±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 246
Total: 246
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Photo Gallery
06: Home
07: News
08: Member Screenshots
09: Home
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: Home
13: Member Screenshots
14: LinkToUs
15: Community Forums
16: Downloads
17: Community Forums
18: Member Screenshots
19: Your Account
20: Community Forums
21: Photo Gallery
22: News Archive
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: Photo Gallery
26: Home
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: News Archive
31: Photo Gallery
32: Your Account
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Member Screenshots
36: Home
37: Home
38: Home
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: News
42: Downloads
43: Home
44: Home
45: Downloads
46: Photo Gallery
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: News
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: News Archive
53: News Archive
54: News Archive
55: Home
56: Home
57: Photo Gallery
58: Community Forums
59: Member Screenshots
60: Home
61: Home
62: Downloads
63: News Archive
64: Your Account
65: News
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: News Archive
69: Your Account
70: Member Screenshots
71: Home
72: Home
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Photo Gallery
76: Downloads
77: Home
78: Community Forums
79: News Archive
80: Community Forums
81: News Archive
82: Home
83: News Archive
84: Photo Gallery
85: Community Forums
86: Home
87: Your Account
88: News Archive
89: Community Forums
90: News Archive
91: Community Forums
92: News
93: Home
94: Member Screenshots
95: Community Forums
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Contact
99: Community Forums
100: Home
101: Photo Gallery
102: Community Forums
103: Photo Gallery
104: Downloads
105: Home
106: News Archive
107: Home
108: Member Screenshots
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Photo Gallery
113: Home
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: News Archive
117: Community Forums
118: Home
119: Community Forums
120: Your Account
121: Statistics
122: News Archive
123: Home
124: Community Forums
125: Community Forums
126: Home
127: Downloads
128: Home
129: Photo Gallery
130: News Archive
131: Community Forums
132: Member Screenshots
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: News Archive
137: Downloads
138: Home
139: Member Screenshots
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: News Archive
145: Supporters
146: Home
147: Home
148: Home
149: Community Forums
150: Home
151: News
152: Member Screenshots
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Your Account
156: Statistics
157: Community Forums
158: Downloads
159: Member Screenshots
160: News Archive
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: Home
165: Statistics
166: Home
167: Community Forums
168: Your Account
169: Home
170: Home
171: Community Forums
172: Home
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Home
176: Community Forums
177: Member Screenshots
178: Community Forums
179: Home
180: Community Forums
181: Community Forums
182: Community Forums
183: News Archive
184: Photo Gallery
185: Community Forums
186: News Archive
187: Community Forums
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: Home
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Community Forums
194: Your Account
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Home
198: Photo Gallery
199: Photo Gallery
200: Home
201: Photo Gallery
202: Community Forums
203: Home
204: Community Forums
205: Community Forums
206: Photo Gallery
207: Community Forums
208: Tell a Friend
209: Photo Gallery
210: Community Forums
211: Home
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Member Screenshots
217: News Archive
218: Home
219: Home
220: News Archive
221: Member Screenshots
222: Home
223: Contact
224: Downloads
225: LinkToUs
226: Community Forums
227: LinkToUs
228: Your Account
229: Photo Gallery
230: Home
231: Community Forums
232: Your Account
233: News Archive
234: Statistics
235: LinkToUs
236: News Archive
237: Member Screenshots
238: Your Account
239: Community Forums
240: Downloads
241: News Archive
242: Your Account
243: Member Screenshots
244: News Archive
245: Photo Gallery
246: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
M1028 Canister Round for M1's at Ft Hood...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 1:55 am
Post subject: M1028 Canister Round for M1's at Ft Hood...

Todays Fort Hood Sentinal, (post paper) had an article that says the new M1028 Cannister round was fired for the first time this week at Ft Hood by 2nd Battalion, 5th Cavalry Regt. This round is a 120mm shell, and when fired, sends approximately 1,100, 3/8inch Tungsten steel balls down range. It creates a lethal barrage of pellets that travel at over 1,400 meters per second, OUCH! They compare it to a Claymore mine in its effect. I wonder what took so long to develop something like this? I envision a Mortar round that explodes downward with a smaller size pellet. Useing a proximity fuze it would leave virtually no square foot un-affected.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 2:38 am
Post subject: Re: M1028 Canister Round for M1's at Ft Hood...

Those should give decent penetration against certain targets compared to our old canister round.

You'd have loved "can", Jeff...10,000 finned nails of love per round in a 152mm.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 3:07 am
Post subject: Re: M1028 Canister Round for M1's at Ft Hood...

Remember the "flechettes" I had from a 105 recoiless that I dug from a tree trunk at Ft Stewart that I showed you? This round reminded me of those. A nasty round to deal with. I'd love to see a huge paper target after its been shot by this new canister round.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 11:15 am
Post subject: Re: M1028 Canister Round for M1's at Ft Hood...

- SFC_Jeff_Button
I envision a Mortar round that explodes downward with a smaller size pellet.


They had them years ago - they were called shrapnel rounds. Abandoned in favour of HE.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 3:59 pm
Post subject: Re: M1028 Canister Round for M1's at Ft Hood...

Hi Jeff! Hi Folks!

- SFC_Jeff_Button

I wonder what took so long to develop something like this?


As I understand some of it:
1. the end user didn't see a need, the primary mission and the only mission for the Abrams was stopping a Warsaw Pact armored attack. This is why for a number of years, I saw the M1A1 as a Tank Destoryer and not as a Main Battle Tank.
2. with the upgrade to the 120mm cannon, the Abrams just doesn't have a lot of room for main gun rounds.
3. Back to point one, for the longest time, no body asked for a new canister round
4. Tank became a dirty word. Remember the term 'Legacy Forces'? The next war doesn't need a 70 ton monster which we can't get to a distance battle field.

It wasn't until the 8th Army gave up on the M728 CEV that they started asking for a new canister round for use in Korea. 8th Army kept the M728 CEV in it's units long after the state side Army stopped supporting the system. Current post 'Major Combat' actions in Iraq clearly showed there was a need or use for something beside the Sabot and MPAT rounds.

My take on why it took so long,
Sgt, Scouts Out! Smile

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Skeet
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 15, 2006
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:15 am
Post subject: Re: M1028 Canister Round for M1's at Ft Hood...

Wonder why they didn't use flechettes?

Wazza M728 CEV?
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:56 am
Post subject: Re: M1028 Canister Round for M1's at Ft Hood...

Hi Skeet! Hi Folks!

- Skeet

Wonder why they didn't use flechettes?
Wazza M728 CEV?


Flechettes which are small nails work very well in heavy brush.
Steel balls work better in urban areas. Brick walls for one example.

M-728 CEV was a M-60 tank mounting a 165mm demolition howitzer, an A-frame for lifting things, a bull dozer blade with the fluid system mounted inside the armor rather than on the outside like a standard gun tank with a dozer blade.

CEV = Combat Engineer Vehicle

www.globalsecurity.org...d/m728.htm

My 2 cents and a spot report.
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Skeet
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 15, 2006
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 10:55 am
Post subject: Re: M1028 Canister Round for M1's at Ft Hood...

Dang nab it Roy. I thought you knew. TY
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 10:59 am
Post subject: Re: M1028 Canister Round for M1's at Ft Hood...

"Anatomy of an Abrams" aired last night on The Military Channel. I was surprized ot see it current enough to include the new canister round in it's section on main gun ammunition. I was really surprized, though, to see that the pellets were contained in the case where the propellent goes in the animated "x-ray view". Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 11:14 am
Post subject: Re: M1028 Canister Round for M1's at Ft Hood...

Hi everyone,
I think we are getting our rounds and reasons mixed a little. The Cannister round was requested by 8th Army after we turned in our M1/105's for M1A1's in '95. We gave up the APERS (Bee Hive) with the change to 120mm. It had 5000 fletchettes and used a manual fuze that the loader set from MA (muzzel action) to 4400 meters. Fletchettes don't get that good of a dispersion pattern with a smoothbore since the round isn't spinning. So we got a shotgun shell on steroids. Cannister was developed to fill that need but was slow getting fielded until OIF experiences. My belief was because 2ID was the only folks that wanted it until then. The loss of the M728 (CEV) created a need for an obstacle reduction round. Again, 8th Army was asking for a round to fill that need. The answer was the HE-OR round (High Explosive-Obstacle Reduction) which is a modified MPAT. These actually were fielded in Korea prior to OIF. Hope this clears the picture a little.

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:51 pm
Post subject: Re: M1028 Canister Round for M1's at Ft Hood...

I was under the understanding that flechettes had been banned under international treaty a long time ago (early 80s?). The wounds produced were just too nasty. I recall that same international convention sought to ban combat shotguns for the same reason, but the U.S. - pretty much the only user of combat shotguns anymore - dug in its heels and got its way. Remember, just a couple years ago there was a push to ban anti-personnel mines internationally but the U.S. dug in its heels once again. It main concern was covering the DMZ between N and S Korea without the use of anti-personnel mines.
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum