±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 357
Total: 357
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Home
03: Photo Gallery
04: Member Screenshots
05: Home
06: Photo Gallery
07: News Archive
08: Home
09: Photo Gallery
10: Downloads
11: Photo Gallery
12: Downloads
13: Home
14: Community Forums
15: Downloads
16: Community Forums
17: Community Forums
18: Member Screenshots
19: Home
20: Home
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: Photo Gallery
26: Member Screenshots
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Downloads
30: Home
31: Community Forums
32: Home
33: Photo Gallery
34: Photo Gallery
35: Photo Gallery
36: Photo Gallery
37: Statistics
38: Community Forums
39: Home
40: Home
41: Photo Gallery
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Home
45: Community Forums
46: Member Screenshots
47: Home
48: Photo Gallery
49: News Archive
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Downloads
53: Community Forums
54: Photo Gallery
55: Photo Gallery
56: Community Forums
57: Downloads
58: Photo Gallery
59: Downloads
60: Community Forums
61: Home
62: Community Forums
63: Downloads
64: Community Forums
65: Photo Gallery
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Downloads
69: Downloads
70: Photo Gallery
71: Community Forums
72: Photo Gallery
73: Home
74: Photo Gallery
75: Photo Gallery
76: Home
77: Downloads
78: Community Forums
79: Community Forums
80: Home
81: Community Forums
82: Member Screenshots
83: Home
84: Home
85: Community Forums
86: Photo Gallery
87: Member Screenshots
88: Photo Gallery
89: Home
90: Community Forums
91: Member Screenshots
92: Member Screenshots
93: Member Screenshots
94: Photo Gallery
95: Community Forums
96: News Archive
97: Community Forums
98: Photo Gallery
99: Community Forums
100: Home
101: Community Forums
102: Home
103: Downloads
104: Home
105: Downloads
106: Community Forums
107: Home
108: Member Screenshots
109: Community Forums
110: Home
111: Home
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Home
115: Home
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Home
119: Community Forums
120: Statistics
121: Home
122: Member Screenshots
123: Statistics
124: Photo Gallery
125: Home
126: Downloads
127: Photo Gallery
128: Photo Gallery
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Photo Gallery
132: Member Screenshots
133: Community Forums
134: Photo Gallery
135: Statistics
136: Home
137: Home
138: Home
139: Photo Gallery
140: Member Screenshots
141: Statistics
142: LinkToUs
143: Home
144: Member Screenshots
145: Community Forums
146: Home
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Member Screenshots
150: Community Forums
151: Photo Gallery
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Home
155: Community Forums
156: Home
157: Community Forums
158: Photo Gallery
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Home
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: Downloads
166: Photo Gallery
167: Community Forums
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Home
171: Community Forums
172: Photo Gallery
173: Member Screenshots
174: Home
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Home
180: Community Forums
181: Home
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Photo Gallery
186: Member Screenshots
187: Community Forums
188: Member Screenshots
189: News Archive
190: Community Forums
191: Community Forums
192: Downloads
193: Downloads
194: Community Forums
195: Photo Gallery
196: Community Forums
197: Community Forums
198: Home
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Photo Gallery
202: Photo Gallery
203: Community Forums
204: Member Screenshots
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Home
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Downloads
211: Home
212: Member Screenshots
213: Home
214: Home
215: Member Screenshots
216: Home
217: Community Forums
218: Photo Gallery
219: Photo Gallery
220: Photo Gallery
221: Photo Gallery
222: Photo Gallery
223: Community Forums
224: Member Screenshots
225: Home
226: Photo Gallery
227: Member Screenshots
228: Home
229: Photo Gallery
230: Home
231: Community Forums
232: Member Screenshots
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Home
236: Community Forums
237: Home
238: Photo Gallery
239: Photo Gallery
240: Statistics
241: Photo Gallery
242: Home
243: Community Forums
244: Member Screenshots
245: Member Screenshots
246: Photo Gallery
247: Member Screenshots
248: Your Account
249: Photo Gallery
250: News
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Home
254: Photo Gallery
255: Home
256: Statistics
257: Community Forums
258: Home
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Home
262: Home
263: Community Forums
264: Community Forums
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Photo Gallery
269: Member Screenshots
270: Community Forums
271: Community Forums
272: Home
273: Community Forums
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Member Screenshots
278: Community Forums
279: Home
280: Community Forums
281: Member Screenshots
282: Community Forums
283: Community Forums
284: Photo Gallery
285: Community Forums
286: Downloads
287: Community Forums
288: Photo Gallery
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Photo Gallery
292: Community Forums
293: Community Forums
294: Member Screenshots
295: Home
296: Community Forums
297: Home
298: Statistics
299: Community Forums
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Member Screenshots
303: Photo Gallery
304: Member Screenshots
305: Home
306: Community Forums
307: Photo Gallery
308: Community Forums
309: Photo Gallery
310: Community Forums
311: Home
312: Home
313: Home
314: Community Forums
315: Downloads
316: Home
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: Photo Gallery
320: Home
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Photo Gallery
324: Community Forums
325: Home
326: Home
327: News Archive
328: Downloads
329: Home
330: Community Forums
331: Community Forums
332: Home
333: Photo Gallery
334: Community Forums
335: Downloads
336: Photo Gallery
337: Community Forums
338: Community Forums
339: Community Forums
340: Statistics
341: Home
342: Member Screenshots
343: News Archive
344: Home
345: Downloads
346: Community Forums
347: Downloads
348: Community Forums
349: Home
350: Community Forums
351: Community Forums
352: Member Screenshots
353: Community Forums
354: Community Forums
355: Member Screenshots
356: Home
357: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Stu, StuG 40 and StuG III
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 7:20 pm
Post subject: Stu, StuG 40 and StuG III

Hello everybody,

I just finished the biggest of the work concerning surviving panzers I to VI, but I'm confronted to some difficulties with a significative variant of the Panzer III : the Sturmgeschütz.
I just can't make the difference between the StuG 40 and the StuG III. I've read many articles on the web, which explains one thing and its opposite.. So, is there any chance to be able to recognize a StuG 40 from a StuG III by only seeing a photo of it?

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
armyjunk2
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 22, 2006
Posts: 1416

PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 8:01 pm
Post subject: Re: Stu, StuG 40 and StuG III

Hello, Do you have a copy of German Tanks of World War II by von Senger und Eetterlin? He says the the cupola towards the rear is the main difference. but the short gun or howitzer is a give away also. hope this is of some help....I can scan the pages for you.........AJ2
Back to top
View user's profile
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 12:42 am
Post subject: Re: Stu, StuG 40 and StuG III

The number "40" indicates that the vehicle is a Sturmgeschutz III with the longer Sturmkanone 40.

It pertains only to F, F/8 and G models with the long gun.


Jeff
Back to top
View user's profile
armyjunk2
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Sep 22, 2006
Posts: 1416

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 2:49 am
Post subject: Re: Stu, StuG 40 and StuG III

German Tanks of World War II list the following variants
later ones seem to have the cupola

7.5cm StuK L24 (Sd Kfz 142)
10.5cm StuH 42 L28.3 (Sd Kfz 142/2)
7.5cm StuK 40 L/48 (Sd Kfz 142/1)
7.5cm KwK L/3 (Sd Kfz 142)
7.5cm StuK L/40 L/43(Sd Kfz 142/1)

I think I would put all of them together in one PDF, thats how I file them
Back to top
View user's profile
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:44 am
Post subject: Re: Stu, StuG 40 and StuG III

All Sturmgeschutz III's with the cupola are the G models ... regardless of what gun they have. If they carry the L/43 or the L/48 (long gun), it is a StuG 40.

Any Sturmgeschutz III with the shorter gun are referred to as the StuH 42, or officially a Sturmhaubitze.




Jeff
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 1:29 pm
Post subject: Re: Stu, StuG 40 and StuG III

- JeffStringer

Any Sturmgeschutz III with the shorter gun are referred to as the StuH 42, or officially a Sturmhaubitze.




Jeff


I'm not sure I agree with this. I think a vehicle with the 75mm L24 would be a StuG not a StuH. I thought the StuH designation was only those vehicles with the 105mm weapon.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
JeffStringer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 637

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 2:41 pm
Post subject: Re: Stu, StuG 40 and StuG III

You're right Bob. I guess I got a little ahead of myself on that one.

But all III's with the long gun were referrred to as the StuG 40.


Jeff
Back to top
View user's profile
Dontos
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3436
Location: Vine Grove, KY
PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 5:45 pm
Post subject: Re: Stu, StuG 40 and StuG III

I was under the impression that

StuG or Sturmgeschutz was an assault gun

and

StuH or Sturmhaubitz was assault artillery.

The primary determining factor was the gun caliber not the length of the gun tube.

Don

_________________
"Gonna hold my breath until Armor returns home..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger Photo Gallery
T26E4
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Apr 14, 2006
Posts: 42

PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 7:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Stu, StuG 40 and StuG III

The StuH had a 10.5cm Howitzer -- that's what made it a Sturmhaubitze -- not just because its weapon had a 10.5cm weapon versus the 7.5cm L/24, L/43 or L/48 tank cannon of the Sturmgeschutzen.
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 2:29 pm
Post subject: Re: Stu, StuG 40 and StuG III

I just got the answer, and it's quite complicated...

The official denomination for the StuG III with the 7,5 cm long barrel was first StuG 40, because it carry the gun SturmKanone (StuK) 40, which can be L/43 or L/48 (that is to say, the shell rotates 43 or 48 times in the barrel, that depends of the grooves and of the length of the barrel. This rotation provides more stability to the shell). That is right for the models Ausf. F, F/8 and G. The models Ausf. A to E (7,5 cm short barrel) were then called StuG III.

You can find StuG 40 Ausf. G with or without the Saukopf, it doesn't matters.

But when appeared the Sturmgeschütz IV (based on a PzKpfw IV hull), all the StuG 40 were renamed StuG III, so that they could easily be differentiated from the new StuG IV. So, you can find the same denomination for different vehicles, which makes it a bit complicated.

You also have a variant with the 10.5 cm Howitzer, which is called 10,5 cm Sturmhaubitze or StuH 42.

Notica that the primary role of the StuG III was to be an assault gun. Then it was (successfully !!) used as a tank destoyer when the StuK 40 gun was introduced.

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 5:04 pm
Post subject: Re: Stu, StuG 40 and StuG III

- the_shadock
I just got the answer, and it's quite complicated...

The official denomination for the StuG III with the 7,5 cm long barrel was first StuG 40, because it carry the gun SturmKanone (StuK) 40, which can be L/43 or L/48 (that is to say, the shell rotates 43 or 48 times in the barrel, that depends of the grooves and of the length of the barrel. This rotation provides more stability to the shell). That is right for the models Ausf. F, F/8 and G. The models Ausf. A to E (7,5 cm short barrel) were then called StuG III.

P-O


Huh?? I thought the 'L numbers' designated the length of the barrel in calibers? It has something to do with the number of rotations the round makes? So does this mean that the 75 L70 of the Panther and the Jagd Pz IV is designated that because the round rotates 70 times in the barrel??

I've got to think about this. I'm curious about the source.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 5:22 pm
Post subject: Re: Stu, StuG 40 and StuG III

In fact, Bob, you're right. I wrote this text, having read this principle of rotation 'somewhere' (don't remind where exactly) without verifying if it was right or wrong.. So the L is length of the barrel in calibers, and it doesn't depends of the number of rotations of the shell in the barrel... thanks to correct me

P-O

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 9:20 pm
Post subject: Re: Stu, StuG 40 and StuG III

No problem. You had me worried for a while. L numbers have been one of the core measurements that help explain the differences in things like why the Panther and 17 pder were so much better than the base Sherman as antitank weapons. You had me worried there was something I had missed all these years :-). But that is what I like about this group, folks ask for explanations in a moderately polite manner and get reasonable responses or good discussions in return.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
clausb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 25, 2006
Posts: 146

PostPosted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:30 am
Post subject: Re: Stu, StuG 40 and StuG III

- the_shadock
I just got the answer, and it's quite complicated...


Nah, it is not that bad compared with the designation mess of some other vehicles, particularily the whole Jagdpanzer/Sturmgeschütz/Panzerjäger debacle that sprung from the bureacratic infighting between the Generalinspectorates of Artillery and that of the Panzertruppe Smile

- the_shadock
The official denomination for the StuG III with the 7,5 cm long barrel was first StuG 40, because it carry the gun SturmKanone (StuK) 40,

<SNIP>

That is right for the models Ausf. F, F/8 and G. The models Ausf. A to E (7,5 cm short barrel) were then called StuG III.

You can find StuG 40 Ausf. G with or without the Saukopf, it doesn't matters.

But when appeared the Sturmgeschütz IV (based on a PzKpfw IV hull), all the StuG 40 were renamed StuG III, so that they could easily be differentiated from the new StuG IV. So, you can find the same denomination for different vehicles, which makes it a bit complicated.

You also have a variant with the 10.5 cm Howitzer, which is called 10,5 cm Sturmhaubitze or StuH 42.


I'm not sure what your source is for this, but to some extent is clashes with what Jentz has to say in his Osprey volumes on this vehicle. As far as I can make out, the story goes like this:

Officially, all StuGs until some point in 1943 were designated "gepanzerte Selbstfahrlafette für Sturmgeschütz" (armoured selfpropelled chassis for assault gun). This was then qualified by adding the designation of the weapon it carried and the mark of the vehicle, so an Ausf. E with the short 7,5cm StuK 37 would be :

"gepanzerte Selbstfahrlafette für Sturmgeschütz 7,5cm Kanone Ausf. E"

When the long 7,5cm gun entered the picture early in 1942, the official designation was:

"gepanzerte Selbstfahrlafette für Sturmgeschütz 7,5cm Sturmkanone 40 Ausf. F"

My guess would be that the StuG 40 designation came about when some beancounter needed a way to discern between the abbreviation previously used for the vehicle armed with the short-barreled 7,5cm - "StuG" - and the new ones armed with the longer 7,5cm gun and so coined the phrase "StuG 40".
Something similar appears to have happened in the case of the Panzer III, where a Panzer III was just PzIII to begin with, then they became PzIII(37) and PzIII(5) when the short 5cm gun arrived, then PzIII(5kz) and PzIII(5lg) (kz = kurz= short, lg=lang=long) and finally PzIII(75) when the Panzer III Ausf. N arrived with the short 7,5cm gun.

Anyway, in late 1942, the 10,5cm Sturmhaubitze was mounted in the StuG but I haven't found any early designation for that vehicle, other than "Sturmgeschütz leichte Feldhaubitze" that was used in the project phase back in 1941.

Now, early in 1943, enter the vehicle affectionately known as the "Brummbär", a Panzer IV with a tall, box-like superstructure mounting a short 15cm howitzer. Now there were StuG-type vehicles based on both the Panzer III and Panzer IV and someone apparently decided to clean up the designations. So, the vehicle previously known as

"gepanzerte Selbstfahrlafette für Sturmgeschütz 7,5cm Sturmkanone 40 Ausf. F" (or F/8 or G)

became simply

"Sturmgeschütz III für 7,5cm StuK 40 L/48"

The howitzer armed vehicle became

"Sturmgeschütz III für 10,5cm StuHaub 42"

while the Panzer IV based "Brummbär" became the

"Sturmgeschütz IV für 15cm StuHaub 43"

When the Alkett factory was bombed in late 1943 and StuG production ground to a halt, StuG superstructures were mounted on Panzer IV hulls at the Krupp factory, producing the

"Sturmgeschütz IV für 7,5cm Stuk 40 L/48"

It would seem that by 1944, that got a tad too confusing as well, the "Sturmgeschütz III für 10,5cm StuHaub 42" becomming the "Sturmhaubitze" and the "Sturmgeschütz IV für 15cm StuHaub 43" becomming the "Sturmpanzer", but I cannot follow that debacle in my sources.

The crux of the matter is, as with all German AFV designations, that they are dynamic and subject to change. New designations will be created and retrofitted to older designs, some agencies will coin their own designations suiting their particular purpose (tabulating strength returns, for example) or bureaucratic powerstruggles will expand into the area of naming and concepts. Furthermore, perhaps not everybody will get the message and change the designations in their correspondance until long after it has officially changed.

If I was you, I'd simply forget about official designations and use something we can all understand and follow Smile

Claus B
Back to top
View user's profile
the_shadock
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: May 27, 2006
Posts: 2865
Location: Normandy, France
PostPosted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 11:22 am
Post subject: Re: Stu, StuG 40 and StuG III

- clausb


I'm not sure what your source is for this, but to some extent is clashes with what Jentz has to say in his Osprey volumes on this vehicle.


I tried to summarize and make simple different infos I got on websites and on military-related magazines.. my goal was to provide basic infos on my website, but not to write stupid or incorrect things. The problem is that, on this particular subject, everybody says one thing and its opposite...

- clausb

If I was you, I'd simply forget about official designations and use something we can all understand and follow Smile

Claus B


You are entirely right, that's what I will do. However, I just try to understand why we can find all those denominations. What you explain enlighten the complexity of the subjects. Maybe I have to let that to specialists.. Wink

Pierre-Olivier

_________________
soldat_ryan @ hotmail.com

Looking for photos of Sherman manufacturer's plates
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum