±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 384
Total: 384
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Home
06: News Archive
07: Community Forums
08: Home
09: Home
10: Community Forums
11: Home
12: Community Forums
13: Home
14: Community Forums
15: Home
16: Home
17: Home
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: Home
21: Home
22: Home
23: Member Screenshots
24: Home
25: Home
26: Home
27: Community Forums
28: Home
29: Downloads
30: Member Screenshots
31: Home
32: Home
33: Home
34: Home
35: Home
36: Community Forums
37: Member Screenshots
38: Home
39: Member Screenshots
40: Member Screenshots
41: Home
42: Home
43: Member Screenshots
44: Community Forums
45: Downloads
46: Home
47: Home
48: Member Screenshots
49: Member Screenshots
50: Photo Gallery
51: Member Screenshots
52: Downloads
53: Statistics
54: Member Screenshots
55: Member Screenshots
56: News Archive
57: News Archive
58: Member Screenshots
59: Photo Gallery
60: Member Screenshots
61: Photo Gallery
62: Photo Gallery
63: Home
64: Home
65: News Archive
66: Member Screenshots
67: Member Screenshots
68: Downloads
69: News Archive
70: Downloads
71: Photo Gallery
72: Home
73: Community Forums
74: Photo Gallery
75: Home
76: Your Account
77: Photo Gallery
78: Downloads
79: Home
80: Statistics
81: Downloads
82: Photo Gallery
83: Member Screenshots
84: Home
85: Community Forums
86: Photo Gallery
87: Community Forums
88: Home
89: Home
90: Member Screenshots
91: Home
92: Home
93: Home
94: Community Forums
95: Home
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Community Forums
100: News Archive
101: Photo Gallery
102: Home
103: Downloads
104: Home
105: Statistics
106: Home
107: News Archive
108: Member Screenshots
109: Community Forums
110: Member Screenshots
111: Downloads
112: Downloads
113: Community Forums
114: Photo Gallery
115: Home
116: Community Forums
117: Home
118: Community Forums
119: Home
120: Home
121: Photo Gallery
122: Community Forums
123: Member Screenshots
124: News
125: Community Forums
126: Home
127: Home
128: Community Forums
129: Home
130: Downloads
131: Downloads
132: Member Screenshots
133: News Archive
134: Home
135: Member Screenshots
136: Home
137: Home
138: Community Forums
139: Home
140: Home
141: Home
142: Member Screenshots
143: Home
144: News Archive
145: Member Screenshots
146: Member Screenshots
147: Community Forums
148: Home
149: Home
150: Home
151: Community Forums
152: Home
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Home
156: Community Forums
157: Home
158: Community Forums
159: Home
160: Home
161: Home
162: News Archive
163: Member Screenshots
164: Home
165: Photo Gallery
166: Community Forums
167: Community Forums
168: Statistics
169: Community Forums
170: Your Account
171: Photo Gallery
172: Photo Gallery
173: Community Forums
174: Home
175: Community Forums
176: Your Account
177: Member Screenshots
178: Member Screenshots
179: Community Forums
180: Home
181: Community Forums
182: Home
183: Home
184: Photo Gallery
185: Member Screenshots
186: Home
187: Member Screenshots
188: Home
189: Home
190: Home
191: Home
192: Home
193: Home
194: Home
195: Community Forums
196: Home
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Community Forums
200: Statistics
201: Home
202: Home
203: Member Screenshots
204: News Archive
205: Home
206: Member Screenshots
207: Community Forums
208: Home
209: Community Forums
210: Community Forums
211: Downloads
212: Community Forums
213: Member Screenshots
214: Downloads
215: Home
216: Downloads
217: Downloads
218: Downloads
219: Home
220: Member Screenshots
221: Home
222: Home
223: Member Screenshots
224: Home
225: Photo Gallery
226: Member Screenshots
227: Home
228: Community Forums
229: Home
230: Statistics
231: Member Screenshots
232: Home
233: Home
234: Home
235: Home
236: Community Forums
237: Community Forums
238: Home
239: Home
240: News
241: Home
242: Home
243: Community Forums
244: Photo Gallery
245: Home
246: News Archive
247: Community Forums
248: Home
249: Home
250: Home
251: Member Screenshots
252: Home
253: Home
254: Home
255: Community Forums
256: Home
257: Home
258: Home
259: Home
260: Home
261: Home
262: Member Screenshots
263: Home
264: Home
265: Community Forums
266: News Archive
267: Community Forums
268: Member Screenshots
269: Home
270: Home
271: Home
272: Home
273: Community Forums
274: Home
275: Photo Gallery
276: Community Forums
277: Home
278: Home
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Photo Gallery
282: News Archive
283: Downloads
284: Downloads
285: Member Screenshots
286: Home
287: Home
288: Community Forums
289: Downloads
290: Home
291: Photo Gallery
292: Community Forums
293: Home
294: Community Forums
295: Home
296: Home
297: Community Forums
298: Photo Gallery
299: Home
300: Home
301: Home
302: Home
303: Home
304: Home
305: Home
306: Community Forums
307: Home
308: Home
309: Downloads
310: Community Forums
311: Home
312: Home
313: Home
314: Photo Gallery
315: Statistics
316: Home
317: Home
318: Home
319: Home
320: Home
321: Downloads
322: Home
323: Home
324: Member Screenshots
325: Community Forums
326: Your Account
327: Home
328: Home
329: Community Forums
330: Home
331: Home
332: Member Screenshots
333: Community Forums
334: Home
335: Community Forums
336: Home
337: Downloads
338: Community Forums
339: Community Forums
340: Home
341: Photo Gallery
342: Home
343: Community Forums
344: Home
345: Community Forums
346: News Archive
347: Member Screenshots
348: Home
349: Community Forums
350: Community Forums
351: Community Forums
352: Member Screenshots
353: Downloads
354: Tell a Friend
355: Home
356: Member Screenshots
357: Home
358: Community Forums
359: Member Screenshots
360: Home
361: Member Screenshots
362: Downloads
363: Downloads
364: Downloads
365: Community Forums
366: Community Forums
367: Photo Gallery
368: Downloads
369: Home
370: Home
371: Photo Gallery
372: Home
373: Community Forums
374: News Archive
375: Home
376: Home
377: Member Screenshots
378: Photo Gallery
379: Home
380: Member Screenshots
381: Downloads
382: Member Screenshots
383: Community Forums
384: Photo Gallery

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:51 am
Post subject: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

I dont just post rare old armor, I post rare "new" armor as well! Per the article below, there are only 44 of these in the U.S. inventory. There were these 6 in the 36th ENG BDE, 4th ID motor pool and 6 more in a motorpool next door. When I was here in 2000 with 3-66th Armor, 4th ID, civilians brought one to our motor pool as a "demo" and it was pretty neat. Now they are actually stationed here. I haven't seen any in the 1st Cav area motor pools but I'd bet they have some too. I was in this motor pool to photograph an M4A3 that I cant seem to find a serial number for. I purchased some sandpaper this afternoon however and that serial wont be hidden long! Below is some info on the Wolverine.

The M104 Wolverine Heavy Assault Bridge is an armored combat engineering vehicle designed to provide deployable bridge capability for units engaged in military operations.

For over a quarter of a century the US Army has made use of armored bridgelaying vehicles based on the M60/M48 Patton series of tanks. In recent years, however, the Army discovered that the aging M60 AVLB (Armored Vehicle Launched Bridge) was too slow to keep up with the M1 Abrams during field maneuvers. Additionally, the M1 was so heavy that it could safely cross the AVLB's bridge only at a very slow speed.

Program development for a new armored bridgelaying vehicle began in 1983, and by 1994 General Dynamics Land Systems had been awarded a contract. The first prototype vehicles were being tested by 1996, and the first production models were delivered to the Army by 2003.

Because the Wolverine is essentially an M1A2 SEP tank with bridgelaying gear instead of a turret it shares virtually all of the parent vehicle's speed, mobility, survivability, and automotive components. This commonality was a key design factor in the Wolverine's development. The Wolverine also features an advanced communication package designed to keep it in contact with local field commanders. However, the vehicle itself is completely unarmed.

The Wolverine is operated by two crewmen who sit within the hull. Both crewmen have access to the bridging controls, while the bridge itself is carried in two sections above the hull. Once a bridging site is chosen the vehicle securely anchors itself in place with a spade. The two sections of the bridge are joined together, and then the entire bridge is extended across the obstacle and dropped into place. During launch the crewmen have the ability to make minor corrections if needed. Once operations are complete the Wolverine drives across the bridge and retrieves it from the other side simply by reversing the process. The bridge can be launched in under 5 minutes or retrieved in less than 10, all without the crewmen ever leaving the safety of their vehicle.

Once launched, the 26 meter bridge can support a 70 ton vehicle moving at 16 km/h. The Wolverine allows even the heaviest of vehicles to cross craters, ditches, and even partially damaged bridges at combat speed. This mobility is a decisive advantage for armored units.

To date the U.S. Army has received 44 Wolverines, which have been distributed to a few select engineer units. The Army had originally intended to purchase 465 vehicles, however budget cuts and the recent shift in philosophy toward a lighter fighting force have cast the future of the Wolverine program in doubt. Currently the Army does not plan to purchase any more Wolverines, but it has reserved the right to restart production in the future if necessary.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Maple_Leaf_Eh
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 517

PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:50 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

"The M104 Wolverine Heavy Assault Bridge is an armored combat engineering vehicle designed to provide deployable bridge capability for units engaged in military operations.
...
However, the vehicle itself is completely unarmed."

Yikes!! That's got to change. If this is such a rare bird, the opposing forces are going to know it too. Their troops will do what they can to harass or attack it. Even a .50 in a protected remote controlled weapons pod would be an improvement over nothing.
Back to top
View user's profile
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:54 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

I agree, I was surprised to see that it wasn't armed at all. Especially since its such a high-dollar vehicle. I wouldn't want to crew this.

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 10:32 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

Lets face it the M9 ACE is the same. I was amused to read in a combat report the following description of it 'one man, alone, unarmed'

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 8:57 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

Hi Folks!

The proto-type M-48 AVLB had two cuplo mounted M2 50 cal machine guns. The production versions didn't have them. The M-60 AVLB were also unarmed.

That vehicle should never be sent out by its self. There should be more than enough firepower around it to ensure the crew only has to work on getting the bridge down in the right spot so over vehicles can cross ASAP.

Jeff, super thanks for this set of photos. I have hopes of some day trying to scratch build a Wolverine sense none of the model companies will most likly never do one.

It is my understand that in place of buying more Wolverines, the Army funded a program to upgrade the MLC 60 bridges on the M-48/60 AVLBs to a MLC of 70. Much cheaper to buy upgraded folding bridges than rebuild a M-1 into a Wolverine.

Spot Report!
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 9:14 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

- Roy_A_Lingle
Hi Folks!

It is my understand that in place of buying more Wolverines, the Army funded a program to upgrade the MLC 60 bridges on the M-48/60 AVLBs to a MLC of 70. Much cheaper to buy upgraded folding bridges than rebuild a M-1 into a Wolverine.

Spot Report!
Sgt, Scouts Out!


But you loose the advantage of commonality and have to continue stocking parts in the system for the older vehicles that you would not otherwise have to have.

I can see and advantage to modifying the older AVLBs in the short term but as there are extra M1 chassis in the inventory I would think that converting some to support vehicles such as AVLBs, recovery vehicles and engineering vehicles would make sense.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2068
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 9:28 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

But there is commonality with the old AVLB's, it's called the Hercules M88A2 and they have a very good track record. We also have plenty of M88A1's too. If you look closely at the M60 AVLB/AVLM systems they are now using M88 components when rebuilt. Much cheaper than converting old M1 hulls, Also cheaper to operate. BTW, the Wolverine uses the old M1 hull, just like the SEP's. One automotive difference is the the hydraulic pump is driven off the angle drive of the transmission and the generator was moved to the Auxillary Gear Box from what I saw in 98. What the Wolverine has is speed, but with the current fight we are in it's a moot point.

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 9:57 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

Hi Bob! Hi Folks!

- bsmart

I can see and advantage to modifying the older AVLBs in the short term but as there are extra M1 chassis in the inventory I would think that converting some to support vehicles such as AVLBs, recovery vehicles and engineering vehicles would make sense.


I have to agree with that Bob. However the problem is a lack of funds. The Wolverine and the Grizzle are programs that were cut to free up funding for the Stryker FOVs and has yet to be restored.

It's like Joe D said, their are just not needed in the current fight. Look at the M1117 ASV. It was also one of those programs that was cut to free up funding for the Stryker FOVs. If's fund has been restored some because they are needed.

This is another one of those things where funding is the controlling factor and not common sense.
Sgt, Scouts out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:05 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

- Roy_A_Lingle
Hi Bob! Hi Folks!

- bsmart

I can see and advantage to modifying the older AVLBs in the short term but as there are extra M1 chassis in the inventory I would think that converting some to support vehicles such as AVLBs, recovery vehicles and engineering vehicles would make sense.


I have to agree with that Bob. However the problem is a lack of funds. The Wolverine and the Grizzle are programs that were cut to free up funding for the Stryker FOVs and has yet to be restored.

It's like Joe D said, their are just not needed in the current fight. Look at the M1117 ASV. It was also one of those programs that was cut to free up funding for the Stryker FOVs. If's fund has been restored some because they are needed.

This is another one of those things where funding is the controlling factor and not common sense.
Sgt, Scouts out!


I think there is very little that is not controlled by short term funding issues.

I'm noticing a trend that we saw in the 60s where long term programs are being sacrificed to pay for growing operational costs while trying to stay within lower 'acceptable' budgets. Crying or Very sad I remember living in the aftermath of that on the flightline in the mid 70s with not enough parts because although they bought a new fighter ( the F-15) they scimped on the supporting kit to hold the cost of the program down.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:19 am
Post subject: Re: M104 Wolverine at Ft Hood...

Hi Bob! Hi Folks!

- bsmart

I think there is very little that is not controlled by short term funding issues.

I'm noticing a trend that we saw in the 60s where long term programs are being sacrificed to pay for growing operational costs while trying to stay within lower 'acceptable' budgets. Crying or Very sad I remember living in the aftermath of that on the flightline in the mid 70s with not enough parts because although they bought a new fighter ( the F-15) they scimped on the supporting kit to hold the cost of the program down.


The 1970s! The last half was hard on all of DOD. I remember reading about new F-16s coming off the production line in Ft. Worth. The Air Force would install an engine, send the aircraft up for a test flight and then remove the engine so it could installed in the next aircraft. The Army was putting a lot of it's available funding into the new Abrams/Bradley vehicles and there was very little funds for very much of any thing else. God help the AFV Crewman who lost a tool needed to work on his vehicle because the supply room didn't have any funds to buy replacement tools.

Hell, costs and the need from funds for other programs is the only reason the Navy has retired the F-14 Tomcats. I have heard, but I have not confired it, that the S-3 Vikings have been or are being retired, or there is a plan to retire them for the same reason.

All this is an outstanding example of why the DOD doesn't always buy good things at the right time. Sad
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum