: Community Forums
224: Community Forums
225: Home
226: Home
227: Home
228: Member Screenshots
229: Home
230: Home
231: Home
232: Home
233: Community Forums
234: Home
235: Community Forums
236: Home
237: Member Screenshots
238: Member Screenshots
239: Community Forums
240: Member Screenshots
241: Photo Gallery
242: Photo Gallery
243: Home
244: Home
245: Community Forums
246: Treasury
247: News Archive
248: Home
249: Community Forums
250: Statistics
251: Community Forums
252: Home
253: Member Screenshots
254: Member Screenshots
255: Your Account
256: Home
257: Home
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Photo Gallery
261: Community Forums
262: Photo Gallery
263: Photo Gallery
264: Member Screenshots
265: Member Screenshots
266: Downloads
267: Community Forums
268: Statistics
269: Community Forums
270: Statistics
271: Community Forums
272: Downloads
273: Home
274: Downloads
275: Member Screenshots
276: Home
277: Downloads
278: Home
279: Downloads
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: Home
283: Home
284: Member Screenshots
285: Community Forums
286: Member Screenshots
287: Community Forums
288: Downloads
289: Community Forums
290: Home
291: Community Forums
292: Downloads
293: Community Forums
294: Home
295: Home
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: News Archive
300: Photo Gallery
301: Home
302: Downloads
303: Home
304: Photo Gallery
305: Downloads
306: Community Forums
307: Photo Gallery
308: Home
309: Home
310: Home
311: News Archive
312: Member Screenshots
313: Community Forums
314: Home
315: Member Screenshots
316: Member Screenshots
317: Home
318: Member Screenshots
319: Downloads
320: Home
321: Community Forums
322: Downloads
323: Community Forums
324: Statistics
325: Home
326: Home
327: Home
328: Community Forums
329: Home
330: Your Account
331: Home
332: Member Screenshots
333: Community Forums
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: Photo Gallery
337: Home
338: Home
339: Home
340: Home
341: Member Screenshots
342: Member Screenshots
343: Member Screenshots
344: Photo Gallery
345: Home
346: Home
347: Downloads
348: Home
349: Community Forums
350: Home
351: Downloads
352: Photo Gallery
353: Downloads
354: Home
355: Community Forums
356: Community Forums
357: Home
358: Home
359: Community Forums
360: Home
361: Home
362: Home
363: Community Forums
364: Home
365: News Archive
366: Member Screenshots
367: Home
368: Member Screenshots
369: Your Account
370: Community Forums
371: Community Forums
372: Home
373: Downloads
374: Home
375: Community Forums
376: Home
377: Community Forums
378: Community Forums
379: Community Forums
380: Member Screenshots
381: Downloads
382: Photo Gallery
383: Home
384: Photo Gallery
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Photo Gallery
388: Community Forums
389: Downloads
390: Photo Gallery
391: Home
392: Home
393: Home
394: Downloads
395: Home
396: Home
397: Home
398: Home
399: Member Screenshots
400: Home
401: Community Forums
402: Home
403: Home
404: Member Screenshots
405: Home
406: Member Screenshots
407: Member Screenshots
408: Community Forums
409: Home
410: Home
411: Member Screenshots
412: Home
413: Photo Gallery
414: Downloads
415: Community Forums
416: Photo Gallery
417: Community Forums
418: Home
419: Community Forums
420: Member Screenshots
421: Downloads
422: Home
423: Home
424: Community Forums
425: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Hey Roy!
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
DCCLarke
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 62

PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:42 am
Post subject: Hey Roy!

Sorry to be so rude as to call you out on the forum, my good friend. But, I need a professional opinion from a Scout! I know you're not a German Armor afficionado--no one's perfect--but I wanted to ask you what you thought of this vehicle for scouting purposes:


Okay, four man crew, 20 mm. automatic cannon, 60 Km/hr (30Km/hr. cross country), 15.3 horsepower per metric ton, two radios in some versions, one of which was short range, the other good for 25 Km. while moving and armor sufficient to stop 7.62mm rounds from the sides, 20mm rounds from the front. Total weight, about 12 tons, range about 138 miles or eight hours of operation without refueling.

So my friend, does it cut it as a reconnaissance vehicle in your opinion? Smile Smile Smile What would you like changed in a WWII envirnment?

Best,
David
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 2:07 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

Is it a fully automatic 20mm? I thought it was a clip fed weapon that was used in a semiautomatic mode and not a 'Machine cannon' similar to the Oerlikon or Hispano 20mm that were used in aircraft or antiaircraft roles

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
DCCLarke
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 62

PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 2:13 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

Quite right Bob! Sorry, an excess of enthusiasm!

If memory serves, the Luchs carried 33 clips, each of 8 rounds of 20mm ammunition.

Thanks for the correction! Smile

Best,
David
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 7:04 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

Hi David! Hi Folks!

"Sorry to be so rude as to call you out on the forum, my good friend."

No problem Sir! That is why I hang out at places like this!

"I wanted to ask you what you thought of this vehicle for scouting purposes"

I only saw a red "X", no photo, but from your second post I am guessing you are talking about the Luchs light tank.

"four man crew, 20 mm. automatic cannon, 60 Km/hr (30Km/hr. cross country), 15.3 horsepower per metric ton, two radios in some versions, one of which was short range, the other good for 25 Km. while moving and armor sufficient to stop 7.62mm rounds from the sides, 20mm rounds from the front. Total weight, about 12 tons, range about 138 miles or eight hours of operation without refueling."

"So my friend, does it cut it as a reconnaissance vehicle in your opinion? What would you like changed in a WWII envirnment?"

I would think it would make a very good LIGHT recon vehicle. Much better than a US M3 Scout Car, M8 Armored Car, or the M3/M5 light tanks with and without turrets. Anything would be better than a jeep with a machine gun. But then a jeep with a heavy machine gun is better that a walking infantry that is carrying any machine gun.

I some ways, the WWII German Luchs light tank is a bit like the M114A2 and M113 1/2 Lynx C&R vehicles. If it was mechanical sound and didn't break down like the M114 did, I would think it would be OK.

That would be this old Scout's professional opinion.
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
recon4ww2
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 117
Location: western Ohio
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 11:35 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

David,

I'm a former Scout myself. First I rode a Kawasaki KL250 in the 101st AB,
B troop 2/17th Cav. in 83.Then I was a driver and later gunner on an M-3 Bradley. I gotta tell ya, the Bradley was a fun toy but most of the Scouts in my platoon were not impressed with it as a Scout vehicle! Too big, too loud and the early trany sucked! But worst of all, once we got them we virtually quit training a Scouts It was all gunnery gunnery gunnery! We would have been very weak on the basic scout skills after that such as route recon, bridge classification etc. Sure we loved the firepower we had but a Scout should never need that much to do what Scouts should do. I would have preferred something like a M-114.
So I guess I would also have preferred the Luchs at that time, as a matter of fact I would have preferred the Current Spahapanzer Luchs over the M3!

Sorry for the long post and I'll probably get nuked by the Bradley lovers out there, but it's just my opinion.

Mike Haines
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 11:45 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

Mike

Not a 'Bradley lover' I agree about the modern SP Luchs.

In WWII era:
US: The Jeep was perhaps the best for recon vehicle along with the M20.

German: I would chose the Sd Kfz 222 over the 'Luchs'. Its smaller (?) quieter, and still retains the 2cm/MG42 for protection. For lightweight, perhaps the Kubel/Schwimwagen ?

British: The 'land rover' truck used in Africa. Not sure of the name.

I'm sure this will generate some postings as it may become a 'popularity' contest of armament over stealth.

Let the discussions begin....

Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
David_Reasoner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 127
Location: South Central Kentucky
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:13 pm
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

- Dontos

British: The 'land rover' truck used in Africa. Not sure of the name.

Don


The LRDG used a variety of trucks during the war. The most popular and best remembered was the 30cwt (1 1/2 ton) Chevy. These were actually 4x2 trucks without a driven front axle. The LRDG later received 4x4 Ford CMP based vehicles, but doesn't seem to have been as impressed with them. Evidently the advantage of four-wheel-drive was not seen as adequate compensation for the increase in weight. Desert patrols were a real endurance test for both men and machines, most patrols included a fitter's vehicle stocked with spare leaf springs and spring shackles, amongst other things.

David
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 2:30 pm
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

As I see it the problem with the Luchs is that it is probably almost as resource intensive to produce as a Pz III or PZ IV. You have the complexity of a turret including the machining of a turret ring, a very complex suspension and drive train, etc. All requiring a complex assembly process that could have been better occupied turning out medium tanks.

An M3 scout car has he advantage of being much simpler to produce and can be produced by any medium truck assembly line. The M20 is a little more complex but still uses mass produced drivetrain parts.

So from a 'total war' point of view where you have to consider the impact of a weapon system in terms of the resources it takes to field it I'm not sure the Luchs is the better scout vehicle

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
DCCLarke
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 62

PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 11:53 pm
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

Hi Bob, I really wasn't considering the Luchs in terms of its cost effectiveness. All Luchs production, as you know, was finished by February 1943 and I believe that fact alone indicates that the Germans agreed with you that the Luchs was sort of a "luxury" vehicle. In fact, probably the most often used German scout vehicle by the late war years was the Sd. Kfz. 250 series of halftracks.

Say Roy, I don't know why you get a red "X" instead of a photo. The photo shows for me on both my AOL and Netscape browser.

But, anyway, I was interested in how the Luchs stacked up against other vehicles designed for reconnaissance.

So, I'm a little curious as to the similarities between it and the legendary M-114 "Lingle" of the sixties and seventies.

The "Lingle" weighed in at slightly over 6 tons and had about the same Hp/weight ratio--15hp/ton. The Lingle used an 8 cylinder gasoline engine producing 160 hp at 4200 rpms vs. the Luch's 180 hp at 3200 rpms.

Length:
14.64 ft. (Lingle)
14 ft. 2 1/2 inches (Luchs)
Height:
7 ft. over 50. cal. MG (Lingle)
6 ft. 7ins. (Luchs)
Width:
7.64 feet (Lingle)
8 ft. 2ins. (Luchs)
Ground pressure:
5.1 psi. (Lingle)
.77kg/square cm (I can't do this conversion, help?) Luchs

Physically, the two vehicles seem to have a lot of similarities, which is a little odd, considering they were produced in different decades!

So, any opinions on the great Lingle vs. Luchs debate? Laughing Laughing Laughing

Best,
David
Back to top
View user's profile
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:19 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

David

I think the biggest difference with recon in mind, is that the 'Lingle' carries additional personnel to successfully cover more terrain while dismounted thus the operating crew can be prepared to 'bug out' should the occasion arise.

I assume the Luchs has a crew of 3 or 4. This would prevent dismounting unless leaving the vehicle short crewed.

Just a few thoughts on the two
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
DCCLarke
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 62

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:22 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

Hi Don! The Luchs carried a crew of 4--commander, radio operator, driver and gunner. And it was really tight inside. The Lingle definitely has the edge on interior space, but I always thought the crew was three, didn't know that dismounts were normally carried.

Best,
David
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:59 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

- recon4ww2
David,

I'm a former Scout myself. First I rode a Kawasaki KL250 in the 101st AB,
B troop 2/17th Cav. in 83.Then I was a driver and later gunner on an M-3 Bradley. I gotta tell ya, the Bradley was a fun toy but most of the Scouts in my platoon were not impressed with it as a Scout vehicle! Too big, too loud and the early trany sucked! But worst of all, once we got them we virtually quit training a Scouts It was all gunnery gunnery gunnery! We would have been very weak on the basic scout skills after that such as route recon, bridge classification etc. Sure we loved the firepower we had but a Scout should never need that much to do what Scouts should do. I would have preferred something like a M-114.
So I guess I would also have preferred the Luchs at that time, as a matter of fact I would have preferred the Current Spahapanzer Luchs over the M3!

Sorry for the long post and I'll probably get nuked by the Bradley lovers out there, but it's just my opinion.

Mike Haines


Nope, scouts definately got screwed in the late 70s/early 80s by the decision to cancel ARSV and merge the requirement with the emerging MICV program that lead to the Bradley. Its probably a good IFV, but its "scouting in a winnebago."

IMO, the XM800T would have made a good scout vehicle and would probably still be in service today - upgraded with a second gen FLIR, etc. I think the XM800s often get a bad rap. Yet note the following from Hunnicutt's Bradley (page 244):

"In comparing the two XM800 vehicles with the baseline M113A1, the test report concluded that the XM800T was superior to both the M113A1 and the XM800W in overal performance as an ARSV. The XM800W performed well on roads and its quiet operation and high road speed were goals to be achieved for future scout vehicles. However, its limited cross country capability and safety hazards associated with lateral instability and directional control made it less effective than the M113A1."

XM800T



Gotta love the plaque: "Armor will achieve this ground mobility [ie the scout role] by organization, training, mission and a state of mind."



XM800W



Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
DCCLarke
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 62

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 1:50 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

Nice post Neil, do you have any specs for the XM800T? I can't seem to find mine and I'd like to compare its autmotive performance with the Luchs and Lingle.

Best,
David
Back to top
View user's profile
recon4ww2
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 117
Location: western Ohio
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:29 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

Hi Neil,

I forgot about the XM 800t, I love that concept. When I first saw it at Knox I couldn't believe it never was fielded.

Mike
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
DCCLarke
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 62

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:00 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

Hi Mike, I always wondered why it never made it to the troops as well. But look at the picture of it and then scroll up to the picture of the Luchs--it doesn't look like the concept has changed much, just the equipment. Perhaps, like the Luchs, it was regarded as too much of a "luxury".

Best,
David
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 3
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum