±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 407
Total: 407
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Home
03: Home
04: Your Account
05: Community Forums
06: Home
07: Home
08: Photo Gallery
09: Home
10: Home
11: Home
12: Home
13: Photo Gallery
14: Home
15: Photo Gallery
16: Community Forums
17: News Archive
18: Community Forums
19: Downloads
20: Member Screenshots
21: Home
22: Community Forums
23: Home
24: Home
25: Home
26: Downloads
27: Community Forums
28: Member Screenshots
29: Community Forums
30: Statistics
31: Home
32: Home
33: Member Screenshots
34: Home
35: Community Forums
36: Home
37: Statistics
38: Photo Gallery
39: Home
40: Home
41: Downloads
42: Your Account
43: Home
44: News
45: Home
46: Home
47: Photo Gallery
48: Contact
49: Photo Gallery
50: Downloads
51: Home
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Member Screenshots
55: Home
56: Member Screenshots
57: Photo Gallery
58: Home
59: Home
60: Photo Gallery
61: Home
62: Home
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Home
66: Search
67: News Archive
68: Photo Gallery
69: Home
70: Community Forums
71: Home
72: Home
73: Home
74: Home
75: Community Forums
76: Home
77: Home
78: Home
79: Home
80: Home
81: Community Forums
82: Home
83: Community Forums
84: Member Screenshots
85: Downloads
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: News
89: News
90: Home
91: Community Forums
92: Home
93: Community Forums
94: Home
95: Community Forums
96: Member Screenshots
97: Home
98: Community Forums
99: News
100: Photo Gallery
101: Home
102: Community Forums
103: Home
104: Community Forums
105: Home
106: Downloads
107: Home
108: Home
109: Member Screenshots
110: Photo Gallery
111: Downloads
112: Home
113: Member Screenshots
114: Photo Gallery
115: Photo Gallery
116: Member Screenshots
117: Home
118: Home
119: Photo Gallery
120: Photo Gallery
121: Photo Gallery
122: Photo Gallery
123: Home
124: Photo Gallery
125: Downloads
126: Statistics
127: Home
128: Home
129: Home
130: Downloads
131: Photo Gallery
132: Home
133: Home
134: Photo Gallery
135: Home
136: Photo Gallery
137: Photo Gallery
138: Photo Gallery
139: Photo Gallery
140: Home
141: Home
142: Photo Gallery
143: Downloads
144: Member Screenshots
145: Photo Gallery
146: Photo Gallery
147: Your Account
148: Home
149: Home
150: Community Forums
151: Home
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Home
156: Home
157: Home
158: Photo Gallery
159: Home
160: Photo Gallery
161: Home
162: Member Screenshots
163: Community Forums
164: Downloads
165: Home
166: Home
167: Community Forums
168: Home
169: Community Forums
170: Home
171: Community Forums
172: Home
173: Home
174: Home
175: Home
176: Community Forums
177: Downloads
178: Home
179: Community Forums
180: Home
181: Member Screenshots
182: Home
183: Downloads
184: Home
185: Home
186: Member Screenshots
187: Photo Gallery
188: Community Forums
189: Home
190: Photo Gallery
191: Community Forums
192: Downloads
193: Photo Gallery
194: Community Forums
195: Photo Gallery
196: Home
197: Photo Gallery
198: Home
199: Member Screenshots
200: Community Forums
201: Home
202: Home
203: Photo Gallery
204: Downloads
205: Home
206: Community Forums
207: Photo Gallery
208: Home
209: Downloads
210: Home
211: Home
212: Community Forums
213: Home
214: Photo Gallery
215: Home
216: Home
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Home
221: Home
222: Home
223: Home
224: Home
225: Member Screenshots
226: Photo Gallery
227: Home
228: Home
229: Photo Gallery
230: Photo Gallery
231: News Archive
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Downloads
236: Home
237: Home
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Member Screenshots
241: Home
242: Member Screenshots
243: Community Forums
244: Home
245: Community Forums
246: Home
247: Member Screenshots
248: Photo Gallery
249: Home
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Home
253: Downloads
254: Community Forums
255: Photo Gallery
256: Home
257: Home
258: Home
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Home
262: Photo Gallery
263: Community Forums
264: Home
265: Home
266: Home
267: Home
268: Community Forums
269: Home
270: Home
271: Home
272: Photo Gallery
273: Home
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Member Screenshots
277: Photo Gallery
278: Photo Gallery
279: Member Screenshots
280: Community Forums
281: Home
282: Community Forums
283: Home
284: Downloads
285: Photo Gallery
286: Home
287: Downloads
288: Home
289: Home
290: Community Forums
291: Home
292: Home
293: Community Forums
294: Member Screenshots
295: Community Forums
296: Home
297: News Archive
298: Home
299: Home
300: Community Forums
301: Home
302: Member Screenshots
303: Photo Gallery
304: Member Screenshots
305: Member Screenshots
306: Statistics
307: Home
308: Photo Gallery
309: Home
310: Tell a Friend
311: Community Forums
312: Home
313: Home
314: Community Forums
315: Photo Gallery
316: Downloads
317: Member Screenshots
318: Statistics
319: Home
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Downloads
324: Home
325: Home
326: Photo Gallery
327: Tell a Friend
328: Home
329: Community Forums
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: Home
333: News Archive
334: Home
335: Statistics
336: Home
337: Community Forums
338: News Archive
339: Photo Gallery
340: Community Forums
341: Home
342: Community Forums
343: Home
344: Your Account
345: Home
346: Home
347: Home
348: Home
349: Photo Gallery
350: Photo Gallery
351: Home
352: Photo Gallery
353: Home
354: Photo Gallery
355: News
356: Photo Gallery
357: Home
358: Home
359: Community Forums
360: Photo Gallery
361: Community Forums
362: Member Screenshots
363: Home
364: Photo Gallery
365: Home
366: News
367: Photo Gallery
368: Home
369: Home
370: Downloads
371: Home
372: Home
373: Photo Gallery
374: News Archive
375: Downloads
376: Home
377: Home
378: Photo Gallery
379: Downloads
380: Home
381: Statistics
382: Photo Gallery
383: Community Forums
384: Home
385: Community Forums
386: Home
387: Photo Gallery
388: Member Screenshots
389: Community Forums
390: Community Forums
391: Home
392: Home
393: Community Forums
394: Home
395: Member Screenshots
396: Home
397: Community Forums
398: Member Screenshots
399: Member Screenshots
400: Photo Gallery
401: Community Forums
402: Community Forums
403: Home
404: Home
405: Downloads
406: Community Forums
407: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
off topic Vietnam
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:28 am
Post subject: off topic Vietnam

off topic Vietnam, AR-15

those who remember me on this forum know that i am always digging for more info...

does anyone know of aar's or any documentation that gives specifics for the early failures of the M16, primarily unit specific aar's, etc.

my father, uncle rich, and uncle dan were in nam between 65-67, they never carried the mattel product.

shawn
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 1:34 pm
Post subject: Re: off topic Vietnam

Hi Shawn...glad you found us!

One source to get your hands on (that isn't just internet ramblings), is the Ichord Subcommittee report of October '67. 600 pages of bureaucratese mingled with useful data.

For a reasonable and short list of the early issues, the Wikipedia history of the M-16 isn't bad either. The stories you are most likely to hear are of propellant fouling from ball powder, lack of cleaning kits with early issued weapons, bolt failures, etc.

My own personal experience, which came later (beginning in '71) was that decently maintained, the A1's were highly reliable and effective in all but heavy bushy (like bamboo stands). I never experienced a failure to function in the field with an A1, and I had three in VN (and the ones up north were subjected to the wettest conditions you normally associate with anyplace other than the delta). Nor do I recall others in my unit having issues with it. Roy's experience may be different, maybe he'll chime in.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 2:06 pm
Post subject: Re: off topic Vietnam

Hey Shawn

I've been doing a lot of USMC Command Chronology reading lately, for obvious reasons, known only to .....anyway

There are some references to field testing a number of 'Stoner' weapons, but I wasn't interested in that so not sure what the reference is for.

I'll dig thru and see what that is all about. I'll let you know.

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 3:31 pm
Post subject: Re: off topic Vietnam

From my reading M16's early trouble was mostly with the ammo. The brass casings had to be heat-treated or the round would jam in the gun. One Vietnam memoir I read had the author rummaging throughall the unit's stockpile of newly acquired 5.56 ammo and throwing out any rounds he found that didn't have the blue-ish tinge of heat treating on it. Apparently that solved the problem for his unit.
Back to top
View user's profile
David_Reasoner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 127
Location: South Central Kentucky
PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:01 pm
Post subject: Re: off topic Vietnam

Clinton Ezell's book, The Great Rifle Controversy should be required reading on the subject. It covers the development and selection process that led from the M1 Garand through the M14 to the M16. He covers a lot of the early service issues with the M16.

David
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 5:27 pm
Post subject: Re: off topic Vietnam

- mike_Duplessis
From my reading M16's early trouble was mostly with the ammo. The brass casings had to be heat-treated or the round would jam in the gun. One Vietnam memoir I read had the author rummaging throughall the unit's stockpile of newly acquired 5.56 ammo and throwing out any rounds he found that didn't have the blue-ish tinge of heat treating on it. Apparently that solved the problem for his unit.


I don't know if this is the one you are thinking about but "Tank Sergeant" by Zumbro comments on the bluish tinge as related to jamming problems

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 7:07 pm
Post subject: Re: off topic Vietnam

Yup, 'Tank Seargent'. I would've never remember the title on my own. That's the book where the author's career in Vietnam ended with a coconut falling on him!
Back to top
View user's profile
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 9:28 pm
Post subject: Re: off topic Vietnam

hey fellas, thanks for the leads and input (doug, mike, dontos, bob, david, et al)

i have heard the rumors from my dad about GI's who got overrun do to M16 failures, etc. but no real specifics about who or where or when, just vets saying "that is what i heard, the weapons jammed etc. etc etc, they lost their lives".
biggest fault voiced by uncle dan and ron was the inadequate .223 cartridge.

all i have run across so far is the same stuff dealing with the ammo and primer malfunctions, the testing and retesting studies, the initial procurements (us army da-11-199-amc-508) and many of the generals and staff and engineers and civilian pros and cons, blah, blah, blah all debating back and forth.

i just want to hear it from those who use it! if you can keep it clean it will work. .223 be damned but it will work.

i know that the 1st air cav and the 173rd initially deployed with the M16 but havent found any accounts of combat losses due to M16 malfunctions, etc. the 1st air cav had the 16's that had the forward bolt assist (they were not the M16A1's, earlier 16's with many of the improvements though).

anyway, i guess i have been more interested in this historical trivia because i just bought an AR-15 with the early upper and lower receivers...

thanks,
shawn
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Cloudy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 06, 2006
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 9:46 pm
Post subject: Re: off topic Vietnam

I believe that the problem was corrosion of the chamber and barrel brought about by a switch in propellants. This was cured by chroming said areas and adding a forward assist to help chamber rounds when necessary.
Back to top
View user's profile
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 9:46 pm
Post subject: Re: off topic Vietnam

A semi-related anecdote:

Let's not forget the 'Jessica Lynch' affair started when her M16 jammed the first time she tried to use it during the Iraq invasion. I've heard some comments along the line of "Yeh, that National Guard unit never did maintain their weapons properly", which sounds a bit like blaming the victim. Crying or Very sad

One obvious change from the original M16 is the little protrusion you can see sticking out of the right side of the reciever at an angle. If a round fails to chamber properly you're supposed to pound the whatchacallit with the heel of your hand to force the round into the chamber. A feature missing from the initial production gun.
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 9:53 pm
Post subject: Re: off topic Vietnam

- mike_Duplessis
A semi-related anecdote:

Let's not forget the 'Jessica Lynch' affair started when her M16 jammed the first time she tried to use it during the Iraq invasion. I've heard some comments along the line of "Yeh, that National Guard unit never did maintain their weapons properly", which sounds a bit like blaming the victim. Crying or Very sad

One obvious change from the original M16 is the little protrusion you can see sticking out of the right side of the reciever at an angle. If a round fails to chamber properly you're supposed to pound the whatchacallit with the heel of your hand to force the round into the chamber. A feature missing from the initial production gun.


That would be the "forward bolt assist" that Shawn referenced in his post. Might have been useful in the early days. I never once had occasion to use mine.

Re: The Jessica Lynch thing....I wouldn't rush to criticize the Guard necessarily, but definitely there were a number of units there that went into uncertain areas (is there another kind?) totally unprepared to fight if necessary. From all accounts, that unit was one of them...apart from poor communication, abyssmal navigation, and poor situational awareness on the part of everybody that was nominally "in charge"...when things turned ugly, they were unable to respond effectively. That's a leadership/training issue of the first order.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2069
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 7:20 am
Post subject: Re: off topic Vietnam

Doug is correct,
It was very frustrating knowing what happened and watching the media's attempt to make a new hero daily, when the facts were finally released the media hooked their horse to another wagon. BTW, 507th was an active component from what I recall from Bliss. Units for the most part were pretty well led, but there were some (small number) that were terrible, almost criminal in both Combat leadership and training. This was across the board, Active, NG or Reserve. Lack of training is a direct result of poor leadership, BOTTOM LINE. Your rifle is your personal weapon and if leadership cannot instill the value of maintaining and qualifying it in their troops the leadership needs to go away. Sorry, this subject gets to me. There is nothing wrong with the M16 today if put in the hands of a trained soldier. The old "I'm just a mechanic/cook/truck driver, what do I need to know that for?" just don't cut it.

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 10:19 am
Post subject: Re: off topic Vietnam

Hi Folks!

- Joe_D

It was very frustrating knowing what happened and watching the media's attempt to make a new hero daily, when the facts were finally released the media hooked their horse to another wagon. BTW, 507th was an active component from what I recall from Bliss.


Joe is correct. The 507th 'WAS' the maintance support company of a Patriot Missile Brigade based here at Ft. Bliss. The 'WAS' is due to current Unit of Action on going reorg.s. The company stood down a few months ago.

- Joe_D

Units for the most part were pretty well led, but there were some (small number) that were terrible, almost criminal in both Combat leadership and training. This was across the board, Active, NG or Reserve. Lack of training is a direct result of poor leadership, BOTTOM LINE. Your rifle is your personal weapon and if leadership cannot instill the value of maintaining and qualifying it in their troops the leadership needs to go away. Sorry, this subject gets to me. There is nothing wrong with the M16 today if put in the hands of a trained soldier. The old "I'm just a mechanic/cook/truck driver, what do I need to know that for?" just don't cut it.
Joe D


In a way Joe is right about the "what do I need to know that for", but I think in the case of the 507th it was not that simple. I feel that their problem was cause by the Brigade Headquarters. As supporters of the firing units (the Patriot Brty.s) all the focus was keeping the main shooters working. There was no time for individaul weapons training or convoy training. Don't forget, during Desert Shield, that truck with the male and female crew that drove into the fire fight for that town in NorthEast corner of Saudi Arabia and ended up as POWs for the rest of that action. That transport company was from Ft. Bliss also. No time for individual weapons training or map reading or convoy operations, everyone is needed to haul cargo back and forth to the training ranges for all the primary combat units.

Hi Shawn!

My take on the early version of the M-16.

This is another case of I think we could use Old Top and his input.

My 1st tour with the Marines. I was working in the DASC at Dong Ha when the Marines first recived that junk. Time frame was somewhere around a few months before the siege at Khe Son starting. A battalion from the 5th Marine Division had to take Hills 881 and 882. They went up those two mountains with that junk. The rumors that made it back to Dong Ha was that almost every Marine that died on those two hills was found with a jamed M-16. That most of those who made it to the top, had thrown their M-16s away and had picked up an AK-47 or SKS rifle. The one thing that I remember was we recevied a lot of med-evac requests during those two operations.

As for me, I DON'T TRUST an M-16 as far as it can move on it on. When I was in Vietnam during my second tour, I always carried a M-60 machine gun.

I would say that Joe is most likely right about the current version being OK.

Times changes, sometimes it is harder for people to change. In my case, the early version of the M-16 is still a sore spot with me.
Sgt, Scouts Out!

DASC - Direct Air Support Center

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 11:40 am
Post subject: Re: off topic Vietnam

- bsmart
- mike_Duplessis
From my reading M16's early trouble was mostly with the ammo. The brass casings had to be heat-treated or the round would jam in the gun. One Vietnam memoir I read had the author rummaging throughall the unit's stockpile of newly acquired 5.56 ammo and throwing out any rounds he found that didn't have the blue-ish tinge of heat treating on it. Apparently that solved the problem for his unit.


I don't know if this is the one you are thinking about but "Tank Sergeant" by Zumbro comments on the bluish tinge as related to jamming problems


Hi Folks!

Bluish tinge? First time I recall ever hearing that one.

Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
David_Reasoner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 127
Location: South Central Kentucky
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 1:34 pm
Post subject: Re: off topic Vietnam

- Cloudy
I believe that the problem was corrosion of the chamber and barrel brought about by a switch in propellants. This was cured by chroming said areas and adding a forward assist to help chamber rounds when necessary.


WW2 style ball powder tended to foul the gas tube. The M16 uses direct gas impingement on the bolt to cycle the action. The M1 and M14 use a piston type gas action more resistant to the effects of fouling. IIRC, they also had a gas adjustment in the system to compensate for fouling.

David
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 3
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum