±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 693
Total: 693
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Home
03: Downloads
04: Community Forums
05: Home
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: Community Forums
10: Home
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Photo Gallery
15: Photo Gallery
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Home
19: Member Screenshots
20: News Archive
21: Home
22: Community Forums
23: Home
24: Community Forums
25: Community Forums
26: Home
27: Home
28: Home
29: Home
30: News Archive
31: Community Forums
32: Search
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Photo Gallery
36: Member Screenshots
37: Member Screenshots
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Home
44: Community Forums
45: News Archive
46: News Archive
47: Home
48: Community Forums
49: Home
50: Photo Gallery
51: Home
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Home
56: Community Forums
57: Photo Gallery
58: Community Forums
59: Community Forums
60: Member Screenshots
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Member Screenshots
65: Community Forums
66: Your Account
67: Home
68: Community Forums
69: Member Screenshots
70: Community Forums
71: Home
72: Downloads
73: Photo Gallery
74: Downloads
75: Member Screenshots
76: Photo Gallery
77: Home
78: Community Forums
79: Photo Gallery
80: Community Forums
81: Downloads
82: Community Forums
83: Home
84: Community Forums
85: Member Screenshots
86: Photo Gallery
87: Home
88: Photo Gallery
89: Home
90: Community Forums
91: Home
92: News Archive
93: Statistics
94: Home
95: Community Forums
96: Member Screenshots
97: Member Screenshots
98: Photo Gallery
99: Home
100: Community Forums
101: Member Screenshots
102: Home
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Member Screenshots
107: Member Screenshots
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Photo Gallery
113: Photo Gallery
114: Community Forums
115: Member Screenshots
116: Member Screenshots
117: Community Forums
118: Member Screenshots
119: Community Forums
120: Community Forums
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Community Forums
124: Community Forums
125: News Archive
126: Member Screenshots
127: Member Screenshots
128: Member Screenshots
129: Member Screenshots
130: Community Forums
131: Member Screenshots
132: Community Forums
133: Downloads
134: Home
135: Home
136: Community Forums
137: Photo Gallery
138: Downloads
139: Photo Gallery
140: Community Forums
141: Photo Gallery
142: News Archive
143: Community Forums
144: Member Screenshots
145: Member Screenshots
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Photo Gallery
149: Member Screenshots
150: Home
151: Photo Gallery
152: Member Screenshots
153: Community Forums
154: Member Screenshots
155: Community Forums
156: Downloads
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: Member Screenshots
165: Community Forums
166: News
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Member Screenshots
171: Community Forums
172: Home
173: Downloads
174: Community Forums
175: Community Forums
176: News Archive
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Member Screenshots
180: Downloads
181: Community Forums
182: Member Screenshots
183: Member Screenshots
184: Member Screenshots
185: Community Forums
186: Member Screenshots
187: Member Screenshots
188: Member Screenshots
189: Member Screenshots
190: Community Forums
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Member Screenshots
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Photo Gallery
203: Home
204: Community Forums
205: Photo Gallery
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Member Screenshots
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Member Screenshots
213: Community Forums
214: Photo Gallery
215: Member Screenshots
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Photo Gallery
222: Community Forums
223: Community Forums
224: Member Screenshots
225: News Archive
226: Member Screenshots
227: Community Forums
228: Home
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Photo Gallery
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: News Archive
239: Community Forums
240: Member Screenshots
241: Community Forums
242: Member Screenshots
243: Community Forums
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: Downloads
247: Photo Gallery
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Member Screenshots
251: Photo Gallery
252: Member Screenshots
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: Community Forums
256: Community Forums
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: News
263: Home
264: Community Forums
265: Photo Gallery
266: Home
267: Community Forums
268: Downloads
269: Home
270: Home
271: Home
272: Community Forums
273: Community Forums
274: Photo Gallery
275: News Archive
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: Home
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Downloads
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Downloads
287: Community Forums
288: Member Screenshots
289: Community Forums
290: Home
291: Home
292: Community Forums
293: Member Screenshots
294: Search
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: Home
298: Member Screenshots
299: Community Forums
300: Community Forums
301: News Archive
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Community Forums
307: Home
308: Community Forums
309: Community Forums
310: Downloads
311: Community Forums
312: Statistics
313: News Archive
314: Community Forums
315: Community Forums
316: Member Screenshots
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Photo Gallery
321: Home
322: Home
323: News
324: Community Forums
325: Downloads
326: Member Screenshots
327: Home
328: News
329: Downloads
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: Community Forums
333: Downloads
334: Member Screenshots
335: Member Screenshots
336: Community Forums
337: Member Screenshots
338: Community Forums
339: News Archive
340: Downloads
341: Community Forums
342: Member Screenshots
343: Member Screenshots
344: Home
345: Community Forums
346: Member Screenshots
347: Community Forums
348: Photo Gallery
349: Home
350: Home
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Home
354: Member Screenshots
355: News Archive
356: Member Screenshots
357: Community Forums
358: Community Forums
359: Community Forums
360: Community Forums
361: Community Forums
362: Community Forums
363: Downloads
364: Community Forums
365: Community Forums
366: Community Forums
367: Downloads
368: Community Forums
369: Home
370: Member Screenshots
371: Community Forums
372: Contact
373: Member Screenshots
374: Community Forums
375: Community Forums
376: Community Forums
377: Home
378: Downloads
379: Photo Gallery
380: Member Screenshots
381: Downloads
382: Member Screenshots
383: Community Forums
384: Member Screenshots
385: Member Screenshots
386: Community Forums
387: Member Screenshots
388: Member Screenshots
389: Community Forums
390: News Archive
391: Home
392: Home
393: Home
394: Community Forums
395: Member Screenshots
396: Home
397: Community Forums
398: Member Screenshots
399: Community Forums
400: Photo Gallery
401: Community Forums
402: Home
403: Community Forums
404: Member Screenshots
405: Photo Gallery
406: Community Forums
407: News Archive
408: Community Forums
409: Community Forums
410: Community Forums
411: Home
412: Community Forums
413: Photo Gallery
414: Community Forums
415: Home
416: Member Screenshots
417: Member Screenshots
418: Community Forums
419: Home
420: Home
421: Community Forums
422: Community Forums
423: Community Forums
424: Community Forums
425: Downloads
426: Community Forums
427: Community Forums
428: Search
429: Home
430: Community Forums
431: Downloads
432: Member Screenshots
433: Member Screenshots
434: Photo Gallery
435: Community Forums
436: Home
437: Community Forums
438: Community Forums
439: Home
440: Community Forums
441: Community Forums
442: News Archive
443: Member Screenshots
444: Member Screenshots
445: Community Forums
446: Community Forums
447: News
448: Community Forums
449: Member Screenshots
450: Community Forums
451: Community Forums
452: Community Forums
453: Community Forums
454: Member Screenshots
455: Community Forums
456: Photo Gallery
457: Community Forums
458: Member Screenshots
459: Community Forums
460: Member Screenshots
461: Member Screenshots
462: Community Forums
463: Community Forums
464: Member Screenshots
465: Community Forums
466: Photo Gallery
467: Photo Gallery
468: Community Forums
469: Community Forums
470: Home
471: Community Forums
472: Community Forums
473: Community Forums
474: Photo Gallery
475: Community Forums
476: Community Forums
477: Community Forums
478: Community Forums
479: Downloads
480: Community Forums
481: Community Forums
482: Community Forums
483: News Archive
484: Community Forums
485: Member Screenshots
486: Home
487: Photo Gallery
488: Member Screenshots
489: Community Forums
490: News Archive
491: Community Forums
492: Community Forums
493: Community Forums
494: Community Forums
495: Member Screenshots
496: Community Forums
497: Community Forums
498: Community Forums
499: Community Forums
500: Photo Gallery
501: Community Forums
502: Downloads
503: Community Forums
504: Community Forums
505: Photo Gallery
506: Photo Gallery
507: Community Forums
508: Member Screenshots
509: Community Forums
510: Member Screenshots
511: Photo Gallery
512: Home
513: Statistics
514: Photo Gallery
515: Member Screenshots
516: Community Forums
517: Member Screenshots
518: Community Forums
519: Community Forums
520: Community Forums
521: Community Forums
522: Community Forums
523: Community Forums
524: Community Forums
525: Community Forums
526: Member Screenshots
527: Community Forums
528: Community Forums
529: Member Screenshots
530: Community Forums
531: Member Screenshots
532: Member Screenshots
533: Community Forums
534: Community Forums
535: Member Screenshots
536: Community Forums
537: Member Screenshots
538: Your Account
539: Downloads
540: Community Forums
541: Photo Gallery
542: Home
543: Community Forums
544: Home
545: Community Forums
546: Photo Gallery
547: Community Forums
548: Downloads
549: Member Screenshots
550: Community Forums
551: Community Forums
552: Community Forums
553: Member Screenshots
554: Community Forums
555: News Archive
556: Community Forums
557: Community Forums
558: Community Forums
559: Community Forums
560: Community Forums
561: Member Screenshots
562: Member Screenshots
563: Community Forums
564: Community Forums
565: Member Screenshots
566: Community Forums
567: Community Forums
568: Member Screenshots
569: Community Forums
570: Community Forums
571: Community Forums
572: Member Screenshots
573: Member Screenshots
574: Downloads
575: Home
576: Member Screenshots
577: Member Screenshots
578: Home
579: Downloads
580: Home
581: Member Screenshots
582: Home
583: Community Forums
584: Community Forums
585: Photo Gallery
586: Downloads
587: Home
588: Member Screenshots
589: Community Forums
590: Community Forums
591: Photo Gallery
592: Home
593: Community Forums
594: Member Screenshots
595: Downloads
596: Community Forums
597: Photo Gallery
598: Member Screenshots
599: Community Forums
600: Member Screenshots
601: News Archive
602: Your Account
603: Home
604: Downloads
605: Home
606: LinkToUs
607: Community Forums
608: Home
609: Community Forums
610: Home
611: Community Forums
612: Home
613: Photo Gallery
614: Member Screenshots
615: Community Forums
616: Community Forums
617: Downloads
618: Photo Gallery
619: News Archive
620: Community Forums
621: Community Forums
622: Home
623: Member Screenshots
624: Member Screenshots
625: Community Forums
626: Community Forums
627: Home
628: Photo Gallery
629: Home
630: Community Forums
631: Search
632: Community Forums
633: Member Screenshots
634: Community Forums
635: Member Screenshots
636: Community Forums
637: Home
638: Home
639: Community Forums
640: Home
641: Home
642: Home
643: Community Forums
644: News Archive
645: Member Screenshots
646: Community Forums
647: Member Screenshots
648: Photo Gallery
649: Community Forums
650: Community Forums
651: Community Forums
652: Member Screenshots
653: Photo Gallery
654: Home
655: Community Forums
656: Downloads
657: Home
658: Community Forums
659: Community Forums
660: Community Forums
661: Community Forums
662: Community Forums
663: Home
664: Home
665: Photo Gallery
666: Home
667: Community Forums
668: Community Forums
669: Community Forums
670: Tell a Friend
671: Downloads
672: Home
673: Downloads
674: Community Forums
675: Community Forums
676: Photo Gallery
677: Community Forums
678: Community Forums
679: Community Forums
680: Community Forums
681: Community Forums
682: Downloads
683: Photo Gallery
684: Home
685: Community Forums
686: Community Forums
687: Home
688: Community Forums
689: Community Forums
690: Community Forums
691: Community Forums
692: Home
693: Downloads

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted Facts
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 8:06 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F

- Skeet

This same vet used to talk about the German 88's. A lot of what he spoke about seemed to indicate they could have been 88's. But a lot of what he said made me wonder how (why?) the German's could be using 88's like that, i.e. indirect fire into camps/parks on reverse slopes. I posted that question a while back, and the consenus was that lot's of WWII vets from the ETO referred to all German artillery as 88's.


In noticed that the German combat diaries I've seen all indicate that the 88 was frequently used in the indirect fire role. I recall specifically that this was so in North Africa in particular. So it's possible for indirect fire to have come from 88's. That said, I agree that Allied GI's had a tendency to call any incoming "88 fire".

C

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 9:05 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F


I don't know of any 76mm gun Shermans being issued to British units (Like the GAA engined M4A3 the U.S. tended to keep the 76mm Shermans for themselves, but 76mm gunned M4A2s were sent to the Soviets)


Yeah those miserly yanks only sold us 1,330 M4A1 w/76mm aka Sherman IIA and an unknown number of M4A3 w/76mm aka Sherman IVA. I beleive they went mostly to Italy. My units regimental history speaks of receiving them as replacements for the 75s until practically the whole regiment was 76mm equipped.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 9:41 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted Facts

Oddly enough you dont see very many pictures at all (at least that I have seen) of British Sherman 76s... Lots of 75s & Fireflies, but I cant remember any pictures of 76s in British colors...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Al_Bowie
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 34

PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:03 pm
Post subject: Distorted Facts

I love the wonderful thoughtless generalisations that such threads dredge up.
Particularly the one about a Panther being worth Four or Five Shermans. This gross generalisation is so wrong in the context of any rational discussion as to be laughable.
Consider this:
If those figures were true then the amount of Shermans deployed to the NWE theatre must have been greater than the actual number. Whilst a Panther in Defence (And I stress Defence - usually ambush) could take a number of Shermans to destoy it the truth also holds true for the Sherman as the battles at the closing of the Falaise pocket indicate and the early Cobra battles where the odds were reversed with up to 12 panthers being KO'd by A troop of Shermans in Defensive position.
Anyone who studies warfare will understand that the defender on prepared ground of his choosing holds all the trumps. The oncoming enemy may lose two or three tanks before even locating his assailant (as Michael Wittman found to his peril). This does not make it a better AFV by any stretch of the imagination. The other part to this is that the five vehicles lost whilst "stalking" the assailant may not all be attributed to the Assailant but its infantry screen or mutually supporting AT or AFV.
THe Panther was a mechanical basket case and was extremely unreliable. The Sherman on the other hand just kept going as wass evidenced in the Normandy breakouts by both US and Brit/Cwealth/Polish forces. The Brits were clocking up huge distances of road march which is extremely taxing on an armoured vehicle and still managed to keep it up. The much vaunted Panther and Tiger would have suffered up to 80% mechanical loss if they attempted the same thing.
The Sherman was an excellent product for the time and like the equally excellent T34 grew to meet the threat. The HVAP 76 mm Shermans with HVAP were a pretty good match for the Panther and even Tiger an could engage these at good battle ranges.
The ability to produce the Sherman easily and in Huge numbers was a very decisive factor and if you did an analysis based on cost effectiveness I know that the Panther would not win.

The other factor overlooked in most of these arguments is the quality of the German Tank crews who had vast experience at both offensive and defensive operations by the time Normandy occured. Most of the US and Brit Formations were rank amatueurs at this in comparison. The integrated all arms philoshphy of the Germans also added to this.

With the exception of the T34 no other ww2 vehicle has had such a career or was so adaptable as to still be going with such success at the end of the War. If the Germans had abandoned the Panther and tiger and concentrated on upgrading the Pz IV family then the numbers they would have had avail and the reliability these proven designs had would have offered more vehicles and some of the results of history may have varied.

Logistics is the lynch pin of any camapign and the ability to support one major type of tank lowers the logisic burden thereby allow your logisic chain to function at its max efficiency. Diluting your logistics across a diverse range of vehicle types reduces your logistic efficiency severly hampering your ability to conduct mobile operations.

The Sherman is a much maligned and denigrated vehicle but to misquote a cartoon of the time "It got their the fastest with the mostest" and did the job asked of it. If some decisions such as arming a percentage of Shermans with the 17pdr in both US and Brit service had been taken earlier along with the introduction of the 76 armed HVSS shermans then it would have had a lot more success but hindsight is onl avail after the fact.

Cheers
Al Bowie
Dedicated Shermaholic
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:46 pm
Post subject: Re: Distorted Facts

- Al_Bowie
I love the wonderful thoughtless generalisations that such threads dredge up.
Particularly the one about a Panther being worth Four or Five Shermans. This gross generalisation is so wrong in the context of any rational discussion as to be laughable.
Consider this:
If those figures were true then the amount of Shermans deployed to the NWE theatre must have been greater than the actual number. Whilst a Panther in Defence (And I stress Defence - usually ambush) could take a number of Shermans to destoy it the truth also holds true for the Sherman as the battles at the closing of the Falaise pocket indicate and the early Cobra battles where the odds were reversed with up to 12 panthers being KO'd by A troop of Shermans in Defensive position.
Anyone who studies warfare will understand that the defender on prepared ground of his choosing holds all the trumps. The oncoming enemy may lose two or three tanks before even locating his assailant (as Michael Wittman found to his peril). This does not make it a better AFV by any stretch of the imagination. The other part to this is that the five vehicles lost whilst "stalking" the assailant may not all be attributed to the Assailant but its infantry screen or mutually supporting AT or AFV.


I'll admit a bit more thorough research is needed into WWII kill ratios. However, even if the generalization/anecdote its true (which I havent seen any contest with actual data), its likely not the case that there would have had to have been more Shermans than there were. It simply would mean that of Sherman vs Panther/Tiger engagements, that was the kill ratio, keeping in mind that such engagements would be a subset of all engagements that took place. I'm sure there were plenty of Panthers & Tigers that were not destroyed by Shermans, or even tanks. Therefore they dont contribute to the kill ratio. Similarly, not all Shermans faced Panthers & Tigers, so any number of Shermans would not contribute to the kill ratio either...

If someone could point me in the direction of any sort of accumulation of WWII tank kill ratio data I'd appreciate it.


THe Panther was a mechanical basket case and was extremely unreliable. The Sherman on the other hand just kept going as wass evidenced in the Normandy breakouts by both US and Brit/Cwealth/Polish forces. The Brits were clocking up huge distances of road march which is extremely taxing on an armoured vehicle and still managed to keep it up. The much vaunted Panther and Tiger would have suffered up to 80% mechanical loss if they attempted the same thing.


Granted, although I'd probably only describe the initial Panthers as true "basketcases." Keep in mind the Panther was good enough to have been kept in use by the French army until the early 1950s; and were also prized by Soviet crews, so much that they impressed Germany personnel to keep them going...


The Sherman was an excellent product for the time and like the equally excellent T34 grew to meet the threat. The HVAP 76 mm Shermans with HVAP were a pretty good match for the Panther and even Tiger an could engage these at good battle ranges.


While I think the Sherman was a great & venerable tank, I wouldnt argue it grew as much as the T-34, at least during WWII. The Soviets upgraded the T-34 with the 85mm gun during the war, while it took the French and Israelis to upgrade the Sherman with similar weapons post-war...


The ability to produce the Sherman easily and in Huge numbers was a very decisive factor and if you did an analysis based on cost effectiveness I know that the Panther would not win.


I wouldnt argue that the US should have producted Panthers instead of Shermans, but that a cost-effective heavier tank could have been fielded (likely by Normandy if they acted quickly enough & with foresight) as a complement to Sherman and would have been a good use of "limited" shipping.


With the exception of the T34 no other ww2 vehicle has had such a career or was so adaptable as to still be going with such success at the end of the War. If the Germans had abandoned the Panther and tiger and concentrated on upgrading the Pz IV family then the numbers they would have had avail and the reliability these proven designs had would have offered more vehicles and some of the results of history may have varied.


Part of the success & adaptability of the T-34 and Sherman is due to the fact that the US & USSR won WWII, leading to several generations of improvements afterwards. If the Germans had won (thank god not!), I have no doubt we would have seen 88mm armed Panthers and quite possibly even eventually 105mm armed Panthers in the postwar years. I'm not so sure (especially taking the French experience) that the Tiger or Tiger II would have had the same longevity...


The Sherman is a much maligned and denigrated vehicle but to misquote a cartoon of the time "It got their the fastest with the mostest" and did the job asked of it. If some decisions such as arming a percentage of Shermans with the 17pdr in both US and Brit service had been taken earlier along with the introduction of the 76 armed HVSS shermans then it would have had a lot more success but hindsight is onl avail after the fact.


Well that at least I agree with!

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:03 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted Facts

I don't have data at hand but I'm not sure there was much difference between the 85mm in the T34 and the 76mm in the Sherman. Both were moderate upgrades from the original gun but neither was the very high velocity gun that the 17pdr or 75L70 of the Panther were. I'm not sure the French post war experience with the Panther proves or disproves the tanks reliability. It wasa peacetime army with peacetime priorities. I doubt they were run hard at all.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:20 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted Facts

- bsmart
I don't have data at hand but I'm not sure there was much difference between the 85mm in the T34 and the 76mm in the Sherman. Both were moderate upgrades from the original gun but neither was the very high velocity gun that the 17pdr or 75L70 of the Panther were.


I stand corrected, it appears the 76mm HVAP had somewhat to much better penetration than the Soviet 85mm gun.

Tony Williams gave the following values on another board for penetration at 1,000 yards, striking at 30 degrees from the optimum:
forum.axishistory.com/...41edd627bf

76mm: 89mm (134mm with HVAP ammo)
17 pdr: 118mm (170mm with APDS ammo)
85mm: 84mm

The following also gives penetration values for the Sherman 76 & T-34/85 against the Tiger I:
www.fprado.com/armorsite/tiger1.htm

Neil


Last edited by Neil_Baumgardner on Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:23 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:22 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F

- Neil_Baumgardner
Oddly enough you dont see very many pictures at all (at least that I have seen) of British Sherman 76s... Lots of 75s & Fireflies, but I cant remember any pictures of 76s in British colors...

Neil


Just a quick google...




_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:25 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted Facts

Jim, thanks. For whatever reason, I dont remember seeing any pics of British Sherman 76s before... Were there any British Easy Eights?

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:30 pm
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F

- Neil_Baumgardner
Jim, thanks. For whatever reason, I dont remember seeing any pics of British Sherman 76s before...

Neil


I think there must have been quite a few in Italy - strangely enough not many fireflies... must have been because of the 76mm shermans.



I hadn't realised that the british used Chaffee's during the war till I was going through the regimental photo albums once and spotted that the 9th Lancers had them in the recce troop during early 1945.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 12:28 am
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F

- JimWeb
- Neil_Baumgardner
Jim, thanks. For whatever reason, I dont remember seeing any pics of British Sherman 76s before...

Neil


I think there must have been quite a few in Italy - strangely enough not many fireflies... must have been because of the 76mm shermans.


See - even the British thought the 76mm Sherman was equivalent to a Firefly!! Laughing Laughing Laughing

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Al_Bowie
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 34

PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 1:27 am
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F

British use of the 76 Sherman.
The British were supplied with a great number of 76 M4A1 VVSS Shermans but mainly used them in Italy. They were used by 2 RTR and the South African 6 AD there. One of the Shots above is a C Sqn 2 RTR vehicle. Interestingly the Brits put a Firefly in each troop of 2 RTR and had a 4 veh tp consisting of 2 76 and 2 Fireflies by wars end. The Brits decided not to employ the 76 Sherman in NWE and passed the vehicles to the Polish who used them in Holland / Germany. They also retained their Fireflies in each tp.
There is anecdotal evidence to indicate that Guards AD got some 76's by wars end.
The Brits were going to acquire the M4A2 76 HVSS and got about 9 of these for trials by wars end. This is the variant the Canadians settled on post war although they took A3's to Korea from US stock to ease the logistical burden.
The only other HVSS vehicle the Brits got was the M4 105 in very ltd numbers in Italy (most went to the Poles).

BTW the point I made about numbers does not indicate that the Panther killed 5 shermans for itself being killed. these would have been killed by a variety of threats such as infantry AT, AT and mutually supporting tanks. I notice you completely overlook the fact that the Panthers were fighting in sited defence giving them a three to one theoretical advantage to start with. If you analyse the Normandy / Falaise and cobra period battles where the Germans were forced to counterattack against vehicles in defensive position the ratios are about 3 to one in favourr of the Sherman highlighting the fact that it is the situation more than the vehicle that accts for the discrepency.

My comments regarding the longevity if you re read them are WW2 related and NOT post war although the Sherman did continue for a long period post war.
THe French used the Panthers ONLY until the US MAP could provide significant amounts of 76 Shermans and a ltd amount of Pershings. If you can get hold of the Shrivenam Report on the Panther from the ones the Brits trialled you will see its reputation far exceeds its capabilities and the Late Panther was as equal a basket case reliability wise as the early ones. Its breakdown rate was lower but it was still extremely high. The only thing the Brits liked about the Panther was the Gun and Optics. The French liked the Gun also and developed it post war. The guns in the M50 and M51 Israeli Shermans are direct descendants of the Panthers excellent 75.
Cheers
Al
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:12 am
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F

- bsmart
I'm not sure the French post war experience with the Panther proves or disproves the tanks reliability. It wasa peacetime army with peacetime priorities. I doubt they were run hard at all.


Personnally, I think that the French army had Panthers because it had nothing better, and was not allowed to produce its own tanks in late 40's. When you look at the uniforms of the French Expeditionary Corps in Indochina, you will see american, british, german, french equipement from WW1 and WW2, and even local or "field" made equipement. We didn't have a standard uniform. (and even now you will find in some French Army units, WW1 and WW2 equipment that are kept in stock, just in case..) That's typically a French problem that we still face today : NOT ENOUGH MONEY !!! and not enough spare parts to repair our vehicles. I have heard that 60% of our planes can't fly because of the lack of spare parts..
So I really think that the French army would not have used Panther tanks in the 50's if they had the choice..

Cheers from France

Pierre-Olivier
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
LeeW
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 61

PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:04 am
Post subject: Re: Distorted Facts

- Neil_Baumgardner
...
While I think the Sherman was a great & venerable tank, I wouldnt argue it grew as much as the T-34, at least during WWII. The Soviets upgraded the T-34 with the 85mm gun during the war, while it took the French and Israelis to upgrade the Sherman with similar weapons post-war...

Well the US did have 105mm armed Shermans in WWII. The T-34 also had a lot more room for improvement. The T-34 76 didn't have a radio for the most part, lousey ergonomics, too small a turret, etc and the Soviet 76mm gun was inferior to the US 75 as you noticed the Soviet 85 was about the equivalant of the US 76 as far as AP performance goes but I think it's HE performance wasn't as good.


....
Part of the success & adaptability of the T-34 and Sherman is due to the fact that the US & USSR won WWII, leading to several generations of improvements afterwards. If the Germans had won (thank god not!), I have no doubt we would have seen 88mm armed Panthers and quite possibly even eventually 105mm armed Panthers in the postwar years. I'm not so sure (especially taking the French experience) that the Tiger or Tiger II would have had the same longevity...


Neither the US nor the Soviets really improved the M-4 or T-34 after the war. I'm not aware of many upgrades for the T-34 at all. The Sherman tended to be upgraded by third parties (Isreal, France, etc)
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:37 am
Post subject: Re: The Sherman Tank, The Good, The Bad, and The Distorted F

- Al_Bowie

BTW the point I made about numbers does not indicate that the Panther killed 5 shermans for itself being killed. these would have been killed by a variety of threats such as infantry AT, AT and mutually supporting tanks. I notice you completely overlook the fact that the Panthers were fighting in sited defence giving them a three to one theoretical advantage to start with. If you analyse the Normandy / Falaise and cobra period battles where the Germans were forced to counterattack against vehicles in defensive position the ratios are about 3 to one in favourr of the Sherman highlighting the fact that it is the situation more than the vehicle that accts for the discrepency.


The 3-1 defense advantage rule is a rule of hand that dates back to Clausewitz, which can be adjusted to the particulars of any situation and may or may not have any validity. I will grant defense probably does have advantage, but whether its 2-1, 3-1, etc can vary... OTOH, there certainly have been many thinkers & generals, Patton may have been one of them, that believed in offensive advantage.


My comments regarding the longevity if you re read them are WW2 related and NOT post war although the Sherman did continue for a long period post war.


Okay, sure... Like I said, I'm not really denying that the Sherman as a very good versatile tank...


THe French used the Panthers ONLY until the US MAP could provide significant amounts of 76 Shermans and a ltd amount of Pershings.


I'm not so sure that is true, they kept them around far longer than was necessary by that measure - I dont think anyone had a want for Shermans in the early 1950s. Even the French 1947 report on the Panther (see 160-161 of Spielberger's Panther & its Variants) isnt exactly glowing. But my point is they respected it enough to keep it in service. I dont think they needed to for any other reason... The Soviets had the same respect for it, but they had plenty of JS-2s & -3s to go around. I believe the French Panthers were replaced by M47s... But I can see this discussion has becomes a tangent - Panther vs the Sherman rather than the utility of a hi-lo mix of heavier tanks to complement US Shermans...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 3 of 4
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum