±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 348
Total: 348
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Home
03: Community Forums
04: Downloads
05: Home
06: Community Forums
07: Downloads
08: Photo Gallery
09: Photo Gallery
10: Home
11: Community Forums
12: Home
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Home
16: News Archive
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Home
20: Community Forums
21: Home
22: Community Forums
23: Community Forums
24: Home
25: Community Forums
26: Home
27: Community Forums
28: Home
29: Downloads
30: Photo Gallery
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Photo Gallery
34: Home
35: Home
36: Home
37: Community Forums
38: Home
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Home
42: Downloads
43: Home
44: Home
45: Home
46: Community Forums
47: Home
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Home
52: Photo Gallery
53: Home
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Downloads
57: Home
58: Community Forums
59: Home
60: Photo Gallery
61: Community Forums
62: Photo Gallery
63: Photo Gallery
64: Community Forums
65: Home
66: Home
67: Home
68: Home
69: Community Forums
70: Home
71: Community Forums
72: Home
73: Community Forums
74: Member Screenshots
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Community Forums
78: Photo Gallery
79: Member Screenshots
80: Home
81: Downloads
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: Home
85: Home
86: Community Forums
87: Home
88: Home
89: Community Forums
90: Home
91: Home
92: Home
93: Community Forums
94: Home
95: Member Screenshots
96: Home
97: Community Forums
98: Home
99: Community Forums
100: Home
101: Community Forums
102: Home
103: Home
104: Home
105: Home
106: Home
107: Home
108: Community Forums
109: Home
110: Member Screenshots
111: Community Forums
112: News Archive
113: Home
114: Home
115: Home
116: Photo Gallery
117: Home
118: Community Forums
119: Home
120: Home
121: Photo Gallery
122: Home
123: Community Forums
124: Photo Gallery
125: Community Forums
126: Home
127: Community Forums
128: Community Forums
129: Home
130: News Archive
131: Community Forums
132: Photo Gallery
133: Photo Gallery
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: News
137: Photo Gallery
138: Home
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Home
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Photo Gallery
146: Home
147: Home
148: Home
149: Home
150: Home
151: Home
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Supporters
158: Home
159: Home
160: Home
161: Home
162: Community Forums
163: Home
164: Your Account
165: Community Forums
166: Home
167: Member Screenshots
168: Home
169: Community Forums
170: Home
171: Member Screenshots
172: Community Forums
173: Member Screenshots
174: Home
175: Home
176: Community Forums
177: Home
178: Community Forums
179: Community Forums
180: Photo Gallery
181: Community Forums
182: News Archive
183: Home
184: Photo Gallery
185: Home
186: Home
187: Community Forums
188: Photo Gallery
189: News
190: Home
191: News Archive
192: Home
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Home
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Downloads
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Home
202: News
203: Community Forums
204: Photo Gallery
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Photo Gallery
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Home
214: News
215: Home
216: Community Forums
217: Home
218: Community Forums
219: Home
220: Community Forums
221: Home
222: Community Forums
223: Photo Gallery
224: Home
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Home
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Home
235: Home
236: Photo Gallery
237: Home
238: Home
239: Photo Gallery
240: Home
241: Home
242: Home
243: Home
244: News
245: Community Forums
246: Member Screenshots
247: Home
248: Home
249: Photo Gallery
250: Home
251: Photo Gallery
252: Community Forums
253: Member Screenshots
254: Community Forums
255: Home
256: Community Forums
257: Home
258: Community Forums
259: Downloads
260: Home
261: Community Forums
262: Photo Gallery
263: Community Forums
264: Home
265: Community Forums
266: Downloads
267: Home
268: Community Forums
269: Photo Gallery
270: Statistics
271: Community Forums
272: Member Screenshots
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: Downloads
279: Your Account
280: Home
281: Home
282: Community Forums
283: Home
284: Community Forums
285: Community Forums
286: Community Forums
287: Home
288: Home
289: Photo Gallery
290: Member Screenshots
291: News
292: Community Forums
293: Community Forums
294: Photo Gallery
295: Community Forums
296: Photo Gallery
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Community Forums
300: Member Screenshots
301: Community Forums
302: Photo Gallery
303: Home
304: Home
305: Home
306: Member Screenshots
307: Home
308: Home
309: Home
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Community Forums
313: Community Forums
314: Community Forums
315: Home
316: Photo Gallery
317: Home
318: Home
319: Home
320: Home
321: Community Forums
322: Home
323: Downloads
324: Home
325: Community Forums
326: Home
327: Community Forums
328: Community Forums
329: Community Forums
330: Community Forums
331: Home
332: Home
333: Home
334: Community Forums
335: Community Forums
336: Home
337: Home
338: Home
339: Downloads
340: Community Forums
341: Home
342: Member Screenshots
343: Community Forums
344: Community Forums
345: Home
346: Home
347: Member Screenshots
348: Home

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
sherman 105mm
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Sundrtonge
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 35

PostPosted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:55 pm
Post subject: sherman 105mm

Hi,

new to the board. I was wondering if anyone here might possibly have any technical data on the sherman 105mm, specifically the gun its ammo, its HE or possible AP performance, range of the weapon useage of the weapon (i.e. direct, indirect etc) etc.

No i dont have the Hunnicutt book as of yet, a bit pricey right now for me. But as I mentioned in the previous post I think when I get a chance I will nominate it and the other Hunnicutt books (if I can get the ISBN #'s) for digital reprinting so that at least there would be a chance of them becomming available even if the quality wouldnt be a great.

thanks,
-Dave
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 12:31 am
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

Welcome Aboard

The 105mm in the Sherman was ballistically compatable with thestandard M2 (later called the M101) 105mm howitzer. The ammunition consisted of the standard selectionof rounds that the Field Artillery 105mm had. It was capable of both direct and indirect fire in fact there racks on them to hold the aiming stakes required to set up the gun postion for Fire Direction Center control.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
binder001
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 363

PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 12:56 am
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

Some quick remarks on the AP performance you requested...

1) the 105mm HEAT shell could penetrate a Panther's glacis at 500 yds - based on US firing tests at Isigny, France in the summer of 1944.

2) to modify the above - the 105mm howitzer M4 used in the M4s and M4A3s with 105 mm Howitzers was basically set up as a field artillery weapon. It did not have a semi-automatic breech as most tank guns do (the semi-auto breech opens at the end of the recoil stroke and ejects the empty casing, allowing a faster reload). The original production 105mm armed medium tanks also did not have power turret traverse. These add to to a tank that might work in ambush, but watch out if you miss that first shot!
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 1:11 am
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

Hi Dave! Hi Folks!

- Sundrtonge

Hi, new to the board.

Welcome to the group!

- Sundrtonge

I was wondering if anyone here might possibly have any technical data on the sherman 105mm, specifically the gun its ammo, its HE or possible AP performance, range of the weapon useage of the weapon (i.e. direct, indirect etc) etc.


Here is some of what you are looking for:
105mm howitzer M4 in mount M52
Traverse manuel on early vehicles, later hydraulic power added
Elevation +35 to -10 degrees
Firing rate: 8 rounds per minute
Vehicle could carry 66 rounds of 105 mm ammo.
Ammo was semifixed, variable charge except for the HEAT M67 round
M67 HEAT-T shell
M60 WP smoke shell
M84 HC BE shell (My note: some type of smoke round)
M1 HE shell
Max range:
M1 at max charge 12,205 yards
M67 8,590 yards
M60 12,150 yards
M84 12,205 yards
Armor pentration: M67 HEAT shell, 0 degrees obliquity 4.0 inches at any range.

- Sundrtonge

I think when I get a chance I will nominate it ....for digital reprinting so that at least there would be a chance of them becomming available even if the quality wouldnt be a great.


I have one book that was done by digital reprinting. "On Point" by the Association of the U.S. Army (AUSA) printed by the Naval Institute Press. AUSA was in a rush to get that book out and elected to go with digital printing because it was faster.

Many of the maps are nothing but dark blobs. Many of the photos are very dark and it is almost impossible to pick out much detail. For example, photos of individuals. You can not make out their faces. As for vehicles, you can see the outline, but details of the vehicles are dark spots. The printed word is great. But most of the photos are just wasted pages. NO, it is not a problem with the original photos and maps. After buy the book, I ran acrossed a copy on the internet of the report the book is based on. The photos and maps in the internet copy are clear and not dark reproductions.

If that is an example of the quailty of digital reprinting (another member once told us that a digital reprint of Hunnicutt's book would be a waste of money) then I would also say, don't waste you money unless you can inspect the book first to insure the photos are OK.

Spot report on the 105mm howitzer and my 2 cents on digital printing of photos.
Sgt, Scouts Out! Smile

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
JWB2
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 199

PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:14 am
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

When (what year) was that digital printing done? Nowadays digital printing can be extremely high quality.
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 7:18 am
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

- Roy_A_Lingle


Many of the maps are nothing but dark blobs. Many of the photos are very dark and it is almost impossible to pick out much detail. For example, photos of individuals. You can not make out their faces. As for vehicles, you can see the outline, but details of the vehicles are dark spots. The printed word is great. But most of the photos are just wasted pages. NO, it is not a problem with the original photos and maps. After buy the book, I ran acrossed a copy on the internet of the report the book is based on. The photos and maps in the internet copy are clear and not dark reproductions.


Sounds more like crappy photocopying - digital reprinting is usually very high quality stuff.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 4:24 pm
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

Hi JWB! Hi Folks!

- JWB2

When (what year) was that digital printing done? Nowadays digital printing can be extremely high quality.


The copy write is 2005.

Jim posted:
"Sounds more like crappy photocopying - digital reprinting is usually very high quality stuff."

I agree with the crappy part, that's what it looks like. As far as I know "On Point" is the only book I have or have seen that was digital printed. The written part is high quality. All I can say is from what little I have seen, I would not buy a digital reprinted book with out looking at it first.

My confuzed 2 cents, Confused
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
LeeW
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 61

PostPosted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 4:34 pm
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

- binder001
Some quick remarks on the AP performance you requested...

1) the 105mm HEAT shell could penetrate a Panther's glacis at 500 yds - based on US firing tests at Isigny, France in the summer of 1944.
...!


Note that HEAT performance is almost independent of range. In the case of this round it probably improved with range. PH on the other hand .....
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 6:16 pm
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

- Roy_A_Lingle

Jim posted:
"Sounds more like crappy photocopying - digital reprinting is usually very high quality stuff."

I agree with the crappy part, that's what it looks like. As far as I know "On Point" is the only book I have or have seen that was digital printed. The written part is high quality. All I can say is from what little I have seen, I would not buy a digital reprinted book with out looking at it first.


Actually having said that a lot depends on the scanning - But generally the larger the scan file the better the quality.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Sundrtonge
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 35

PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 4:53 pm
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

Thanks for the replies, they are great! Dont get to spend too much time on the borads hence have not been here in a few.

Quick question on the HEAT performance the range doesnt matter?? - any idea on the distance that HEAT projectile might be able to be shot fromthat 105mm?


Quick note on the nominating a book for digital. I actually went and nominated the title but they sent me an email back stating I would have to contact the publisher on this title. I agree the digital printing isnt the best but I do many books with it and it is a nice alternative just to have something available at a reasonable cost Smile

thanks again!
-Dave

BTW I was just down at Aberdeen in Maryland and snapped off about 1100 pictures or so, if I get a chance ill throw a few up latter on. The curator and staff down there were awesome to our needs!
Back to top
View user's profile
Sundrtonge
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 35

PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 5:00 pm
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

oops should have read a little closer Shocked - looks like the HEAT range of

M67 8,590 yards?

_dave
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 5:01 pm
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

If you had mentioned it earlier, Bob Smart probably could have arranged for a behind the scenes tour at the museum...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Sundrtonge
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 35

PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 5:04 pm
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

And for the whys of this - I am desiging a simple WWII armor game for my company as I am not satisfied with what is out there now.

Bob Smart? i think I spoke to you about my Aberdeen trip through geroge Bradford? HI!

-Dave
Back to top
View user's profile
LeeW
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 61

PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 5:29 pm
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

- Sundrtonge
...Quick question on the HEAT performance the range doesnt matter?? ...!

Actually that's only a first order approximation due to a couple of factors either not well understood or who's fix was known or considered worth while WWII HEAT rounds especially those from a cannon (as opposed to say a bazooka, rifle grenade, or panzer faust) actually probably improved with range. There are two reasons for this:
1) spinning (due to using a rifled barrel) tends to cut down on the penetration of HEAT rounds. The further the shell got from the barrel the slower the sping and the less this effect.
2) To get maximum effect from a HEAT round you want to detonate it a bit before it reaches the target (this the standoff probes on most current HEAT rounds). If the round is traveling slower when it hits this tends to give it a bit more "stand off".
Now whether the effect of either of these two was noticable between say 500 yards and 1,000 yards I don't know (and rather doubt). Certainly the PH of a HEAT round was going to go down pretty rapidly as range increased. Also there is the possibility that as long as the round penetrated the disbursing effect of the spin and higher velocity might actually enhance the behind armor effects.

For game purposes I'd probably not get into any of this....
Back to top
View user's profile
Sundrtonge
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 35

PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 5:40 pm
Post subject: Re: sherman 105mm

Hi Neil,

i think I did speak with Bob and it just didnt happen, I didnt raelize this until a little bit ago. Him and Geroge have been great! I was able to get a behind the scenes tour as well, though they were quite busy. I snaged up shots of the Elephant as well over at the railhead, pretty cool vehicle!

I was just doing a bit of math, if the 105 has the same performance as the artillery piece, but the elevation allowance is about half that of the artillery piece I would think it is safe to assume that the range of the 105 Sherman would be about hald for indirect fire.

-Dave
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum