±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 340
Total: 340
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Home
03: Home
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Home
07: Statistics
08: Community Forums
09: Home
10: Home
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Photo Gallery
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Downloads
18: Community Forums
19: Photo Gallery
20: Community Forums
21: Home
22: Community Forums
23: Home
24: Home
25: Home
26: News Archive
27: Community Forums
28: Home
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Photo Gallery
32: Community Forums
33: Home
34: Home
35: Community Forums
36: LinkToUs
37: Home
38: Downloads
39: Community Forums
40: Home
41: Search
42: Home
43: Home
44: Statistics
45: Community Forums
46: Home
47: Home
48: Home
49: Home
50: Home
51: Community Forums
52: Home
53: Home
54: Home
55: Community Forums
56: Home
57: Home
58: Community Forums
59: Home
60: Photo Gallery
61: Home
62: Home
63: Home
64: Home
65: Home
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Home
70: Community Forums
71: Home
72: Your Account
73: Community Forums
74: Home
75: Community Forums
76: Home
77: Community Forums
78: Statistics
79: Home
80: Home
81: Home
82: Downloads
83: Community Forums
84: News Archive
85: Home
86: Community Forums
87: Home
88: Home
89: Home
90: Community Forums
91: Home
92: Home
93: Home
94: Home
95: Home
96: Home
97: Home
98: Community Forums
99: Community Forums
100: News Archive
101: Downloads
102: Community Forums
103: Home
104: Home
105: Home
106: Community Forums
107: Home
108: Downloads
109: Photo Gallery
110: Community Forums
111: Home
112: Community Forums
113: Home
114: Home
115: Community Forums
116: Home
117: Home
118: Home
119: Home
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Home
123: Photo Gallery
124: Community Forums
125: Downloads
126: Community Forums
127: Home
128: Community Forums
129: Home
130: Home
131: Your Account
132: Community Forums
133: Downloads
134: Home
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Home
138: Community Forums
139: Home
140: Home
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Home
144: Home
145: Home
146: Home
147: Community Forums
148: Home
149: Home
150: Home
151: Home
152: Home
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Home
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Member Screenshots
163: Community Forums
164: Home
165: Community Forums
166: Home
167: Home
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Home
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: News Archive
174: Home
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Your Account
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: Home
182: Home
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Photo Gallery
187: Community Forums
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: Community Forums
191: Home
192: Community Forums
193: Home
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Photo Gallery
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums
204: Photo Gallery
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Home
209: Community Forums
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: LinkToUs
213: Home
214: Home
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Home
219: Community Forums
220: Home
221: Community Forums
222: Home
223: Community Forums
224: Community Forums
225: Photo Gallery
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: Home
230: Community Forums
231: Photo Gallery
232: Home
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Home
241: Home
242: Photo Gallery
243: Downloads
244: Community Forums
245: Home
246: Home
247: Home
248: Community Forums
249: Home
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Photo Gallery
253: News
254: Community Forums
255: Home
256: Community Forums
257: Community Forums
258: Member Screenshots
259: Downloads
260: Home
261: Community Forums
262: Home
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Home
268: Community Forums
269: News Archive
270: Home
271: Community Forums
272: Community Forums
273: Home
274: Home
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: Home
279: Photo Gallery
280: Community Forums
281: Home
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Home
286: Home
287: Community Forums
288: Community Forums
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Community Forums
293: Community Forums
294: Home
295: News
296: Home
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Community Forums
300: Downloads
301: Your Account
302: Photo Gallery
303: Photo Gallery
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Member Screenshots
307: Downloads
308: News Archive
309: Home
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Community Forums
313: Statistics
314: Community Forums
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Home
318: Home
319: Member Screenshots
320: Home
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Community Forums
324: Community Forums
325: Community Forums
326: Downloads
327: Community Forums
328: Community Forums
329: Search
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: Community Forums
333: Downloads
334: News
335: Community Forums
336: Community Forums
337: Home
338: Photo Gallery
339: LinkToUs
340: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
T-28 & T95
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:37 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- bsmart
C-8 I think was another Army plane (The DeHaviland Buffalo?)


Oooh, Oooh!...I know that one!

"The first four aircraft produced in 1964-65 were delivered to the U.S. Army under the designation YAC-2 (later changed to CV-7A and subsequently C-8A) but, as already stated, no American production order followed."

...and you will sometimes see the designation DHC-5A, but as it wasn't adopted, this is sort of a "limbo" name....


...and the A.F. F110 name for a Phantom was the "Spectre", but Ernst Blofeld put a stop to that with a blackmail scheme involving a satellite equipped with what he called a "Laser"....
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:48 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- Doug_Kibbey
- bsmart
C-8 I think was another Army plane (The DeHaviland Buffalo?)


Oooh, Oooh!...I know that one!

"The first four aircraft produced in 1964-65 were delivered to the U.S. Army under the designation YAC-2 (later changed to CV-7A and subsequently C-8A) but, as already stated, no American production order followed."

...and you will sometimes see the designation DHC-5A, but as it wasn't adopted, this is sort of a "limbo" name....
I think the C-8 was coming around just about the time of the 'Key West Agreement' that limited the Army to no 'large' or 'combat' Fixed wing Aircraft. The C-7 caribou was put as the armies upper limit and the C-8 bing a little larger would have had to be an Air Force Aircraft after the agreement. The Air Force said 'We have the old C-123s and the new C-130s we don't need another cargo plane to take dollars away from fighters and bombers. Oh and by the way don't even think about hanging guns, rockets or bombs on the O-2 Mohawks you have, even if they have six hardpoints under the wings and are stressed for tactical manouvers.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Jinx
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 186
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:40 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- bsmart
The Air Force got the F-5 for the fighter version of the T-38



Was this before or after the U.S. Navy used the designation F5D-1 for their prototype fighter (also known as the Skylancer)?
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:02 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- Jinx
- bsmart
The Air Force got the F-5 for the fighter version of the T-38



Was this before or after the U.S. Navy used the designation F5D-1 for their prototype fighter (also known as the Skylancer)?
The F5D had lost out to the F8U before the 'merger' of designations.

This was one of those 'poliitical decisions'. The F5D Skylancer. was a good fighter and seemed to have as much potential as the F8U Crusader. But Douglas at the time was building the F4D, AD, A3D, A4D, B-66 as well as a thriving Commercial business. Vought had no other business and there was some thought that it got the award to keep business spread around. Several years later the F8U-3 lost out to the F4H-1 and there were claims that with the successful F8U line still chugging along it was time to throw some Buisness in the direction of the struggling McDonnell company

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])


Last edited by bsmart on Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:29 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:16 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

All this for that little question! Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:20 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- JeffStringer
All this for that little question! lol
And when as the small scale of a question ever limited the amount we can stretch the thread Smile

Actually I just found a mistake in my list of Fighters!

The F-7 was not the F7U Cutlass.

Quiz Bonus 2 - What plane became the F-7?

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])


Last edited by bsmart on Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:31 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:30 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- Doug_Kibbey

...and the A.F. F110 name for a Phantom was the "Spectre", but Ernst Blofeld put a stop to that with a blackmail scheme involving a satellite equipped with what he called a "Laser"....


...Hey!...where's my extra credit for the F110 bonus question?!
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:35 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- Doug_Kibbey
- Doug_Kibbey

...and the A.F. F110 name for a Phantom was the "Spectre", but Ernst Blofeld put a stop to that with a blackmail scheme involving a satellite equipped with what he called a "Laser"....


...Hey!...where's my extra credit for the F110 bonus question?!
My apologies I didn't see the F110 part of your response when I was scanning the list before leaving work (did you add it to the C-7/C-8 answer later ?)

You get credit for the correct answer for the name Spectre. Also bonus points for the clarification of the Caribou/Buffalo

I'm still looking for the F-6, F-7 and F-10 (The F-7 is a very interesting story)

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])


Last edited by bsmart on Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:31 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:49 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- bsmart
- Doug_Kibbey
- Doug_Kibbey

...and the A.F. F110 name for a Phantom was the "Spectre", but Ernst Blofeld put a stop to that with a blackmail scheme involving a satellite equipped with what he called a "Laser"....


...Hey!...where's my extra credit for the F110 bonus question?!
My apologies I didn't see the F110 part of yoiur response when I was scanning the list before leaving work (did you add it to the C-7/C-8 answer later ?)

You get credit for the correct answer for the name Spectre. Also bonus points for the clarification of the Caribou/Buffalo

I'm still looking for the F-6, F-7 and F-10 (The F-7 is a very interesting story)


Yep, about 1 minute later...you were probably already typing while I debated editing, or posting anew (I thought you were busy on the other thread...).

Oh, don't tell the A.F., but I saw a few Mohawks with rockets mounted in "I" Corps, Vietnam at Phu Bai....probably deniably, but they was there. Wink

The F-7 is NOT the F107, is it....that Super Sabre with the intake mounted dorsally over the cockpit (which was ugly as sin, but reportedly a good airplane...but lost out to two engines in the F-4)?
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Jinx
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 186
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 11:00 pm
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- bsmart
- Jinx
- bsmart
The Air Force got the F-5 for the fighter version of the T-38



Was this before or after the U.S. Navy used the designation F5D-1 for their prototype fighter (also known as the Skylancer)?
The F5D had lost out to the F8U before the 'merger' of designations.



Thank you very much for that.

I could say something about the merits of retiring numbers after they are used (hey, it works in baseball!).....but i doubt it would do any good.

(And i guess that would have led to such designations as the M-14907 Abrams and the B-1661 Lancer.....)


- bsmart
This was one of those 'political decisions'. The F5D Skylancer. was a good fighter and seemed to have as much potential as the F8U Crusader. But Douglas at the time was building the F4D, AD, A3D, A4D, B-66 as well as a thriving Commercial business. Vought had no other business and there was some thought that it got the award to keep business spread around. Several years later the F8U-3 lost out to the F4H-1 and there were claims that with the successful F8U line still chugging along it was time to throw some Buisness in the direction of the struggling McDonnell company



And one could point out that neither McDonnell nor Douglas are still around (except for the bits that are buried in the bowels of Boeing, i mean).

And it looks like the practice of throwing the business around is still being followed, don't you think?

Of course, there aren't nearly so many aircraft manufacturers in the U.S., anymore.....so it makes sense to keep the survivors alive. However they have to do it.
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:34 am
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

"And one could point out that neither McDonnell nor Douglas are still around"

Lets see Vought isn't around, neither is Convair (well I guess as you put it 'buried in the bowels of Lockheed Martin' :-)) Lockheed & Martin have merged (and neither produce airplanes in the location they originally did) Republic is gone, North American disapeared in the bowels of somebody, Northrup & Grumman have merged but are hardly 'aircraft companies' anymore.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:40 am
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

Oh, don't tell the A.F., but I saw a few Mohawks with rockets mounted in "I" Corps, Vietnam at Phu Bai....probably deniably, but they was there. Wink

Those were just 'spotting rockets' right Smile to be used to mark the target so the real shooters could attack it I'm sure Smile

The F-7 is NOT the F107, is it....that Super Sabre with the intake mounted dorsally over the cockpit (which was ugly as sin, but reportedly a good airplane...but lost out to two engines in the F-4)?[/quote]

Actually the F-107 lost out to the F-105. Nope, I don't know of any USAF aircraft except the Phantom that were renumbered.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
DCCLarke
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 62

PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 1:33 am
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

Bob, please check your private messages on the board.

Best,
David
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 1:40 am
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

I posted a list of 'M-numbers' earlier in this thread. I got it from the old list somewhile back (a year or so ago?) Does anyone remember who posted it to the list? Was it you Neil?

The reason I ask is a couple folks have asked if they can take it to other lists. I don't want to claim ownership just because I thought to save it as a text file. So if someone else remembers who posted it I would appreciate their coming forward so the proper compiler can get credit

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 1:57 am
Post subject: Re: T-28 & T95

- bsmart
I posted a list of 'M-numbers' earlier in this thread. I got it from the old list somewhile back (a year or so ago?) Does anyone remember who posted it to the list? Was it you Neil?

The reason I ask is a couple folks have asked if they can take it to other lists. I don't want to claim ownership just because I thought to save it as a text file. So if someone else remembers who posted it I would appreciate their coming forward so the proper compiler can get credit


I can't answer your question, Bob, but I know that list (or one awfully like it) turned up elsewhere tonight when I was searching for something else:

www.mil-veh.org/archiv.../0507.html

BTW, it sure didn't look like 11 pages, single-spaced, until I printed it!
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 2 of 4
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum