±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 342
Total: 342
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Photo Gallery
02: Community Forums
03: Home
04: Member Screenshots
05: Home
06: Photo Gallery
07: Home
08: Downloads
09: Photo Gallery
10: Community Forums
11: Photo Gallery
12: News Archive
13: Community Forums
14: News Archive
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Home
18: Photo Gallery
19: Home
20: Community Forums
21: Photo Gallery
22: Home
23: Community Forums
24: Home
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Home
28: Community Forums
29: Photo Gallery
30: Photo Gallery
31: Photo Gallery
32: Community Forums
33: Member Screenshots
34: Photo Gallery
35: Downloads
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: Member Screenshots
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Photo Gallery
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Photo Gallery
48: Statistics
49: Community Forums
50: Photo Gallery
51: Home
52: Member Screenshots
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Home
56: Member Screenshots
57: Community Forums
58: Statistics
59: Community Forums
60: Home
61: Photo Gallery
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Photo Gallery
67: Community Forums
68: Photo Gallery
69: Community Forums
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Community Forums
74: Home
75: Downloads
76: Statistics
77: Community Forums
78: Photo Gallery
79: Home
80: Community Forums
81: Photo Gallery
82: Home
83: Community Forums
84: Statistics
85: Photo Gallery
86: Downloads
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Home
90: Home
91: Community Forums
92: Photo Gallery
93: Community Forums
94: Home
95: News
96: Photo Gallery
97: Community Forums
98: Home
99: Home
100: Home
101: Home
102: Home
103: Photo Gallery
104: Home
105: Photo Gallery
106: Treasury
107: Photo Gallery
108: Community Forums
109: News Archive
110: Home
111: News
112: Community Forums
113: Home
114: News Archive
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Photo Gallery
118: Home
119: Community Forums
120: Home
121: Home
122: Photo Gallery
123: Photo Gallery
124: Community Forums
125: Photo Gallery
126: Home
127: Community Forums
128: Photo Gallery
129: Home
130: News Archive
131: Community Forums
132: Photo Gallery
133: Downloads
134: Home
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Home
138: Home
139: Home
140: Home
141: Community Forums
142: Home
143: News Archive
144: Photo Gallery
145: Community Forums
146: Photo Gallery
147: Home
148: Home
149: Home
150: Photo Gallery
151: Photo Gallery
152: Photo Gallery
153: Photo Gallery
154: Photo Gallery
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Photo Gallery
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Photo Gallery
162: Photo Gallery
163: Photo Gallery
164: Member Screenshots
165: Community Forums
166: Member Screenshots
167: Photo Gallery
168: Photo Gallery
169: Community Forums
170: Photo Gallery
171: Photo Gallery
172: Photo Gallery
173: Photo Gallery
174: Community Forums
175: News Archive
176: Member Screenshots
177: Your Account
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: Downloads
182: Community Forums
183: Photo Gallery
184: Home
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Photo Gallery
188: Community Forums
189: Photo Gallery
190: Photo Gallery
191: Community Forums
192: Home
193: Member Screenshots
194: Member Screenshots
195: Community Forums
196: Photo Gallery
197: Home
198: Photo Gallery
199: Community Forums
200: Photo Gallery
201: Member Screenshots
202: Photo Gallery
203: Home
204: Community Forums
205: Home
206: Photo Gallery
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Member Screenshots
210: News Archive
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Photo Gallery
215: Community Forums
216: Home
217: Photo Gallery
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: News Archive
221: Community Forums
222: News Archive
223: Community Forums
224: Downloads
225: Home
226: Photo Gallery
227: Home
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Photo Gallery
231: Community Forums
232: Photo Gallery
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Downloads
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Member Screenshots
242: Community Forums
243: Community Forums
244: Community Forums
245: Home
246: News Archive
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: Photo Gallery
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Photo Gallery
253: News Archive
254: Photo Gallery
255: Community Forums
256: Member Screenshots
257: Community Forums
258: Home
259: Member Screenshots
260: Community Forums
261: Your Account
262: Photo Gallery
263: Photo Gallery
264: Photo Gallery
265: Photo Gallery
266: Home
267: Community Forums
268: Home
269: Photo Gallery
270: Community Forums
271: Photo Gallery
272: Community Forums
273: Photo Gallery
274: Photo Gallery
275: News Archive
276: News Archive
277: Community Forums
278: Community Forums
279: Community Forums
280: Photo Gallery
281: News Archive
282: Statistics
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Photo Gallery
287: News Archive
288: Community Forums
289: Community Forums
290: Member Screenshots
291: Photo Gallery
292: Home
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: Member Screenshots
298: Community Forums
299: Community Forums
300: Photo Gallery
301: Home
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: LinkToUs
307: Home
308: Community Forums
309: Community Forums
310: Community Forums
311: News Archive
312: News Archive
313: Photo Gallery
314: Photo Gallery
315: Community Forums
316: Photo Gallery
317: Member Screenshots
318: Member Screenshots
319: Community Forums
320: Home
321: News
322: Community Forums
323: Home
324: Photo Gallery
325: Community Forums
326: Photo Gallery
327: Home
328: Home
329: Photo Gallery
330: Community Forums
331: Member Screenshots
332: Downloads
333: Community Forums
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: Home
337: Community Forums
338: Photo Gallery
339: Community Forums
340: Member Screenshots
341: News Archive
342: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
T-28 & T95
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:37 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- bsmart
C-8 I think was another Army plane (The DeHaviland Buffalo?)


Oooh, Oooh!...I know that one!

"The first four aircraft produced in 1964-65 were delivered to the U.S. Army under the designation YAC-2 (later changed to CV-7A and subsequently C-8A) but, as already stated, no American production order followed."

...and you will sometimes see the designation DHC-5A, but as it wasn't adopted, this is sort of a "limbo" name....


...and the A.F. F110 name for a Phantom was the "Spectre", but Ernst Blofeld put a stop to that with a blackmail scheme involving a satellite equipped with what he called a "Laser"....
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:48 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- Doug_Kibbey
- bsmart
C-8 I think was another Army plane (The DeHaviland Buffalo?)


Oooh, Oooh!...I know that one!

"The first four aircraft produced in 1964-65 were delivered to the U.S. Army under the designation YAC-2 (later changed to CV-7A and subsequently C-8A) but, as already stated, no American production order followed."

...and you will sometimes see the designation DHC-5A, but as it wasn't adopted, this is sort of a "limbo" name....
I think the C-8 was coming around just about the time of the 'Key West Agreement' that limited the Army to no 'large' or 'combat' Fixed wing Aircraft. The C-7 caribou was put as the armies upper limit and the C-8 bing a little larger would have had to be an Air Force Aircraft after the agreement. The Air Force said 'We have the old C-123s and the new C-130s we don't need another cargo plane to take dollars away from fighters and bombers. Oh and by the way don't even think about hanging guns, rockets or bombs on the O-2 Mohawks you have, even if they have six hardpoints under the wings and are stressed for tactical manouvers.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Jinx
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 186
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:40 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- bsmart
The Air Force got the F-5 for the fighter version of the T-38



Was this before or after the U.S. Navy used the designation F5D-1 for their prototype fighter (also known as the Skylancer)?
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:02 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- Jinx
- bsmart
The Air Force got the F-5 for the fighter version of the T-38



Was this before or after the U.S. Navy used the designation F5D-1 for their prototype fighter (also known as the Skylancer)?
The F5D had lost out to the F8U before the 'merger' of designations.

This was one of those 'poliitical decisions'. The F5D Skylancer. was a good fighter and seemed to have as much potential as the F8U Crusader. But Douglas at the time was building the F4D, AD, A3D, A4D, B-66 as well as a thriving Commercial business. Vought had no other business and there was some thought that it got the award to keep business spread around. Several years later the F8U-3 lost out to the F4H-1 and there were claims that with the successful F8U line still chugging along it was time to throw some Buisness in the direction of the struggling McDonnell company

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])


Last edited by bsmart on Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:29 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:16 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

All this for that little question! Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:20 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- JeffStringer
All this for that little question! lol
And when as the small scale of a question ever limited the amount we can stretch the thread Smile

Actually I just found a mistake in my list of Fighters!

The F-7 was not the F7U Cutlass.

Quiz Bonus 2 - What plane became the F-7?

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])


Last edited by bsmart on Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:31 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:30 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- Doug_Kibbey

...and the A.F. F110 name for a Phantom was the "Spectre", but Ernst Blofeld put a stop to that with a blackmail scheme involving a satellite equipped with what he called a "Laser"....


...Hey!...where's my extra credit for the F110 bonus question?!
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:35 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- Doug_Kibbey
- Doug_Kibbey

...and the A.F. F110 name for a Phantom was the "Spectre", but Ernst Blofeld put a stop to that with a blackmail scheme involving a satellite equipped with what he called a "Laser"....


...Hey!...where's my extra credit for the F110 bonus question?!
My apologies I didn't see the F110 part of your response when I was scanning the list before leaving work (did you add it to the C-7/C-8 answer later ?)

You get credit for the correct answer for the name Spectre. Also bonus points for the clarification of the Caribou/Buffalo

I'm still looking for the F-6, F-7 and F-10 (The F-7 is a very interesting story)

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])


Last edited by bsmart on Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:31 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:49 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- bsmart
- Doug_Kibbey
- Doug_Kibbey

...and the A.F. F110 name for a Phantom was the "Spectre", but Ernst Blofeld put a stop to that with a blackmail scheme involving a satellite equipped with what he called a "Laser"....


...Hey!...where's my extra credit for the F110 bonus question?!
My apologies I didn't see the F110 part of yoiur response when I was scanning the list before leaving work (did you add it to the C-7/C-8 answer later ?)

You get credit for the correct answer for the name Spectre. Also bonus points for the clarification of the Caribou/Buffalo

I'm still looking for the F-6, F-7 and F-10 (The F-7 is a very interesting story)


Yep, about 1 minute later...you were probably already typing while I debated editing, or posting anew (I thought you were busy on the other thread...).

Oh, don't tell the A.F., but I saw a few Mohawks with rockets mounted in "I" Corps, Vietnam at Phu Bai....probably deniably, but they was there. Wink

The F-7 is NOT the F107, is it....that Super Sabre with the intake mounted dorsally over the cockpit (which was ugly as sin, but reportedly a good airplane...but lost out to two engines in the F-4)?
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Jinx
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 186
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 11:00 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- bsmart
- Jinx
- bsmart
The Air Force got the F-5 for the fighter version of the T-38



Was this before or after the U.S. Navy used the designation F5D-1 for their prototype fighter (also known as the Skylancer)?
The F5D had lost out to the F8U before the 'merger' of designations.



Thank you very much for that.

I could say something about the merits of retiring numbers after they are used (hey, it works in baseball!).....but i doubt it would do any good.

(And i guess that would have led to such designations as the M-14907 Abrams and the B-1661 Lancer.....)


- bsmart
This was one of those 'political decisions'. The F5D Skylancer. was a good fighter and seemed to have as much potential as the F8U Crusader. But Douglas at the time was building the F4D, AD, A3D, A4D, B-66 as well as a thriving Commercial business. Vought had no other business and there was some thought that it got the award to keep business spread around. Several years later the F8U-3 lost out to the F4H-1 and there were claims that with the successful F8U line still chugging along it was time to throw some Buisness in the direction of the struggling McDonnell company



And one could point out that neither McDonnell nor Douglas are still around (except for the bits that are buried in the bowels of Boeing, i mean).

And it looks like the practice of throwing the business around is still being followed, don't you think?

Of course, there aren't nearly so many aircraft manufacturers in the U.S., anymore.....so it makes sense to keep the survivors alive. However they have to do it.
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:34 am
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

"And one could point out that neither McDonnell nor Douglas are still around"

Lets see Vought isn't around, neither is Convair (well I guess as you put it 'buried in the bowels of Lockheed Martin' :-)) Lockheed & Martin have merged (and neither produce airplanes in the location they originally did) Republic is gone, North American disapeared in the bowels of somebody, Northrup & Grumman have merged but are hardly 'aircraft companies' anymore.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:40 am
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

Oh, don't tell the A.F., but I saw a few Mohawks with rockets mounted in "I" Corps, Vietnam at Phu Bai....probably deniably, but they was there. Wink

Those were just 'spotting rockets' right Smile to be used to mark the target so the real shooters could attack it I'm sure Smile

The F-7 is NOT the F107, is it....that Super Sabre with the intake mounted dorsally over the cockpit (which was ugly as sin, but reportedly a good airplane...but lost out to two engines in the F-4)?[/quote]

Actually the F-107 lost out to the F-105. Nope, I don't know of any USAF aircraft except the Phantom that were renumbered.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
DCCLarke
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 62

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 1:33 am
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

Bob, please check your private messages on the board.

Best,
David
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 1:40 am
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

I posted a list of 'M-numbers' earlier in this thread. I got it from the old list somewhile back (a year or so ago?) Does anyone remember who posted it to the list? Was it you Neil?

The reason I ask is a couple folks have asked if they can take it to other lists. I don't want to claim ownership just because I thought to save it as a text file. So if someone else remembers who posted it I would appreciate their coming forward so the proper compiler can get credit

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 1:57 am
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- bsmart
I posted a list of 'M-numbers' earlier in this thread. I got it from the old list somewhile back (a year or so ago?) Does anyone remember who posted it to the list? Was it you Neil?

The reason I ask is a couple folks have asked if they can take it to other lists. I don't want to claim ownership just because I thought to save it as a text file. So if someone else remembers who posted it I would appreciate their coming forward so the proper compiler can get credit


I can't answer your question, Bob, but I know that list (or one awfully like it) turned up elsewhere tonight when I was searching for something else:

www.mil-veh.org/archiv.../0507.html

BTW, it sure didn't look like 11 pages, single-spaced, until I printed it!
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 2 of 4
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum