±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 320
Total: 320
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Photo Gallery
03: CPGlang
04: Community Forums
05: Downloads
06: Community Forums
07: Home
08: Downloads
09: Community Forums
10: Downloads
11: Downloads
12: Community Forums
13: Photo Gallery
14: Member Screenshots
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Community Forums
19: Downloads
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Community Forums
24: Photo Gallery
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Member Screenshots
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Home
33: Photo Gallery
34: Photo Gallery
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Home
38: Community Forums
39: Downloads
40: Downloads
41: CPGlang
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Home
45: Photo Gallery
46: Photo Gallery
47: Downloads
48: Community Forums
49: Statistics
50: Home
51: Community Forums
52: Statistics
53: CPGlang
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Home
59: Home
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Home
64: Photo Gallery
65: Community Forums
66: Member Screenshots
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Photo Gallery
70: Photo Gallery
71: CPGlang
72: Member Screenshots
73: Community Forums
74: Home
75: Home
76: Community Forums
77: Home
78: Community Forums
79: Home
80: Community Forums
81: Home
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: Downloads
85: Home
86: Community Forums
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Home
90: Community Forums
91: Community Forums
92: Photo Gallery
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Community Forums
99: Community Forums
100: Community Forums
101: Community Forums
102: Photo Gallery
103: Community Forums
104: Downloads
105: Home
106: Downloads
107: Community Forums
108: Community Forums
109: Home
110: CPGlang
111: Home
112: Community Forums
113: Home
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Photo Gallery
119: Home
120: Photo Gallery
121: Photo Gallery
122: Home
123: Home
124: Photo Gallery
125: Community Forums
126: Member Screenshots
127: Community Forums
128: Home
129: Downloads
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Home
134: Home
135: Community Forums
136: Community Forums
137: Downloads
138: Home
139: Home
140: Community Forums
141: Home
142: Home
143: Home
144: Community Forums
145: CPGlang
146: Home
147: Community Forums
148: Home
149: Home
150: Photo Gallery
151: Home
152: Photo Gallery
153: Home
154: Photo Gallery
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Home
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: Home
165: Community Forums
166: Community Forums
167: Member Screenshots
168: Home
169: CPGlang
170: Community Forums
171: Statistics
172: Downloads
173: Photo Gallery
174: Home
175: Member Screenshots
176: Member Screenshots
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: CPGlang
180: CPGlang
181: CPGlang
182: Community Forums
183: Photo Gallery
184: Community Forums
185: Photo Gallery
186: Photo Gallery
187: Community Forums
188: Member Screenshots
189: Home
190: Photo Gallery
191: Home
192: Downloads
193: Community Forums
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Community Forums
197: Home
198: Community Forums
199: Photo Gallery
200: Home
201: Home
202: Home
203: Community Forums
204: Home
205: Downloads
206: News
207: Community Forums
208: Home
209: Downloads
210: Home
211: Photo Gallery
212: Community Forums
213: Downloads
214: Photo Gallery
215: Home
216: Community Forums
217: Statistics
218: Home
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Your Account
224: Photo Gallery
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Photo Gallery
228: Photo Gallery
229: Photo Gallery
230: Photo Gallery
231: Community Forums
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Downloads
235: Community Forums
236: Photo Gallery
237: Home
238: Community Forums
239: Home
240: Home
241: Home
242: Community Forums
243: Home
244: Home
245: Home
246: Community Forums
247: Community Forums
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Home
251: Home
252: News
253: Photo Gallery
254: Community Forums
255: Photo Gallery
256: Home
257: Community Forums
258: Photo Gallery
259: Photo Gallery
260: Your Account
261: Community Forums
262: Photo Gallery
263: Search
264: Downloads
265: Community Forums
266: Photo Gallery
267: Home
268: Downloads
269: Home
270: Community Forums
271: Community Forums
272: Community Forums
273: Home
274: Photo Gallery
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Home
278: Home
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: CPGlang
282: CPGlang
283: Home
284: Photo Gallery
285: Community Forums
286: Community Forums
287: Member Screenshots
288: Community Forums
289: Community Forums
290: Downloads
291: Photo Gallery
292: Home
293: Community Forums
294: Photo Gallery
295: Community Forums
296: Downloads
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Community Forums
300: Community Forums
301: Photo Gallery
302: Photo Gallery
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Photo Gallery
307: Home
308: Community Forums
309: Home
310: Home
311: Community Forums
312: Photo Gallery
313: Home
314: Downloads
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: Home
320: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
can't have too little spare tracks...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
panthertank
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 27, 2006
Posts: 23

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 3:43 pm
Post subject: can't have too little spare tracks...

Cool
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 5:06 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

The track was usually old stuff and used to increase the protection of the vehicle - but then again you probably knew that so this is intended for the consumption of those that didn't...

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 5:08 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

That makes them Heavy Tanks then, right? Laughing


Jeff
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 5:13 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

Razz

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Hellfish6
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 09, 2006
Posts: 151
Location: Orlando
PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 5:47 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

Was using tracks for armor effective?
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 6:50 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

An extra few inches of armour - yes it was but it was hard on the engines, transmission & suspension.

Some thought obviously went into the track mounting on the vehicle images as the way its mounted with the spuds towards the armour must provide a modicum of spaced armour effect to protect against heat/hollow charge rounds. It would have been far easier to mount it 'spuds' out.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 8:11 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

- Hellfish6
Was using tracks for armor effective?


The use of the extra track sections was two-fold. To provide additional protection and to enable the vehicle to carry additional track sections incase of damaged track.

These vehicles are taking the additional protection idea a bit too far. Taht much track per vehicle would seriously hinder mobility and possibly cause mechanical failure.

Notice that the turret on the 'Firefly' has german track mounted to it. Unusable on any allied vehicle.

Don

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:13 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

- Dontos
Notice that the turret on the 'Firefly' has german track mounted to it. Unusable on any allied vehicle.


d*mn thats it - I kept looking at that image thinking something is strange about it and couldn't quite put my finger on it... I mistakenly assumed the track was chuchill stuff.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:19 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

Those tanks must be Canadian. The Canadians were notorious for beefing up the armour on their Shermans. In Normandy Maj. Radley-Walters had 140 track links welded on his tank Caribou for an additional weight of 3.5 tonnes. This seemed to work because Caribou survived 9 hits during the campaign before it was finally knocked out on the 14th of August, 1944.

According to Radley-Walters the trick was to have the tracks only lightly welded so that they had some give. This increased the lightly hood that the shot would not bite into the armour, but would be deflected instead.

Canadians crews were not worried about the life of their drive train, or whether they could drive 500 miles or 800 hours. They just wanted to get through the next battle.

The tracks on the Firefly look like they are from a Panzer IV. I’ve seen other photos where the crews were using Tracks from Panthers, Tigers and Churchills.
Back to top
View user's profile
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:53 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

- JimWeb
- Dontos
Notice that the turret on the 'Firefly' has german track mounted to it. Unusable on any allied vehicle.


d*mn thats it - I kept looking at that image thinking something is strange about it and couldn't quite put my finger on it... I mistakenly assumed the track was chuchill stuff.

Cool


I ID'ed it only because I had to do some track repair to 'our' Marder II a few years ago, and those d*mn pins & links were a real pain to replace.

Don

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Maple_Leaf_Eh
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 517

PostPosted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 12:46 am
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

In the wouldn't that be cool department, suppose those Shermans were Rad's in the 27th Armoured Regiment (Sherbrooke Fusiliers) and suppose one of them was Bomb ....

www.convoymagazine.com...1oLjpg.jpg
Back to top
View user's profile
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 8:53 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

One also could argue just how effective tracks as extra armor really was for some thought of them as a shot trap and also the tracks themselves were made of a more brittle material than the armor it was reinforcing.


Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:33 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

What I found interesting is a Firefly and a 105mm Sherman in the same unit. I didn't think many 105mm Shermans were provided to Commonwealth units.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
J.McGillivray
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:11 pm
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

British and Canadian Armoured Regiments started to receive 105mm M4 Shermans in late 1944. There were four in each Regiment. They could have one attached to each Sqn HQ and one in the Regt. HQ, or all four could be group together as a fire support troop.
Back to top
View user's profile
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 10:30 am
Post subject: Re: can't have too little spare tracks...

- Dontos
Notice that the turret on the 'Firefly' has german track mounted to it. Unusable on any allied vehicle


Wonder whether it could be CDP (Canadian Dry Pin) tracks rather than German?



Claus B
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum