±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 447
Total: 447
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Home
03: Community Forums
04: Home
05: Member Screenshots
06: Downloads
07: News
08: Home
09: Community Forums
10: Home
11: Home
12: Photo Gallery
13: Member Screenshots
14: Photo Gallery
15: Photo Gallery
16: Downloads
17: Photo Gallery
18: Member Screenshots
19: Community Forums
20: Home
21: Member Screenshots
22: Home
23: Home
24: Member Screenshots
25: Home
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Photo Gallery
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Downloads
32: Community Forums
33: Home
34: Member Screenshots
35: Member Screenshots
36: Member Screenshots
37: Your Account
38: Photo Gallery
39: Photo Gallery
40: Community Forums
41: Photo Gallery
42: Member Screenshots
43: Member Screenshots
44: Downloads
45: Home
46: Photo Gallery
47: Statistics
48: Member Screenshots
49: Member Screenshots
50: Statistics
51: Community Forums
52: Member Screenshots
53: Photo Gallery
54: Home
55: News Archive
56: Community Forums
57: Member Screenshots
58: Downloads
59: Member Screenshots
60: Member Screenshots
61: Community Forums
62: Member Screenshots
63: Downloads
64: Downloads
65: Home
66: Home
67: Member Screenshots
68: Member Screenshots
69: Home
70: Member Screenshots
71: Photo Gallery
72: Home
73: Photo Gallery
74: Member Screenshots
75: Home
76: Community Forums
77: Home
78: Photo Gallery
79: Home
80: Photo Gallery
81: Member Screenshots
82: Photo Gallery
83: Photo Gallery
84: Photo Gallery
85: Photo Gallery
86: Home
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Home
90: News Archive
91: Member Screenshots
92: Home
93: Photo Gallery
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Member Screenshots
97: Home
98: Community Forums
99: Home
100: Photo Gallery
101: Community Forums
102: Member Screenshots
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Member Screenshots
106: Downloads
107: Home
108: Home
109: Home
110: Home
111: Home
112: Photo Gallery
113: Photo Gallery
114: News Archive
115: Member Screenshots
116: Member Screenshots
117: Downloads
118: Community Forums
119: Community Forums
120: Community Forums
121: Photo Gallery
122: Community Forums
123: Photo Gallery
124: Your Account
125: Home
126: Home
127: Community Forums
128: Member Screenshots
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Member Screenshots
132: Member Screenshots
133: Downloads
134: Member Screenshots
135: Community Forums
136: Member Screenshots
137: Community Forums
138: Home
139: Downloads
140: Member Screenshots
141: Photo Gallery
142: Community Forums
143: Member Screenshots
144: Home
145: Photo Gallery
146: News Archive
147: Member Screenshots
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Downloads
151: Downloads
152: Community Forums
153: Home
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Downloads
157: Member Screenshots
158: Photo Gallery
159: Member Screenshots
160: Photo Gallery
161: Home
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Member Screenshots
167: Downloads
168: Community Forums
169: Downloads
170: Downloads
171: Community Forums
172: News Archive
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Home
176: Community Forums
177: Member Screenshots
178: Home
179: Home
180: Community Forums
181: Community Forums
182: Downloads
183: Member Screenshots
184: Photo Gallery
185: Community Forums
186: Downloads
187: Photo Gallery
188: Member Screenshots
189: Community Forums
190: Your Account
191: Home
192: Community Forums
193: Photo Gallery
194: Photo Gallery
195: Community Forums
196: Home
197: Photo Gallery
198: Community Forums
199: Member Screenshots
200: Downloads
201: Home
202: Community Forums
203: Statistics
204: Photo Gallery
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Downloads
208: Home
209: Member Screenshots
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Photo Gallery
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Member Screenshots
216: Photo Gallery
217: Home
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Photo Gallery
221: Community Forums
222: Member Screenshots
223: Member Screenshots
224: News Archive
225: Home
226: Downloads
227: Community Forums
228: Downloads
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Community Forums
233: Member Screenshots
234: Member Screenshots
235: Home
236: Home
237: Community Forums
238: Downloads
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Member Screenshots
242: Community Forums
243: Photo Gallery
244: Community Forums
245: Home
246: Community Forums
247: Member Screenshots
248: Downloads
249: Photo Gallery
250: Downloads
251: Downloads
252: Home
253: Community Forums
254: Member Screenshots
255: Your Account
256: Photo Gallery
257: Member Screenshots
258: Member Screenshots
259: Downloads
260: News Archive
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Photo Gallery
264: Home
265: Photo Gallery
266: Photo Gallery
267: Community Forums
268: Downloads
269: Community Forums
270: Home
271: Home
272: News Archive
273: Photo Gallery
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Home
277: Community Forums
278: Downloads
279: Member Screenshots
280: Home
281: Downloads
282: Community Forums
283: Member Screenshots
284: Home
285: Home
286: Home
287: Downloads
288: Downloads
289: Photo Gallery
290: Community Forums
291: Member Screenshots
292: Member Screenshots
293: Home
294: Home
295: Community Forums
296: Member Screenshots
297: Community Forums
298: Home
299: Community Forums
300: Community Forums
301: News Archive
302: Community Forums
303: Downloads
304: Photo Gallery
305: Community Forums
306: Home
307: Member Screenshots
308: Your Account
309: Member Screenshots
310: News
311: Photo Gallery
312: Member Screenshots
313: Home
314: Home
315: Member Screenshots
316: News Archive
317: Home
318: Member Screenshots
319: Community Forums
320: Photo Gallery
321: Photo Gallery
322: Home
323: Community Forums
324: Community Forums
325: News Archive
326: Home
327: Home
328: Community Forums
329: Member Screenshots
330: Downloads
331: Downloads
332: Home
333: Home
334: Photo Gallery
335: Community Forums
336: Home
337: Home
338: Your Account
339: Member Screenshots
340: Member Screenshots
341: Downloads
342: Community Forums
343: Downloads
344: Photo Gallery
345: Home
346: Downloads
347: Community Forums
348: Member Screenshots
349: Downloads
350: Home
351: News Archive
352: Community Forums
353: Downloads
354: Home
355: Downloads
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Community Forums
359: Community Forums
360: Your Account
361: Member Screenshots
362: Home
363: Member Screenshots
364: Member Screenshots
365: Member Screenshots
366: Member Screenshots
367: Statistics
368: Your Account
369: Community Forums
370: Community Forums
371: Photo Gallery
372: Member Screenshots
373: Photo Gallery
374: Statistics
375: Community Forums
376: Community Forums
377: Home
378: Member Screenshots
379: Photo Gallery
380: Community Forums
381: Home
382: Downloads
383: Photo Gallery
384: Home
385: Home
386: Community Forums
387: Home
388: Community Forums
389: Community Forums
390: Community Forums
391: Home
392: Member Screenshots
393: Photo Gallery
394: Your Account
395: Community Forums
396: Community Forums
397: Downloads
398: Member Screenshots
399: Home
400: News Archive
401: Home
402: Community Forums
403: News Archive
404: Home
405: Your Account
406: Home
407: Community Forums
408: Photo Gallery
409: Photo Gallery
410: Home
411: Home
412: Community Forums
413: Downloads
414: Community Forums
415: Statistics
416: Member Screenshots
417: Downloads
418: Home
419: Community Forums
420: Community Forums
421: Community Forums
422: Community Forums
423: Photo Gallery
424: Community Forums
425: Home
426: Photo Gallery
427: Community Forums
428: Home
429: Photo Gallery
430: Photo Gallery
431: Member Screenshots
432: Photo Gallery
433: Community Forums
434: Community Forums
435: Photo Gallery
436: Home
437: Downloads
438: Home
439: Community Forums
440: Home
441: Community Forums
442: Member Screenshots
443: Home
444: Photo Gallery
445: Community Forums
446: Member Screenshots
447: Photo Gallery

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Hey Roy!
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
DCCLarke
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 62

PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:42 am
Post subject: Hey Roy!

Sorry to be so rude as to call you out on the forum, my good friend. But, I need a professional opinion from a Scout! I know you're not a German Armor afficionado--no one's perfect--but I wanted to ask you what you thought of this vehicle for scouting purposes:


Okay, four man crew, 20 mm. automatic cannon, 60 Km/hr (30Km/hr. cross country), 15.3 horsepower per metric ton, two radios in some versions, one of which was short range, the other good for 25 Km. while moving and armor sufficient to stop 7.62mm rounds from the sides, 20mm rounds from the front. Total weight, about 12 tons, range about 138 miles or eight hours of operation without refueling.

So my friend, does it cut it as a reconnaissance vehicle in your opinion? Smile Smile Smile What would you like changed in a WWII envirnment?

Best,
David
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 2:07 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

Is it a fully automatic 20mm? I thought it was a clip fed weapon that was used in a semiautomatic mode and not a 'Machine cannon' similar to the Oerlikon or Hispano 20mm that were used in aircraft or antiaircraft roles

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
DCCLarke
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 62

PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 2:13 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

Quite right Bob! Sorry, an excess of enthusiasm!

If memory serves, the Luchs carried 33 clips, each of 8 rounds of 20mm ammunition.

Thanks for the correction! Smile

Best,
David
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 7:04 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

Hi David! Hi Folks!

"Sorry to be so rude as to call you out on the forum, my good friend."

No problem Sir! That is why I hang out at places like this!

"I wanted to ask you what you thought of this vehicle for scouting purposes"

I only saw a red "X", no photo, but from your second post I am guessing you are talking about the Luchs light tank.

"four man crew, 20 mm. automatic cannon, 60 Km/hr (30Km/hr. cross country), 15.3 horsepower per metric ton, two radios in some versions, one of which was short range, the other good for 25 Km. while moving and armor sufficient to stop 7.62mm rounds from the sides, 20mm rounds from the front. Total weight, about 12 tons, range about 138 miles or eight hours of operation without refueling."

"So my friend, does it cut it as a reconnaissance vehicle in your opinion? What would you like changed in a WWII envirnment?"

I would think it would make a very good LIGHT recon vehicle. Much better than a US M3 Scout Car, M8 Armored Car, or the M3/M5 light tanks with and without turrets. Anything would be better than a jeep with a machine gun. But then a jeep with a heavy machine gun is better that a walking infantry that is carrying any machine gun.

I some ways, the WWII German Luchs light tank is a bit like the M114A2 and M113 1/2 Lynx C&R vehicles. If it was mechanical sound and didn't break down like the M114 did, I would think it would be OK.

That would be this old Scout's professional opinion.
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
recon4ww2
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 117
Location: western Ohio
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 11:35 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

David,

I'm a former Scout myself. First I rode a Kawasaki KL250 in the 101st AB,
B troop 2/17th Cav. in 83.Then I was a driver and later gunner on an M-3 Bradley. I gotta tell ya, the Bradley was a fun toy but most of the Scouts in my platoon were not impressed with it as a Scout vehicle! Too big, too loud and the early trany sucked! But worst of all, once we got them we virtually quit training a Scouts It was all gunnery gunnery gunnery! We would have been very weak on the basic scout skills after that such as route recon, bridge classification etc. Sure we loved the firepower we had but a Scout should never need that much to do what Scouts should do. I would have preferred something like a M-114.
So I guess I would also have preferred the Luchs at that time, as a matter of fact I would have preferred the Current Spahapanzer Luchs over the M3!

Sorry for the long post and I'll probably get nuked by the Bradley lovers out there, but it's just my opinion.

Mike Haines
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 11:45 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

Mike

Not a 'Bradley lover' I agree about the modern SP Luchs.

In WWII era:
US: The Jeep was perhaps the best for recon vehicle along with the M20.

German: I would chose the Sd Kfz 222 over the 'Luchs'. Its smaller (?) quieter, and still retains the 2cm/MG42 for protection. For lightweight, perhaps the Kubel/Schwimwagen ?

British: The 'land rover' truck used in Africa. Not sure of the name.

I'm sure this will generate some postings as it may become a 'popularity' contest of armament over stealth.

Let the discussions begin....

Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
David_Reasoner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 127
Location: South Central Kentucky
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:13 pm
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

- Dontos

British: The 'land rover' truck used in Africa. Not sure of the name.

Don


The LRDG used a variety of trucks during the war. The most popular and best remembered was the 30cwt (1 1/2 ton) Chevy. These were actually 4x2 trucks without a driven front axle. The LRDG later received 4x4 Ford CMP based vehicles, but doesn't seem to have been as impressed with them. Evidently the advantage of four-wheel-drive was not seen as adequate compensation for the increase in weight. Desert patrols were a real endurance test for both men and machines, most patrols included a fitter's vehicle stocked with spare leaf springs and spring shackles, amongst other things.

David
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 2:30 pm
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

As I see it the problem with the Luchs is that it is probably almost as resource intensive to produce as a Pz III or PZ IV. You have the complexity of a turret including the machining of a turret ring, a very complex suspension and drive train, etc. All requiring a complex assembly process that could have been better occupied turning out medium tanks.

An M3 scout car has he advantage of being much simpler to produce and can be produced by any medium truck assembly line. The M20 is a little more complex but still uses mass produced drivetrain parts.

So from a 'total war' point of view where you have to consider the impact of a weapon system in terms of the resources it takes to field it I'm not sure the Luchs is the better scout vehicle

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
DCCLarke
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 62

PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 11:53 pm
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

Hi Bob, I really wasn't considering the Luchs in terms of its cost effectiveness. All Luchs production, as you know, was finished by February 1943 and I believe that fact alone indicates that the Germans agreed with you that the Luchs was sort of a "luxury" vehicle. In fact, probably the most often used German scout vehicle by the late war years was the Sd. Kfz. 250 series of halftracks.

Say Roy, I don't know why you get a red "X" instead of a photo. The photo shows for me on both my AOL and Netscape browser.

But, anyway, I was interested in how the Luchs stacked up against other vehicles designed for reconnaissance.

So, I'm a little curious as to the similarities between it and the legendary M-114 "Lingle" of the sixties and seventies.

The "Lingle" weighed in at slightly over 6 tons and had about the same Hp/weight ratio--15hp/ton. The Lingle used an 8 cylinder gasoline engine producing 160 hp at 4200 rpms vs. the Luch's 180 hp at 3200 rpms.

Length:
14.64 ft. (Lingle)
14 ft. 2 1/2 inches (Luchs)
Height:
7 ft. over 50. cal. MG (Lingle)
6 ft. 7ins. (Luchs)
Width:
7.64 feet (Lingle)
8 ft. 2ins. (Luchs)
Ground pressure:
5.1 psi. (Lingle)
.77kg/square cm (I can't do this conversion, help?) Luchs

Physically, the two vehicles seem to have a lot of similarities, which is a little odd, considering they were produced in different decades!

So, any opinions on the great Lingle vs. Luchs debate? Laughing Laughing Laughing

Best,
David
Back to top
View user's profile
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:19 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

David

I think the biggest difference with recon in mind, is that the 'Lingle' carries additional personnel to successfully cover more terrain while dismounted thus the operating crew can be prepared to 'bug out' should the occasion arise.

I assume the Luchs has a crew of 3 or 4. This would prevent dismounting unless leaving the vehicle short crewed.

Just a few thoughts on the two
Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
DCCLarke
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 62

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:22 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

Hi Don! The Luchs carried a crew of 4--commander, radio operator, driver and gunner. And it was really tight inside. The Lingle definitely has the edge on interior space, but I always thought the crew was three, didn't know that dismounts were normally carried.

Best,
David
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:59 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

- recon4ww2
David,

I'm a former Scout myself. First I rode a Kawasaki KL250 in the 101st AB,
B troop 2/17th Cav. in 83.Then I was a driver and later gunner on an M-3 Bradley. I gotta tell ya, the Bradley was a fun toy but most of the Scouts in my platoon were not impressed with it as a Scout vehicle! Too big, too loud and the early trany sucked! But worst of all, once we got them we virtually quit training a Scouts It was all gunnery gunnery gunnery! We would have been very weak on the basic scout skills after that such as route recon, bridge classification etc. Sure we loved the firepower we had but a Scout should never need that much to do what Scouts should do. I would have preferred something like a M-114.
So I guess I would also have preferred the Luchs at that time, as a matter of fact I would have preferred the Current Spahapanzer Luchs over the M3!

Sorry for the long post and I'll probably get nuked by the Bradley lovers out there, but it's just my opinion.

Mike Haines


Nope, scouts definately got screwed in the late 70s/early 80s by the decision to cancel ARSV and merge the requirement with the emerging MICV program that lead to the Bradley. Its probably a good IFV, but its "scouting in a winnebago."

IMO, the XM800T would have made a good scout vehicle and would probably still be in service today - upgraded with a second gen FLIR, etc. I think the XM800s often get a bad rap. Yet note the following from Hunnicutt's Bradley (page 244):

"In comparing the two XM800 vehicles with the baseline M113A1, the test report concluded that the XM800T was superior to both the M113A1 and the XM800W in overal performance as an ARSV. The XM800W performed well on roads and its quiet operation and high road speed were goals to be achieved for future scout vehicles. However, its limited cross country capability and safety hazards associated with lateral instability and directional control made it less effective than the M113A1."

XM800T



Gotta love the plaque: "Armor will achieve this ground mobility [ie the scout role] by organization, training, mission and a state of mind."



XM800W



Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
DCCLarke
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 62

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 1:50 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

Nice post Neil, do you have any specs for the XM800T? I can't seem to find mine and I'd like to compare its autmotive performance with the Luchs and Lingle.

Best,
David
Back to top
View user's profile
recon4ww2
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 117
Location: western Ohio
PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:29 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

Hi Neil,

I forgot about the XM 800t, I love that concept. When I first saw it at Knox I couldn't believe it never was fielded.

Mike
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
DCCLarke
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 62

PostPosted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:00 am
Post subject: Re: Hey Roy!

Hi Mike, I always wondered why it never made it to the troops as well. But look at the picture of it and then scroll up to the picture of the Luchs--it doesn't look like the concept has changed much, just the equipment. Perhaps, like the Luchs, it was regarded as too much of a "luxury".

Best,
David
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 3
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum