±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 689
Total: 689
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Home
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Downloads
06: Member Screenshots
07: Community Forums
08: Photo Gallery
09: News
10: Home
11: Photo Gallery
12: Community Forums
13: Photo Gallery
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Member Screenshots
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Photo Gallery
20: News Archive
21: Photo Gallery
22: Member Screenshots
23: Community Forums
24: Member Screenshots
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Photo Gallery
28: Community Forums
29: Home
30: Home
31: Home
32: Community Forums
33: Photo Gallery
34: Home
35: Photo Gallery
36: Community Forums
37: Member Screenshots
38: Photo Gallery
39: Downloads
40: Downloads
41: Community Forums
42: Member Screenshots
43: Community Forums
44: Photo Gallery
45: News
46: News Archive
47: Member Screenshots
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Statistics
51: Home
52: Member Screenshots
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Downloads
57: Member Screenshots
58: Photo Gallery
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Downloads
62: Community Forums
63: Search
64: Photo Gallery
65: Downloads
66: Your Account
67: Home
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Photo Gallery
74: Photo Gallery
75: Photo Gallery
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Photo Gallery
79: Home
80: Community Forums
81: Photo Gallery
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: Member Screenshots
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: Downloads
88: Photo Gallery
89: Member Screenshots
90: Community Forums
91: Home
92: Member Screenshots
93: Downloads
94: Photo Gallery
95: Community Forums
96: Member Screenshots
97: News Archive
98: Photo Gallery
99: Community Forums
100: Community Forums
101: Photo Gallery
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Home
105: Community Forums
106: Photo Gallery
107: Home
108: Photo Gallery
109: Home
110: Community Forums
111: Photo Gallery
112: Member Screenshots
113: Community Forums
114: News Archive
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Member Screenshots
119: Photo Gallery
120: Community Forums
121: Member Screenshots
122: News Archive
123: Community Forums
124: Photo Gallery
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Photo Gallery
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Photo Gallery
132: Statistics
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: News Archive
137: Downloads
138: Home
139: Photo Gallery
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Your Account
143: Photo Gallery
144: Photo Gallery
145: Photo Gallery
146: Home
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Photo Gallery
151: Photo Gallery
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Home
157: News Archive
158: Home
159: Member Screenshots
160: Home
161: Statistics
162: Community Forums
163: Member Screenshots
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Member Screenshots
167: Member Screenshots
168: Community Forums
169: Photo Gallery
170: Community Forums
171: Photo Gallery
172: Photo Gallery
173: Member Screenshots
174: Community Forums
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Downloads
178: Community Forums
179: Photo Gallery
180: Community Forums
181: Home
182: Community Forums
183: Member Screenshots
184: News Archive
185: Photo Gallery
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: Member Screenshots
189: Photo Gallery
190: Photo Gallery
191: Home
192: Member Screenshots
193: Photo Gallery
194: Member Screenshots
195: News Archive
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Photo Gallery
200: Community Forums
201: Downloads
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums
204: Member Screenshots
205: Photo Gallery
206: Community Forums
207: Photo Gallery
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Photo Gallery
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Photo Gallery
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Home
218: Downloads
219: Member Screenshots
220: Community Forums
221: Your Account
222: Community Forums
223: Member Screenshots
224: Community Forums
225: Member Screenshots
226: Photo Gallery
227: Community Forums
228: Home
229: Home
230: Home
231: Home
232: Member Screenshots
233: News Archive
234: Home
235: Downloads
236: Photo Gallery
237: Member Screenshots
238: Community Forums
239: Photo Gallery
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: Member Screenshots
243: Downloads
244: Photo Gallery
245: Home
246: Home
247: Community Forums
248: Home
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Home
253: Downloads
254: Community Forums
255: Community Forums
256: Home
257: Home
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Home
262: Community Forums
263: Downloads
264: Downloads
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Home
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Home
271: Home
272: Downloads
273: News Archive
274: Member Screenshots
275: Member Screenshots
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: Community Forums
279: Community Forums
280: Your Account
281: Community Forums
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Downloads
286: Community Forums
287: Photo Gallery
288: Photo Gallery
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Home
292: Home
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Home
296: Community Forums
297: Home
298: Photo Gallery
299: Community Forums
300: Home
301: Community Forums
302: Member Screenshots
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Home
306: Member Screenshots
307: Photo Gallery
308: News Archive
309: Home
310: Community Forums
311: Photo Gallery
312: Community Forums
313: Photo Gallery
314: Community Forums
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Home
318: Community Forums
319: Home
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Home
323: Home
324: Home
325: Photo Gallery
326: Photo Gallery
327: Community Forums
328: Community Forums
329: Photo Gallery
330: Photo Gallery
331: Home
332: Photo Gallery
333: Home
334: Photo Gallery
335: Member Screenshots
336: Community Forums
337: Member Screenshots
338: Photo Gallery
339: Statistics
340: Photo Gallery
341: Downloads
342: Member Screenshots
343: Community Forums
344: Community Forums
345: Community Forums
346: Community Forums
347: Photo Gallery
348: Downloads
349: Member Screenshots
350: Photo Gallery
351: Photo Gallery
352: Photo Gallery
353: Community Forums
354: Member Screenshots
355: Community Forums
356: Photo Gallery
357: Member Screenshots
358: Home
359: Home
360: Downloads
361: Community Forums
362: Photo Gallery
363: Community Forums
364: Downloads
365: Photo Gallery
366: Home
367: Community Forums
368: Community Forums
369: Photo Gallery
370: Community Forums
371: Community Forums
372: Member Screenshots
373: Member Screenshots
374: Community Forums
375: Community Forums
376: News Archive
377: Downloads
378: Member Screenshots
379: Home
380: Photo Gallery
381: Photo Gallery
382: Community Forums
383: Photo Gallery
384: Home
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Home
388: Community Forums
389: Statistics
390: Home
391: Home
392: Community Forums
393: Photo Gallery
394: Community Forums
395: Member Screenshots
396: Home
397: Community Forums
398: Photo Gallery
399: Community Forums
400: Member Screenshots
401: Community Forums
402: Community Forums
403: Community Forums
404: Photo Gallery
405: Home
406: Photo Gallery
407: Member Screenshots
408: Photo Gallery
409: Home
410: Home
411: Home
412: Community Forums
413: Photo Gallery
414: Community Forums
415: Downloads
416: Community Forums
417: Community Forums
418: Member Screenshots
419: News
420: Community Forums
421: Photo Gallery
422: Community Forums
423: Photo Gallery
424: Community Forums
425: Photo Gallery
426: Statistics
427: Photo Gallery
428: Community Forums
429: Member Screenshots
430: Member Screenshots
431: Downloads
432: Community Forums
433: Community Forums
434: Home
435: Community Forums
436: Downloads
437: Community Forums
438: Community Forums
439: Photo Gallery
440: Home
441: Community Forums
442: Community Forums
443: Community Forums
444: Community Forums
445: Community Forums
446: Community Forums
447: Downloads
448: Photo Gallery
449: Home
450: Your Account
451: Photo Gallery
452: Home
453: News Archive
454: Photo Gallery
455: Member Screenshots
456: Downloads
457: Community Forums
458: Community Forums
459: Community Forums
460: Community Forums
461: Photo Gallery
462: Photo Gallery
463: Community Forums
464: Member Screenshots
465: Photo Gallery
466: Photo Gallery
467: News
468: Your Account
469: Community Forums
470: Photo Gallery
471: Community Forums
472: Downloads
473: Photo Gallery
474: Home
475: Community Forums
476: Community Forums
477: Photo Gallery
478: Community Forums
479: Community Forums
480: Member Screenshots
481: Photo Gallery
482: Member Screenshots
483: Member Screenshots
484: Photo Gallery
485: Photo Gallery
486: Photo Gallery
487: Community Forums
488: Home
489: Community Forums
490: Photo Gallery
491: Home
492: Downloads
493: Photo Gallery
494: Member Screenshots
495: Home
496: Home
497: Downloads
498: Home
499: Home
500: Community Forums
501: Your Account
502: Statistics
503: Home
504: Community Forums
505: Community Forums
506: Member Screenshots
507: Member Screenshots
508: Home
509: Downloads
510: Home
511: Photo Gallery
512: Community Forums
513: Photo Gallery
514: Community Forums
515: Community Forums
516: Member Screenshots
517: Community Forums
518: Home
519: Your Account
520: Community Forums
521: Community Forums
522: Photo Gallery
523: Community Forums
524: Photo Gallery
525: Home
526: News
527: Home
528: Community Forums
529: News
530: Community Forums
531: Photo Gallery
532: Community Forums
533: Home
534: Community Forums
535: Community Forums
536: Community Forums
537: Photo Gallery
538: Photo Gallery
539: Member Screenshots
540: Community Forums
541: Community Forums
542: Community Forums
543: Downloads
544: Community Forums
545: Statistics
546: Member Screenshots
547: Community Forums
548: Home
549: Community Forums
550: Member Screenshots
551: Home
552: Home
553: Community Forums
554: Community Forums
555: Home
556: Community Forums
557: Home
558: Community Forums
559: Member Screenshots
560: Photo Gallery
561: Home
562: Home
563: Home
564: Home
565: Photo Gallery
566: News Archive
567: Photo Gallery
568: Home
569: Downloads
570: Home
571: Downloads
572: Photo Gallery
573: Community Forums
574: Community Forums
575: Photo Gallery
576: Community Forums
577: Photo Gallery
578: Member Screenshots
579: Photo Gallery
580: Home
581: Community Forums
582: News Archive
583: Downloads
584: Home
585: Downloads
586: Community Forums
587: Community Forums
588: Photo Gallery
589: Your Account
590: Photo Gallery
591: Home
592: Photo Gallery
593: Member Screenshots
594: Community Forums
595: Community Forums
596: Community Forums
597: Member Screenshots
598: Photo Gallery
599: Photo Gallery
600: Home
601: Member Screenshots
602: Home
603: Home
604: Community Forums
605: Member Screenshots
606: Community Forums
607: Member Screenshots
608: Home
609: Member Screenshots
610: Photo Gallery
611: Downloads
612: Member Screenshots
613: Community Forums
614: Photo Gallery
615: Member Screenshots
616: Community Forums
617: Home
618: News Archive
619: Member Screenshots
620: Home
621: Member Screenshots
622: Member Screenshots
623: Community Forums
624: Photo Gallery
625: Photo Gallery
626: Downloads
627: Member Screenshots
628: Statistics
629: Community Forums
630: Home
631: Home
632: Community Forums
633: Member Screenshots
634: Community Forums
635: Home
636: Home
637: Community Forums
638: Home
639: Statistics
640: Home
641: Community Forums
642: Home
643: Community Forums
644: Community Forums
645: Community Forums
646: Home
647: Home
648: Downloads
649: Community Forums
650: Photo Gallery
651: Community Forums
652: Community Forums
653: Community Forums
654: Community Forums
655: Member Screenshots
656: Community Forums
657: Community Forums
658: Member Screenshots
659: Photo Gallery
660: Community Forums
661: Member Screenshots
662: Home
663: Home
664: Community Forums
665: Home
666: Home
667: Home
668: Community Forums
669: Community Forums
670: Photo Gallery
671: Community Forums
672: Photo Gallery
673: Community Forums
674: Member Screenshots
675: Home
676: News Archive
677: Downloads
678: Community Forums
679: Community Forums
680: Photo Gallery
681: Community Forums
682: News Archive
683: Photo Gallery
684: News Archive
685: Member Screenshots
686: Photo Gallery
687: Community Forums
688: Photo Gallery
689: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2006 4:35 am
Post subject: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...


Where to start!!!, It's good to be back on here, FINALLY! I'm the acting CSM for the rear-D of my unit here at Ft Hood so I've been very busy as of late with all the depolyments. Not to mention my move from Ft Irwin and the re-build of my computer. But now I'm ready to start posting again. These pictures are from the 1st Cav museum vehicles. The museum itself will be closed from 1 Aug through 14 September for a total rebuild and modification. The only exhibits open will be the OIF and out-door displays. I still have to get to the 4th ID museum before they move. They are being replaced by the 3rd ACR, which "un-cased" its colors last week. The 1st Cav museum was very impressive as far as its vehicles being clean and very "presentable". I have yet to go inside so it will be mid-September before I can do that. I hope to get to the future "range targets" this week behind range control and document their numbers and get some pictures as well. They look to be all M60's from the road way. I also found a very odd varient of an M113 in a "training" motorpool that I hope to sneak some pictures of.
To those of you who are able to get Ft Hood way, let me know so I can meet you and show you around. I have been extremely busy with CSM duties and other jobs I dont care to mention here so I haven't been able to get with the museum director. But I do know the post and can get you on. Just let me know if you're in the AO, you all are welcome in my home.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
jcneel
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 101
Location: Victoria, Texas
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2006 11:26 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

When is the 4TH ID museum supposed to move and where is it going? I might have to try and make a trip up that way before they go if I can make it.

cn
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2006 3:42 pm
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

- SFC_Jeff_Button

To those of you who are able to get Ft Hood way, let me know so I can meet you and show you around. I have been extremely busy with CSM duties and other jobs I dont care to mention here so I haven't been able to get with the museum director. But I do know the post and can get you on. Just let me know if you're in the AO, you all are welcome in my home.


Jeff - if you have any 'minor miscreants' sentence them to doing a thorough image walkaround of one of the exhibits for me will you Wink There are a couple there that I would like to add to the web site..

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2006 5:41 pm
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Hi JC! Hi Folks!

- jcneel

When is the 4TH ID museum supposed to move and where is it going?


I don't know the when part, but the where part under BRAC, has the 4th ID elements at Ft Hood moving to Ft. Carson Colorado and joining up with the one brigade that is already there.

If Carson is closer, just wait for them to arrive and set up.

The 3rd ACR which was at Carson before it when to Iraq is standing up at Ft. Hood as one of the new type 'Unit of Action' Heavy Brigades.

Spot Report!
Sgt, Scouts Out! Smile

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sun Jul 30, 2006 11:09 pm
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Jim, which exhibits are you looking for? I'll see what I can do.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
binder001
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 363

PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 2:57 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Thanks for the nice photos Jeff. I hope as duties allow we can get occasional "walk arounds" of the goodies there.

Gary Binder
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 11:32 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Jeff, many thanks for the pictures! I still need some help with sorting out my 1st Cav Museum & 4th ID Museum inventory lists. I think I have some erroneous duplicates on my lists (the M10 Achilles for example). Here's the 1st Cav list:

2S1 SOV out
AMX-10P FRA/IRQ? out
BMP-1 SOV/IRQ? out
BTR-50PB SOV out Captured by Israel in 1967
EE-11 Urutu BRA out
M1E1 Abrams USA out
M3 Stuart USA/JPN? out Captured by IJA
M3A1 Stuart USA out RN 30851
M3A1 Half-Track USA out
M4(105) Sherman USA out
M4A1(75) Sherman USA out Painted RN 3015305
M4A3E8 Sherman Easy Eight USA out
M5A1 Stuart USA out
M7 Priest USA out
M8 Greyhound USA out
M10 GMC USA out
M10 Achilles USA out
M20 USA out
M24 Chaffee USA out
M26 Pershing USA out
M36B1 USA/YUG/HRV out Post-war assembly?
M40 USA out?
M41 Walker Bulldog USA out
M44 USA out
M48A5 Patton USA out Painted RN 0718842
M59 USA out
M60 USA out SN 504
M60A1 RISE USA out SN 8800
M60A3 USA out SN 3079A; has reactive armor
M74 USA out
M113A2 USA out
M114 USA out
M163 USA out
M728 CEV USA out
PT-76 SOV out
T43 Heavy Tank USA out
T-54/55 SOV out
T-55 ARV SOV out
T-62 SOV out
T-72M SOV/IRQ out
Type 69 CHN out

Many thanks,

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
HF_Evolution
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Dec 22, 2005
Posts: 14
Location: Wales UK
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 12:23 pm
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Nice picture of the Sherman, the British much to the disgust of the yanks stuch a 17pounder cann on in many of there Shermans, thinking the american gun was not good enough, they called this tank a Firefly. The Germans knicknamed them "Tommy Cookers", as when they were hit the brewed up (burst into flames, and the crews were usualy cooked. They were not at all as good as the german Arour, no way near, but there advantage was numbers. As one german tank commander said" As they came over the hill we destoyed them, all day, by the night the burning wrecks were all over the place and we congradulated our selves, next morning they came swarming over the hill again, we could not stop them and had to with draw."
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 12:30 pm
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Be gentle with him, Guys....
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:01 pm
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

- Doug_Kibbey
Be gentle with him, Guys....


Where to start, where to start? There is so much wrong with that post that I wonder if it is intentionally intended to create a controversy. New guy, one post, and he starts with that...

I'll leave it to the others to set him straight. We've done this too many times now!

C

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:49 pm
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

I have tried to reply and had my reply lost 3 times now ( I think we are having network problems here, or I am just having a severe case of fat fingers). I will attempt to reply this evening if no one else has

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:41 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Okay - I'm home now so lets lay out the defense of the Sherman

the 17pdr was a very good antitank gun, but it had poor HE performance. The 75mm had excellent HE performance but by 1944 mediocre armor piercing capability. The 75mm was being replaced by the 76mm gun (That is what the pictured tank is equipped with) The 76mm had moderate AP capability combined with good HE capability. Since most Shermans in American units spent their time dealing with antitank guns, buildings, machine gun emplacements, etc. HE performance was very important. The Sherman had one big advantage over the German tanks. It's powered turret was excellent. The Sherman used a hydraulic power system that was fast and smooth. The power drive for the panther ran off a power takeoff from the drivetrain. If the engine had a heavy load and the power traverse was used it could stall the engine. Consequently many units had policies that the power traverse was not to be used. I've seen some reports that it was sometimes diconnected completly. I've seen reports where Panthers and Shermans had meeting engagements where the Sherman was able to slew the turret around and get killing shots off before the Panther could swing it's gun around. There are also cases where in narrow streets the Pnather could not swing it's gun around due to hitting buildings or trees

'Tommy Cooker' or 'Ronson' - Yes early Shermans tended to burn when hit by German AP rounds. This was not due to the gasoline fuel. The ammo stowage in early Shermans was high and in the side sponsons. This combined with a very effective HE filler used by the Germans in their AP rounds led to a large number of secondary explosions. An interim solution was applique armor that was applied to Shermans to put heavier protection over these areas (and a few others that were found). The British did not use an explosive filler in their AP rounds. They used either solid shot or American AP that had the explosive filler removed (I assume they were delivered with the cavity empty and that they did notactually remove the explosive charge that the Americans designed the rounds for). So even if a British tank penetrated a German tank all it did was punch a hole in the tank. There would be some secondary damage (There are very few places inside a tank you wouldn't hit some other equipment) but nothing like the explosive charge in the German round would cause.

'The German Tanks were better armored than the Sherman' - Yes. The Panther was about 45 tons compared to the Shermans 35 tons. Ten tons of weight is a lot of armor. The U.S. had to design the Sherman to be shipped half way around the world to be used. The Germans had to send a Panther 500-1000 miles from the factory, generally via rail or road shipment. The Americans had to plan un unloading Shermans in ports where the heavy lifting equipment was out of commision or across beaches where ther was no heavy cargo handling equipment at all. So they had to be able to unload using ships cargo gear. This limited the size of the vehicle.

The German tanks may have been better armored but the Sherman was much more reliable. The U.S. demanded much higher reliability from it's vehicles than other armies did. I believe this was due to two factors. Again the U.S. knew it would be operating at the end of a very long supply line. They would not be able to send tanks back to stateside depots for major maintenance. The Germans assumed that the tank would be returned to the factory for major overhauls. Also the American automotive industry was probably the most advanced in the world at the time they could mass produce heavy equipment to good tolerances better than anyone else in the world.

When the Sherman entered production there was supposed to be a heavy tank to compliment the Sherman. In 1941-42 the Sherman was as good as any other medium tank in the world. The M-6 Heavy tank was being tested but was given a lower priority than the Sherman and the Stuart.

The M-6 had problems with the transmission (it was probably at least as reliable as any other countries heavy tank but did not meat American reliability standards) and given the extreme shipping constraints of the 1942-early 44 period when they were attempting to build up an army in the U.K. in the face of the Uboat campaign it was decided to not give the very heavy M-6 (50-60 tons) a high priority.

When a heavy tank did become available logistics again reared its demanding head. The Pershing was wider than the Sherman. This meant that every Bailey Bridge would have to be modified or risk being damaged by the wider tracks of the Pershing. So they were held back until after most of the major rivers were crossed (and the port of Antwerp with it's heavy cargo gear was operational)

There was a very good article titled "Tank Myths" comparing the Sherman to it's chief rival for fame (not The Panther, the T-34) in the September/October 2001 issue of Armor by Charles M. Bailey the author of "Faint Praise" a book I have been looking for for a long time since it is considered to be one of the definitive books on US WWII tank development

I think only one other tank in WWII could even compare to the Sherman. The T-34 and the Sherman both started life at about the same time and continued to be built and improved throughout the war. The M4A3E8 was a far different tank from the M4A1 'Michael' that was originally delivered to the British in early '42

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 1:13 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Bob, I'll play devil's advocate for the sake of discussion...

- bsmart


'The German Tanks were better armored than the Sherman' - Yes. The Panther was about 45 tons compared to the Shermans 35 tons. Ten tons of weight is a lot of armor. The U.S. had to design the Sherman to be shipped half way around the world to be used. The Germans had to send a Panther 500-1000 miles from the factory, generally via rail or road shipment. The Americans had to plan un unloading Shermans in ports where the heavy lifting equipment was out of commision or across beaches where ther was no heavy cargo handling equipment at all. So they had to be able to unload using ships cargo gear. This limited the size of the vehicle.


Hindsight being 20-20 and primary role of the Sherman as infantry support granted, but if the traditional wisdom holds true that it took 3-4 Shermans to take out 1 Panther or Tiger - doesnt that mean the US ended up shipping 105-140 tons per kill? Seems like a smaller number of heavy tanks, even in the Panther weight class, would have been more efficient - shipping-wise - than all those Shermans... In fact, it would seem like there was a lot of wasted tonnage shipped...

Even if you grant that the primary role of the Sherman was infantry support, seems like a high-low mix might have been appropriate. The heavier Panther-class tanks could have been offloaded using LSTs no? Even M6s and T23s, with heavier armor than the Sherman, might have been a good stop-gap measure until the Pershing arrived...


The M-6 had problems with the transmission (it was probably at least as reliable as any other countries heavy tank but did not meat American reliability standards) and given the extreme shipping constraints of the 1942-early 44 period when they were attempting to build up an army in the U.K. in the face of the Uboat campaign it was decided to not give the very heavy M-6 (50-60 tons) a high priority.


Again, hindsight 20-20, seems like M6s or T23s would have been a better use of shipping constraints than some of those Shermans...


When a heavy tank did become available logistics again reared its demanding head. The Pershing was wider than the Sherman. This meant that every Bailey Bridge would have to be modified or risk being damaged by the wider tracks of the Pershing. So they were held back until after most of the major rivers were crossed (and the port of Antwerp with it's heavy cargo gear was operational)


How come this was only a concern for the Americans? Sure, there are lots of stories of Tigers, etc not being able to cross bridges, but it doesnt seem like this was a big concern for the Germany army... Point being, if the Germans can get around the same rivers & bridges (admittedly in retreat), seems like Pershings could have done the same...


The M4A3E8 was a far different tank from the M4A1 'Michael' that was originally delivered to the British in early '42


Granted, but it has to seem that the Armor folks were a little too obsessive over the "tank" being an infantry support weapon. Even a mix of US Sherman Fireflies - not taking up more more weight at all, but with some additional ammo supply headaches - would have been a good decision. What would have been the impact of US mass-produced Fireflies been on the battlefield in 1944?

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 1:57 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

I'm having trouble with the multiple level quotes so

Did we actually need more shipping because it took multiple Shermans to handel a 'Cat' That assumes that if you had brought over a limited number of 'anti-Cat' tanks you would be able to have one where you needed it when you needed it. Isn't that similar to the Tank destroyer doctrine of having some unist who were supposed to hunt enemy tanks? Problem is you can't know where they would show up so everyone has to be ready to handle the enemy tanks.

Why was the logistics only a US problem (actually an allied problem) Well The defender has some options on when to drop bridges (unless the zoomies get them first :-)) And there were times when German tanks were trapped because bridges had been destroyed. And one of the factors that slowed down the German ardennes spearheads in December of 44 were the tenacious defense of bridges by American Engineer units.

I don't think the U.S. obscessed on 'infantry support' If anything I think they obcessed on 'Tanks shouldn't fight tanks' and the use of tanks as a breakthrough weapon to run rampant in the enemies backfield once a hole had been made in the line. In that role the reliable Sherman excelled.

The big problem would have been building enough 17pdrs. It would have taken too long to 'americanize' it to be built in American factories (The British weapons that were adapted for U.S. production had been decided on early in the war when they had the 12 months or so needed to ramp up production lines. I've always thought there should have been a 90mm Sherman. The M36 showed it would fit. It was already in U.S. production. so could have been incorporated much faster than a new British gun.

There was an offer by Ordnance to supply 100+ M6s (with 105mm guns, not howitzers but long guns) to Europe but the command didn't want the logistics issues.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:00 am
Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Hi Folks!

Good post Bob! Good counter post Neil!

A number of other factors that also impacted the Sherman, but then there is so much to the Sheman story, are:

the effect of General McNair on just about everything,
the mistaken belief that the 76mm and it's round could deal with Panther and Tiger tanks prior to June 6, 1944,
the mistaken doctrine that the tank destroyers could take care of all German armor,
the fact that combat engineer bridge units didn't have a pontoon bridge system in the ETO, until late 1944, that could safely support a vehicle as heavy as the Sherman on German rivers,

I am starting to get the feeling that we all need to get together and write a book about all the points and couter points of the Sherman. That way we can just link new guys like 'HF Evolution' over to it.

Bottom, line, it and the T34 won the war and that is the only thing that counts in the end. To 'HF Evolution' that comes from a CIA that once though much like your post.

Sgt, Scouts Out! Smile

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.


Last edited by Roy_A_Lingle on Tue Aug 01, 2006 7:54 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum