±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 527
Total: 527
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Photo Gallery
02: Home
03: Photo Gallery
04: Community Forums
05: Home
06: Community Forums
07: Photo Gallery
08: Home
09: Home
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Home
15: Home
16: Community Forums
17: Home
18: Photo Gallery
19: Community Forums
20: Home
21: Home
22: Home
23: Home
24: Photo Gallery
25: Community Forums
26: Downloads
27: Home
28: Home
29: Home
30: Home
31: Community Forums
32: Home
33: Photo Gallery
34: Home
35: Community Forums
36: Home
37: Home
38: Home
39: Home
40: Home
41: Home
42: Home
43: Home
44: Home
45: Home
46: Home
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Photo Gallery
51: Home
52: Member Screenshots
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Photo Gallery
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Home
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Photo Gallery
64: Member Screenshots
65: Downloads
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Home
73: Home
74: Member Screenshots
75: Home
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: Photo Gallery
80: Community Forums
81: Home
82: Photo Gallery
83: Home
84: Downloads
85: Photo Gallery
86: Downloads
87: Community Forums
88: Photo Gallery
89: Photo Gallery
90: Home
91: Home
92: News Archive
93: Home
94: Home
95: Your Account
96: Community Forums
97: Home
98: Home
99: Home
100: Home
101: Community Forums
102: Home
103: Photo Gallery
104: Home
105: Member Screenshots
106: Downloads
107: Home
108: Community Forums
109: Home
110: Home
111: Community Forums
112: Home
113: Home
114: Home
115: Photo Gallery
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Photo Gallery
119: Home
120: Home
121: Home
122: Community Forums
123: Home
124: Community Forums
125: Home
126: Home
127: Home
128: Home
129: Photo Gallery
130: Home
131: Photo Gallery
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Home
140: Photo Gallery
141: Home
142: Member Screenshots
143: Community Forums
144: Home
145: Home
146: Photo Gallery
147: Home
148: Home
149: Photo Gallery
150: Home
151: News Archive
152: Photo Gallery
153: Home
154: News Archive
155: News Archive
156: Downloads
157: Home
158: Community Forums
159: Home
160: Home
161: Community Forums
162: Home
163: Home
164: Home
165: Home
166: Home
167: Home
168: Home
169: Community Forums
170: Home
171: Community Forums
172: Photo Gallery
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Statistics
178: Home
179: Home
180: Photo Gallery
181: Photo Gallery
182: Home
183: Photo Gallery
184: News Archive
185: Member Screenshots
186: Home
187: Downloads
188: Photo Gallery
189: Home
190: Home
191: Home
192: Home
193: Home
194: Home
195: Home
196: Community Forums
197: News
198: Photo Gallery
199: Community Forums
200: Home
201: Home
202: Photo Gallery
203: Member Screenshots
204: Photo Gallery
205: Community Forums
206: Home
207: Photo Gallery
208: Home
209: Member Screenshots
210: Photo Gallery
211: Community Forums
212: Home
213: Home
214: Home
215: Home
216: Community Forums
217: Home
218: Home
219: Home
220: Home
221: Member Screenshots
222: Photo Gallery
223: Home
224: Community Forums
225: Community Forums
226: News Archive
227: Downloads
228: Home
229: Home
230: Downloads
231: Home
232: Home
233: Home
234: Home
235: Member Screenshots
236: Home
237: Photo Gallery
238: Community Forums
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: Home
243: Community Forums
244: Photo Gallery
245: Community Forums
246: Community Forums
247: Home
248: Community Forums
249: Home
250: Home
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Home
254: Photo Gallery
255: Community Forums
256: Photo Gallery
257: Community Forums
258: Home
259: Home
260: Home
261: Home
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: News Archive
265: Home
266: Photo Gallery
267: News
268: Community Forums
269: Home
270: Member Screenshots
271: Community Forums
272: Community Forums
273: Home
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Downloads
277: Home
278: Home
279: Home
280: Community Forums
281: News Archive
282: Community Forums
283: Home
284: Community Forums
285: Photo Gallery
286: Home
287: Community Forums
288: Home
289: Community Forums
290: Home
291: Community Forums
292: Community Forums
293: Home
294: Member Screenshots
295: Home
296: Home
297: Community Forums
298: Photo Gallery
299: Home
300: Home
301: Home
302: Home
303: Community Forums
304: Home
305: Home
306: Home
307: Home
308: Home
309: Home
310: Community Forums
311: Your Account
312: Home
313: News
314: Home
315: Home
316: Home
317: Community Forums
318: Home
319: Photo Gallery
320: Community Forums
321: Downloads
322: Home
323: Community Forums
324: Home
325: Downloads
326: Home
327: Community Forums
328: Home
329: Community Forums
330: Member Screenshots
331: Home
332: Community Forums
333: Home
334: Community Forums
335: Home
336: Photo Gallery
337: Member Screenshots
338: Community Forums
339: Community Forums
340: Community Forums
341: Community Forums
342: Downloads
343: Photo Gallery
344: Community Forums
345: Photo Gallery
346: Community Forums
347: Photo Gallery
348: Community Forums
349: Photo Gallery
350: Downloads
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Community Forums
354: Home
355: Home
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Member Screenshots
359: Downloads
360: Community Forums
361: Home
362: Community Forums
363: Community Forums
364: Home
365: Downloads
366: Community Forums
367: Home
368: Photo Gallery
369: Community Forums
370: Community Forums
371: Home
372: Community Forums
373: Community Forums
374: Community Forums
375: Community Forums
376: Home
377: Home
378: Home
379: Photo Gallery
380: Community Forums
381: Community Forums
382: Community Forums
383: Home
384: Home
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Community Forums
388: Community Forums
389: Photo Gallery
390: Community Forums
391: Community Forums
392: Community Forums
393: Photo Gallery
394: Community Forums
395: Photo Gallery
396: Community Forums
397: Photo Gallery
398: Community Forums
399: Community Forums
400: Home
401: Photo Gallery
402: Photo Gallery
403: Community Forums
404: Member Screenshots
405: Home
406: Home
407: Home
408: Community Forums
409: Community Forums
410: Home
411: Community Forums
412: Community Forums
413: Home
414: Home
415: Community Forums
416: Community Forums
417: Community Forums
418: Community Forums
419: Community Forums
420: Home
421: Community Forums
422: Photo Gallery
423: Home
424: Community Forums
425: Community Forums
426: Community Forums
427: Photo Gallery
428: Community Forums
429: Home
430: Photo Gallery
431: Community Forums
432: Community Forums
433: Photo Gallery
434: Community Forums
435: Home
436: Community Forums
437: Community Forums
438: Community Forums
439: Home
440: Community Forums
441: Statistics
442: Home
443: Home
444: Home
445: Home
446: News Archive
447: Community Forums
448: Home
449: Photo Gallery
450: Photo Gallery
451: Photo Gallery
452: Community Forums
453: Home
454: Home
455: Community Forums
456: Community Forums
457: Home
458: Community Forums
459: Home
460: Home
461: Home
462: Home
463: Home
464: Home
465: Home
466: Home
467: Home
468: Home
469: Photo Gallery
470: Photo Gallery
471: Community Forums
472: Home
473: Home
474: News Archive
475: Community Forums
476: Home
477: Community Forums
478: Photo Gallery
479: Home
480: Community Forums
481: Community Forums
482: Downloads
483: Home
484: Community Forums
485: Home
486: Community Forums
487: Home
488: Photo Gallery
489: Community Forums
490: Community Forums
491: Community Forums
492: Photo Gallery
493: Photo Gallery
494: Home
495: Home
496: Community Forums
497: Community Forums
498: Photo Gallery
499: Community Forums
500: Community Forums
501: Home
502: Community Forums
503: Community Forums
504: Community Forums
505: Community Forums
506: Home
507: Community Forums
508: Photo Gallery
509: Community Forums
510: Community Forums
511: Community Forums
512: Community Forums
513: Member Screenshots
514: Member Screenshots
515: Community Forums
516: Statistics
517: Photo Gallery
518: Member Screenshots
519: Community Forums
520: Downloads
521: Community Forums
522: Photo Gallery
523: Photo Gallery
524: Photo Gallery
525: Home
526: News
527: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:51 am
Post subject: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

I dont just post rare old armor, I post rare "new" armor as well! Per the article below, there are only 44 of these in the U.S. inventory. There were these 6 in the 36th ENG BDE, 4th ID motor pool and 6 more in a motorpool next door. When I was here in 2000 with 3-66th Armor, 4th ID, civilians brought one to our motor pool as a "demo" and it was pretty neat. Now they are actually stationed here. I haven't seen any in the 1st Cav area motor pools but I'd bet they have some too. I was in this motor pool to photograph an M4A3 that I cant seem to find a serial number for. I purchased some sandpaper this afternoon however and that serial wont be hidden long! Below is some info on the Wolverine.

The M104 Wolverine Heavy Assault Bridge is an armored combat engineering vehicle designed to provide deployable bridge capability for units engaged in military operations.

For over a quarter of a century the US Army has made use of armored bridgelaying vehicles based on the M60/M48 Patton series of tanks. In recent years, however, the Army discovered that the aging M60 AVLB (Armored Vehicle Launched Bridge) was too slow to keep up with the M1 Abrams during field maneuvers. Additionally, the M1 was so heavy that it could safely cross the AVLB's bridge only at a very slow speed.

Program development for a new armored bridgelaying vehicle began in 1983, and by 1994 General Dynamics Land Systems had been awarded a contract. The first prototype vehicles were being tested by 1996, and the first production models were delivered to the Army by 2003.

Because the Wolverine is essentially an M1A2 SEP tank with bridgelaying gear instead of a turret it shares virtually all of the parent vehicle's speed, mobility, survivability, and automotive components. This commonality was a key design factor in the Wolverine's development. The Wolverine also features an advanced communication package designed to keep it in contact with local field commanders. However, the vehicle itself is completely unarmed.

The Wolverine is operated by two crewmen who sit within the hull. Both crewmen have access to the bridging controls, while the bridge itself is carried in two sections above the hull. Once a bridging site is chosen the vehicle securely anchors itself in place with a spade. The two sections of the bridge are joined together, and then the entire bridge is extended across the obstacle and dropped into place. During launch the crewmen have the ability to make minor corrections if needed. Once operations are complete the Wolverine drives across the bridge and retrieves it from the other side simply by reversing the process. The bridge can be launched in under 5 minutes or retrieved in less than 10, all without the crewmen ever leaving the safety of their vehicle.

Once launched, the 26 meter bridge can support a 70 ton vehicle moving at 16 km/h. The Wolverine allows even the heaviest of vehicles to cross craters, ditches, and even partially damaged bridges at combat speed. This mobility is a decisive advantage for armored units.

To date the U.S. Army has received 44 Wolverines, which have been distributed to a few select engineer units. The Army had originally intended to purchase 465 vehicles, however budget cuts and the recent shift in philosophy toward a lighter fighting force have cast the future of the Wolverine program in doubt. Currently the Army does not plan to purchase any more Wolverines, but it has reserved the right to restart production in the future if necessary.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Maple_Leaf_Eh
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 517

PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:50 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

"The M104 Wolverine Heavy Assault Bridge is an armored combat engineering vehicle designed to provide deployable bridge capability for units engaged in military operations.
...
However, the vehicle itself is completely unarmed."

Yikes!! That's got to change. If this is such a rare bird, the opposing forces are going to know it too. Their troops will do what they can to harass or attack it. Even a .50 in a protected remote controlled weapons pod would be an improvement over nothing.
Back to top
View user's profile
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:54 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

I agree, I was surprised to see that it wasn't armed at all. Especially since its such a high-dollar vehicle. I wouldn't want to crew this.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 10:32 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

Lets face it the M9 ACE is the same. I was amused to read in a combat report the following description of it 'one man, alone, unarmed'

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 8:57 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

Hi Folks!

The proto-type M-48 AVLB had two cuplo mounted M2 50 cal machine guns. The production versions didn't have them. The M-60 AVLB were also unarmed.

That vehicle should never be sent out by its self. There should be more than enough firepower around it to ensure the crew only has to work on getting the bridge down in the right spot so over vehicles can cross ASAP.

Jeff, super thanks for this set of photos. I have hopes of some day trying to scratch build a Wolverine sense none of the model companies will most likly never do one.

It is my understand that in place of buying more Wolverines, the Army funded a program to upgrade the MLC 60 bridges on the M-48/60 AVLBs to a MLC of 70. Much cheaper to buy upgraded folding bridges than rebuild a M-1 into a Wolverine.

Spot Report!
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 9:14 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

- Roy_A_Lingle
Hi Folks!

It is my understand that in place of buying more Wolverines, the Army funded a program to upgrade the MLC 60 bridges on the M-48/60 AVLBs to a MLC of 70. Much cheaper to buy upgraded folding bridges than rebuild a M-1 into a Wolverine.

Spot Report!
Sgt, Scouts Out!


But you loose the advantage of commonality and have to continue stocking parts in the system for the older vehicles that you would not otherwise have to have.

I can see and advantage to modifying the older AVLBs in the short term but as there are extra M1 chassis in the inventory I would think that converting some to support vehicles such as AVLBs, recovery vehicles and engineering vehicles would make sense.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2069
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 9:28 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

But there is commonality with the old AVLB's, it's called the Hercules M88A2 and they have a very good track record. We also have plenty of M88A1's too. If you look closely at the M60 AVLB/AVLM systems they are now using M88 components when rebuilt. Much cheaper than converting old M1 hulls, Also cheaper to operate. BTW, the Wolverine uses the old M1 hull, just like the SEP's. One automotive difference is the the hydraulic pump is driven off the angle drive of the transmission and the generator was moved to the Auxillary Gear Box from what I saw in 98. What the Wolverine has is speed, but with the current fight we are in it's a moot point.

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 9:57 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

Hi Bob! Hi Folks!

- bsmart

I can see and advantage to modifying the older AVLBs in the short term but as there are extra M1 chassis in the inventory I would think that converting some to support vehicles such as AVLBs, recovery vehicles and engineering vehicles would make sense.


I have to agree with that Bob. However the problem is a lack of funds. The Wolverine and the Grizzle are programs that were cut to free up funding for the Stryker FOVs and has yet to be restored.

It's like Joe D said, their are just not needed in the current fight. Look at the M1117 ASV. It was also one of those programs that was cut to free up funding for the Stryker FOVs. If's fund has been restored some because they are needed.

This is another one of those things where funding is the controlling factor and not common sense.
Sgt, Scouts out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:05 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

- Roy_A_Lingle
Hi Bob! Hi Folks!

- bsmart

I can see and advantage to modifying the older AVLBs in the short term but as there are extra M1 chassis in the inventory I would think that converting some to support vehicles such as AVLBs, recovery vehicles and engineering vehicles would make sense.


I have to agree with that Bob. However the problem is a lack of funds. The Wolverine and the Grizzle are programs that were cut to free up funding for the Stryker FOVs and has yet to be restored.

It's like Joe D said, their are just not needed in the current fight. Look at the M1117 ASV. It was also one of those programs that was cut to free up funding for the Stryker FOVs. If's fund has been restored some because they are needed.

This is another one of those things where funding is the controlling factor and not common sense.
Sgt, Scouts out!


I think there is very little that is not controlled by short term funding issues.

I'm noticing a trend that we saw in the 60s where long term programs are being sacrificed to pay for growing operational costs while trying to stay within lower 'acceptable' budgets. Crying or Very sad I remember living in the aftermath of that on the flightline in the mid 70s with not enough parts because although they bought a new fighter ( the F-15) they scimped on the supporting kit to hold the cost of the program down.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:19 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

Hi Bob! Hi Folks!

- bsmart

I think there is very little that is not controlled by short term funding issues.

I'm noticing a trend that we saw in the 60s where long term programs are being sacrificed to pay for growing operational costs while trying to stay within lower 'acceptable' budgets. Crying or Very sad I remember living in the aftermath of that on the flightline in the mid 70s with not enough parts because although they bought a new fighter ( the F-15) they scimped on the supporting kit to hold the cost of the program down.


The 1970s! The last half was hard on all of DOD. I remember reading about new F-16s coming off the production line in Ft. Worth. The Air Force would install an engine, send the aircraft up for a test flight and then remove the engine so it could installed in the next aircraft. The Army was putting a lot of it's available funding into the new Abrams/Bradley vehicles and there was very little funds for very much of any thing else. God help the AFV Crewman who lost a tool needed to work on his vehicle because the supply room didn't have any funds to buy replacement tools.

Hell, costs and the need from funds for other programs is the only reason the Navy has retired the F-14 Tomcats. I have heard, but I have not confired it, that the S-3 Vikings have been or are being retired, or there is a plan to retire them for the same reason.

All this is an outstanding example of why the DOD doesn't always buy good things at the right time. Sad
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum