±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 1057
Total: 1057
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Home
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Member Screenshots
08: Community Forums
09: Member Screenshots
10: Member Screenshots
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Home
17: Downloads
18: Community Forums
19: Member Screenshots
20: News Archive
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Member Screenshots
24: Community Forums
25: Home
26: Photo Gallery
27: Community Forums
28: Downloads
29: Community Forums
30: Home
31: Home
32: Home
33: Home
34: Downloads
35: Community Forums
36: Downloads
37: Community Forums
38: Home
39: News Archive
40: Community Forums
41: Downloads
42: Your Account
43: Downloads
44: Community Forums
45: News
46: Community Forums
47: Member Screenshots
48: Member Screenshots
49: Community Forums
50: Photo Gallery
51: Photo Gallery
52: Photo Gallery
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Photo Gallery
56: Photo Gallery
57: Community Forums
58: Home
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Downloads
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Home
65: Search
66: Home
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: News Archive
70: Photo Gallery
71: Photo Gallery
72: Your Account
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Member Screenshots
76: Member Screenshots
77: Community Forums
78: Home
79: Home
80: Community Forums
81: Member Screenshots
82: Community Forums
83: Member Screenshots
84: Photo Gallery
85: Member Screenshots
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Photo Gallery
94: Community Forums
95: Downloads
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Member Screenshots
99: Community Forums
100: Home
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Home
104: Photo Gallery
105: Photo Gallery
106: Photo Gallery
107: Member Screenshots
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Photo Gallery
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Community Forums
119: Community Forums
120: Photo Gallery
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Community Forums
124: Photo Gallery
125: Member Screenshots
126: Community Forums
127: Photo Gallery
128: Community Forums
129: News Archive
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Member Screenshots
133: News Archive
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Photo Gallery
146: Community Forums
147: Photo Gallery
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Community Forums
151: Community Forums
152: Home
153: Community Forums
154: Photo Gallery
155: Photo Gallery
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Downloads
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: Photo Gallery
165: Community Forums
166: Photo Gallery
167: Community Forums
168: Downloads
169: Photo Gallery
170: Photo Gallery
171: Home
172: Downloads
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Photo Gallery
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Home
180: Community Forums
181: Downloads
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Home
186: Photo Gallery
187: Community Forums
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: Community Forums
191: Home
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: News Archive
196: Community Forums
197: Photo Gallery
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums
204: Home
205: Home
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: News Archive
209: Home
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Member Screenshots
213: Photo Gallery
214: Photo Gallery
215: Photo Gallery
216: Photo Gallery
217: Community Forums
218: Photo Gallery
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Photo Gallery
222: Community Forums
223: Community Forums
224: Photo Gallery
225: Home
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Home
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Community Forums
233: Photo Gallery
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: Photo Gallery
239: Photo Gallery
240: Community Forums
241: Photo Gallery
242: Photo Gallery
243: Community Forums
244: Community Forums
245: Photo Gallery
246: Community Forums
247: Photo Gallery
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Photo Gallery
252: News Archive
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: Community Forums
256: Community Forums
257: Member Screenshots
258: Community Forums
259: Home
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Member Screenshots
264: Downloads
265: Member Screenshots
266: Community Forums
267: Photo Gallery
268: Photo Gallery
269: Photo Gallery
270: Photo Gallery
271: Community Forums
272: Community Forums
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Photo Gallery
276: Photo Gallery
277: Photo Gallery
278: Photo Gallery
279: Community Forums
280: Photo Gallery
281: Photo Gallery
282: Photo Gallery
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Home
286: Downloads
287: Community Forums
288: Photo Gallery
289: Community Forums
290: Photo Gallery
291: Community Forums
292: Photo Gallery
293: Your Account
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Photo Gallery
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Photo Gallery
300: Downloads
301: Downloads
302: Community Forums
303: Member Screenshots
304: Photo Gallery
305: Photo Gallery
306: Photo Gallery
307: Photo Gallery
308: Community Forums
309: Community Forums
310: Community Forums
311: Photo Gallery
312: Photo Gallery
313: Downloads
314: Community Forums
315: Photo Gallery
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: Member Screenshots
320: Home
321: Member Screenshots
322: Community Forums
323: Community Forums
324: Member Screenshots
325: Community Forums
326: Photo Gallery
327: Home
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: Home
331: Home
332: Downloads
333: Community Forums
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: Community Forums
337: Community Forums
338: Member Screenshots
339: Home
340: Community Forums
341: News Archive
342: Member Screenshots
343: Statistics
344: Community Forums
345: Member Screenshots
346: Statistics
347: Community Forums
348: Home
349: Community Forums
350: Community Forums
351: Community Forums
352: Photo Gallery
353: Photo Gallery
354: Community Forums
355: Member Screenshots
356: Community Forums
357: Home
358: Community Forums
359: Community Forums
360: Community Forums
361: Photo Gallery
362: Photo Gallery
363: Community Forums
364: Downloads
365: News Archive
366: Photo Gallery
367: Community Forums
368: Home
369: Photo Gallery
370: Community Forums
371: Community Forums
372: Photo Gallery
373: Community Forums
374: Community Forums
375: Community Forums
376: Community Forums
377: Community Forums
378: Community Forums
379: Community Forums
380: Community Forums
381: Community Forums
382: Member Screenshots
383: Downloads
384: Community Forums
385: Home
386: Community Forums
387: Home
388: Member Screenshots
389: Community Forums
390: News Archive
391: News Archive
392: Member Screenshots
393: Community Forums
394: Community Forums
395: Community Forums
396: Member Screenshots
397: Community Forums
398: Photo Gallery
399: Photo Gallery
400: Community Forums
401: Community Forums
402: Photo Gallery
403: Photo Gallery
404: Community Forums
405: Community Forums
406: Member Screenshots
407: Community Forums
408: Your Account
409: News Archive
410: Community Forums
411: Community Forums
412: Community Forums
413: Downloads
414: Community Forums
415: Community Forums
416: Community Forums
417: Community Forums
418: Community Forums
419: Photo Gallery
420: Community Forums
421: Community Forums
422: Community Forums
423: Community Forums
424: Community Forums
425: Photo Gallery
426: Photo Gallery
427: Photo Gallery
428: Community Forums
429: Downloads
430: Community Forums
431: Community Forums
432: Home
433: Community Forums
434: Community Forums
435: Photo Gallery
436: Photo Gallery
437: Community Forums
438: Home
439: Community Forums
440: Home
441: Community Forums
442: Photo Gallery
443: Community Forums
444: Community Forums
445: Community Forums
446: Downloads
447: Community Forums
448: Photo Gallery
449: Community Forums
450: Member Screenshots
451: Member Screenshots
452: Home
453: Community Forums
454: Community Forums
455: Home
456: Community Forums
457: Member Screenshots
458: Community Forums
459: Community Forums
460: Community Forums
461: Photo Gallery
462: Community Forums
463: Community Forums
464: Community Forums
465: Community Forums
466: Community Forums
467: Member Screenshots
468: Community Forums
469: Community Forums
470: Community Forums
471: Statistics
472: Photo Gallery
473: Home
474: News
475: Community Forums
476: Community Forums
477: Community Forums
478: Community Forums
479: Community Forums
480: Community Forums
481: Home
482: Community Forums
483: Community Forums
484: Community Forums
485: Community Forums
486: Photo Gallery
487: Community Forums
488: Community Forums
489: Photo Gallery
490: Community Forums
491: Community Forums
492: Community Forums
493: Photo Gallery
494: Photo Gallery
495: Downloads
496: Photo Gallery
497: Community Forums
498: Community Forums
499: News
500: Your Account
501: Community Forums
502: Community Forums
503: Photo Gallery
504: Your Account
505: Downloads
506: Downloads
507: Photo Gallery
508: Member Screenshots
509: Downloads
510: Community Forums
511: Community Forums
512: Community Forums
513: Downloads
514: Community Forums
515: Community Forums
516: Community Forums
517: Home
518: Community Forums
519: Home
520: Community Forums
521: Home
522: Community Forums
523: Community Forums
524: Community Forums
525: Home
526: News Archive
527: Home
528: Community Forums
529: Member Screenshots
530: News Archive
531: Member Screenshots
532: Photo Gallery
533: Community Forums
534: Photo Gallery
535: Photo Gallery
536: Community Forums
537: Community Forums
538: Community Forums
539: Community Forums
540: Community Forums
541: Home
542: Photo Gallery
543: Community Forums
544: Downloads
545: Community Forums
546: Community Forums
547: Community Forums
548: Community Forums
549: Community Forums
550: Home
551: Downloads
552: Your Account
553: Home
554: Community Forums
555: Your Account
556: News Archive
557: Photo Gallery
558: Community Forums
559: Home
560: Member Screenshots
561: Home
562: Community Forums
563: Community Forums
564: Photo Gallery
565: Home
566: Member Screenshots
567: Home
568: Community Forums
569: Member Screenshots
570: Community Forums
571: Photo Gallery
572: Community Forums
573: Member Screenshots
574: Photo Gallery
575: Community Forums
576: Member Screenshots
577: News Archive
578: Community Forums
579: Community Forums
580: Tell a Friend
581: Community Forums
582: Community Forums
583: Photo Gallery
584: Photo Gallery
585: News Archive
586: Photo Gallery
587: Community Forums
588: Photo Gallery
589: Community Forums
590: Statistics
591: Community Forums
592: News Archive
593: Your Account
594: Member Screenshots
595: Community Forums
596: Community Forums
597: Home
598: Community Forums
599: Community Forums
600: Community Forums
601: Photo Gallery
602: Community Forums
603: Community Forums
604: Community Forums
605: Downloads
606: Home
607: Home
608: Community Forums
609: Member Screenshots
610: Community Forums
611: Home
612: Community Forums
613: Member Screenshots
614: Community Forums
615: Community Forums
616: Community Forums
617: Home
618: Community Forums
619: Community Forums
620: Home
621: Community Forums
622: Community Forums
623: Community Forums
624: Downloads
625: Community Forums
626: Tell a Friend
627: Photo Gallery
628: Community Forums
629: Community Forums
630: Community Forums
631: Community Forums
632: Community Forums
633: Member Screenshots
634: Member Screenshots
635: Member Screenshots
636: Community Forums
637: News
638: Community Forums
639: Downloads
640: Community Forums
641: Community Forums
642: Member Screenshots
643: Home
644: Community Forums
645: Community Forums
646: Photo Gallery
647: Community Forums
648: Photo Gallery
649: Community Forums
650: Community Forums
651: News Archive
652: Downloads
653: Member Screenshots
654: Community Forums
655: Community Forums
656: Photo Gallery
657: News Archive
658: Community Forums
659: Community Forums
660: Community Forums
661: Community Forums
662: Community Forums
663: Member Screenshots
664: Community Forums
665: Community Forums
666: Home
667: Community Forums
668: Community Forums
669: Community Forums
670: Community Forums
671: Home
672: Member Screenshots
673: Photo Gallery
674: Community Forums
675: Photo Gallery
676: Community Forums
677: Community Forums
678: Photo Gallery
679: Community Forums
680: Community Forums
681: Community Forums
682: News Archive
683: Community Forums
684: Community Forums
685: Community Forums
686: Statistics
687: Community Forums
688: Community Forums
689: Community Forums
690: Home
691: Photo Gallery
692: Community Forums
693: Photo Gallery
694: Photo Gallery
695: Community Forums
696: Photo Gallery
697: Your Account
698: Member Screenshots
699: Photo Gallery
700: Home
701: Community Forums
702: Community Forums
703: Home
704: Community Forums
705: Member Screenshots
706: Treasury
707: Photo Gallery
708: Photo Gallery
709: Community Forums
710: Community Forums
711: Community Forums
712: Community Forums
713: News Archive
714: Community Forums
715: Home
716: Community Forums
717: Community Forums
718: Member Screenshots
719: Downloads
720: Downloads
721: Community Forums
722: Community Forums
723: Photo Gallery
724: Downloads
725: Community Forums
726: Community Forums
727: Community Forums
728: Community Forums
729: Home
730: Community Forums
731: Photo Gallery
732: Community Forums
733: Member Screenshots
734: Member Screenshots
735: Community Forums
736: Community Forums
737: Photo Gallery
738: Photo Gallery
739: Photo Gallery
740: Community Forums
741: Community Forums
742: Community Forums
743: Photo Gallery
744: Community Forums
745: Photo Gallery
746: Photo Gallery
747: Community Forums
748: Your Account
749: Photo Gallery
750: Community Forums
751: Community Forums
752: Photo Gallery
753: Photo Gallery
754: Community Forums
755: Photo Gallery
756: Photo Gallery
757: Community Forums
758: Community Forums
759: Photo Gallery
760: Downloads
761: Community Forums
762: Community Forums
763: Home
764: Community Forums
765: Home
766: Photo Gallery
767: Community Forums
768: Community Forums
769: Community Forums
770: Photo Gallery
771: Photo Gallery
772: Community Forums
773: Community Forums
774: Photo Gallery
775: Community Forums
776: Photo Gallery
777: Photo Gallery
778: Community Forums
779: Photo Gallery
780: Home
781: News Archive
782: Home
783: Photo Gallery
784: Community Forums
785: Photo Gallery
786: Photo Gallery
787: Photo Gallery
788: Photo Gallery
789: News Archive
790: Community Forums
791: Photo Gallery
792: Photo Gallery
793: Photo Gallery
794: Member Screenshots
795: Community Forums
796: Community Forums
797: Community Forums
798: Photo Gallery
799: Community Forums
800: Community Forums
801: Community Forums
802: Community Forums
803: Photo Gallery
804: Community Forums
805: Community Forums
806: Downloads
807: Member Screenshots
808: Photo Gallery
809: Community Forums
810: Photo Gallery
811: News Archive
812: Community Forums
813: Community Forums
814: Photo Gallery
815: Photo Gallery
816: Home
817: Community Forums
818: Community Forums
819: Photo Gallery
820: Community Forums
821: Community Forums
822: Photo Gallery
823: Member Screenshots
824: Photo Gallery
825: Community Forums
826: Photo Gallery
827: Photo Gallery
828: Community Forums
829: Photo Gallery
830: Member Screenshots
831: Downloads
832: Community Forums
833: Member Screenshots
834: Community Forums
835: Photo Gallery
836: Photo Gallery
837: Photo Gallery
838: Downloads
839: Community Forums
840: Photo Gallery
841: Community Forums
842: Community Forums
843: Photo Gallery
844: Community Forums
845: Photo Gallery
846: Community Forums
847: Community Forums
848: Home
849: Community Forums
850: Community Forums
851: Community Forums
852: Photo Gallery
853: Photo Gallery
854: Community Forums
855: Community Forums
856: Community Forums
857: Community Forums
858: Photo Gallery
859: Photo Gallery
860: Community Forums
861: Photo Gallery
862: Community Forums
863: Community Forums
864: Community Forums
865: Photo Gallery
866: Community Forums
867: Community Forums
868: Home
869: Community Forums
870: Community Forums
871: Community Forums
872: Community Forums
873: Community Forums
874: Photo Gallery
875: Photo Gallery
876: Community Forums
877: Photo Gallery
878: Photo Gallery
879: Community Forums
880: Photo Gallery
881: Statistics
882: Community Forums
883: Home
884: Community Forums
885: Photo Gallery
886: Member Screenshots
887: Community Forums
888: Community Forums
889: Photo Gallery
890: Community Forums
891: Community Forums
892: Community Forums
893: Member Screenshots
894: Member Screenshots
895: Home
896: Member Screenshots
897: Community Forums
898: Community Forums
899: Community Forums
900: Community Forums
901: Community Forums
902: Downloads
903: Community Forums
904: Community Forums
905: Member Screenshots
906: Member Screenshots
907: Community Forums
908: Home
909: Home
910: Community Forums
911: Member Screenshots
912: Community Forums
913: Community Forums
914: Community Forums
915: Photo Gallery
916: Statistics
917: Community Forums
918: Community Forums
919: Community Forums
920: Member Screenshots
921: Community Forums
922: Community Forums
923: Community Forums
924: Community Forums
925: Community Forums
926: Community Forums
927: Community Forums
928: Search
929: Community Forums
930: Photo Gallery
931: Photo Gallery
932: Community Forums
933: Home
934: Community Forums
935: Home
936: Community Forums
937: Community Forums
938: Statistics
939: Home
940: Community Forums
941: Photo Gallery
942: Downloads
943: Photo Gallery
944: News Archive
945: Member Screenshots
946: Downloads
947: Community Forums
948: Community Forums
949: Member Screenshots
950: Photo Gallery
951: Photo Gallery
952: Community Forums
953: Community Forums
954: Community Forums
955: Community Forums
956: Photo Gallery
957: Community Forums
958: Downloads
959: Community Forums
960: Member Screenshots
961: Community Forums
962: Community Forums
963: Member Screenshots
964: Community Forums
965: Community Forums
966: Community Forums
967: Community Forums
968: News
969: Statistics
970: Community Forums
971: Community Forums
972: Community Forums
973: Community Forums
974: Home
975: Community Forums
976: Community Forums
977: Photo Gallery
978: Community Forums
979: Photo Gallery
980: Community Forums
981: Member Screenshots
982: News Archive
983: News Archive
984: Downloads
985: Home
986: Community Forums
987: Community Forums
988: Community Forums
989: News Archive
990: Downloads
991: Home
992: Member Screenshots
993: Community Forums
994: Photo Gallery
995: Home
996: Photo Gallery
997: Community Forums
998: Community Forums
999: Home
1000: Downloads
1001: Home
1002: Home
1003: Community Forums
1004: Community Forums
1005: Home
1006: News Archive
1007: Community Forums
1008: Downloads
1009: Home
1010: Community Forums
1011: Photo Gallery
1012: Community Forums
1013: Photo Gallery
1014: Community Forums
1015: Community Forums
1016: Community Forums
1017: Community Forums
1018: Community Forums
1019: Downloads
1020: Community Forums
1021: Community Forums
1022: Home
1023: Photo Gallery
1024: Community Forums
1025: Community Forums
1026: Community Forums
1027: Community Forums
1028: Community Forums
1029: Member Screenshots
1030: Community Forums
1031: Home
1032: Home
1033: Photo Gallery
1034: Home
1035: Community Forums
1036: Home
1037: Community Forums
1038: Community Forums
1039: Community Forums
1040: Photo Gallery
1041: News Archive
1042: Downloads
1043: Statistics
1044: Community Forums
1045: Community Forums
1046: Community Forums
1047: Community Forums
1048: Community Forums
1049: Community Forums
1050: Member Screenshots
1051: Community Forums
1052: Community Forums
1053: Downloads
1054: Member Screenshots
1055: Community Forums
1056: Member Screenshots
1057: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted Facts
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 8:06 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F

- Skeet

This same vet used to talk about the German 88's. A lot of what he spoke about seemed to indicate they could have been 88's. But a lot of what he said made me wonder how (why?) the German's could be using 88's like that, i.e. indirect fire into camps/parks on reverse slopes. I posted that question a while back, and the consenus was that lot's of WWII vets from the ETO referred to all German artillery as 88's.


In noticed that the German combat diaries I've seen all indicate that the 88 was frequently used in the indirect fire role. I recall specifically that this was so in North Africa in particular. So it's possible for indirect fire to have come from 88's. That said, I agree that Allied GI's had a tendency to call any incoming "88 fire".

C

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 9:05 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F


I don't know of any 76mm gun Shermans being issued to British units (Like the GAA engined M4A3 the U.S. tended to keep the 76mm Shermans for themselves, but 76mm gunned M4A2s were sent to the Soviets)


Yeah those miserly yanks only sold us 1,330 M4A1 w/76mm aka Sherman IIA and an unknown number of M4A3 w/76mm aka Sherman IVA. I beleive they went mostly to Italy. My units regimental history speaks of receiving them as replacements for the 75s until practically the whole regiment was 76mm equipped.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 9:41 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted Facts

Oddly enough you dont see very many pictures at all (at least that I have seen) of British Sherman 76s... Lots of 75s & Fireflies, but I cant remember any pictures of 76s in British colors...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Al_Bowie
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 34

PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:03 pm
Post subject: Distorted Facts

I love the wonderful thoughtless generalisations that such threads dredge up.
Particularly the one about a Panther being worth Four or Five Shermans. This gross generalisation is so wrong in the context of any rational discussion as to be laughable.
Consider this:
If those figures were true then the amount of Shermans deployed to the NWE theatre must have been greater than the actual number. Whilst a Panther in Defence (And I stress Defence - usually ambush) could take a number of Shermans to destoy it the truth also holds true for the Sherman as the battles at the closing of the Falaise pocket indicate and the early Cobra battles where the odds were reversed with up to 12 panthers being KO'd by A troop of Shermans in Defensive position.
Anyone who studies warfare will understand that the defender on prepared ground of his choosing holds all the trumps. The oncoming enemy may lose two or three tanks before even locating his assailant (as Michael Wittman found to his peril). This does not make it a better AFV by any stretch of the imagination. The other part to this is that the five vehicles lost whilst "stalking" the assailant may not all be attributed to the Assailant but its infantry screen or mutually supporting AT or AFV.
THe Panther was a mechanical basket case and was extremely unreliable. The Sherman on the other hand just kept going as wass evidenced in the Normandy breakouts by both US and Brit/Cwealth/Polish forces. The Brits were clocking up huge distances of road march which is extremely taxing on an armoured vehicle and still managed to keep it up. The much vaunted Panther and Tiger would have suffered up to 80% mechanical loss if they attempted the same thing.
The Sherman was an excellent product for the time and like the equally excellent T34 grew to meet the threat. The HVAP 76 mm Shermans with HVAP were a pretty good match for the Panther and even Tiger an could engage these at good battle ranges.
The ability to produce the Sherman easily and in Huge numbers was a very decisive factor and if you did an analysis based on cost effectiveness I know that the Panther would not win.

The other factor overlooked in most of these arguments is the quality of the German Tank crews who had vast experience at both offensive and defensive operations by the time Normandy occured. Most of the US and Brit Formations were rank amatueurs at this in comparison. The integrated all arms philoshphy of the Germans also added to this.

With the exception of the T34 no other ww2 vehicle has had such a career or was so adaptable as to still be going with such success at the end of the War. If the Germans had abandoned the Panther and tiger and concentrated on upgrading the Pz IV family then the numbers they would have had avail and the reliability these proven designs had would have offered more vehicles and some of the results of history may have varied.

Logistics is the lynch pin of any camapign and the ability to support one major type of tank lowers the logisic burden thereby allow your logisic chain to function at its max efficiency. Diluting your logistics across a diverse range of vehicle types reduces your logistic efficiency severly hampering your ability to conduct mobile operations.

The Sherman is a much maligned and denigrated vehicle but to misquote a cartoon of the time "It got their the fastest with the mostest" and did the job asked of it. If some decisions such as arming a percentage of Shermans with the 17pdr in both US and Brit service had been taken earlier along with the introduction of the 76 armed HVSS shermans then it would have had a lot more success but hindsight is onl avail after the fact.

Cheers
Al Bowie
Dedicated Shermaholic
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:46 pm
Post subject: Re: Distorted Facts

- Al_Bowie
I love the wonderful thoughtless generalisations that such threads dredge up.
Particularly the one about a Panther being worth Four or Five Shermans. This gross generalisation is so wrong in the context of any rational discussion as to be laughable.
Consider this:
If those figures were true then the amount of Shermans deployed to the NWE theatre must have been greater than the actual number. Whilst a Panther in Defence (And I stress Defence - usually ambush) could take a number of Shermans to destoy it the truth also holds true for the Sherman as the battles at the closing of the Falaise pocket indicate and the early Cobra battles where the odds were reversed with up to 12 panthers being KO'd by A troop of Shermans in Defensive position.
Anyone who studies warfare will understand that the defender on prepared ground of his choosing holds all the trumps. The oncoming enemy may lose two or three tanks before even locating his assailant (as Michael Wittman found to his peril). This does not make it a better AFV by any stretch of the imagination. The other part to this is that the five vehicles lost whilst "stalking" the assailant may not all be attributed to the Assailant but its infantry screen or mutually supporting AT or AFV.


I'll admit a bit more thorough research is needed into WWII kill ratios. However, even if the generalization/anecdote its true (which I havent seen any contest with actual data), its likely not the case that there would have had to have been more Shermans than there were. It simply would mean that of Sherman vs Panther/Tiger engagements, that was the kill ratio, keeping in mind that such engagements would be a subset of all engagements that took place. I'm sure there were plenty of Panthers & Tigers that were not destroyed by Shermans, or even tanks. Therefore they dont contribute to the kill ratio. Similarly, not all Shermans faced Panthers & Tigers, so any number of Shermans would not contribute to the kill ratio either...

If someone could point me in the direction of any sort of accumulation of WWII tank kill ratio data I'd appreciate it.


THe Panther was a mechanical basket case and was extremely unreliable. The Sherman on the other hand just kept going as wass evidenced in the Normandy breakouts by both US and Brit/Cwealth/Polish forces. The Brits were clocking up huge distances of road march which is extremely taxing on an armoured vehicle and still managed to keep it up. The much vaunted Panther and Tiger would have suffered up to 80% mechanical loss if they attempted the same thing.


Granted, although I'd probably only describe the initial Panthers as true "basketcases." Keep in mind the Panther was good enough to have been kept in use by the French army until the early 1950s; and were also prized by Soviet crews, so much that they impressed Germany personnel to keep them going...


The Sherman was an excellent product for the time and like the equally excellent T34 grew to meet the threat. The HVAP 76 mm Shermans with HVAP were a pretty good match for the Panther and even Tiger an could engage these at good battle ranges.


While I think the Sherman was a great & venerable tank, I wouldnt argue it grew as much as the T-34, at least during WWII. The Soviets upgraded the T-34 with the 85mm gun during the war, while it took the French and Israelis to upgrade the Sherman with similar weapons post-war...


The ability to produce the Sherman easily and in Huge numbers was a very decisive factor and if you did an analysis based on cost effectiveness I know that the Panther would not win.


I wouldnt argue that the US should have producted Panthers instead of Shermans, but that a cost-effective heavier tank could have been fielded (likely by Normandy if they acted quickly enough & with foresight) as a complement to Sherman and would have been a good use of "limited" shipping.


With the exception of the T34 no other ww2 vehicle has had such a career or was so adaptable as to still be going with such success at the end of the War. If the Germans had abandoned the Panther and tiger and concentrated on upgrading the Pz IV family then the numbers they would have had avail and the reliability these proven designs had would have offered more vehicles and some of the results of history may have varied.


Part of the success & adaptability of the T-34 and Sherman is due to the fact that the US & USSR won WWII, leading to several generations of improvements afterwards. If the Germans had won (thank god not!), I have no doubt we would have seen 88mm armed Panthers and quite possibly even eventually 105mm armed Panthers in the postwar years. I'm not so sure (especially taking the French experience) that the Tiger or Tiger II would have had the same longevity...


The Sherman is a much maligned and denigrated vehicle but to misquote a cartoon of the time "It got their the fastest with the mostest" and did the job asked of it. If some decisions such as arming a percentage of Shermans with the 17pdr in both US and Brit service had been taken earlier along with the introduction of the 76 armed HVSS shermans then it would have had a lot more success but hindsight is onl avail after the fact.


Well that at least I agree with!

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:03 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted Facts

I don't have data at hand but I'm not sure there was much difference between the 85mm in the T34 and the 76mm in the Sherman. Both were moderate upgrades from the original gun but neither was the very high velocity gun that the 17pdr or 75L70 of the Panther were. I'm not sure the French post war experience with the Panther proves or disproves the tanks reliability. It wasa peacetime army with peacetime priorities. I doubt they were run hard at all.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:20 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted Facts

- bsmart
I don't have data at hand but I'm not sure there was much difference between the 85mm in the T34 and the 76mm in the Sherman. Both were moderate upgrades from the original gun but neither was the very high velocity gun that the 17pdr or 75L70 of the Panther were.


I stand corrected, it appears the 76mm HVAP had somewhat to much better penetration than the Soviet 85mm gun.

Tony Williams gave the following values on another board for penetration at 1,000 yards, striking at 30 degrees from the optimum:
forum.axishistory.com/...41edd627bf

76mm: 89mm (134mm with HVAP ammo)
17 pdr: 118mm (170mm with APDS ammo)
85mm: 84mm

The following also gives penetration values for the Sherman 76 & T-34/85 against the Tiger I:
www.fprado.com/armorsite/tiger1.htm

Neil


Last edited by Neil_Baumgardner on Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:23 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:22 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F

- Neil_Baumgardner
Oddly enough you dont see very many pictures at all (at least that I have seen) of British Sherman 76s... Lots of 75s & Fireflies, but I cant remember any pictures of 76s in British colors...

Neil


Just a quick google...




_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:25 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted Facts

Jim, thanks. For whatever reason, I dont remember seeing any pics of British Sherman 76s before... Were there any British Easy Eights?

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:30 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F

- Neil_Baumgardner
Jim, thanks. For whatever reason, I dont remember seeing any pics of British Sherman 76s before...

Neil


I think there must have been quite a few in Italy - strangely enough not many fireflies... must have been because of the 76mm shermans.



I hadn't realised that the british used Chaffee's during the war till I was going through the regimental photo albums once and spotted that the 9th Lancers had them in the recce troop during early 1945.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 12:28 am
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F

- JimWeb
- Neil_Baumgardner
Jim, thanks. For whatever reason, I dont remember seeing any pics of British Sherman 76s before...

Neil


I think there must have been quite a few in Italy - strangely enough not many fireflies... must have been because of the 76mm shermans.


See - even the British thought the 76mm Sherman was equivalent to a Firefly!! Laughing Laughing Laughing

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Al_Bowie
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 34

PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 1:27 am
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F

British use of the 76 Sherman.
The British were supplied with a great number of 76 M4A1 VVSS Shermans but mainly used them in Italy. They were used by 2 RTR and the South African 6 AD there. One of the Shots above is a C Sqn 2 RTR vehicle. Interestingly the Brits put a Firefly in each troop of 2 RTR and had a 4 veh tp consisting of 2 76 and 2 Fireflies by wars end. The Brits decided not to employ the 76 Sherman in NWE and passed the vehicles to the Polish who used them in Holland / Germany. They also retained their Fireflies in each tp.
There is anecdotal evidence to indicate that Guards AD got some 76's by wars end.
The Brits were going to acquire the M4A2 76 HVSS and got about 9 of these for trials by wars end. This is the variant the Canadians settled on post war although they took A3's to Korea from US stock to ease the logistical burden.
The only other HVSS vehicle the Brits got was the M4 105 in very ltd numbers in Italy (most went to the Poles).

BTW the point I made about numbers does not indicate that the Panther killed 5 shermans for itself being killed. these would have been killed by a variety of threats such as infantry AT, AT and mutually supporting tanks. I notice you completely overlook the fact that the Panthers were fighting in sited defence giving them a three to one theoretical advantage to start with. If you analyse the Normandy / Falaise and cobra period battles where the Germans were forced to counterattack against vehicles in defensive position the ratios are about 3 to one in favourr of the Sherman highlighting the fact that it is the situation more than the vehicle that accts for the discrepency.

My comments regarding the longevity if you re read them are WW2 related and NOT post war although the Sherman did continue for a long period post war.
THe French used the Panthers ONLY until the US MAP could provide significant amounts of 76 Shermans and a ltd amount of Pershings. If you can get hold of the Shrivenam Report on the Panther from the ones the Brits trialled you will see its reputation far exceeds its capabilities and the Late Panther was as equal a basket case reliability wise as the early ones. Its breakdown rate was lower but it was still extremely high. The only thing the Brits liked about the Panther was the Gun and Optics. The French liked the Gun also and developed it post war. The guns in the M50 and M51 Israeli Shermans are direct descendants of the Panthers excellent 75.
Cheers
Al
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:12 am
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F

- bsmart
I'm not sure the French post war experience with the Panther proves or disproves the tanks reliability. It wasa peacetime army with peacetime priorities. I doubt they were run hard at all.


Personnally, I think that the French army had Panthers because it had nothing better, and was not allowed to produce its own tanks in late 40's. When you look at the uniforms of the French Expeditionary Corps in Indochina, you will see american, british, german, french equipement from WW1 and WW2, and even local or "field" made equipement. We didn't have a standard uniform. (and even now you will find in some French Army units, WW1 and WW2 equipment that are kept in stock, just in case..) That's typically a French problem that we still face today : NOT ENOUGH MONEY !!! and not enough spare parts to repair our vehicles. I have heard that 60% of our planes can't fly because of the lack of spare parts..
So I really think that the French army would not have used Panther tanks in the 50's if they had the choice..

Cheers from France

Pierre-Olivier
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
LeeW
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 61

PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:04 am
Post subject: Re: Distorted Facts

- Neil_Baumgardner
...
While I think the Sherman was a great & venerable tank, I wouldnt argue it grew as much as the T-34, at least during WWII. The Soviets upgraded the T-34 with the 85mm gun during the war, while it took the French and Israelis to upgrade the Sherman with similar weapons post-war...

Well the US did have 105mm armed Shermans in WWII. The T-34 also had a lot more room for improvement. The T-34 76 didn't have a radio for the most part, lousey ergonomics, too small a turret, etc and the Soviet 76mm gun was inferior to the US 75 as you noticed the Soviet 85 was about the equivalant of the US 76 as far as AP performance goes but I think it's HE performance wasn't as good.


....
Part of the success & adaptability of the T-34 and Sherman is due to the fact that the US & USSR won WWII, leading to several generations of improvements afterwards. If the Germans had won (thank god not!), I have no doubt we would have seen 88mm armed Panthers and quite possibly even eventually 105mm armed Panthers in the postwar years. I'm not so sure (especially taking the French experience) that the Tiger or Tiger II would have had the same longevity...


Neither the US nor the Soviets really improved the M-4 or T-34 after the war. I'm not aware of many upgrades for the T-34 at all. The Sherman tended to be upgraded by third parties (Isreal, France, etc)
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:37 am
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F

- Al_Bowie

BTW the point I made about numbers does not indicate that the Panther killed 5 shermans for itself being killed. these would have been killed by a variety of threats such as infantry AT, AT and mutually supporting tanks. I notice you completely overlook the fact that the Panthers were fighting in sited defence giving them a three to one theoretical advantage to start with. If you analyse the Normandy / Falaise and cobra period battles where the Germans were forced to counterattack against vehicles in defensive position the ratios are about 3 to one in favourr of the Sherman highlighting the fact that it is the situation more than the vehicle that accts for the discrepency.


The 3-1 defense advantage rule is a rule of hand that dates back to Clausewitz, which can be adjusted to the particulars of any situation and may or may not have any validity. I will grant defense probably does have advantage, but whether its 2-1, 3-1, etc can vary... OTOH, there certainly have been many thinkers & generals, Patton may have been one of them, that believed in offensive advantage.


My comments regarding the longevity if you re read them are WW2 related and NOT post war although the Sherman did continue for a long period post war.


Okay, sure... Like I said, I'm not really denying that the Sherman as a very good versatile tank...


THe French used the Panthers ONLY until the US MAP could provide significant amounts of 76 Shermans and a ltd amount of Pershings.


I'm not so sure that is true, they kept them around far longer than was necessary by that measure - I dont think anyone had a want for Shermans in the early 1950s. Even the French 1947 report on the Panther (see 160-161 of Spielberger's Panther & its Variants) isnt exactly glowing. But my point is they respected it enough to keep it in service. I dont think they needed to for any other reason... The Soviets had the same respect for it, but they had plenty of JS-2s & -3s to go around. I believe the French Panthers were replaced by M47s... But I can see this discussion has becomes a tangent - Panther vs the Sherman rather than the utility of a hi-lo mix of heavier tanks to complement US Shermans...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 3 of 4
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum