±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 808
Total: 808
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Photo Gallery
04: Member Screenshots
05: Downloads
06: News Archive
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: Photo Gallery
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: Photo Gallery
13: Community Forums
14: Home
15: Photo Gallery
16: Home
17: Photo Gallery
18: Member Screenshots
19: Community Forums
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Home
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Downloads
29: Photo Gallery
30: Community Forums
31: Home
32: Photo Gallery
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Photo Gallery
38: Community Forums
39: Home
40: Community Forums
41: Photo Gallery
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Home
45: Community Forums
46: Home
47: Community Forums
48: Downloads
49: Downloads
50: Community Forums
51: Statistics
52: Home
53: Downloads
54: News Archive
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Home
59: Member Screenshots
60: Community Forums
61: Photo Gallery
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Downloads
65: Home
66: Home
67: Community Forums
68: Home
69: Community Forums
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Photo Gallery
76: Community Forums
77: Home
78: Downloads
79: Home
80: Photo Gallery
81: Photo Gallery
82: Member Screenshots
83: Member Screenshots
84: Member Screenshots
85: Member Screenshots
86: Member Screenshots
87: Member Screenshots
88: Member Screenshots
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: Home
92: Home
93: Member Screenshots
94: Photo Gallery
95: Photo Gallery
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Home
99: Community Forums
100: Home
101: Community Forums
102: Downloads
103: Community Forums
104: Photo Gallery
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Home
108: Community Forums
109: Home
110: Photo Gallery
111: Photo Gallery
112: Home
113: Photo Gallery
114: Community Forums
115: Member Screenshots
116: Photo Gallery
117: Photo Gallery
118: Downloads
119: Downloads
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Downloads
123: Community Forums
124: Home
125: Photo Gallery
126: Community Forums
127: Member Screenshots
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Home
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Your Account
139: Home
140: Community Forums
141: Photo Gallery
142: Community Forums
143: Photo Gallery
144: Downloads
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Member Screenshots
154: Statistics
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Home
160: Community Forums
161: Downloads
162: Home
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Home
167: Community Forums
168: Your Account
169: Photo Gallery
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Downloads
173: Member Screenshots
174: Community Forums
175: Photo Gallery
176: Community Forums
177: Member Screenshots
178: Photo Gallery
179: Home
180: Community Forums
181: Community Forums
182: Photo Gallery
183: Community Forums
184: Member Screenshots
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Member Screenshots
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: Photo Gallery
191: Community Forums
192: Your Account
193: Home
194: Community Forums
195: Home
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Photo Gallery
200: Home
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: News Archive
206: Downloads
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Home
211: Home
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Home
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Community Forums
224: Community Forums
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Home
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Community Forums
233: Downloads
234: Statistics
235: Member Screenshots
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: News Archive
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Community Forums
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: Downloads
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Downloads
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Photo Gallery
255: Member Screenshots
256: Community Forums
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Photo Gallery
261: News Archive
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Member Screenshots
266: Community Forums
267: Downloads
268: Member Screenshots
269: Downloads
270: News Archive
271: Home
272: Photo Gallery
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: News Archive
278: Community Forums
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: Member Screenshots
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Member Screenshots
286: Home
287: Community Forums
288: Community Forums
289: Member Screenshots
290: Member Screenshots
291: Community Forums
292: Photo Gallery
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Member Screenshots
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Community Forums
300: Community Forums
301: Downloads
302: Member Screenshots
303: Member Screenshots
304: Member Screenshots
305: Home
306: Photo Gallery
307: Member Screenshots
308: News Archive
309: Community Forums
310: Member Screenshots
311: Community Forums
312: Community Forums
313: Community Forums
314: Community Forums
315: News Archive
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Photo Gallery
322: Community Forums
323: Community Forums
324: Community Forums
325: Community Forums
326: News Archive
327: Member Screenshots
328: Home
329: Photo Gallery
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: Your Account
333: Member Screenshots
334: Member Screenshots
335: Community Forums
336: Downloads
337: Community Forums
338: News Archive
339: Home
340: Community Forums
341: Home
342: Photo Gallery
343: Home
344: Community Forums
345: Downloads
346: Community Forums
347: Community Forums
348: Community Forums
349: Community Forums
350: Community Forums
351: News Archive
352: Community Forums
353: News Archive
354: Community Forums
355: Community Forums
356: Community Forums
357: Member Screenshots
358: Community Forums
359: Downloads
360: Photo Gallery
361: Community Forums
362: Community Forums
363: Community Forums
364: Community Forums
365: Community Forums
366: Community Forums
367: Community Forums
368: Community Forums
369: Member Screenshots
370: News Archive
371: Community Forums
372: Community Forums
373: Statistics
374: Downloads
375: Community Forums
376: Community Forums
377: Photo Gallery
378: Community Forums
379: Downloads
380: Home
381: Community Forums
382: Community Forums
383: Home
384: Photo Gallery
385: Photo Gallery
386: Community Forums
387: Member Screenshots
388: Home
389: Community Forums
390: Community Forums
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: Community Forums
394: Photo Gallery
395: Community Forums
396: Photo Gallery
397: Photo Gallery
398: Community Forums
399: Community Forums
400: Photo Gallery
401: Your Account
402: Community Forums
403: Community Forums
404: Photo Gallery
405: Photo Gallery
406: Member Screenshots
407: Community Forums
408: Community Forums
409: Community Forums
410: Your Account
411: Community Forums
412: Community Forums
413: Community Forums
414: Home
415: Community Forums
416: Home
417: Community Forums
418: Photo Gallery
419: Photo Gallery
420: Community Forums
421: Community Forums
422: Statistics
423: News Archive
424: Community Forums
425: Community Forums
426: Your Account
427: Community Forums
428: Community Forums
429: Community Forums
430: Member Screenshots
431: Community Forums
432: Home
433: Photo Gallery
434: Photo Gallery
435: Home
436: Community Forums
437: Photo Gallery
438: Photo Gallery
439: Community Forums
440: Downloads
441: Home
442: Community Forums
443: Community Forums
444: Community Forums
445: Community Forums
446: Photo Gallery
447: Community Forums
448: Community Forums
449: Home
450: Community Forums
451: Community Forums
452: Home
453: Community Forums
454: Home
455: News Archive
456: Community Forums
457: Home
458: Member Screenshots
459: Community Forums
460: Community Forums
461: Community Forums
462: Photo Gallery
463: Home
464: Home
465: Photo Gallery
466: Home
467: Community Forums
468: Community Forums
469: Community Forums
470: News Archive
471: Community Forums
472: Community Forums
473: News Archive
474: Community Forums
475: News Archive
476: Community Forums
477: News
478: Community Forums
479: Community Forums
480: Community Forums
481: Home
482: Community Forums
483: Community Forums
484: Community Forums
485: Photo Gallery
486: Community Forums
487: Photo Gallery
488: Home
489: Home
490: Home
491: Downloads
492: Photo Gallery
493: News Archive
494: News Archive
495: Photo Gallery
496: Member Screenshots
497: Home
498: Member Screenshots
499: News Archive
500: Your Account
501: Photo Gallery
502: Photo Gallery
503: Community Forums
504: Community Forums
505: Community Forums
506: News Archive
507: Community Forums
508: Photo Gallery
509: News Archive
510: Photo Gallery
511: Community Forums
512: Search
513: Member Screenshots
514: Photo Gallery
515: Photo Gallery
516: News Archive
517: Photo Gallery
518: Statistics
519: Home
520: Community Forums
521: Home
522: Community Forums
523: Home
524: Community Forums
525: Community Forums
526: Downloads
527: Community Forums
528: Community Forums
529: Community Forums
530: Community Forums
531: Home
532: Statistics
533: Community Forums
534: Community Forums
535: Community Forums
536: Community Forums
537: Home
538: Photo Gallery
539: Downloads
540: Home
541: Home
542: Community Forums
543: Member Screenshots
544: Member Screenshots
545: Home
546: Community Forums
547: Community Forums
548: Community Forums
549: Home
550: News Archive
551: Downloads
552: Community Forums
553: Community Forums
554: Photo Gallery
555: Photo Gallery
556: Community Forums
557: Photo Gallery
558: Member Screenshots
559: Your Account
560: Photo Gallery
561: Statistics
562: Community Forums
563: Community Forums
564: Downloads
565: Community Forums
566: Community Forums
567: Member Screenshots
568: Community Forums
569: Member Screenshots
570: Downloads
571: Community Forums
572: Community Forums
573: Home
574: Community Forums
575: Member Screenshots
576: Home
577: Downloads
578: Your Account
579: Community Forums
580: Member Screenshots
581: Home
582: Community Forums
583: Home
584: Community Forums
585: Community Forums
586: Community Forums
587: Community Forums
588: Your Account
589: Community Forums
590: Community Forums
591: Community Forums
592: Photo Gallery
593: Photo Gallery
594: Community Forums
595: Home
596: Photo Gallery
597: Community Forums
598: Community Forums
599: Community Forums
600: Community Forums
601: Community Forums
602: Community Forums
603: Statistics
604: Community Forums
605: Home
606: Community Forums
607: Community Forums
608: Community Forums
609: News Archive
610: Community Forums
611: Member Screenshots
612: Community Forums
613: Community Forums
614: Community Forums
615: Home
616: Community Forums
617: Community Forums
618: Your Account
619: Community Forums
620: Community Forums
621: Home
622: Community Forums
623: Photo Gallery
624: Community Forums
625: Community Forums
626: Community Forums
627: Community Forums
628: Your Account
629: Member Screenshots
630: Community Forums
631: Home
632: Community Forums
633: Home
634: Community Forums
635: Community Forums
636: Community Forums
637: Community Forums
638: Community Forums
639: Member Screenshots
640: Community Forums
641: Community Forums
642: Community Forums
643: Community Forums
644: Downloads
645: Member Screenshots
646: Home
647: Community Forums
648: Community Forums
649: Community Forums
650: Member Screenshots
651: Downloads
652: Community Forums
653: Community Forums
654: Community Forums
655: Photo Gallery
656: Community Forums
657: Community Forums
658: Home
659: Downloads
660: Community Forums
661: Member Screenshots
662: Community Forums
663: Photo Gallery
664: Home
665: Home
666: Photo Gallery
667: Home
668: Community Forums
669: Community Forums
670: Home
671: Community Forums
672: Community Forums
673: Community Forums
674: Member Screenshots
675: Community Forums
676: Downloads
677: Community Forums
678: Community Forums
679: Photo Gallery
680: Community Forums
681: Community Forums
682: Community Forums
683: Home
684: Community Forums
685: Community Forums
686: Community Forums
687: Community Forums
688: Community Forums
689: Member Screenshots
690: Downloads
691: Community Forums
692: Community Forums
693: Member Screenshots
694: Community Forums
695: Photo Gallery
696: Community Forums
697: Photo Gallery
698: Community Forums
699: Downloads
700: Home
701: Your Account
702: Photo Gallery
703: News Archive
704: Community Forums
705: Home
706: Community Forums
707: Member Screenshots
708: Member Screenshots
709: Member Screenshots
710: Community Forums
711: Community Forums
712: Community Forums
713: Member Screenshots
714: Community Forums
715: Community Forums
716: Community Forums
717: Community Forums
718: Member Screenshots
719: Community Forums
720: Community Forums
721: Photo Gallery
722: Downloads
723: Community Forums
724: Community Forums
725: Community Forums
726: Community Forums
727: Community Forums
728: Community Forums
729: Photo Gallery
730: Community Forums
731: Community Forums
732: Community Forums
733: Photo Gallery
734: Community Forums
735: Member Screenshots
736: Photo Gallery
737: Community Forums
738: Photo Gallery
739: Community Forums
740: Community Forums
741: Community Forums
742: Community Forums
743: Community Forums
744: Community Forums
745: Community Forums
746: News Archive
747: Home
748: Photo Gallery
749: Member Screenshots
750: Community Forums
751: Community Forums
752: Photo Gallery
753: Community Forums
754: News Archive
755: Downloads
756: Community Forums
757: Community Forums
758: Community Forums
759: Community Forums
760: News Archive
761: Community Forums
762: Downloads
763: Community Forums
764: Member Screenshots
765: Member Screenshots
766: Community Forums
767: Community Forums
768: Community Forums
769: Community Forums
770: Community Forums
771: Member Screenshots
772: Photo Gallery
773: Community Forums
774: Community Forums
775: Community Forums
776: Community Forums
777: Community Forums
778: Community Forums
779: Community Forums
780: Photo Gallery
781: Photo Gallery
782: Photo Gallery
783: Photo Gallery
784: Community Forums
785: Member Screenshots
786: Community Forums
787: Home
788: Member Screenshots
789: Downloads
790: News Archive
791: Home
792: Statistics
793: Member Screenshots
794: Community Forums
795: Community Forums
796: Photo Gallery
797: Community Forums
798: Community Forums
799: Downloads
800: Community Forums
801: Downloads
802: Community Forums
803: Downloads
804: Community Forums
805: Community Forums
806: News Archive
807: Community Forums
808: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Tiger I – pathetic reliability?
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
lehr
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 24, 2006
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:16 pm
Post subject: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

This was posted on a forum on BoardGameGeek (I have the quote below so you do not have to use the link - for some reason BGG web pages can take a long time to download).

Geek List: wargames worth pre-ordering

The game’s designer gives some history of one of the units:

BTW, a little history of that counter....

That counter is schwere Panzer-Kompanie Hummel (K.St.N. 1176(f.g)) and was equipped with 14 PzKpfw VI Tiger Is...

It was formed in July 1944 at the Pz.Ers.Abt.500 in Paderborn, Germany as an "Alarmeinheit". After recovering from wounds in Italy, Hauptmann Hans Hummel was placed in command. Hummel selected his subcommanders available at PzErsAbt 500 from the officers present he knew from fighting in Italy with Pz.Abt 504.

His unit was alerted at around 12:30am on September 18th and was ordered to report to the Arnhem area. The unit arrived at Bocholt station on the morning of the 19th.

With the rail line blocked from allied air interdiction and other traffic proceeding in both directions, and with no tank transporters available, Hummel was ordered to proceed the 80 kms with the Tigers under their own power.

Tigers, as many of you might know, are not the most reliable of tanks under heavy use and all but 2 broke down during the trip. The two lucky tanks to make the trip without braking down were commanded by Leutnant Knaack and Feldwebel Barneki. They arrived around nightfall of the 19th at the Arnhem bridge perimeter.

The entire unit was not fully formed until the 24th - sans 3 Tigers.


Only 2 out of 14 Tiger Is (14%) made the 80km (50 mile) trip without breakdown. Compared with many other theaters of WWII, Holland in September does not seem like it would have the most demanding terrain or weather.

Is this reliability typical of Tiger Is?

What about other WWII tanks?

If 14 Shermans set out on the same trip how many would make it without breaking down?

What about 14 T-34s?

What about 14 AFVs with which you have personal experience (including post WWII)?

I am sure a lot depends on the condition of the tanks at the start of the trip, but the above performance just seems really bad. It seems like reliability like this would greatly reduce the effectiveness of an AFV especially on the offensive.

Any comments, knowledge and experience greatly appreciated.
Back to top
View user's profile
Sabot
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 380
Location: Kentucky
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:54 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

The Tiger got a bad reputation (mechanically) at Kursk because they were deployed without first working all of the bugs out of them. Additionally, in wintery muddy weather, the mud would freeze between the road wheels overnight and immobilize the tank.

It also suffered from poor fuel consumption. I do not know the range of the tank off hand, but I believe it was less than 100 miles.

The Sherman was a mechanically sound vehicle and a 50 mile trip would have been easy to accomplish. The Sherman came with about four different engine types and fuel efficiency and reliability depended on which engine was being used.

_________________
RobG
Back to top
View user's profile AIM Address
PattonCurator
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 8:38 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

Agree about the Shermans - very reliable - probably 13 of the 14 would make the 50 mile trip (and the 14th would probably make it late after the crew repaired it. The T34 also has the same rugged reliability.

Charles
Back to top
View user's profile
Dubliner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 94

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 9:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

nt


Last edited by Dubliner on Sat Mar 24, 2007 2:06 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 10:45 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

- lehr
Only 2 out of 14 Tiger Is (14%) made the 80km (50 mile) trip without breakdown. Compared with many other theaters of WWII, Holland in September does not seem like it would have the most demanding terrain or weather.

Is this reliability typical of Tiger Is?


The Tiger was a heavy and fairly complicated vehicle which needed a lot of maintenance to operate properly. IIRC the operation manuals for the Tiger states that the crew has to check a number of things on the vehicle for every 15km of road march and fix any problems encountered. So you need crews that know their mount, you need conditions that allows the crew to take care of the vehicle and of course you need spares and maintenance units to fix any problems that occur during the roadmarch. Once you start removing some of those prerequisites for keeping your Tiger happy, chances are there will be trouble.

Tigers of s.SS-PzAbt 101 travelled about 300 kilometers on the road from Northern France to Normandy in June 1944, starting out with 45 tanks on June 7th and was down to 17 operational Tigers on June 12th. Most of the reminder had broken down along the road. It is evident that once tanks start to brake down along a 300 kilometer journey, it is impossible for the maintenance company to help everyone and things will start to fall apart. I has to be said that this battalion did come under allied air attack as well, which clearly didn't help the situation any. AFAIK no Tigers were lossed to allied airpower until June 13th.
A major problem for s.SS-PzAbt 101 was that their new Tiges used the steel-rimmed wheels which were very hard on the tracks, particularily the tracks pins, when travelling on hard surfaces.

IIRC Kompanie Hummel took over their Tigers from Pz.Ers.u.Ausb.Abt 500, a training formation, so they might have been well used vehicles to begin with.

- lehr
What about other WWII tanks?

If 14 Shermans set out on the same trip how many would make it without breaking down?

What about 14 T-34s?


WWII tanks were generally fragile beasts compared with modern equipment, but neither the Sherman nor the T-34 were as heavy and complex as the Tiger I. They would probably suffer a lot less from the strains of a long roadmarch and the Sherman in particular would benefit from its rubber rimmed wheels and rubber-bushed track pins.

That said, T-34s were not really known for their production quality or reliability, at least through parts of the war, so my money would be on the Sherman as the more reliable, everything else being equal.

- lehr
I am sure a lot depends on the condition of the tanks at the start of the trip, but the above performance just seems really bad. It seems like reliability like this would greatly reduce the effectiveness of an AFV especially on the offensive.


Indeed. But I think we have to keep in mind the day and age of these machines. In WWI, you could start with 400 tanks and in a couple of days you would have very few left in operational condition, the rest being mostly broken down or stuck rather than destroyed. That lesson was carried over to WWII which is why early war German armoured divisions had up to 350 tanks. That way they could afford to have half of them out of order and still pack a punch. That was clearly demonstrated during the Battle for France when a division could drop to 50% of its strength in a few days of operation and then raise the figure to 80% after a day or two of maintenance and repair.

My 2 ørers worth anyway

Claus B

PS: Sabot, the Tiger was first employed around Leningrad in November 1942, I think you are confusing it with the Panther, which had some serious issues during its combat debut at Kursk in 1943 (and several months after that as well, but that's a different issue).
Back to top
View user's profile
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 6:22 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

I rather wonder if it was less a problem with the Tigers and more a problem with German maintenance units. You hear about American tank maintenance units doing heroic work all night long in order to get the tanks back up and running in the morning. Now that i recall, the book "Deathtraps" had some especially nasty things to say about the original Sherman radial engine. In that book I recall he broke-down what proportion of men in a Tank Battalion were involved in vehicle maintenance, and it was a grotesquely large number. By '44 Germany probably couldn't afford the manpower for an effective maintenance section.
Back to top
View user's profile
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 10:47 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

The following is from “German Tanks of World War II� by Dr. S. Hart and Dr. R. Hart.(p.123-124)

“One engagement, during the 1944 Allied campaign in Italy, highlights the difficulties the Germans faced thanks to the poor cross-country performance, mechanical unreliability and the sheer physical bulk of the Tiger I tank. Between 23 and 25 May 1944, the 16Tigers of the 3rd Company, 506th Heavy Tank Battalion fought a costly engagement around Cori. On 23 May, the company advanced across a railway embankment and engaged Allied armour, but during the crossing three Tigers were disabled, two with track problems and one with gearbox failure. The Tiger's 2.02m (6ft Sin) barrel-overhang also proved a problem, as two other Tiger tanks accidentally jammed their guns into the soil as they came down the steep-sided embankment and had to be towed clear. Eventually 13 Tigers continued the advance during which they knocked out six Sherman tanks. During this attack, however, Allied artillery damaged another Tiger which withdrew back to a German workshop. The next day Allied anti-tank fire disabled another Tiger which was blown up by its crew.

“The company was then ordered to withdraw. While five Tigers held back an Allied attack, the remaining six tanks tried to tow away the three disabled Tigers by the embankment. However, the strain caused four of the six towing Tigers to break down. The Germans then had to destroy the three disabled tanks by the embankment and use the remaining two Tigers to tow back the four that had broken down. By the time the company had withdrawn to Cori, two of its five rearguard tanks had been disabled (one by Allied fire and the other because of a gearbox fault) while one of the two towing tanks had also broken down. Hence, while the three operational rearguard Tigers continued to block the Allied advance, back at Cori the company commander could deploy just one working Tiger and six disabled ones. With the rearguard now unable to stop the Allied advance into Cori, and with recovery vehicles unable to reach the company in time, the commander ordered the destruction of the six disabled Tigers to prevent them falling into Allied hands, while his remaining four tanks withdrew north. The company had lost 12 Tigers, but only three had been disabled by Allied fire. Clearly, the Tiger's mechanical unreliability was more of a threat than Allied fire.�
Back to top
View user's profile
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 11:54 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

As a career Tanker, I can only imagine the utter frustration of the crews. Knowing that they man such a powerful vehicle, but having to 'scuttle' them due to mechanical unreliability.

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 6:53 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

- J.McGillivray
The following is from “German Tanks of World War II� by Dr. S. Hart and Dr. R. Hart.(p.123-124)

“One engagement, during the 1944 Allied campaign in Italy, highlights the difficulties the Germans faced thanks to the poor cross-country performance, mechanical unreliability and the sheer physical bulk of the Tiger I tank. Between 23 and 25 May 1944, the 16Tigers of the 3rd Company, 506th Heavy Tank Battalion fought a costly engagement around Cori.


In all fairness, this particular example is one of the worst performances of a Tiger unit and hardly typical. The unit was 3. Kompanie s.PzAbt 508 and there are at least two different accounts of what happened.

The company was caught in the middle of a major allied advance and apparently had no backup from the battalion maintenance company which had the heavy recovery vehicles. In the end, tanks with even minor damage, combat or mechanical, had to blown up or left to the enemy as the allies were advancing past the damaged vehicles. In such situations, armour losses are always high, regardless of type.

If you look at the incident, you start with three tanks breaking down on May 23rd. Two threw their tracks, which was not, to my knowledge, a common complaint with the Tiger, so it should probably not be put down to unreliability but rather accident (bad maintenance, bad driving, bad terriain or bad luck). One had transmission trouble, which is more like the kind of fault you would ascribe to mechanical deficiencies.

Then they try to recover the three broken down tanks by towing them after six other Tigers. AFAIK this procedure was actually forbidden unless there was imminent danger of the damaged tank falling into enemy hands. Tigers were not designed for such work, they had enough trouble shifting their own weight around.
Here the stories start to differ. In the Hart & Hart account, four of the towing tanks brakes down with transmission damage and one additional tank brakes down towing while two Tigers are trying to tow four other Tigers - a somewhat dubious claim, I think! In any case, this means that five Tigers broke down with transmission damage from towing.
In the report quoted by Jentz, four tanks of the six towing brakes down and then gets towed in turn by four other Tigers. These four Tigers make it, but later two of them brakes down transmission damage as well and it is tempting to assume that this had to do with the fact that they had been acting as recovery vehicles for most of the day. Another one of these four also brakes down later in the day with unspecified "technical problems".

Hart & Hart mentions another, non-towing Tiger braking down with transmission trouble later as well, which makes it two "unprovoked" transmission failures. In the Jentz account, you can argue that only one tank suffered from "unprovoked" transmission trouble while all the others broke down because of misuse.

When the allied forces neared the collection point for the damaged vehicles, the Tigers were blown up - six according to Hart & Hart, nine according to the Jentz report.

One could argue that if the company had the support from the necessary recovery vehicles, they might have lost between five and seven fewer tanks, namely those that broke down trying to recover the other losses.

During its time in Italy prior to this incident (from mid-february), the battalion managed to keep about 57% of its vehicles operational on average, with a low of 17% and a high of 93%. And it did see a fair amount of combat in the period.

Bottom line is that I think this story is more about the Tigers mechanical fragility than it unreliability. It did not stand up well to abuse, but does that make it unreliable? And of course it speaks of the problems involved in being overrun by the enemy!

Claus B
Back to top
View user's profile
lehr
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 24, 2006
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:52 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

Thanks to all for your replies. It's easy to see the importance of firepower, armor and mobility, but now I have a greater appreciation for the importance of reliability and maintenance support.
Back to top
View user's profile
Dirk
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 115
Location: South Africa
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:26 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

great thread - interesting discussion .

My 2 cents - The Tiger did the job it was designed for and thus could perhaps be viewed as a success.

Only thing was that the support system for the Tiger was not implemented , IIRC from a post-graduate course in Logistics Engineering I had :

Support the design and design the support .

My humble opinion Wink

Dirk
Back to top
View user's profile
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 7:31 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

One problem the late Tiger II chassis' had to worry about that I don't think the early Tiger I chassis did was slave labor teams being forced to assemble them. I recall (working of distant memory here) there's an account in the big 653rd book of Jadgtigers leaving the factory near war's en and hardly making it 40 miles out of town before most of them had broken down. It seems the radiators were so shoddily constructed that coolant flow was drastically restricted, quickly causing breakdowns due to overheating. It's tempting to imagine a heroic slave laborer risking death while purposefully soldering the radiators half-shut.

Its funny comparing this discussion with contemporary Allied accounts of German armor. It seems the grass in always greener on the other side. From the U.S. side the German tanks appeared to have better flotation (ground pressure), maneuverability, optics, armor, guns, engines (compared to the old radial), and pretty much everything else! Well, The U.S. tankers did prefer their own radios, turret drives, and HC smoke shell. But that's about it.
Back to top
View user's profile
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 2:47 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

- mike_Duplessis
One problem the late Tiger II chassis' had to worry about that I don't think the early Tiger I chassis did was slave labor teams being forced to assemble them. I recall (working of distant memory here) there's an account in the big 653rd book of Jadgtigers leaving the factory near war's en and hardly making it 40 miles out of town before most of them had broken down. It seems the radiators were so shoddily constructed that coolant flow was drastically restricted, quickly causing breakdowns due to overheating. It's tempting to imagine a heroic slave laborer risking death while purposefully soldering the radiators half-shut.


Or just doing sloppy work due to lack of training, skill, and motivation. But definately a factor - in one German plant (MAN Nürnberg), 55% of the work was made by foreign labour, non-Germans drafted as workers in the occupied countries.

- mike_Duplessis
Its funny comparing this discussion with contemporary Allied accounts of German armor. It seems the grass in always greener on the other side. From the U.S. side the German tanks appeared to have better flotation (ground pressure), maneuverability, optics, armor, guns, engines (compared to the old radial), and pretty much everything else! Well, The U.S. tankers did prefer their own radios, turret drives, and HC smoke shell. But that's about it.


That is really a different issue. Reliability, logistics and production concerns probably becomes a moot point if you are in the field, looking down the barrel of a bigger and badder enemy tank. On the other hand, if reliability, logistics and production does not work, you wont even have a tank, at least not at working one Smile

Claus B
Back to top
View user's profile
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 3:31 pm
Post subject: Re: Tiger I – pathetic reliability?

Robin Neillands in his book “The Desert Rats 7th Armoured Division 1940 – 1945� sums things up nicely as followers:

“At this point it may be necessary to explain to a section of the readership that the successful development of a new weapon is far from being the end of the story. The weapon will have a designed range of technical features and benefits, but at least half the effectiveness of any weapon in battle will depend on how it is used, manned, serviced and deployed in battle….. How a weapon is used is therefore as critical to its success as its designed technical performance.�

People who sing the praises of the German cats often talk of their performance under ideal theoretical conditions; although those conditions were seldom encountered in the field. One must take into consideration the actual conditions there the cats were used, or misused.

For example the Panthers with their excellent gun and well sloped armoured, were often thrown into reckless, rushed, poorly planned and poorly supported counter attacks, in Normandy; which exposed the weaknesses of their design.

The most important fact that one must consider is that the Germans, in spite of their Tigers and Panthers, still lost the war. In other words the big cats failed to get the job done!
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum