±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 306
Total: 306
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Home
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: Home
10: Downloads
11: Member Screenshots
12: Home
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Photo Gallery
17: Member Screenshots
18: Home
19: Photo Gallery
20: Community Forums
21: Member Screenshots
22: Home
23: Home
24: Home
25: Photo Gallery
26: Photo Gallery
27: Community Forums
28: Home
29: Home
30: Home
31: Home
32: Home
33: Community Forums
34: Home
35: Photo Gallery
36: Home
37: Statistics
38: Home
39: Home
40: Community Forums
41: Member Screenshots
42: Community Forums
43: Photo Gallery
44: Home
45: Community Forums
46: Community Forums
47: Home
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Home
52: Community Forums
53: Member Screenshots
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Home
57: Home
58: Photo Gallery
59: Home
60: Home
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Photo Gallery
66: Community Forums
67: Photo Gallery
68: Community Forums
69: Photo Gallery
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: News Archive
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Downloads
77: Home
78: Downloads
79: Downloads
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Home
83: Home
84: News Archive
85: Community Forums
86: Photo Gallery
87: Community Forums
88: Home
89: Community Forums
90: Home
91: Home
92: Home
93: Community Forums
94: Home
95: Community Forums
96: Photo Gallery
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: News Archive
100: Downloads
101: Community Forums
102: Home
103: Home
104: Home
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Home
108: Downloads
109: Member Screenshots
110: Home
111: Community Forums
112: Home
113: Downloads
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Member Screenshots
118: News Archive
119: Home
120: Downloads
121: Community Forums
122: Community Forums
123: Home
124: Community Forums
125: Community Forums
126: Home
127: Community Forums
128: Community Forums
129: Home
130: Community Forums
131: News Archive
132: Community Forums
133: Supporters
134: Photo Gallery
135: Community Forums
136: Photo Gallery
137: Photo Gallery
138: Community Forums
139: News
140: News Archive
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: News Archive
144: Community Forums
145: Home
146: Photo Gallery
147: Home
148: Community Forums
149: Downloads
150: News Archive
151: Community Forums
152: Community Forums
153: Home
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Photo Gallery
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Home
164: Home
165: Community Forums
166: Photo Gallery
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Home
172: Home
173: Photo Gallery
174: Home
175: Community Forums
176: Home
177: Downloads
178: Downloads
179: Community Forums
180: Downloads
181: Downloads
182: Downloads
183: Downloads
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Photo Gallery
188: Supporters
189: Community Forums
190: Home
191: Community Forums
192: Downloads
193: Community Forums
194: Home
195: Home
196: Downloads
197: Photo Gallery
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Downloads
201: Community Forums
202: Downloads
203: Downloads
204: Member Screenshots
205: Community Forums
206: Downloads
207: Downloads
208: Home
209: Community Forums
210: Home
211: Home
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Home
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Downloads
222: Community Forums
223: News Archive
224: Home
225: Home
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Downloads
229: Your Account
230: Community Forums
231: Home
232: Home
233: Home
234: Downloads
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: News Archive
239: Member Screenshots
240: Home
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Community Forums
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: Member Screenshots
247: Community Forums
248: Home
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Photo Gallery
252: Home
253: Home
254: News Archive
255: Community Forums
256: Community Forums
257: Community Forums
258: Photo Gallery
259: Home
260: Member Screenshots
261: Home
262: Downloads
263: Home
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Downloads
269: Community Forums
270: Home
271: Home
272: Community Forums
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Home
277: Community Forums
278: Community Forums
279: Home
280: Downloads
281: Community Forums
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Home
285: News Archive
286: Home
287: Community Forums
288: Home
289: Community Forums
290: Home
291: Home
292: Community Forums
293: Photo Gallery
294: Community Forums
295: Photo Gallery
296: Home
297: News Archive
298: Community Forums
299: Photo Gallery
300: Home
301: News Archive
302: Home
303: News Archive
304: Home
305: Photo Gallery
306: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
No More DU?
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 6:52 pm
Post subject: No More DU?

I found this quote in an article at 'The Gun Zone'. It came as quite a surprise! I guess DU was a good idea as long as you didn't have to occupy the territory afterward. Has anyone witnessed this supposed ammo changeover actually taking place?

"Now, the Army has disclosed plans to expand the "green ammo" program to fill all 120mm tank rounds with tungsten, instead of depleted uranium. Depleted-uranium ammunition afforded American ground forces an advantage over their Iraqi targets during the Gulf War. But, since the material is indisputably an environmental hazard, it's soon to be replaced by tungsten, which will give shells a smaller effective range. So a tactical edge is also being thrown out the window along with the depleted uranium... ...Incidentally, as the United States lacks tungsten reserves, it is obliged to purchase the metal from China."
Back to top
View user's profile
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Post subject: Re: No More DU?

Hmmm...color me skeptical, until I hear it officially. I can't see tossing out any advantage just for some perceived environmental benefit, but I've been wrong before. As far as contamination, I don't recall ever hearing any discussion about it while I was there, aside from the basic safety measures of "wash your damn hands, etc.". I don't know of any contamination problems that have come up at all.

Truthfully, I doubt that many DU rounds have been fired since the initial invasion, since it's virtually exclusive purpose is anti-armor. A sabot dart of any material is pretty useless against mud huts, cinderblock buildings, and automobiles. It would make a pretty hole, but not much else.

I'd rate this as an unlikely rumor, without completely discounting the possibility it is true.

C

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:23 pm
Post subject: Re: No More DU?

There was a report awhile back in B.A.R. that spaced armour was proving to be effective against DU rounds it didn't go into specifics but its one of the reasons the UK has already abandoned DU.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:49 pm
Post subject: Re: No More DU?

Once DU penetrates it supposedly shatters and burns. That could 'theoretically' be its achilles heel against properly spaced armor I suppose. Also, aerosolized DU might be a problem for battlefield cleanup and disposal. I vaguely recall a report about a soldier involved in cleanup dying from exposure - but I may be wrong about that. If they're not partiicularly concerned about the outskirts of Bagdhad they may be pretty concerned about accumulated DU at firing ranges over time.
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 2:02 pm
Post subject: Re: No More DU?

- mike_Duplessis
Also, aerosolized DU might be a problem for battlefield cleanup and disposal. I vaguely recall a report about a soldier involved in cleanup dying from exposure - but I may be wrong about that.


At the time of the liberation of kuwait I recall that orders not to climb/approach vehicles knocked out by DU rounds were quite widely distributed so the aerosolized DU must have been a known problem.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
C_Sherman
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 590

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 3:19 pm
Post subject: Re: No More DU?

- JimWeb
- mike_Duplessis
Also, aerosolized DU might be a problem for battlefield cleanup and disposal. I vaguely recall a report about a soldier involved in cleanup dying from exposure - but I may be wrong about that.


At the time of the liberation of kuwait I recall that orders not to climb/approach vehicles knocked out by DU rounds were quite widely distributed so the aerosolized DU must have been a known problem.

Cool


There was a long thread about this in the misty past. The primary hazard of DU isn't the direct radiation hazard, as DU is relatively stable and not particularly radioactive. The problem is that Uranium is a heavy metal and behaves as such in the body if it is ingested (mainly by swallowing the dust). The Uranium concentrates in the soft tissues, organs and glands. The effects are uncertain, but concern is twofold: 1. The Uranium may cause systemic problems similar to lead or other heavy metals, and 2. The low level radioactivity, concentrated in soft tissues, may (slightly) increase the chances of some types of cancer.

Physiologically, the effects of uranium ingestion are not really clearly known, but no one wants to take chances with heavy metals. The radiation hazard is very, very low, but anything that mentions "radiation" scares some folks to the point of hysteria. There has been a great deal of effort in the international Green community to find some imminent hazard from the US use of DU, with no appreciable scientifically verifiable results.

It is instructive that the primary action for possible exposure to DU is "keep your hands out of your mouth, and wash your hands/skin with soap and water".

Hope this helps!
C

_________________
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
-Herm Albright

Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:04 pm
Post subject: Re: No More DU?

Another heavy metal you might not want to injest is Arsenic Smile
The populace/press generally tends to confuse and conflate threats. Sure uranium might cause cancer but its more likely to poison you first! Its like confusing global warming with the ozone hole. The both might be from the same source but it's totally different threats.
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum