±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 1222
Total: 1222
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Home
03: Home
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Home
09: Community Forums
10: Home
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Home
15: Home
16: Home
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Home
20: Home
21: News Archive
22: Community Forums
23: Community Forums
24: Home
25: Home
26: Home
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Home
32: Home
33: Community Forums
34: Home
35: Home
36: Community Forums
37: Home
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Member Screenshots
41: Home
42: Community Forums
43: Home
44: Home
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Home
48: Home
49: Home
50: Home
51: Home
52: Home
53: Home
54: Home
55: Home
56: Home
57: Home
58: Community Forums
59: Community Forums
60: Home
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Home
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: Home
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Home
74: Home
75: Community Forums
76: Home
77: Home
78: Community Forums
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Home
82: Community Forums
83: Home
84: Community Forums
85: Home
86: Home
87: Home
88: Photo Gallery
89: Home
90: Home
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Home
95: Home
96: Home
97: Home
98: Home
99: Home
100: Community Forums
101: Home
102: Home
103: Home
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Home
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Home
111: Photo Gallery
112: Home
113: Home
114: Community Forums
115: Downloads
116: Downloads
117: Home
118: Community Forums
119: Home
120: Home
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Home
124: Home
125: Home
126: Home
127: Community Forums
128: Community Forums
129: Home
130: Community Forums
131: Home
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Home
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Community Forums
140: Home
141: Community Forums
142: Home
143: Home
144: Community Forums
145: Home
146: Photo Gallery
147: Community Forums
148: Home
149: Home
150: Home
151: Home
152: Home
153: Home
154: Home
155: Home
156: Community Forums
157: Home
158: Home
159: Home
160: Home
161: Home
162: Home
163: Home
164: Home
165: Home
166: Community Forums
167: Home
168: Home
169: Community Forums
170: Home
171: Home
172: Home
173: Home
174: Home
175: Home
176: Home
177: Home
178: Home
179: Home
180: Home
181: Home
182: Home
183: Community Forums
184: Home
185: Home
186: Home
187: Downloads
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: Home
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Downloads
194: Community Forums
195: Member Screenshots
196: Community Forums
197: Home
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Home
203: Home
204: Community Forums
205: Home
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Home
209: Home
210: Home
211: Community Forums
212: Home
213: Home
214: Home
215: Home
216: Home
217: Home
218: Home
219: Home
220: Community Forums
221: Home
222: Home
223: Home
224: Community Forums
225: Home
226: Home
227: Downloads
228: Community Forums
229: Home
230: Downloads
231: Home
232: Community Forums
233: Photo Gallery
234: Home
235: Home
236: Photo Gallery
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Member Screenshots
240: Community Forums
241: Home
242: News Archive
243: Community Forums
244: Home
245: Community Forums
246: Home
247: Home
248: Community Forums
249: Home
250: Home
251: Home
252: Community Forums
253: Home
254: Home
255: Home
256: Home
257: Community Forums
258: Home
259: Home
260: Community Forums
261: Home
262: Home
263: Statistics
264: Home
265: Community Forums
266: Home
267: Community Forums
268: Downloads
269: Home
270: Home
271: Home
272: Community Forums
273: Home
274: Home
275: Home
276: Home
277: Home
278: Home
279: Home
280: Home
281: Home
282: Home
283: Home
284: Community Forums
285: Home
286: Community Forums
287: Photo Gallery
288: Home
289: Home
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Home
293: Home
294: Home
295: Home
296: Community Forums
297: Home
298: Community Forums
299: Home
300: Home
301: Home
302: Home
303: Home
304: Home
305: Community Forums
306: Home
307: Home
308: Community Forums
309: Home
310: Home
311: Home
312: Home
313: Home
314: Home
315: Home
316: Home
317: Home
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Home
321: Home
322: Community Forums
323: Home
324: Home
325: Community Forums
326: Home
327: Community Forums
328: Home
329: Community Forums
330: Home
331: Home
332: Home
333: Home
334: Community Forums
335: Home
336: Home
337: Community Forums
338: Community Forums
339: Home
340: Community Forums
341: News Archive
342: Community Forums
343: Community Forums
344: Home
345: Home
346: Community Forums
347: Home
348: Community Forums
349: Home
350: Community Forums
351: Home
352: Home
353: Community Forums
354: Community Forums
355: Community Forums
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Community Forums
359: Community Forums
360: Community Forums
361: Community Forums
362: Home
363: Community Forums
364: Home
365: Statistics
366: Home
367: Community Forums
368: Home
369: Home
370: Home
371: Home
372: Community Forums
373: Home
374: Home
375: Home
376: Community Forums
377: Home
378: Community Forums
379: Community Forums
380: Home
381: Home
382: Community Forums
383: Community Forums
384: Home
385: Home
386: Home
387: Home
388: Community Forums
389: Home
390: Home
391: Home
392: Home
393: Home
394: Home
395: Home
396: Home
397: Community Forums
398: Home
399: Home
400: Home
401: Home
402: Home
403: Home
404: Home
405: Home
406: Home
407: Home
408: Community Forums
409: Home
410: Home
411: Home
412: Home
413: Home
414: Community Forums
415: Home
416: Home
417: Home
418: Home
419: Home
420: Home
421: Home
422: Home
423: Home
424: Home
425: Home
426: Home
427: Home
428: Home
429: Home
430: Community Forums
431: Home
432: Home
433: Home
434: Home
435: Home
436: Home
437: Photo Gallery
438: Community Forums
439: Home
440: Community Forums
441: Community Forums
442: Community Forums
443: Home
444: News Archive
445: Community Forums
446: Home
447: Home
448: Home
449: Home
450: Community Forums
451: Home
452: Community Forums
453: Home
454: Photo Gallery
455: Community Forums
456: Community Forums
457: Home
458: Home
459: Home
460: Home
461: Community Forums
462: Home
463: Community Forums
464: Home
465: Home
466: Home
467: Home
468: Home
469: Home
470: Home
471: Home
472: Home
473: Community Forums
474: Community Forums
475: Home
476: Home
477: Community Forums
478: Home
479: Community Forums
480: Home
481: Home
482: Community Forums
483: Home
484: Home
485: Home
486: Home
487: Home
488: Home
489: Home
490: Home
491: Home
492: Community Forums
493: Home
494: Member Screenshots
495: Community Forums
496: Community Forums
497: Home
498: Home
499: Home
500: Home
501: Home
502: Community Forums
503: Community Forums
504: Community Forums
505: Home
506: Home
507: Community Forums
508: Community Forums
509: Home
510: Home
511: Home
512: Home
513: Home
514: Home
515: Home
516: Home
517: Home
518: Home
519: Home
520: Home
521: Community Forums
522: Home
523: Home
524: Home
525: Community Forums
526: Home
527: Photo Gallery
528: Home
529: Community Forums
530: Home
531: Home
532: Home
533: Home
534: Community Forums
535: Home
536: Home
537: Home
538: Home
539: Home
540: Home
541: Photo Gallery
542: Community Forums
543: Home
544: Photo Gallery
545: Home
546: Community Forums
547: Community Forums
548: Community Forums
549: Home
550: Home
551: Community Forums
552: Community Forums
553: Community Forums
554: Home
555: Community Forums
556: Home
557: Photo Gallery
558: Home
559: Home
560: Home
561: Home
562: Community Forums
563: Home
564: Home
565: Home
566: Community Forums
567: Home
568: Home
569: Home
570: Member Screenshots
571: Home
572: Home
573: Home
574: Community Forums
575: Home
576: Community Forums
577: Photo Gallery
578: Home
579: Community Forums
580: Home
581: Community Forums
582: Home
583: Home
584: Home
585: Community Forums
586: Home
587: Community Forums
588: Home
589: Photo Gallery
590: Home
591: Home
592: Community Forums
593: Community Forums
594: Home
595: Home
596: Home
597: Community Forums
598: Community Forums
599: Home
600: Community Forums
601: Home
602: Home
603: Home
604: Community Forums
605: Community Forums
606: Community Forums
607: Home
608: Community Forums
609: Home
610: Home
611: Home
612: Home
613: News Archive
614: Community Forums
615: Photo Gallery
616: Home
617: Community Forums
618: Home
619: Home
620: Home
621: Home
622: Community Forums
623: Home
624: Community Forums
625: Community Forums
626: Home
627: Home
628: Home
629: Home
630: Community Forums
631: Community Forums
632: Home
633: Community Forums
634: Community Forums
635: Community Forums
636: Home
637: Community Forums
638: News Archive
639: Home
640: Community Forums
641: Community Forums
642: Community Forums
643: Home
644: Home
645: Home
646: Community Forums
647: Community Forums
648: Home
649: Community Forums
650: Home
651: Community Forums
652: Home
653: Home
654: Community Forums
655: Community Forums
656: Home
657: Home
658: Community Forums
659: Photo Gallery
660: Community Forums
661: Home
662: Home
663: Home
664: Home
665: Community Forums
666: Home
667: Home
668: Home
669: Home
670: Home
671: Home
672: Home
673: Home
674: Home
675: Home
676: Community Forums
677: Community Forums
678: Community Forums
679: Home
680: Home
681: Community Forums
682: Home
683: Community Forums
684: Home
685: Community Forums
686: Community Forums
687: Home
688: Home
689: Community Forums
690: Community Forums
691: Community Forums
692: Home
693: Community Forums
694: Community Forums
695: Community Forums
696: Home
697: Home
698: Community Forums
699: News
700: Photo Gallery
701: Home
702: Community Forums
703: Community Forums
704: Photo Gallery
705: Community Forums
706: Home
707: Home
708: Community Forums
709: Community Forums
710: Community Forums
711: Community Forums
712: Home
713: Home
714: Home
715: Home
716: Home
717: Community Forums
718: Community Forums
719: Home
720: Home
721: Home
722: Community Forums
723: Community Forums
724: Photo Gallery
725: Home
726: Home
727: Community Forums
728: Home
729: Home
730: Community Forums
731: Community Forums
732: Community Forums
733: Community Forums
734: Home
735: Community Forums
736: Home
737: Home
738: Home
739: Community Forums
740: Home
741: Community Forums
742: Home
743: Home
744: Community Forums
745: Home
746: Photo Gallery
747: Home
748: Community Forums
749: Home
750: Home
751: Home
752: Home
753: Home
754: Home
755: Community Forums
756: Home
757: Home
758: Home
759: Home
760: Community Forums
761: Photo Gallery
762: Community Forums
763: Photo Gallery
764: Home
765: Home
766: Home
767: Community Forums
768: Home
769: Home
770: Home
771: Home
772: Home
773: Home
774: Home
775: Community Forums
776: Home
777: Home
778: Home
779: Home
780: Community Forums
781: Home
782: Home
783: Home
784: Home
785: Home
786: Home
787: Home
788: Home
789: Home
790: Home
791: Home
792: Home
793: Home
794: Home
795: Community Forums
796: Home
797: Home
798: Community Forums
799: Home
800: Home
801: Photo Gallery
802: Community Forums
803: Home
804: Photo Gallery
805: Home
806: Home
807: Home
808: Home
809: Home
810: Community Forums
811: Home
812: Community Forums
813: Home
814: Home
815: Community Forums
816: Photo Gallery
817: Photo Gallery
818: Home
819: Photo Gallery
820: Community Forums
821: Photo Gallery
822: Photo Gallery
823: Community Forums
824: Photo Gallery
825: Community Forums
826: Photo Gallery
827: Community Forums
828: Downloads
829: Member Screenshots
830: Community Forums
831: Community Forums
832: Community Forums
833: Home
834: Community Forums
835: Photo Gallery
836: Photo Gallery
837: Member Screenshots
838: Community Forums
839: Home
840: Statistics
841: Community Forums
842: Home
843: Community Forums
844: Home
845: Home
846: Community Forums
847: Community Forums
848: Community Forums
849: Home
850: Community Forums
851: Statistics
852: Home
853: Community Forums
854: Home
855: Home
856: Community Forums
857: Home
858: Community Forums
859: Community Forums
860: Home
861: Home
862: Community Forums
863: Member Screenshots
864: Home
865: Community Forums
866: Home
867: Home
868: Community Forums
869: Home
870: Home
871: Community Forums
872: Home
873: Member Screenshots
874: Home
875: Home
876: Home
877: Home
878: Home
879: Home
880: Community Forums
881: Home
882: Home
883: Home
884: Community Forums
885: Home
886: Community Forums
887: Photo Gallery
888: Community Forums
889: Home
890: Home
891: Home
892: Home
893: Home
894: Community Forums
895: Home
896: Community Forums
897: Community Forums
898: Home
899: Community Forums
900: Home
901: Home
902: Home
903: Home
904: Home
905: Home
906: Member Screenshots
907: Home
908: Home
909: Home
910: Home
911: Member Screenshots
912: Home
913: Home
914: Home
915: Home
916: Community Forums
917: Community Forums
918: Home
919: Home
920: Home
921: Community Forums
922: Community Forums
923: Community Forums
924: Community Forums
925: Community Forums
926: Home
927: Community Forums
928: Community Forums
929: News
930: Home
931: Tell a Friend
932: Home
933: Home
934: Home
935: Community Forums
936: Community Forums
937: Home
938: Home
939: Community Forums
940: Photo Gallery
941: Community Forums
942: Community Forums
943: Home
944: Community Forums
945: Home
946: Home
947: Home
948: Photo Gallery
949: Community Forums
950: Home
951: Home
952: Home
953: Home
954: Home
955: Home
956: Home
957: Home
958: Home
959: Home
960: Community Forums
961: Home
962: Home
963: Home
964: Home
965: Home
966: Home
967: Community Forums
968: Member Screenshots
969: Community Forums
970: Home
971: Home
972: Home
973: Home
974: Home
975: Home
976: Home
977: Home
978: Home
979: Community Forums
980: Home
981: Home
982: Home
983: Home
984: Community Forums
985: Community Forums
986: Community Forums
987: Community Forums
988: Community Forums
989: Community Forums
990: Community Forums
991: Home
992: Community Forums
993: Community Forums
994: Community Forums
995: Photo Gallery
996: Community Forums
997: Home
998: Home
999: Community Forums
1000: Home
1001: Home
1002: Home
1003: Community Forums
1004: Community Forums
1005: Home
1006: Home
1007: Home
1008: Home
1009: Home
1010: Home
1011: Home
1012: Home
1013: Community Forums
1014: Home
1015: Photo Gallery
1016: Home
1017: Home
1018: Home
1019: Home
1020: Home
1021: Home
1022: Community Forums
1023: Home
1024: Community Forums
1025: Home
1026: Home
1027: Home
1028: Home
1029: Community Forums
1030: Home
1031: Home
1032: Home
1033: Home
1034: Home
1035: Home
1036: Home
1037: Home
1038: Community Forums
1039: Home
1040: Home
1041: Member Screenshots
1042: Home
1043: Home
1044: Community Forums
1045: Home
1046: Home
1047: Home
1048: Home
1049: Home
1050: Home
1051: Community Forums
1052: Community Forums
1053: Home
1054: Community Forums
1055: Home
1056: Member Screenshots
1057: Home
1058: Downloads
1059: Home
1060: Home
1061: Home
1062: Home
1063: Home
1064: Home
1065: Community Forums
1066: Home
1067: Home
1068: Home
1069: Home
1070: Community Forums
1071: Home
1072: Home
1073: Home
1074: Home
1075: Home
1076: Home
1077: Home
1078: Home
1079: Home
1080: Home
1081: Home
1082: Home
1083: Home
1084: Home
1085: Home
1086: Community Forums
1087: Home
1088: Community Forums
1089: Home
1090: Home
1091: Home
1092: Home
1093: Community Forums
1094: Home
1095: Home
1096: Home
1097: Community Forums
1098: Home
1099: Community Forums
1100: Home
1101: Home
1102: Home
1103: Home
1104: Home
1105: Home
1106: Home
1107: Home
1108: Home
1109: Photo Gallery
1110: Home
1111: Home
1112: Home
1113: Home
1114: Home
1115: Home
1116: Community Forums
1117: Home
1118: Home
1119: Home
1120: Home
1121: Home
1122: Home
1123: Home
1124: Home
1125: Home
1126: Community Forums
1127: Community Forums
1128: Community Forums
1129: Home
1130: Home
1131: Home
1132: Home
1133: Home
1134: Home
1135: Home
1136: Home
1137: Home
1138: Home
1139: Home
1140: Home
1141: Photo Gallery
1142: Home
1143: News
1144: Home
1145: Home
1146: Home
1147: Home
1148: Community Forums
1149: Home
1150: Home
1151: Community Forums
1152: Home
1153: Community Forums
1154: Home
1155: Home
1156: Home
1157: Home
1158: Home
1159: Community Forums
1160: Home
1161: Home
1162: Home
1163: Community Forums
1164: Home
1165: Community Forums
1166: Home
1167: Community Forums
1168: Community Forums
1169: Home
1170: Home
1171: Member Screenshots
1172: Member Screenshots
1173: Home
1174: Community Forums
1175: Home
1176: Home
1177: Community Forums
1178: Home
1179: Home
1180: Photo Gallery
1181: Community Forums
1182: Community Forums
1183: Community Forums
1184: Home
1185: Home
1186: Home
1187: Community Forums
1188: Home
1189: Home
1190: Home
1191: Home
1192: Home
1193: Home
1194: Home
1195: Home
1196: Home
1197: Home
1198: Home
1199: Community Forums
1200: Home
1201: Home
1202: Community Forums
1203: Home
1204: Home
1205: Your Account
1206: Community Forums
1207: Photo Gallery
1208: Home
1209: Community Forums
1210: Community Forums
1211: Community Forums
1212: Community Forums
1213: Home
1214: Home
1215: Member Screenshots
1216: Community Forums
1217: Community Forums
1218: Community Forums
1219: Community Forums
1220: Home
1221: Home
1222: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Jinx
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 186
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 3:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- Roy_A_Lingle
The cost of a new tank would possible be far more. There is NO plant, with skilled workers present, that can build new tanks.

You would have to find skilled workers, possible train some of them, check out all the equipment that was placed in storage (that is if any of it was saved), service and repair all of it as needed before restarting production. So less you are planning on building 10,000+ tanks, the restarting process cost would make 7 million per vehicle look cheap.



Thank you for the info. I was not aware that the production facilities had shut down. When the training and tooling-up and plant-building costs are added to the mix, i guess $7,000,000 *does* sound relatively "cheap'.

As for the next generation of fighting vehicles (i am resisting using the word "tank", here, because from what i've heard the resulting product might be something quite different), is this still in the planning phase? Or are there already facilities to build them? (I hate to think what the *new* machines are going to cost.....)
Back to top
View user's profile
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 4:31 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

I wasn't aware that the Lima Tank Plant in Ohio wasn't producing the amount of armor that it once did. Below is what I found out about the plant. It's a little long but pretty well covers the use of the plant, past and present.
Lima Army Tank Plant (LATP)
The Lima Army Tank Plant (LATP) manufactures the M-1 Abrams tank. The Tank Plant is a government-owned, contractor-operated (GOCO) facility, run presently by General Dynamics. The tank plant has produced more than seven-thousand tanks since opening in the early 1980s. The Tank Plant reduced its workforce from a peak of 3,800 to 450 by late 1996. With few new procurements on the horizon, the tracked armored vehicle segment of the industry is in decline. Upgrades to the M1A1 Abrams tank and the M1A2 System Enhancement Package should keep the Lima, Ohio, plant operating through 2005. The Lima facility is also projected to produce 465 Heavy Assault Bridges. These programs require but a fraction of the production capacity available at the facility. Production of a new light-armored military vehicle should increase the work force at the Lima Army Tank Plant by the end of 2001, and employment levels should exceed 600 workers.

The United States Army purchased the property on which the Lima Army Tank Plant sits in 1942 to manufacture weapons. The Army has contracted since then with private businesses to operate a plant to manufacture combat vehicles on the property. In 1982, General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. agreed to manage the plant, commencing in 1983, and, in a separate contract, to manufacture tanks at the plant. General Dynamics does not pay rent for the plant; the Army has granted it a "revocable license to use" the plant and reimburses it for its expenses in managing the plant. General Dynamics receives its profits on the markup for producing the tanks.

As World War II approached, the U.S. Army developed a plan to utilize industrial firms to manufacture armored vehicles. The urgent need for these vehicles was not fully recognized until the Germans’ Blitzkrieg across Europe in 1939 and 1940. This situation presented a staggering mission for the Army Ordnance Department’s new (1941) Tank and Combat Vehicle Division. In one year, over one million vehicles, including 14,000 medium tanks, were to be produced and ready for shipment.

The Lima Army Tank Plant traces its 55-year history back to May 1941, when the Ohio Steel Foundry began building a government-owned plant to manufacture centrifugally-cast gun tubes. The site was chosen for its proximity to a steel mill, five railroads, and national highway routes. Before construction was completed, the Ordnance Department redesignated the site as an intermediate depot for modifying combat vehicles, to include tanks. In November 1942, United Motors Services took over operation of the plant to process vehicles under government contract. The plant prepared many vehicles for Europe, including the M-5 light tank, the T-26 Pershing tank, and a “super secret� amphibious tank intended for use on D-Day. During World War II, the Lima Tank Depot had over 5,000 employees, including many women, and processed over 100,000 combat vehicles for shipment.

Activity slowed during the post-WWII period, and the plant temporarily became a storage facility. In 1948, tanks were dismantled and deprocessed there. Numerous tanks were “canned� and stored in cylindrical gas containers with dehumidifiers. When the Korean War broke out, the depot expanded and industrial operations resumed. Over the next few years, the facility rebuilt combat vehicles and fabricated communication wiring harnesses. The Korean truce led to the depot’s eventual deactivation in March 1959 with little other activity taking place over the next 16 years.

In August 1976, the government selected Lima Army Tank Plant (LATP) as the initial production site for the XM-1 tank, and Chrysler Corporation was awarded the production contract. The method of production differed from previous armor programs; the hull and turret sections were to be fabricated from armored plate, rather than castings, allowing Chrysler to produce a lighter, stronger tank.

Since this was a government-owned, contractor-oper-ated (GOCO) manufacturing facility controlled by the Army’s TankAuto-motive and Armaments Command (TACOM), the installation was expanded and specialized industrial plant equipment purchased. A sister plant was established in Michigan, the Detroit Tank Plant, to assist with the assembly of M1 sections fabricated at Lima.

On February 28, 1980, the first M1 tank rolled out of LATP. It was designated the M1 Abrams, in honor of General Creighton W. Abrams. The name, Thunderbolt, recalled the name Abrams gave to each of his seven tanks in WWII. One of the original XM-1 prototype tanks is permanently on display in front of the Patton Museum of Armor and Cavalry at Ft. Knox.

In 1982, General Dynamics Land Systems (GDLS) bought Chrysler Defense Corporation and began producing the M1 at a rate of 30 tanks a month. By January 1985, the last M1 had rolled off the assembly line, and production began on the improved M1 (IPM1) the following October. The plant later transitioned to manufacture the M1A1, with the first pilot vehicle built in August 1985. By the end of 1986, the plant’s equipment was increased to meet a maximum monthly production capability of 120 M1A1 tanks. At that time GDLS employed over 4,000 workers in Lima with over 100 TACOM personnel monitoring the production and facilities contracts.

In June 1990, all government contract administration services at Lima were placed under the Defense Logistics Agency, Defense Contract Management Command, with TACOM as the procuring activity. During this period, the Marines received over 200 M1A1 tanks, and the first Abrams foreign military sales occurred. The plant supported Desert Storm by sending technical experts to Saudi Arabia for M1A1 fielding to units previously equipped with M1s.

The 1990 DOD base closure plan ordered the Detroit tank plant to reduce its operations, and in August 1991, the Lima Army Tank Plant became the only facility in the U.S. that is a hull/chassis/turret fabricator and final systems integrator of the M1.

The first M1A2 tanks rolled out of LATP in 1992 with upgrade versions produced in 1994.

The installation includes 370 acres and 47 buildings, it’s own railroad network, and two government-owned railroad locomotives. There is also is a 2-mile test track, steam plant, deep water fording pit, 60% and 40% test slopes, and an advanced armor technology facility. The main manufacturing building has over 950,000 square feet of enclosed space, equivalent to approximately 30 football fields. The government owns all of the real property and over 96% of the plant equipment, to include com-puterized machines, robotic welders, plate cutters, large fixtures, and special tooling. General Dynamics is under contract to operate the facility and produce the Abrams with government oversight.

The commander of the Lima plant, a government-owned, contractor-operated facility, is an Army lieutenant colonel. The government and contractor managerial staffs work together monitoring monthly production requirements while maintaining quality control. A partnership environment ensures the highest quality equipment is produced at a fair cost to the government. LATP is operated under the direction of an installation commander who is responsible for the efficient and economical operation, administration, service and supply of all individuals, units, and activities assigned to or under the jurisdiction of LATP. General Dynamics manages the tank plant in which it manufactures tanks. It pays no rent for the plant, and receives reimbursement of its costs in managing the plant. General Dynamics also may manufacture, subject to written approval of the Army, products for others at the plant; in fact, General Dynamics manufactured tanks for the government of Saudi Arabia at the plant. Furthermore, General Dynamics is responsible for security at the plant, securing it according to Army regulations. This security includes counterterrorism, crime prevention, and security of the property.

The Abrams Tank System Program has been using Depleted Uranium (DU) armor on the Abrams Tank since 1988. The DU is fabricated into armor packages by a contractor to the Department of Energy. The contractor ships the assembled armor packages to LATP for installation in the tanks. At LATP, the armor packages remain in the transportation containers until they are ready to be inserted into the tank. Following installation of the armor package and other tank components, the completed tanks are transported to military units as required for field use.

Abrams production originally occurred with over 9,000 Abrams having rolled off the assembly lines of the production facilities, including those produced for domestic and foreign sales.

The M1’s technological and tactical successes in Desert Storm made the tank the envy of the world armor community and generated foreign interest. Both Saudi Arabia and Kuwait now own M1A2 tanks produced at LATP. In a co-production program, M1A1 tank kits (hulls, turrets, components, etc.) are manufactured at LATP and shipped to Egypt for final assembly. Commercially, GDLS also produces “special armor� packages for the South Korean K1 tank.

GDLS is under a multi-year Army contract to upgrade approximately 600 M1/IPM1 tanks to M1A2. The plan is to upgrade 10 tanks a month over a five-year period. The cost of a new M1A2 tank is approximately $4.3 million.

The Army, in conjunction with General Dynamics Land Systems, hosted an acceptance ceremony for the Abrams M1A2 System Enhancement Package (SEP) Tank and the Wolverine Assault Bridge Launcher, 01 September 1999 in Lima, Ohio, at the Lima Army Tank Plant.

The General Dynamics Land Systems Division is the system prime contractor for manufacturing and assembly of the XM104 “Wolverine� - Heavy Assault Bridge. Manufacturing and assembly during the EMD phase of Wolverine elements and components (except the engine/transmission) occurs primarily at GDLS, which uses two facilities: Lima Army Tank Plant (LATP), a government-owned, contractor-operated manufacturing facility located in Lima (Allen County), Ohio; and the GDLS Sterling Heights Complex (SHC), located in Sterling Heights (Macomb County), MI. The mission of LATP is to produce the M1 series Main Battle Tank (MBT). SHC serves as the division headquarters and is their engineering and prototype fabrication facility. The scope of the analysis of potential impacts from manufacturing will be limited to GDLS (LATP), and Anniston Army Depot. The analysis will not include investigation of subcontractors to GDLS and Anniston Army Depot.

Lima, Ohio, is a metropolitan community of 83,000 people situated along I-75, midway between Toledo and Dayton. Sundstrand Corporation, formerly Westinghouse, produced electrical systems for military and commercial aircraft, NASA's space shuttle program, and Abrams battle tanks. Sundstrand/ Westinghouse once employed 3,000, but steady lay-offs resulted in the displacement to only about 400 when it completely closed in June 1996. The Airfoil/Textron Company, a fan-blade maker for jet engines, shut its doors in the fall of 1995, laying off the last 300 workers from a workforce that once numbered 1,800. Since the Lima area's peak defense-related employment, Lima has lost in excess of 8,000 high-wage industrial jobs. The financial loss to the local economy between 1992 and 1996 is estimated at $300 million annually.

BRAC 2005
In its 2005 BRAC Recommendations, DoD would realign Lima Tank Plant, OH. It would retain the portion required to support the manufacturing of armored combat vehicles to include Army Future Combat System (FCS) program, Marine Corps Expeditionary Force Vehicle (EFV) chassis, and M1 Tank recapitalization program. Capacity and capability for armored combat vehicles existed at three sites with little redundancy among the sites. The acquisition strategy for the Army Future Combat System (FCS) and Marine Corps Expeditionary Force Vehicle would include the manufacturing of manned vehicle chassis at Lima Army Tank Plant. The impact of establishing this capability elsewhere would hinder the Department’s ability to meet the USA and USMC future production schedule. This recommendation to retain only the portion of Lima Army Tank Plant required to support the FCS, EFV, and M1 tank recap, would reduce the footprint. This would allow the Department of Defense to remove excess from the Industrial Base, create centers of excellence, avoid single point failure, and generate efficiencies within the manufacture and maintenance of combat vehicles.

The total estimated one-time cost to the Department of Defense to implement this recommendation would be $0.2M. The net of all savings to the Department during the implementation period would be a savings of $5.9M. Annual recurring savings to the Department after implementation would be $1.7M with payback expected immediately. The net present value of the costs and savings to the Department over 20 years would be a savings of $22.3M. This recommendation would not result in any job reductions over the period 2006-2011.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 11:22 am
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

Hi Jeff! Hi Folks!

The plant is more active than I was thinking. Still the area lost a lot of skilled workers.

"The Lima facility is also projected to produce 465 Heavy Assault Bridges"

Say what?

It is my understanding that is one of the programs that the ex-C of S of the Army, Gen. Shineki killed so the funds could be used to buy Strykers.

Anyone else heard if that program has be refunded?

Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 2:57 am
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- Roy_A_Lingle

"The Lima facility is also projected to produce 465 Heavy Assault Bridges"

Say what?

It is my understanding that is one of the programs that the ex-C of S of the Army, Gen. Shineki killed so the funds could be used to buy Strykers.

Anyone else heard if that program has be refunded?


There were a couple of bits in that piece that made me think that it was old info, by about 3-4 years. I believe that early on it mentions 2000 as "next year" or something similar. I've not heard anything to indicate that the bridges have been re-funded.

C

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 8:22 am
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

Hi Folks!

My take on the cost of newer equipment.

I think a large part of the higher cost has more to do with the way a system is being accouted for now days.

Another, I maybe wrong, but I am under the impression that in the passed systems didn't have every possible OVERHEAD expence added into the price of an item.

When you look at wages for people, cost of utilities for the plants, and then tack on every expence that one can get away with, the TOTAL cost of all systems has climbed like a ICBM going up. It is the packing on of OVERHEAD costs. If you could just count the cost of raw materials and the man hours of only the individuals who directly worked on the system, the cost would be a lot lower.

My take of way today's systems cost so much.
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Al_Bowie
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 34

PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:54 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- SFC_Jeff_Button
[img][/img][img][/img]
Seems that the F14 costs to much to repair. An F14 requires 50 hours of maint for each 1 hour of flight, versus 5-10 hours of maint for the F18. Also mentioned was the fact that the F14 was aimed at dogfighting, (as in top-gun fame) but that it is no longer needed since jets now shoot missiles at each other from miles away. .


Whoever wrote that was obviously brought up on Top Gun. The F14 was designed to be a Long Range Fleet interceptor using the extremely advanced (then) Hughes AIM 64 Pheonix Missile system originally designed for the TBX (F111 Naval). It was expected to engage enemy bomber fleets at ranges exceeding 100 mile.
Whilst it did possess dogfighting ability and reintroduced an internal gun to the Navy Fighter its primary role was long range interception and NOT Dog Fighting.
Cheers
Spanner
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 8:50 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

"Whoever wrote that was obviously brought up on Top Gun. The F14 was designed to be a Long Range Fleet interceptor using the extremely advanced (then) Hughes AIM 64 Pheonix Missile system originally designed for the TBX (F111 Naval). It was expected to engage enemy bomber fleets at ranges exceeding 100 mile.
Whilst it did possess dogfighting ability and reintroduced an internal gun to the Navy Fighter its primary role was long range interception and NOT Dog Fighting.
Cheers
Spanner"

Spanner - If you look a couple messages below thatone you'll find my defense of the last true dog-fighter the F-15. As an old 'Eagle Keeper' I couldn't do anything else Smile

Oh and the F-11 was the TFX (although calling it a fighter is a whole lot less accurate than calling the F-14 a dog fighter :-))

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
David_Reasoner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 127
Location: South Central Kentucky
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 2:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- bsmart

Oh and the F-11 was the TFX (although calling it a fighter is a whole lot less accurate than calling the F-14 a dog fighter :-))


Bob, I assume you're referring to the proposed F-111B, rather than the Grumman F-11 Tiger Laughing The old F-11 (of one-time Blue Angels fame) certainly WAS a dogfighter.

David
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

You got it. finger didn't hit enough 1s and I didn't catch it before it went (Actually I had to leave for a meeting as I sent it so didn't see it until now Sad

I remember when the Blue Angels went from teh F-11 to the F-4. The Air Force Thunderbirds went from the F-100 to the F-4 at about the same time. Both switched to other aircraft very soon. The F-4 for all it's good qualities was not meant to be a tight turning show bird!!

Quick Quiz - Does anyone know the other time the Thunderbirds changed out of a new plane much sooner than expected?

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:49 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- bsmart
"Whoever wrote that was obviously brought up on Top Gun. The F14 was designed to be a Long Range Fleet interceptor using the extremely advanced (then) Hughes AIM 64 Pheonix Missile system originally designed for the TBX (F111 Naval). It was expected to engage enemy bomber fleets at ranges exceeding 100 mile.
Whilst it did possess dogfighting ability and reintroduced an internal gun to the Navy Fighter its primary role was long range interception and NOT Dog Fighting.
Cheers
Spanner"


Oh and the F-111 was the TFX (although calling it a fighter is a whole lot less accurate than calling the F-14 a dog fighter :-))


..a mission which the F111 could have performed....at long range. There was an interesting episode during which the Navy COS or SecNav and Thomas Moorer (then CNO) were being grilled on why there was resistance from Naval aviators about accepting the F111 (marinized) as it's principle fighter in harmony with the Air Force...Moorers' boss being a "yes" man and saying "sure we can...it just needs more thrust to overcome it's mass".
The SecDef (I believe) noted Moorers' qualifications and skeptical look and asked him, in front of his boss, whether he thought more thrust would make the F111 (TFX) platform a fighter acceptable to the Navy. He replied (at some risk to his career) "Sir, in my opinion, all the thrust in Christendom would not make a fighter out of the F111."

It was virtually a dead issue after that....
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
David_Reasoner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 127
Location: South Central Kentucky
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:58 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- bsmart
I remember when the Blue Angels went from teh F-11 to the F-4. The Air Force Thunderbirds went from the F-100 to the F-4 at about the same time. Both switched to other aircraft very soon. The F-4 for all it's good qualities was not meant to be a tight turning show bird!!

Quick Quiz - Does anyone know the other time the Thunderbirds changed out of a new plane much sooner than expected?


Hence my earlier remark about the F-4 and it's Rhino moniker. The "official" reason for the switch from F-4E to T-38A for the T-birds was fuel cost savings. About this time the Blue Angels went from F-4 to A-4 for similar reasons. I have no idea on the answer to your quiz.

David
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:03 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- bsmart
Quick Quiz - Does anyone know the other time the Thunderbirds changed out of a new plane much sooner than expected?


F1015B T'Chief? Transitioned back to the F100 mighty quick....
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
David_Reasoner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 127
Location: South Central Kentucky
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:16 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- Doug_Kibbey
- bsmart
Quick Quiz - Does anyone know the other time the Thunderbirds changed out of a new plane much sooner than expected?


F1015B T'Chief? Transitioned back to the F100 mighty quick....


I wasn't aware they had gone back to the F-100 after the F-105 (before my time...), but if so that is probably what Bob was referring to. The "Thud" wasn't much on close-in dogfighting, either. Although it did bag it's share of MiG's during the early years of the air war in Vietnam.

David
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:25 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- Doug_Kibbey
- bsmart
Quick Quiz - Does anyone know the other time the Thunderbirds changed out of a new plane much sooner than expected?


F1015B T'Chief? Transitioned back to the F100 mighty quick....
You got it! It appears there were about 6 shows with the F105B when it was decided (after a fatal accident) thet the birds needed extensive modifications. Instead they went to the F-100D (They had used the F-100C before)

I was looking at the Thunderbird web site and it says they used the F-4 for sevral years and transitioned out of it because of the 'Energy Crisis' in the Early 70s. The entire group of T-38s used less fuell than one F-4!

A pilot I knew later on F-15s flew with the T-birds in the F-4 era and told a slightly different story. Although he loved the Phantom no one liked it in the type of flying the Tbirds did. Some of the Tbirds wanted to go to the F-5 but the powers that be didn't want to use a 'second rate fighter' The energy crisis gave them the excuse to go to the lighter airframe but the same powers that be wouldn't step up to the more poerful F-5E/F version that was just becoming available. So they were left with 'standard' T-38s

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:27 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

My Google-fu is strong, Master...

"Almost a footnote in the history of Thunderbird aviation, the Republic-built F-105B Thunderchief performed only six shows between April 26 and May 9, 1964. Extensive modifications to the F-105 were necessary, and rather than cancel the rest of the show season to accomplish this, the Thunderbirds quickly transitioned back to the Super Sabre. While the switch back to the F-100D was supposed to be temporary, the F-105 never returned to the Thunderbird hangar. The F-100 ended up staying with the team for nearly 13 years."

www.aviationheritagemu...rbirds.htm


BTW, there is (or was) an F-11 Tiger in Blue Angels colors in the aviation museum outside Topeka, I think it is...indoor...very nice.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 2 of 3
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum