±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 1903
Total: 1903
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: News Archive
03: Home
04: Home
05: Member Screenshots
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Home
09: News Archive
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Home
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Downloads
20: Community Forums
21: Member Screenshots
22: Community Forums
23: Community Forums
24: Photo Gallery
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Member Screenshots
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Photo Gallery
34: Community Forums
35: Community Forums
36: Downloads
37: Photo Gallery
38: News Archive
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Downloads
42: Statistics
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Member Screenshots
46: Community Forums
47: Home
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Member Screenshots
51: Downloads
52: Community Forums
53: Member Screenshots
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Community Forums
60: Member Screenshots
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Member Screenshots
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Member Screenshots
76: Photo Gallery
77: Member Screenshots
78: Member Screenshots
79: Community Forums
80: Member Screenshots
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: Home
84: Member Screenshots
85: Member Screenshots
86: Photo Gallery
87: Home
88: Home
89: Member Screenshots
90: News
91: Statistics
92: Community Forums
93: Photo Gallery
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Community Forums
97: Photo Gallery
98: Community Forums
99: Community Forums
100: Home
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Member Screenshots
105: Downloads
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Member Screenshots
109: Downloads
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Photo Gallery
113: Photo Gallery
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Home
119: Community Forums
120: Community Forums
121: Member Screenshots
122: Community Forums
123: Community Forums
124: Member Screenshots
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: Community Forums
129: Member Screenshots
130: Home
131: Community Forums
132: Photo Gallery
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Photo Gallery
136: Community Forums
137: Photo Gallery
138: Community Forums
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Downloads
143: Community Forums
144: Member Screenshots
145: Member Screenshots
146: Photo Gallery
147: Community Forums
148: Photo Gallery
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Photo Gallery
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: News Archive
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Member Screenshots
162: Community Forums
163: Photo Gallery
164: Community Forums
165: Statistics
166: Community Forums
167: News Archive
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: News Archive
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Photo Gallery
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Supporters
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: Community Forums
182: Community Forums
183: Member Screenshots
184: Community Forums
185: Member Screenshots
186: Community Forums
187: Downloads
188: Community Forums
189: Downloads
190: Community Forums
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Photo Gallery
196: Community Forums
197: Downloads
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Photo Gallery
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Photo Gallery
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Statistics
221: Community Forums
222: Member Screenshots
223: Member Screenshots
224: Community Forums
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Photo Gallery
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Photo Gallery
233: Community Forums
234: Statistics
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Member Screenshots
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Home
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Member Screenshots
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Member Screenshots
252: Community Forums
253: Photo Gallery
254: Community Forums
255: Community Forums
256: Community Forums
257: Member Screenshots
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Member Screenshots
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Photo Gallery
272: Community Forums
273: Community Forums
274: Photo Gallery
275: Home
276: Community Forums
277: Downloads
278: Community Forums
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Member Screenshots
285: Photo Gallery
286: Community Forums
287: Community Forums
288: Community Forums
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Community Forums
293: Member Screenshots
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Photo Gallery
297: Photo Gallery
298: Community Forums
299: Home
300: Member Screenshots
301: Community Forums
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Home
305: Community Forums
306: Community Forums
307: Community Forums
308: Community Forums
309: Community Forums
310: Community Forums
311: Home
312: Photo Gallery
313: Community Forums
314: Photo Gallery
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Community Forums
324: Community Forums
325: Community Forums
326: Photo Gallery
327: Community Forums
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: Community Forums
331: Home
332: Community Forums
333: Community Forums
334: Member Screenshots
335: Community Forums
336: Statistics
337: Home
338: Community Forums
339: Community Forums
340: Photo Gallery
341: Community Forums
342: Home
343: Member Screenshots
344: Downloads
345: Community Forums
346: Community Forums
347: Community Forums
348: Community Forums
349: Community Forums
350: Community Forums
351: Member Screenshots
352: Community Forums
353: Community Forums
354: Community Forums
355: Photo Gallery
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Member Screenshots
359: Photo Gallery
360: Community Forums
361: Member Screenshots
362: Community Forums
363: Community Forums
364: Member Screenshots
365: Community Forums
366: Community Forums
367: Member Screenshots
368: Statistics
369: Member Screenshots
370: Member Screenshots
371: Community Forums
372: News
373: Community Forums
374: Member Screenshots
375: Community Forums
376: Downloads
377: Home
378: Community Forums
379: Community Forums
380: Community Forums
381: Community Forums
382: Photo Gallery
383: Community Forums
384: Community Forums
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Member Screenshots
388: Community Forums
389: Community Forums
390: Community Forums
391: News Archive
392: Community Forums
393: Community Forums
394: Community Forums
395: Community Forums
396: Community Forums
397: Home
398: Community Forums
399: Community Forums
400: Community Forums
401: News
402: Community Forums
403: Community Forums
404: Member Screenshots
405: Community Forums
406: Community Forums
407: Community Forums
408: Community Forums
409: Community Forums
410: Community Forums
411: Community Forums
412: Community Forums
413: Member Screenshots
414: Community Forums
415: Community Forums
416: Community Forums
417: Community Forums
418: Photo Gallery
419: Community Forums
420: Community Forums
421: Community Forums
422: Home
423: Downloads
424: Downloads
425: Community Forums
426: Photo Gallery
427: Photo Gallery
428: Photo Gallery
429: Community Forums
430: Downloads
431: Community Forums
432: Community Forums
433: Community Forums
434: Community Forums
435: Community Forums
436: Community Forums
437: Community Forums
438: Community Forums
439: Downloads
440: Community Forums
441: Community Forums
442: Community Forums
443: Community Forums
444: Community Forums
445: Community Forums
446: Community Forums
447: Community Forums
448: Photo Gallery
449: Community Forums
450: Community Forums
451: Community Forums
452: News Archive
453: Community Forums
454: Photo Gallery
455: Community Forums
456: Downloads
457: Community Forums
458: Community Forums
459: Community Forums
460: Home
461: Community Forums
462: Community Forums
463: Community Forums
464: Community Forums
465: Community Forums
466: Community Forums
467: Community Forums
468: Community Forums
469: Community Forums
470: Community Forums
471: Photo Gallery
472: Community Forums
473: Community Forums
474: Community Forums
475: Community Forums
476: Community Forums
477: Community Forums
478: Community Forums
479: Photo Gallery
480: Community Forums
481: News Archive
482: Photo Gallery
483: Community Forums
484: Community Forums
485: Photo Gallery
486: Community Forums
487: Member Screenshots
488: Home
489: Community Forums
490: Community Forums
491: Community Forums
492: Member Screenshots
493: Community Forums
494: Community Forums
495: Community Forums
496: Community Forums
497: Member Screenshots
498: Member Screenshots
499: Photo Gallery
500: News
501: Community Forums
502: Community Forums
503: Community Forums
504: Community Forums
505: Community Forums
506: Community Forums
507: Tell a Friend
508: Community Forums
509: Photo Gallery
510: Photo Gallery
511: Photo Gallery
512: Photo Gallery
513: Community Forums
514: Member Screenshots
515: Community Forums
516: Community Forums
517: Community Forums
518: Photo Gallery
519: Downloads
520: Photo Gallery
521: Community Forums
522: Community Forums
523: Photo Gallery
524: Community Forums
525: Community Forums
526: Community Forums
527: Community Forums
528: Community Forums
529: Community Forums
530: Community Forums
531: Community Forums
532: Community Forums
533: Photo Gallery
534: Community Forums
535: Community Forums
536: Community Forums
537: Community Forums
538: Community Forums
539: Community Forums
540: Community Forums
541: Community Forums
542: Community Forums
543: Community Forums
544: Community Forums
545: Community Forums
546: Community Forums
547: Community Forums
548: Community Forums
549: Member Screenshots
550: Community Forums
551: Community Forums
552: Community Forums
553: Photo Gallery
554: Community Forums
555: Community Forums
556: Community Forums
557: Community Forums
558: Community Forums
559: Downloads
560: Community Forums
561: Community Forums
562: News Archive
563: Community Forums
564: Community Forums
565: Community Forums
566: Your Account
567: Community Forums
568: Community Forums
569: Community Forums
570: Photo Gallery
571: Statistics
572: Community Forums
573: Community Forums
574: Member Screenshots
575: Photo Gallery
576: Community Forums
577: Community Forums
578: Community Forums
579: Community Forums
580: Community Forums
581: Community Forums
582: Community Forums
583: Home
584: Photo Gallery
585: Community Forums
586: Photo Gallery
587: Downloads
588: Community Forums
589: Community Forums
590: Community Forums
591: Community Forums
592: Photo Gallery
593: Photo Gallery
594: News Archive
595: Community Forums
596: Community Forums
597: Member Screenshots
598: Community Forums
599: Member Screenshots
600: Community Forums
601: Member Screenshots
602: Member Screenshots
603: Member Screenshots
604: Community Forums
605: Photo Gallery
606: Community Forums
607: Community Forums
608: Downloads
609: Photo Gallery
610: Community Forums
611: Community Forums
612: Community Forums
613: Community Forums
614: News Archive
615: Photo Gallery
616: Member Screenshots
617: Community Forums
618: Community Forums
619: Community Forums
620: News Archive
621: Downloads
622: Member Screenshots
623: Photo Gallery
624: Community Forums
625: Member Screenshots
626: Community Forums
627: Home
628: Home
629: Community Forums
630: Member Screenshots
631: Community Forums
632: Community Forums
633: Downloads
634: Community Forums
635: Home
636: Member Screenshots
637: Member Screenshots
638: Member Screenshots
639: Photo Gallery
640: Community Forums
641: Photo Gallery
642: Community Forums
643: Member Screenshots
644: Community Forums
645: Member Screenshots
646: Community Forums
647: Member Screenshots
648: Community Forums
649: Community Forums
650: Home
651: Community Forums
652: News Archive
653: Community Forums
654: Member Screenshots
655: Community Forums
656: Photo Gallery
657: Community Forums
658: Statistics
659: Community Forums
660: Member Screenshots
661: Community Forums
662: Downloads
663: Home
664: Community Forums
665: Community Forums
666: Member Screenshots
667: Community Forums
668: Downloads
669: Downloads
670: Community Forums
671: Community Forums
672: Photo Gallery
673: Community Forums
674: Photo Gallery
675: Community Forums
676: Community Forums
677: Home
678: Member Screenshots
679: Community Forums
680: Community Forums
681: Community Forums
682: Community Forums
683: Community Forums
684: Photo Gallery
685: Community Forums
686: Community Forums
687: Community Forums
688: Downloads
689: Member Screenshots
690: Home
691: Photo Gallery
692: News Archive
693: Community Forums
694: Community Forums
695: Community Forums
696: Community Forums
697: Community Forums
698: Community Forums
699: Home
700: Community Forums
701: Photo Gallery
702: Member Screenshots
703: Photo Gallery
704: Community Forums
705: Community Forums
706: Photo Gallery
707: Community Forums
708: Home
709: Community Forums
710: Community Forums
711: Community Forums
712: Community Forums
713: Community Forums
714: Home
715: Photo Gallery
716: Photo Gallery
717: Community Forums
718: Community Forums
719: Statistics
720: Community Forums
721: Community Forums
722: Community Forums
723: Photo Gallery
724: Community Forums
725: Community Forums
726: Photo Gallery
727: Photo Gallery
728: Downloads
729: Member Screenshots
730: Community Forums
731: Home
732: Community Forums
733: Photo Gallery
734: Your Account
735: Community Forums
736: Community Forums
737: Community Forums
738: Community Forums
739: Home
740: Photo Gallery
741: Community Forums
742: News Archive
743: Member Screenshots
744: Member Screenshots
745: Community Forums
746: Community Forums
747: Photo Gallery
748: Community Forums
749: Community Forums
750: Community Forums
751: Community Forums
752: Your Account
753: Community Forums
754: Community Forums
755: Community Forums
756: Statistics
757: Home
758: Member Screenshots
759: Community Forums
760: Statistics
761: Community Forums
762: Photo Gallery
763: Community Forums
764: Member Screenshots
765: Your Account
766: Community Forums
767: Community Forums
768: Downloads
769: Community Forums
770: Community Forums
771: Community Forums
772: Community Forums
773: Community Forums
774: Community Forums
775: Community Forums
776: Community Forums
777: Community Forums
778: Community Forums
779: Community Forums
780: Downloads
781: Photo Gallery
782: Community Forums
783: News Archive
784: Community Forums
785: News
786: Community Forums
787: Community Forums
788: Photo Gallery
789: Community Forums
790: Community Forums
791: Community Forums
792: Community Forums
793: Community Forums
794: Photo Gallery
795: Your Account
796: Home
797: Community Forums
798: Community Forums
799: Your Account
800: Community Forums
801: Community Forums
802: Community Forums
803: Photo Gallery
804: Community Forums
805: Community Forums
806: Community Forums
807: Home
808: Community Forums
809: Community Forums
810: Downloads
811: Community Forums
812: Community Forums
813: Member Screenshots
814: Community Forums
815: Community Forums
816: Downloads
817: Community Forums
818: Home
819: Community Forums
820: Photo Gallery
821: Downloads
822: Community Forums
823: Community Forums
824: Community Forums
825: Community Forums
826: Community Forums
827: Photo Gallery
828: Community Forums
829: Photo Gallery
830: Community Forums
831: Home
832: Community Forums
833: Community Forums
834: Community Forums
835: Community Forums
836: Your Account
837: Community Forums
838: Community Forums
839: Community Forums
840: Community Forums
841: Community Forums
842: Community Forums
843: Community Forums
844: Community Forums
845: Photo Gallery
846: Community Forums
847: Home
848: Photo Gallery
849: Community Forums
850: Community Forums
851: Photo Gallery
852: Community Forums
853: Community Forums
854: Member Screenshots
855: Photo Gallery
856: Community Forums
857: Community Forums
858: Community Forums
859: Photo Gallery
860: Community Forums
861: Photo Gallery
862: Community Forums
863: Community Forums
864: Home
865: Member Screenshots
866: Member Screenshots
867: Community Forums
868: Community Forums
869: Community Forums
870: Member Screenshots
871: Community Forums
872: Community Forums
873: Community Forums
874: Home
875: Member Screenshots
876: Community Forums
877: Community Forums
878: Community Forums
879: Member Screenshots
880: Community Forums
881: Photo Gallery
882: Community Forums
883: Community Forums
884: Photo Gallery
885: Community Forums
886: Statistics
887: Community Forums
888: Community Forums
889: Community Forums
890: Home
891: Photo Gallery
892: Member Screenshots
893: Community Forums
894: Community Forums
895: Community Forums
896: Community Forums
897: Community Forums
898: Community Forums
899: Community Forums
900: Community Forums
901: Home
902: Community Forums
903: Photo Gallery
904: Treasury
905: Community Forums
906: Community Forums
907: Community Forums
908: Community Forums
909: Community Forums
910: Community Forums
911: Community Forums
912: Community Forums
913: Community Forums
914: Home
915: Downloads
916: Community Forums
917: Community Forums
918: Member Screenshots
919: Community Forums
920: Member Screenshots
921: Community Forums
922: Community Forums
923: Member Screenshots
924: Home
925: Photo Gallery
926: Community Forums
927: Community Forums
928: Community Forums
929: Home
930: Community Forums
931: Community Forums
932: Community Forums
933: Photo Gallery
934: Member Screenshots
935: Member Screenshots
936: Community Forums
937: News
938: Home
939: Member Screenshots
940: Downloads
941: Community Forums
942: Photo Gallery
943: Downloads
944: Community Forums
945: Community Forums
946: Member Screenshots
947: Community Forums
948: Photo Gallery
949: Community Forums
950: Home
951: Downloads
952: Community Forums
953: Community Forums
954: Community Forums
955: Photo Gallery
956: Home
957: Community Forums
958: Home
959: Community Forums
960: Member Screenshots
961: Downloads
962: Community Forums
963: Community Forums
964: Community Forums
965: Community Forums
966: Community Forums
967: Community Forums
968: Downloads
969: Downloads
970: Downloads
971: Community Forums
972: Community Forums
973: Photo Gallery
974: Community Forums
975: Community Forums
976: Community Forums
977: Photo Gallery
978: News Archive
979: Community Forums
980: Photo Gallery
981: Community Forums
982: Photo Gallery
983: Downloads
984: Statistics
985: Community Forums
986: Photo Gallery
987: Photo Gallery
988: Photo Gallery
989: Photo Gallery
990: Home
991: Community Forums
992: Community Forums
993: Photo Gallery
994: Member Screenshots
995: Community Forums
996: Community Forums
997: Community Forums
998: Community Forums
999: Community Forums
1000: Community Forums
1001: Community Forums
1002: Photo Gallery
1003: Community Forums
1004: Community Forums
1005: Community Forums
1006: Downloads
1007: Downloads
1008: Photo Gallery
1009: Community Forums
1010: Community Forums
1011: Community Forums
1012: Member Screenshots
1013: Community Forums
1014: Downloads
1015: Photo Gallery
1016: Downloads
1017: Community Forums
1018: Community Forums
1019: Community Forums
1020: News Archive
1021: Photo Gallery
1022: Community Forums
1023: Community Forums
1024: Community Forums
1025: Member Screenshots
1026: Community Forums
1027: Member Screenshots
1028: Community Forums
1029: Photo Gallery
1030: Community Forums
1031: Community Forums
1032: Community Forums
1033: Community Forums
1034: Photo Gallery
1035: Community Forums
1036: Community Forums
1037: Supporters
1038: Photo Gallery
1039: Community Forums
1040: Community Forums
1041: Community Forums
1042: Community Forums
1043: Community Forums
1044: Community Forums
1045: Community Forums
1046: Photo Gallery
1047: Home
1048: Community Forums
1049: Contact
1050: Home
1051: Community Forums
1052: Photo Gallery
1053: Community Forums
1054: News Archive
1055: Community Forums
1056: Member Screenshots
1057: Community Forums
1058: Community Forums
1059: Home
1060: Member Screenshots
1061: Member Screenshots
1062: Downloads
1063: Community Forums
1064: Community Forums
1065: Community Forums
1066: Member Screenshots
1067: Community Forums
1068: Member Screenshots
1069: Community Forums
1070: Home
1071: Member Screenshots
1072: Photo Gallery
1073: Community Forums
1074: Community Forums
1075: Community Forums
1076: Photo Gallery
1077: Community Forums
1078: Community Forums
1079: Community Forums
1080: Community Forums
1081: Member Screenshots
1082: Statistics
1083: Photo Gallery
1084: Community Forums
1085: Member Screenshots
1086: Community Forums
1087: Community Forums
1088: Photo Gallery
1089: Home
1090: Community Forums
1091: Community Forums
1092: Community Forums
1093: Community Forums
1094: Statistics
1095: Community Forums
1096: Community Forums
1097: Home
1098: Community Forums
1099: Community Forums
1100: Community Forums
1101: Community Forums
1102: Community Forums
1103: Community Forums
1104: Community Forums
1105: Photo Gallery
1106: News Archive
1107: Community Forums
1108: Community Forums
1109: Community Forums
1110: Community Forums
1111: Community Forums
1112: Community Forums
1113: Community Forums
1114: Community Forums
1115: Community Forums
1116: Community Forums
1117: Statistics
1118: Community Forums
1119: Community Forums
1120: Photo Gallery
1121: Community Forums
1122: Community Forums
1123: Downloads
1124: Home
1125: Photo Gallery
1126: Community Forums
1127: Photo Gallery
1128: Photo Gallery
1129: Community Forums
1130: Community Forums
1131: Community Forums
1132: Community Forums
1133: Community Forums
1134: Community Forums
1135: Community Forums
1136: Community Forums
1137: Downloads
1138: News
1139: Community Forums
1140: Community Forums
1141: Community Forums
1142: Community Forums
1143: Statistics
1144: Community Forums
1145: Community Forums
1146: Photo Gallery
1147: Community Forums
1148: Member Screenshots
1149: Community Forums
1150: Community Forums
1151: Community Forums
1152: Member Screenshots
1153: Community Forums
1154: Community Forums
1155: Downloads
1156: Community Forums
1157: News Archive
1158: Member Screenshots
1159: Photo Gallery
1160: Community Forums
1161: Community Forums
1162: Community Forums
1163: Community Forums
1164: Community Forums
1165: Photo Gallery
1166: Community Forums
1167: News Archive
1168: Community Forums
1169: Community Forums
1170: Community Forums
1171: Community Forums
1172: Community Forums
1173: Community Forums
1174: Member Screenshots
1175: Community Forums
1176: Member Screenshots
1177: Community Forums
1178: Community Forums
1179: Community Forums
1180: Community Forums
1181: Photo Gallery
1182: Community Forums
1183: Community Forums
1184: Community Forums
1185: Community Forums
1186: Community Forums
1187: Community Forums
1188: Photo Gallery
1189: Downloads
1190: Downloads
1191: Community Forums
1192: Community Forums
1193: Home
1194: Community Forums
1195: Community Forums
1196: Community Forums
1197: Community Forums
1198: Community Forums
1199: Community Forums
1200: Community Forums
1201: Community Forums
1202: Community Forums
1203: Community Forums
1204: News Archive
1205: Community Forums
1206: Community Forums
1207: News Archive
1208: Community Forums
1209: Community Forums
1210: Home
1211: Community Forums
1212: Community Forums
1213: Community Forums
1214: Community Forums
1215: Community Forums
1216: Community Forums
1217: Downloads
1218: Community Forums
1219: Community Forums
1220: News Archive
1221: Community Forums
1222: Community Forums
1223: Community Forums
1224: Community Forums
1225: Community Forums
1226: Community Forums
1227: Home
1228: Community Forums
1229: Community Forums
1230: Community Forums
1231: Home
1232: Community Forums
1233: Community Forums
1234: Community Forums
1235: Member Screenshots
1236: Community Forums
1237: Community Forums
1238: Community Forums
1239: Community Forums
1240: Photo Gallery
1241: Member Screenshots
1242: Community Forums
1243: Community Forums
1244: Community Forums
1245: Community Forums
1246: Community Forums
1247: Community Forums
1248: Member Screenshots
1249: Community Forums
1250: Community Forums
1251: Community Forums
1252: Community Forums
1253: Community Forums
1254: Community Forums
1255: Home
1256: Community Forums
1257: Photo Gallery
1258: Photo Gallery
1259: Photo Gallery
1260: Community Forums
1261: Member Screenshots
1262: Community Forums
1263: Community Forums
1264: Community Forums
1265: Home
1266: Home
1267: Member Screenshots
1268: Community Forums
1269: Community Forums
1270: Community Forums
1271: Community Forums
1272: Community Forums
1273: Member Screenshots
1274: Community Forums
1275: Home
1276: Community Forums
1277: Community Forums
1278: Photo Gallery
1279: Community Forums
1280: Photo Gallery
1281: Community Forums
1282: News Archive
1283: Community Forums
1284: Downloads
1285: Home
1286: Member Screenshots
1287: Community Forums
1288: Community Forums
1289: Community Forums
1290: Community Forums
1291: Photo Gallery
1292: Community Forums
1293: Photo Gallery
1294: Community Forums
1295: Community Forums
1296: Photo Gallery
1297: Community Forums
1298: Community Forums
1299: Downloads
1300: Home
1301: Photo Gallery
1302: Downloads
1303: Community Forums
1304: Community Forums
1305: Community Forums
1306: News Archive
1307: Community Forums
1308: Community Forums
1309: Community Forums
1310: Community Forums
1311: Community Forums
1312: Photo Gallery
1313: Member Screenshots
1314: Photo Gallery
1315: Home
1316: Downloads
1317: Community Forums
1318: News
1319: Community Forums
1320: Community Forums
1321: Photo Gallery
1322: Community Forums
1323: Community Forums
1324: Community Forums
1325: Community Forums
1326: Community Forums
1327: Community Forums
1328: Community Forums
1329: Community Forums
1330: Community Forums
1331: News Archive
1332: Community Forums
1333: Photo Gallery
1334: News Archive
1335: Community Forums
1336: Photo Gallery
1337: Community Forums
1338: Member Screenshots
1339: Community Forums
1340: Community Forums
1341: Community Forums
1342: Community Forums
1343: Community Forums
1344: Photo Gallery
1345: Downloads
1346: Member Screenshots
1347: Community Forums
1348: Community Forums
1349: Community Forums
1350: Home
1351: Community Forums
1352: News Archive
1353: Community Forums
1354: Community Forums
1355: Photo Gallery
1356: Community Forums
1357: Downloads
1358: Community Forums
1359: Community Forums
1360: Community Forums
1361: Home
1362: Community Forums
1363: Community Forums
1364: Community Forums
1365: Community Forums
1366: Community Forums
1367: Community Forums
1368: Community Forums
1369: Home
1370: Community Forums
1371: Community Forums
1372: Community Forums
1373: Community Forums
1374: Community Forums
1375: Community Forums
1376: Community Forums
1377: Community Forums
1378: Photo Gallery
1379: Community Forums
1380: Photo Gallery
1381: Photo Gallery
1382: Community Forums
1383: Photo Gallery
1384: Community Forums
1385: Home
1386: Community Forums
1387: Community Forums
1388: Photo Gallery
1389: Community Forums
1390: Community Forums
1391: Community Forums
1392: Community Forums
1393: Member Screenshots
1394: Home
1395: Community Forums
1396: Community Forums
1397: Community Forums
1398: Community Forums
1399: Photo Gallery
1400: Photo Gallery
1401: Community Forums
1402: Community Forums
1403: Community Forums
1404: Photo Gallery
1405: Member Screenshots
1406: Photo Gallery
1407: Community Forums
1408: Community Forums
1409: Photo Gallery
1410: Community Forums
1411: News
1412: Community Forums
1413: Community Forums
1414: Community Forums
1415: Your Account
1416: Community Forums
1417: Member Screenshots
1418: News Archive
1419: Photo Gallery
1420: Community Forums
1421: Community Forums
1422: Community Forums
1423: Member Screenshots
1424: Community Forums
1425: Community Forums
1426: Community Forums
1427: Community Forums
1428: Community Forums
1429: News
1430: Community Forums
1431: Community Forums
1432: Photo Gallery
1433: Community Forums
1434: Community Forums
1435: Community Forums
1436: Community Forums
1437: Community Forums
1438: Community Forums
1439: Community Forums
1440: Community Forums
1441: Home
1442: Home
1443: Photo Gallery
1444: Community Forums
1445: Home
1446: Community Forums
1447: Community Forums
1448: Home
1449: Community Forums
1450: Community Forums
1451: Community Forums
1452: Community Forums
1453: Community Forums
1454: Community Forums
1455: Statistics
1456: Community Forums
1457: Community Forums
1458: Community Forums
1459: Community Forums
1460: Photo Gallery
1461: Member Screenshots
1462: Community Forums
1463: Community Forums
1464: Community Forums
1465: Photo Gallery
1466: Photo Gallery
1467: Community Forums
1468: Community Forums
1469: Downloads
1470: Photo Gallery
1471: Community Forums
1472: Community Forums
1473: Community Forums
1474: Photo Gallery
1475: Community Forums
1476: Community Forums
1477: Community Forums
1478: Photo Gallery
1479: Community Forums
1480: Community Forums
1481: Home
1482: Member Screenshots
1483: Member Screenshots
1484: Community Forums
1485: Community Forums
1486: Photo Gallery
1487: Member Screenshots
1488: Community Forums
1489: Community Forums
1490: Photo Gallery
1491: Community Forums
1492: Community Forums
1493: Community Forums
1494: Community Forums
1495: News Archive
1496: Community Forums
1497: Photo Gallery
1498: Community Forums
1499: Community Forums
1500: Community Forums
1501: Community Forums
1502: Community Forums
1503: Community Forums
1504: Community Forums
1505: Member Screenshots
1506: Community Forums
1507: Community Forums
1508: Member Screenshots
1509: Community Forums
1510: Community Forums
1511: Photo Gallery
1512: Community Forums
1513: Community Forums
1514: Community Forums
1515: Community Forums
1516: Community Forums
1517: Home
1518: Community Forums
1519: Community Forums
1520: Community Forums
1521: Community Forums
1522: Community Forums
1523: Community Forums
1524: Community Forums
1525: Community Forums
1526: Community Forums
1527: Community Forums
1528: Community Forums
1529: Community Forums
1530: Community Forums
1531: Community Forums
1532: Community Forums
1533: Community Forums
1534: Community Forums
1535: Community Forums
1536: Community Forums
1537: Photo Gallery
1538: Community Forums
1539: Downloads
1540: News Archive
1541: Home
1542: Community Forums
1543: Community Forums
1544: Photo Gallery
1545: Member Screenshots
1546: Community Forums
1547: Community Forums
1548: Photo Gallery
1549: Photo Gallery
1550: Member Screenshots
1551: Community Forums
1552: Community Forums
1553: Home
1554: Community Forums
1555: Community Forums
1556: Community Forums
1557: Community Forums
1558: Community Forums
1559: Community Forums
1560: Community Forums
1561: Community Forums
1562: Member Screenshots
1563: Community Forums
1564: Community Forums
1565: Member Screenshots
1566: Member Screenshots
1567: Photo Gallery
1568: Community Forums
1569: Community Forums
1570: Community Forums
1571: Community Forums
1572: Community Forums
1573: Community Forums
1574: Community Forums
1575: Community Forums
1576: Community Forums
1577: Member Screenshots
1578: News Archive
1579: Member Screenshots
1580: Member Screenshots
1581: Member Screenshots
1582: Member Screenshots
1583: Photo Gallery
1584: News Archive
1585: Community Forums
1586: Community Forums
1587: Community Forums
1588: Community Forums
1589: Photo Gallery
1590: Photo Gallery
1591: Home
1592: Home
1593: Community Forums
1594: Community Forums
1595: Community Forums
1596: Community Forums
1597: Community Forums
1598: Community Forums
1599: Member Screenshots
1600: Community Forums
1601: Community Forums
1602: Community Forums
1603: Community Forums
1604: Community Forums
1605: Community Forums
1606: Photo Gallery
1607: Community Forums
1608: Community Forums
1609: Community Forums
1610: Home
1611: Member Screenshots
1612: Photo Gallery
1613: Community Forums
1614: Community Forums
1615: Community Forums
1616: Downloads
1617: Community Forums
1618: Community Forums
1619: Community Forums
1620: Member Screenshots
1621: Photo Gallery
1622: Photo Gallery
1623: Community Forums
1624: Downloads
1625: Community Forums
1626: Community Forums
1627: Community Forums
1628: Community Forums
1629: Member Screenshots
1630: Home
1631: Community Forums
1632: Community Forums
1633: Community Forums
1634: Community Forums
1635: Community Forums
1636: Community Forums
1637: Community Forums
1638: Member Screenshots
1639: Community Forums
1640: Community Forums
1641: Community Forums
1642: Community Forums
1643: Community Forums
1644: Community Forums
1645: Community Forums
1646: Member Screenshots
1647: Home
1648: Community Forums
1649: Community Forums
1650: Community Forums
1651: Community Forums
1652: Community Forums
1653: Community Forums
1654: Community Forums
1655: Photo Gallery
1656: Community Forums
1657: Community Forums
1658: Community Forums
1659: Community Forums
1660: Member Screenshots
1661: Community Forums
1662: Home
1663: Downloads
1664: Community Forums
1665: Community Forums
1666: Community Forums
1667: Home
1668: Community Forums
1669: Community Forums
1670: Photo Gallery
1671: Community Forums
1672: Community Forums
1673: Community Forums
1674: Community Forums
1675: Community Forums
1676: Community Forums
1677: Community Forums
1678: Community Forums
1679: Home
1680: Photo Gallery
1681: Community Forums
1682: News Archive
1683: Community Forums
1684: Community Forums
1685: Home
1686: Community Forums
1687: Community Forums
1688: Community Forums
1689: Downloads
1690: Home
1691: Community Forums
1692: Community Forums
1693: Your Account
1694: Community Forums
1695: Community Forums
1696: Community Forums
1697: Community Forums
1698: Community Forums
1699: Community Forums
1700: Community Forums
1701: Photo Gallery
1702: Community Forums
1703: Community Forums
1704: Community Forums
1705: Community Forums
1706: Downloads
1707: Member Screenshots
1708: Member Screenshots
1709: Home
1710: Home
1711: Community Forums
1712: Member Screenshots
1713: Community Forums
1714: Community Forums
1715: Community Forums
1716: Community Forums
1717: Community Forums
1718: Community Forums
1719: Community Forums
1720: Photo Gallery
1721: Community Forums
1722: Community Forums
1723: Community Forums
1724: Home
1725: Community Forums
1726: Community Forums
1727: Statistics
1728: Photo Gallery
1729: Community Forums
1730: News Archive
1731: Community Forums
1732: Home
1733: Photo Gallery
1734: Photo Gallery
1735: Member Screenshots
1736: Community Forums
1737: Community Forums
1738: Community Forums
1739: Community Forums
1740: Home
1741: Community Forums
1742: Community Forums
1743: Member Screenshots
1744: Community Forums
1745: Downloads
1746: Community Forums
1747: Community Forums
1748: Community Forums
1749: Community Forums
1750: Community Forums
1751: Photo Gallery
1752: Community Forums
1753: Community Forums
1754: Home
1755: Downloads
1756: Statistics
1757: Community Forums
1758: Home
1759: News
1760: Photo Gallery
1761: Photo Gallery
1762: Community Forums
1763: Downloads
1764: Community Forums
1765: Downloads
1766: Community Forums
1767: Photo Gallery
1768: Community Forums
1769: Community Forums
1770: Community Forums
1771: Community Forums
1772: Community Forums
1773: Community Forums
1774: Home
1775: Photo Gallery
1776: Community Forums
1777: Member Screenshots
1778: Community Forums
1779: Home
1780: Community Forums
1781: Photo Gallery
1782: Photo Gallery
1783: Community Forums
1784: Community Forums
1785: Community Forums
1786: Community Forums
1787: Community Forums
1788: Community Forums
1789: Member Screenshots
1790: Community Forums
1791: Community Forums
1792: Home
1793: Community Forums
1794: Community Forums
1795: Community Forums
1796: Photo Gallery
1797: Member Screenshots
1798: Community Forums
1799: Community Forums
1800: Photo Gallery
1801: Community Forums
1802: Community Forums
1803: Community Forums
1804: News Archive
1805: Community Forums
1806: Community Forums
1807: Community Forums
1808: Community Forums
1809: Community Forums
1810: Community Forums
1811: Home
1812: News Archive
1813: Member Screenshots
1814: Community Forums
1815: Your Account
1816: Community Forums
1817: Community Forums
1818: Community Forums
1819: Community Forums
1820: Community Forums
1821: Home
1822: Community Forums
1823: Community Forums
1824: News
1825: Community Forums
1826: Downloads
1827: Photo Gallery
1828: Photo Gallery
1829: Downloads
1830: Community Forums
1831: Community Forums
1832: Photo Gallery
1833: Downloads
1834: Community Forums
1835: Photo Gallery
1836: Photo Gallery
1837: Home
1838: Community Forums
1839: Community Forums
1840: Community Forums
1841: Home
1842: Community Forums
1843: Community Forums
1844: Photo Gallery
1845: Community Forums
1846: Home
1847: Home
1848: Community Forums
1849: Community Forums
1850: Community Forums
1851: Your Account
1852: Photo Gallery
1853: Community Forums
1854: Community Forums
1855: Community Forums
1856: Home
1857: Community Forums
1858: Community Forums
1859: Member Screenshots
1860: Photo Gallery
1861: Member Screenshots
1862: Community Forums
1863: Statistics
1864: Community Forums
1865: Community Forums
1866: Photo Gallery
1867: Community Forums
1868: Community Forums
1869: Community Forums
1870: Community Forums
1871: Community Forums
1872: Downloads
1873: Community Forums
1874: Downloads
1875: Community Forums
1876: Community Forums
1877: Community Forums
1878: Photo Gallery
1879: Your Account
1880: Photo Gallery
1881: Community Forums
1882: Community Forums
1883: Community Forums
1884: News Archive
1885: Home
1886: Photo Gallery
1887: Statistics
1888: Photo Gallery
1889: Photo Gallery
1890: Photo Gallery
1891: Community Forums
1892: Photo Gallery
1893: Community Forums
1894: Community Forums
1895: Community Forums
1896: Community Forums
1897: Community Forums
1898: Community Forums
1899: Downloads
1900: Community Forums
1901: Member Screenshots
1902: Photo Gallery
1903: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted Facts
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 7:12 am
Post subject: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted Facts

Hey Folks!

I was thinking that sense this subject comes up from time to time, maybe it would be a good idea to start a thread on just the Sherman tank.

What I did was copy all the posts, along with Jeff's great M4A3 HVSS 76mm photo, about the Sherman that were posted in the 4th ID Museum thread. Hope this is OK with everyone.

Hey Doug! Could you make this one a 'sticky' so it will stay at the top of the forum? Also if this is not OK, is there a better way to do this?

Photo by Jeff Button 4th Infantry Division Musuem Ft. Hood Texas July 2006


HF_Evolution Joined: Dec 22, 2005 Posts: 1
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 1:23 pm Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nice picture of the Sherman, the British much to the disgust of the yanks stuch a 17pounder cann on in many of there Shermans, thinking the american gun was not good enough, they called this tank a Firefly. The Germans knicknamed them "Tommy Cookers", as when they were hit the brewed up (burst into flames, and the crews were usualy cooked. They were not at all as good as the german Arour, no way near, but there advantage was numbers. As one german tank commander said" As they came over the hill we destoyed them, all day, by the night the burning wrecks were all over the place and we congradulated our selves, next morning they came swarming over the hill again, we could not stop them and had to with draw."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

C_Sherman Joined: Jan 24, 2006 Posts: 151
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:01 pm Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...
Quote:
Doug_Kibbey wrote:
Be gentle with him, Guys....
End of Quote

Where to start, where to start? There is so much wrong with that post that I wonder if it is intentionally intended to create a controversy. New guy, one post, and he starts with that...

I'll leave it to the others to set him straight. We've done this too many times now!

C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doug_Kibbey Joined: Jan 23, 2006 Posts: 1055
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:14 am Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...

Well, I mention only in passing that there was a broadcast over the weekend on Discovery or Military Channel that used much of the same language all in the space of an hour. My impression is that someone young and new to these discussions has just seen it and is parroting some of the things he garnered from those shows.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bsmart Joined: Jan 23, 2006 Posts: 408
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 1:41 am Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Okay - I'm home now so lets lay out the defense of the Sherman

the 17pdr was a very good antitank gun, but it had poor HE performance. The 75mm had excellent HE performance but by 1944 mediocre armor piercing capability. The 75mm was being replaced by the 76mm gun (That is what the pictured tank is equipped with) The 76mm had moderate AP capability combined with good HE capability. Since most Shermans in American units spent their time dealing with antitank guns, buildings, machine gun emplacements, etc. HE performance was very important. The Sherman had one big advantage over the German tanks. It's powered turret was excellent. The Sherman used a hydraulic power system that was fast and smooth. The power drive for the panther ran off a power takeoff from the drivetrain. If the engine had a heavy load and the power traverse was used it could stall the engine. Consequently many units had policies that the power traverse was not to be used. I've seen some reports that it was sometimes diconnected completly. I've seen reports where Panthers and Shermans had meeting engagements where the Sherman was able to slew the turret around and get killing shots off before the Panther could swing it's gun around. There are also cases where in narrow streets the Pnather could not swing it's gun around due to hitting buildings or trees

'Tommy Cooker' or 'Ronson' - Yes early Shermans tended to burn when hit by German AP rounds. This was not due to the gasoline fuel. The ammo stowage in early Shermans was high and in the side sponsons. This combined with a very effective HE filler used by the Germans in their AP rounds led to a large number of secondary explosions. An interim solution was applique armor that was applied to Shermans to put heavier protection over these areas (and a few others that were found). The British did not use an explosive filler in their AP rounds. They used either solid shot or American AP that had the explosive filler removed (I assume they were delivered with the cavity empty and that they did notactually remove the explosive charge that the Americans designed the rounds for). So even if a British tank penetrated a German tank all it did was punch a hole in the tank. There would be some secondary damage (There are very few places inside a tank you wouldn't hit some other equipment) but nothing like the explosive charge in the German round would cause.

'The German Tanks were better armored than the Sherman' - Yes. The Panther was about 45 tons compared to the Shermans 35 tons. Ten tons of weight is a lot of armor. The U.S. had to design the Sherman to be shipped half way around the world to be used. The Germans had to send a Panther 500-1000 miles from the factory, generally via rail or road shipment. The Americans had to plan un unloading Shermans in ports where the heavy lifting equipment was out of commision or across beaches where ther was no heavy cargo handling equipment at all. So they had to be able to unload using ships cargo gear. This limited the size of the vehicle.

The German tanks may have been better armored but the Sherman was much more reliable. The U.S. demanded much higher reliability from it's vehicles than other armies did. I believe this was due to two factors. Again the U.S. knew it would be operating at the end of a very long supply line. They would not be able to send tanks back to stateside depots for major maintenance. The Germans assumed that the tank would be returned to the factory for major overhauls. Also the American automotive industry was probably the most advanced in the world at the time they could mass produce heavy equipment to good tolerances better than anyone else in the world.

When the Sherman entered production there was supposed to be a heavy tank to compliment the Sherman. In 1941-42 the Sherman was as good as any other medium tank in the world. The M-6 Heavy tank was being tested but was given a lower priority than the Sherman and the Stuart.

The M-6 had problems with the transmission (it was probably at least as reliable as any other countries heavy tank but did not meat American reliability standards) and given the extreme shipping constraints of the 1942-early 44 period when they were attempting to build up an army in the U.K. in the face of the Uboat campaign it was decided to not give the very heavy M-6 (50-60 tons) a high priority.

When a heavy tank did become available logistics again reared its demanding head. The Pershing was wider than the Sherman. This meant that every Bailey Bridge would have to be modified or risk being damaged by the wider tracks of the Pershing. So they were held back until after most of the major rivers were crossed (and the port of Antwerp with it's heavy cargo gear was operational)

There was a very good article titled "Tank Myths" comparing the Sherman to it's chief rival for fame (not The Panther, the T-34) in the September/October 2001 issue of Armor by Charles M. Bailey the author of "Faint Praise" a book I have been looking for for a long time since it is considered to be one of the definitive books on US WWII tank development

I think only one other tank in WWII could even compare to the Sherman. The T-34 and the Sherman both started life at about the same time and continued to be built and improved throughout the war. The M4A3E8 was a far different tank from the M4A1 'Michael' that was originally delivered to the British in early '42
_________________
Bob Smart
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neil_Baumgardner Joined: Jan 24, 2006 Posts: 507
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:13 am Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob, I'll play devil's advocate for the sake of discussion...

bsmart wrote:

'The German Tanks were better armored than the Sherman' - Yes. The Panther was about 45 tons compared to the Shermans 35 tons. Ten tons of weight is a lot of armor. The U.S. had to design the Sherman to be shipped half way around the world to be used. The Germans had to send a Panther 500-1000 miles from the factory, generally via rail or road shipment. The Americans had to plan un unloading Shermans in ports where the heavy lifting equipment was out of commision or across beaches where ther was no heavy cargo handling equipment at all. So they had to be able to unload using ships cargo gear. This limited the size of the vehicle.

Neil wrote:
Hindsight being 20-20 and primary role of the Sherman as infantry support granted, but if the traditional wisdom holds true that it took 3-4 Shermans to take out 1 Panther or Tiger - doesnt that mean the US ended up shipping 105-140 tons per kill? Seems like a smaller number of heavy tanks, even in the Panther weight class, would have been more efficient - shipping-wise - than all those Shermans... In fact, it would seem like there was a lot of wasted tonnage shipped...

Even if you grant that the primary role of the Sherman was infantry support, seems like a high-low mix might have been appropriate. The heavier Panther-class tanks could have been offloaded using LSTs no? Even M6s and T23s, with heavier armor than the Sherman, might have been a good stop-gap measure until the Pershing arrived...

bsmart wrote:
The M-6 had problems with the transmission (it was probably at least as reliable as any other countries heavy tank but did not meat American reliability standards) and given the extreme shipping constraints of the 1942-early 44 period when they were attempting to build up an army in the U.K. in the face of the Uboat campaign it was decided to not give the very heavy M-6 (50-60 tons) a high priority.

Neil wrote:
Again, hindsight 20-20, seems like M6s or T23s would have been a better use of shipping constraints than some of those Shermans...

bsmart wrote:
When a heavy tank did become available logistics again reared its demanding head. The Pershing was wider than the Sherman. This meant that every Bailey Bridge would have to be modified or risk being damaged by the wider tracks of the Pershing. So they were held back until after most of the major rivers were crossed (and the port of Antwerp with it's heavy cargo gear was operational)

Neil wrote:
How come this was only a concern for the Americans? Sure, there are lots of stories of Tigers, etc not being able to cross bridges, but it doesnt seem like this was a big concern for the Germany army... Point being, if the Germans can get around the same rivers & bridges (admittedly in retreat), seems like Pershings could have done the same...

bsmart wrote:
The M4A3E8 was a far different tank from the M4A1 'Michael' that was originally delivered to the British in early '42

Neil wrote:
Granted, but it has to seem that the Armor folks were a little too obsessive over the "tank" being an infantry support weapon. Even a mix of US Sherman Fireflies - not taking up more more weight at all, but with some additional ammo supply headaches - would have been a good decision. What would have been the impact of US mass-produced Fireflies been on the battlefield in 1944?

Neil
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bsmart Joined: Jan 23, 2006 Posts: 408
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:57 am Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm having trouble with the multiple level quotes so

Did we actually need more shipping because it took multiple Shermans to handel a 'Cat' That assumes that if you had brought over a limited number of 'anti-Cat' tanks you would be able to have one where you needed it when you needed it. Isn't that similar to the Tank destroyer doctrine of having some unist who were supposed to hunt enemy tanks? Problem is you can't know where they would show up so everyone has to be ready to handle the enemy tanks.

Why was the logistics only a US problem (actually an allied problem) Well The defender has some options on when to drop bridges (unless the zoomies get them first ) And there were times when German tanks were trapped because bridges had been destroyed. And one of the factors that slowed down the German ardennes spearheads in December of 44 were the tenacious defense of bridges by American Engineer units.

I don't think the U.S. obscessed on 'infantry support' If anything I think they obcessed on 'Tanks shouldn't fight tanks' and the use of tanks as a breakthrough weapon to run rampant in the enemies backfield once a hole had been made in the line. In that role the reliable Sherman excelled.

The big problem would have been building enough 17pdrs. It would have taken too long to 'americanize' it to be built in American factories (The British weapons that were adapted for U.S. production had been decided on early in the war when they had the 12 months or so needed to ramp up production lines. I've always thought there should have been a 90mm Sherman. The M36 showed it would fit. It was already in U.S. production. so could have been incorporated much faster than a new British gun.

There was an offer by Ordnance to supply 100+ M6s (with 105mm guns, not howitzers but long guns) to Europe but the command didn't want the logistics issues.
_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Roy_A_Lingle Joined: Jan 24, 2006 Posts: 515
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:00 am Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Folks!

Good posts Bob! Good counter post Neil!

A number of other factors that also impacted the Sherman, but then there is so much to the Sheman story, are:

the effect of General McNair on just about everything,
the mistaken belief that the 76mm and it's round could deal with Panther and Tiger tanks prior to June 6, 1944,
the mistaken doctrine that the tank destroyers could take care of all German armor,
the fact that combat engineer bridge units didn't have a pontoon bridge system in the ETO, until late 1944, that could safely support a vehicle as heavy as the Sherman on German rivers,

I am starting to get the feeling that we all need to get together and write a book about all the points and couter points of the Sherman. That way we can just link new guys like 'HF Evolution' over to it.

Surprised Idea

Bottom, line, it and the T34 won the war and that is the only thing that counts in the end. To 'HF Evolution' that comes from a CIA that once though much like your post.

Sgt, Scouts Out! Smile

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:48 am
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted Facts

- Roy_A_Lingle
Hey Folks!


I am starting to get the feeling that we all need to get together and write a book about all the points and couter points of the Sherman. That way we can just link new guys like 'HF Evolution' over to it.

Surprised Idea


Sgt, Scouts Out! Smile


Funny thing about this group, the same idea seems to come to several of us at almost the same time.

I started working on a 'In Defense of the Sherman' document/article last night at home. I ended up putting some of the information in the post but still have the beginnings of the document at home in Word. I decided that if I create such a document I need to be able to document things better than 'I read somewhere' or 'as I remember being told'. Not that it will be a scholarly work but without documentation it just becomes 'he said, she said'. So I am starting to recheck some of my sources, and possibly find sources for 'facts' that I have always assumed are documented somewhere.

I know I'm not the only one who has defended the Sherman here in the past, and I sure don't consider myself an expert, so as it develops I'll be looking for input from other folks.

Also after PM'ing Doug I'm going to try and attach the 'Tank Myths' article I mentioned in my previous post.

The system doesn't seem to allow PDF files as attachments. I'll see if I can convert it to something else but I thought PDF was pretty much a standard.

Second attempt - Below is a link to the article out at the Armor Magazine Web Site.

www.knox.army.mil/armo...yths01.pdf

When you connect up to their 'Back issue' page a comment pops up about needing a username and passowrd to access articles from 2001 and forward. I don't have any such thing so I'm not sure what they mean but if anyone has problems getting to the article I'd like to know.

Disclaimer - I am not responsible for the hours you will lose as you explore other interesting articles that you stumble across out there. That was always my problem when researching papers at school. When I found an article in the stacks that applied to my paper I found 3 others that didn't directly apply but were too interesting to ignore and I'd get sidetracked for hours.

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:20 am
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F

Hi Bob! Hi Folks!

Excellent! That was what I was thinking. Find the facts and pull them together here in one place. I have in mine a couple of photos that I think will help.

No problem with linking to the Myths article.
Sgt, Scouts Out! Smile

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:13 am
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted Facts

[quote="Roy_A_Lingle"]Hey Folks!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bsmart Joined: Jan 23, 2006 Posts: 408
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:57 am Post subject: Re: 1st Cav Museum at Ft Hood...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm having trouble with the multiple level quotes so

Did we actually need more shipping because it took multiple Shermans to handel a 'Cat' That assumes that if you had brought over a limited number of 'anti-Cat' tanks you would be able to have one where you needed it when you needed it. Isn't that similar to the Tank destroyer doctrine of having some unist who were supposed to hunt enemy tanks? Problem is you can't know where they would show up so everyone has to be ready to handle the enemy tanks.


However the British doctrine of mixing a Firefly in every tank platoon seems to have worked fairly well. While you might not have wanted to put an M6 or T23 in every Sherman platoon, you could have put a heavy tank platoon in every company for example. That would have ensured a good distribution on the battlefield.

IMO, the problems with Tank Destroyer doctrine were: 1) tank destroyers couldnt stand up in fights due to lighter armor; 2) tank destroyers were held at divisional level, which ensured they were almost never where they were needed...


Why was the logistics only a US problem (actually an allied problem) Well The defender has some options on when to drop bridges (unless the zoomies get them first ) And there were times when German tanks were trapped because bridges had been destroyed. And one of the factors that slowed down the German ardennes spearheads in December of 44 were the tenacious defense of bridges by American Engineer units.


Granted, but let me turn this a little way. Did the Germans only blow up bridges on the Western front? While the Rhein is much bigger, there are certainly lots of rivers to cross in Poland. How come the Soviets dont seem to have had much a problem getting their KV-1s & JS-2s across those rivers? Basically, I have a hard time believing that the US industrial juggernaught could not have solved this bridging problem if there had been some advance planning for the introduction of US heavy tanks.


I don't think the U.S. obscessed on 'infantry support' If anything I think they obcessed on 'Tanks shouldn't fight tanks' and the use of tanks as a breakthrough weapon to run rampant in the enemies backfield once a hole had been made in the line. In that role the reliable Sherman excelled.

The big problem would have been building enough 17pdrs. It would have taken too long to 'americanize' it to be built in American factories (The British weapons that were adapted for U.S. production had been decided on early in the war when they had the 12 months or so needed to ramp up production lines. I've always thought there should have been a 90mm Sherman. The M36 showed it would fit. It was already in U.S. production. so could have been incorporated much faster than a new British gun.


I'll admit this is the crux of the problem - Hindsight 20-20 of how dangerous Panthers & Tigers would be in 44. There's very little time from June 44 to May 45 to turn around any production decisions. So basically any changes would have had to have been decided upon before Normandy.

They would have had to come up with a new armored turret for that 90mm gun, but that does seem like a minor problem. It seems like there were several different options available to the US at the time - M6s, T23s, and upgraded Shermans - but none were taken into service unfortunately.

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:58 am
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted Facts

Woah!!! debating the pros and cons of the sherman here again...
i guess this rodeo has already kicked off!
roy, will you be the referee, things may get bloody?

shawn
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:13 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F

All I gotta say about the Sherman is 'tanks for the nice desktop! Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:17 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F

Call it a hunch, but I suspect this thread won't wander too far from the front page without any special help from me.

As Neil has directed us to a clickable link to the PDF file, there's no need to upload it here, but as with all things in cyberspace ether, it's a good idea to save that article for those that are interested.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 1:54 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted Facts

Lets see if I have the quote thing figured out

- Neil_Baumgardner

However the British doctrine of mixing a Firefly in every tank platoon seems to have worked fairly well. While you might not have wanted to put an M6 or T23 in every Sherman platoon, you could have put a heavy tank platoon in every company for example. That would have ensured a good distribution on the battlefield.

IMO, the problems with Tank Destroyer doctrine were: 1) tank destroyers couldnt stand up in fights due to lighter armor; 2) tank destroyers were held at divisional level, which ensured they were almost never where they were needed...



Well the U.S. solved the problem the same way, by mixing 76mm Shermans in platoons with 75mm tanks. One problem was that the Armored Divisions got first dibs on the 76mm gunned tanks so had replaced almost all their 75mm tanks before the independent battalions got any. The British didn't have this problem as bad because their 'independent battalions' were equiped with Churchills and so never got a chance to get Fireflys (adopting a Panther was one posssible solution :-))

I'll admit that I'm trying to seperate the doctrine problem from the equipment problem. The U.S. already had two different types of companies in a Battalion. Three companies of Shermans and One company of Stuarts. Granted we could think about replacing the Stuarts with a Heavy company but How many tanks would that have taken? My sources are at home but how many battalions were deployed in Europe? There were 14(?) Armored Divisions each with 6 battalions (?) that would be 84 companies of heavies. At 17 tanks per company that would be 1428 tanks just assigned to Armored Divisions. That doesn't allow for pipeline, spares, training, etc. That still leaves the independent battalions without a 'Cat Killer' I think there was almost one independent Battalion for each Infantry Division so with 40+ Infantry Divisions in Europe that would be another 40 companies for another 680 tanks. We are now up to over 2000. To get 2000 tanks in the field in September 1944 when would the production decision have to be made? I suspect September of 43 at the latest ( I actually think it would have been before January of 43)


Granted, but let me turn this a little way. Did the Germans only blow up bridges on the Western front? While the Rhein is much bigger, there are certainly lots of rivers to cross in Poland. How come the Soviets dont seem to have had much a problem getting their KV-1s & JS-2s across those rivers? Basically, I have a hard time believing that the US industrial juggernaught could not have solved this bridging problem if there had been some advance planning for the introduction of US heavy tanks.


Well the Soviet army worked on a 'prep for three months then sprint to the next river' 'prep for three months sprint till you run out of supplies' mode. Very often the river crossing was the first, well prepared stage of the offensive. The Western allies tried to keep a continuous offense running crossing obsticals as they were reached. I also think terrain is a bigger problem in western Europe then in Eastern Europe. The Soviets also standardised on a wider gauge. I do not belived they used standardised bridging components as much.



I'll admit this is the crux of the problem - Hindsight 20-20 of how dangerous Panthers & Tigers would be in 44. There's very little time from June 44 to May 45 to turn around any production decisions. So basically any changes would have had to have been decided upon before Normandy.

They would have had to come up with a new armored turret for that 90mm gun, but that does seem like a minor problem. It seems like there were several different options available to the US at the time - M6s, T23s, and upgraded Shermans - but none were taken into service unfortunately.

Neil


The limited time is the crux of the problem. But I think that the design of the Sherman made it possible to get a 90mm deployed. If you use a T23 turret (the one used for the 76mm) you only need towork up a new front mount and Mantlet. The entire gun system is connected to the unit bolted in the front of the turret. That was why it was so easy to mount the 17pdr in the Sherman turret. After the war they even mounted the 76mm in the original turret for MAP sales. so converting a gunmount from an M36 should have been straightforward that would only require thickening the armor on teh M36 mantlet and possibly putting some counterweight (applique armor?) on the aft flanks of the Sherman turret to keep the rotating balance. then replace the ammo storage (which was worked out for the M36B1 which used M4A3 hulls) and issue to units.

I know for once I am oversimplifying but I wanted to make the point that we didn't need an all new turret. There was an upgraded Sherman, the M4A3E8, on its way. The Northwest European Campaign just completed much faster than expected. ( I think some 'projections' had the allies stopping at the Seine to build up supplies for several months and the push into central Germany not happening till the summer of 45. That timeframe would have allowed many more units to be equiped with 76mm Shermans and Pershings.

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 1:56 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted Facts

- SHAWN
Woah!!! debating the pros and cons of the sherman here again...
i guess this rodeo has already kicked off!
roy, will you be the referee, things may get bloody?

shawn


I don't think it will get bloody. Most of us are gentlemen here, and the others we'll beat to a pulp so quick they won't have time to bleed Twisted Evil

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:03 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted Facts

- bsmart
- SHAWN
Woah!!! debating the pros and cons of the sherman here again...
i guess this rodeo has already kicked off!
roy, will you be the referee, things may get bloody?

shawn


I don't think it will get bloody. Most of us are gentlemen here, and the others we'll beat to a pulp so quick they won't have time to bleed Twisted Evil



Which makes my few duties here just soooooo much easier. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:18 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F

Hi Folks!

This post will try to look at the bridging problems.

When the developers started drawing up the Sherman tank, they were limited in how much it could weight. That limit came for the Combat Bridging Engineers M2 Treadway Pontoon bridge system.

In the first photo you can see that the saddles (the metal frame) that holds up the treadways and spread the load out acrossed the pontoon is at or below water level. The tank is a M4A1 VVSS 75mm version. It is pressing the limits of that bridge system to support the vehicle. That bridge could not have support the M-6 or T-23 heavy tanks. Notice the clearance between the treadway edges and the VVSS track block. Just a few inchs to spare on both sides. No room for a wider tank. No room for M4 with HVSS!

This photo is from Hunnicutt's Sherman book, page 182, M4A1s loading into an LST April 6 1943.



In the next photo we see another M4A1 VVSS 75 crossing a treadway bridge over the "Durance River in southern France on 25 August 1944."
The pontoons are larger and the saddles are above water.

This photo is from Stevn J. Zaloga's The M4 Sherman at War, The European Theatre 1942-1945, page 22


Why is this important? Between April 1943 and August 1944, someone had to request that the Engineer Command be allocated more steel for larger saddles and more rubber for larger pontoons. I don't have any facts yet, but I would not be surpised if the Engineer Command also needed larger or heavier cargo trucks to carry the larger pontoons with their larger and heavier saddles. All items that needed room within the available shipping space and had to get to the ETO.

Why ship heavier tanks if what you have can just bearly do the job for the vehicle you already have? Why ship heavier tanks that will be left behind at the first large ditch or smallest of rivers?

Is this the one and over all stopper to heavier tanks? NO! It is just ONE of many problems that added up to the idea that the Sherman is 1. Good enough (at first), and 2. it's to late, it will have to do for now.

I seam to remember of picture of T-23 crossing a Bailey Bridge. As soon as I can find it, I will add it to this post.

Spot Report!
Sgt, Scouts Out! Smile

P.S.
Sorry Shawn, I can't be a ref for this one. I am one of those guys who before hanging out here, bought all that Sherman was no good and why couldn't this country do better point of view. I am now one of those guys who thinks those who did it, did the best they could at the time and for anything to have been done different, changes would have had to have been made long before the post D-Day battles exposed the Sherman's weakness vis German Cats.

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.


Last edited by Roy_A_Lingle on Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:41 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:03 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F

- Roy_A_Lingle

When the developers started drawing up the Sherman tank, they were limited in how much it could weight. That limit came for the Combat Bridging Engineers M2 Treadway Pontoon bridge system.

<snip>That bridge could not have support the M-6 or T-23 heavy tanks. Notice the clearance between the treadway edges and the VVSS track block. Just a few inchs to spare on both sides. No room for a wider tank. No room for M4 with HVSS!


I'm sorry, but this sounds to me like putting the cart before the horse, or in this case the bridge before the tank... The bridge is designed to support the tank, the tank is designed to destroy infantry, fight tanks, etc, not to support the bridge. I understand this argument a little better when you're talking shipping, airlift or even rail-transport - for the first two at least you may have pretty big design constraints.

Designing the tank to fit the bridge seems a little backwards to me. Seems like if you decide you're going to have heavier tanks, you design bridges to handle said tanks - not decide you cant have heavier tanks because your current bridges cant handle them... Afterall, I would think its easier to design & build new heavier bridges than a heavier tank...


Why is this important? Between April 1943 and August 1944, someone had to request that the Engineer Command be allocated more steel for larger saddles and more rubber for larger pontoons. I don't have any facts yet, but I would not be surpised if the Engineer Command also needed larger or heavier cargo trucks to carry the larger pontoons with their larger and heavier saddles. All items that needed room within the available shipping space and had to get to the ETO.


I'll admit I am expecting quite possibly too much centralized planning & forethought than was present.

But when set against the context of the vast production output of the United States during WWII, including the immense shipping capacity - I am starting to "buy" less and less the shipping constraints issue. Especially considering the wasted space & tonnage taken up by shipping Shermans (and all the bridging to carry them) that get killed vs Cats vice a smaller amount of heavier tanks. In terms of shipping tonnage per kill, the balance still appears to be tipped in favor of heavier tanks. But again, hindsight is 20-20...


Why ship heavier tanks if what you have can just bearly do the job for the vehicle you already have? Why ship heavier tanks that will be left behind at the first large ditch or smallest of rivers?


I just suspect the river issue is not that big. Bridging could have been designed & shipped to support heavier tanks, assuming the forethough had been there c1943 that this was the plan... 20-20 hindsight, it would appear that this lesson might have been learned from the encounters with the Tiger in North Africa...

At the very least, the Brits somehow understood that more firepower was needed, on the tank... Was it really productionization that killed Firefly acceptance in the US? If I remember correctly, it was a lack of recognition of the need for such firepower & resistance to a new round...


Is this the one and over all stopper to heavier tanks? NO! It is just ONE of many problems that added up to the idea that the Sherman is 1. Good enough (at first), and 2. it's to late, it will have to do for now.


Agree with the "will have to do for now" part. Again, what I'm expecting is forethought c1943... That being said, if the forethought had been there, I think all of these other issues could have been rather easily solved - and at a better usage of "limited" shipping.


I seam to remember of picture of T-23 crossing a Bailey Bridge. As so as I can find it, I will add it to this post.


That would be interesting...


Sorry Shawn, I can't be a ref for this one. I am one of those guys who before hanging out here, bought all that Sherman was no good and why couldn't this country do better point of view. I am now one of those guys who thinks those who did it, did the best they could at the time and for anything to have been done different, changes would have had to have been made long before the post D-Day battles exposed the Sherman's weakness vis German Cats.


Ironically I've probably come the other way... I certainly think the Sherman was a pretty good tank that was able to do much of its job fairly well & fairly reliably. But I now am probably at the conclusion that there was too much institutional resistance to the lessons emerging from North Africa (ie the ones the Brits understood at least) and that decisions could have been made in '43 to include a number of heavier tanks for Normandy & beyond...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 7:35 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted Facts

Neil - I think you are expecting much to fast reaction time from the planning process. Many of the production decisions that affected deployment in Normandy were made in 1942. They were constantly being examined and modified but the lead time for these items was long. They not only had to be produced but sent to a port, stored while it waited for a ship loaded on a ship, the ship themn had to wait for a convoy to assemble. Then the convoy plodded across the Atlantic at 6-8 knots. When it made it to Britian it would wait in the harbor for it's turn to unload. It would then be stored in a field until it was time to start loading for the trip across the Channel. Then it would be unloaded and wait until it was needed to be issued to troops.

I really wish we had shipping records for some of the vehicles and tanks that were used by units in Europe. I think you would be surprised at the time from factory acceptance to actual issue to line units.

Also while I find Roys photos very interesting it isn't the bridging problem I've read about. The problem I remember had to do with the width of the road panels of the bailey kits. There was a modification kit thatwidened the roadwaybut without the modification the Pershing would damage the sides of the trackways and the braces supporting them weakening the bridge. The modification kits were available but not in large enough quantitys to allow them to be issued to every bridging unit.

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 7:55 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted Facts

- bsmart
Neil - I think you are expecting much to fast reaction time from the planning process. Many of the production decisions that affected deployment in Normandy were made in 1942. They were constantly being examined and modified but the lead time for these items was long. They not only had to be produced but sent to a port, stored while it waited for a ship loaded on a ship, the ship themn had to wait for a convoy to assemble. Then the convoy plodded across the Atlantic at 6-8 knots. When it made it to Britian it would wait in the harbor for it's turn to unload. It would then be stored in a field until it was time to start loading for the trip across the Channel. Then it would be unloaded and wait until it was needed to be issued to troops.


Granted, totally, utterly granted... However, at least in terms of a better armed Sherman (setting heavier tanks aside for a moment), I have hard time believing the British industrial base was more agile than the American industrial base in the ability to get Sherman Fireflies or 90s into the field... Even so, it does seem a little shortsighted to me, to not plan for sending any heavier tanks (even starting in 1942), be they M6s or T23s, etc.

I guess my point is we had heavier tanks under development or even in limited production & fielding. We certainly had the shipping to get them there, in time even. And we could have built better bridges to handle them. At the very least, a better armed Sherman could have been fielded. But no one saw the need in 1942/1943...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:07 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted Facts

BTW, while I know this is the exception, not the rule - but the M26 Pershing went from first acceptance (November '44) to combat in Europe (February '45 - the Zebra Mission) in no less than 4 months...

If a similiar expedited effort had been mounted (again, with "malice forethought," etc), you could have had M6s ready in the UK by March '43 (from a December '42 first acceptance), M6A1s in the UK by April '43 (from a January '42 first acceptance), or T23s in the UK by January 1944 (from an October '43 first acceptance). The latter is just in time for Normandy...

And we're talking first acceptance to in combat. Nevermind training in between. I know this was not the norm, but it could have been done...

With the same timelines, how soon could we have had US Sherman Fireflies or 90s in the field? Certainly in limited numbers at first, but quickly growing.

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 4
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum