±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 308
Total: 308
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Home
03: Member Screenshots
04: Community Forums
05: Statistics
06: Statistics
07: Home
08: Member Screenshots
09: Photo Gallery
10: Member Screenshots
11: Member Screenshots
12: Photo Gallery
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Member Screenshots
16: Community Forums
17: Home
18: Your Account
19: Photo Gallery
20: Community Forums
21: Member Screenshots
22: Member Screenshots
23: Photo Gallery
24: Community Forums
25: News Archive
26: Home
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Downloads
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Photo Gallery
36: Photo Gallery
37: Home
38: Photo Gallery
39: Photo Gallery
40: Community Forums
41: Photo Gallery
42: Home
43: Home
44: News Archive
45: Photo Gallery
46: Home
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: Member Screenshots
50: Community Forums
51: Home
52: Member Screenshots
53: Home
54: Photo Gallery
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Home
59: Home
60: Member Screenshots
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Member Screenshots
64: Home
65: Home
66: Community Forums
67: Photo Gallery
68: Photo Gallery
69: Downloads
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Community Forums
73: Member Screenshots
74: Home
75: Home
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Photo Gallery
79: Member Screenshots
80: Photo Gallery
81: Home
82: Community Forums
83: Home
84: Photo Gallery
85: Community Forums
86: Photo Gallery
87: Member Screenshots
88: Photo Gallery
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Downloads
94: Photo Gallery
95: Downloads
96: Home
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Community Forums
100: Member Screenshots
101: Downloads
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Photo Gallery
106: Home
107: Home
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Member Screenshots
111: Supporters
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Photo Gallery
115: Community Forums
116: Home
117: Community Forums
118: Community Forums
119: Your Account
120: Home
121: Home
122: Community Forums
123: Photo Gallery
124: Member Screenshots
125: Community Forums
126: Photo Gallery
127: Photo Gallery
128: Photo Gallery
129: Photo Gallery
130: Downloads
131: Member Screenshots
132: Community Forums
133: Home
134: Community Forums
135: Home
136: Member Screenshots
137: Home
138: Home
139: Home
140: Photo Gallery
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Member Screenshots
145: Photo Gallery
146: Home
147: Photo Gallery
148: Community Forums
149: Downloads
150: Member Screenshots
151: Home
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Photo Gallery
155: Downloads
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Home
159: Member Screenshots
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: News
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: Member Screenshots
166: Member Screenshots
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: News Archive
171: Community Forums
172: Your Account
173: Downloads
174: Home
175: Community Forums
176: Home
177: Community Forums
178: Downloads
179: Member Screenshots
180: Community Forums
181: Your Account
182: Member Screenshots
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Photo Gallery
186: Downloads
187: Photo Gallery
188: Member Screenshots
189: Member Screenshots
190: Photo Gallery
191: Home
192: Home
193: Member Screenshots
194: Community Forums
195: Contact
196: Community Forums
197: Statistics
198: Member Screenshots
199: News Archive
200: Community Forums
201: Photo Gallery
202: Home
203: Your Account
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: News Archive
207: Community Forums
208: Home
209: Community Forums
210: Downloads
211: Member Screenshots
212: Community Forums
213: Home
214: Home
215: Photo Gallery
216: Community Forums
217: Downloads
218: Member Screenshots
219: Community Forums
220: Photo Gallery
221: Home
222: Home
223: Community Forums
224: Member Screenshots
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Member Screenshots
228: Photo Gallery
229: Community Forums
230: Home
231: Photo Gallery
232: Your Account
233: Home
234: Photo Gallery
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Home
238: Community Forums
239: Home
240: News Archive
241: Member Screenshots
242: Member Screenshots
243: Downloads
244: Home
245: Community Forums
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Photo Gallery
249: Home
250: Home
251: Home
252: Community Forums
253: Home
254: Photo Gallery
255: Photo Gallery
256: News Archive
257: Home
258: News Archive
259: Home
260: Photo Gallery
261: Community Forums
262: Home
263: News Archive
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Statistics
267: Home
268: Photo Gallery
269: Community Forums
270: Member Screenshots
271: Photo Gallery
272: Home
273: Photo Gallery
274: Photo Gallery
275: Home
276: Statistics
277: Downloads
278: Photo Gallery
279: Photo Gallery
280: Community Forums
281: Home
282: Home
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Photo Gallery
286: Home
287: Home
288: Photo Gallery
289: Downloads
290: Member Screenshots
291: Community Forums
292: Home
293: Member Screenshots
294: Photo Gallery
295: Member Screenshots
296: Home
297: Home
298: Community Forums
299: Community Forums
300: Home
301: Member Screenshots
302: Home
303: Photo Gallery
304: Home
305: News
306: Community Forums
307: Downloads
308: Member Screenshots

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
No More DU?
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 6:52 pm
Post subject: No More DU?

I found this quote in an article at 'The Gun Zone'. It came as quite a surprise! I guess DU was a good idea as long as you didn't have to occupy the territory afterward. Has anyone witnessed this supposed ammo changeover actually taking place?

"Now, the Army has disclosed plans to expand the "green ammo" program to fill all 120mm tank rounds with tungsten, instead of depleted uranium. Depleted-uranium ammunition afforded American ground forces an advantage over their Iraqi targets during the Gulf War. But, since the material is indisputably an environmental hazard, it's soon to be replaced by tungsten, which will give shells a smaller effective range. So a tactical edge is also being thrown out the window along with the depleted uranium... ...Incidentally, as the United States lacks tungsten reserves, it is obliged to purchase the metal from China."
Back to top
View user's profile
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Post subject: Re: No More DU?

Hmmm...color me skeptical, until I hear it officially. I can't see tossing out any advantage just for some perceived environmental benefit, but I've been wrong before. As far as contamination, I don't recall ever hearing any discussion about it while I was there, aside from the basic safety measures of "wash your damn hands, etc.". I don't know of any contamination problems that have come up at all.

Truthfully, I doubt that many DU rounds have been fired since the initial invasion, since it's virtually exclusive purpose is anti-armor. A sabot dart of any material is pretty useless against mud huts, cinderblock buildings, and automobiles. It would make a pretty hole, but not much else.

I'd rate this as an unlikely rumor, without completely discounting the possibility it is true.

C

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:23 pm
Post subject: Re: No More DU?

There was a report awhile back in B.A.R. that spaced armour was proving to be effective against DU rounds it didn't go into specifics but its one of the reasons the UK has already abandoned DU.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:49 pm
Post subject: Re: No More DU?

Once DU penetrates it supposedly shatters and burns. That could 'theoretically' be its achilles heel against properly spaced armor I suppose. Also, aerosolized DU might be a problem for battlefield cleanup and disposal. I vaguely recall a report about a soldier involved in cleanup dying from exposure - but I may be wrong about that. If they're not partiicularly concerned about the outskirts of Bagdhad they may be pretty concerned about accumulated DU at firing ranges over time.
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 2:02 pm
Post subject: Re: No More DU?

- mike_Duplessis
Also, aerosolized DU might be a problem for battlefield cleanup and disposal. I vaguely recall a report about a soldier involved in cleanup dying from exposure - but I may be wrong about that.


At the time of the liberation of kuwait I recall that orders not to climb/approach vehicles knocked out by DU rounds were quite widely distributed so the aerosolized DU must have been a known problem.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 3:19 pm
Post subject: Re: No More DU?

- JimWeb
- mike_Duplessis
Also, aerosolized DU might be a problem for battlefield cleanup and disposal. I vaguely recall a report about a soldier involved in cleanup dying from exposure - but I may be wrong about that.


At the time of the liberation of kuwait I recall that orders not to climb/approach vehicles knocked out by DU rounds were quite widely distributed so the aerosolized DU must have been a known problem.

Cool


There was a long thread about this in the misty past. The primary hazard of DU isn't the direct radiation hazard, as DU is relatively stable and not particularly radioactive. The problem is that Uranium is a heavy metal and behaves as such in the body if it is ingested (mainly by swallowing the dust). The Uranium concentrates in the soft tissues, organs and glands. The effects are uncertain, but concern is twofold: 1. The Uranium may cause systemic problems similar to lead or other heavy metals, and 2. The low level radioactivity, concentrated in soft tissues, may (slightly) increase the chances of some types of cancer.

Physiologically, the effects of uranium ingestion are not really clearly known, but no one wants to take chances with heavy metals. The radiation hazard is very, very low, but anything that mentions "radiation" scares some folks to the point of hysteria. There has been a great deal of effort in the international Green community to find some imminent hazard from the US use of DU, with no appreciable scientifically verifiable results.

It is instructive that the primary action for possible exposure to DU is "keep your hands out of your mouth, and wash your hands/skin with soap and water".

Hope this helps!
C

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:04 pm
Post subject: Re: No More DU?

Another heavy metal you might not want to injest is Arsenic Smile
The populace/press generally tends to confuse and conflate threats. Sure uranium might cause cancer but its more likely to poison you first! Its like confusing global warming with the ozone hole. The both might be from the same source but it's totally different threats.
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum