±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 310
Total: 310
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Photo Gallery
02: Community Forums
03: News
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Your Account
09: Community Forums
10: Member Screenshots
11: Home
12: Community Forums
13: Home
14: Community Forums
15: Home
16: Home
17: Home
18: Your Account
19: Community Forums
20: Community Forums
21: Home
22: Community Forums
23: Home
24: Community Forums
25: Community Forums
26: Your Account
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Home
30: Community Forums
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Member Screenshots
36: Home
37: Home
38: Home
39: Photo Gallery
40: Community Forums
41: Home
42: Home
43: Home
44: Home
45: Home
46: Community Forums
47: Home
48: Home
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Home
52: Photo Gallery
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Home
57: Community Forums
58: Home
59: Home
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Photo Gallery
63: Community Forums
64: Home
65: Home
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Downloads
69: Community Forums
70: Home
71: Community Forums
72: News
73: Your Account
74: Home
75: Home
76: Downloads
77: Home
78: Home
79: Home
80: Home
81: Community Forums
82: Home
83: Home
84: Home
85: Downloads
86: Photo Gallery
87: Community Forums
88: Home
89: Community Forums
90: Community Forums
91: Downloads
92: Downloads
93: Community Forums
94: Home
95: Home
96: Home
97: Community Forums
98: Home
99: Home
100: Home
101: Home
102: Community Forums
103: Photo Gallery
104: News Archive
105: Home
106: Your Account
107: Community Forums
108: Home
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Home
112: Community Forums
113: Community Forums
114: Community Forums
115: Your Account
116: Community Forums
117: Home
118: Your Account
119: Downloads
120: Home
121: Home
122: Home
123: Community Forums
124: Member Screenshots
125: Home
126: Home
127: Home
128: Home
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Member Screenshots
133: Downloads
134: Community Forums
135: Home
136: Home
137: Home
138: Home
139: Your Account
140: Community Forums
141: Photo Gallery
142: Home
143: Home
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Home
149: Community Forums
150: Downloads
151: Community Forums
152: Photo Gallery
153: Photo Gallery
154: Home
155: Home
156: Community Forums
157: Home
158: Community Forums
159: Home
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Photo Gallery
163: Community Forums
164: Home
165: Home
166: Home
167: Home
168: Community Forums
169: Photo Gallery
170: Home
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: Home
174: Photo Gallery
175: Community Forums
176: Community Forums
177: Home
178: Home
179: Photo Gallery
180: Community Forums
181: Home
182: Community Forums
183: Home
184: Home
185: Community Forums
186: Home
187: Community Forums
188: Your Account
189: Home
190: Community Forums
191: Home
192: Community Forums
193: Home
194: Home
195: Home
196: Member Screenshots
197: News Archive
198: Home
199: Supporters
200: Community Forums
201: Home
202: Home
203: Member Screenshots
204: Home
205: Community Forums
206: News Archive
207: Community Forums
208: Community Forums
209: Community Forums
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Downloads
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Home
222: Home
223: Home
224: Home
225: Home
226: Home
227: Home
228: Community Forums
229: Home
230: Photo Gallery
231: Downloads
232: Home
233: Home
234: Home
235: Community Forums
236: Photo Gallery
237: Community Forums
238: Home
239: Community Forums
240: Community Forums
241: Home
242: Home
243: Home
244: Community Forums
245: Home
246: Home
247: Home
248: Home
249: Home
250: Community Forums
251: Home
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Home
255: Community Forums
256: Home
257: News
258: Home
259: Home
260: Member Screenshots
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Community Forums
264: Home
265: Community Forums
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Home
270: Member Screenshots
271: News Archive
272: Community Forums
273: Home
274: Home
275: Community Forums
276: Photo Gallery
277: Home
278: Community Forums
279: Community Forums
280: Home
281: Home
282: Home
283: Member Screenshots
284: Home
285: Community Forums
286: Home
287: News
288: Community Forums
289: Home
290: Home
291: Home
292: Community Forums
293: Home
294: Community Forums
295: Downloads
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Community Forums
300: Community Forums
301: Home
302: Member Screenshots
303: Community Forums
304: Home
305: Community Forums
306: Community Forums
307: Community Forums
308: Photo Gallery
309: Community Forums
310: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
New one to ID, but not armor.....
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 2:50 am
Post subject: New one to ID, but not armor.....


OK you armor-holics, ID this one! I thought I'd seen some odd stuff at Ft Eustis's museum but this takes the cake. It came in a magazine I recieve monthly. To look at it, I never would have thought that it would even be feasible to use this thing for military purposes. The "APG" on the front, I assume means Aberdeen Proving Grounds. I have the complete history on this vehicle but I'd like to see who has an idea before I give up the answer. Hack off the front wheel and it looks like something a "military Santa" might pull with 8 reindeer, (9 with Rudolph, haha). It just needs a mortar mounted in the back....

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Cloudy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 06, 2006
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 4:30 am
Post subject: Re: New one to ID, but not armor.....

How about the "Davis Personnel Carrier"?
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:05 am
Post subject: Re: New one to ID, but not armor.....

'Davis Car' would be more accurate - built by a Gary Davis from Van Nuys California around 1949

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 1:48 pm
Post subject: Re: New one to ID, but not armor.....

If anything, it looks like it would have been even less stable in a turn than an M151...if that's possible.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 4:38 pm
Post subject: Re: New one to ID, but not armor.....

okay, further explanation is required, jimweb et. al, what was the purpose of the 'davis car'.
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 5:21 pm
Post subject: Re: New one to ID, but not armor.....

I think I saw that thing pictured in an old 'Wheels and Tracks" issue from sometime back last century.
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 8:31 pm
Post subject: Re: New one to ID, but not armor.....

- SHAWN
okay, further explanation is required, jimweb et. al, what was the purpose of the 'davis car'.


Near as I can figure out it was a lightweight vehicle for use in the jungle. The reason it failed its tests was that it was near impossible to steer when in a rutted track ( pretty common in jungles & other combat zones ) because the front single wheel would be up on the 'hump' between ruts.

However its manouverability on flat hard surfaces was noted and the principle was adopted for vehicles on aircraft carriers and later three-wheeler jeeps were used for jobs like aircraft starters, fire engines etc

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 9:34 pm
Post subject: Re: New one to ID, but not armor.....

To add to the confusion is that there was a '47 civilian "Davis Car" that was a trike in the classic (not Morgan) sense that seated 2-4...very aero. Fewer than 20 were built. Looks like a watermelon seed sports car.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Cloudy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 06, 2006
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 1:10 am
Post subject: Re: New one to ID, but not armor.....

Having had a number of misadventures aboard 3 wheeler ATC's, I'd be rather dubious of the stability in a sudden turn...
Back to top
View user's profile
SFC_Jeff_Button
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1311
Location: Ft Hood, TX
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:04 am
Post subject: Re: New one to ID, but not armor.....

Here is the complete description of this vehicle as it appears in Off-Road magazine, which is an awsome mag if I do say so myself;

Historians have affixed many labels to automobile entrepreneur Gary Davis. May of you are probably saying, “Who the heck is Gary Davis?� Well, the guy made a pretty big splash in his day, especially considering he built scarcely more than a double handful of cars and three utility vehicles. It’s a story that rivals that of the Tucker car. Like the irrepressible Preston Tucker, Davis has been known as a visionary and a crackpot. An idea man and a crook. An innovative designer and a desperado. Nearly 60 years later, who can tell for sure what went on in the mind of the man who tried to change the “common knowledge� that cars had to have four wheels.

Davis had become a successful car salesman in Southern California in the late 1930s and had many contacts in the car world there. Even then, SoCal was a car-crazy place. When World War II ended, those sentiments were heightened because of gas and rubber rationing. Most of all, there had been no new cars since 1942! Looking to capitalize on the public’s car-hunger, Gary began the Davis Motor Car Company in 1946, eventually moving the company into a 57,000 square foot former aircraft factory in Van Nuys.

How did Davis get fixated on three wheelers? Most likely from the acquisition of a V8 powered 3-wheel car built in 1941 for an extravagant millionaire by the legendary custom and race car builder, Frank Kurtis. Davis hired engineers, designers and craftsmen to create three-wheeled cars, promising double the normal wages when the company took off... as it was certain to do, so he assured. A couple of prototypes and then a small number of pre-production models, called the Divan (model D-2), were built into 1948 and that’s when the trouble began.

Workers were not being paid. The 300 paid franchisees across the U.S. were not getting cars. The over $1.2 million raised had evaporated and Davis was soon under investigation for fraud and civil suits were filed. By May of 1950, all the assets of the company were sold and Davis himself was convicted of grand theft and sentenced to two years in prison.

left)The military probably approved of the typical Spartan “numbutt� interior. The Davis was more roomy than the GI Jeep because it was wider inside. It was obvious the ergonomics mirrored the GI Jeep.(right) The front suspension actually worked well. It used a pair of coil springs mounted under the chassis and connected to the “u-arm� by a vertical link. A pair of tube shocks were used and a standard steering box. The wheel has a hydraulic brake. The ride quality of the Davis is superb. The rear used a pair of standard leaf springs. The rear axle was a semi-float Dana 23 with 4.10 gears.

In the latter days of the turmoil, before the company assets were seized, Davis managed to convince government officials to test a stripped Davis with a jeep-like body for military service. Called the model 494X, it used the same basic chassis as the D-2 but with a utility body that could carry five passengers. Maneuverability and utility were the key features noted in the brochure.

Three prototypes were built, reportedly in only a week. At least one, and possibly two were sent to the Army’s Aberdeen Proving Grounds for tests in April of 1949. Film footage exists showing a Davis being tested against a standard military jeep and the off-road results were laughable. Predictably, the low clearance and single, undriven front wheel were the primary causes of its poor performance in the dirt.

On-road performance was deemed good, particularly ride quality. The vehicle was stable to a top speed of 70mph and delivered fuel economy in the 20- plus MPG range. In 400 miles of tests, the three-wheeler took a hard beating at the hands of the Army. While the report was generally favorable for a vehicle of its type it noted there existed no solid place for it in the government military inventory. The Davis was returned with a polite, “no-thanks� and ultimately sold or dispersed as assets in the civil suit.


left) Some Davis cars used a Hercules four, but the militaries used a Continental L-head industrial four. This engine is commonly seen in forklifts and other industrial or agricultural applications and was actually produced until fairly recently. It was a close relation of the engine that powered the first jeep built by Bantam in 1940. In the Davis, the 63 hp are enough to make the 2,200 pound rig fairly peppy by old-time standards. Top speed was said to be in excess of 70mph. (right) Here’s a laugh. A front ski was included with the test vehicle for use in snow. Most doubt it was ever tested, but LaPerriere restored it with everything else. The single front wheel was always a problem due to excessive ground pressure of the skinny tire bearing all the front weight.

There were approximately 17 cars built and the three 494X militaries. All of the 494s and 12 of the cars still exist. The one shown was restored by military vehicle collector Fred LaPerriere to depict its time under test. The second of the three, serial number 494X-2, had been in the hands of a Denver based Davis franchise owner and acquired as part of the lawsuit settlement. LaPerriere bought and restored the unique rig in the ’90s, but it has been sold to another collector since these photos were taken.

What happened to Davis himself? After serving his time, he went on to help develop amusement park rides and formed an automotive consulting firm. He even tried to resurrect the threewheeler idea once, but, not surprisingly, found willing investors in short supply. Davis finally retired to Palm Springs in the late ’60s and died in 1973. In his possession at the time were two Davis cars and one of the militaries, which he drove regularly. Was he a crook or just an inexperienced, over-enthusiastic dreamer? Only Davis himself knew for sure but he left a bunch of interesting automotive history to explore

_________________
SFC Jeff Button "High Angle Hell"
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum