±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 189
Total: 189
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Community Forums
03: Home
04: Community Forums
05: Home
06: Community Forums
07: Home
08: Community Forums
09: Downloads
10: Community Forums
11: Photo Gallery
12: Downloads
13: Home
14: Home
15: Home
16: Downloads
17: Home
18: Member Screenshots
19: News Archive
20: Home
21: Home
22: Home
23: Home
24: Community Forums
25: Home
26: Home
27: Home
28: Home
29: Home
30: Community Forums
31: Home
32: Home
33: Home
34: Home
35: Home
36: Home
37: Community Forums
38: Home
39: Home
40: Home
41: Home
42: Home
43: Home
44: Home
45: Home
46: Community Forums
47: Community Forums
48: Home
49: Home
50: Home
51: Home
52: Home
53: Home
54: Home
55: Community Forums
56: Home
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Member Screenshots
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Home
63: Community Forums
64: Home
65: Community Forums
66: Home
67: Home
68: Community Forums
69: Home
70: Community Forums
71: Home
72: Home
73: Home
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Home
77: Home
78: Home
79: Home
80: Home
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: Photo Gallery
84: Home
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: Home
88: Community Forums
89: Home
90: Community Forums
91: Home
92: Home
93: Photo Gallery
94: Home
95: Home
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Community Forums
100: Community Forums
101: Home
102: Home
103: Downloads
104: Community Forums
105: Your Account
106: Home
107: Home
108: Contact
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Photo Gallery
115: Downloads
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Home
119: Community Forums
120: Community Forums
121: Home
122: Home
123: Photo Gallery
124: Community Forums
125: Photo Gallery
126: Community Forums
127: Home
128: Home
129: Home
130: Community Forums
131: Home
132: Photo Gallery
133: Community Forums
134: Home
135: Home
136: Home
137: Home
138: Home
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: Home
142: Home
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Home
147: Home
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Home
151: Downloads
152: Home
153: Home
154: Home
155: Home
156: Home
157: Downloads
158: Home
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Statistics
162: Community Forums
163: Downloads
164: Community Forums
165: Home
166: Home
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Home
173: Home
174: Downloads
175: Downloads
176: Community Forums
177: Home
178: Home
179: Home
180: Community Forums
181: Home
182: Home
183: Home
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Home
187: Home
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Ft Hood MATES M60A3 and M4 Sherman...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:40 pm
Post subject: Ft Hood MATES M60A3 and M4 Sherman...

Hey all, took the family on a 21 miles drive from out house up to the north art of the post where all the National Guard stuff is. I'd heard there was an M60 and an M4 there. True enought there was but they were locking up and told us to come back to see the M4 another time. Some 80year old gate guard that was an a-- and who could have probably been overtaken by blowing him over. I had to take the M4 pic's through the fence. From the pictures it appears to be an M4A3 (76) HVSS, with the metla T-66 track. What you cant see in these pictures is that the tread pattern on one is opposite the other side. Can these treads be put on backwards?
We were there at 17:00hrs, right as everyone was getting off from work. Seeing these guardsman walk out of the building with their BDU shirts unbuttoned and hanging open and with their patrol caps tilted back on their heads, makes me embarrassed to say I was ever in the Guard. I believe a phone call or even a personal visit by myself to the Major I spoke to up there might be in order.
That dogs grave marker was right under the rear of the M60. You can see one picture of a large field of tracked vehicles. There was one area of original M2 Bradleys without upgrades. I had'nt see those since 1994 when the scout platoon of 2-7IN, 24th ID had them.
[b]

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 6:02 pm
Post subject: Re: Ft Hood MATES M60A3 and M4 Sherman...

an M4 (105) HVSS
the AM radio is missing and the FM radio that it still has only picks up tokyo..
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
toadmanstankpictures
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 704

PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 6:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Ft Hood MATES M60A3 and M4 Sherman...

- SFC_Jeff_Button
pic's through the fence. From the pictures it appears to be an M4A3 (76) HVSS, with the metla T-66 track. What you cant see in these pictures is that the tread pattern on one is opposite the other side. Can these treads be put on backwards?


M4A3(105)HVSS with what appears to me to be T80 track. Yeah, they could be put on backwards but I'm sure it wasn't recommended!

_________________
Chris "toadman" Hughes
www.toadmanstankpictures.com
www.cafepress.com/toad...ksandstuff
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 10:13 pm
Post subject: Re: Ft Hood MATES M60A3 and M4 Sherman...

Hi Folks!

- toadmanstankpictures

- SFC_Jeff_Button
What you cant see in these pictures is that the tread pattern on one is opposite the other side. Can these treads be put on backwards?


M4A3(105)HVSS with what appears to me to be T80 track. Yeah, they could be put on backwards but I'm sure it wasn't recommended!


With most vehicles, there is no fit or operating problem with installing the track backwards. The problem is when the vehicle starts running through mud. For most vehicles, the pattern on the road surface of the track block is designed to throw the mud off as it comes up around the rear idler or rear drive sprocket. That type of block is called "self cleaning track". I for one who has cleaned a lot of mud off of many a track, am not sure it really works.

Spot Report!
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 11:18 pm
Post subject: Re: Ft Hood MATES M60A3 and M4 Sherman...

"THERE ISNT AND NEVER WILL BE A SELF-CLEANING ANYTHING!!!!!!!!"
Eugene Stoner
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 12:35 am
Post subject: Re: Ft Hood MATES M60A3 and M4 Sherman...

- Roy_A_Lingle
Hi Folks!

- toadmanstankpictures

- SFC_Jeff_Button
What you cant see in these pictures is that the tread pattern on one is opposite the other side. Can these treads be put on backwards?


M4A3(105)HVSS with what appears to me to be T80 track. Yeah, they could be put on backwards but I'm sure it wasn't recommended!


With most vehicles, there is no fit or operating problem with installing the track backwards. The problem is when the vehicle starts running through mud. For most vehicles, the pattern on the road surface of the track block is designed to throw the mud off as it comes up around the rear idler or rear drive sprocket. That type of block is called "self cleaning track". I for one who has cleaned a lot of mud off of many a track, am not sure it really works.

Spot Report!
Sgt, Scouts Out!


It actually does work, at least on tractors. When growing up I worked sometimes an a neighbors farm. One time his on and I were supposed to put the big drive wheels back on an old Minneapolis Moline tractor. We put them on with the Chevrons pointing down as you looked at the rear of the tire. Well when the farmer saw it he pointed at a muddy field and had his son drive through the field. Well in a minute or so the mud getting caught in the chevrons and getting flung over the top of the tire he made it back to the work area. Then the farmer exlained that having the chevrons pointing in the direction of travel allowed the mud to slide off the tire as it pulled out. pointing the wheels the way we had them caused the mud to stay trapped and flung it over the top (even more than it usually did) as well as causing a rougher ride as clumps got caught under the tire instead of being pushed to the side.

So it is self cleaning within the tire engineers definition of selfcleaning Rolling Eyes

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
ED_GILBERT
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 9:35 am
Post subject: Re: Ft Hood MATES M60A3 and M4 Sherman...

Actually guardpost weeniedom seems to be a characteristic of Texas posts. Some months ago I was supposed to give a talk at the one in Austin. Upon arrival, the senior NCO manning the gate acted a complete jackass, then kept me waiting for some time while he chatted up a blonde in the next car behind. Upon arrival and setting up the AV stuff, another one came in and flew into a huff that the area was reserved for a commander's briefing, blustered, threatened to have me thrown off the post, and generally acted a butt. It took higher level intervention to sort him out. My wife had meanwhile gone back off post, and when she came back aboard to pick me up, the gate guard apparently surpassed his original performance.

In the USMC we were taught to deal with all civilians as if they held the nominal rank of major. What the hell ever happened to common courtesy at these posts?
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 11:01 am
Post subject: Re: Ft Hood MATES M60A3 and M4 Sherman...

Hi Mr. Gilbert! Hi Folks!

Sad tail for your first post here.

Welcome to the new site, very glad to see you have made the transfer. All us CIAs need you and 'OldTop' to keep all of us squared away when it comes to Marine Armor! Ken is still missing. Sad

Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum