±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 384
Total: 384
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Home
03: Community Forums
04: Home
05: Home
06: Photo Gallery
07: Home
08: Home
09: Home
10: Community Forums
11: Home
12: Photo Gallery
13: Home
14: Home
15: Home
16: Home
17: Member Screenshots
18: Home
19: Community Forums
20: Photo Gallery
21: Member Screenshots
22: Downloads
23: Home
24: Home
25: News Archive
26: Home
27: Home
28: Community Forums
29: Home
30: Home
31: Home
32: Home
33: Photo Gallery
34: Home
35: Downloads
36: Photo Gallery
37: Community Forums
38: Community Forums
39: Community Forums
40: Photo Gallery
41: Home
42: Statistics
43: Home
44: Home
45: Home
46: Home
47: Home
48: Home
49: Community Forums
50: Community Forums
51: Home
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Home
55: Downloads
56: Photo Gallery
57: Home
58: Community Forums
59: Home
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Home
64: Your Account
65: Home
66: Home
67: Community Forums
68: Home
69: Home
70: Downloads
71: Photo Gallery
72: Home
73: Home
74: Home
75: Community Forums
76: Home
77: Community Forums
78: Home
79: Home
80: Photo Gallery
81: Photo Gallery
82: Community Forums
83: Home
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Home
87: Photo Gallery
88: Your Account
89: Home
90: Community Forums
91: Photo Gallery
92: Community Forums
93: Home
94: Community Forums
95: News Archive
96: Home
97: Photo Gallery
98: Member Screenshots
99: Community Forums
100: Home
101: Photo Gallery
102: Community Forums
103: Member Screenshots
104: Home
105: Home
106: Home
107: Photo Gallery
108: Community Forums
109: Member Screenshots
110: Home
111: Community Forums
112: Community Forums
113: Photo Gallery
114: Home
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Downloads
119: Community Forums
120: Downloads
121: Home
122: Home
123: Downloads
124: Downloads
125: Member Screenshots
126: Home
127: Member Screenshots
128: Photo Gallery
129: Downloads
130: Downloads
131: Community Forums
132: Photo Gallery
133: Statistics
134: Community Forums
135: Downloads
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Photo Gallery
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Photo Gallery
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Community Forums
146: Home
147: Home
148: Home
149: Home
150: Photo Gallery
151: Home
152: Home
153: Statistics
154: Community Forums
155: Your Account
156: Community Forums
157: Home
158: Downloads
159: Community Forums
160: Home
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Home
164: Downloads
165: Community Forums
166: Home
167: Your Account
168: Community Forums
169: Photo Gallery
170: Home
171: Home
172: Photo Gallery
173: Community Forums
174: Member Screenshots
175: Community Forums
176: Photo Gallery
177: Your Account
178: Home
179: Home
180: Member Screenshots
181: Community Forums
182: Home
183: Home
184: Home
185: Community Forums
186: Home
187: Member Screenshots
188: Community Forums
189: Home
190: Home
191: Home
192: Home
193: Home
194: Home
195: Home
196: Home
197: Community Forums
198: Photo Gallery
199: Member Screenshots
200: Community Forums
201: Community Forums
202: Member Screenshots
203: Home
204: Photo Gallery
205: Community Forums
206: Community Forums
207: Home
208: Home
209: Home
210: Home
211: Home
212: Home
213: Photo Gallery
214: Home
215: Photo Gallery
216: Home
217: Home
218: Home
219: Home
220: Home
221: Home
222: Community Forums
223: Home
224: Home
225: Home
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Home
229: Home
230: Home
231: Community Forums
232: Community Forums
233: Home
234: Member Screenshots
235: Community Forums
236: Photo Gallery
237: Downloads
238: Member Screenshots
239: Member Screenshots
240: Community Forums
241: Home
242: Home
243: Home
244: Home
245: Home
246: Community Forums
247: Home
248: Member Screenshots
249: Home
250: Photo Gallery
251: Home
252: Community Forums
253: Photo Gallery
254: Member Screenshots
255: Community Forums
256: Home
257: Community Forums
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Home
261: Home
262: Community Forums
263: Home
264: Community Forums
265: Home
266: Member Screenshots
267: Home
268: Photo Gallery
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Home
272: Contact
273: Home
274: Community Forums
275: Home
276: Member Screenshots
277: Community Forums
278: Community Forums
279: Photo Gallery
280: Community Forums
281: Member Screenshots
282: Treasury
283: Member Screenshots
284: Member Screenshots
285: Community Forums
286: Photo Gallery
287: Your Account
288: Home
289: Community Forums
290: Community Forums
291: Home
292: Home
293: Home
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Home
297: Member Screenshots
298: Home
299: Community Forums
300: Home
301: Home
302: Community Forums
303: Member Screenshots
304: Home
305: Home
306: Home
307: Home
308: Home
309: Home
310: Home
311: Home
312: Photo Gallery
313: Downloads
314: Downloads
315: Community Forums
316: Community Forums
317: Community Forums
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Member Screenshots
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Home
324: Community Forums
325: Member Screenshots
326: Home
327: Community Forums
328: Home
329: Home
330: Community Forums
331: Home
332: Home
333: Home
334: Home
335: Photo Gallery
336: Home
337: Community Forums
338: Home
339: Home
340: Home
341: Home
342: Community Forums
343: Community Forums
344: Member Screenshots
345: Photo Gallery
346: Home
347: Community Forums
348: Home
349: Home
350: Home
351: Home
352: Community Forums
353: Photo Gallery
354: Home
355: News Archive
356: Photo Gallery
357: Downloads
358: Community Forums
359: Downloads
360: Member Screenshots
361: Home
362: Community Forums
363: Home
364: Home
365: Community Forums
366: Home
367: Downloads
368: Photo Gallery
369: Home
370: Home
371: Community Forums
372: Member Screenshots
373: Community Forums
374: Community Forums
375: News Archive
376: Community Forums
377: Member Screenshots
378: Home
379: Community Forums
380: Home
381: Community Forums
382: Home
383: Home
384: News Archive

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 4:07 am
Post subject: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

money.cnn.com/news/new...RTUNE5.htm

Marines Not Recommending End Of General Dynamics Amphib Pact

February 22, 2007: 06:54 PM EST

WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- The U.S. Marines aren't recommending that a big General Dynamics Corp. (GD) amphibious vehicle contract be canceled, even though a new competition is on the table, a Marine Corps spokesman said Thursday.

The Marines are trying to get their multibillion dollar Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle program back on track, after it failed initial testing last year. Last month, program officials said it faced up to three years in redesign work.

Now the Pentagon has asked industry about possible alternate designs for the program. Replies to the "sources sought" notice are due Friday, and could include anything from minor modifications to an entire new vehicle design.

This raises questions about whether General Dynamics will keep the program. Defense Department officials have turned up the heat on General Dynamics in recent weeks - for example, on Feb. 13, Navy Secretary Donald Winter told a House Appropriations Committee panel that the Navy was considering "funding of a second source."

But the Marines say it's too early to throw in the towel on the General Dynamics design.

"We have not made any recommendation to terminate our contracts with General Dynamics," said David Branham, a spokesman for the Marine Corps program office, in a Thursday telephone interview.

The Marine Corps plan calls for buying seven new vehicles over the next two years to build and test improvements to the original design. Industry responses could complement that effort.

"The only thing that we're doing, is we're trying to hear from who's out there that has the requisite expertise to weigh in with capabilities that may be applied to these problems," Branham said.

BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) is the only other major manufacturer of tracked vehicles. Industry observers said BAE might contribute to the redesign effort, but it's unlikely the military would want a completely new alternate design.

"It is not realistic at this point in the history of the EFV program to talk about a new design or a second source," said Lexington Institute defense analyst Loren Thompson. "If the existing amphibious vehicles are not replaced expeditiously, people are going to die."

Defense Department weapons buyers are scheduled to discuss the program next week at a Defense Acquisition Board meeting. That panel will weigh alternatives and possibly settle on a way forward.

General Dynamics spokesman Rob Doolittle said the current EFV design has met most of its performance parameters. The company will continue to work on improvements.

"We are working closely with the marines to achieve the reliability that they desire," Doolittle said.

BAE Systems declined to comment.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

www.dodtechmatch.com/D...7854070032

This announcement constitutes a Sources Sought Synopsis for market research. This is NOT a Request for Proposal. The following information is requested to assist the United States Marine Corps Direct Reporting Program Manager, Advanced Amphibious Assault (DRPM AAA) in conducting market research of industry. The DRPM AAA is seeking source information from industry leaders who develop and produce track combat vehicles that can provide an alternate design concept of the Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle (EFV) that will include concept drawings, architecture, design analysis for selected alternate subsystems (Preliminary Design Review level of design completion). A follow-on effort may be requested for a possible detailed alternate design to include design analysis, test results (where applicable) for selected alternate subsystems (Critical Design Review level of design completion). This request is for information only and is intended to identify companies that can devel! op and produce a reliable amphibious capability that is a self-deploying, high-water-speed, amphibious, armored tracked vehicle and is capable of seamlessly transporting Marines from ships located beyond the horizon (approximately 25 nautical miles) to inland objectives. It must provide essential command, control, communications, and intelligence (C4I) functions for embarked personnel and EFV units. The mission of the EFV Program is to field an EFV that will provide the principle means of tactical surface mobility for the Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) during both ship-to-objective maneuver and sustained combat operations ashore as part of the Navy and Marine Corps concepts within the Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare (EMW) capstone. The EFV will provide the MAGTF with increased operational tempo, survivability, and lethality throughout the battle space and across all quadrants of conflict. Companies or teams interested in responding to this request should mail the fol! lowing: a statement of the company's professional, technical and other capabilities, facilities and history with this type of development or similar development, the name and telephone number of a company representative that can be contacted, and the company's address. Contractors should submit responses electronically to Robin Kuschel at Kuschelrj @ efv.usmc.mil, no later than 5:00 PM EST on February 23, 2007. Information submitted to DRPM AAA in response to this notice will be treated as subject to the Trade Secrets Act and not generally releasable to the public unless otherwise indicated. It is emphasized this information is for planning and information purposes only and is NOT to be construed as a commitment by the Government to enter into a contractual agreement, nor will the Government pay for information solicited. No solicitation exists; therefore, do not request a copy of the solicitation. It is a potential offeror's responsibility to monitor these sites for the release of any solicitation or synopsis.
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 8:37 am
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

Hi Folks!

I think within the last two months or so, I have seen the Gunny do a report on the EFV on Mail Call and last week, or maybe the week before that ex-Navy Seal did a report on Future Weapons.

One of the things that was done on Future Weapons that impressed me was one of the test vehicles was lifted up in the air and the driver retracted the track system. At the front and rear, panels slide out to cover the opening left by the tracks. For the long bottom run, panels mounted flat along the hull bottom folded outward to cover the bottom run. After all the different panels did their thing, the track system was up and out of sight and not dragging in the water.

Both shows gave it glowing reports. I wonder what the problem or problems are?
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:24 am
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

I think the main problem is finding money to pay for anything that won't be used in Iraq.

Ever since Desert Storm I've been wondering how much sense it made to use AAVs for long cross country runs. in ODS I figured 'well it's a one time thing' but then we saw them used on the long run up to Bahgdad in the latest adventure and I kept seeing them used as regular cross country transportation. I wonder what shape they will be in for amphibious use after they have been driven around the desert so much?

I saw part of the Future Weapons segment and found myself wondering how practical a beach landing weapons system is these days. Even with the high speed and longer range I just wonder if the capability would ever be used.

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 4:18 pm
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

Did anybody see a mention of which design goals weren't met? That's a rather diffuse phrase. It could either refer to seat cover material cracking or the thing refusing to float for more than fifteen minutes. Both of those would be considered a 'failed test'. The U.S. has a longtime history of its reach exceeding its grasp on light vehicle design. Remember aaaaaall those light tank designs to replace Sheridan over the past 25-ish years?
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 4:24 pm
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

- mike_Duplessis
Did anybody see a mention of which design goals weren't met? That's a rather diffuse phrase. It could either refer to seat cover material cracking or the thing refusing to float for more than fifteen minutes. Both of those would be considered a 'failed test'. The U.S. has a longtime history of its reach exceeding its grasp on light vehicle design. Remember aaaaaall those light tank designs to replace Sheridan over the past 25-ish years?


I don't recall the Army (in particular) really seeming to want one very badly....and certainly not enough to divert any funds from anything it wanted more...like Bradley or Abrams. I had the impression that lighter "tanks" (as we understand them) had been pretty much dismissed as irrelevant. Not that I agree with that.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Cloudy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 06, 2006
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:23 am
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

Here's the Gov't Accounting Office's report on the EFV:

www.gao.gov/new.items/d06349.pdf

Do you realize that they currently cost 12 million dollars+ each? Yikes!
After watching the complicated track retraction sequence on "Future Weapons" (first time I ever saw a good view of it), small wonder that they are having hydraulic problems...

Alan
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:31 am
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

I'm sure I read an article where Vickers engineers took a look at the EFV and when they had finished laughing suggested that the whole hydraulic folding nonsense be abandoned in favor of a bolt on box on the front of the vehicle that held an inflatable bottom section. The idea being that once the vehicle entered the water the bottom section was inflated it formed a bow and covered the tracks etc. Then the vehicle commenced its high-speed run into the beach. When it was close enough to the beach the bottom section was then deflated and jettisoned and the EFV finished the run in its normal amphibious mode.

It sounded a more practical idea as the EFV doesn't have to make the high-speed approach everytime its used but I suspect the idea fell foul of the NIH syndrome and, probably the manufacturers profit margin as it could have slashed the cost of the vehicle apparently despite having to fit a new inflatable section each time.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Cloudy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 06, 2006
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 1:03 am
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

I sort of expected mechanical arms & legs to be deployed and that the pilot would stand the thing up and stride down the beach into the sea and walk along undetected on the sea bottom Wink
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 1:05 am
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

- Cloudy
I sort of expected mechanical arms & legs to be deployed and that the pilot would stand the thing up and stride down the beach into the sea and walk along undetected on the sea bottom Wink


I think that was the backup irish solution... Laughing

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
johnestauffer
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 10:22 pm
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

I saw some pictures of a 'EFV" like vehicle on that was in development by the PRC that looked much like a clone of the USMC's vehicle (except for the turret)

It does seem that the EFV concept is stretching things a bit.
Why go to the trouble of creating a single service, expensive vehicle?
It would seem more cost effective to focus on more LCAC's or similiar platforms that had more versitility.
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 10:47 pm
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

- johnestauffer
It does seem that the EFV concept is stretching things a bit.
Why go to the trouble of creating a single service, expensive vehicle?
It would seem more cost effective to focus on more LCAC's or similiar platforms that had more versitility.


I get to watch those from time to time out here where I live and while they kick up a mess o' mist, I see your point.

I saw that "Futureweapons" episode and the one point I thought strange was the emphasis on "over the horizon" approach. I think he kept referencing distances like 20 miles out or so...maybe more, like 25-30. That seems like a long way to be cruising in for the sake of stealth. OK, it's probably less detectable than a low flying CH-46, but a lot slower. I just wonder how sneaky that kind of op really is and how often you'd get to use it in a forced entry kind of scenario? (if you'd even defined that as "forced") Then again, I'm not used to thinking like a Marine. Seems like a lot of water to cross, to me.
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 3:38 am
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

I theory thats the advantage, keeps ships out of visual & artillery distance from shore - that way enemy may know the Marines are somewhere over the horizon, but dont know exactly what beach they will hit...

My biggest question about Marine Corps amtracs is the need to carry 2 squads in each. It raises/stresses a lot of the requirements when you have to stuff 20+ guys in the back. Of course just carrying a squad like other APCs / IFVs means a lot more vehicles you have to buy... But you know, there is a reason why armies dont go around in vehicles like M59s and M75s...

Way back in the 80s United Defense offered an amphib version of the Bradley...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 3:53 am
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

- Neil_Baumgardner
I theory thats the advantage, keeps ships out of visual & artillery distance from shore - that way enemy may know the Marines are somewhere over the horizon, but dont know exactly what beach they will hit...
Neil


Yeah, I recognized the advantage of keeping 'em guessing, though there are now missiles that'll reach out that far. Still, 30-45 minutes or so to reach the beach?
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Cloudy
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 06, 2006
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:40 am
Post subject: Re: Marine Corps looking for EFV alternatives...

Marine squads are larger than Army squads - as I recall around 13 men. Transporting more men per vehicle is probably more efficient when it comes to storing the vehicles aboard ship. I wonder how they would be used? Suppress the defenses with Marine air assets and advertise that the Marines will soon be landing , send in the EFV's with no softening up from over the horizon in a "stealth" attack with CAS timed to arrive as they hit the beach or no CAS until called to avoid radar detection of the assault force?
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum