±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 255
Total: 255
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Home
03: Home
04: Community Forums
05: Photo Gallery
06: Community Forums
07: Home
08: Home
09: Community Forums
10: Home
11: Your Account
12: Home
13: Home
14: Community Forums
15: Home
16: Photo Gallery
17: Member Screenshots
18: Community Forums
19: Contact
20: Photo Gallery
21: Community Forums
22: Photo Gallery
23: Community Forums
24: Home
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Member Screenshots
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Home
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: LinkToUs
35: Community Forums
36: Home
37: Home
38: Community Forums
39: Home
40: Community Forums
41: Home
42: Your Account
43: Community Forums
44: Photo Gallery
45: Home
46: Photo Gallery
47: Home
48: News Archive
49: Photo Gallery
50: Community Forums
51: Home
52: Home
53: Photo Gallery
54: Home
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Home
58: Home
59: Photo Gallery
60: News Archive
61: Member Screenshots
62: Home
63: Statistics
64: Home
65: Home
66: Home
67: Member Screenshots
68: Community Forums
69: Photo Gallery
70: Community Forums
71: Home
72: News
73: Community Forums
74: Home
75: Community Forums
76: News Archive
77: Your Account
78: Home
79: Community Forums
80: News Archive
81: Home
82: Community Forums
83: Home
84: Home
85: Home
86: Community Forums
87: News Archive
88: Home
89: News Archive
90: Home
91: Photo Gallery
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Your Account
95: Home
96: Home
97: Photo Gallery
98: Member Screenshots
99: Home
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Photo Gallery
105: Member Screenshots
106: Member Screenshots
107: Downloads
108: Community Forums
109: Home
110: Community Forums
111: Home
112: Home
113: Home
114: News
115: Photo Gallery
116: Member Screenshots
117: Home
118: Community Forums
119: News Archive
120: Home
121: Photo Gallery
122: Community Forums
123: Community Forums
124: Home
125: Community Forums
126: Member Screenshots
127: Home
128: Downloads
129: Home
130: Community Forums
131: Member Screenshots
132: Photo Gallery
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Home
137: Home
138: Home
139: Member Screenshots
140: Home
141: News Archive
142: News
143: Home
144: Community Forums
145: Home
146: Member Screenshots
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Photo Gallery
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Home
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Photo Gallery
156: Home
157: Community Forums
158: Photo Gallery
159: Photo Gallery
160: News
161: Community Forums
162: Home
163: Home
164: Community Forums
165: Your Account
166: Community Forums
167: News Archive
168: Home
169: Photo Gallery
170: Community Forums
171: Statistics
172: Community Forums
173: Photo Gallery
174: Home
175: Home
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Home
179: Home
180: Home
181: Home
182: Home
183: Home
184: Community Forums
185: Photo Gallery
186: Your Account
187: Member Screenshots
188: Home
189: Community Forums
190: Community Forums
191: Community Forums
192: Home
193: Photo Gallery
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Photo Gallery
197: Community Forums
198: News Archive
199: Community Forums
200: Home
201: Community Forums
202: News
203: Home
204: Home
205: Community Forums
206: Member Screenshots
207: Home
208: Home
209: Photo Gallery
210: Photo Gallery
211: Community Forums
212: Member Screenshots
213: Home
214: Home
215: Community Forums
216: Home
217: Photo Gallery
218: Community Forums
219: Home
220: Photo Gallery
221: Home
222: News Archive
223: Community Forums
224: Home
225: Community Forums
226: Home
227: Community Forums
228: Member Screenshots
229: Home
230: Member Screenshots
231: News Archive
232: Home
233: Downloads
234: Member Screenshots
235: Home
236: News
237: Community Forums
238: Home
239: Home
240: Photo Gallery
241: Home
242: Photo Gallery
243: Member Screenshots
244: Home
245: News Archive
246: Photo Gallery
247: Photo Gallery
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Home
251: Community Forums
252: Home
253: Community Forums
254: Home
255: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Stryker MGS at Armor Symposium
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
MarkHolloway
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 2054
Location: Beatty, Nevada
PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2006 8:35 am
Post subject: Stryker MGS at Armor Symposium

"The 105 mm cannon can also take out snipers, Rogers said, because with one shot, it can destroy the entire area where a sniper is firing from." Laughing

www4.army.mil/ocpa/pri...d_key=8979

_________________
"TUMBLEWEED"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2006 11:18 am
Post subject: Re: Stryker MGS at Armor Symposium

- MarkHolloway
"The 105 mm cannon can also take out snipers, Rogers said, because with one shot, it can destroy the entire area where a sniper is firing from." Laughing

www4.army.mil/ocpa/pri...d_key=8979


Yep, "Davey Crockett" was also an effective counter-sniper weapon. Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2006 2:22 pm
Post subject: Re: Stryker MGS at Armor Symposium

- Doug_Kibbey
- MarkHolloway
"The 105 mm cannon can also take out snipers, Rogers said, because with one shot, it can destroy the entire area where a sniper is firing from." lol

http//www4.army.mil/ocpa/print.php?story_id_key=8979


Yep, "Davey Crockett" was also an effective counter-sniper weapon. lol

"We had to destroy the village in order to save it"

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2006 6:10 pm
Post subject: Re: Stryker MGS at Armor Symposium

VERY cool finally seeing MGS dressed in its slat cage.

Notice they've dicarded the heavy frame used on the original design. Looks a LOT lighter, rather like the Autralian LAV cage design.
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2006 6:39 pm
Post subject: Re: Stryker MGS at Armor Symposium

But will they be carrying the big gray ramp with them in order to fire at low angles? (Or to absorb the recoil so it doesn't roll backwards?)

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2006 6:48 pm
Post subject: Re: Stryker MGS at Armor Symposium

People have been questioning MGS's ability to take the 105mm gun's recoil. My thought is since its mostly an 'assault gun' its going to mostly be firing HE. HE usually has significantly less kick than a full-charge APFSDS KE round. So... I imagine... for 95% of its weapon use MGS should be able to handle the 105mm gun recoil with a decent margin of safety. The rare time they're compelled to fire a KE round down-range they probably might be working at the outside edge of the recoils system's capabilities.

My 2¢ based burdoned by no actual information.
Back to top
View user's profile
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2006 7:16 pm
Post subject: Re: Stryker MGS at Armor Symposium

The MGS was exhibited at the last Armor Conference 2 years ago. I had the occasion of getting the 'nickel' tour by one of the crewmembers.

I'll be exhibit 'sitting' this year, so I will be sure to take alot of 'cool' photos, for those of ya'll not able to make it.

Don

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2006 1:31 am
Post subject: Re: Stryker MGS at Armor Symposium

Nice picture Mike,
Trying to figure out "Why?" one would fire a vehicle on a sync ramp. Maybe they wanted to make sure the recoil system could handle high angle firing and didn't have a range that would support firing above 10 degrees. Who know's? I imagine if it's made to tank standards it's elevation range should be +30 and -10 degrees from horizontal. Seems like everything you see or hear about the MGS is kinda hokey though.

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2006 7:11 am
Post subject: Re: Stryker MGS at Armor Symposium

Hi Joe! Hi Folks!

- Joe_D

Trying to figure out "Why?" one would fire a vehicle on a sync ramp. Maybe they wanted to make sure the recoil system could handle high angle firing and didn't have a range that would support firing above 10 degrees.


Range limitations would be my guess.

- Joe_

if it's made to tank standards it's elevation range should be +30 and -10 degrees from horizontal.


Maybe, but I think if folks didn't think of the MGS in tank type terms, but rather along the lines of a M151 with a M40 recoilless rifle they would have a better understanding of what that vehicle is being developed for.

Yes, the old M40 RR could kill tanks, but it wasn't the best weapon system for that job. But as a direct fire heavy weapon for infantry support it was a good system for it's day. With the MGS, the crew has some armored protection where the old M151/M40RR had none. The M151/M40RR only carried four (or six)rounds. While the MGS doesn't carry as many rounds as an Abrams, it does carry alot more that the old M151/M40RR system.

As for using the 105 as an anti-sniper weapon, I recalled during some of the fighting in Iraq were an Abrams used it's 120 to take out a sniper in a hotel. While it didn't take down the building, it did put a stop to the sniping that was coming out of that location. When all the troops that are pinned down only have .223 cal rounds, a 120 or 105 is not over kill, that's just using what you have to get the job done.

My 2 cents,
Sgt, Scouts Out! Smile

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Hellfish6
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 09, 2006
Posts: 151
Location: Orlando
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2006 1:06 pm
Post subject: Re: Stryker MGS at Armor Symposium

Why wouldn't a 90mm gun or an old M101/M102 howitzer duct taped to the roof be better than the M68? I mean 18 rounds is nothing. The South African Ratel-90, the spiritual ancestor of the MGS, was able to carry something like 300 rounds of 90mm ammo if it needed to, and a 90mm is still effective against T-55s. Hell, the new Cockerill guns and ammo might be even more effective.
Back to top
View user's profile
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2006 2:02 pm
Post subject: Re: Stryker MGS at Armor Symposium

I've lost count how many time either a 90mm low pressure or 75mm high pressure light gun 'almost' made it into the U.S. inventory. But for 20+ years now the 'Holy Grail' at the Pentagon has been to 'fit a low recoil version of the standard 105mm tank gun onto a light chassis. Its been the so long, as a matter of fact, that now that the Grail quest has been reached the poor 105mm gun is now obsolscent and any remaining 105mm ammo stocks are out of date!
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2006 2:11 pm
Post subject: Re: Stryker MGS at Armor Symposium

- Hellfish6
Why wouldn't a 90mm gun or an old M101/M102 howitzer duct taped to the roof be better than the M68? I mean 18 rounds is nothing. The South African Ratel-90, the spiritual ancestor of the MGS, was able to carry something like 300 rounds of 90mm ammo if it needed to, and a 90mm is still effective against T-55s. Hell, the new Cockerill guns and ammo might be even more effective.


Two reasons:
1) Primary mission is bunker busting & anti-personnel. 90mm rounds couldnt do well enough for the former.
2) For the secondary mission of killing tanks, the threat requirement was T--62 level (this was publicly stated & known), not T-55. AFAIK, 90mm also had some difficulty with this. Dont believe a howitzer could...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Thu May 11, 2006 6:58 pm
Post subject: Re: Stryker MGS at Armor Symposium

Buzzed by there today, set-up has begun. Should be a good event.

"'Elvis' Rolling Eyes will be in the building all week..."

Anyone else planning on attending, stop by 'our' exhibit and say hi.


Don

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 3:21 am
Post subject: Re: Stryker MGS at Armor Symposium

Neil,
The Army has pretty much stopped buying the older HEAT round (M830) for the newer MPAT (M830A1) and HE-OR (M908) when it comes to the 120mm. I'm not to familiar with the MGS so correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the ammunition planned for it also going to be combustible cartridge similar to the what the M1 has. The above mentioned rounds actually use a lot less explosives compared to a standard HEAT round but are far more effective as both AT and bunker busting respectively (Saboted Heat Round). I would imagine the HE round for the MGS would be a 105mm version of these two rounds. The old M456,A1 and A2 are pretty old stuff design wise.

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 12:41 pm
Post subject: Re: Stryker MGS at Armor Symposium

I think I read somewhere the M830A1 round was to have the steel casing - the news release said they were to be steel so be more robust for handling in the autoloader, but the writer may have been confused. Old U.S. 105 rounds have had steel casings for decades. I was under the (perhaps mistaken) impression that the only real difference between the M830 and M830A1 rounds was the later round met modern safety standards.
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 3
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum