±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 372
Total: 372
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: Community Forums
05: Home
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Home
09: Photo Gallery
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: Community Forums
13: Photo Gallery
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Community Forums
24: Photo Gallery
25: Home
26: Downloads
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: News Archive
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Photo Gallery
36: Home
37: Home
38: Community Forums
39: Statistics
40: Statistics
41: Member Screenshots
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Downloads
45: Statistics
46: Downloads
47: Photo Gallery
48: Community Forums
49: Home
50: Member Screenshots
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Photo Gallery
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Home
60: Home
61: Photo Gallery
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Photo Gallery
66: Home
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Community Forums
70: Home
71: Downloads
72: Photo Gallery
73: Community Forums
74: News Archive
75: Community Forums
76: Photo Gallery
77: Member Screenshots
78: Home
79: Community Forums
80: Your Account
81: Community Forums
82: Member Screenshots
83: Photo Gallery
84: Photo Gallery
85: News Archive
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Photo Gallery
89: Community Forums
90: Member Screenshots
91: Member Screenshots
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: News Archive
97: Community Forums
98: Downloads
99: Home
100: Member Screenshots
101: Home
102: Community Forums
103: Downloads
104: Member Screenshots
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: Member Screenshots
114: Member Screenshots
115: Downloads
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Home
119: Photo Gallery
120: Member Screenshots
121: Tell a Friend
122: Member Screenshots
123: Community Forums
124: Community Forums
125: Community Forums
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: Home
129: Community Forums
130: Member Screenshots
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Member Screenshots
134: Member Screenshots
135: Member Screenshots
136: News
137: Member Screenshots
138: Community Forums
139: Community Forums
140: Downloads
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Home
146: Community Forums
147: News
148: Member Screenshots
149: News Archive
150: Community Forums
151: Member Screenshots
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Photo Gallery
155: Home
156: Downloads
157: Tell a Friend
158: Member Screenshots
159: News
160: Community Forums
161: Downloads
162: Member Screenshots
163: Community Forums
164: Photo Gallery
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Home
173: Home
174: Photo Gallery
175: Home
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Home
179: Home
180: Home
181: Home
182: Member Screenshots
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Member Screenshots
188: Home
189: Home
190: Community Forums
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Statistics
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Home
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Member Screenshots
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Member Screenshots
203: Community Forums
204: Member Screenshots
205: Downloads
206: Community Forums
207: Member Screenshots
208: Home
209: Community Forums
210: Community Forums
211: News Archive
212: Home
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Member Screenshots
219: Photo Gallery
220: Member Screenshots
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Statistics
224: Community Forums
225: Community Forums
226: Home
227: Community Forums
228: Photo Gallery
229: Home
230: Member Screenshots
231: Community Forums
232: Photo Gallery
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Community Forums
237: Member Screenshots
238: Home
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Statistics
242: Photo Gallery
243: Downloads
244: Member Screenshots
245: Community Forums
246: Community Forums
247: Member Screenshots
248: Community Forums
249: Member Screenshots
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Photo Gallery
253: Community Forums
254: Photo Gallery
255: Community Forums
256: Downloads
257: Home
258: Member Screenshots
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Home
262: Community Forums
263: Home
264: Community Forums
265: Home
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Home
272: Home
273: Community Forums
274: Member Screenshots
275: News Archive
276: Photo Gallery
277: Member Screenshots
278: Community Forums
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Home
287: Community Forums
288: Home
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Member Screenshots
292: Community Forums
293: Community Forums
294: News Archive
295: Community Forums
296: Home
297: Home
298: Home
299: Member Screenshots
300: Member Screenshots
301: Home
302: Photo Gallery
303: Statistics
304: Community Forums
305: Photo Gallery
306: Downloads
307: Community Forums
308: Community Forums
309: News Archive
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Home
313: Home
314: Community Forums
315: Community Forums
316: Downloads
317: Home
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Home
323: Community Forums
324: Community Forums
325: Community Forums
326: Member Screenshots
327: Community Forums
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: Community Forums
331: News Archive
332: Community Forums
333: Photo Gallery
334: Photo Gallery
335: Photo Gallery
336: Photo Gallery
337: Photo Gallery
338: Photo Gallery
339: Home
340: Community Forums
341: Home
342: Community Forums
343: Home
344: Downloads
345: Community Forums
346: Community Forums
347: Community Forums
348: Community Forums
349: Community Forums
350: Home
351: Community Forums
352: Community Forums
353: Photo Gallery
354: Photo Gallery
355: Home
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Community Forums
359: Home
360: Member Screenshots
361: Community Forums
362: Community Forums
363: Home
364: Member Screenshots
365: Photo Gallery
366: Community Forums
367: Community Forums
368: Photo Gallery
369: Community Forums
370: Community Forums
371: Home
372: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
sherman 105mm
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Sundrtonge
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 35

PostPosted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:55 pm
Post subject: sherman 105mm

Hi,

new to the board. I was wondering if anyone here might possibly have any technical data on the sherman 105mm, specifically the gun its ammo, its HE or possible AP performance, range of the weapon useage of the weapon (i.e. direct, indirect etc) etc.

No i dont have the Hunnicutt book as of yet, a bit pricey right now for me. But as I mentioned in the previous post I think when I get a chance I will nominate it and the other Hunnicutt books (if I can get the ISBN #'s) for digital reprinting so that at least there would be a chance of them becomming available even if the quality wouldnt be a great.

thanks,
-Dave
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 12:31 am
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

Welcome Aboard

The 105mm in the Sherman was ballistically compatable with thestandard M2 (later called the M101) 105mm howitzer. The ammunition consisted of the standard selectionof rounds that the Field Artillery 105mm had. It was capable of both direct and indirect fire in fact there racks on them to hold the aiming stakes required to set up the gun postion for Fire Direction Center control.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
binder001
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 363

PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 12:56 am
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

Some quick remarks on the AP performance you requested...

1) the 105mm HEAT shell could penetrate a Panther's glacis at 500 yds - based on US firing tests at Isigny, France in the summer of 1944.

2) to modify the above - the 105mm howitzer M4 used in the M4s and M4A3s with 105 mm Howitzers was basically set up as a field artillery weapon. It did not have a semi-automatic breech as most tank guns do (the semi-auto breech opens at the end of the recoil stroke and ejects the empty casing, allowing a faster reload). The original production 105mm armed medium tanks also did not have power turret traverse. These add to to a tank that might work in ambush, but watch out if you miss that first shot!
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 1:11 am
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

Hi Dave! Hi Folks!

- Sundrtonge

Hi, new to the board.

Welcome to the group!

- Sundrtonge

I was wondering if anyone here might possibly have any technical data on the sherman 105mm, specifically the gun its ammo, its HE or possible AP performance, range of the weapon useage of the weapon (i.e. direct, indirect etc) etc.


Here is some of what you are looking for:
105mm howitzer M4 in mount M52
Traverse manuel on early vehicles, later hydraulic power added
Elevation +35 to -10 degrees
Firing rate: 8 rounds per minute
Vehicle could carry 66 rounds of 105 mm ammo.
Ammo was semifixed, variable charge except for the HEAT M67 round
M67 HEAT-T shell
M60 WP smoke shell
M84 HC BE shell (My note: some type of smoke round)
M1 HE shell
Max range:
M1 at max charge 12,205 yards
M67 8,590 yards
M60 12,150 yards
M84 12,205 yards
Armor pentration: M67 HEAT shell, 0 degrees obliquity 4.0 inches at any range.

- Sundrtonge

I think when I get a chance I will nominate it ....for digital reprinting so that at least there would be a chance of them becomming available even if the quality wouldnt be a great.


I have one book that was done by digital reprinting. "On Point" by the Association of the U.S. Army (AUSA) printed by the Naval Institute Press. AUSA was in a rush to get that book out and elected to go with digital printing because it was faster.

Many of the maps are nothing but dark blobs. Many of the photos are very dark and it is almost impossible to pick out much detail. For example, photos of individuals. You can not make out their faces. As for vehicles, you can see the outline, but details of the vehicles are dark spots. The printed word is great. But most of the photos are just wasted pages. NO, it is not a problem with the original photos and maps. After buy the book, I ran acrossed a copy on the internet of the report the book is based on. The photos and maps in the internet copy are clear and not dark reproductions.

If that is an example of the quailty of digital reprinting (another member once told us that a digital reprint of Hunnicutt's book would be a waste of money) then I would also say, don't waste you money unless you can inspect the book first to insure the photos are OK.

Spot report on the 105mm howitzer and my 2 cents on digital printing of photos.
Sgt, Scouts Out! Smile

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
JWB2
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 199

PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:14 am
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

When (what year) was that digital printing done? Nowadays digital printing can be extremely high quality.
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 7:18 am
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

- Roy_A_Lingle


Many of the maps are nothing but dark blobs. Many of the photos are very dark and it is almost impossible to pick out much detail. For example, photos of individuals. You can not make out their faces. As for vehicles, you can see the outline, but details of the vehicles are dark spots. The printed word is great. But most of the photos are just wasted pages. NO, it is not a problem with the original photos and maps. After buy the book, I ran acrossed a copy on the internet of the report the book is based on. The photos and maps in the internet copy are clear and not dark reproductions.


Sounds more like crappy photocopying - digital reprinting is usually very high quality stuff.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 4:24 pm
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

Hi JWB! Hi Folks!

- JWB2

When (what year) was that digital printing done? Nowadays digital printing can be extremely high quality.


The copy write is 2005.

Jim posted:
"Sounds more like crappy photocopying - digital reprinting is usually very high quality stuff."

I agree with the crappy part, that's what it looks like. As far as I know "On Point" is the only book I have or have seen that was digital printed. The written part is high quality. All I can say is from what little I have seen, I would not buy a digital reprinted book with out looking at it first.

My confuzed 2 cents, Confused
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
LeeW
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 61

PostPosted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 4:34 pm
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

- binder001
Some quick remarks on the AP performance you requested...

1) the 105mm HEAT shell could penetrate a Panther's glacis at 500 yds - based on US firing tests at Isigny, France in the summer of 1944.
...!


Note that HEAT performance is almost independent of range. In the case of this round it probably improved with range. PH on the other hand .....
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 6:16 pm
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

- Roy_A_Lingle

Jim posted:
"Sounds more like crappy photocopying - digital reprinting is usually very high quality stuff."

I agree with the crappy part, that's what it looks like. As far as I know "On Point" is the only book I have or have seen that was digital printed. The written part is high quality. All I can say is from what little I have seen, I would not buy a digital reprinted book with out looking at it first.


Actually having said that a lot depends on the scanning - But generally the larger the scan file the better the quality.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Sundrtonge
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 35

PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 4:53 pm
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

Thanks for the replies, they are great! Dont get to spend too much time on the borads hence have not been here in a few.

Quick question on the HEAT performance the range doesnt matter?? - any idea on the distance that HEAT projectile might be able to be shot fromthat 105mm?


Quick note on the nominating a book for digital. I actually went and nominated the title but they sent me an email back stating I would have to contact the publisher on this title. I agree the digital printing isnt the best but I do many books with it and it is a nice alternative just to have something available at a reasonable cost Smile

thanks again!
-Dave

BTW I was just down at Aberdeen in Maryland and snapped off about 1100 pictures or so, if I get a chance ill throw a few up latter on. The curator and staff down there were awesome to our needs!
Back to top
View user's profile
Sundrtonge
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 35

PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 5:00 pm
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

oops should have read a little closer Shocked - looks like the HEAT range of

M67 8,590 yards?

_dave
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 5:01 pm
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

If you had mentioned it earlier, Bob Smart probably could have arranged for a behind the scenes tour at the museum...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Sundrtonge
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 35

PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 5:04 pm
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

And for the whys of this - I am desiging a simple WWII armor game for my company as I am not satisfied with what is out there now.

Bob Smart? i think I spoke to you about my Aberdeen trip through geroge Bradford? HI!

-Dave
Back to top
View user's profile
LeeW
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 61

PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 5:29 pm
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

- Sundrtonge
...Quick question on the HEAT performance the range doesnt matter?? ...!

Actually that's only a first order approximation due to a couple of factors either not well understood or who's fix was known or considered worth while WWII HEAT rounds especially those from a cannon (as opposed to say a bazooka, rifle grenade, or panzer faust) actually probably improved with range. There are two reasons for this:
1) spinning (due to using a rifled barrel) tends to cut down on the penetration of HEAT rounds. The further the shell got from the barrel the slower the sping and the less this effect.
2) To get maximum effect from a HEAT round you want to detonate it a bit before it reaches the target (this the standoff probes on most current HEAT rounds). If the round is traveling slower when it hits this tends to give it a bit more "stand off".
Now whether the effect of either of these two was noticable between say 500 yards and 1,000 yards I don't know (and rather doubt). Certainly the PH of a HEAT round was going to go down pretty rapidly as range increased. Also there is the possibility that as long as the round penetrated the disbursing effect of the spin and higher velocity might actually enhance the behind armor effects.

For game purposes I'd probably not get into any of this....
Back to top
View user's profile
Sundrtonge
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 35

PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 5:40 pm
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

Hi Neil,

i think I did speak with Bob and it just didnt happen, I didnt raelize this until a little bit ago. Him and Geroge have been great! I was able to get a behind the scenes tour as well, though they were quite busy. I snaged up shots of the Elephant as well over at the railhead, pretty cool vehicle!

I was just doing a bit of math, if the 105 has the same performance as the artillery piece, but the elevation allowance is about half that of the artillery piece I would think it is safe to assume that the range of the 105 Sherman would be about hald for indirect fire.

-Dave
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum