±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 383
Total: 383
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: Home
05: Member Screenshots
06: Home
07: Home
08: Photo Gallery
09: Community Forums
10: Downloads
11: Home
12: Community Forums
13: Photo Gallery
14: Community Forums
15: Home
16: Community Forums
17: Home
18: Home
19: Community Forums
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Home
23: Downloads
24: Member Screenshots
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: News Archive
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Home
33: Community Forums
34: Home
35: Member Screenshots
36: Home
37: Home
38: Community Forums
39: Downloads
40: Member Screenshots
41: Downloads
42: Downloads
43: Community Forums
44: Downloads
45: Community Forums
46: Home
47: Home
48: Member Screenshots
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Member Screenshots
54: Home
55: News Archive
56: Photo Gallery
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Home
60: Downloads
61: Member Screenshots
62: Community Forums
63: Photo Gallery
64: News
65: Community Forums
66: Photo Gallery
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Downloads
74: Member Screenshots
75: Member Screenshots
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Home
79: Photo Gallery
80: Home
81: Community Forums
82: Member Screenshots
83: Home
84: Home
85: Home
86: Home
87: Community Forums
88: Member Screenshots
89: Photo Gallery
90: Photo Gallery
91: Community Forums
92: Home
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Photo Gallery
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Downloads
100: Home
101: Home
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Member Screenshots
105: Home
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Downloads
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Home
112: Photo Gallery
113: Community Forums
114: Member Screenshots
115: Home
116: Downloads
117: Member Screenshots
118: Community Forums
119: Photo Gallery
120: Member Screenshots
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Home
124: Community Forums
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: Home
129: Community Forums
130: Home
131: Community Forums
132: Home
133: Home
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: Home
142: Community Forums
143: Home
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Member Screenshots
149: News Archive
150: Community Forums
151: Statistics
152: Downloads
153: Photo Gallery
154: Home
155: Home
156: Member Screenshots
157: Community Forums
158: Home
159: Member Screenshots
160: Community Forums
161: Home
162: Member Screenshots
163: Downloads
164: Home
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Home
168: News Archive
169: Member Screenshots
170: Community Forums
171: Home
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Home
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Home
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: Community Forums
182: Downloads
183: Home
184: Home
185: Home
186: Community Forums
187: News
188: Home
189: Community Forums
190: Home
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: News
194: News
195: Community Forums
196: News
197: Community Forums
198: Member Screenshots
199: Community Forums
200: Home
201: Community Forums
202: Home
203: Downloads
204: Home
205: Photo Gallery
206: Home
207: Community Forums
208: Home
209: Home
210: News
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Photo Gallery
214: Home
215: Home
216: News
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Home
222: Community Forums
223: Downloads
224: Home
225: Downloads
226: Home
227: Home
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Member Screenshots
232: Home
233: Statistics
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Photo Gallery
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Home
240: Community Forums
241: Member Screenshots
242: Community Forums
243: Member Screenshots
244: Community Forums
245: Home
246: Home
247: Home
248: Home
249: Home
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Home
253: Member Screenshots
254: Home
255: News Archive
256: Community Forums
257: Home
258: Home
259: Home
260: Home
261: Home
262: News Archive
263: Member Screenshots
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Photo Gallery
267: Community Forums
268: Home
269: Member Screenshots
270: Home
271: Home
272: Community Forums
273: Member Screenshots
274: Home
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: Member Screenshots
279: Community Forums
280: Home
281: News Archive
282: Photo Gallery
283: Home
284: Member Screenshots
285: Member Screenshots
286: Community Forums
287: Photo Gallery
288: Statistics
289: Home
290: News Archive
291: Member Screenshots
292: Home
293: Search
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Downloads
299: Community Forums
300: Home
301: Member Screenshots
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Home
305: Community Forums
306: Home
307: Home
308: Community Forums
309: Home
310: Member Screenshots
311: Home
312: Home
313: Home
314: Community Forums
315: Home
316: Home
317: Home
318: Home
319: Home
320: News Archive
321: Home
322: Member Screenshots
323: Home
324: Member Screenshots
325: Home
326: Home
327: Community Forums
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: News Archive
331: Member Screenshots
332: Community Forums
333: Member Screenshots
334: Community Forums
335: Downloads
336: Downloads
337: Community Forums
338: Home
339: Home
340: Community Forums
341: Photo Gallery
342: Community Forums
343: Community Forums
344: Community Forums
345: Photo Gallery
346: Community Forums
347: News Archive
348: Home
349: Community Forums
350: Downloads
351: Community Forums
352: Member Screenshots
353: Home
354: Community Forums
355: News Archive
356: Member Screenshots
357: Community Forums
358: Statistics
359: Member Screenshots
360: Community Forums
361: Downloads
362: Community Forums
363: Community Forums
364: Community Forums
365: Home
366: Community Forums
367: Home
368: News Archive
369: Community Forums
370: Community Forums
371: Home
372: Community Forums
373: Community Forums
374: Community Forums
375: Home
376: Member Screenshots
377: Community Forums
378: Community Forums
379: Home
380: Photo Gallery
381: Community Forums
382: Community Forums
383: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
T-28 & T95
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:37 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- bsmart
C-8 I think was another Army plane (The DeHaviland Buffalo?)


Oooh, Oooh!...I know that one!

"The first four aircraft produced in 1964-65 were delivered to the U.S. Army under the designation YAC-2 (later changed to CV-7A and subsequently C-8A) but, as already stated, no American production order followed."

...and you will sometimes see the designation DHC-5A, but as it wasn't adopted, this is sort of a "limbo" name....


...and the A.F. F110 name for a Phantom was the "Spectre", but Ernst Blofeld put a stop to that with a blackmail scheme involving a satellite equipped with what he called a "Laser"....
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:48 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- Doug_Kibbey
- bsmart
C-8 I think was another Army plane (The DeHaviland Buffalo?)


Oooh, Oooh!...I know that one!

"The first four aircraft produced in 1964-65 were delivered to the U.S. Army under the designation YAC-2 (later changed to CV-7A and subsequently C-8A) but, as already stated, no American production order followed."

...and you will sometimes see the designation DHC-5A, but as it wasn't adopted, this is sort of a "limbo" name....
I think the C-8 was coming around just about the time of the 'Key West Agreement' that limited the Army to no 'large' or 'combat' Fixed wing Aircraft. The C-7 caribou was put as the armies upper limit and the C-8 bing a little larger would have had to be an Air Force Aircraft after the agreement. The Air Force said 'We have the old C-123s and the new C-130s we don't need another cargo plane to take dollars away from fighters and bombers. Oh and by the way don't even think about hanging guns, rockets or bombs on the O-2 Mohawks you have, even if they have six hardpoints under the wings and are stressed for tactical manouvers.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Jinx
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 186
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:40 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- bsmart
The Air Force got the F-5 for the fighter version of the T-38



Was this before or after the U.S. Navy used the designation F5D-1 for their prototype fighter (also known as the Skylancer)?
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:02 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- Jinx
- bsmart
The Air Force got the F-5 for the fighter version of the T-38



Was this before or after the U.S. Navy used the designation F5D-1 for their prototype fighter (also known as the Skylancer)?
The F5D had lost out to the F8U before the 'merger' of designations.

This was one of those 'poliitical decisions'. The F5D Skylancer. was a good fighter and seemed to have as much potential as the F8U Crusader. But Douglas at the time was building the F4D, AD, A3D, A4D, B-66 as well as a thriving Commercial business. Vought had no other business and there was some thought that it got the award to keep business spread around. Several years later the F8U-3 lost out to the F4H-1 and there were claims that with the successful F8U line still chugging along it was time to throw some Buisness in the direction of the struggling McDonnell company

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])


Last edited by bsmart on Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:29 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:16 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

All this for that little question! Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:20 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- JeffStringer
All this for that little question! lol
And when as the small scale of a question ever limited the amount we can stretch the thread Smile

Actually I just found a mistake in my list of Fighters!

The F-7 was not the F7U Cutlass.

Quiz Bonus 2 - What plane became the F-7?

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])


Last edited by bsmart on Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:31 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:30 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- Doug_Kibbey

...and the A.F. F110 name for a Phantom was the "Spectre", but Ernst Blofeld put a stop to that with a blackmail scheme involving a satellite equipped with what he called a "Laser"....


...Hey!...where's my extra credit for the F110 bonus question?!
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:35 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- Doug_Kibbey
- Doug_Kibbey

...and the A.F. F110 name for a Phantom was the "Spectre", but Ernst Blofeld put a stop to that with a blackmail scheme involving a satellite equipped with what he called a "Laser"....


...Hey!...where's my extra credit for the F110 bonus question?!
My apologies I didn't see the F110 part of your response when I was scanning the list before leaving work (did you add it to the C-7/C-8 answer later ?)

You get credit for the correct answer for the name Spectre. Also bonus points for the clarification of the Caribou/Buffalo

I'm still looking for the F-6, F-7 and F-10 (The F-7 is a very interesting story)

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])


Last edited by bsmart on Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:31 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:49 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- bsmart
- Doug_Kibbey
- Doug_Kibbey

...and the A.F. F110 name for a Phantom was the "Spectre", but Ernst Blofeld put a stop to that with a blackmail scheme involving a satellite equipped with what he called a "Laser"....


...Hey!...where's my extra credit for the F110 bonus question?!
My apologies I didn't see the F110 part of yoiur response when I was scanning the list before leaving work (did you add it to the C-7/C-8 answer later ?)

You get credit for the correct answer for the name Spectre. Also bonus points for the clarification of the Caribou/Buffalo

I'm still looking for the F-6, F-7 and F-10 (The F-7 is a very interesting story)


Yep, about 1 minute later...you were probably already typing while I debated editing, or posting anew (I thought you were busy on the other thread...).

Oh, don't tell the A.F., but I saw a few Mohawks with rockets mounted in "I" Corps, Vietnam at Phu Bai....probably deniably, but they was there. Wink

The F-7 is NOT the F107, is it....that Super Sabre with the intake mounted dorsally over the cockpit (which was ugly as sin, but reportedly a good airplane...but lost out to two engines in the F-4)?
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Jinx
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 186
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 11:00 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- bsmart
- Jinx
- bsmart
The Air Force got the F-5 for the fighter version of the T-38



Was this before or after the U.S. Navy used the designation F5D-1 for their prototype fighter (also known as the Skylancer)?
The F5D had lost out to the F8U before the 'merger' of designations.



Thank you very much for that.

I could say something about the merits of retiring numbers after they are used (hey, it works in baseball!).....but i doubt it would do any good.

(And i guess that would have led to such designations as the M-14907 Abrams and the B-1661 Lancer.....)


- bsmart
This was one of those 'political decisions'. The F5D Skylancer. was a good fighter and seemed to have as much potential as the F8U Crusader. But Douglas at the time was building the F4D, AD, A3D, A4D, B-66 as well as a thriving Commercial business. Vought had no other business and there was some thought that it got the award to keep business spread around. Several years later the F8U-3 lost out to the F4H-1 and there were claims that with the successful F8U line still chugging along it was time to throw some Buisness in the direction of the struggling McDonnell company



And one could point out that neither McDonnell nor Douglas are still around (except for the bits that are buried in the bowels of Boeing, i mean).

And it looks like the practice of throwing the business around is still being followed, don't you think?

Of course, there aren't nearly so many aircraft manufacturers in the U.S., anymore.....so it makes sense to keep the survivors alive. However they have to do it.
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:34 am
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

"And one could point out that neither McDonnell nor Douglas are still around"

Lets see Vought isn't around, neither is Convair (well I guess as you put it 'buried in the bowels of Lockheed Martin' :-)) Lockheed & Martin have merged (and neither produce airplanes in the location they originally did) Republic is gone, North American disapeared in the bowels of somebody, Northrup & Grumman have merged but are hardly 'aircraft companies' anymore.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:40 am
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

Oh, don't tell the A.F., but I saw a few Mohawks with rockets mounted in "I" Corps, Vietnam at Phu Bai....probably deniably, but they was there. Wink

Those were just 'spotting rockets' right Smile to be used to mark the target so the real shooters could attack it I'm sure Smile

The F-7 is NOT the F107, is it....that Super Sabre with the intake mounted dorsally over the cockpit (which was ugly as sin, but reportedly a good airplane...but lost out to two engines in the F-4)?[/quote]

Actually the F-107 lost out to the F-105. Nope, I don't know of any USAF aircraft except the Phantom that were renumbered.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
DCCLarke
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 62

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 1:33 am
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

Bob, please check your private messages on the board.

Best,
David
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 1:40 am
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

I posted a list of 'M-numbers' earlier in this thread. I got it from the old list somewhile back (a year or so ago?) Does anyone remember who posted it to the list? Was it you Neil?

The reason I ask is a couple folks have asked if they can take it to other lists. I don't want to claim ownership just because I thought to save it as a text file. So if someone else remembers who posted it I would appreciate their coming forward so the proper compiler can get credit

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 1:57 am
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- bsmart
I posted a list of 'M-numbers' earlier in this thread. I got it from the old list somewhile back (a year or so ago?) Does anyone remember who posted it to the list? Was it you Neil?

The reason I ask is a couple folks have asked if they can take it to other lists. I don't want to claim ownership just because I thought to save it as a text file. So if someone else remembers who posted it I would appreciate their coming forward so the proper compiler can get credit


I can't answer your question, Bob, but I know that list (or one awfully like it) turned up elsewhere tonight when I was searching for something else:

www.mil-veh.org/archiv.../0507.html

BTW, it sure didn't look like 11 pages, single-spaced, until I printed it!
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 2 of 4
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum