±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 227
Total: 227
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: Photo Gallery
05: Home
06: Home
07: Downloads
08: Community Forums
09: Community Forums
10: Community Forums
11: Home
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Home
15: Home
16: Home
17: Home
18: Photo Gallery
19: Community Forums
20: Home
21: Home
22: Home
23: Home
24: Photo Gallery
25: News Archive
26: Photo Gallery
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Home
30: Home
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Member Screenshots
34: Community Forums
35: Member Screenshots
36: Community Forums
37: Community Forums
38: Home
39: Home
40: Home
41: Home
42: Home
43: Community Forums
44: Home
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Home
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Home
51: Home
52: Your Account
53: Member Screenshots
54: Community Forums
55: Photo Gallery
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Home
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Downloads
65: Community Forums
66: Photo Gallery
67: Community Forums
68: Photo Gallery
69: News Archive
70: Community Forums
71: Photo Gallery
72: News
73: Community Forums
74: Photo Gallery
75: Your Account
76: Community Forums
77: Home
78: Community Forums
79: Downloads
80: Photo Gallery
81: Community Forums
82: Photo Gallery
83: Community Forums
84: Member Screenshots
85: Community Forums
86: Home
87: Photo Gallery
88: Photo Gallery
89: Home
90: Your Account
91: Community Forums
92: Your Account
93: Home
94: Home
95: Home
96: Home
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Home
100: Home
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: News Archive
104: Home
105: Photo Gallery
106: Downloads
107: Home
108: Home
109: Home
110: Community Forums
111: News
112: News Archive
113: Home
114: Member Screenshots
115: Community Forums
116: Home
117: Home
118: Community Forums
119: News Archive
120: Community Forums
121: Home
122: Community Forums
123: Home
124: Community Forums
125: Member Screenshots
126: Community Forums
127: Photo Gallery
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Photo Gallery
135: Community Forums
136: Downloads
137: Photo Gallery
138: Community Forums
139: News
140: Downloads
141: Home
142: Community Forums
143: Photo Gallery
144: Photo Gallery
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Downloads
148: Statistics
149: Member Screenshots
150: Community Forums
151: News Archive
152: Home
153: Downloads
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Home
159: Member Screenshots
160: Your Account
161: Community Forums
162: Statistics
163: Photo Gallery
164: Photo Gallery
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Home
168: Downloads
169: Photo Gallery
170: Photo Gallery
171: Home
172: Member Screenshots
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Community Forums
176: Home
177: Home
178: Home
179: Home
180: Home
181: Member Screenshots
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: News Archive
185: Member Screenshots
186: Your Account
187: Home
188: Home
189: Community Forums
190: Member Screenshots
191: News
192: Home
193: Member Screenshots
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Member Screenshots
198: Home
199: Home
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Home
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Home
206: Community Forums
207: News
208: Community Forums
209: Member Screenshots
210: Member Screenshots
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Member Screenshots
214: Community Forums
215: Home
216: Community Forums
217: Home
218: Community Forums
219: Home
220: Home
221: Community Forums
222: Photo Gallery
223: Home
224: Downloads
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
K5 Leopold on Tiger I hulls instead of rails, ever happen?
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
geoffsteer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 114

PostPosted: Fri May 19, 2006 4:18 pm
Post subject: K5 Leopold on Tiger I hulls instead of rails, ever happen?

Hi Guys-
Found this set of plans while surfing the web, the plans are bottom row, right side:
modelbox.free.fr/photo...index.html
The plans appear to suggest that the K5 could be taken off its railway trucks and placed instead on two Tiger I hulls or, at least, that was the proposal.
Did this ever actually happen? Now this might get me to forget about my problems with available shelf space and just go ahead and buy the Trumpeter Leo!!!
With thanks-
Geoff Steer [;-{/) Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Fri May 19, 2006 4:41 pm
Post subject: Re: K5 Leopold on Tiger I hulls instead of rails, ever happen?

I believe it was a plan in case the rail-lines were cut by bombing etc. Not sure if any Tigers were actually modified in this way...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Fri May 19, 2006 5:02 pm
Post subject: Re: K5 Leopold on Tiger I hulls instead of rails, ever happen?

That looks like one of those thing that if it ever really happened we would've heard about it - and been building kits of it - a looooong time ago!

I'm highly skeptical that would've actually ever worked. Would've compressed the tortion bar suspension right down to the ground, I'd imagine, unless giant railway guns weigh less than I suppose they do.
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Fri May 19, 2006 5:07 pm
Post subject: Re: K5 Leopold on Tiger I hulls instead of rails, ever happe

I'm with Mike, I doubt the suspension would have held it up even static...and with the already stressed drivetrains, well.....

I can't convince myself that this lash-up could have traversed 10' on marble floors without failing.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
geoffsteer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 114

PostPosted: Fri May 19, 2006 8:09 pm
Post subject: Re: K5 Leopold on Tiger I hulls instead of rails, ever happe

Hi Neil & Doug and Mike-
I am sure you guys are correct about the wieght problem. One obvious question does occurr here though, why would the plans even be drawn up in the first place? I mean why would the proposal be put forward when it was known in advance that it simply would not work? Okay, I realize we have no way of knowing exactly when or by who the plans were done. Could be somebody thought the whole idea just looked interesting without any regard for practicality, still you have to wonder?
Thanks for the input-
Geoff Steer [;-{/)
Back to top
View user's profile
Cloudy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 06, 2006
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Sat May 20, 2006 3:36 am
Post subject: Re: K5 Leopold on Tiger I hulls instead of rails, ever happe

- geoffsteer
Hi Neil & Doug and Mike-
I mean why would the proposal be put forward when it was known in advance that it simply would not work? [;-{/)


One only has to look at their aircraft designs, large panzer designs and V-weapon designs in retrospect and ask "What were they thinking?" Wacky designs do find their way to prototype stage sometimes only to fail in practical testing. Another factor could be just trying to win a contract for your company to milk the government cash cow regardless of the practicality of the design (we'll make it work)... Hmmmm, I believe that it may actually work in much the same manner today with bribery, legal/illegal shenanigans and pork barrel politics contributing Wink


Under the impetus of war or impending war, many avenues of research that seem silly in retrospect may be explored to gain a technological edge. War also tends to bring out the "kook" type of inventor with a zany plan for a war-winning weapon. The difficulty lies in sorting out the coal from the diamonds and committing your nation's scare resources to a dubious line of research. Sometimes the right choices are made, sometimes they aren't...
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Sat May 20, 2006 1:22 pm
Post subject: Re: K5 Leopold on Tiger I hulls instead of rails, ever happe

- geoffsteer
Hi Neil & Doug and Mike-
I am sure you guys are correct about the wieght problem. One obvious question does occurr here though, why would the plans even be drawn up in the first place? I mean why would the proposal be put forward when it was known in advance that it simply would not work? Okay, I realize we have no way of knowing exactly when or by who the plans were done. Could be somebody thought the whole idea just looked interesting without any regard for practicality, still you have to wonder?
Thanks for the input-
Geoff Steer [;-{/)


From German Artillery of World War Two by Ian Hogg, p. 133:

"A most interesting project was begun in 1943 at the instigation of the army. It was decided that, owing to the increased intensity of Allied air attacks, a railway gun should be developed that was capable of cross-country detours around points at which the track had been destroyed. The gun itself was also intended to carry an integral turntable platform so it could be lowered to the track and the bogies run clear, leaving the weapon ready to fire from the platform with 360 [degree] traverse. This idea resembled the American 14in M1920 railgun, but the idea was then carried further by a suggestion that it should then be possible to partly dismantle the K 5 and transport it across country on special transporters based on the chassis and running gear of the Pz Kpfw VI (Tiger tank). In this, one transporter was to carry the breech mechanism, two were to carry the barrel between them, two were to take the gun carriage and one was to move the platform. The mounting was also to be designed to take either the barrel of the 28cm K 5 or a new 38cm howitzer with a planned range of 25000m(27340yd) with a 800kg(1764lb) shell. The whole project received a great deal of thought and would no doubt have been successfully completed in due course, but it was still in the planning stage when the war ended."

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Sat May 20, 2006 5:10 pm
Post subject: Re: K5 Leopold on Tiger I hulls instead of rails, ever happen?

Incidentally, this description appears to conflict with the picture referred to in the link - which has two Tigers carrying the entire carriage, gun, etc.



The plan was for no less than 6 Tigers to carry all the parts...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
geoffsteer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 114

PostPosted: Sat May 20, 2006 6:10 pm
Post subject: Re: K5 Leopold on Tiger I hulls instead of rails, ever happe

Hi Neil-
The oddest part of this whole idea is, why no middle support? Some sort of wheeled platform to serve as the main load bearing support would have likely rendered this wild idea work able. I mean if the Tigers were not called upon to bear the mainweight and were instead only expected to provide the motive power this idea would be somewhat practical. I have to say if six Tigers were to be used to transport a Leo off track, this would hardly be a reasonable/practical method to solve the original problem of providing a method to bypass damaged rail lines! Far easier indeed to just wait for track repair than to bring up six specialy altered Tiger Is!
Oh well, it was a fun modelling thought!
Thanks again for the input-
Geoff Steer
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sat May 20, 2006 7:22 pm
Post subject: Re: K5 Leopold on Tiger I hulls instead of rails, ever happe

Yeah, my comments were for the "as pictured" version. Disassembled and distributed over 5-6 vehicles, maybe....if you're only on beer run to 7-11 or somewhere really close.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum