±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 203
Total: 203
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: News Archive
03: Home
04: Home
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Home
09: Community Forums
10: Home
11: Community Forums
12: Member Screenshots
13: Photo Gallery
14: Community Forums
15: Member Screenshots
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Home
19: Community Forums
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Home
23: Community Forums
24: Statistics
25: Downloads
26: Member Screenshots
27: Community Forums
28: Statistics
29: News Archive
30: Photo Gallery
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Downloads
34: Downloads
35: Photo Gallery
36: Member Screenshots
37: Community Forums
38: Photo Gallery
39: Community Forums
40: Photo Gallery
41: Downloads
42: Photo Gallery
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Home
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Photo Gallery
51: Downloads
52: Member Screenshots
53: Photo Gallery
54: Community Forums
55: Statistics
56: Community Forums
57: Member Screenshots
58: Community Forums
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Home
63: Home
64: Member Screenshots
65: Photo Gallery
66: Photo Gallery
67: Community Forums
68: Home
69: Photo Gallery
70: Photo Gallery
71: Home
72: Community Forums
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Home
87: Home
88: Community Forums
89: Home
90: Home
91: Community Forums
92: Member Screenshots
93: Community Forums
94: Home
95: Community Forums
96: Community Forums
97: Home
98: Home
99: Community Forums
100: Home
101: Member Screenshots
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Home
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Home
111: Home
112: Community Forums
113: Member Screenshots
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Community Forums
119: Home
120: Community Forums
121: Photo Gallery
122: Community Forums
123: Photo Gallery
124: Community Forums
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: Home
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: News Archive
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Member Screenshots
140: Home
141: Photo Gallery
142: Community Forums
143: Home
144: Home
145: Community Forums
146: Member Screenshots
147: Home
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Member Screenshots
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Home
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Home
157: Community Forums
158: News Archive
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Your Account
163: Community Forums
164: Downloads
165: Downloads
166: Photo Gallery
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Downloads
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Home
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Member Screenshots
180: Community Forums
181: Community Forums
182: Photo Gallery
183: Home
184: Home
185: Home
186: Home
187: Home
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: Community Forums
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Home
194: Community Forums
195: Member Screenshots
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Home
200: Community Forums
201: Downloads
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Recoilless Rifle Question
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 2:59 pm
Post subject: Re: Recoilless Rifle Question

'Weed,
Easy...it's really a conventionally assembled round, but with a lot of perforation holes in the case sides that permit a lot of the propellant to vent. It vents through the breech which itself has large vent holes (which is why it's very dangerous to be behind a RR when it fires). The principle is just to counter the thrust rearwards under recoil with an offsetting thrust to the front. Because there is no resistance of a round in the barrel to the rear, in fact most of the propellant energy is "wasted" in this quest for the "equal and opposite" recoil effect.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
tankmodeler
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 42
Location: Ontario
PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 3:14 pm
Post subject: Re: Recoilless Rifle Question

To elaborate a little on Doug's reply, in physics terms the mass of the projectile exiting out the front of a tube imparts an opposite reaction on a normal cannon, i.e. the recoil. The force generated is equal to the mass of the round times the velocity of the round, Newton's old F=MxA.

For the piece to be "recoilless" the recoil force generated by the shell exiting the front has to be countered by something creating the same force going out the back. For a recoilless rifle there is a relatively high mass shell propelled at a relatively low speed. To counter this you have the relatively small mass of the burnt propellant gasses exiting the breech at a very high speed.

In fact the most efficient RRs use venturies at the breech to increase the speed of the exiting gasses out the back, thus allowing more of the propellant to accellerate the shell.

Paul
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 5:46 pm
Post subject: Re: Recoilless Rifle Question

More details and pics:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...less_rifle

Oh...and some RR's either are rocket propelled, or rocket-assisted after firing...but this is an evolution of the classic recoilless rifle.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Kurt_Laughlin
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 577

PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 6:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Recoilless Rifle Question

IIRC on the old board someone had a link to somebody firing a RR off the shoulder and nearly getting their head torn off by the sight and bracket. Those venturis Paul mentioned are eroded by the exiting gas. As they get worn bigger the Mv (it's more a momentum balance than force balance) going out the back get overwhelmed by the Mv going out the front and the actual recoil keeps increasing until you get what you saw in the film clip.

(C'mon Paul: "mass . . . times the velocity . . ., Newton's old F=MxA". . . You're not using that formula to design anything important are you? :-))

KL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
tankmodeler
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 42
Location: Ontario
PostPosted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 8:49 pm
Post subject: Re: Recoilless Rifle Question

- Kurt_Laughlin
(C'mon Paul: "mass . . . times the velocity . . ., Newton's old F=MxA". . . You're not using that formula to design anything important are you? :-))


F=MA and "You can't push on a rope".

The two cardinal rules of mechanical engineering.

I use them to design _everything_!

Paul
Back to top
View user's profile
Kurt_Laughlin
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 577

PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:52 am
Post subject: Re: Recoilless Rifle Question

- tankmodeler
- Kurt_Laughlin
(C'mon Paul: "mass . . . times the velocity . . ., Newton's old F=MxA". . . You're not using that formula to design anything important are you? :-))


F=MA and "You can't push on a rope".

The two cardinal rules of mechanical engineering.

I use them to design _everything_!



Yeah, F=ma is important, but you described it as force equals mass times velocity . . . That's what made me think I didn't want to stand under it

KL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 10:28 am
Post subject: Re: Recoilless Rifle Question

I think the 'velocity'sion of the formula is
F=MV(2) or as I heard it on the flightline

"Force eguals Mass time velocity squared or a couple pounds of feathers hitting a 400 mph plane makes a a hellavu mess"

Also I remember reading somewhere that Recoiless rifles require up to six times as much propellent as standard guns because so much energy is 'lost' creating the 'equal but opposite' reaction.

Another cardinal rule I was taught back in engineering classes in the days before calculators (Three digit accuaracy is all you get from a slide rule)
was '40.9, 41, 41.1 they are all correct as long as you aren't spanning a 41' river. Then 40.9 and maybe even 41 are the wrong answers'

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
arfraser
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 8

PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 9:07 am
Post subject: Re: Recoilless Rifle Question

- bsmart
Also I remember reading somewhere that Recoiless rifles require up to six times as much propellent as standard guns because so much energy is 'lost' creating the 'equal but opposite' reaction.


The Germans fielded light reciolless rifles (IG1 - 75mm and IG40/41 10.5cm) through to 1944 (predating the Brit work on the Wombat series???). Development started in the 1930's. The rifles were issued to the german para units and rode on a light two-wheeled carriage that folded into a light tripod.

The weapon was retired as soon as the resource demands for the projectiles began to bite (in much the same way that taper-bore AT guns were abandoned).

_________________
Minds are like parachutes - they only function when open -- Sir James Dewar
Back to top
View user's profile
tankmodeler
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 42
Location: Ontario
PostPosted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 12:23 pm
Post subject: Re: Recoilless Rifle Question

Yeah, F=ma is important, but you described it as force equals mass times velocity . . . That's what made me think I didn't want to stand under it
KL


Ah, I see what you're getting at.

Fair enough, it was one simplification too many. Smile

Paul
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum