±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 500
Total: 500
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Home
03: Member Screenshots
04: Downloads
05: Community Forums
06: Home
07: Home
08: Community Forums
09: Community Forums
10: News Archive
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Photo Gallery
14: Home
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Home
19: Home
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Photo Gallery
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: Member Screenshots
26: Statistics
27: Photo Gallery
28: Photo Gallery
29: Home
30: Home
31: Home
32: Community Forums
33: Home
34: Home
35: Home
36: Home
37: Home
38: Home
39: Member Screenshots
40: Home
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Home
44: Home
45: Home
46: Community Forums
47: Downloads
48: Community Forums
49: Home
50: Community Forums
51: Home
52: Member Screenshots
53: Home
54: Home
55: Photo Gallery
56: Home
57: Community Forums
58: Home
59: Home
60: Statistics
61: Community Forums
62: Home
63: Downloads
64: Home
65: Community Forums
66: Community Forums
67: Home
68: Member Screenshots
69: Home
70: Member Screenshots
71: Home
72: Home
73: Home
74: Home
75: Home
76: Home
77: Community Forums
78: Home
79: Home
80: Home
81: Photo Gallery
82: Community Forums
83: Photo Gallery
84: Photo Gallery
85: Home
86: Community Forums
87: Home
88: Member Screenshots
89: Home
90: Home
91: Community Forums
92: Home
93: News
94: Home
95: Community Forums
96: Photo Gallery
97: Home
98: Community Forums
99: Community Forums
100: Photo Gallery
101: Photo Gallery
102: Downloads
103: Home
104: Home
105: Community Forums
106: Member Screenshots
107: Home
108: Member Screenshots
109: Home
110: Home
111: Home
112: Member Screenshots
113: Home
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Downloads
118: Downloads
119: Home
120: Photo Gallery
121: Community Forums
122: Home
123: Home
124: Home
125: Photo Gallery
126: Home
127: Home
128: Home
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Photo Gallery
134: Photo Gallery
135: Home
136: Downloads
137: Home
138: Home
139: Home
140: Member Screenshots
141: Photo Gallery
142: Downloads
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Downloads
150: Home
151: Home
152: Home
153: Downloads
154: Home
155: Home
156: Photo Gallery
157: Home
158: Home
159: Photo Gallery
160: Photo Gallery
161: Home
162: Community Forums
163: Home
164: Photo Gallery
165: Photo Gallery
166: Community Forums
167: Home
168: Home
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: News Archive
172: Home
173: Home
174: Member Screenshots
175: Home
176: Home
177: Home
178: Home
179: Community Forums
180: Home
181: Home
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Home
186: Member Screenshots
187: Home
188: Home
189: Photo Gallery
190: Photo Gallery
191: Downloads
192: Home
193: Home
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Home
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Home
202: Community Forums
203: Home
204: Home
205: Home
206: Member Screenshots
207: Photo Gallery
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Community Forums
211: Downloads
212: Photo Gallery
213: Home
214: Home
215: Community Forums
216: Home
217: Member Screenshots
218: Community Forums
219: Home
220: Photo Gallery
221: Photo Gallery
222: Home
223: Home
224: Home
225: Photo Gallery
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Home
229: Photo Gallery
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Community Forums
233: Downloads
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Home
237: Community Forums
238: Member Screenshots
239: Home
240: Community Forums
241: Home
242: Home
243: Home
244: Statistics
245: Community Forums
246: Community Forums
247: Home
248: Community Forums
249: Home
250: Photo Gallery
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Downloads
254: Photo Gallery
255: Member Screenshots
256: Community Forums
257: Home
258: Home
259: Home
260: Community Forums
261: Home
262: Home
263: Home
264: Home
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Photo Gallery
268: Photo Gallery
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Home
272: Home
273: Community Forums
274: Home
275: Home
276: Photo Gallery
277: Community Forums
278: Photo Gallery
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Photo Gallery
282: Community Forums
283: Home
284: Home
285: Home
286: Community Forums
287: Downloads
288: Home
289: Community Forums
290: Downloads
291: Community Forums
292: Photo Gallery
293: Community Forums
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Home
297: Home
298: Home
299: Community Forums
300: Home
301: Downloads
302: Home
303: Home
304: Community Forums
305: Downloads
306: Community Forums
307: Photo Gallery
308: Community Forums
309: Home
310: Home
311: Home
312: Home
313: Photo Gallery
314: Home
315: Home
316: Member Screenshots
317: Home
318: Photo Gallery
319: Home
320: Member Screenshots
321: Home
322: Home
323: Home
324: Home
325: Community Forums
326: Home
327: Downloads
328: News Archive
329: Photo Gallery
330: Photo Gallery
331: Community Forums
332: Photo Gallery
333: Community Forums
334: Community Forums
335: Member Screenshots
336: Home
337: Home
338: Downloads
339: Home
340: Home
341: Member Screenshots
342: Member Screenshots
343: News
344: Home
345: Home
346: Home
347: Home
348: Home
349: Photo Gallery
350: Community Forums
351: Member Screenshots
352: Home
353: Photo Gallery
354: Community Forums
355: Community Forums
356: Community Forums
357: Photo Gallery
358: Home
359: Home
360: Community Forums
361: Home
362: Member Screenshots
363: Home
364: Community Forums
365: Home
366: Home
367: Community Forums
368: Community Forums
369: Community Forums
370: Member Screenshots
371: Photo Gallery
372: Community Forums
373: Home
374: Home
375: Home
376: Home
377: Home
378: Downloads
379: Photo Gallery
380: Home
381: Statistics
382: Photo Gallery
383: Downloads
384: Community Forums
385: Community Forums
386: Home
387: Community Forums
388: Community Forums
389: Community Forums
390: Downloads
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: Home
394: Community Forums
395: Photo Gallery
396: Home
397: Member Screenshots
398: Home
399: Photo Gallery
400: Home
401: Home
402: Home
403: Home
404: Community Forums
405: Photo Gallery
406: Photo Gallery
407: Community Forums
408: Community Forums
409: Community Forums
410: Home
411: Member Screenshots
412: Home
413: Community Forums
414: Home
415: Home
416: Community Forums
417: Home
418: Community Forums
419: Community Forums
420: Community Forums
421: Community Forums
422: Photo Gallery
423: Photo Gallery
424: Community Forums
425: Home
426: Photo Gallery
427: Home
428: Community Forums
429: Home
430: Home
431: Community Forums
432: Member Screenshots
433: News
434: Community Forums
435: Home
436: Home
437: Community Forums
438: Home
439: Community Forums
440: Community Forums
441: Community Forums
442: Downloads
443: Community Forums
444: Downloads
445: Home
446: Home
447: Member Screenshots
448: Community Forums
449: Member Screenshots
450: Home
451: Member Screenshots
452: Member Screenshots
453: Home
454: Downloads
455: Photo Gallery
456: Photo Gallery
457: Member Screenshots
458: Community Forums
459: Photo Gallery
460: Home
461: Community Forums
462: Home
463: Home
464: Photo Gallery
465: Photo Gallery
466: Home
467: Home
468: Home
469: Community Forums
470: Photo Gallery
471: Photo Gallery
472: Community Forums
473: Photo Gallery
474: Community Forums
475: Photo Gallery
476: Home
477: Home
478: Home
479: Member Screenshots
480: Home
481: Home
482: Member Screenshots
483: Home
484: Community Forums
485: Downloads
486: Home
487: Community Forums
488: Photo Gallery
489: Community Forums
490: Home
491: Community Forums
492: Home
493: Home
494: Home
495: Home
496: Home
497: Downloads
498: Downloads
499: Community Forums
500: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:51 am
Post subject: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

I dont just post rare old armor, I post rare "new" armor as well! Per the article below, there are only 44 of these in the U.S. inventory. There were these 6 in the 36th ENG BDE, 4th ID motor pool and 6 more in a motorpool next door. When I was here in 2000 with 3-66th Armor, 4th ID, civilians brought one to our motor pool as a "demo" and it was pretty neat. Now they are actually stationed here. I haven't seen any in the 1st Cav area motor pools but I'd bet they have some too. I was in this motor pool to photograph an M4A3 that I cant seem to find a serial number for. I purchased some sandpaper this afternoon however and that serial wont be hidden long! Below is some info on the Wolverine.

The M104 Wolverine Heavy Assault Bridge is an armored combat engineering vehicle designed to provide deployable bridge capability for units engaged in military operations.

For over a quarter of a century the US Army has made use of armored bridgelaying vehicles based on the M60/M48 Patton series of tanks. In recent years, however, the Army discovered that the aging M60 AVLB (Armored Vehicle Launched Bridge) was too slow to keep up with the M1 Abrams during field maneuvers. Additionally, the M1 was so heavy that it could safely cross the AVLB's bridge only at a very slow speed.

Program development for a new armored bridgelaying vehicle began in 1983, and by 1994 General Dynamics Land Systems had been awarded a contract. The first prototype vehicles were being tested by 1996, and the first production models were delivered to the Army by 2003.

Because the Wolverine is essentially an M1A2 SEP tank with bridgelaying gear instead of a turret it shares virtually all of the parent vehicle's speed, mobility, survivability, and automotive components. This commonality was a key design factor in the Wolverine's development. The Wolverine also features an advanced communication package designed to keep it in contact with local field commanders. However, the vehicle itself is completely unarmed.

The Wolverine is operated by two crewmen who sit within the hull. Both crewmen have access to the bridging controls, while the bridge itself is carried in two sections above the hull. Once a bridging site is chosen the vehicle securely anchors itself in place with a spade. The two sections of the bridge are joined together, and then the entire bridge is extended across the obstacle and dropped into place. During launch the crewmen have the ability to make minor corrections if needed. Once operations are complete the Wolverine drives across the bridge and retrieves it from the other side simply by reversing the process. The bridge can be launched in under 5 minutes or retrieved in less than 10, all without the crewmen ever leaving the safety of their vehicle.

Once launched, the 26 meter bridge can support a 70 ton vehicle moving at 16 km/h. The Wolverine allows even the heaviest of vehicles to cross craters, ditches, and even partially damaged bridges at combat speed. This mobility is a decisive advantage for armored units.

To date the U.S. Army has received 44 Wolverines, which have been distributed to a few select engineer units. The Army had originally intended to purchase 465 vehicles, however budget cuts and the recent shift in philosophy toward a lighter fighting force have cast the future of the Wolverine program in doubt. Currently the Army does not plan to purchase any more Wolverines, but it has reserved the right to restart production in the future if necessary.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Maple_Leaf_Eh
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 517

PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:50 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

"The M104 Wolverine Heavy Assault Bridge is an armored combat engineering vehicle designed to provide deployable bridge capability for units engaged in military operations.
...
However, the vehicle itself is completely unarmed."

Yikes!! That's got to change. If this is such a rare bird, the opposing forces are going to know it too. Their troops will do what they can to harass or attack it. Even a .50 in a protected remote controlled weapons pod would be an improvement over nothing.
Back to top
View user's profile
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:54 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

I agree, I was surprised to see that it wasn't armed at all. Especially since its such a high-dollar vehicle. I wouldn't want to crew this.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 10:32 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

Lets face it the M9 ACE is the same. I was amused to read in a combat report the following description of it 'one man, alone, unarmed'

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 8:57 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

Hi Folks!

The proto-type M-48 AVLB had two cuplo mounted M2 50 cal machine guns. The production versions didn't have them. The M-60 AVLB were also unarmed.

That vehicle should never be sent out by its self. There should be more than enough firepower around it to ensure the crew only has to work on getting the bridge down in the right spot so over vehicles can cross ASAP.

Jeff, super thanks for this set of photos. I have hopes of some day trying to scratch build a Wolverine sense none of the model companies will most likly never do one.

It is my understand that in place of buying more Wolverines, the Army funded a program to upgrade the MLC 60 bridges on the M-48/60 AVLBs to a MLC of 70. Much cheaper to buy upgraded folding bridges than rebuild a M-1 into a Wolverine.

Spot Report!
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 9:14 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

- Roy_A_Lingle
Hi Folks!

It is my understand that in place of buying more Wolverines, the Army funded a program to upgrade the MLC 60 bridges on the M-48/60 AVLBs to a MLC of 70. Much cheaper to buy upgraded folding bridges than rebuild a M-1 into a Wolverine.

Spot Report!
Sgt, Scouts Out!


But you loose the advantage of commonality and have to continue stocking parts in the system for the older vehicles that you would not otherwise have to have.

I can see and advantage to modifying the older AVLBs in the short term but as there are extra M1 chassis in the inventory I would think that converting some to support vehicles such as AVLBs, recovery vehicles and engineering vehicles would make sense.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2068
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 9:28 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

But there is commonality with the old AVLB's, it's called the Hercules M88A2 and they have a very good track record. We also have plenty of M88A1's too. If you look closely at the M60 AVLB/AVLM systems they are now using M88 components when rebuilt. Much cheaper than converting old M1 hulls, Also cheaper to operate. BTW, the Wolverine uses the old M1 hull, just like the SEP's. One automotive difference is the the hydraulic pump is driven off the angle drive of the transmission and the generator was moved to the Auxillary Gear Box from what I saw in 98. What the Wolverine has is speed, but with the current fight we are in it's a moot point.

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 9:57 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

Hi Bob! Hi Folks!

- bsmart

I can see and advantage to modifying the older AVLBs in the short term but as there are extra M1 chassis in the inventory I would think that converting some to support vehicles such as AVLBs, recovery vehicles and engineering vehicles would make sense.


I have to agree with that Bob. However the problem is a lack of funds. The Wolverine and the Grizzle are programs that were cut to free up funding for the Stryker FOVs and has yet to be restored.

It's like Joe D said, their are just not needed in the current fight. Look at the M1117 ASV. It was also one of those programs that was cut to free up funding for the Stryker FOVs. If's fund has been restored some because they are needed.

This is another one of those things where funding is the controlling factor and not common sense.
Sgt, Scouts out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:05 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

- Roy_A_Lingle
Hi Bob! Hi Folks!

- bsmart

I can see and advantage to modifying the older AVLBs in the short term but as there are extra M1 chassis in the inventory I would think that converting some to support vehicles such as AVLBs, recovery vehicles and engineering vehicles would make sense.


I have to agree with that Bob. However the problem is a lack of funds. The Wolverine and the Grizzle are programs that were cut to free up funding for the Stryker FOVs and has yet to be restored.

It's like Joe D said, their are just not needed in the current fight. Look at the M1117 ASV. It was also one of those programs that was cut to free up funding for the Stryker FOVs. If's fund has been restored some because they are needed.

This is another one of those things where funding is the controlling factor and not common sense.
Sgt, Scouts out!


I think there is very little that is not controlled by short term funding issues.

I'm noticing a trend that we saw in the 60s where long term programs are being sacrificed to pay for growing operational costs while trying to stay within lower 'acceptable' budgets. Crying or Very sad I remember living in the aftermath of that on the flightline in the mid 70s with not enough parts because although they bought a new fighter ( the F-15) they scimped on the supporting kit to hold the cost of the program down.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:19 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

Hi Bob! Hi Folks!

- bsmart

I think there is very little that is not controlled by short term funding issues.

I'm noticing a trend that we saw in the 60s where long term programs are being sacrificed to pay for growing operational costs while trying to stay within lower 'acceptable' budgets. Crying or Very sad I remember living in the aftermath of that on the flightline in the mid 70s with not enough parts because although they bought a new fighter ( the F-15) they scimped on the supporting kit to hold the cost of the program down.


The 1970s! The last half was hard on all of DOD. I remember reading about new F-16s coming off the production line in Ft. Worth. The Air Force would install an engine, send the aircraft up for a test flight and then remove the engine so it could installed in the next aircraft. The Army was putting a lot of it's available funding into the new Abrams/Bradley vehicles and there was very little funds for very much of any thing else. God help the AFV Crewman who lost a tool needed to work on his vehicle because the supply room didn't have any funds to buy replacement tools.

Hell, costs and the need from funds for other programs is the only reason the Navy has retired the F-14 Tomcats. I have heard, but I have not confired it, that the S-3 Vikings have been or are being retired, or there is a plan to retire them for the same reason.

All this is an outstanding example of why the DOD doesn't always buy good things at the right time. Sad
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum