±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 957
Total: 957
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Member Screenshots
03: Photo Gallery
04: Member Screenshots
05: Home
06: Member Screenshots
07: Member Screenshots
08: Photo Gallery
09: Your Account
10: Member Screenshots
11: Downloads
12: Member Screenshots
13: Photo Gallery
14: Photo Gallery
15: Community Forums
16: Member Screenshots
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: News Archive
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Photo Gallery
23: Downloads
24: News
25: Home
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Member Screenshots
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Home
34: Community Forums
35: Photo Gallery
36: Photo Gallery
37: Member Screenshots
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Photo Gallery
41: Member Screenshots
42: News
43: Home
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Photo Gallery
47: Downloads
48: News Archive
49: News
50: Member Screenshots
51: Community Forums
52: Member Screenshots
53: Your Account
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Photo Gallery
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: News Archive
60: Home
61: Photo Gallery
62: Community Forums
63: Home
64: Photo Gallery
65: Community Forums
66: Community Forums
67: Member Screenshots
68: Community Forums
69: News Archive
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Home
78: Community Forums
79: News Archive
80: Community Forums
81: News Archive
82: Community Forums
83: Member Screenshots
84: Community Forums
85: News
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: News Archive
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Member Screenshots
96: Community Forums
97: Photo Gallery
98: Member Screenshots
99: Community Forums
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: Member Screenshots
103: Member Screenshots
104: Community Forums
105: Member Screenshots
106: Member Screenshots
107: Downloads
108: Community Forums
109: Photo Gallery
110: Community Forums
111: Downloads
112: Member Screenshots
113: Community Forums
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Photo Gallery
117: Community Forums
118: Home
119: Home
120: Downloads
121: Community Forums
122: Home
123: Community Forums
124: Member Screenshots
125: News Archive
126: News Archive
127: Photo Gallery
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Home
131: Home
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Home
136: News Archive
137: Photo Gallery
138: Member Screenshots
139: Downloads
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Member Screenshots
146: Home
147: Home
148: Home
149: Community Forums
150: News Archive
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Member Screenshots
156: Member Screenshots
157: Community Forums
158: Photo Gallery
159: Home
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Photo Gallery
163: Community Forums
164: Member Screenshots
165: Community Forums
166: Photo Gallery
167: News Archive
168: Home
169: Downloads
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Member Screenshots
173: News Archive
174: News Archive
175: Community Forums
176: Member Screenshots
177: Downloads
178: Community Forums
179: Downloads
180: Home
181: Community Forums
182: Photo Gallery
183: Home
184: Community Forums
185: Photo Gallery
186: Home
187: Member Screenshots
188: Home
189: Member Screenshots
190: Community Forums
191: Home
192: Community Forums
193: Home
194: Community Forums
195: Home
196: Member Screenshots
197: Downloads
198: Downloads
199: Photo Gallery
200: Downloads
201: Member Screenshots
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums
204: Photo Gallery
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Photo Gallery
208: Member Screenshots
209: Member Screenshots
210: Photo Gallery
211: News Archive
212: Community Forums
213: Downloads
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Home
217: Community Forums
218: Photo Gallery
219: News Archive
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Your Account
223: Member Screenshots
224: Community Forums
225: Member Screenshots
226: Community Forums
227: Downloads
228: Member Screenshots
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: News Archive
232: News Archive
233: Downloads
234: Community Forums
235: Member Screenshots
236: Downloads
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Home
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: News
244: Member Screenshots
245: Statistics
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Member Screenshots
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Member Screenshots
252: Your Account
253: Member Screenshots
254: Home
255: Community Forums
256: Member Screenshots
257: Community Forums
258: Photo Gallery
259: Community Forums
260: Photo Gallery
261: Photo Gallery
262: Member Screenshots
263: Photo Gallery
264: Community Forums
265: News Archive
266: Home
267: News Archive
268: News Archive
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Photo Gallery
272: Community Forums
273: Member Screenshots
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Member Screenshots
277: Community Forums
278: Statistics
279: Community Forums
280: Member Screenshots
281: Community Forums
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Photo Gallery
285: Member Screenshots
286: Community Forums
287: Member Screenshots
288: Home
289: Your Account
290: News Archive
291: Community Forums
292: Member Screenshots
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Member Screenshots
296: Photo Gallery
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Home
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Community Forums
303: Home
304: Community Forums
305: Member Screenshots
306: Photo Gallery
307: Photo Gallery
308: Downloads
309: Community Forums
310: Home
311: Community Forums
312: Home
313: Community Forums
314: News Archive
315: Community Forums
316: Downloads
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Home
324: News Archive
325: Community Forums
326: Community Forums
327: Community Forums
328: Member Screenshots
329: Member Screenshots
330: News Archive
331: Community Forums
332: Community Forums
333: Photo Gallery
334: Community Forums
335: Member Screenshots
336: Downloads
337: Community Forums
338: News Archive
339: Community Forums
340: Member Screenshots
341: LinkToUs
342: Member Screenshots
343: Photo Gallery
344: Community Forums
345: Community Forums
346: Community Forums
347: Member Screenshots
348: Community Forums
349: Home
350: Photo Gallery
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Community Forums
354: Community Forums
355: Community Forums
356: Photo Gallery
357: News Archive
358: Community Forums
359: Community Forums
360: Community Forums
361: Photo Gallery
362: Member Screenshots
363: Community Forums
364: Downloads
365: Community Forums
366: Home
367: Community Forums
368: Home
369: Community Forums
370: Member Screenshots
371: Community Forums
372: Community Forums
373: Photo Gallery
374: Photo Gallery
375: Downloads
376: Photo Gallery
377: Home
378: Member Screenshots
379: Community Forums
380: News Archive
381: Community Forums
382: News Archive
383: Member Screenshots
384: Member Screenshots
385: Downloads
386: Member Screenshots
387: Community Forums
388: Community Forums
389: Community Forums
390: Member Screenshots
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: Community Forums
394: Community Forums
395: Community Forums
396: Community Forums
397: Home
398: Community Forums
399: Community Forums
400: Downloads
401: Home
402: Community Forums
403: Community Forums
404: Member Screenshots
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Community Forums
408: Photo Gallery
409: Member Screenshots
410: News Archive
411: Downloads
412: Photo Gallery
413: Community Forums
414: Community Forums
415: Home
416: Community Forums
417: Community Forums
418: Downloads
419: Community Forums
420: Photo Gallery
421: Home
422: Community Forums
423: Downloads
424: Community Forums
425: Downloads
426: Community Forums
427: Member Screenshots
428: Community Forums
429: Community Forums
430: Community Forums
431: Community Forums
432: Photo Gallery
433: Community Forums
434: Community Forums
435: Community Forums
436: Community Forums
437: Downloads
438: Community Forums
439: Community Forums
440: Community Forums
441: Community Forums
442: Community Forums
443: Community Forums
444: Community Forums
445: Home
446: Home
447: Community Forums
448: Photo Gallery
449: Community Forums
450: Member Screenshots
451: News Archive
452: Community Forums
453: Photo Gallery
454: Community Forums
455: Member Screenshots
456: Home
457: Home
458: Community Forums
459: Member Screenshots
460: Downloads
461: Member Screenshots
462: Community Forums
463: Community Forums
464: Downloads
465: Community Forums
466: Home
467: Community Forums
468: Community Forums
469: Home
470: Member Screenshots
471: Community Forums
472: News Archive
473: Community Forums
474: Downloads
475: Community Forums
476: News Archive
477: Member Screenshots
478: Community Forums
479: Downloads
480: News Archive
481: Home
482: News Archive
483: News Archive
484: Photo Gallery
485: Community Forums
486: Home
487: Community Forums
488: Member Screenshots
489: Downloads
490: Photo Gallery
491: Member Screenshots
492: Member Screenshots
493: Member Screenshots
494: Community Forums
495: Home
496: Downloads
497: Home
498: Member Screenshots
499: Community Forums
500: Photo Gallery
501: Community Forums
502: Community Forums
503: Community Forums
504: Community Forums
505: Home
506: Downloads
507: Member Screenshots
508: Member Screenshots
509: Photo Gallery
510: Photo Gallery
511: Community Forums
512: Community Forums
513: Community Forums
514: News Archive
515: Photo Gallery
516: Home
517: Home
518: Photo Gallery
519: Community Forums
520: News Archive
521: Your Account
522: Community Forums
523: Downloads
524: Photo Gallery
525: Community Forums
526: Community Forums
527: Community Forums
528: Photo Gallery
529: Community Forums
530: Community Forums
531: Community Forums
532: Home
533: News Archive
534: Home
535: Community Forums
536: Home
537: Community Forums
538: Community Forums
539: Community Forums
540: Community Forums
541: Photo Gallery
542: Downloads
543: Community Forums
544: Home
545: Statistics
546: Community Forums
547: Member Screenshots
548: Photo Gallery
549: Home
550: Home
551: Community Forums
552: Photo Gallery
553: News Archive
554: Photo Gallery
555: Community Forums
556: Community Forums
557: Community Forums
558: Member Screenshots
559: Photo Gallery
560: Downloads
561: Home
562: Community Forums
563: Home
564: Community Forums
565: Home
566: Home
567: Community Forums
568: Member Screenshots
569: Home
570: Community Forums
571: Home
572: Home
573: Community Forums
574: Community Forums
575: Home
576: Community Forums
577: Community Forums
578: Community Forums
579: Home
580: Home
581: Downloads
582: Community Forums
583: Member Screenshots
584: Community Forums
585: Downloads
586: News Archive
587: Home
588: Community Forums
589: Community Forums
590: Community Forums
591: Member Screenshots
592: News Archive
593: Community Forums
594: News Archive
595: Community Forums
596: Downloads
597: Community Forums
598: Home
599: Photo Gallery
600: Community Forums
601: News Archive
602: Home
603: Home
604: Home
605: Home
606: Member Screenshots
607: Downloads
608: Member Screenshots
609: Home
610: Home
611: Supporters
612: Downloads
613: Community Forums
614: Community Forums
615: Community Forums
616: News Archive
617: Community Forums
618: Home
619: Community Forums
620: Community Forums
621: Member Screenshots
622: Downloads
623: News Archive
624: Home
625: Community Forums
626: Community Forums
627: Community Forums
628: Community Forums
629: Community Forums
630: Home
631: Community Forums
632: Community Forums
633: Community Forums
634: Downloads
635: Photo Gallery
636: Home
637: Community Forums
638: Community Forums
639: Member Screenshots
640: News Archive
641: Community Forums
642: Photo Gallery
643: Community Forums
644: Photo Gallery
645: Photo Gallery
646: Member Screenshots
647: Member Screenshots
648: Member Screenshots
649: Member Screenshots
650: News Archive
651: Community Forums
652: Downloads
653: Community Forums
654: Community Forums
655: News Archive
656: Member Screenshots
657: Member Screenshots
658: Photo Gallery
659: Downloads
660: News Archive
661: Your Account
662: Community Forums
663: Community Forums
664: Member Screenshots
665: Community Forums
666: Member Screenshots
667: Downloads
668: News Archive
669: Community Forums
670: Community Forums
671: Photo Gallery
672: Member Screenshots
673: Member Screenshots
674: Home
675: Downloads
676: News Archive
677: Community Forums
678: Home
679: Community Forums
680: Member Screenshots
681: Member Screenshots
682: Member Screenshots
683: Community Forums
684: Downloads
685: Community Forums
686: Community Forums
687: Member Screenshots
688: Member Screenshots
689: Downloads
690: News Archive
691: Photo Gallery
692: Home
693: Home
694: Statistics
695: Member Screenshots
696: Community Forums
697: Community Forums
698: Home
699: Community Forums
700: Photo Gallery
701: Home
702: Home
703: Community Forums
704: Member Screenshots
705: Community Forums
706: Community Forums
707: News Archive
708: Member Screenshots
709: Community Forums
710: Member Screenshots
711: Community Forums
712: Community Forums
713: Community Forums
714: Community Forums
715: Community Forums
716: Community Forums
717: Downloads
718: Photo Gallery
719: Photo Gallery
720: Community Forums
721: Community Forums
722: Community Forums
723: Community Forums
724: News Archive
725: Community Forums
726: Community Forums
727: LinkToUs
728: Community Forums
729: Photo Gallery
730: Community Forums
731: Photo Gallery
732: Community Forums
733: Community Forums
734: Photo Gallery
735: Community Forums
736: Community Forums
737: News Archive
738: Photo Gallery
739: Community Forums
740: Community Forums
741: Member Screenshots
742: Community Forums
743: Member Screenshots
744: Downloads
745: Community Forums
746: Community Forums
747: Community Forums
748: Member Screenshots
749: Community Forums
750: Downloads
751: Community Forums
752: Community Forums
753: Community Forums
754: Community Forums
755: Downloads
756: Community Forums
757: Statistics
758: Home
759: Photo Gallery
760: Community Forums
761: Community Forums
762: Downloads
763: Community Forums
764: Downloads
765: Photo Gallery
766: Home
767: Community Forums
768: News Archive
769: Home
770: Member Screenshots
771: Community Forums
772: News Archive
773: Community Forums
774: Community Forums
775: Community Forums
776: Community Forums
777: Community Forums
778: Home
779: Home
780: News Archive
781: Community Forums
782: Downloads
783: Home
784: Community Forums
785: Photo Gallery
786: Community Forums
787: Community Forums
788: Downloads
789: Community Forums
790: Downloads
791: Community Forums
792: Community Forums
793: Member Screenshots
794: Photo Gallery
795: Member Screenshots
796: News Archive
797: Community Forums
798: Community Forums
799: Downloads
800: Community Forums
801: Community Forums
802: Home
803: Member Screenshots
804: Statistics
805: Community Forums
806: Downloads
807: Statistics
808: Photo Gallery
809: Downloads
810: Community Forums
811: Community Forums
812: Community Forums
813: Community Forums
814: Community Forums
815: Member Screenshots
816: News Archive
817: News Archive
818: Community Forums
819: Member Screenshots
820: Community Forums
821: Member Screenshots
822: Community Forums
823: Home
824: Community Forums
825: Community Forums
826: Community Forums
827: Community Forums
828: Community Forums
829: Home
830: Community Forums
831: News Archive
832: News Archive
833: Statistics
834: Home
835: Home
836: Community Forums
837: Home
838: Community Forums
839: Community Forums
840: News Archive
841: Downloads
842: Community Forums
843: News Archive
844: Home
845: Community Forums
846: Member Screenshots
847: Community Forums
848: Member Screenshots
849: News Archive
850: Downloads
851: Community Forums
852: Community Forums
853: Community Forums
854: Photo Gallery
855: Downloads
856: Downloads
857: Community Forums
858: News Archive
859: Member Screenshots
860: Member Screenshots
861: Member Screenshots
862: Community Forums
863: Home
864: Photo Gallery
865: Home
866: Home
867: Community Forums
868: Member Screenshots
869: Home
870: Community Forums
871: Downloads
872: Photo Gallery
873: Member Screenshots
874: Community Forums
875: Community Forums
876: Community Forums
877: Community Forums
878: Home
879: Photo Gallery
880: Community Forums
881: Community Forums
882: Community Forums
883: Home
884: Member Screenshots
885: Community Forums
886: Home
887: Community Forums
888: Statistics
889: Community Forums
890: Home
891: Community Forums
892: Home
893: Community Forums
894: Home
895: Community Forums
896: Member Screenshots
897: News Archive
898: Photo Gallery
899: Tell a Friend
900: Photo Gallery
901: Photo Gallery
902: Downloads
903: Downloads
904: Community Forums
905: Photo Gallery
906: News Archive
907: Member Screenshots
908: Member Screenshots
909: Community Forums
910: Home
911: Home
912: Community Forums
913: Community Forums
914: Community Forums
915: Photo Gallery
916: Home
917: Member Screenshots
918: Community Forums
919: News Archive
920: Statistics
921: Home
922: Home
923: Community Forums
924: Downloads
925: Community Forums
926: Statistics
927: Statistics
928: Photo Gallery
929: Community Forums
930: Downloads
931: Home
932: Community Forums
933: Home
934: News Archive
935: Community Forums
936: Member Screenshots
937: Photo Gallery
938: Community Forums
939: Member Screenshots
940: Community Forums
941: Home
942: Community Forums
943: Community Forums
944: News Archive
945: Community Forums
946: News Archive
947: Community Forums
948: Community Forums
949: Community Forums
950: Community Forums
951: Community Forums
952: Community Forums
953: Home
954: Community Forums
955: Community Forums
956: Downloads
957: Photo Gallery

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Jinx
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 186
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 3:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- Roy_A_Lingle
The cost of a new tank would possible be far more. There is NO plant, with skilled workers present, that can build new tanks.

You would have to find skilled workers, possible train some of them, check out all the equipment that was placed in storage (that is if any of it was saved), service and repair all of it as needed before restarting production. So less you are planning on building 10,000+ tanks, the restarting process cost would make 7 million per vehicle look cheap.



Thank you for the info. I was not aware that the production facilities had shut down. When the training and tooling-up and plant-building costs are added to the mix, i guess $7,000,000 *does* sound relatively "cheap'.

As for the next generation of fighting vehicles (i am resisting using the word "tank", here, because from what i've heard the resulting product might be something quite different), is this still in the planning phase? Or are there already facilities to build them? (I hate to think what the *new* machines are going to cost.....)
Back to top
View user's profile
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 4:31 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

I wasn't aware that the Lima Tank Plant in Ohio wasn't producing the amount of armor that it once did. Below is what I found out about the plant. It's a little long but pretty well covers the use of the plant, past and present.
Lima Army Tank Plant (LATP)
The Lima Army Tank Plant (LATP) manufactures the M-1 Abrams tank. The Tank Plant is a government-owned, contractor-operated (GOCO) facility, run presently by General Dynamics. The tank plant has produced more than seven-thousand tanks since opening in the early 1980s. The Tank Plant reduced its workforce from a peak of 3,800 to 450 by late 1996. With few new procurements on the horizon, the tracked armored vehicle segment of the industry is in decline. Upgrades to the M1A1 Abrams tank and the M1A2 System Enhancement Package should keep the Lima, Ohio, plant operating through 2005. The Lima facility is also projected to produce 465 Heavy Assault Bridges. These programs require but a fraction of the production capacity available at the facility. Production of a new light-armored military vehicle should increase the work force at the Lima Army Tank Plant by the end of 2001, and employment levels should exceed 600 workers.

The United States Army purchased the property on which the Lima Army Tank Plant sits in 1942 to manufacture weapons. The Army has contracted since then with private businesses to operate a plant to manufacture combat vehicles on the property. In 1982, General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. agreed to manage the plant, commencing in 1983, and, in a separate contract, to manufacture tanks at the plant. General Dynamics does not pay rent for the plant; the Army has granted it a "revocable license to use" the plant and reimburses it for its expenses in managing the plant. General Dynamics receives its profits on the markup for producing the tanks.

As World War II approached, the U.S. Army developed a plan to utilize industrial firms to manufacture armored vehicles. The urgent need for these vehicles was not fully recognized until the Germans’ Blitzkrieg across Europe in 1939 and 1940. This situation presented a staggering mission for the Army Ordnance Department’s new (1941) Tank and Combat Vehicle Division. In one year, over one million vehicles, including 14,000 medium tanks, were to be produced and ready for shipment.

The Lima Army Tank Plant traces its 55-year history back to May 1941, when the Ohio Steel Foundry began building a government-owned plant to manufacture centrifugally-cast gun tubes. The site was chosen for its proximity to a steel mill, five railroads, and national highway routes. Before construction was completed, the Ordnance Department redesignated the site as an intermediate depot for modifying combat vehicles, to include tanks. In November 1942, United Motors Services took over operation of the plant to process vehicles under government contract. The plant prepared many vehicles for Europe, including the M-5 light tank, the T-26 Pershing tank, and a “super secret� amphibious tank intended for use on D-Day. During World War II, the Lima Tank Depot had over 5,000 employees, including many women, and processed over 100,000 combat vehicles for shipment.

Activity slowed during the post-WWII period, and the plant temporarily became a storage facility. In 1948, tanks were dismantled and deprocessed there. Numerous tanks were “canned� and stored in cylindrical gas containers with dehumidifiers. When the Korean War broke out, the depot expanded and industrial operations resumed. Over the next few years, the facility rebuilt combat vehicles and fabricated communication wiring harnesses. The Korean truce led to the depot’s eventual deactivation in March 1959 with little other activity taking place over the next 16 years.

In August 1976, the government selected Lima Army Tank Plant (LATP) as the initial production site for the XM-1 tank, and Chrysler Corporation was awarded the production contract. The method of production differed from previous armor programs; the hull and turret sections were to be fabricated from armored plate, rather than castings, allowing Chrysler to produce a lighter, stronger tank.

Since this was a government-owned, contractor-oper-ated (GOCO) manufacturing facility controlled by the Army’s TankAuto-motive and Armaments Command (TACOM), the installation was expanded and specialized industrial plant equipment purchased. A sister plant was established in Michigan, the Detroit Tank Plant, to assist with the assembly of M1 sections fabricated at Lima.

On February 28, 1980, the first M1 tank rolled out of LATP. It was designated the M1 Abrams, in honor of General Creighton W. Abrams. The name, Thunderbolt, recalled the name Abrams gave to each of his seven tanks in WWII. One of the original XM-1 prototype tanks is permanently on display in front of the Patton Museum of Armor and Cavalry at Ft. Knox.

In 1982, General Dynamics Land Systems (GDLS) bought Chrysler Defense Corporation and began producing the M1 at a rate of 30 tanks a month. By January 1985, the last M1 had rolled off the assembly line, and production began on the improved M1 (IPM1) the following October. The plant later transitioned to manufacture the M1A1, with the first pilot vehicle built in August 1985. By the end of 1986, the plant’s equipment was increased to meet a maximum monthly production capability of 120 M1A1 tanks. At that time GDLS employed over 4,000 workers in Lima with over 100 TACOM personnel monitoring the production and facilities contracts.

In June 1990, all government contract administration services at Lima were placed under the Defense Logistics Agency, Defense Contract Management Command, with TACOM as the procuring activity. During this period, the Marines received over 200 M1A1 tanks, and the first Abrams foreign military sales occurred. The plant supported Desert Storm by sending technical experts to Saudi Arabia for M1A1 fielding to units previously equipped with M1s.

The 1990 DOD base closure plan ordered the Detroit tank plant to reduce its operations, and in August 1991, the Lima Army Tank Plant became the only facility in the U.S. that is a hull/chassis/turret fabricator and final systems integrator of the M1.

The first M1A2 tanks rolled out of LATP in 1992 with upgrade versions produced in 1994.

The installation includes 370 acres and 47 buildings, it’s own railroad network, and two government-owned railroad locomotives. There is also is a 2-mile test track, steam plant, deep water fording pit, 60% and 40% test slopes, and an advanced armor technology facility. The main manufacturing building has over 950,000 square feet of enclosed space, equivalent to approximately 30 football fields. The government owns all of the real property and over 96% of the plant equipment, to include com-puterized machines, robotic welders, plate cutters, large fixtures, and special tooling. General Dynamics is under contract to operate the facility and produce the Abrams with government oversight.

The commander of the Lima plant, a government-owned, contractor-operated facility, is an Army lieutenant colonel. The government and contractor managerial staffs work together monitoring monthly production requirements while maintaining quality control. A partnership environment ensures the highest quality equipment is produced at a fair cost to the government. LATP is operated under the direction of an installation commander who is responsible for the efficient and economical operation, administration, service and supply of all individuals, units, and activities assigned to or under the jurisdiction of LATP. General Dynamics manages the tank plant in which it manufactures tanks. It pays no rent for the plant, and receives reimbursement of its costs in managing the plant. General Dynamics also may manufacture, subject to written approval of the Army, products for others at the plant; in fact, General Dynamics manufactured tanks for the government of Saudi Arabia at the plant. Furthermore, General Dynamics is responsible for security at the plant, securing it according to Army regulations. This security includes counterterrorism, crime prevention, and security of the property.

The Abrams Tank System Program has been using Depleted Uranium (DU) armor on the Abrams Tank since 1988. The DU is fabricated into armor packages by a contractor to the Department of Energy. The contractor ships the assembled armor packages to LATP for installation in the tanks. At LATP, the armor packages remain in the transportation containers until they are ready to be inserted into the tank. Following installation of the armor package and other tank components, the completed tanks are transported to military units as required for field use.

Abrams production originally occurred with over 9,000 Abrams having rolled off the assembly lines of the production facilities, including those produced for domestic and foreign sales.

The M1’s technological and tactical successes in Desert Storm made the tank the envy of the world armor community and generated foreign interest. Both Saudi Arabia and Kuwait now own M1A2 tanks produced at LATP. In a co-production program, M1A1 tank kits (hulls, turrets, components, etc.) are manufactured at LATP and shipped to Egypt for final assembly. Commercially, GDLS also produces “special armor� packages for the South Korean K1 tank.

GDLS is under a multi-year Army contract to upgrade approximately 600 M1/IPM1 tanks to M1A2. The plan is to upgrade 10 tanks a month over a five-year period. The cost of a new M1A2 tank is approximately $4.3 million.

The Army, in conjunction with General Dynamics Land Systems, hosted an acceptance ceremony for the Abrams M1A2 System Enhancement Package (SEP) Tank and the Wolverine Assault Bridge Launcher, 01 September 1999 in Lima, Ohio, at the Lima Army Tank Plant.

The General Dynamics Land Systems Division is the system prime contractor for manufacturing and assembly of the XM104 “Wolverine� - Heavy Assault Bridge. Manufacturing and assembly during the EMD phase of Wolverine elements and components (except the engine/transmission) occurs primarily at GDLS, which uses two facilities: Lima Army Tank Plant (LATP), a government-owned, contractor-operated manufacturing facility located in Lima (Allen County), Ohio; and the GDLS Sterling Heights Complex (SHC), located in Sterling Heights (Macomb County), MI. The mission of LATP is to produce the M1 series Main Battle Tank (MBT). SHC serves as the division headquarters and is their engineering and prototype fabrication facility. The scope of the analysis of potential impacts from manufacturing will be limited to GDLS (LATP), and Anniston Army Depot. The analysis will not include investigation of subcontractors to GDLS and Anniston Army Depot.

Lima, Ohio, is a metropolitan community of 83,000 people situated along I-75, midway between Toledo and Dayton. Sundstrand Corporation, formerly Westinghouse, produced electrical systems for military and commercial aircraft, NASA's space shuttle program, and Abrams battle tanks. Sundstrand/ Westinghouse once employed 3,000, but steady lay-offs resulted in the displacement to only about 400 when it completely closed in June 1996. The Airfoil/Textron Company, a fan-blade maker for jet engines, shut its doors in the fall of 1995, laying off the last 300 workers from a workforce that once numbered 1,800. Since the Lima area's peak defense-related employment, Lima has lost in excess of 8,000 high-wage industrial jobs. The financial loss to the local economy between 1992 and 1996 is estimated at $300 million annually.

BRAC 2005
In its 2005 BRAC Recommendations, DoD would realign Lima Tank Plant, OH. It would retain the portion required to support the manufacturing of armored combat vehicles to include Army Future Combat System (FCS) program, Marine Corps Expeditionary Force Vehicle (EFV) chassis, and M1 Tank recapitalization program. Capacity and capability for armored combat vehicles existed at three sites with little redundancy among the sites. The acquisition strategy for the Army Future Combat System (FCS) and Marine Corps Expeditionary Force Vehicle would include the manufacturing of manned vehicle chassis at Lima Army Tank Plant. The impact of establishing this capability elsewhere would hinder the Department’s ability to meet the USA and USMC future production schedule. This recommendation to retain only the portion of Lima Army Tank Plant required to support the FCS, EFV, and M1 tank recap, would reduce the footprint. This would allow the Department of Defense to remove excess from the Industrial Base, create centers of excellence, avoid single point failure, and generate efficiencies within the manufacture and maintenance of combat vehicles.

The total estimated one-time cost to the Department of Defense to implement this recommendation would be $0.2M. The net of all savings to the Department during the implementation period would be a savings of $5.9M. Annual recurring savings to the Department after implementation would be $1.7M with payback expected immediately. The net present value of the costs and savings to the Department over 20 years would be a savings of $22.3M. This recommendation would not result in any job reductions over the period 2006-2011.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 11:22 am
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

Hi Jeff! Hi Folks!

The plant is more active than I was thinking. Still the area lost a lot of skilled workers.

"The Lima facility is also projected to produce 465 Heavy Assault Bridges"

Say what?

It is my understanding that is one of the programs that the ex-C of S of the Army, Gen. Shineki killed so the funds could be used to buy Strykers.

Anyone else heard if that program has be refunded?

Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 2:57 am
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- Roy_A_Lingle

"The Lima facility is also projected to produce 465 Heavy Assault Bridges"

Say what?

It is my understanding that is one of the programs that the ex-C of S of the Army, Gen. Shineki killed so the funds could be used to buy Strykers.

Anyone else heard if that program has be refunded?


There were a couple of bits in that piece that made me think that it was old info, by about 3-4 years. I believe that early on it mentions 2000 as "next year" or something similar. I've not heard anything to indicate that the bridges have been re-funded.

C

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 8:22 am
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

Hi Folks!

My take on the cost of newer equipment.

I think a large part of the higher cost has more to do with the way a system is being accouted for now days.

Another, I maybe wrong, but I am under the impression that in the passed systems didn't have every possible OVERHEAD expence added into the price of an item.

When you look at wages for people, cost of utilities for the plants, and then tack on every expence that one can get away with, the TOTAL cost of all systems has climbed like a ICBM going up. It is the packing on of OVERHEAD costs. If you could just count the cost of raw materials and the man hours of only the individuals who directly worked on the system, the cost would be a lot lower.

My take of way today's systems cost so much.
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Al_Bowie
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 34

PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:54 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- SFC_Jeff_Button
[img][/img][img][/img]
Seems that the F14 costs to much to repair. An F14 requires 50 hours of maint for each 1 hour of flight, versus 5-10 hours of maint for the F18. Also mentioned was the fact that the F14 was aimed at dogfighting, (as in top-gun fame) but that it is no longer needed since jets now shoot missiles at each other from miles away. .


Whoever wrote that was obviously brought up on Top Gun. The F14 was designed to be a Long Range Fleet interceptor using the extremely advanced (then) Hughes AIM 64 Pheonix Missile system originally designed for the TBX (F111 Naval). It was expected to engage enemy bomber fleets at ranges exceeding 100 mile.
Whilst it did possess dogfighting ability and reintroduced an internal gun to the Navy Fighter its primary role was long range interception and NOT Dog Fighting.
Cheers
Spanner
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 8:50 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

"Whoever wrote that was obviously brought up on Top Gun. The F14 was designed to be a Long Range Fleet interceptor using the extremely advanced (then) Hughes AIM 64 Pheonix Missile system originally designed for the TBX (F111 Naval). It was expected to engage enemy bomber fleets at ranges exceeding 100 mile.
Whilst it did possess dogfighting ability and reintroduced an internal gun to the Navy Fighter its primary role was long range interception and NOT Dog Fighting.
Cheers
Spanner"

Spanner - If you look a couple messages below thatone you'll find my defense of the last true dog-fighter the F-15. As an old 'Eagle Keeper' I couldn't do anything else Smile

Oh and the F-11 was the TFX (although calling it a fighter is a whole lot less accurate than calling the F-14 a dog fighter :-))

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
David_Reasoner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 127
Location: South Central Kentucky
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 2:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- bsmart

Oh and the F-11 was the TFX (although calling it a fighter is a whole lot less accurate than calling the F-14 a dog fighter :-))


Bob, I assume you're referring to the proposed F-111B, rather than the Grumman F-11 Tiger Laughing The old F-11 (of one-time Blue Angels fame) certainly WAS a dogfighter.

David
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

You got it. finger didn't hit enough 1s and I didn't catch it before it went (Actually I had to leave for a meeting as I sent it so didn't see it until now Sad

I remember when the Blue Angels went from teh F-11 to the F-4. The Air Force Thunderbirds went from the F-100 to the F-4 at about the same time. Both switched to other aircraft very soon. The F-4 for all it's good qualities was not meant to be a tight turning show bird!!

Quick Quiz - Does anyone know the other time the Thunderbirds changed out of a new plane much sooner than expected?

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:49 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- bsmart
"Whoever wrote that was obviously brought up on Top Gun. The F14 was designed to be a Long Range Fleet interceptor using the extremely advanced (then) Hughes AIM 64 Pheonix Missile system originally designed for the TBX (F111 Naval). It was expected to engage enemy bomber fleets at ranges exceeding 100 mile.
Whilst it did possess dogfighting ability and reintroduced an internal gun to the Navy Fighter its primary role was long range interception and NOT Dog Fighting.
Cheers
Spanner"


Oh and the F-111 was the TFX (although calling it a fighter is a whole lot less accurate than calling the F-14 a dog fighter :-))


..a mission which the F111 could have performed....at long range. There was an interesting episode during which the Navy COS or SecNav and Thomas Moorer (then CNO) were being grilled on why there was resistance from Naval aviators about accepting the F111 (marinized) as it's principle fighter in harmony with the Air Force...Moorers' boss being a "yes" man and saying "sure we can...it just needs more thrust to overcome it's mass".
The SecDef (I believe) noted Moorers' qualifications and skeptical look and asked him, in front of his boss, whether he thought more thrust would make the F111 (TFX) platform a fighter acceptable to the Navy. He replied (at some risk to his career) "Sir, in my opinion, all the thrust in Christendom would not make a fighter out of the F111."

It was virtually a dead issue after that....
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
David_Reasoner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 127
Location: South Central Kentucky
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:58 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- bsmart
I remember when the Blue Angels went from teh F-11 to the F-4. The Air Force Thunderbirds went from the F-100 to the F-4 at about the same time. Both switched to other aircraft very soon. The F-4 for all it's good qualities was not meant to be a tight turning show bird!!

Quick Quiz - Does anyone know the other time the Thunderbirds changed out of a new plane much sooner than expected?


Hence my earlier remark about the F-4 and it's Rhino moniker. The "official" reason for the switch from F-4E to T-38A for the T-birds was fuel cost savings. About this time the Blue Angels went from F-4 to A-4 for similar reasons. I have no idea on the answer to your quiz.

David
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:03 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- bsmart
Quick Quiz - Does anyone know the other time the Thunderbirds changed out of a new plane much sooner than expected?


F1015B T'Chief? Transitioned back to the F100 mighty quick....
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
David_Reasoner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 127
Location: South Central Kentucky
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:16 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- Doug_Kibbey
- bsmart
Quick Quiz - Does anyone know the other time the Thunderbirds changed out of a new plane much sooner than expected?


F1015B T'Chief? Transitioned back to the F100 mighty quick....


I wasn't aware they had gone back to the F-100 after the F-105 (before my time...), but if so that is probably what Bob was referring to. The "Thud" wasn't much on close-in dogfighting, either. Although it did bag it's share of MiG's during the early years of the air war in Vietnam.

David
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:25 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

- Doug_Kibbey
- bsmart
Quick Quiz - Does anyone know the other time the Thunderbirds changed out of a new plane much sooner than expected?


F1015B T'Chief? Transitioned back to the F100 mighty quick....
You got it! It appears there were about 6 shows with the F105B when it was decided (after a fatal accident) thet the birds needed extensive modifications. Instead they went to the F-100D (They had used the F-100C before)

I was looking at the Thunderbird web site and it says they used the F-4 for sevral years and transitioned out of it because of the 'Energy Crisis' in the Early 70s. The entire group of T-38s used less fuell than one F-4!

A pilot I knew later on F-15s flew with the T-birds in the F-4 era and told a slightly different story. Although he loved the Phantom no one liked it in the type of flying the Tbirds did. Some of the Tbirds wanted to go to the F-5 but the powers that be didn't want to use a 'second rate fighter' The energy crisis gave them the excuse to go to the lighter airframe but the same powers that be wouldn't step up to the more poerful F-5E/F version that was just becoming available. So they were left with 'standard' T-38s

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:27 pm
Post subject: Re: Armor and Helicopter losses in the war....

My Google-fu is strong, Master...

"Almost a footnote in the history of Thunderbird aviation, the Republic-built F-105B Thunderchief performed only six shows between April 26 and May 9, 1964. Extensive modifications to the F-105 were necessary, and rather than cancel the rest of the show season to accomplish this, the Thunderbirds quickly transitioned back to the Super Sabre. While the switch back to the F-100D was supposed to be temporary, the F-105 never returned to the Thunderbird hangar. The F-100 ended up staying with the team for nearly 13 years."

www.aviationheritagemu...rbirds.htm


BTW, there is (or was) an F-11 Tiger in Blue Angels colors in the aviation museum outside Topeka, I think it is...indoor...very nice.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 2 of 3
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum