±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 685
Total: 685
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Photo Gallery
02: Home
03: Community Forums
04: Member Screenshots
05: Downloads
06: Photo Gallery
07: Home
08: Home
09: Community Forums
10: Home
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Home
15: Downloads
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Home
19: Home
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Home
24: Community Forums
25: Downloads
26: Downloads
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Home
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Home
33: Home
34: Downloads
35: News Archive
36: Member Screenshots
37: Member Screenshots
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Your Account
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Downloads
48: Community Forums
49: Photo Gallery
50: Photo Gallery
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Home
54: Home
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Home
58: Community Forums
59: Home
60: Photo Gallery
61: Community Forums
62: Home
63: Community Forums
64: Member Screenshots
65: Community Forums
66: Community Forums
67: Home
68: Member Screenshots
69: Photo Gallery
70: News Archive
71: Home
72: Community Forums
73: Photo Gallery
74: Community Forums
75: Photo Gallery
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: Home
80: Community Forums
81: Home
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: Home
85: Home
86: Home
87: Photo Gallery
88: Photo Gallery
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: Photo Gallery
92: Photo Gallery
93: Home
94: Photo Gallery
95: Home
96: Photo Gallery
97: Member Screenshots
98: Community Forums
99: Member Screenshots
100: Photo Gallery
101: Statistics
102: Photo Gallery
103: Downloads
104: Member Screenshots
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Photo Gallery
110: Downloads
111: Member Screenshots
112: Photo Gallery
113: Photo Gallery
114: Photo Gallery
115: Community Forums
116: Member Screenshots
117: Community Forums
118: Photo Gallery
119: Member Screenshots
120: Home
121: Home
122: Downloads
123: Community Forums
124: Photo Gallery
125: Community Forums
126: Downloads
127: Photo Gallery
128: Home
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Photo Gallery
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Member Screenshots
135: Member Screenshots
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: News Archive
139: Downloads
140: Member Screenshots
141: Home
142: Photo Gallery
143: Photo Gallery
144: Community Forums
145: Photo Gallery
146: Home
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Home
150: Community Forums
151: Statistics
152: Home
153: Home
154: Community Forums
155: Photo Gallery
156: Community Forums
157: Member Screenshots
158: Home
159: Community Forums
160: Photo Gallery
161: Community Forums
162: Member Screenshots
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Photo Gallery
167: Home
168: Photo Gallery
169: Member Screenshots
170: Photo Gallery
171: Home
172: Home
173: Home
174: Community Forums
175: Photo Gallery
176: Community Forums
177: Downloads
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Member Screenshots
181: News
182: Community Forums
183: Photo Gallery
184: Community Forums
185: Photo Gallery
186: Community Forums
187: Photo Gallery
188: Statistics
189: Photo Gallery
190: Community Forums
191: Member Screenshots
192: Member Screenshots
193: Downloads
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Home
197: Community Forums
198: Downloads
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Photo Gallery
202: Home
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Downloads
210: Photo Gallery
211: Home
212: Your Account
213: Photo Gallery
214: Home
215: News Archive
216: Photo Gallery
217: Member Screenshots
218: Downloads
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Photo Gallery
224: Photo Gallery
225: Community Forums
226: Member Screenshots
227: Photo Gallery
228: Photo Gallery
229: News
230: Your Account
231: Community Forums
232: Photo Gallery
233: Community Forums
234: Downloads
235: Photo Gallery
236: Home
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Photo Gallery
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: Member Screenshots
243: Photo Gallery
244: Member Screenshots
245: Member Screenshots
246: Photo Gallery
247: Photo Gallery
248: Photo Gallery
249: Community Forums
250: Home
251: Community Forums
252: Photo Gallery
253: Home
254: Downloads
255: Photo Gallery
256: Member Screenshots
257: Home
258: Home
259: Downloads
260: Home
261: Home
262: Community Forums
263: Your Account
264: Statistics
265: Home
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Member Screenshots
269: Member Screenshots
270: Home
271: Downloads
272: Home
273: Photo Gallery
274: Community Forums
275: Photo Gallery
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: Member Screenshots
279: Community Forums
280: Home
281: Your Account
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Photo Gallery
285: Community Forums
286: Photo Gallery
287: Home
288: News
289: Home
290: Community Forums
291: News
292: Community Forums
293: Photo Gallery
294: Community Forums
295: Home
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Photo Gallery
300: Photo Gallery
301: Member Screenshots
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Downloads
306: Community Forums
307: Statistics
308: Member Screenshots
309: Community Forums
310: Home
311: Community Forums
312: Member Screenshots
313: Home
314: Home
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Home
318: Community Forums
319: Home
320: Community Forums
321: Member Screenshots
322: Photo Gallery
323: Home
324: Home
325: Home
326: Home
327: Photo Gallery
328: News Archive
329: Photo Gallery
330: Home
331: Downloads
332: Home
333: Downloads
334: Photo Gallery
335: Community Forums
336: Community Forums
337: Photo Gallery
338: Community Forums
339: Photo Gallery
340: Member Screenshots
341: Photo Gallery
342: Home
343: Community Forums
344: News Archive
345: Downloads
346: Home
347: Downloads
348: Community Forums
349: Community Forums
350: Photo Gallery
351: Your Account
352: Photo Gallery
353: Home
354: Photo Gallery
355: Member Screenshots
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Community Forums
359: Member Screenshots
360: Photo Gallery
361: Photo Gallery
362: Home
363: Member Screenshots
364: Home
365: Home
366: Community Forums
367: Member Screenshots
368: Community Forums
369: Member Screenshots
370: Home
371: Member Screenshots
372: Photo Gallery
373: Downloads
374: Member Screenshots
375: Community Forums
376: Photo Gallery
377: Member Screenshots
378: Community Forums
379: Home
380: News Archive
381: Member Screenshots
382: Home
383: Member Screenshots
384: Member Screenshots
385: Community Forums
386: Photo Gallery
387: Photo Gallery
388: Downloads
389: Member Screenshots
390: Statistics
391: Community Forums
392: Home
393: Home
394: Community Forums
395: Member Screenshots
396: Community Forums
397: Home
398: Home
399: Community Forums
400: Home
401: Statistics
402: Home
403: Community Forums
404: Home
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Community Forums
408: Home
409: Home
410: Downloads
411: Community Forums
412: Photo Gallery
413: Community Forums
414: Community Forums
415: Community Forums
416: Community Forums
417: Member Screenshots
418: Community Forums
419: Community Forums
420: Member Screenshots
421: Photo Gallery
422: Community Forums
423: Member Screenshots
424: Home
425: Home
426: Community Forums
427: Home
428: Home
429: Home
430: Community Forums
431: Community Forums
432: Photo Gallery
433: Community Forums
434: Photo Gallery
435: Community Forums
436: Member Screenshots
437: Home
438: News Archive
439: Downloads
440: Community Forums
441: Community Forums
442: Photo Gallery
443: Community Forums
444: News Archive
445: Photo Gallery
446: News Archive
447: Member Screenshots
448: Photo Gallery
449: Community Forums
450: Photo Gallery
451: Community Forums
452: Home
453: Community Forums
454: Photo Gallery
455: Community Forums
456: Photo Gallery
457: Photo Gallery
458: Member Screenshots
459: Downloads
460: Photo Gallery
461: Member Screenshots
462: Photo Gallery
463: Home
464: Photo Gallery
465: Community Forums
466: Community Forums
467: Photo Gallery
468: Home
469: Statistics
470: Downloads
471: Member Screenshots
472: Member Screenshots
473: Photo Gallery
474: Community Forums
475: Photo Gallery
476: Member Screenshots
477: Community Forums
478: News Archive
479: Community Forums
480: Community Forums
481: Member Screenshots
482: Member Screenshots
483: Community Forums
484: Member Screenshots
485: Your Account
486: Downloads
487: Statistics
488: Photo Gallery
489: Community Forums
490: Community Forums
491: Community Forums
492: Home
493: Community Forums
494: Home
495: Member Screenshots
496: Home
497: Home
498: Home
499: Member Screenshots
500: Photo Gallery
501: Home
502: Community Forums
503: Home
504: Home
505: Community Forums
506: Community Forums
507: Community Forums
508: Member Screenshots
509: Photo Gallery
510: Photo Gallery
511: Community Forums
512: Photo Gallery
513: Photo Gallery
514: Community Forums
515: Community Forums
516: Home
517: Community Forums
518: Member Screenshots
519: Community Forums
520: Community Forums
521: News
522: Photo Gallery
523: Photo Gallery
524: Home
525: Photo Gallery
526: Home
527: Community Forums
528: Home
529: Community Forums
530: Community Forums
531: Community Forums
532: Photo Gallery
533: Community Forums
534: Member Screenshots
535: Community Forums
536: News Archive
537: Member Screenshots
538: Downloads
539: Community Forums
540: Home
541: Photo Gallery
542: Member Screenshots
543: Community Forums
544: Home
545: Photo Gallery
546: Community Forums
547: Community Forums
548: Community Forums
549: Community Forums
550: Home
551: Photo Gallery
552: Community Forums
553: Home
554: Photo Gallery
555: Statistics
556: Community Forums
557: Photo Gallery
558: Community Forums
559: Community Forums
560: Home
561: News Archive
562: Home
563: Member Screenshots
564: Downloads
565: Community Forums
566: Photo Gallery
567: Photo Gallery
568: Photo Gallery
569: Community Forums
570: Community Forums
571: Community Forums
572: Home
573: Photo Gallery
574: Community Forums
575: Community Forums
576: Photo Gallery
577: Member Screenshots
578: Community Forums
579: Community Forums
580: News Archive
581: Home
582: Community Forums
583: Downloads
584: Community Forums
585: Community Forums
586: Member Screenshots
587: Downloads
588: Community Forums
589: Member Screenshots
590: Photo Gallery
591: Community Forums
592: Your Account
593: Photo Gallery
594: Your Account
595: Community Forums
596: Community Forums
597: Home
598: Photo Gallery
599: Home
600: Community Forums
601: Your Account
602: Home
603: Community Forums
604: Member Screenshots
605: Community Forums
606: Home
607: Photo Gallery
608: Community Forums
609: Photo Gallery
610: Home
611: Home
612: Community Forums
613: Photo Gallery
614: Member Screenshots
615: Community Forums
616: Community Forums
617: Home
618: Community Forums
619: Home
620: Downloads
621: Community Forums
622: Community Forums
623: Community Forums
624: Photo Gallery
625: Community Forums
626: Photo Gallery
627: Community Forums
628: Home
629: Community Forums
630: Photo Gallery
631: Member Screenshots
632: Community Forums
633: Community Forums
634: Community Forums
635: Home
636: Community Forums
637: Community Forums
638: Community Forums
639: Photo Gallery
640: Home
641: Member Screenshots
642: Community Forums
643: Community Forums
644: Community Forums
645: News Archive
646: Community Forums
647: Downloads
648: Photo Gallery
649: Photo Gallery
650: Photo Gallery
651: Community Forums
652: Member Screenshots
653: News
654: Community Forums
655: Your Account
656: Community Forums
657: Home
658: Community Forums
659: Community Forums
660: Home
661: Community Forums
662: Photo Gallery
663: Member Screenshots
664: News Archive
665: Community Forums
666: News Archive
667: Photo Gallery
668: Member Screenshots
669: Home
670: Community Forums
671: Member Screenshots
672: Downloads
673: Member Screenshots
674: Home
675: Community Forums
676: Downloads
677: Member Screenshots
678: Home
679: Downloads
680: Community Forums
681: Community Forums
682: Community Forums
683: Photo Gallery
684: Community Forums
685: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2006 4:35 am
Post subject: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...


Where to start!!!, It's good to be back on here, FINALLY! I'm the acting CSM for the rear-D of my unit here at Ft Hood so I've been very busy as of late with all the depolyments. Not to mention my move from Ft Irwin and the re-build of my computer. But now I'm ready to start posting again. These pictures are from the 1st Cav museum vehicles. The museum itself will be closed from 1 Aug through 14 September for a total rebuild and modification. The only exhibits open will be the OIF and out-door displays. I still have to get to the 4th ID museum before they move. They are being replaced by the 3rd ACR, which "un-cased" its colors last week. The 1st Cav museum was very impressive as far as its vehicles being clean and very "presentable". I have yet to go inside so it will be mid-September before I can do that. I hope to get to the future "range targets" this week behind range control and document their numbers and get some pictures as well. They look to be all M60's from the road way. I also found a very odd varient of an M113 in a "training" motorpool that I hope to sneak some pictures of.
To those of you who are able to get Ft Hood way, let me know so I can meet you and show you around. I have been extremely busy with CSM duties and other jobs I dont care to mention here so I haven't been able to get with the museum director. But I do know the post and can get you on. Just let me know if you're in the AO, you all are welcome in my home.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
jcneel
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 101
Location: Victoria, Texas
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2006 11:26 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

When is the 4TH ID museum supposed to move and where is it going? I might have to try and make a trip up that way before they go if I can make it.

cn
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2006 3:42 pm
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

- SFC_Jeff_Button

To those of you who are able to get Ft Hood way, let me know so I can meet you and show you around. I have been extremely busy with CSM duties and other jobs I dont care to mention here so I haven't been able to get with the museum director. But I do know the post and can get you on. Just let me know if you're in the AO, you all are welcome in my home.


Jeff - if you have any 'minor miscreants' sentence them to doing a thorough image walkaround of one of the exhibits for me will you Wink There are a couple there that I would like to add to the web site..

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2006 5:41 pm
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Hi JC! Hi Folks!

- jcneel

When is the 4TH ID museum supposed to move and where is it going?


I don't know the when part, but the where part under BRAC, has the 4th ID elements at Ft Hood moving to Ft. Carson Colorado and joining up with the one brigade that is already there.

If Carson is closer, just wait for them to arrive and set up.

The 3rd ACR which was at Carson before it when to Iraq is standing up at Ft. Hood as one of the new type 'Unit of Action' Heavy Brigades.

Spot Report!
Sgt, Scouts Out! Smile

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2006 11:09 pm
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Jim, which exhibits are you looking for? I'll see what I can do.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
binder001
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 363

PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 2:57 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Thanks for the nice photos Jeff. I hope as duties allow we can get occasional "walk arounds" of the goodies there.

Gary Binder
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 11:32 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Jeff, many thanks for the pictures! I still need some help with sorting out my 1st Cav Museum & 4th ID Museum inventory lists. I think I have some erroneous duplicates on my lists (the M10 Achilles for example). Here's the 1st Cav list:

2S1 SOV out
AMX-10P FRA/IRQ? out
BMP-1 SOV/IRQ? out
BTR-50PB SOV out Captured by Israel in 1967
EE-11 Urutu BRA out
M1E1 Abrams USA out
M3 Stuart USA/JPN? out Captured by IJA
M3A1 Stuart USA out RN 30851
M3A1 Half-Track USA out
M4(105) Sherman USA out
M4A1(75) Sherman USA out Painted RN 3015305
M4A3E8 Sherman Easy Eight USA out
M5A1 Stuart USA out
M7 Priest USA out
M8 Greyhound USA out
M10 GMC USA out
M10 Achilles USA out
M20 USA out
M24 Chaffee USA out
M26 Pershing USA out
M36B1 USA/YUG/HRV out Post-war assembly?
M40 USA out?
M41 Walker Bulldog USA out
M44 USA out
M48A5 Patton USA out Painted RN 0718842
M59 USA out
M60 USA out SN 504
M60A1 RISE USA out SN 8800
M60A3 USA out SN 3079A; has reactive armor
M74 USA out
M113A2 USA out
M114 USA out
M163 USA out
M728 CEV USA out
PT-76 SOV out
T43 Heavy Tank USA out
T-54/55 SOV out
T-55 ARV SOV out
T-62 SOV out
T-72M SOV/IRQ out
Type 69 CHN out

Many thanks,

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
HF_Evolution
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Dec 22, 2005
Posts: 14
Location: Wales UK
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 12:23 pm
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Nice picture of the Sherman, the British much to the disgust of the yanks stuch a 17pounder cann on in many of there Shermans, thinking the american gun was not good enough, they called this tank a Firefly. The Germans knicknamed them "Tommy Cookers", as when they were hit the brewed up (burst into flames, and the crews were usualy cooked. They were not at all as good as the german Arour, no way near, but there advantage was numbers. As one german tank commander said" As they came over the hill we destoyed them, all day, by the night the burning wrecks were all over the place and we congradulated our selves, next morning they came swarming over the hill again, we could not stop them and had to with draw."
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 12:30 pm
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Be gentle with him, Guys....
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:01 pm
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

- Doug_Kibbey
Be gentle with him, Guys....


Where to start, where to start? There is so much wrong with that post that I wonder if it is intentionally intended to create a controversy. New guy, one post, and he starts with that...

I'll leave it to the others to set him straight. We've done this too many times now!

C

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:49 pm
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

I have tried to reply and had my reply lost 3 times now ( I think we are having network problems here, or I am just having a severe case of fat fingers). I will attempt to reply this evening if no one else has

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:41 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Okay - I'm home now so lets lay out the defense of the Sherman

the 17pdr was a very good antitank gun, but it had poor HE performance. The 75mm had excellent HE performance but by 1944 mediocre armor piercing capability. The 75mm was being replaced by the 76mm gun (That is what the pictured tank is equipped with) The 76mm had moderate AP capability combined with good HE capability. Since most Shermans in American units spent their time dealing with antitank guns, buildings, machine gun emplacements, etc. HE performance was very important. The Sherman had one big advantage over the German tanks. It's powered turret was excellent. The Sherman used a hydraulic power system that was fast and smooth. The power drive for the panther ran off a power takeoff from the drivetrain. If the engine had a heavy load and the power traverse was used it could stall the engine. Consequently many units had policies that the power traverse was not to be used. I've seen some reports that it was sometimes diconnected completly. I've seen reports where Panthers and Shermans had meeting engagements where the Sherman was able to slew the turret around and get killing shots off before the Panther could swing it's gun around. There are also cases where in narrow streets the Pnather could not swing it's gun around due to hitting buildings or trees

'Tommy Cooker' or 'Ronson' - Yes early Shermans tended to burn when hit by German AP rounds. This was not due to the gasoline fuel. The ammo stowage in early Shermans was high and in the side sponsons. This combined with a very effective HE filler used by the Germans in their AP rounds led to a large number of secondary explosions. An interim solution was applique armor that was applied to Shermans to put heavier protection over these areas (and a few others that were found). The British did not use an explosive filler in their AP rounds. They used either solid shot or American AP that had the explosive filler removed (I assume they were delivered with the cavity empty and that they did notactually remove the explosive charge that the Americans designed the rounds for). So even if a British tank penetrated a German tank all it did was punch a hole in the tank. There would be some secondary damage (There are very few places inside a tank you wouldn't hit some other equipment) but nothing like the explosive charge in the German round would cause.

'The German Tanks were better armored than the Sherman' - Yes. The Panther was about 45 tons compared to the Shermans 35 tons. Ten tons of weight is a lot of armor. The U.S. had to design the Sherman to be shipped half way around the world to be used. The Germans had to send a Panther 500-1000 miles from the factory, generally via rail or road shipment. The Americans had to plan un unloading Shermans in ports where the heavy lifting equipment was out of commision or across beaches where ther was no heavy cargo handling equipment at all. So they had to be able to unload using ships cargo gear. This limited the size of the vehicle.

The German tanks may have been better armored but the Sherman was much more reliable. The U.S. demanded much higher reliability from it's vehicles than other armies did. I believe this was due to two factors. Again the U.S. knew it would be operating at the end of a very long supply line. They would not be able to send tanks back to stateside depots for major maintenance. The Germans assumed that the tank would be returned to the factory for major overhauls. Also the American automotive industry was probably the most advanced in the world at the time they could mass produce heavy equipment to good tolerances better than anyone else in the world.

When the Sherman entered production there was supposed to be a heavy tank to compliment the Sherman. In 1941-42 the Sherman was as good as any other medium tank in the world. The M-6 Heavy tank was being tested but was given a lower priority than the Sherman and the Stuart.

The M-6 had problems with the transmission (it was probably at least as reliable as any other countries heavy tank but did not meat American reliability standards) and given the extreme shipping constraints of the 1942-early 44 period when they were attempting to build up an army in the U.K. in the face of the Uboat campaign it was decided to not give the very heavy M-6 (50-60 tons) a high priority.

When a heavy tank did become available logistics again reared its demanding head. The Pershing was wider than the Sherman. This meant that every Bailey Bridge would have to be modified or risk being damaged by the wider tracks of the Pershing. So they were held back until after most of the major rivers were crossed (and the port of Antwerp with it's heavy cargo gear was operational)

There was a very good article titled "Tank Myths" comparing the Sherman to it's chief rival for fame (not The Panther, the T-34) in the September/October 2001 issue of Armor by Charles M. Bailey the author of "Faint Praise" a book I have been looking for for a long time since it is considered to be one of the definitive books on US WWII tank development

I think only one other tank in WWII could even compare to the Sherman. The T-34 and the Sherman both started life at about the same time and continued to be built and improved throughout the war. The M4A3E8 was a far different tank from the M4A1 'Michael' that was originally delivered to the British in early '42

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 1:13 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Bob, I'll play devil's advocate for the sake of discussion...

- bsmart


'The German Tanks were better armored than the Sherman' - Yes. The Panther was about 45 tons compared to the Shermans 35 tons. Ten tons of weight is a lot of armor. The U.S. had to design the Sherman to be shipped half way around the world to be used. The Germans had to send a Panther 500-1000 miles from the factory, generally via rail or road shipment. The Americans had to plan un unloading Shermans in ports where the heavy lifting equipment was out of commision or across beaches where ther was no heavy cargo handling equipment at all. So they had to be able to unload using ships cargo gear. This limited the size of the vehicle.


Hindsight being 20-20 and primary role of the Sherman as infantry support granted, but if the traditional wisdom holds true that it took 3-4 Shermans to take out 1 Panther or Tiger - doesnt that mean the US ended up shipping 105-140 tons per kill? Seems like a smaller number of heavy tanks, even in the Panther weight class, would have been more efficient - shipping-wise - than all those Shermans... In fact, it would seem like there was a lot of wasted tonnage shipped...

Even if you grant that the primary role of the Sherman was infantry support, seems like a high-low mix might have been appropriate. The heavier Panther-class tanks could have been offloaded using LSTs no? Even M6s and T23s, with heavier armor than the Sherman, might have been a good stop-gap measure until the Pershing arrived...


The M-6 had problems with the transmission (it was probably at least as reliable as any other countries heavy tank but did not meat American reliability standards) and given the extreme shipping constraints of the 1942-early 44 period when they were attempting to build up an army in the U.K. in the face of the Uboat campaign it was decided to not give the very heavy M-6 (50-60 tons) a high priority.


Again, hindsight 20-20, seems like M6s or T23s would have been a better use of shipping constraints than some of those Shermans...


When a heavy tank did become available logistics again reared its demanding head. The Pershing was wider than the Sherman. This meant that every Bailey Bridge would have to be modified or risk being damaged by the wider tracks of the Pershing. So they were held back until after most of the major rivers were crossed (and the port of Antwerp with it's heavy cargo gear was operational)


How come this was only a concern for the Americans? Sure, there are lots of stories of Tigers, etc not being able to cross bridges, but it doesnt seem like this was a big concern for the Germany army... Point being, if the Germans can get around the same rivers & bridges (admittedly in retreat), seems like Pershings could have done the same...


The M4A3E8 was a far different tank from the M4A1 'Michael' that was originally delivered to the British in early '42


Granted, but it has to seem that the Armor folks were a little too obsessive over the "tank" being an infantry support weapon. Even a mix of US Sherman Fireflies - not taking up more more weight at all, but with some additional ammo supply headaches - would have been a good decision. What would have been the impact of US mass-produced Fireflies been on the battlefield in 1944?

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 1:57 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

I'm having trouble with the multiple level quotes so

Did we actually need more shipping because it took multiple Shermans to handel a 'Cat' That assumes that if you had brought over a limited number of 'anti-Cat' tanks you would be able to have one where you needed it when you needed it. Isn't that similar to the Tank destroyer doctrine of having some unist who were supposed to hunt enemy tanks? Problem is you can't know where they would show up so everyone has to be ready to handle the enemy tanks.

Why was the logistics only a US problem (actually an allied problem) Well The defender has some options on when to drop bridges (unless the zoomies get them first :-)) And there were times when German tanks were trapped because bridges had been destroyed. And one of the factors that slowed down the German ardennes spearheads in December of 44 were the tenacious defense of bridges by American Engineer units.

I don't think the U.S. obscessed on 'infantry support' If anything I think they obcessed on 'Tanks shouldn't fight tanks' and the use of tanks as a breakthrough weapon to run rampant in the enemies backfield once a hole had been made in the line. In that role the reliable Sherman excelled.

The big problem would have been building enough 17pdrs. It would have taken too long to 'americanize' it to be built in American factories (The British weapons that were adapted for U.S. production had been decided on early in the war when they had the 12 months or so needed to ramp up production lines. I've always thought there should have been a 90mm Sherman. The M36 showed it would fit. It was already in U.S. production. so could have been incorporated much faster than a new British gun.

There was an offer by Ordnance to supply 100+ M6s (with 105mm guns, not howitzers but long guns) to Europe but the command didn't want the logistics issues.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:00 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Hi Folks!

Good post Bob! Good counter post Neil!

A number of other factors that also impacted the Sherman, but then there is so much to the Sheman story, are:

the effect of General McNair on just about everything,
the mistaken belief that the 76mm and it's round could deal with Panther and Tiger tanks prior to June 6, 1944,
the mistaken doctrine that the tank destroyers could take care of all German armor,
the fact that combat engineer bridge units didn't have a pontoon bridge system in the ETO, until late 1944, that could safely support a vehicle as heavy as the Sherman on German rivers,

I am starting to get the feeling that we all need to get together and write a book about all the points and couter points of the Sherman. That way we can just link new guys like 'HF Evolution' over to it.

Bottom, line, it and the T34 won the war and that is the only thing that counts in the end. To 'HF Evolution' that comes from a CIA that once though much like your post.

Sgt, Scouts Out! Smile

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.


Last edited by Roy_A_Lingle on Tue Aug 01, 2006 7:54 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum