±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 1045
Total: 1045
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Photo Gallery
02: Home
03: Home
04: Community Forums
05: Home
06: Home
07: Home
08: Home
09: Home
10: Home
11: Home
12: Home
13: Downloads
14: Treasury
15: Home
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Home
19: Community Forums
20: Home
21: Home
22: Downloads
23: Home
24: Home
25: Home
26: Home
27: Home
28: Community Forums
29: Home
30: Community Forums
31: Home
32: Home
33: Home
34: Home
35: News Archive
36: Home
37: Home
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Home
41: Photo Gallery
42: Home
43: Community Forums
44: Home
45: Community Forums
46: Home
47: Community Forums
48: Tell a Friend
49: Statistics
50: Home
51: Downloads
52: Home
53: Home
54: Home
55: Home
56: Home
57: Home
58: Home
59: Home
60: Home
61: Home
62: Home
63: Community Forums
64: Photo Gallery
65: Home
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Home
69: Community Forums
70: Photo Gallery
71: Home
72: Home
73: Home
74: Community Forums
75: Photo Gallery
76: Home
77: Home
78: Home
79: Home
80: Home
81: Home
82: Home
83: Home
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Home
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Home
90: Community Forums
91: Home
92: Home
93: Home
94: Home
95: Home
96: Home
97: Home
98: Home
99: Photo Gallery
100: Home
101: Community Forums
102: Home
103: Community Forums
104: Downloads
105: Home
106: Home
107: Home
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Home
111: Home
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Home
115: Home
116: Home
117: Home
118: Home
119: Home
120: Community Forums
121: Home
122: Home
123: Photo Gallery
124: Home
125: Home
126: Home
127: Community Forums
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Home
134: Home
135: Home
136: Home
137: Home
138: Photo Gallery
139: Home
140: Home
141: Home
142: Member Screenshots
143: Statistics
144: Home
145: Home
146: Home
147: Home
148: News Archive
149: Community Forums
150: Home
151: Home
152: Downloads
153: Home
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Home
159: Home
160: Home
161: Community Forums
162: Home
163: Photo Gallery
164: Community Forums
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Community Forums
168: Home
169: Community Forums
170: Photo Gallery
171: Home
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Photo Gallery
175: Home
176: Community Forums
177: Home
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: Home
182: Home
183: Community Forums
184: Home
185: Home
186: Community Forums
187: Home
188: Photo Gallery
189: Home
190: Home
191: Community Forums
192: Home
193: Home
194: Community Forums
195: Home
196: Home
197: Home
198: Photo Gallery
199: Downloads
200: Home
201: Home
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Home
206: Home
207: Home
208: Community Forums
209: Home
210: Home
211: Home
212: Home
213: Home
214: Home
215: Home
216: Home
217: Home
218: Home
219: Home
220: Community Forums
221: Home
222: Home
223: Home
224: Home
225: Home
226: Home
227: Home
228: Home
229: Home
230: Home
231: Home
232: Home
233: Home
234: Home
235: Home
236: Home
237: Home
238: Home
239: Home
240: Home
241: Home
242: Community Forums
243: Photo Gallery
244: Home
245: Home
246: Community Forums
247: Home
248: Community Forums
249: Home
250: Community Forums
251: Home
252: Community Forums
253: Home
254: Home
255: Photo Gallery
256: Home
257: Photo Gallery
258: Home
259: Community Forums
260: Photo Gallery
261: Home
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Member Screenshots
265: Home
266: Home
267: Home
268: Home
269: Home
270: Home
271: Community Forums
272: Home
273: Home
274: Community Forums
275: Photo Gallery
276: Home
277: Home
278: Home
279: Home
280: Community Forums
281: Home
282: Home
283: Home
284: Member Screenshots
285: Community Forums
286: Home
287: Home
288: Community Forums
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Home
293: Home
294: Home
295: Home
296: Home
297: Home
298: Community Forums
299: Home
300: Photo Gallery
301: Home
302: Home
303: Home
304: Community Forums
305: Home
306: Home
307: Community Forums
308: Home
309: Home
310: Home
311: Home
312: Home
313: Home
314: Home
315: Photo Gallery
316: Home
317: Photo Gallery
318: Home
319: Home
320: Home
321: Home
322: Home
323: Home
324: Home
325: Home
326: Home
327: Photo Gallery
328: Downloads
329: Home
330: News Archive
331: Home
332: Home
333: Home
334: Home
335: Community Forums
336: Home
337: Community Forums
338: Home
339: Community Forums
340: Community Forums
341: Home
342: Community Forums
343: Photo Gallery
344: Community Forums
345: Home
346: Home
347: Home
348: Home
349: Home
350: Downloads
351: Home
352: Home
353: Home
354: Home
355: Home
356: Home
357: Home
358: Community Forums
359: Community Forums
360: Home
361: Home
362: Home
363: Home
364: Community Forums
365: Home
366: Home
367: Home
368: Home
369: Home
370: Home
371: Home
372: Home
373: Community Forums
374: Community Forums
375: Home
376: Home
377: Home
378: Community Forums
379: Community Forums
380: Home
381: Home
382: Home
383: Photo Gallery
384: Community Forums
385: Home
386: Home
387: Home
388: Home
389: Community Forums
390: Home
391: Home
392: Home
393: Home
394: Home
395: Home
396: Community Forums
397: Home
398: Community Forums
399: Home
400: Home
401: Home
402: Home
403: Home
404: Home
405: Community Forums
406: Photo Gallery
407: Home
408: Community Forums
409: Home
410: Home
411: Photo Gallery
412: Home
413: Home
414: Home
415: Home
416: Home
417: Home
418: Home
419: Home
420: Home
421: Home
422: Community Forums
423: Community Forums
424: Home
425: Downloads
426: Community Forums
427: Community Forums
428: Community Forums
429: Home
430: Home
431: Home
432: Community Forums
433: Home
434: Home
435: Home
436: Community Forums
437: Home
438: Home
439: Community Forums
440: Home
441: Home
442: Community Forums
443: Home
444: Home
445: Home
446: Home
447: Home
448: Community Forums
449: Home
450: Photo Gallery
451: Community Forums
452: Community Forums
453: Community Forums
454: Home
455: Home
456: Photo Gallery
457: Home
458: Community Forums
459: Home
460: Community Forums
461: Home
462: Home
463: Home
464: Home
465: Home
466: News Archive
467: Home
468: Home
469: Home
470: Home
471: Community Forums
472: Home
473: Home
474: Home
475: Home
476: Home
477: Community Forums
478: Home
479: Home
480: Community Forums
481: Community Forums
482: Home
483: Home
484: Home
485: Home
486: Community Forums
487: Home
488: Home
489: Community Forums
490: Community Forums
491: Home
492: Community Forums
493: Photo Gallery
494: Home
495: Home
496: Home
497: Home
498: Home
499: Home
500: Home
501: Home
502: Home
503: Home
504: Community Forums
505: Home
506: Community Forums
507: Home
508: Community Forums
509: Home
510: Community Forums
511: Home
512: Community Forums
513: Community Forums
514: Home
515: Home
516: Home
517: Home
518: Home
519: Home
520: Home
521: Downloads
522: Home
523: Home
524: Home
525: Home
526: Home
527: Photo Gallery
528: Home
529: Home
530: Home
531: Home
532: Home
533: Home
534: Home
535: Home
536: Home
537: Home
538: Home
539: Community Forums
540: Home
541: Home
542: Home
543: Community Forums
544: Home
545: News Archive
546: Community Forums
547: Community Forums
548: Home
549: Home
550: Home
551: Home
552: Home
553: Home
554: Community Forums
555: Home
556: Photo Gallery
557: Community Forums
558: Home
559: Home
560: Home
561: Home
562: Community Forums
563: Home
564: Home
565: Home
566: Downloads
567: Photo Gallery
568: Photo Gallery
569: Community Forums
570: Community Forums
571: Home
572: Home
573: Home
574: Home
575: Home
576: Community Forums
577: Home
578: Home
579: Home
580: Photo Gallery
581: Community Forums
582: Home
583: Home
584: Home
585: Community Forums
586: Home
587: Home
588: Home
589: Home
590: Home
591: Photo Gallery
592: Community Forums
593: Member Screenshots
594: Community Forums
595: Photo Gallery
596: Photo Gallery
597: Community Forums
598: Community Forums
599: Home
600: Home
601: Home
602: Home
603: Home
604: Home
605: Home
606: Photo Gallery
607: Home
608: Home
609: Community Forums
610: Community Forums
611: Community Forums
612: Home
613: Home
614: Community Forums
615: Home
616: Home
617: Home
618: Home
619: Community Forums
620: Home
621: Home
622: Home
623: Home
624: Downloads
625: Community Forums
626: Home
627: Home
628: Home
629: Community Forums
630: Home
631: Community Forums
632: Community Forums
633: Community Forums
634: Home
635: Home
636: Home
637: Home
638: Member Screenshots
639: Community Forums
640: Home
641: Home
642: Home
643: Home
644: Home
645: Home
646: Home
647: Home
648: Home
649: Home
650: Home
651: Home
652: Home
653: Home
654: Community Forums
655: Home
656: Home
657: Home
658: Home
659: Photo Gallery
660: Home
661: Home
662: Home
663: Community Forums
664: Photo Gallery
665: Photo Gallery
666: Home
667: Community Forums
668: Community Forums
669: Community Forums
670: Community Forums
671: Photo Gallery
672: Downloads
673: Home
674: Community Forums
675: Community Forums
676: Downloads
677: Community Forums
678: Home
679: Home
680: Home
681: Community Forums
682: Home
683: Home
684: Home
685: Home
686: Home
687: Home
688: Your Account
689: Home
690: Home
691: Home
692: Home
693: Home
694: Home
695: Photo Gallery
696: Community Forums
697: Home
698: Home
699: Home
700: Downloads
701: Home
702: Home
703: Home
704: Home
705: Photo Gallery
706: Home
707: Community Forums
708: Community Forums
709: Home
710: Home
711: Home
712: Community Forums
713: Home
714: Home
715: Community Forums
716: Home
717: Downloads
718: Home
719: Home
720: Member Screenshots
721: Community Forums
722: News Archive
723: Home
724: Home
725: Home
726: Home
727: Home
728: Home
729: Community Forums
730: Home
731: Community Forums
732: Home
733: Home
734: Home
735: Community Forums
736: Home
737: Home
738: Home
739: Community Forums
740: Home
741: Home
742: Home
743: Home
744: Home
745: Home
746: Home
747: Home
748: Community Forums
749: Home
750: Home
751: Home
752: Home
753: Community Forums
754: Home
755: Downloads
756: Community Forums
757: Community Forums
758: Home
759: Home
760: Home
761: Home
762: Community Forums
763: Home
764: Home
765: Home
766: Home
767: Home
768: Home
769: Community Forums
770: Community Forums
771: Home
772: Home
773: Home
774: Home
775: Home
776: Home
777: Community Forums
778: Home
779: Community Forums
780: Home
781: Photo Gallery
782: Home
783: Community Forums
784: Home
785: Community Forums
786: Home
787: News Archive
788: Home
789: Home
790: Downloads
791: Home
792: Home
793: Community Forums
794: Home
795: Home
796: Home
797: Community Forums
798: Community Forums
799: Home
800: Home
801: Home
802: Home
803: Home
804: Community Forums
805: Home
806: Home
807: Home
808: Home
809: Home
810: Home
811: Home
812: Home
813: Photo Gallery
814: Home
815: Community Forums
816: Home
817: Home
818: Home
819: Home
820: Member Screenshots
821: Photo Gallery
822: Member Screenshots
823: Home
824: Photo Gallery
825: Home
826: Photo Gallery
827: Home
828: Community Forums
829: Home
830: Home
831: Home
832: Home
833: Home
834: Community Forums
835: Home
836: Home
837: Community Forums
838: Home
839: Home
840: Home
841: Home
842: Home
843: Member Screenshots
844: Community Forums
845: Home
846: Home
847: Home
848: Home
849: Home
850: Home
851: Home
852: Home
853: Home
854: Photo Gallery
855: Home
856: Photo Gallery
857: Home
858: Downloads
859: Statistics
860: Home
861: Home
862: Home
863: Home
864: News Archive
865: Home
866: Home
867: Community Forums
868: Home
869: Member Screenshots
870: Community Forums
871: Community Forums
872: Member Screenshots
873: Community Forums
874: Home
875: Community Forums
876: Community Forums
877: Home
878: Home
879: Community Forums
880: Community Forums
881: Community Forums
882: Home
883: Home
884: Home
885: Community Forums
886: Downloads
887: Community Forums
888: Home
889: Home
890: Home
891: Photo Gallery
892: Community Forums
893: Community Forums
894: Photo Gallery
895: Community Forums
896: Home
897: Home
898: Photo Gallery
899: Home
900: Home
901: Home
902: Home
903: Community Forums
904: Home
905: Photo Gallery
906: Home
907: Community Forums
908: Home
909: Home
910: Home
911: Community Forums
912: Home
913: Home
914: Home
915: Home
916: Home
917: Home
918: Community Forums
919: Home
920: Home
921: Home
922: Home
923: Home
924: Home
925: Home
926: Home
927: Home
928: Home
929: Home
930: Home
931: Home
932: Home
933: Home
934: Home
935: Home
936: News
937: Home
938: Community Forums
939: Community Forums
940: Community Forums
941: Community Forums
942: Community Forums
943: Community Forums
944: Member Screenshots
945: Community Forums
946: Home
947: Home
948: Community Forums
949: Photo Gallery
950: Home
951: News Archive
952: Community Forums
953: Home
954: Home
955: Home
956: Home
957: Home
958: Photo Gallery
959: Community Forums
960: Home
961: Community Forums
962: Home
963: Photo Gallery
964: Home
965: Community Forums
966: Photo Gallery
967: Home
968: Home
969: Community Forums
970: Home
971: Home
972: Home
973: Home
974: Home
975: Downloads
976: Home
977: Member Screenshots
978: Home
979: Home
980: Home
981: Home
982: Home
983: Community Forums
984: Home
985: Home
986: Home
987: Community Forums
988: Community Forums
989: Community Forums
990: Community Forums
991: Home
992: Home
993: Home
994: Home
995: Photo Gallery
996: Community Forums
997: Community Forums
998: Home
999: Home
1000: Member Screenshots
1001: Home
1002: Downloads
1003: Home
1004: Home
1005: Home
1006: Community Forums
1007: Member Screenshots
1008: News Archive
1009: Home
1010: Home
1011: Member Screenshots
1012: Community Forums
1013: Community Forums
1014: Home
1015: Home
1016: Home
1017: Home
1018: Home
1019: Community Forums
1020: Home
1021: Home
1022: Home
1023: Home
1024: Community Forums
1025: Home
1026: Home
1027: Photo Gallery
1028: Community Forums
1029: Home
1030: Photo Gallery
1031: Home
1032: Community Forums
1033: Home
1034: Home
1035: Community Forums
1036: Home
1037: Home
1038: Home
1039: Downloads
1040: Home
1041: Photo Gallery
1042: Home
1043: Community Forums
1044: Home
1045: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted Facts
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 8:06 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F

- Skeet

This same vet used to talk about the German 88's. A lot of what he spoke about seemed to indicate they could have been 88's. But a lot of what he said made me wonder how (why?) the German's could be using 88's like that, i.e. indirect fire into camps/parks on reverse slopes. I posted that question a while back, and the consenus was that lot's of WWII vets from the ETO referred to all German artillery as 88's.


In noticed that the German combat diaries I've seen all indicate that the 88 was frequently used in the indirect fire role. I recall specifically that this was so in North Africa in particular. So it's possible for indirect fire to have come from 88's. That said, I agree that Allied GI's had a tendency to call any incoming "88 fire".

C

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 9:05 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F


I don't know of any 76mm gun Shermans being issued to British units (Like the GAA engined M4A3 the U.S. tended to keep the 76mm Shermans for themselves, but 76mm gunned M4A2s were sent to the Soviets)


Yeah those miserly yanks only sold us 1,330 M4A1 w/76mm aka Sherman IIA and an unknown number of M4A3 w/76mm aka Sherman IVA. I beleive they went mostly to Italy. My units regimental history speaks of receiving them as replacements for the 75s until practically the whole regiment was 76mm equipped.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 9:41 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted Facts

Oddly enough you dont see very many pictures at all (at least that I have seen) of British Sherman 76s... Lots of 75s & Fireflies, but I cant remember any pictures of 76s in British colors...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Al_Bowie
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 34

PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:03 pm
Post subject: Distorted Facts

I love the wonderful thoughtless generalisations that such threads dredge up.
Particularly the one about a Panther being worth Four or Five Shermans. This gross generalisation is so wrong in the context of any rational discussion as to be laughable.
Consider this:
If those figures were true then the amount of Shermans deployed to the NWE theatre must have been greater than the actual number. Whilst a Panther in Defence (And I stress Defence - usually ambush) could take a number of Shermans to destoy it the truth also holds true for the Sherman as the battles at the closing of the Falaise pocket indicate and the early Cobra battles where the odds were reversed with up to 12 panthers being KO'd by A troop of Shermans in Defensive position.
Anyone who studies warfare will understand that the defender on prepared ground of his choosing holds all the trumps. The oncoming enemy may lose two or three tanks before even locating his assailant (as Michael Wittman found to his peril). This does not make it a better AFV by any stretch of the imagination. The other part to this is that the five vehicles lost whilst "stalking" the assailant may not all be attributed to the Assailant but its infantry screen or mutually supporting AT or AFV.
THe Panther was a mechanical basket case and was extremely unreliable. The Sherman on the other hand just kept going as wass evidenced in the Normandy breakouts by both US and Brit/Cwealth/Polish forces. The Brits were clocking up huge distances of road march which is extremely taxing on an armoured vehicle and still managed to keep it up. The much vaunted Panther and Tiger would have suffered up to 80% mechanical loss if they attempted the same thing.
The Sherman was an excellent product for the time and like the equally excellent T34 grew to meet the threat. The HVAP 76 mm Shermans with HVAP were a pretty good match for the Panther and even Tiger an could engage these at good battle ranges.
The ability to produce the Sherman easily and in Huge numbers was a very decisive factor and if you did an analysis based on cost effectiveness I know that the Panther would not win.

The other factor overlooked in most of these arguments is the quality of the German Tank crews who had vast experience at both offensive and defensive operations by the time Normandy occured. Most of the US and Brit Formations were rank amatueurs at this in comparison. The integrated all arms philoshphy of the Germans also added to this.

With the exception of the T34 no other ww2 vehicle has had such a career or was so adaptable as to still be going with such success at the end of the War. If the Germans had abandoned the Panther and tiger and concentrated on upgrading the Pz IV family then the numbers they would have had avail and the reliability these proven designs had would have offered more vehicles and some of the results of history may have varied.

Logistics is the lynch pin of any camapign and the ability to support one major type of tank lowers the logisic burden thereby allow your logisic chain to function at its max efficiency. Diluting your logistics across a diverse range of vehicle types reduces your logistic efficiency severly hampering your ability to conduct mobile operations.

The Sherman is a much maligned and denigrated vehicle but to misquote a cartoon of the time "It got their the fastest with the mostest" and did the job asked of it. If some decisions such as arming a percentage of Shermans with the 17pdr in both US and Brit service had been taken earlier along with the introduction of the 76 armed HVSS shermans then it would have had a lot more success but hindsight is onl avail after the fact.

Cheers
Al Bowie
Dedicated Shermaholic
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:46 pm
Post subject: Re: Distorted Facts

- Al_Bowie
I love the wonderful thoughtless generalisations that such threads dredge up.
Particularly the one about a Panther being worth Four or Five Shermans. This gross generalisation is so wrong in the context of any rational discussion as to be laughable.
Consider this:
If those figures were true then the amount of Shermans deployed to the NWE theatre must have been greater than the actual number. Whilst a Panther in Defence (And I stress Defence - usually ambush) could take a number of Shermans to destoy it the truth also holds true for the Sherman as the battles at the closing of the Falaise pocket indicate and the early Cobra battles where the odds were reversed with up to 12 panthers being KO'd by A troop of Shermans in Defensive position.
Anyone who studies warfare will understand that the defender on prepared ground of his choosing holds all the trumps. The oncoming enemy may lose two or three tanks before even locating his assailant (as Michael Wittman found to his peril). This does not make it a better AFV by any stretch of the imagination. The other part to this is that the five vehicles lost whilst "stalking" the assailant may not all be attributed to the Assailant but its infantry screen or mutually supporting AT or AFV.


I'll admit a bit more thorough research is needed into WWII kill ratios. However, even if the generalization/anecdote its true (which I havent seen any contest with actual data), its likely not the case that there would have had to have been more Shermans than there were. It simply would mean that of Sherman vs Panther/Tiger engagements, that was the kill ratio, keeping in mind that such engagements would be a subset of all engagements that took place. I'm sure there were plenty of Panthers & Tigers that were not destroyed by Shermans, or even tanks. Therefore they dont contribute to the kill ratio. Similarly, not all Shermans faced Panthers & Tigers, so any number of Shermans would not contribute to the kill ratio either...

If someone could point me in the direction of any sort of accumulation of WWII tank kill ratio data I'd appreciate it.


THe Panther was a mechanical basket case and was extremely unreliable. The Sherman on the other hand just kept going as wass evidenced in the Normandy breakouts by both US and Brit/Cwealth/Polish forces. The Brits were clocking up huge distances of road march which is extremely taxing on an armoured vehicle and still managed to keep it up. The much vaunted Panther and Tiger would have suffered up to 80% mechanical loss if they attempted the same thing.


Granted, although I'd probably only describe the initial Panthers as true "basketcases." Keep in mind the Panther was good enough to have been kept in use by the French army until the early 1950s; and were also prized by Soviet crews, so much that they impressed Germany personnel to keep them going...


The Sherman was an excellent product for the time and like the equally excellent T34 grew to meet the threat. The HVAP 76 mm Shermans with HVAP were a pretty good match for the Panther and even Tiger an could engage these at good battle ranges.


While I think the Sherman was a great & venerable tank, I wouldnt argue it grew as much as the T-34, at least during WWII. The Soviets upgraded the T-34 with the 85mm gun during the war, while it took the French and Israelis to upgrade the Sherman with similar weapons post-war...


The ability to produce the Sherman easily and in Huge numbers was a very decisive factor and if you did an analysis based on cost effectiveness I know that the Panther would not win.


I wouldnt argue that the US should have producted Panthers instead of Shermans, but that a cost-effective heavier tank could have been fielded (likely by Normandy if they acted quickly enough & with foresight) as a complement to Sherman and would have been a good use of "limited" shipping.


With the exception of the T34 no other ww2 vehicle has had such a career or was so adaptable as to still be going with such success at the end of the War. If the Germans had abandoned the Panther and tiger and concentrated on upgrading the Pz IV family then the numbers they would have had avail and the reliability these proven designs had would have offered more vehicles and some of the results of history may have varied.


Part of the success & adaptability of the T-34 and Sherman is due to the fact that the US & USSR won WWII, leading to several generations of improvements afterwards. If the Germans had won (thank god not!), I have no doubt we would have seen 88mm armed Panthers and quite possibly even eventually 105mm armed Panthers in the postwar years. I'm not so sure (especially taking the French experience) that the Tiger or Tiger II would have had the same longevity...


The Sherman is a much maligned and denigrated vehicle but to misquote a cartoon of the time "It got their the fastest with the mostest" and did the job asked of it. If some decisions such as arming a percentage of Shermans with the 17pdr in both US and Brit service had been taken earlier along with the introduction of the 76 armed HVSS shermans then it would have had a lot more success but hindsight is onl avail after the fact.


Well that at least I agree with!

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:03 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted Facts

I don't have data at hand but I'm not sure there was much difference between the 85mm in the T34 and the 76mm in the Sherman. Both were moderate upgrades from the original gun but neither was the very high velocity gun that the 17pdr or 75L70 of the Panther were. I'm not sure the French post war experience with the Panther proves or disproves the tanks reliability. It wasa peacetime army with peacetime priorities. I doubt they were run hard at all.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:20 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted Facts

- bsmart
I don't have data at hand but I'm not sure there was much difference between the 85mm in the T34 and the 76mm in the Sherman. Both were moderate upgrades from the original gun but neither was the very high velocity gun that the 17pdr or 75L70 of the Panther were.


I stand corrected, it appears the 76mm HVAP had somewhat to much better penetration than the Soviet 85mm gun.

Tony Williams gave the following values on another board for penetration at 1,000 yards, striking at 30 degrees from the optimum:
forum.axishistory.com/...41edd627bf

76mm: 89mm (134mm with HVAP ammo)
17 pdr: 118mm (170mm with APDS ammo)
85mm: 84mm

The following also gives penetration values for the Sherman 76 & T-34/85 against the Tiger I:
www.fprado.com/armorsite/tiger1.htm

Neil


Last edited by Neil_Baumgardner on Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:23 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:22 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F

- Neil_Baumgardner
Oddly enough you dont see very many pictures at all (at least that I have seen) of British Sherman 76s... Lots of 75s & Fireflies, but I cant remember any pictures of 76s in British colors...

Neil


Just a quick google...




_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:25 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted Facts

Jim, thanks. For whatever reason, I dont remember seeing any pics of British Sherman 76s before... Were there any British Easy Eights?

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:30 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F

- Neil_Baumgardner
Jim, thanks. For whatever reason, I dont remember seeing any pics of British Sherman 76s before...

Neil


I think there must have been quite a few in Italy - strangely enough not many fireflies... must have been because of the 76mm shermans.



I hadn't realised that the british used Chaffee's during the war till I was going through the regimental photo albums once and spotted that the 9th Lancers had them in the recce troop during early 1945.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 12:28 am
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F

- JimWeb
- Neil_Baumgardner
Jim, thanks. For whatever reason, I dont remember seeing any pics of British Sherman 76s before...

Neil


I think there must have been quite a few in Italy - strangely enough not many fireflies... must have been because of the 76mm shermans.


See - even the British thought the 76mm Sherman was equivalent to a Firefly!! Laughing Laughing Laughing

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Al_Bowie
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 34

PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 1:27 am
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F

British use of the 76 Sherman.
The British were supplied with a great number of 76 M4A1 VVSS Shermans but mainly used them in Italy. They were used by 2 RTR and the South African 6 AD there. One of the Shots above is a C Sqn 2 RTR vehicle. Interestingly the Brits put a Firefly in each troop of 2 RTR and had a 4 veh tp consisting of 2 76 and 2 Fireflies by wars end. The Brits decided not to employ the 76 Sherman in NWE and passed the vehicles to the Polish who used them in Holland / Germany. They also retained their Fireflies in each tp.
There is anecdotal evidence to indicate that Guards AD got some 76's by wars end.
The Brits were going to acquire the M4A2 76 HVSS and got about 9 of these for trials by wars end. This is the variant the Canadians settled on post war although they took A3's to Korea from US stock to ease the logistical burden.
The only other HVSS vehicle the Brits got was the M4 105 in very ltd numbers in Italy (most went to the Poles).

BTW the point I made about numbers does not indicate that the Panther killed 5 shermans for itself being killed. these would have been killed by a variety of threats such as infantry AT, AT and mutually supporting tanks. I notice you completely overlook the fact that the Panthers were fighting in sited defence giving them a three to one theoretical advantage to start with. If you analyse the Normandy / Falaise and cobra period battles where the Germans were forced to counterattack against vehicles in defensive position the ratios are about 3 to one in favourr of the Sherman highlighting the fact that it is the situation more than the vehicle that accts for the discrepency.

My comments regarding the longevity if you re read them are WW2 related and NOT post war although the Sherman did continue for a long period post war.
THe French used the Panthers ONLY until the US MAP could provide significant amounts of 76 Shermans and a ltd amount of Pershings. If you can get hold of the Shrivenam Report on the Panther from the ones the Brits trialled you will see its reputation far exceeds its capabilities and the Late Panther was as equal a basket case reliability wise as the early ones. Its breakdown rate was lower but it was still extremely high. The only thing the Brits liked about the Panther was the Gun and Optics. The French liked the Gun also and developed it post war. The guns in the M50 and M51 Israeli Shermans are direct descendants of the Panthers excellent 75.
Cheers
Al
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:12 am
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F

- bsmart
I'm not sure the French post war experience with the Panther proves or disproves the tanks reliability. It wasa peacetime army with peacetime priorities. I doubt they were run hard at all.


Personnally, I think that the French army had Panthers because it had nothing better, and was not allowed to produce its own tanks in late 40's. When you look at the uniforms of the French Expeditionary Corps in Indochina, you will see american, british, german, french equipement from WW1 and WW2, and even local or "field" made equipement. We didn't have a standard uniform. (and even now you will find in some French Army units, WW1 and WW2 equipment that are kept in stock, just in case..) That's typically a French problem that we still face today : NOT ENOUGH MONEY !!! and not enough spare parts to repair our vehicles. I have heard that 60% of our planes can't fly because of the lack of spare parts..
So I really think that the French army would not have used Panther tanks in the 50's if they had the choice..

Cheers from France

Pierre-Olivier
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
LeeW
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 61

PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:04 am
Post subject: Re: Distorted Facts

- Neil_Baumgardner
...
While I think the Sherman was a great & venerable tank, I wouldnt argue it grew as much as the T-34, at least during WWII. The Soviets upgraded the T-34 with the 85mm gun during the war, while it took the French and Israelis to upgrade the Sherman with similar weapons post-war...

Well the US did have 105mm armed Shermans in WWII. The T-34 also had a lot more room for improvement. The T-34 76 didn't have a radio for the most part, lousey ergonomics, too small a turret, etc and the Soviet 76mm gun was inferior to the US 75 as you noticed the Soviet 85 was about the equivalant of the US 76 as far as AP performance goes but I think it's HE performance wasn't as good.


....
Part of the success & adaptability of the T-34 and Sherman is due to the fact that the US & USSR won WWII, leading to several generations of improvements afterwards. If the Germans had won (thank god not!), I have no doubt we would have seen 88mm armed Panthers and quite possibly even eventually 105mm armed Panthers in the postwar years. I'm not so sure (especially taking the French experience) that the Tiger or Tiger II would have had the same longevity...


Neither the US nor the Soviets really improved the M-4 or T-34 after the war. I'm not aware of many upgrades for the T-34 at all. The Sherman tended to be upgraded by third parties (Isreal, France, etc)
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:37 am
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F

- Al_Bowie

BTW the point I made about numbers does not indicate that the Panther killed 5 shermans for itself being killed. these would have been killed by a variety of threats such as infantry AT, AT and mutually supporting tanks. I notice you completely overlook the fact that the Panthers were fighting in sited defence giving them a three to one theoretical advantage to start with. If you analyse the Normandy / Falaise and cobra period battles where the Germans were forced to counterattack against vehicles in defensive position the ratios are about 3 to one in favourr of the Sherman highlighting the fact that it is the situation more than the vehicle that accts for the discrepency.


The 3-1 defense advantage rule is a rule of hand that dates back to Clausewitz, which can be adjusted to the particulars of any situation and may or may not have any validity. I will grant defense probably does have advantage, but whether its 2-1, 3-1, etc can vary... OTOH, there certainly have been many thinkers & generals, Patton may have been one of them, that believed in offensive advantage.


My comments regarding the longevity if you re read them are WW2 related and NOT post war although the Sherman did continue for a long period post war.


Okay, sure... Like I said, I'm not really denying that the Sherman as a very good versatile tank...


THe French used the Panthers ONLY until the US MAP could provide significant amounts of 76 Shermans and a ltd amount of Pershings.


I'm not so sure that is true, they kept them around far longer than was necessary by that measure - I dont think anyone had a want for Shermans in the early 1950s. Even the French 1947 report on the Panther (see 160-161 of Spielberger's Panther & its Variants) isnt exactly glowing. But my point is they respected it enough to keep it in service. I dont think they needed to for any other reason... The Soviets had the same respect for it, but they had plenty of JS-2s & -3s to go around. I believe the French Panthers were replaced by M47s... But I can see this discussion has becomes a tangent - Panther vs the Sherman rather than the utility of a hi-lo mix of heavier tanks to complement US Shermans...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 3 of 4
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum