±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 378
Total: 378
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Home
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Home
06: Home
07: Photo Gallery
08: Member Screenshots
09: Community Forums
10: Home
11: Home
12: Home
13: Community Forums
14: Member Screenshots
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Photo Gallery
20: Home
21: Community Forums
22: News Archive
23: Community Forums
24: Member Screenshots
25: Community Forums
26: Downloads
27: Member Screenshots
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Member Screenshots
31: Home
32: Member Screenshots
33: Community Forums
34: Home
35: Home
36: Home
37: Downloads
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Member Screenshots
42: Home
43: Home
44: Community Forums
45: Your Account
46: Downloads
47: Statistics
48: Member Screenshots
49: Member Screenshots
50: News Archive
51: LinkToUs
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Member Screenshots
56: Community Forums
57: Home
58: Community Forums
59: Home
60: Member Screenshots
61: Community Forums
62: Home
63: Home
64: Photo Gallery
65: Community Forums
66: Community Forums
67: Photo Gallery
68: Home
69: News Archive
70: Home
71: Home
72: Community Forums
73: Home
74: News Archive
75: Downloads
76: Home
77: Community Forums
78: Home
79: Member Screenshots
80: Search
81: Home
82: News Archive
83: Community Forums
84: Member Screenshots
85: Community Forums
86: Home
87: Community Forums
88: Home
89: Community Forums
90: Member Screenshots
91: Home
92: Home
93: Photo Gallery
94: Home
95: Photo Gallery
96: Community Forums
97: Home
98: Community Forums
99: Community Forums
100: Home
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Downloads
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Your Account
109: Photo Gallery
110: Home
111: Community Forums
112: Downloads
113: Member Screenshots
114: Member Screenshots
115: Photo Gallery
116: Community Forums
117: Home
118: Home
119: Downloads
120: Community Forums
121: Home
122: Home
123: Community Forums
124: Community Forums
125: Your Account
126: Community Forums
127: Home
128: Community Forums
129: Home
130: Home
131: Photo Gallery
132: News Archive
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Home
137: Downloads
138: Home
139: Photo Gallery
140: Photo Gallery
141: News Archive
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Home
145: Community Forums
146: Home
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Your Account
150: Downloads
151: Member Screenshots
152: Community Forums
153: Home
154: Home
155: Community Forums
156: Home
157: Community Forums
158: Home
159: Community Forums
160: Home
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Downloads
164: Home
165: Community Forums
166: Home
167: Community Forums
168: Home
169: Community Forums
170: Member Screenshots
171: Home
172: Downloads
173: News Archive
174: Community Forums
175: Home
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Home
180: Community Forums
181: Community Forums
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: Home
189: Community Forums
190: Community Forums
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Photo Gallery
194: Photo Gallery
195: Community Forums
196: Home
197: Community Forums
198: News Archive
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Member Screenshots
203: Home
204: Community Forums
205: Photo Gallery
206: Photo Gallery
207: Home
208: Community Forums
209: Home
210: Member Screenshots
211: Home
212: Home
213: Home
214: Community Forums
215: Photo Gallery
216: Home
217: News
218: Home
219: Community Forums
220: Home
221: Home
222: Home
223: News Archive
224: Community Forums
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Member Screenshots
228: Home
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Photo Gallery
232: Community Forums
233: Photo Gallery
234: Community Forums
235: Home
236: Home
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Home
240: Community Forums
241: Home
242: Community Forums
243: Home
244: Home
245: Home
246: Photo Gallery
247: News Archive
248: Home
249: Photo Gallery
250: Contact
251: Home
252: Home
253: News Archive
254: Home
255: Home
256: Home
257: Member Screenshots
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Home
261: Community Forums
262: Home
263: Home
264: Member Screenshots
265: News Archive
266: Home
267: Community Forums
268: Downloads
269: Contact
270: Photo Gallery
271: Home
272: Home
273: Your Account
274: Home
275: Photo Gallery
276: Home
277: Community Forums
278: Community Forums
279: Member Screenshots
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: Community Forums
283: Member Screenshots
284: Community Forums
285: Home
286: Community Forums
287: Community Forums
288: Member Screenshots
289: Community Forums
290: Photo Gallery
291: Home
292: Downloads
293: Photo Gallery
294: Home
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Home
300: Community Forums
301: Home
302: Member Screenshots
303: Member Screenshots
304: Downloads
305: Community Forums
306: Member Screenshots
307: Home
308: Community Forums
309: Downloads
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Community Forums
313: Photo Gallery
314: Community Forums
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: Home
320: Community Forums
321: Home
322: Home
323: Community Forums
324: Community Forums
325: Community Forums
326: Community Forums
327: Community Forums
328: Home
329: Downloads
330: News Archive
331: Member Screenshots
332: Tell a Friend
333: Community Forums
334: Home
335: News Archive
336: Community Forums
337: Downloads
338: Member Screenshots
339: Home
340: Community Forums
341: Community Forums
342: Home
343: Home
344: Photo Gallery
345: Community Forums
346: Tell a Friend
347: Downloads
348: Home
349: Home
350: Downloads
351: Home
352: Home
353: Home
354: Photo Gallery
355: Home
356: Member Screenshots
357: Community Forums
358: Community Forums
359: Community Forums
360: Community Forums
361: Community Forums
362: Home
363: Community Forums
364: Downloads
365: Photo Gallery
366: Community Forums
367: Community Forums
368: News Archive
369: Community Forums
370: Community Forums
371: Photo Gallery
372: Home
373: Member Screenshots
374: Home
375: Home
376: Community Forums
377: Community Forums
378: Photo Gallery

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Jens M-53 Howitzer
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 12:19 am
Post subject: Jens M-53 Howitzer

[img][/img][img][/img][img][/img][img][/img][img][/img][img][/img][img][/img]
Here are the M53 Howitzer pics. The serial number is 197, which you can see in the data plates, (maybe). Ugly paint scheme, not sure what its suppossed to look like, (maybe Marine?) but ugly. I could find no stampings on the outside of the vehicle, and the paint did not appear thick to hide the numbers. Your other requests will be coming shortly. I hope this helps. BTW, I thought "M53" was wrong but thats the nomenclature given on the tour map.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
oldtop
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 17, 2006
Posts: 70

PostPosted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:29 am
Post subject: Re: Jens M-53 Howitzer

Its an M53 155mm "gun" not howitzer, and she a later production, you tell this by the "steering yoke", first production had an god awful "wobble stick" that you could shift into revers by accident with when you hit a bump. This is a rare M53, it has the complete rammer, rammer head and chain, if you trip the rammer without a projo in the tray the head and drive chain will travel right out the gun barrel and drop out the muzzle..and it is "heavy".
Back to top
View user's profile
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 3:15 am
Post subject: Re: Jens M-53 Howitzer

I went off what the museum "map sheet" told me. Tell me more about this vehicle. I have the curators name and I'll inform him, (set him straight) as to what he has.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 11:57 am
Post subject: Re: Jens M-53 Howitzer

The driver was in the turret? Wonder how all the linkages connected to the power plant?

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 12:51 pm
Post subject: Re: Jens M-53 Howitzer

Cool!

I saw one of those in an episode of 'Combat' ... knew it was the wrong era for that vehicle! Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile
oldtop
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 17, 2006
Posts: 70

PostPosted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 1:00 pm
Post subject: Re: Jens M-53 Howitzer

Technicaly it was called a cab, although the cab didn't rotate 360 deg. there was a hydraulically/flexcable linked throttle, brakes, steering, and shifting. Get a hyd leak and you had no throttle you just sit there and idle.
Other than the main gun the only differance is there was a shell hoist that ran on a track on the cab roof. Both vehicles used the same power pack (engine-trans), they shared it with the M48 tanks, true the power pack sits reversed postion from the tanks, the M53 and 55 had a bull gear in the finale-driver that reversed the output direction.
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:19 pm
Post subject: Re: Jens M-53 Howitzer

- SFC_Jeff_Button
I went off what the museum "map sheet" told me. Tell me more about this vehicle. I have the curators name and I'll inform him, (set him straight) as to what he has.


Its a common error. Even I tend to fall back on thinking any modern-era self-propelled artillery piece must be a howitzer and not a gun. But the M53 was self-propelled gun.

Oldtop, help us understand, this doesnt mean the M53 was intended for direct fire right??? If not why wasnt it a howitzer?....

Jeff, you can find some info on the M53 here:
afvdb.50megs.com/usa/1...pgm53.html

Oh and yes, the Marine Corps did use M53s as mentioned in the above link.

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:37 pm
Post subject: Re: Jens M-53 Howitzer

BTW, here is the T97 prototype the M53 was based on (at APG of course).



I am told its registration number is 40228647.

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 5:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Jens M-53 Howitzer

'Oldtop, help us understand, this doesnt mean the M53 was intended for direct fire right??? If not why wasnt it a howitzer?.... '

Well I'm not oldtop but I can give this one a shot

In the aftermath of WWI the U.S. Army convened the Westervelt Board (also called the Caliber Board) to study the conglomeration of artillery weapons that were in the system and develop policy for the future. One of the major results was the development of theoretical families of artillery pieces each consisting of a high velocity gun and a howitzer that would share a common mount and recoil system. The mixture of guns and howitzers was to provide a mix of long range high velocity capability (guns) with a shorter range but heaver shell capability of hhowitzers.

in a previos post in the 240mm thread I listed the members of the various families that were actually developed the families were termed light (75mm gun/105mm howitzer), Medium (120mm gun/155mm howitzer), Heavy (155mm gun/8" howizer), and Very Heavy (8" gun/240mm howitzer). I think it would be a surmize to project a Superr Heavy (240mm gun/280mm howitzer) family into the mix but it may be that the board did include them

In most cases the boards findings were used to guide development through the low budget era of the 1920s & 30s but when the pre WWII buildup began there were several designs ready to be fully developed and put into production.

The Self propelled artillery guns were initially modifications of the standard towed guns (look inside an M-7 Priest and you can almost see a 105 complete with trails welded into place.) The M53/M55 were just a cold war progression from the M-40 SP 'Long Tom'. To be usable in a nuclear contaminated environment a fully enclosed 'gun house' was adopted and a recoil and mounting system more compatable with such a mount (instead of the two 'horns and large hydraulic cylinders of tehtowed 155/8") was developed

Neil - you've got pictures of the M55 on the new mile of tanks don't you?

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
oldtop
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 17, 2006
Posts: 70

PostPosted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Post subject: Re: Jens M-53 Howitzer

The M53 was one of the loudest guns I ever heard, my plt (Ontos) lived right next door to one at Hue in Nam, the Marine hung on to them long after they did away with the M55 8" Howitzer which was replaced by the M110 8". because it was a "gun" it had range on the 8" Howitzer. The problem was that there was a shotage of parts and all the Corps tanks were diesel. By time Nam came there were only two heavy tracker vehicles that used the 1790 gaser engines in the Corps, the LVT P-5 family and the M53 SPs....Now the Marine corps has never been really big on supply support on any of it's tracked vehicles (when both the Army and the Corps went to Iraq there were only 87 engine replacements for all the M1s being used and none in reserve..anywhere! this is for both service.
Back to top
View user's profile
Maple_Leaf_Eh
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 517

PostPosted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 6:37 pm
Post subject: Re: Jens M-53 Howitzer

- oldtop
....Now the Marine corps has never been really big on supply support on any of it's tracked vehicles (when both the Army and the Corps went to Iraq there were only 87 engine replacements for all the M1s being used and none in reserve..anywhere! this is for both service.


Spare parts are expensive, and they get old. Then they get used up and more need to be bought. All so troubling. Someone needs to be paid to count them and to do the inspections. If there is one line item in the budget that is vulnerable, it is the one to buy spare parts. It is just so much neater and tidier to look the other way, and order from the plant when you need one.

I was on a rifle range one day (and this is not about shooting either), with an Air Force suppy Corporal who was the "keeper" of a whole fleet of mothballed CF-5 jets. They had to keep so many in preservation, so many in inspection stages, and a few flyable. Whenever some 3rd World air force wanted to kick the tires, there was one to take for a spin. The Cpl had a 500-series Air Force maintainer Warrant Officer, who had a Captain, who had a Lieutenant Colonel, but the lowest guy seemed to like the job the most.
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 6:47 pm
Post subject: Re: Jens M-53 Howitzer

- bsmart

Neil - you've got pictures of the M55 on the new mile of tanks don't you?


Sure, here is "Tiny Tim.





Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
oldtop
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 17, 2006
Posts: 70

PostPosted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:05 am
Post subject: Re: Jens M-53 Howitzer

Very nice looking M55...very nice
Back to top
View user's profile
oldtop
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 17, 2006
Posts: 70

PostPosted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:48 am
Post subject: Re: Jens M-53 Howitzer

Spare parts are purchased on contracts, the type, ammount of said support parts, these are to be in place before the equippment is put in service, they have a manufactors shelf life warranty,. Usage data is used to determine the ammount and type to be placed on contracted, however if this is a new first time uses "end item" (end item are the planes, trucks, tanks, engines, trans..etc) then test data is used (test data is ALWAYS wrong) for the Marine Corps they always short change the end items, the M50 selfpropelled recoiless rifle "pig" or Ontos was put in-service with a short supply support list and the M50A1 with even a worse (worser) support , total parts support for a 5 vehicle Ontos plt with 22 months in-country operations was eight (8) used sparkplugs! The replacement time for engines for M60A1s in 1974 was one year or more, I had 3 M60A1s that didn't ever get engines till they were shipped out for rebuild (the only way we could get engines was to "code out" tanks and order new ones with engines) But the system caught on and closed that loophole on us also.. "remember the equippment you uses was built by the "lowest bidder"! I had M109s in my arty unit that we'er past their in service time and milage but I couldn't get replacements because the Corps couldn't make up its mind if they were going to keep them...But they still demanded I keep the guns (18 ) operational even if there were no resources in the system, I was begging from the Army and NG.
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum