±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 251
Total: 251
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Photo Gallery
02: Home
03: Home
04: Downloads
05: Home
06: Community Forums
07: Home
08: Your Account
09: Community Forums
10: Home
11: Your Account
12: Home
13: Home
14: Community Forums
15: Photo Gallery
16: Community Forums
17: Home
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: Home
21: Downloads
22: Photo Gallery
23: Home
24: Home
25: Home
26: Community Forums
27: Home
28: Search
29: Downloads
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Home
35: Member Screenshots
36: Statistics
37: News
38: Community Forums
39: Home
40: Member Screenshots
41: Home
42: Member Screenshots
43: Downloads
44: Home
45: Home
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Home
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Home
52: Home
53: Your Account
54: Home
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Home
58: Photo Gallery
59: Community Forums
60: Downloads
61: Home
62: Home
63: Home
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Community Forums
67: Home
68: Downloads
69: Home
70: Home
71: Community Forums
72: Photo Gallery
73: Home
74: Home
75: Home
76: Home
77: Home
78: Member Screenshots
79: Member Screenshots
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Home
83: Home
84: Home
85: Home
86: Community Forums
87: News Archive
88: Community Forums
89: Home
90: Community Forums
91: Home
92: Community Forums
93: News Archive
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Home
97: Home
98: Community Forums
99: Community Forums
100: Downloads
101: Home
102: Community Forums
103: Your Account
104: Your Account
105: Community Forums
106: Home
107: Home
108: Home
109: Downloads
110: Downloads
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: Downloads
114: Home
115: Community Forums
116: Home
117: Community Forums
118: Home
119: Home
120: Member Screenshots
121: Home
122: Community Forums
123: Home
124: Member Screenshots
125: Community Forums
126: Home
127: Home
128: Photo Gallery
129: Photo Gallery
130: Community Forums
131: Home
132: Home
133: Home
134: News
135: Community Forums
136: Your Account
137: Your Account
138: Home
139: Community Forums
140: Home
141: Community Forums
142: Home
143: Member Screenshots
144: Home
145: Home
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Home
149: Home
150: Home
151: Home
152: Downloads
153: Community Forums
154: Home
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Member Screenshots
158: Home
159: Member Screenshots
160: Community Forums
161: Home
162: Member Screenshots
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: Photo Gallery
166: Community Forums
167: Home
168: Home
169: Home
170: Home
171: Member Screenshots
172: News
173: Home
174: Home
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Home
180: Community Forums
181: Home
182: Downloads
183: Your Account
184: Community Forums
185: Home
186: Home
187: Home
188: Home
189: Home
190: Home
191: Contact
192: Member Screenshots
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Home
199: Community Forums
200: Home
201: Home
202: Home
203: Home
204: Home
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Home
213: Photo Gallery
214: Photo Gallery
215: Home
216: Home
217: Downloads
218: Member Screenshots
219: Downloads
220: Home
221: Home
222: Downloads
223: Home
224: Community Forums
225: Home
226: Community Forums
227: Home
228: Your Account
229: Downloads
230: Home
231: Community Forums
232: Community Forums
233: Member Screenshots
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Photo Gallery
237: Home
238: Home
239: Home
240: Home
241: Community Forums
242: Member Screenshots
243: Community Forums
244: Downloads
245: Community Forums
246: Downloads
247: Home
248: Home
249: Photo Gallery
250: Photo Gallery
251: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
AFV systems lose funding for now.....
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 7:02 am
Post subject: AFV systems lose funding for now.....

Hi Folks!

Just ran acrossed this report over at Military.com

Army Slashes Abrams, Bradley Funding
InsideDefense.com NewsStand | Jason Sherman | February 28, 2006
Eleventh hour cuts to the Army's portion of the fiscal year 2006 supplemental spending request stripped billions of dollars for key improvements to Abrams tanks and Bradley fighting vehicles, setting back service plans to modernize the force and threatening to break assembly lines that upgrade these front-line combat systems, according to Pentagon documents and industry officials.

Last-minute efforts by the Office of the Secretary of Defense to trim the Pentagon's supplemental request down to $65.3 billion in mid-February forced the Army to slash more than $2 billion from its combat tracked vehicle lines, according to Pentagon officials.

Army officials are now looking to the next “bridge supplemental� spending request -- which could come as soon as the fall -- to restore those funds, according to Pentagon documents.

But that may be too late to avoid an eight-month production break in the Abrams tank industrial base and cause severe disruptions in the Bradley line, driving up costs for the armored personnel carriers by as much as 50 percent, according to Pentagon documents and industry officials.

More than $1.2 billion was wrung from the Abrams tank line last week in the budget maneuver, sending shock waves through the tank industrial base and service modernization plans. This cut would delay fielding modernized tanks to both the active component and National Guard and push off engine improvements necessary for Iraqi urban operations, according to Pentagon documents.

The Army is looking to streamline by 2013 its fleet of Abrams tanks down to two types: the M1A2 System Enhancement Program (SEP) for the active force and the M1A1 Abrams Integrated Management (AIM) program for the National Guard.

That schedule may be reconsidered, industry officials said, in the wake of the recent cuts, which include: $588 million to produce 120 M1A2 SEP tanks for two enhanced brigade combat teams; $504 million for 210 M1A1AIM tanks for three brigade combat teams in the National Guard; and $155 million for the Tank Urban Survivability Kit that was to be purchased this year and fielded to units in Iraq next year.

The Bradley M2A3 program took a $1 billion hit, which will delay fielding the most advanced versions of the armored personnel carriers to three heavy brigade combat teams in the 1st Armed Division that are being transformed into modular units. The A3 variant of the Bradley has increased protection and is more survivable than older versions of the vehicle.

A key experimental Army unit that was slated to receive the A3 Bradleys will not receive them, according to Pentagon documents.

Without funds sought in the supplemental, Army effective Brady production plans could be derailed and upend the services' procurement strategy, driving up the unit cost of each vehicle by as much as 50 percent, according to Pentagon documents that detail the impact of the cuts.

Other combat tracked vehicle programs were also cut.

The M88A2 Hercules, designed to tow a disabled Abrams tank and other heavy tracked vehicles, had $331 million cut from the supplemental that were intended to completely outfit two heavy brigade combat teams. The cut will delay fielding of these vehicles by as many as three years, Pentagon documents state.

The M113 Family of Vehicles funding line also was cut by $90 million, which will affect improvements slated for 172 of the vehicles, including upgrades to the A3 variant of the M1068, M1064, M113 and M577, according to the Pentagon documents. A delay for these upgrade efforts will slow down by as many as two years transformation efforts of two active duty brigade combat teams at Fort Bliss and three National Guard brigade combat teams. The industrial base assembly line that support these upgrades will run out of work in fiscal year 2007.

Spot report!
Sgt, Scouts Out! Sad

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 2:12 pm
Post subject: Re: AFV systems lose funding for now.....

Sad
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
A2_Prius
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 27, 2006
Posts: 112

PostPosted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 12:26 am
Post subject: Re: AFV systems lose funding for now.....

I'll get flamed for saying so, but perhaps our troops could have these things if . . .

A. We hadn't been at war in Iraq for three years (thus far).

B. Katrina and Rita hadn't happened.

C. The Administration wasn't laboring under the illusion that the country could afford both A. and permanent tax cuts.
Back to top
View user's profile
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 2:28 am
Post subject: Re: AFV systems lose funding for now.....

- Doug_Kibbey
Sad


I hate it when politics pops up.... Confused

Spoils everything.....Free speech though.

Don
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 6:17 am
Post subject: Re: AFV systems lose funding for now.....

Whats sad is that the funds effected arent just the armor/tracked funds, but I'll bet that the funds for post housing/modernization, commisary/PX improvements, and so forth have also taken a hard hit. Soldier and family quality of life on post installations always suffers when funds are cut. Because then money starts getting juggled to "other"areas to try and equal things out. And I agree, I hate talking politics, too.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 9:45 am
Post subject: Re: AFV systems lose funding for now.....

Hi Folks!

There is also the 30,000 extra troops Congress ramed down the Army's throat. Possible this is DOD pay back to Congress for those extra troops.

While a lot of this is political give and take, I think the main point to try and remember is that there is NEVER enough funds to cover all the programs that the DOD would like to have.

The M114 Lingle is an out standing example. Two years after the Army started fielding that vehicle, it had decided that was not the vehicle it wanted and starting planning for a different vehicle. Due to a lack of funds that vehicle had to last much longer that anyone guessed it would have to.

Why during WWII did the Army standup and ship overseas the number of TOWED Anti-Tank Gun Battalions that it did. The powers that be, though those units would be effective and where MUCH CHEAPER that tank battalions. We all now know that while they were cheaper, they were never effective.

In some ways, the Army has only it's self to blame. After all just a very few years ago tank was a dirty four letter word. The top leadership didn't want and though they didn't need Abrams and Bradleys, why should we keep up war reservice stockpiles of parts or even complete vehicles.

I agree that some of it is politics, but in the end it really is about not enough funds to fund everything. Sad

My 2 cents.
Sgt, Scouts Out! Smile

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 12:14 pm
Post subject: Re: AFV systems lose funding for now.....

- Tumbleweed
I wonder what happened with FCS funding? I'd rather see that money spent on what we have now than to see the troops shortchanged.


It has taken a number of hits also. Take a second look at the follow line from the report.

'A key experimental Army unit that was slated to receive the A3 Bradleys will not receive them, according to Pentagon documents.'

That 'key experimental' unit is the FCS Unit of Action Brigade that will be standing up here at Ft. Bliss.

I think the FCS program is very slowly changing from a system of new vehicles with all kinds of bells and whisles (state of the art comm gear and command and control systems) to just the bells and whisles installed into what we already have now.

Spot Report and my 2 cents.
Sgt, Scouts Out! Smile

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 12:23 am
Post subject: Re: AFV systems lose funding for now.....

Sometimes it is more telling to inquire what items in the DoD budget DIDN'T get cut...like how many US$150M F-22s did they cut? Or how may Osprey's (which can't carry a HMMWV) got axed?

There are a lot of sacred cows in the Pentagon, and too often the priority is to protect a favorite system, regardless of what effect that has on the "boots on the ground". It could also be a political ploy, to make Congress add survivability and soldier welfare money back into the appropriations bill, this getting money for BOTH the neato systems and the boring old modernization money.

Or, I could just be getting very cynical in my old age...

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum