±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 339
Total: 339
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: Member Screenshots
05: Home
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Member Screenshots
09: Member Screenshots
10: Home
11: Downloads
12: Member Screenshots
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Member Screenshots
16: Downloads
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: Your Account
21: Photo Gallery
22: Community Forums
23: Photo Gallery
24: Community Forums
25: Member Screenshots
26: Home
27: Home
28: Member Screenshots
29: Member Screenshots
30: Home
31: Community Forums
32: Home
33: Member Screenshots
34: Statistics
35: Downloads
36: Community Forums
37: Home
38: Home
39: Community Forums
40: Member Screenshots
41: Downloads
42: Home
43: Home
44: Home
45: Home
46: Home
47: Photo Gallery
48: Home
49: Home
50: Member Screenshots
51: Home
52: Home
53: Home
54: Member Screenshots
55: Home
56: Downloads
57: Home
58: Home
59: Home
60: Member Screenshots
61: Home
62: Member Screenshots
63: Downloads
64: Home
65: Photo Gallery
66: Home
67: Photo Gallery
68: Home
69: Community Forums
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Member Screenshots
74: Member Screenshots
75: Member Screenshots
76: Member Screenshots
77: Community Forums
78: Home
79: Member Screenshots
80: News Archive
81: Home
82: Member Screenshots
83: Home
84: Member Screenshots
85: Community Forums
86: Home
87: Home
88: Member Screenshots
89: Home
90: Home
91: Home
92: Home
93: News Archive
94: News Archive
95: Downloads
96: Home
97: Home
98: Member Screenshots
99: Home
100: Home
101: Home
102: Member Screenshots
103: Home
104: Home
105: Home
106: Home
107: Home
108: Home
109: Home
110: Statistics
111: Member Screenshots
112: Home
113: Member Screenshots
114: Home
115: Statistics
116: Member Screenshots
117: Home
118: Home
119: Photo Gallery
120: Photo Gallery
121: Community Forums
122: Home
123: Community Forums
124: Home
125: Home
126: Photo Gallery
127: Member Screenshots
128: Home
129: Community Forums
130: Photo Gallery
131: Member Screenshots
132: Community Forums
133: Home
134: Home
135: Home
136: Home
137: Downloads
138: Home
139: Photo Gallery
140: Photo Gallery
141: Photo Gallery
142: Photo Gallery
143: Downloads
144: Home
145: Community Forums
146: Home
147: Community Forums
148: Home
149: Home
150: Downloads
151: Home
152: Home
153: Home
154: Home
155: Home
156: Photo Gallery
157: Photo Gallery
158: Home
159: Home
160: Home
161: Home
162: Home
163: Home
164: Downloads
165: Home
166: Home
167: Home
168: Home
169: Community Forums
170: Home
171: Home
172: Home
173: Home
174: Home
175: Community Forums
176: Member Screenshots
177: Home
178: Photo Gallery
179: Member Screenshots
180: Community Forums
181: Home
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Home
185: Community Forums
186: Home
187: Home
188: Home
189: Home
190: Downloads
191: Photo Gallery
192: Community Forums
193: News Archive
194: Home
195: Home
196: Home
197: Home
198: Home
199: Home
200: Home
201: Home
202: Member Screenshots
203: Community Forums
204: Home
205: Member Screenshots
206: Home
207: Home
208: Home
209: Home
210: Photo Gallery
211: Home
212: Home
213: Home
214: Home
215: Statistics
216: Home
217: Home
218: Home
219: Community Forums
220: Home
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Photo Gallery
224: Community Forums
225: Home
226: Community Forums
227: Home
228: Home
229: Home
230: Home
231: Community Forums
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Member Screenshots
238: Member Screenshots
239: Statistics
240: Supporters
241: Member Screenshots
242: Member Screenshots
243: Community Forums
244: Photo Gallery
245: Home
246: Community Forums
247: Home
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Photo Gallery
251: Photo Gallery
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Member Screenshots
255: Community Forums
256: Member Screenshots
257: Community Forums
258: Downloads
259: Downloads
260: Member Screenshots
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Statistics
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Photo Gallery
269: Member Screenshots
270: Community Forums
271: Home
272: Home
273: Home
274: Home
275: Photo Gallery
276: Member Screenshots
277: Community Forums
278: Community Forums
279: Home
280: Photo Gallery
281: Photo Gallery
282: Community Forums
283: Downloads
284: Community Forums
285: Home
286: Member Screenshots
287: Downloads
288: Home
289: Photo Gallery
290: Home
291: Statistics
292: Home
293: Home
294: Photo Gallery
295: Home
296: Community Forums
297: Member Screenshots
298: Home
299: Home
300: Home
301: Downloads
302: Home
303: Downloads
304: Home
305: Home
306: Home
307: Photo Gallery
308: Community Forums
309: Member Screenshots
310: Community Forums
311: Photo Gallery
312: News Archive
313: Community Forums
314: Member Screenshots
315: Home
316: Member Screenshots
317: Home
318: Home
319: Downloads
320: Member Screenshots
321: Member Screenshots
322: Statistics
323: Member Screenshots
324: Member Screenshots
325: Photo Gallery
326: Community Forums
327: Home
328: Home
329: Member Screenshots
330: Member Screenshots
331: Community Forums
332: Home
333: Photo Gallery
334: Member Screenshots
335: Home
336: Photo Gallery
337: Community Forums
338: Member Screenshots
339: Photo Gallery

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Okay, so WAS the M10's 3" gun from the Navy?
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 5:36 pm
Post subject: Okay, so WAS the M10's 3" gun from the Navy?

Maybe someone here can help. I'm getting all kinds of conflicting information.

Back in the old Crow & Icks days it was often repeated that the M10 TD mounted an old naval 3" gun design. After several years the tide turned and the navy origins of the weapon came into disrepute. No less a figure than Phil Dyer wrote to chide me when I included the 3" gun-navy link in an old AFV News article. And on this forum members brought out the fact that the navy 3" gun and M10 3" gun have different length chambers for different shaped shell casings.

BUT, also on this board someone mentioned an anecdote about M10 TDs after Normandy using clandestinely obtained 3" navy star shells in the direct fire role! And a book I'm now reading on the TD force states outright that the M10 got the 3" gun because the U.S. submarine force was transitioning from its old 3" to 4" deck guns. And I must admit a navy 3" gun I spotted on gate guardian display really really did look like the M10 TD's weapon.

So, what gives? Is the old Crow & Icks era M10 = navy gun idea coming back? Anyone care to venture an opinion about the differencs in chambering?
Back to top
View user's profile
binder001
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 363

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 8:58 pm
Post subject: Re: Okay, so WAS the M10's 3" gun from the Navy?

The usual given lineage for 3" Gun M7, used in the M10 Gun Motor Carriage was from the Army's 3" AAA weapon, which was developed in the 1920's and was in service early into WW2. It was supplanted in the AAA role by the 90mm Gun M1. It might be that the services actually cooperated and developed a gun that could use each others' ammo (that level of cooperation would be surprising). One argument in favor of this is that AAA was under the auspices of the Coast Artillery who were more used to dealing with naval-type weapons and ammo.

I certainly can't claim expertise, but I DO know that the Navy had several 3" caliber weapons in use by WW1. The Army's 3" AA gun MIGHT have been evelpoed with or from the Navy's gun. There were numerous variation on the Navy 3" gun, see;

www.navweaps.com/Weapo...k10-22.htm

This is part of a nice site on naval ordnance thru the years.
Back to top
View user's profile
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 1:08 pm
Post subject: Re: Okay, so WAS the M10's 3" gun from the Navy?

As to the differing chambers, I wonder if the old 3" naval (AAA?) chamber might have been rebored for shorter bottle-shaped rounds for easier tank stowage. [Ooops -edited. It seems from the message the naval gun had a WIDER shell casing, not narrower. So much for reboring].


Last edited by mike_Duplessis on Fri Apr 28, 2006 6:12 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 1:26 pm
Post subject: Re: Okay, so WAS the M10's 3" gun from the Navy?

- mike_Duplessis
Maybe someone here can help. I'm getting all kinds of conflicting information.

Back in the old Crow & Icks days it was often repeated that the M10 TD mounted an old naval 3" gun design. After several years the tide turned and the navy origins of the weapon came into disrepute. No less a figure than Phil Dyer wrote to chide me when I included the 3" gun-navy link in an old AFV News article. And on this forum members brought out the fact that the navy 3" gun and M10 3" gun have different length chambers for different shaped shell casings.

BUT, also on this board someone mentioned an anecdote about M10 TDs after Normandy using clandestinely obtained 3" navy star shells in the direct fire role! And a book I'm now reading on the TD force states outright that the M10 got the 3" gun because the U.S. submarine force was transitioning from its old 3" to 4" deck guns. And I must admit a navy 3" gun I spotted on gate guardian display really really did look like the M10 TD's weapon.

So, what gives? Is the old Crow & Icks era M10 = navy gun idea coming back? Anyone care to venture an opinion about the differencs in chambering?


Well, according to Tony Williams site, the 76.2 x 585R cartridge case with a 103mm rim diameter was used in:

- 3" M1902 coast gun,
- 3" M1918, M1, M3 AA guns
- 3" M5 + M7 AT guns
- 3" M6 tank gun

US 76.2mm L/50 naval guns used a 76.2 x 585 to 594R cartridge case with a 111mm rim diameter.

It would seem that the 3" M1902 Coastal Gun fired a 15 pound round, which may be significant because in Hogg (ed): "The American Arsenal" it says about the M1918 AA gun that the design was based on a 3" (15 pdr.) Gun M1898 which seems to be another piece of coastal artillery.
The naval guns, on the other hand, seems to have fired a slightly lighter projectile of about 13 pounds. There also seems to be differences in the rifling, the M7 guns and its predecessors having one twist in 40 calibers, the naval guns having a 1 in 25.
So the naval gun and the anti-tank gun are simply not the same, which should remove any possibility that the M10s were ever armed with ex-submarine guns.

As for the use of navy star shells, the reason might be that the navy also used anti-aircraft guns from which the M7 gun originated. Or it may be that hey obtained the 3" shells and paired them with the proper cartridge.
I dont think the cartridge size would allow the use of the naval cartridge in the M7 anti-tank gun and vice versa.

If the M7 anti-tank gun has a naval background, it would be if the M1898/M1902 coastal guns originated in the 3" naval gun, which seems to have been made at the same time. But one may then question what "design" actually means, as both the cartridge and the gun was different between the two.

What book on TDs are you currently reading - perhaps it just got the info off the old Icks & Crow?

Claus B
Back to top
View user's profile
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 1:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Okay, so WAS the M10's 3" gun from the Navy?

To help stir the pot, here's a sharp photo of a U.S. 3" AA gun breech and its round around 1941.

The book on TDs that I'm reading is "The Tank Killers" by Yeide. It was published in '05 and is filled with oherwise authoritative sounding detail. I tend to believe a book until I stub my toe on an obviously wrong factoid - so far so good with this book.

Back to top
View user's profile
binder001
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 363

PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 2:01 pm
Post subject: Re: Okay, so WAS the M10's 3" gun from the Navy?

Don't let that take away from Mr. Yeide's book. He just wasn't into the minutae of where the gun came from. 3" is often a caliber associated with the Navy (at least in US terms), so the connection is easily drawn.
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 7:23 pm
Post subject: Re: Okay, so WAS the M10's 3" gun from the Navy?

I looked at Yeide's book last night

"A converted 3-inch (76mm) converted antiaircraft gun was mounted in an open top turret... A large number of 3-inch guns were available because they were being replaced on submarines by 5-inch models and in antiaircraft units with 90mm guns. "

It is footnoted "Telephone interview with John Hudson, May 2002. Gill, 17."

John Hudson is identified elsewhere as a Tank Destroyer Platoon Leader.

Gill is further identified as

Lonnie Gill, Tank Destroyer Forces, WWII (Paducah, Kentucky: Turner Publishing Company, 1992)


According to Norman Friedman in U.S. Submarines Through 1945: An Illustrated Design History The replacement of 3" guns with larger ones was not approved until June of 1942 and even then it was only 'afterthe fact' with 4" guns coming off decommisioned S-boats (Those guns were WWI or 1920s vintage) The 5" guns came even later and also were initially guns removed from other ships 5"/51 cal guns from the secondary batteries removed from Battleships and 5"/25 cal old AA guns that had been replaced in surface ships with 5"/38 guns were mounted. They were desired not for AA use but for antisurface use when Subs started doing more surface action late in the war

For thos not familiar with Friedman. I think of his 'Illustrated Design History' series in the same catagory as Hunnicutt

Mr Yeide lives in the Washington D.C. area according to his bio. I've thought about contacting him to try and get my copies of his books signed. Maybe I'll see if he still goes along with the ex-naval gun idea.

I'll put in a plug for his 'Steel Victory' book about the independent tank battalions in Europe. I think it covers what had been a large gap in the story of armor units in WWII

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 5:44 pm
Post subject: Re: Okay, so WAS the M10's 3" gun from the Navy?

Hi all,

It may have been on another topic altogether, but I recall a similar discussion on the old board. My memory is of a discussion regarding the 75mm or 76mm ammunition for the M4 tank (maybe the Firefly version?). The expert consensus was that the tankers took the projectiles from the Navy and put them into cartridge cases that fit the tank's gun.

Perhaps a similar situation resulted in star shells for the 3" TD guns?

C

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2006 5:56 pm
Post subject: Re: Okay, so WAS the M10's 3" gun from the Navy?

- C_Sherman
Hi all,

It may have been on another topic altogether, but I recall a similar discussion on the old board. My memory is of a discussion regarding the 75mm or 76mm ammunition for the M4 tank (maybe the Firefly version?). The expert consensus was that the tankers took the projectiles from the Navy and put them into cartridge cases that fit the tank's gun.

Perhaps a similar situation resulted in star shells for the 3" TD guns?

C
I remember a discussion a while back about the Marines on one of the Pacific Islands running into a shortage of either M4 75mm ammo or 75mm Pack Howitzer ammo and repackaging projectiles and charges from one into brass form the other. I think Oscar Gilbert or Ken Estes was the source

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2006 2:27 pm
Post subject: Re: Okay, so WAS the M10's 3" gun from the Navy?

I've had a problem all along with the "converted artillery/AA/naval weapon" idea. The gun cradle for the 3" gun on the M10 has twin recoil cylinders mounded either side of the barrel. You can see from the AA gun photo above that that recoil was a single attachment to the top of the breech! It looks to me like it might use the same ammo casings and maybe the same 3" barrel (not including the breech) but everthing else looks to be be new. That's like saying the howitzer on the M8 HMC was a 'converted' 75mm pack howitzer gun. You'd be hard pressed to come up with a common parts list for those two weapons.

I guess it all depends on what one means by 'converted'. I'm reminded of the story of grandpa's trusty hammer. Grandpa's hammer was indestructable, used continuously for 50 years without a problem, had to replace the handle three times and the head twice but it kept on going.
Back to top
View user's profile
binder001
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 363

PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2006 11:59 pm
Post subject: Re: Okay, so WAS the M10's 3" gun from the Navy?

I'm not in Ordnance, but it was my impression that the GUN is the barrel and breech, while the MOUNT includes the recoil and training parts. I can't speak for the breech, but there is reference to the 3" gun M7 using the barrel of the 3" AA gun. A similar process was used to mate the barrel of the 3" AA gun to the breech and mount of the 105mm howitzer to create the towed 3" AT gun.

By the way, if I remember my TM (it's been a while since I read it) the barrel and breech of the 75mm howitzer in the M8 Howitzer Motor Carriage WAS from the pack howitzer. There were converted barrels with a key added to fit the mount and new production barrels with the key integral (so I suppose those last were NOT converted guns - so we're BOTH right). The manual mentioned the parts differences.
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum