±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: cgsimpson
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6645

People Online:
Members: 1
Visitors: 313
Total: 314
Who Is Where:
 Members:
01: Rick_Eshleman > Community Forums
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Downloads
04: Community Forums
05: Downloads
06: Your Account
07: Community Forums
08: Community Forums
09: Community Forums
10: Community Forums
11: Community Forums
12: Home
13: Community Forums
14: Photo Gallery
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Downloads
18: Photo Gallery
19: Downloads
20: Downloads
21: Home
22: Downloads
23: CPGlang
24: Statistics
25: Home
26: Photo Gallery
27: Downloads
28: Community Forums
29: Home
30: Photo Gallery
31: Photo Gallery
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Photo Gallery
35: Photo Gallery
36: Community Forums
37: Home
38: Home
39: Community Forums
40: Community Forums
41: Home
42: Home
43: Community Forums
44: Home
45: Community Forums
46: Home
47: Downloads
48: Community Forums
49: Community Forums
50: Home
51: CPGlang
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Home
55: Downloads
56: Community Forums
57: Member Screenshots
58: Photo Gallery
59: Home
60: Home
61: Home
62: Downloads
63: Home
64: Community Forums
65: Community Forums
66: Home
67: Community Forums
68: Community Forums
69: Downloads
70: Photo Gallery
71: Home
72: Downloads
73: Community Forums
74: Home
75: Community Forums
76: Community Forums
77: Home
78: Community Forums
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Member Screenshots
83: Community Forums
84: Member Screenshots
85: Community Forums
86: CPGlang
87: Photo Gallery
88: Community Forums
89: Community Forums
90: Member Screenshots
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Community Forums
96: Photo Gallery
97: Home
98: Downloads
99: Community Forums
100: Photo Gallery
101: Downloads
102: News Archive
103: Community Forums
104: Photo Gallery
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Member Screenshots
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Photo Gallery
112: CPGlang
113: Home
114: Community Forums
115: Downloads
116: Home
117: Home
118: Community Forums
119: Home
120: Community Forums
121: Home
122: Home
123: Community Forums
124: Home
125: Community Forums
126: CPGlang
127: Community Forums
128: Community Forums
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Home
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: CPGlang
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Community Forums
140: Home
141: Home
142: CPGlang
143: Home
144: Community Forums
145: Home
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Downloads
149: Home
150: Home
151: Community Forums
152: Home
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Home
156: Photo Gallery
157: Your Account
158: Photo Gallery
159: CPGlang
160: Home
161: Photo Gallery
162: Community Forums
163: Member Screenshots
164: Photo Gallery
165: Community Forums
166: Home
167: Home
168: Community Forums
169: Home
170: Home
171: Home
172: Home
173: Community Forums
174: Downloads
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Home
180: Home
181: Community Forums
182: Home
183: Community Forums
184: CPGlang
185: Home
186: Home
187: Downloads
188: Photo Gallery
189: Community Forums
190: Community Forums
191: Home
192: Community Forums
193: Home
194: Community Forums
195: Member Screenshots
196: Community Forums
197: Photo Gallery
198: Community Forums
199: Photo Gallery
200: Community Forums
201: Photo Gallery
202: Photo Gallery
203: Member Screenshots
204: Downloads
205: Community Forums
206: Home
207: Photo Gallery
208: Community Forums
209: Home
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Downloads
214: Home
215: Downloads
216: Photo Gallery
217: Community Forums
218: Home
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Downloads
223: Downloads
224: Downloads
225: Community Forums
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: Downloads
230: Home
231: Community Forums
232: Home
233: Home
234: Community Forums
235: Photo Gallery
236: Home
237: Downloads
238: Home
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Home
244: Community Forums
245: CPGlang
246: Home
247: Home
248: Downloads
249: Community Forums
250: Community Forums
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: Home
256: Community Forums
257: Home
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Home
261: Community Forums
262: CPGlang
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Downloads
267: Community Forums
268: Home
269: Member Screenshots
270: Home
271: CPGlang
272: Home
273: CPGlang
274: Community Forums
275: Home
276: Home
277: Community Forums
278: Home
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Community Forums
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Community Forums
285: Home
286: Home
287: Home
288: Community Forums
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Downloads
292: Community Forums
293: Community Forums
294: Home
295: Member Screenshots
296: Community Forums
297: Downloads
298: Member Screenshots
299: Photo Gallery
300: Downloads
301: Home
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: CPGlang
307: Downloads
308: Member Screenshots
309: Home
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Home
313: Photo Gallery

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Never seen this one before....
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:08 am
Post subject: Never seen this one before....

Found this photo while surfing around. Never seen this before.



FYI
Don

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 5:59 am
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

Hi Don! Hi Folks!

Doesn't surprise me. The Marines are always looking for something a bit smaller that what the Army uses so their helicopters have more range when airlifting.

I wonder if by chance, that vehicle will fit inside a CH-53 or maybe a V-22?
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:06 am
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

Its a Gelandewagen - plenty of images on JED

www.jedsite.info/trans...eries.html

MerecedesBenz manufacture - its the first IFAV I've seen with a TOW mount though.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
oldertop
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 20, 2006
Posts: 76

PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:59 am
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

Ya..its the Corps Mercedes "SUV," theres a row of them sitting in a lot at Camp Lejeune. It seems the Corps still had not at the time they put these "tincan" fighting vehicles in service lerned the differance between a fighting vehicle and just another bad idea. The first thing they (the USMC) found out was that when engaged in a fight the personnel in the front seats were dead ducks....so they remove the front doors to allow the personnel a chance to bail out ..Oh they also forgot the the vehicle has no armor so the bullets just go through one side (and who ever is inside) and out the other, and the maint of these vehicles was contracted out side the Corps. And no it won't fit in a V-22, one thing the Corps forgot to mention during the hipe campaign for the V-22 was there wasn't a single vehicle in the inventory that would fit in this aircraft....So without calling to much attention the corps has let a contract out for the development of a vehicle that will fit inside...oh and the total lifting cap. of the V-22 is 10,000 lbs. so we now know it won't be a fighting vehicle huh.
Back to top
View user's profile
L.Delsing
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 10, 2006
Posts: 960

PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:44 pm
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

Looks like the good old MB290. In the early days of the air mobile brigade over here they used also MB290s with TOWs.

IIRC they are now replaced by LSVs with Gills.

BTW is it normal on ranges that you don't use camo, hessian etc?
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 4:07 pm
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

I think these should be replaced by the new Internally Transportable Vehicles (ITV):

hqinet001.hqmc.usmc.mi...ehicle.pdf



Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 8:29 pm
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

- oldertop
Ya..its the Corps Mercedes "SUV," theres a row of them sitting in a lot at Camp Lejeune. It seems the Corps still had not at the time they put these "tincan" fighting vehicles in service lerned the differance between a fighting vehicle and just another bad idea. The first thing they (the USMC) found out was that when engaged in a fight the personnel in the front seats were dead ducks....so they remove the front doors to allow the personnel a chance to bail out ..Oh they also forgot the the vehicle has no armor so the bullets just go through one side (and who ever is inside) and out the other, and the maint of these vehicles was contracted out side the Corps. And no it won't fit in a V-22, one thing the Corps forgot to mention during the hipe campaign for the V-22 was there wasn't a single vehicle in the inventory that would fit in this aircraft....So without calling to much attention the corps has let a contract out for the development of a vehicle that will fit inside...oh and the total lifting cap. of the V-22 is 10,000 lbs. so we now know it won't be a fighting vehicle huh.


IFAV served the same purpose as its predecessors and its replacement as a fast attack vehicle - it isn't and never was intended to stand there and slog it out hence the lack of armour.

As for the Osprey thing - the IFAV fits in the CH-46 Sea Knight, CH-53 Sea Stallion and the Osprey. In the case of the Osprey its was one of the design criteria.

Just added some more images to JED.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 8:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

Jim,
You mean the ITV would fit in the -46, 53 and V-22 right? According to the pdf, the IFAV can fit in a -53, but not a V-22.

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
oldertop
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 20, 2006
Posts: 76

PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:37 pm
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

Ya all it needs is to have a top speed of 2,000+ fps so it can out run the bullets,Its listed as a fighting vehicle so what kind of fight will it get into...snowballs! If this vehicle is used on patrols they'll need a spoon and plastic bag to pick up whats left of the crew, it does not fit in a V-22's cargo area and thats why theres a development contract for a new vehicle, the "Globe" announced the development contract two months ago . Have you ever seen the cargo space of the V-22 (and yes I have as well as been in one) and theres no way in hell you'er going to get that SUV in it, its a damn tight fit for 18 combat ready troopers as it is.
As for this vehicles predecessor (remember its the Marine Corps) they had brought back the M151 (someone saw to many "The Desert Rats" TV shows) , but the U.S. Navy was madder than hell about it because once again they would have't have gasoline storage for these vehicles on they'er landing support ships, what finely killed off the M151s was the parts shortage (there was none in the system).
I'll bet someone will come up with the well used quote " this vehicle was never designed to go near the front lines", and the answer to that is "this nation hasn't fought a war with a frontline in 35 years!"
As for the dimension of the V22 (given 5.10 ft.) what hey don't mention is that its "T" shaped with the smaller with dimensions at the lower section.


Last edited by oldertop on Tue Oct 24, 2006 11:10 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 11:02 pm
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

The maximum width of a G-wagen is 5.6 - the minimum cargo area width of an Osprey is 5.10 tight yes but still feasible.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
oldertop
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Oct 20, 2006
Posts: 76

PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 11:11 pm
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

then why let a development contract?
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 6:08 am
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

Hi Jim! Hi Folks!

- JimWeb

As for the Osprey thing - the IFAV fits in the CH-46 Sea Knight, CH-53 Sea Stallion and the Osprey.


If the IFAV(G-wagon) fits, then why does the USMC Concepts + Programs 2005 pdf say: "The Interim Fast Attack Vehicle is currently fielded and is deployable inside the CH-53 aircraft, but the GCE currently has no (<<<<<?????) ground mobility platform that can deploy inside (<<<<<<?????) the MV-22."

I read that to mean the IFAV (G-wagon) does NOT fit inside a MV-22.

- JimWeb

In the case of the Osprey its was one of the design criteria.


I understand the ITV (mini-M151) was designed to fit inside the MV-22. Are you saying the IFAV(G-wagon) was picked because it would fit inside the MV-22?

Very confuzed. Confused
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 6:21 am
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

No actually what I am working my way round to saying is the USMC would probably have their funding for the new vehicle cut or removed if, officially, the IFAV did fit in the Osprey.

Do you follow my reasoning?

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 6:57 am
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

Hi Odertop! Hi Folks!

- oldertop

Ya all it needs is to have a top speed of 2,000+ fps so it can out run the bullets,Its listed as a fighting vehicle so what kind of fight will it get into...snowballs! If this vehicle is used on patrols they'll need a spoon and plastic bag to pick up whats left of the crew, ...
.....As for this vehicles predecessor (remember its the Marine Corps) they had brought back the M151 (someone saw to many "The Desert Rats" TV shows) , .....
.....I'll bet someone will come up with the well used quote " this vehicle was never designed to go near the front lines", .....


I see the IFAV(G-wagon) as the newest version of the WW II gun jeep where Scouts armed with machine guns and light mortars leading the main force units. The Army has deployed Scouts with light wheeled vehicles ever sense the first jeeps. It wasn't until the M1114 uparmored Hummer was fielded that scouts had a wheeled vehicle with some armor. A vehicle that, do to it's large size, many claim is the wrong type of vehicle for scouts.

I agree that this type of vehicle is a bit new to the Corps and I am not sure just what the plan is for them. But then I am still trying to understand why the Corps has four light armored recon battalions using 8x8 armored cars.

My guess is those light wheeled vehicles will be used on patrols (and scouting missions) and the crews and their leadership will taking on much more than snowballs. Just like Army Scouts have been sense WWII. Nothing new about using none armored wheeled vehicles in a shooting match.

"The Desert Rats" TV show is good entainment. All Scouts get a good laugh watching a jeep with a machine gun take out a M47 medium tank. Lesson to be learned is NEVER try that in real shooting match.

As for someone claiming those vehicles where not designed to go near a front line, that's true! They are designed to be airlifted over and dropped behind the front lines. Wink

The Marines are changing, hopefully they will be able to put the right mix of riflemen and supporting equipment together for the next mission.
Sgt, Scouts Out! Smile

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 2:17 pm
Post subject: Re: Never seen this one before....

This is quite a different photo.

Found it in a newsletter from a Texas Military site. Lost the link, but printed up a couple of pages with interesting photos. I'll dig up the link and post it.




Edit: I found it. Here is the link: Texas Military Museum Newsletter

Don

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum