±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 344
Total: 344
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Home
03: Community Forums
04: Photo Gallery
05: Downloads
06: Community Forums
07: Member Screenshots
08: Community Forums
09: Member Screenshots
10: Member Screenshots
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Home
15: Home
16: Community Forums
17: Member Screenshots
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: Community Forums
21: Photo Gallery
22: Community Forums
23: Member Screenshots
24: Community Forums
25: News Archive
26: Community Forums
27: News Archive
28: Member Screenshots
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Photo Gallery
32: Community Forums
33: News Archive
34: Home
35: Community Forums
36: Photo Gallery
37: Home
38: Community Forums
39: Photo Gallery
40: Member Screenshots
41: Member Screenshots
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Home
45: Community Forums
46: Member Screenshots
47: Community Forums
48: Member Screenshots
49: Community Forums
50: News Archive
51: Member Screenshots
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: News Archive
56: Community Forums
57: Photo Gallery
58: Home
59: Downloads
60: News Archive
61: Downloads
62: Home
63: Community Forums
64: Member Screenshots
65: News Archive
66: Community Forums
67: Photo Gallery
68: Community Forums
69: Photo Gallery
70: Community Forums
71: Home
72: Community Forums
73: Home
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Member Screenshots
79: Member Screenshots
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Home
83: Member Screenshots
84: Member Screenshots
85: Community Forums
86: Home
87: Community Forums
88: Home
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: Home
92: Community Forums
93: Statistics
94: Photo Gallery
95: News Archive
96: Home
97: Home
98: Community Forums
99: Home
100: Community Forums
101: Home
102: Downloads
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Home
108: Community Forums
109: Member Screenshots
110: Photo Gallery
111: Member Screenshots
112: Member Screenshots
113: Home
114: Member Screenshots
115: Member Screenshots
116: Home
117: Downloads
118: Member Screenshots
119: Photo Gallery
120: Community Forums
121: News Archive
122: Member Screenshots
123: Downloads
124: Member Screenshots
125: Home
126: Photo Gallery
127: Member Screenshots
128: Community Forums
129: Home
130: News Archive
131: Member Screenshots
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Photo Gallery
135: Member Screenshots
136: News Archive
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Home
140: Photo Gallery
141: News Archive
142: Member Screenshots
143: Community Forums
144: Member Screenshots
145: Home
146: Photo Gallery
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Member Screenshots
150: Home
151: Photo Gallery
152: Home
153: Member Screenshots
154: Member Screenshots
155: Community Forums
156: Home
157: Community Forums
158: Home
159: Photo Gallery
160: Home
161: Statistics
162: Member Screenshots
163: Member Screenshots
164: News Archive
165: Home
166: News Archive
167: Community Forums
168: News Archive
169: Home
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Downloads
173: Community Forums
174: Member Screenshots
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Home
178: Community Forums
179: Member Screenshots
180: Community Forums
181: News Archive
182: Member Screenshots
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Downloads
186: Member Screenshots
187: Home
188: News Archive
189: Home
190: Downloads
191: Photo Gallery
192: Member Screenshots
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Home
196: Home
197: Community Forums
198: Home
199: News
200: News Archive
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Home
204: Community Forums
205: Home
206: Community Forums
207: Home
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Community Forums
211: Home
212: Community Forums
213: News Archive
214: Community Forums
215: News Archive
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Member Screenshots
220: News Archive
221: Community Forums
222: Downloads
223: Photo Gallery
224: Community Forums
225: Home
226: Photo Gallery
227: Downloads
228: News Archive
229: Community Forums
230: Home
231: Home
232: Member Screenshots
233: News Archive
234: Photo Gallery
235: Community Forums
236: Photo Gallery
237: Photo Gallery
238: News
239: Home
240: Downloads
241: News Archive
242: Community Forums
243: Member Screenshots
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: Photo Gallery
247: Photo Gallery
248: Home
249: Community Forums
250: Downloads
251: Photo Gallery
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: Member Screenshots
256: Member Screenshots
257: Community Forums
258: Home
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: News Archive
265: Community Forums
266: Home
267: Community Forums
268: Photo Gallery
269: Member Screenshots
270: Home
271: Member Screenshots
272: Photo Gallery
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Home
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: Downloads
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Photo Gallery
282: Community Forums
283: News Archive
284: Home
285: News
286: Community Forums
287: Community Forums
288: Member Screenshots
289: Photo Gallery
290: Community Forums
291: Downloads
292: Community Forums
293: Community Forums
294: Home
295: News Archive
296: Statistics
297: Member Screenshots
298: Member Screenshots
299: Photo Gallery
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Home
303: Community Forums
304: Home
305: Home
306: Community Forums
307: Community Forums
308: Community Forums
309: Member Screenshots
310: Member Screenshots
311: Community Forums
312: Home
313: Home
314: Member Screenshots
315: Community Forums
316: Downloads
317: Member Screenshots
318: News Archive
319: Downloads
320: Community Forums
321: Home
322: Downloads
323: News Archive
324: Member Screenshots
325: Member Screenshots
326: News Archive
327: Member Screenshots
328: News Archive
329: Member Screenshots
330: Community Forums
331: Member Screenshots
332: Downloads
333: Statistics
334: Member Screenshots
335: Member Screenshots
336: Member Screenshots
337: News Archive
338: Community Forums
339: Member Screenshots
340: Community Forums
341: Member Screenshots
342: Member Screenshots
343: Member Screenshots
344: Member Screenshots

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Okay, so WAS the M10's 3" gun from the Navy?
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 5:36 pm
Post subject: Okay, so WAS the M10's 3" gun from the Navy?

Maybe someone here can help. I'm getting all kinds of conflicting information.

Back in the old Crow & Icks days it was often repeated that the M10 TD mounted an old naval 3" gun design. After several years the tide turned and the navy origins of the weapon came into disrepute. No less a figure than Phil Dyer wrote to chide me when I included the 3" gun-navy link in an old AFV News article. And on this forum members brought out the fact that the navy 3" gun and M10 3" gun have different length chambers for different shaped shell casings.

BUT, also on this board someone mentioned an anecdote about M10 TDs after Normandy using clandestinely obtained 3" navy star shells in the direct fire role! And a book I'm now reading on the TD force states outright that the M10 got the 3" gun because the U.S. submarine force was transitioning from its old 3" to 4" deck guns. And I must admit a navy 3" gun I spotted on gate guardian display really really did look like the M10 TD's weapon.

So, what gives? Is the old Crow & Icks era M10 = navy gun idea coming back? Anyone care to venture an opinion about the differencs in chambering?
Back to top
View user's profile
binder001
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 363

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 8:58 pm
Post subject: Re: Okay, so WAS the M10's 3" gun from the Navy?

The usual given lineage for 3" Gun M7, used in the M10 Gun Motor Carriage was from the Army's 3" AAA weapon, which was developed in the 1920's and was in service early into WW2. It was supplanted in the AAA role by the 90mm Gun M1. It might be that the services actually cooperated and developed a gun that could use each others' ammo (that level of cooperation would be surprising). One argument in favor of this is that AAA was under the auspices of the Coast Artillery who were more used to dealing with naval-type weapons and ammo.

I certainly can't claim expertise, but I DO know that the Navy had several 3" caliber weapons in use by WW1. The Army's 3" AA gun MIGHT have been evelpoed with or from the Navy's gun. There were numerous variation on the Navy 3" gun, see;

www.navweaps.com/Weapo...k10-22.htm

This is part of a nice site on naval ordnance thru the years.
Back to top
View user's profile
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 1:08 pm
Post subject: Re: Okay, so WAS the M10's 3" gun from the Navy?

As to the differing chambers, I wonder if the old 3" naval (AAA?) chamber might have been rebored for shorter bottle-shaped rounds for easier tank stowage. [Ooops -edited. It seems from the message the naval gun had a WIDER shell casing, not narrower. So much for reboring].


Last edited by mike_Duplessis on Fri Apr 28, 2006 6:12 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 1:26 pm
Post subject: Re: Okay, so WAS the M10's 3" gun from the Navy?

- mike_Duplessis
Maybe someone here can help. I'm getting all kinds of conflicting information.

Back in the old Crow & Icks days it was often repeated that the M10 TD mounted an old naval 3" gun design. After several years the tide turned and the navy origins of the weapon came into disrepute. No less a figure than Phil Dyer wrote to chide me when I included the 3" gun-navy link in an old AFV News article. And on this forum members brought out the fact that the navy 3" gun and M10 3" gun have different length chambers for different shaped shell casings.

BUT, also on this board someone mentioned an anecdote about M10 TDs after Normandy using clandestinely obtained 3" navy star shells in the direct fire role! And a book I'm now reading on the TD force states outright that the M10 got the 3" gun because the U.S. submarine force was transitioning from its old 3" to 4" deck guns. And I must admit a navy 3" gun I spotted on gate guardian display really really did look like the M10 TD's weapon.

So, what gives? Is the old Crow & Icks era M10 = navy gun idea coming back? Anyone care to venture an opinion about the differencs in chambering?


Well, according to Tony Williams site, the 76.2 x 585R cartridge case with a 103mm rim diameter was used in:

- 3" M1902 coast gun,
- 3" M1918, M1, M3 AA guns
- 3" M5 + M7 AT guns
- 3" M6 tank gun

US 76.2mm L/50 naval guns used a 76.2 x 585 to 594R cartridge case with a 111mm rim diameter.

It would seem that the 3" M1902 Coastal Gun fired a 15 pound round, which may be significant because in Hogg (ed): "The American Arsenal" it says about the M1918 AA gun that the design was based on a 3" (15 pdr.) Gun M1898 which seems to be another piece of coastal artillery.
The naval guns, on the other hand, seems to have fired a slightly lighter projectile of about 13 pounds. There also seems to be differences in the rifling, the M7 guns and its predecessors having one twist in 40 calibers, the naval guns having a 1 in 25.
So the naval gun and the anti-tank gun are simply not the same, which should remove any possibility that the M10s were ever armed with ex-submarine guns.

As for the use of navy star shells, the reason might be that the navy also used anti-aircraft guns from which the M7 gun originated. Or it may be that hey obtained the 3" shells and paired them with the proper cartridge.
I dont think the cartridge size would allow the use of the naval cartridge in the M7 anti-tank gun and vice versa.

If the M7 anti-tank gun has a naval background, it would be if the M1898/M1902 coastal guns originated in the 3" naval gun, which seems to have been made at the same time. But one may then question what "design" actually means, as both the cartridge and the gun was different between the two.

What book on TDs are you currently reading - perhaps it just got the info off the old Icks & Crow?

Claus B
Back to top
View user's profile
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 1:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Okay, so WAS the M10's 3" gun from the Navy?

To help stir the pot, here's a sharp photo of a U.S. 3" AA gun breech and its round around 1941.

The book on TDs that I'm reading is "The Tank Killers" by Yeide. It was published in '05 and is filled with oherwise authoritative sounding detail. I tend to believe a book until I stub my toe on an obviously wrong factoid - so far so good with this book.

Back to top
View user's profile
binder001
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 363

PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 2:01 pm
Post subject: Re: Okay, so WAS the M10's 3" gun from the Navy?

Don't let that take away from Mr. Yeide's book. He just wasn't into the minutae of where the gun came from. 3" is often a caliber associated with the Navy (at least in US terms), so the connection is easily drawn.
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 7:23 pm
Post subject: Re: Okay, so WAS the M10's 3" gun from the Navy?

I looked at Yeide's book last night

"A converted 3-inch (76mm) converted antiaircraft gun was mounted in an open top turret... A large number of 3-inch guns were available because they were being replaced on submarines by 5-inch models and in antiaircraft units with 90mm guns. "

It is footnoted "Telephone interview with John Hudson, May 2002. Gill, 17."

John Hudson is identified elsewhere as a Tank Destroyer Platoon Leader.

Gill is further identified as

Lonnie Gill, Tank Destroyer Forces, WWII (Paducah, Kentucky: Turner Publishing Company, 1992)


According to Norman Friedman in U.S. Submarines Through 1945: An Illustrated Design History The replacement of 3" guns with larger ones was not approved until June of 1942 and even then it was only 'afterthe fact' with 4" guns coming off decommisioned S-boats (Those guns were WWI or 1920s vintage) The 5" guns came even later and also were initially guns removed from other ships 5"/51 cal guns from the secondary batteries removed from Battleships and 5"/25 cal old AA guns that had been replaced in surface ships with 5"/38 guns were mounted. They were desired not for AA use but for antisurface use when Subs started doing more surface action late in the war

For thos not familiar with Friedman. I think of his 'Illustrated Design History' series in the same catagory as Hunnicutt

Mr Yeide lives in the Washington D.C. area according to his bio. I've thought about contacting him to try and get my copies of his books signed. Maybe I'll see if he still goes along with the ex-naval gun idea.

I'll put in a plug for his 'Steel Victory' book about the independent tank battalions in Europe. I think it covers what had been a large gap in the story of armor units in WWII

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 5:44 pm
Post subject: Re: Okay, so WAS the M10's 3" gun from the Navy?

Hi all,

It may have been on another topic altogether, but I recall a similar discussion on the old board. My memory is of a discussion regarding the 75mm or 76mm ammunition for the M4 tank (maybe the Firefly version?). The expert consensus was that the tankers took the projectiles from the Navy and put them into cartridge cases that fit the tank's gun.

Perhaps a similar situation resulted in star shells for the 3" TD guns?

C

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 5:56 pm
Post subject: Re: Okay, so WAS the M10's 3" gun from the Navy?

- C_Sherman
Hi all,

It may have been on another topic altogether, but I recall a similar discussion on the old board. My memory is of a discussion regarding the 75mm or 76mm ammunition for the M4 tank (maybe the Firefly version?). The expert consensus was that the tankers took the projectiles from the Navy and put them into cartridge cases that fit the tank's gun.

Perhaps a similar situation resulted in star shells for the 3" TD guns?

C
I remember a discussion a while back about the Marines on one of the Pacific Islands running into a shortage of either M4 75mm ammo or 75mm Pack Howitzer ammo and repackaging projectiles and charges from one into brass form the other. I think Oscar Gilbert or Ken Estes was the source

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2006 2:27 pm
Post subject: Re: Okay, so WAS the M10's 3" gun from the Navy?

I've had a problem all along with the "converted artillery/AA/naval weapon" idea. The gun cradle for the 3" gun on the M10 has twin recoil cylinders mounded either side of the barrel. You can see from the AA gun photo above that that recoil was a single attachment to the top of the breech! It looks to me like it might use the same ammo casings and maybe the same 3" barrel (not including the breech) but everthing else looks to be be new. That's like saying the howitzer on the M8 HMC was a 'converted' 75mm pack howitzer gun. You'd be hard pressed to come up with a common parts list for those two weapons.

I guess it all depends on what one means by 'converted'. I'm reminded of the story of grandpa's trusty hammer. Grandpa's hammer was indestructable, used continuously for 50 years without a problem, had to replace the handle three times and the head twice but it kept on going.
Back to top
View user's profile
binder001
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 363

PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2006 11:59 pm
Post subject: Re: Okay, so WAS the M10's 3" gun from the Navy?

I'm not in Ordnance, but it was my impression that the GUN is the barrel and breech, while the MOUNT includes the recoil and training parts. I can't speak for the breech, but there is reference to the 3" gun M7 using the barrel of the 3" AA gun. A similar process was used to mate the barrel of the 3" AA gun to the breech and mount of the 105mm howitzer to create the towed 3" AT gun.

By the way, if I remember my TM (it's been a while since I read it) the barrel and breech of the 75mm howitzer in the M8 Howitzer Motor Carriage WAS from the pack howitzer. There were converted barrels with a key added to fit the mount and new production barrels with the key integral (so I suppose those last were NOT converted guns - so we're BOTH right). The manual mentioned the parts differences.
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum