±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 368
Total: 368
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: News Archive
03: Member Screenshots
04: Member Screenshots
05: Photo Gallery
06: Community Forums
07: Community Forums
08: Home
09: Photo Gallery
10: Community Forums
11: Photo Gallery
12: Home
13: Photo Gallery
14: Photo Gallery
15: Community Forums
16: Home
17: Home
18: Statistics
19: Photo Gallery
20: Statistics
21: Community Forums
22: Community Forums
23: Statistics
24: Photo Gallery
25: Member Screenshots
26: Home
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: Home
30: Home
31: Community Forums
32: Home
33: Community Forums
34: Home
35: Community Forums
36: Community Forums
37: Photo Gallery
38: Photo Gallery
39: Home
40: Community Forums
41: Downloads
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Photo Gallery
45: Community Forums
46: Home
47: Photo Gallery
48: Home
49: Photo Gallery
50: Community Forums
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Community Forums
56: Member Screenshots
57: Home
58: Community Forums
59: Member Screenshots
60: Community Forums
61: Home
62: Community Forums
63: Home
64: Members List
65: Community Forums
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Home
69: Home
70: Photo Gallery
71: Community Forums
72: Home
73: Home
74: Home
75: Community Forums
76: Member Screenshots
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: Community Forums
80: Member Screenshots
81: News Archive
82: Home
83: Community Forums
84: Photo Gallery
85: Home
86: Community Forums
87: News Archive
88: Home
89: News Archive
90: Community Forums
91: Home
92: Home
93: Photo Gallery
94: Home
95: Community Forums
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Home
99: Home
100: Downloads
101: Photo Gallery
102: Community Forums
103: News
104: News Archive
105: Home
106: Photo Gallery
107: Community Forums
108: Home
109: Community Forums
110: Community Forums
111: Member Screenshots
112: Home
113: Community Forums
114: Home
115: Community Forums
116: Home
117: Home
118: Home
119: Photo Gallery
120: Community Forums
121: Home
122: Photo Gallery
123: Your Account
124: Member Screenshots
125: Community Forums
126: Home
127: Photo Gallery
128: Home
129: Photo Gallery
130: Downloads
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Community Forums
136: Members List
137: Community Forums
138: Photo Gallery
139: Home
140: Members List
141: Community Forums
142: Home
143: Photo Gallery
144: Community Forums
145: News
146: Home
147: Home
148: Members List
149: Home
150: Community Forums
151: Photo Gallery
152: Member Screenshots
153: Community Forums
154: Your Account
155: Community Forums
156: Home
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Community Forums
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Community Forums
164: Member Screenshots
165: Photo Gallery
166: Member Screenshots
167: Community Forums
168: Home
169: Photo Gallery
170: Community Forums
171: Home
172: Home
173: Photo Gallery
174: Member Screenshots
175: Community Forums
176: Home
177: Member Screenshots
178: Home
179: Photo Gallery
180: Community Forums
181: Photo Gallery
182: Home
183: Community Forums
184: Photo Gallery
185: Photo Gallery
186: Home
187: Home
188: Member Screenshots
189: Community Forums
190: Home
191: Home
192: Community Forums
193: Home
194: Home
195: Community Forums
196: Downloads
197: Home
198: Community Forums
199: Downloads
200: Photo Gallery
201: Member Screenshots
202: News Archive
203: Photo Gallery
204: Home
205: Community Forums
206: Photo Gallery
207: Home
208: Home
209: Home
210: Downloads
211: Home
212: Community Forums
213: Member Screenshots
214: Community Forums
215: Home
216: Home
217: Photo Gallery
218: Home
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: News Archive
223: Community Forums
224: Home
225: Member Screenshots
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Home
229: Community Forums
230: Member Screenshots
231: Community Forums
232: Photo Gallery
233: Community Forums
234: Home
235: Community Forums
236: Photo Gallery
237: Statistics
238: Home
239: Community Forums
240: Home
241: Community Forums
242: Photo Gallery
243: Downloads
244: Community Forums
245: Community Forums
246: Home
247: Home
248: Home
249: Photo Gallery
250: Photo Gallery
251: Photo Gallery
252: Home
253: Home
254: Home
255: Member Screenshots
256: Photo Gallery
257: Home
258: Home
259: Member Screenshots
260: Home
261: Community Forums
262: Home
263: Home
264: Home
265: Community Forums
266: Home
267: News
268: News Archive
269: Downloads
270: Home
271: Photo Gallery
272: Downloads
273: Downloads
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Downloads
277: Statistics
278: News Archive
279: Home
280: Statistics
281: Home
282: Member Screenshots
283: Home
284: Home
285: Photo Gallery
286: Community Forums
287: News Archive
288: Community Forums
289: Community Forums
290: Home
291: Community Forums
292: Photo Gallery
293: Member Screenshots
294: Community Forums
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: Home
298: Home
299: Downloads
300: Photo Gallery
301: Community Forums
302: Community Forums
303: Home
304: News Archive
305: Member Screenshots
306: Community Forums
307: Downloads
308: Home
309: Home
310: Community Forums
311: Home
312: Photo Gallery
313: Community Forums
314: Community Forums
315: Statistics
316: Home
317: Home
318: Community Forums
319: News Archive
320: Photo Gallery
321: Home
322: Member Screenshots
323: Downloads
324: Community Forums
325: Members List
326: Community Forums
327: Community Forums
328: Treasury
329: Community Forums
330: Community Forums
331: Home
332: Community Forums
333: Photo Gallery
334: Home
335: Home
336: Home
337: Community Forums
338: Community Forums
339: LinkToUs
340: Downloads
341: Photo Gallery
342: Downloads
343: Home
344: Community Forums
345: Community Forums
346: Downloads
347: Member Screenshots
348: Home
349: Members List
350: Photo Gallery
351: Home
352: Community Forums
353: Home
354: Community Forums
355: Community Forums
356: Home
357: Community Forums
358: Photo Gallery
359: Photo Gallery
360: Home
361: Home
362: Member Screenshots
363: Downloads
364: Community Forums
365: Community Forums
366: Community Forums
367: Home
368: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Stryker
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 9:47 pm
Post subject: Stryker

Hi Folks!

Could this be a M1127 Recon Stryker? I noticed during Mail Call that the Recon carrier Gunny was riding in had the 50 cal mounted on a turret which the M1126 Infantry Carrier doesn't have.

Photo is by Dennis Steele, Army magazine, April issue, page 18

I notice that an old IR service headlight assemble is mounted on the bar armor. It is just to the left of the driver's orange vision block.

The five gallon cans on the lower bar armor reminds me of the STRV-103C S-Tank which had racks for diesel fuel cans along both sides.

Been working on Turmpiter's Styrker. Very interesting kit. One thing I learned was the wench is not under that hatch at the front edge of the top hull, but under that cover behind the driver's hatch. There are three pulleys the cable ran around to get to that cable guide centered on the front edge of the hull. If you are going to mount a wench like that, why not added a couple more pulleys so the crew could run the cable back to the rear and off a center point device?

Interesting photo (to me anyway)
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:05 pm
Post subject: Re: Stryker

- Roy_A_Lingle
Hi Folks! Could this be a M1127 Recon Stryker?


No its not the M1127 recon version - the turret isn't far back enough. I think its the M1129 mortar version withe cupola protection kit.


Been working on Turmpiter's Styrker. Very interesting kit. One thing I learned was the wench is not under that hatch at the front edge of the top hull, but under that cover behind the driver's hatch. There are three pulleys the cable ran around to get to that cable guide centered on the front edge of the hull. If you are going to mount a wench like that, why not added a couple more pulleys so the crew could run the cable back to the rear and off a center point device?


Yes I always thought that a pulley or two would come in handy for mounting a wench Wink

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Burik
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 05, 2006
Posts: 119

PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Stryker

I think this is the RV. The net is in the way for the mortar. I think the mortar version has different hull sides too. I will try and upload a photo.

Note the Duke/Warlock and the Rhino. The camo nets are very common now. Are they for anti-sniping?

I am disappointed that the Trumpeter relied on a pre-production vehicle. Lots of details are wrong for a production vehicle. I am afraid AFV Club might have done the same thing since their MGS photo shows a pre-production vehicle. Still crossing my fingers there.

Roy, what do you think of the RWS? Seems pretty anemic to me. And the legs of the stand do not touch the roof like it should. Every build I have seen so far shows the legs floating. Seems to be some fit issues there to keepin mind.

Dragon's kit is a long way out still.

Bob
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Burik
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 05, 2006
Posts: 119

PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 11:03 pm
Post subject: Re: Stryker

Here is the mortar version. You can see the side is different than in Roy's photo. Roy's has the stowage rack mounted. The mortar version does not have the normal stowage rack; it has a unique one to the MV.



Bob
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 8:52 am
Post subject: Re: Stryker

- Burik
Here is the mortar version. You can see the side is different than in Roy's photo. Roy's has the stowage rack mounted. The mortar version does not have the normal stowage rack; it has a unique one to the MV.


Half the junk on the sides gets junked when they fit the birdcage.

To be honest we may not figure out quite what variant it is.. I have at least four images of different variants in Iraq that are definately not the normal variants - most likely EW versions. But until they appear in the open press I am reluctant to post them...

Here's an image of the M1127 recon variant... the turret appears to be a bit further back than the normal apc variant.

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 9:11 am
Post subject: Re: Stryker

- Burik

Roy, what do you think of the RWS? Seems pretty anemic to me. And the legs of the stand do not touch the roof like it should. Every build I have seen so far shows the legs floating. Seems to be some fit issues there to keepin mind.


Not all the variants have the RWS.. The M1131 AOP has a pintle mount 50 or 40 as does the M1134 TUA version (albeit with a Minimi LMG) as well as the recon & mortar versions.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 11:05 am
Post subject: Re: Stryker

Hi Bob B! Hi Folks!

- Burik


I am disappointed that the Trumpeter relied on a pre-production vehicle. Lots of details are wrong for a production vehicle. I am afraid AFV Club might have done the same thing since their MGS photo shows a pre-production vehicle. Still crossing my fingers there.

Roy, what do you think of the RWS? Seems pretty anemic to me. And the legs of the stand do not touch the roof like it should. Every build I have seen so far shows the legs floating. Seems to be some fit issues there to keepin mind.

Bob


I have it almost glued together and took it into the model club meeting last Sunday for show and tell. For folks who don't know the difference between a Canadian LAV III (couple of guys saw a train load of Canadian armored cars over at Ft Bliss last week) and a Stryker, almost everyone liked it.

I am a bit disappointed and confuzed with why Trumpeter did what they did with the parts layout. Another club member was showing a 1/72 BTR60 APC that he was working on. The front wheels could piviet and all the wheels could rotate. On the Trumpeter kit, it does nether. A couple of times I miss read the instructions and glued the wrong part to the wrong area of the hull.

That RWS has two major items missing. That wheel with the spokes thing on the front of the ammo box is missing and one of the sights is not there. There are two other errors that are very easy to fix with some filling on one and some very thin card to extend a sun shield over that main center sight lens. One thing that surpised me was the way the mount when together. It started out looking like the 50 cal would be able to move up and down and then next thing I see is a part holds everything together in one big unit.

I found a number of parts that needed to be pressed together for a bit until the glue got hold of the parts. If I didn't watch things, some items would lift up or bend and leave gags.

Hopefull one of the resin companies will jump in with some correction parts to convert this kit into a later model.

Something else I am a bit disappoint with is the new Osprey Stryker book. I would think something that would have been covered (and helpful to modellers) is a group of photos that pointed out the changes that took place between the first prototypes and the 3rd BCT set of vehicles. Maybe some day someone to do the hard work to do something like a Hunnicutt book on the Stryker. It would sure be great if he would work up one more bible for us CIA guys.

My 2 cents,
Sgt, Scouts out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
mike_Duplessis
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 236

PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 1:42 pm
Post subject: Re: Stryker

"Something else I am a bit disappoint with is the new Osprey Stryker book."

Yeh, the book industry just isn't used to modern armor evolving as quickly as Stryker has been these days. First the slat cage, then the extended headlights, then the added top armor, then the exhaust shroud, then added the armor for the pintle mount, then the new armored camera mount, then the latests anti-IED objects mounted on the vehicles, etc. etc. Concord pubs seems to have been lighter on ther feet at document this sort of stuff than Osprey lately.
Back to top
View user's profile
Maple_Leaf_Eh
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 517

PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 7:34 pm
Post subject: Re: Stryker

- Roy_A_Lingle

One thing I learned was the wench is not under that hatch at the front edge of the top hull, but under that cover behind the driver's hatch.

Sgt, Scouts Out!


I hope Don has had his sexual harassment sensitivity training !

'The wench is under the covers?'
Back to top
View user's profile
Burik
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 05, 2006
Posts: 119

PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 11:47 pm
Post subject: Re: Stryker

- JimWeb
- Burik
Here is the mortar version. You can see the side is different than in Roy's photo. Roy's has the stowage rack mounted. The mortar version does not have the normal stowage rack; it has a unique one to the MV.


Half the junk on the sides gets junked when they fit the birdcage.

To be honest we may not figure out quite what variant it is.. I have at least four images of different variants in Iraq that are definately not the normal variants - most likely EW versions. But until they appear in the open press I am reluctant to post them...

Here's an image of the M1127 recon variant... the turret appears to be a bit further back than the normal apc variant.


Hi Folks:

I have never seen the stowage rack missing on a variant that has it. The slat armor is designed to go over the top of it. The ICV is the most common variant and the RV is the second most common. I believe this is the RV. Another clue that it is the RV is the smoke discharger you can see midway down the roof (light green grenade poking out). The RV moves the smoke dischargers since the weapon station is a different set-up and has no RWS.

Roy's image is at an angle so we can not tell how far back the weapon station is compared to the sideview, but it does not look off to me.

Cheers.

Bob
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Burik
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Mar 05, 2006
Posts: 119

PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 12:04 am
Post subject: Re: Stryker

- Roy_A_Lingle


That RWS has two major items missing. That wheel with the spokes thing on the front of the ammo box is missing and one of the sights is not there. There are two other errors that are very easy to fix with some filling on one and some very thin card to extend a sun shield over that main center sight lens. One thing that surpised me was the way the mount when together. It started out looking like the 50 cal would be able to move up and down and then next thing I see is a part holds everything together in one big unit.



Hopefull one of the resin companies will jump in with some correction parts to convert this kit into a later model.

Something else I am a bit disappoint with is the new Osprey Stryker book. I would think something that would have been covered (and helpful to modellers) is a group of photos that pointed out the changes that took place between the first prototypes and the 3rd BCT set of vehicles. Maybe some day someone to do the hard work to do something like a Hunnicutt book on the Stryker. It would sure be great if he would work up one more bible for us CIA guys.

My 2 cents,
Sgt, Scouts out!


Roy:

That spoked wheel thing is the cover for the large lense on the RWS. When it is not on the lense it is stored on the ammo box. When it is covering the lense all that would remain on the ammo box would be a raised circle. The Trumpeter kit has neither. The lense cover has a retaining chain too.

As well, the smaller lense has a similar cover and its storage space is in the middle of the RWS. It does not have the ribs though. It also has the reataining chain. Both lenses should have the rain/sun shield too. Trumpeter did not do so well with the smoke dischargers as well. They are way too thin looking. And their mounts are not so good either. The AFV Club photos of the RWS look much nicer.

I am trying to help an aftermarket company with some stuff, but I do not think they want to try and correct the Trumpeter kit. They might wait for the AFV Club kit.

I agree on the Osprey book. They relied too much on the pre-production vehicle for the artwork and other stuff. Nice that there are deployed 3/2 trucks in the book, but the photos are from far away. But it is tough to stay on a moving target like the Stryker. As has been pointed out, lots of small changes already.

By the way, there is a very detailed book out from the Czech Republic (I think) on the Stryker, including slat. I do not have it yet, and it costs something like $60 or $70, but by all accounts it is quite good. Concord was supposed to come out with a Stryker book by the same author (Ralph Zwilling) but I do not know what happened to it. AMPS just released a Boresight issue dedicated to the Stryker. Some great photos of the slat taken from the roof, looking down. Some of my NTC photos are in their too! Smile

Cheers.

Bob
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 6:41 am
Post subject: Re: Stryker



Duh - I'm so stupid... the real clue as to which variant that is lies in the folding wirecutter on the top of the engine deck...

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum