±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 906
Total: 906
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Downloads
02: Community Forums
03: Photo Gallery
04: Home
05: Home
06: News
07: Community Forums
08: Home
09: Community Forums
10: Member Screenshots
11: Photo Gallery
12: Community Forums
13: Photo Gallery
14: Community Forums
15: Photo Gallery
16: Community Forums
17: Statistics
18: Community Forums
19: Community Forums
20: News
21: Community Forums
22: Statistics
23: Community Forums
24: Community Forums
25: Home
26: Community Forums
27: Downloads
28: Community Forums
29: Community Forums
30: Community Forums
31: Member Screenshots
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Home
35: Photo Gallery
36: Community Forums
37: News Archive
38: Member Screenshots
39: News
40: Downloads
41: Photo Gallery
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Photo Gallery
45: Downloads
46: Community Forums
47: Member Screenshots
48: Member Screenshots
49: Member Screenshots
50: Your Account
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: News
54: Home
55: Community Forums
56: Community Forums
57: Home
58: Community Forums
59: Community Forums
60: Community Forums
61: Community Forums
62: Community Forums
63: Home
64: Community Forums
65: Statistics
66: Community Forums
67: Home
68: Home
69: Community Forums
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Photo Gallery
73: Home
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Photo Gallery
77: Community Forums
78: Community Forums
79: Member Screenshots
80: Home
81: Community Forums
82: Community Forums
83: Community Forums
84: Community Forums
85: Photo Gallery
86: Downloads
87: Community Forums
88: Community Forums
89: Home
90: Community Forums
91: Photo Gallery
92: Home
93: Community Forums
94: Photo Gallery
95: Community Forums
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Statistics
99: Community Forums
100: Home
101: Downloads
102: Community Forums
103: Home
104: Community Forums
105: Community Forums
106: Community Forums
107: Supporters
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Home
111: Community Forums
112: Photo Gallery
113: Downloads
114: Photo Gallery
115: Downloads
116: Home
117: Community Forums
118: Community Forums
119: Home
120: Community Forums
121: Photo Gallery
122: Photo Gallery
123: Photo Gallery
124: Downloads
125: Community Forums
126: Photo Gallery
127: Community Forums
128: Photo Gallery
129: Community Forums
130: Photo Gallery
131: Home
132: Photo Gallery
133: Community Forums
134: Home
135: Photo Gallery
136: News Archive
137: Photo Gallery
138: Home
139: Home
140: Photo Gallery
141: Photo Gallery
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Member Screenshots
145: Home
146: News
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Home
150: Photo Gallery
151: Home
152: Community Forums
153: Community Forums
154: Member Screenshots
155: Your Account
156: Home
157: Tell a Friend
158: Home
159: Community Forums
160: Downloads
161: Community Forums
162: Community Forums
163: Statistics
164: Community Forums
165: Photo Gallery
166: Home
167: Community Forums
168: Photo Gallery
169: Home
170: Photo Gallery
171: Photo Gallery
172: Home
173: Photo Gallery
174: Photo Gallery
175: Photo Gallery
176: Downloads
177: Community Forums
178: Community Forums
179: Downloads
180: Community Forums
181: Community Forums
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Home
188: Community Forums
189: Community Forums
190: Contact
191: Community Forums
192: Community Forums
193: Home
194: Community Forums
195: Community Forums
196: Home
197: Member Screenshots
198: Home
199: Home
200: Community Forums
201: Home
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums
204: Community Forums
205: Home
206: Community Forums
207: Home
208: Member Screenshots
209: Photo Gallery
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Community Forums
213: Community Forums
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Community Forums
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Community Forums
222: Community Forums
223: Community Forums
224: Downloads
225: Statistics
226: Community Forums
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Community Forums
232: Community Forums
233: Community Forums
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Statistics
237: Community Forums
238: Community Forums
239: Downloads
240: Community Forums
241: Home
242: Community Forums
243: Community Forums
244: Photo Gallery
245: Home
246: Community Forums
247: Photo Gallery
248: Community Forums
249: Community Forums
250: Statistics
251: Community Forums
252: Community Forums
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: Community Forums
256: Community Forums
257: Statistics
258: Photo Gallery
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Community Forums
262: Community Forums
263: Member Screenshots
264: Downloads
265: Photo Gallery
266: Community Forums
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Community Forums
270: Community Forums
271: Community Forums
272: News Archive
273: News Archive
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Community Forums
277: Community Forums
278: Community Forums
279: Community Forums
280: Community Forums
281: Photo Gallery
282: Photo Gallery
283: Community Forums
284: Downloads
285: News
286: Community Forums
287: Community Forums
288: Home
289: Home
290: Community Forums
291: Community Forums
292: Community Forums
293: Community Forums
294: Home
295: Community Forums
296: Community Forums
297: Community Forums
298: Community Forums
299: Home
300: Community Forums
301: Community Forums
302: Community Forums
303: Community Forums
304: Community Forums
305: Community Forums
306: Community Forums
307: Community Forums
308: Community Forums
309: Community Forums
310: Community Forums
311: Community Forums
312: Community Forums
313: Home
314: Community Forums
315: Community Forums
316: News Archive
317: Home
318: Community Forums
319: Community Forums
320: Community Forums
321: Community Forums
322: Community Forums
323: Community Forums
324: Community Forums
325: Member Screenshots
326: Community Forums
327: Community Forums
328: Downloads
329: Home
330: Community Forums
331: Home
332: Photo Gallery
333: Community Forums
334: Community Forums
335: Photo Gallery
336: Community Forums
337: Community Forums
338: Community Forums
339: Downloads
340: Community Forums
341: Member Screenshots
342: Community Forums
343: Home
344: Community Forums
345: Photo Gallery
346: Community Forums
347: Community Forums
348: Community Forums
349: Member Screenshots
350: Community Forums
351: Photo Gallery
352: Community Forums
353: Community Forums
354: Home
355: Community Forums
356: Community Forums
357: Community Forums
358: Community Forums
359: Member Screenshots
360: Statistics
361: Community Forums
362: Community Forums
363: Community Forums
364: Member Screenshots
365: Member Screenshots
366: Community Forums
367: Photo Gallery
368: Photo Gallery
369: Member Screenshots
370: Photo Gallery
371: Your Account
372: Community Forums
373: Community Forums
374: Home
375: Community Forums
376: Community Forums
377: Member Screenshots
378: Community Forums
379: Photo Gallery
380: Community Forums
381: Community Forums
382: Community Forums
383: Photo Gallery
384: Community Forums
385: Community Forums
386: Community Forums
387: Community Forums
388: Community Forums
389: Statistics
390: Photo Gallery
391: Statistics
392: Community Forums
393: Downloads
394: Community Forums
395: Community Forums
396: Home
397: Home
398: Community Forums
399: Community Forums
400: Community Forums
401: Photo Gallery
402: Home
403: Community Forums
404: Community Forums
405: Community Forums
406: Photo Gallery
407: Statistics
408: Community Forums
409: Community Forums
410: Community Forums
411: Community Forums
412: Photo Gallery
413: Statistics
414: Community Forums
415: News Archive
416: Community Forums
417: Home
418: Community Forums
419: Community Forums
420: Photo Gallery
421: Community Forums
422: Community Forums
423: Community Forums
424: Home
425: Community Forums
426: Statistics
427: Member Screenshots
428: Community Forums
429: Community Forums
430: Community Forums
431: Home
432: Photo Gallery
433: Community Forums
434: Home
435: Community Forums
436: Community Forums
437: Community Forums
438: Photo Gallery
439: Community Forums
440: Community Forums
441: Community Forums
442: Photo Gallery
443: Photo Gallery
444: Downloads
445: Downloads
446: Member Screenshots
447: Photo Gallery
448: Community Forums
449: Community Forums
450: Downloads
451: Community Forums
452: Photo Gallery
453: Community Forums
454: Community Forums
455: Home
456: Photo Gallery
457: Community Forums
458: Photo Gallery
459: Home
460: Downloads
461: Statistics
462: Home
463: Statistics
464: Community Forums
465: Community Forums
466: Home
467: Downloads
468: Photo Gallery
469: Photo Gallery
470: Member Screenshots
471: Your Account
472: Member Screenshots
473: Photo Gallery
474: Community Forums
475: Community Forums
476: Downloads
477: Home
478: Downloads
479: Community Forums
480: Community Forums
481: Statistics
482: News Archive
483: Community Forums
484: Home
485: Home
486: Community Forums
487: Community Forums
488: Community Forums
489: Community Forums
490: Photo Gallery
491: Community Forums
492: Community Forums
493: Community Forums
494: Community Forums
495: Downloads
496: Community Forums
497: Home
498: Community Forums
499: Community Forums
500: Home
501: Community Forums
502: Community Forums
503: Community Forums
504: Home
505: Contact
506: Community Forums
507: Photo Gallery
508: Community Forums
509: Downloads
510: Statistics
511: Statistics
512: Community Forums
513: Home
514: Community Forums
515: Community Forums
516: Photo Gallery
517: Community Forums
518: Photo Gallery
519: Member Screenshots
520: Community Forums
521: Community Forums
522: Photo Gallery
523: Home
524: Community Forums
525: Home
526: Community Forums
527: Community Forums
528: Home
529: Photo Gallery
530: Community Forums
531: News Archive
532: Statistics
533: Community Forums
534: Community Forums
535: Member Screenshots
536: Home
537: Community Forums
538: Community Forums
539: Community Forums
540: Photo Gallery
541: Downloads
542: Community Forums
543: Community Forums
544: Community Forums
545: Photo Gallery
546: Community Forums
547: Community Forums
548: Photo Gallery
549: Community Forums
550: News Archive
551: Community Forums
552: Home
553: Community Forums
554: Home
555: Community Forums
556: Downloads
557: Community Forums
558: Community Forums
559: Community Forums
560: Downloads
561: Photo Gallery
562: Community Forums
563: Community Forums
564: Home
565: Community Forums
566: Photo Gallery
567: Home
568: Statistics
569: Community Forums
570: Photo Gallery
571: Community Forums
572: Community Forums
573: Photo Gallery
574: Home
575: Community Forums
576: Home
577: Photo Gallery
578: Community Forums
579: Member Screenshots
580: Member Screenshots
581: Home
582: Photo Gallery
583: Community Forums
584: Community Forums
585: Photo Gallery
586: Photo Gallery
587: Home
588: Home
589: Community Forums
590: Community Forums
591: Home
592: Community Forums
593: Community Forums
594: Photo Gallery
595: Community Forums
596: Community Forums
597: Community Forums
598: Community Forums
599: Photo Gallery
600: Community Forums
601: Community Forums
602: Home
603: Member Screenshots
604: Home
605: Photo Gallery
606: Downloads
607: Community Forums
608: Community Forums
609: Community Forums
610: Photo Gallery
611: Community Forums
612: Home
613: Photo Gallery
614: Community Forums
615: Community Forums
616: Community Forums
617: Community Forums
618: Home
619: Home
620: Downloads
621: Community Forums
622: Statistics
623: Home
624: Community Forums
625: Community Forums
626: Community Forums
627: Home
628: Community Forums
629: Downloads
630: Downloads
631: Downloads
632: Home
633: Community Forums
634: Photo Gallery
635: Community Forums
636: Community Forums
637: Community Forums
638: News Archive
639: Community Forums
640: Home
641: Community Forums
642: Home
643: Home
644: Community Forums
645: Home
646: Community Forums
647: Home
648: Home
649: Community Forums
650: Photo Gallery
651: Community Forums
652: News Archive
653: Home
654: Community Forums
655: Member Screenshots
656: Home
657: Photo Gallery
658: Community Forums
659: Community Forums
660: Community Forums
661: Member Screenshots
662: Home
663: Community Forums
664: Community Forums
665: Photo Gallery
666: Member Screenshots
667: Community Forums
668: Home
669: Photo Gallery
670: Community Forums
671: Community Forums
672: Member Screenshots
673: Community Forums
674: Community Forums
675: Statistics
676: Community Forums
677: Community Forums
678: Community Forums
679: Photo Gallery
680: News Archive
681: Community Forums
682: Community Forums
683: Community Forums
684: Community Forums
685: Member Screenshots
686: Community Forums
687: Community Forums
688: Community Forums
689: Community Forums
690: Community Forums
691: Statistics
692: Photo Gallery
693: Community Forums
694: Statistics
695: Community Forums
696: Community Forums
697: Home
698: Community Forums
699: Member Screenshots
700: Community Forums
701: Community Forums
702: Photo Gallery
703: Photo Gallery
704: Photo Gallery
705: Photo Gallery
706: Community Forums
707: Community Forums
708: Community Forums
709: Home
710: Community Forums
711: Community Forums
712: Photo Gallery
713: News Archive
714: Community Forums
715: Community Forums
716: Community Forums
717: Community Forums
718: Community Forums
719: Community Forums
720: Community Forums
721: Community Forums
722: Photo Gallery
723: Community Forums
724: Community Forums
725: Community Forums
726: Home
727: Community Forums
728: Community Forums
729: Community Forums
730: Community Forums
731: Community Forums
732: Photo Gallery
733: Community Forums
734: Community Forums
735: Community Forums
736: Community Forums
737: Community Forums
738: Community Forums
739: Community Forums
740: Home
741: Photo Gallery
742: Photo Gallery
743: Community Forums
744: Community Forums
745: Community Forums
746: Member Screenshots
747: Community Forums
748: Statistics
749: Community Forums
750: Community Forums
751: Community Forums
752: Community Forums
753: Community Forums
754: Community Forums
755: Community Forums
756: Community Forums
757: Community Forums
758: Community Forums
759: Community Forums
760: Photo Gallery
761: Photo Gallery
762: Community Forums
763: Community Forums
764: Community Forums
765: Community Forums
766: Community Forums
767: Community Forums
768: Community Forums
769: Photo Gallery
770: Community Forums
771: Community Forums
772: Community Forums
773: Community Forums
774: Home
775: Photo Gallery
776: Community Forums
777: Home
778: Community Forums
779: Photo Gallery
780: Community Forums
781: Home
782: Community Forums
783: Community Forums
784: Community Forums
785: Statistics
786: Community Forums
787: Member Screenshots
788: Community Forums
789: Community Forums
790: Community Forums
791: Community Forums
792: Community Forums
793: Community Forums
794: Home
795: Community Forums
796: Community Forums
797: Community Forums
798: Community Forums
799: Community Forums
800: Community Forums
801: Photo Gallery
802: Photo Gallery
803: Community Forums
804: Community Forums
805: Statistics
806: Community Forums
807: Downloads
808: Community Forums
809: Community Forums
810: Community Forums
811: Member Screenshots
812: Community Forums
813: Community Forums
814: Photo Gallery
815: Community Forums
816: Member Screenshots
817: Community Forums
818: Community Forums
819: Community Forums
820: Community Forums
821: Community Forums
822: Community Forums
823: Community Forums
824: Community Forums
825: Community Forums
826: Community Forums
827: Community Forums
828: Community Forums
829: Home
830: Community Forums
831: Community Forums
832: Community Forums
833: Community Forums
834: Community Forums
835: Community Forums
836: Downloads
837: Photo Gallery
838: Community Forums
839: Photo Gallery
840: Community Forums
841: Community Forums
842: Community Forums
843: Community Forums
844: Community Forums
845: Home
846: Community Forums
847: Community Forums
848: Community Forums
849: Community Forums
850: Photo Gallery
851: Your Account
852: News
853: Downloads
854: Community Forums
855: Community Forums
856: Community Forums
857: Community Forums
858: Community Forums
859: Statistics
860: Community Forums
861: Home
862: Home
863: Photo Gallery
864: Home
865: Community Forums
866: Community Forums
867: Home
868: News Archive
869: Community Forums
870: Home
871: Member Screenshots
872: Community Forums
873: Community Forums
874: Community Forums
875: Downloads
876: Community Forums
877: Home
878: Community Forums
879: Community Forums
880: Community Forums
881: Community Forums
882: Community Forums
883: Photo Gallery
884: Photo Gallery
885: Community Forums
886: Community Forums
887: Photo Gallery
888: Home
889: Home
890: Home
891: Community Forums
892: Community Forums
893: Treasury
894: Member Screenshots
895: Member Screenshots
896: Home
897: Home
898: Community Forums
899: Photo Gallery
900: Community Forums
901: News
902: Home
903: Community Forums
904: Community Forums
905: Home
906: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Canuck Armor
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
blair
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 87

PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2007 4:15 am
Post subject: Canuck Armor

As a Canadian I'm confused as to why our governemnt thought it prudent to purchase the Leo Tank as opposed to the M1. If the Australians got such a good deal then why didn't our brothers across the border cut us the same slack?

I know we have an existing history with the Leopard, but when you consider the cost of having that armor shipped back to Canada and the logistics of spare parts wouldn't the price difference per unit be closer?

Also, by having the same system as the Americans, wouldn't the cost of ammunition and transportation of the original units and spare parts be considerably less than a Transoceanic supply "line"?

Did our government somehow decide that the Leo was far more capable in the Canadian Tundra than the M1?

I mean we dropped our FN's for the C+ versions of the M16, so why wouldn't we do the same for armor?
Back to top
View user's profile
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2007 4:58 am
Post subject: Re: Canuck Armor

Blair,
Have you ever wondered why there are more users of the Leopard II than the M1 series ?? Until Austrailia got the M1 the only foreign users were Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait. Same thing applies to automobiles. Unless the buyer has some incentive to puchase from a particular maker, they usually go with what best suits their needs and within their budget. Budget usually winning out. In my personal opinion for what it's worth, I believe the M1 would have been exported in greater numbers if it had a diesel engine.

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2007 11:37 am
Post subject: Re: Canuck Armor

Aren't the Canadian tanks coming from excess stocks of NATO allies? If so it may have been a very sweet deal. I agree that there may be reluctance to go to a vehicle with a turbine instead of diesel when you won't have enough units to justify the extra training and support structure.

But I would not discount the 'We want to prove we are not subserviant to the U.S. in our procurement choices' line of thought either

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:41 pm
Post subject: Re: Canuck Armor

I think I would agree with Joe D - I suspect support costs (ie fuel) for the M1 Abrams' turbine engine may have been too much for the Canadian army. A diesel is much cheaper...

Otherwise the US can probably offer just as sweet a deal, if not better, on used Abrams than anyone can on used Leopard 2s... In fact, US foreign military sales and excess defense article transfers usually have a big advantage in terms with the extremely large support & spare parts packages that come with them...

Abrams would also have the advantage of coming with some of the neater whizzbang tech like FBCB2 that wont come with Leos... Thats a big reason why the Australians bought Abrams IMO... But then again the Australians probably see a bigger requirement to possibly fight alongside the US Army in the future than the Canadian army does...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2007 2:06 pm
Post subject: Re: Canuck Armor

- Neil_Baumgardner
I think I would agree with Joe D - I suspect support costs (ie fuel) for the M1 Abrams' turbine engine may have been too much for the Canadian army. A diesel is much cheaper...

Otherwise the US can probably offer just as sweet a deal, if not better, on used Abrams than anyone can on used Leopard 2s... In fact, US foreign military sales and excess defense article transfers usually have a big advantage in terms with the extremely large support & spare parts packages that come with them...


I agree about support costs but also I wonder how many non DU armor M1s there are available for FMS? Wasn't that a requirement for Australia? I could see that being a requirement (or at least a desire to keep down fringe media stories)


Abrams would also have the advantage of coming with some of the neater whizzbang tech like FBCB2 that wont come with Leos... Thats a big reason why the Australians bought Abrams IMO... But then again the Australians probably see a bigger requirement to possibly fight alongside the US Army in the future than the Canadian army does...

Neil


The Canadians won't be fighting alongside the U.S.?? Are you hinting that we need to watch out for leopards rolling out of Saskatchewan and Manitoba into Montana & North Dakota??? Shocked Smile

_________________
Bob Smart (bsmart@xecu.net)
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2007 2:26 pm
Post subject: Re: Canuck Armor

Nah, I'm just hinting that Australia appears to see itself as a coalition partner for the US for almost whereever it goes. Australian strategy is undergoing a change from the post-Vietnam focus on continental defense to expeditionary operations alongside or in cooperation with the US. The ability to fight alongside the US is a big reason why they are mechanizing their forces and they're in Iraq today... And interoperability drives requirements for equipment...

For better or worse, Canada does not see the same purpose or have the same objectives for its military. Its focus has and is on peacekeeping operations... Warfighting (especially alongside the US) tends not to be a primary objective, although the current CDS has decried that somewhat...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2007 2:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Canuck Armor

Hi Folks!

I agree with the 'cost of support' idea but I think there maybe another issue that was also factored in. The Leo 2s are surplus and available now.

From what I am seeing, there are not a lot of surplus Abrams waiting for someone to buy or rent. The Army is transfering rebuild Abrams to the USMC to replace high mileage vehicles that need to be overhauled.

It sounds like the Canadians want the first batch in time for their next rotation. That means delays only for training and minor upgrades.

The news here at Ft. Bliss is the FCS test BCT is facing delays in receiving Abrams and Bradleys because there are none available due to overhaul/rebuild schedule and funding crunch.

My guess is there are at least three reasons to go with that group of Leos. The Leo 2s are cheaper to use, a group of vehicles that have not been ran into the ground are available and factory space for upgrading is available to support the Canadain time line for deployment and training.

You can also add to the above the fact that almost everytime a group of international AFV experts rank the worlds MBTs, the Leo 2 is rated number one and the Abrams as second best. As a retired member of the US military, that fact is hard to take, but it is a fact.
My pocket full of pennies.
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2067
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2007 3:36 pm
Post subject: Re: Canuck Armor

Roy,
As an M1 Tanker (Former unfortunately) I hate to admit it but I agree with you. One tank that I think does not get enough recognition is the UK's Challenger II. I spent about 5 hours with a British Master Gunner in the Udari Desert in early 2003 getting a full tour and an honest ( I believe ) Pro's and Con's of the tank. I was very impressed. Some things made so much more sense in maintenance, reliability and simplicity. They also seem to have the APU problem well covered, something we have yet to fix.

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Jason_Bobrowich
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 09, 2006
Posts: 71

PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2007 4:03 pm
Post subject: Re: Canuck Armor

Blair,

Being an ex-Canadian Leopard commander I am still very much in contact with Armoured Corps members who are in the know about the Leopard 2 purchase.

The Abrams was looked at and considered to replace the Leopard C2. The deal that was struck with the Dutch and the Germans at Kraus-Maffei was far better than anything as far as cost, availablility, and long term servicing the US could offer for the Abrams. The deal includes not only the tanks, but state of the art upgrades, and parts, training, and extras for five years.

All of the tanks purchased will be upgraded to the Leopard 2A6 version as I previously had posted. The 2A5/2A6 has already been tested by the Germans for further upgrades such as:

-IFF Identification Friend/Foe system
-Europower pack to increase the 1500 hp to 1800 hp and reduce fuel consumption...this will make the Leopard 2 the most powerful tank in the world.
-active defence systems to defeat both RPG and guided weapons

The LKE II DM 53 120 mm round used by the Germans in the Leopard 2A6 can penetrate double reactive armour up to 4000 meters....this is without the use of a DU penetrator.

Ammunition transport is not an issue. All of the Leopard C1 and C2 ammunition was made in Quebec. This has been done for years. It will be easy for them to convert to producing 120 mm ammunition....after the technology is passed from the Germans to the Canadian company. The 120 mm is also capable of firing US made rounds also so more ammunition can be bought from them....no problems that I can see.

You also have to see the bigger picture too. Canada is buying the Leopard 2 not only as its new main battle tank but every heavy armoured support AFV will also be based on the Leopard 2 chassis.

-Leopard 2 Buffel ARV
-Armoured Engineer Vehicle...likely the Kodiak AEV-3
-Leguan or PSB-2 AVLB

This is very very smart for logistics, common parts, and training.

Not even the US forces can boast that. They are spread out with different vehicles for different uses. They have to train techs, crews, and maintainers on multiple vehicles.....M1A1, M1A2, M88A2, M104 Wolverine AVLB, M1 Panther 2, M60 AVLB, M9 ACE....and they don't even have an AEV except for the Assault Breacher Vehicle that will enter service in 2007 with the USMC.

You cannot compare the purchase of rifles to the purchase of tanks. But if you want to...the Canadian C7 is produced in Canada by Diemaco/Colt Canada. The C7 was based on the US M16A2 but had many improvements. The C7/C8 is now produced in Canada for the Canadian Forces, Norway, Denmark, Netherlands, and British SAS.

The Royal Canadian Armoured Corps Master Instructors made the recommendation to their chain of command and on to the government that the Leopard 2 was the better tank overall when compared to the Abrams as far as cost, future upgrades, armour protection, and user friendliness. The US could not match all of this with any deal they offered.

Neil, I have to disagree that the Canadian Forces are focused on Peacekeeping operations now or in the future. Things have changed since 9-11. Canadian Forces primary mandate has always been to maintain an overall combat capability and the "peacekeeping/peacemaking" operations are just a testament to how flexible the forces can be to be able to go into a foreign nation and be neutral yet tough and not bring its political agenda.

Why does any nation that will "fight" alongside the US have to have the same equipment? The British don't have a bit of US equipment yet they did just fine in both Gulf wars. The chances of Canada deploying to another mission on foreign soil and "fighting" along side another Leopard 2 user nation are far greater than with the Abrams. The Danish have some of their Leopard 2A5DKs on standby for Afghanistan.

Look at the UNPROFOR, IFOR, SFOR, and KFOR missions and the use of both the Leopard 1 and Leopard 2:

UNPROFOR-Danish Leopard 1A5DK, Canadian Badger AEV
IFOR- Canadian Leopard C1, Danish Leopard 1A5DK, Italian Leopard 1A5IT, Dutch Leopard 2A4
SFOR- Danish Leopard 1DK, Italian Leopard 1A5IT, Dutch Leopard 2A5
KFOR- German Leopard 2A5, German Leopard 2A4, Canadian Leopard C1, Danish Leopard 1A5DK-1, Belgium Leopard 1A5BE, Norway Leopard 1 Bergepanzer, Norway Leopard 1 AEV, Norway Leopard 1 Leguan AVLB, Italian Leopard 1A5IT

Those are just off the top of my head there may be more users...only the US used the Abrams in the Balkans.

With the purchase of the four C-17 Globemaster aircraft Canada will be able to transport its new tanks anywhere in the world...no reliance on the US for this anymore.

The German loaned Leopard 2A6Ms will be in Afghanistan for the fall 2007 rotation. The first Canadian modified Leopard 2A6Ms will go to Afghanistan and replace the German loaned tanks in 2008.
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2007 5:12 pm
Post subject: Re: Canuck Armor

- Jason_Bobrowich
Blair,

Neil, I have to disagree that the Canadian Forces are focused on Peacekeeping operations now or in the future. Things have changed since 9-11. Canadian Forces primary mandate has always been to maintain an overall combat capability and the "peacekeeping/peacemaking" operations are just a testament to how flexible the forces can be to be able to go into a foreign nation and be neutral yet tough and not bring its political agenda.

Why does any nation that will "fight" alongside the US have to have the same equipment? The British don't have a bit of US equipment yet they did just fine in both Gulf wars. The chances of Canada deploying to another mission on foreign soil and "fighting" along side another Leopard 2 user nation are far greater than with the Abrams. The Danish have some of their Leopard 2A5DKs on standby for Afghanistan.


Yeah, I figured I'd get in trouble for that somehow Wink However, General Hillier, even post 9/11, has commented on how the Canadian military has been too focused on peacekeeping rather than warfighting. But I will grant that has started to change...

The missions you mentioned are all very good examples of peacekeeping missions... Look at ODS, OIF, you'll see a different mix of systems - and no Leopards...

Of course not every nation needs to have the same platforms, but rather what comes inside - battle management, comms, etc - is what counts in terms of interoperability. Its easier to get those systems if you get Abrams rather than something else. Although its not impossible to get them otherwise of course - the Brits got some, but not a lot, of BFT systems during the initial combat ops of OIF. But even then, look at the different roles & responsibilities that were taken during those initial combat ops & the drive to Baghdad...

At the very least, you have to admit there is a pretty big difference in how Australia and Canada see their future military capabilities and warfighting requirements vis-a-vi the United States. IMO, JMHO, that influences the procurements that each has made... You made an excellent point that more often than not the Canadian army will be deploying alongside Leopard users and not Abrams...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Jason_Bobrowich
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 09, 2006
Posts: 71

PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2007 5:53 pm
Post subject: Re: Canuck Armor

Canada wanted to send an Armoured Battlegroup to the 1991 Gulf War...it was called Operation Broadsword and would have included the 8CH in the Leopard C1....logistics proved to be the failing point of the operation....not the crews or tanks.

I think Canada has a realistic way of looking at how to maintain a new main battle tank and work side by side with NATO forces over the next couple of decades...the Germans plan to keep the Leopard 2A6, with further upgrades for the next 25+ years.

The Canadian, US, British, Dutch, and Australian forces are all fighting side by side in Afghanistan without integrated battlefield management systems...and doing a fine job too.

It will be interesting to see how long it takes for US, Australian, Egyptian, Kuwaiti, and Saudi Arabian Abrams to go into battle along side each other compared to the Leopard 2 user forces.
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2007 6:25 pm
Post subject: Re: Canuck Armor

Jason, some very good points. But I think we're talking about a different kind of "fighting." The United States, Australia and UK seek to have a "full-spectrum" military capability - from peacekeeping through low-intensity conflict, small-scale contingencies and counter-insurgency all the way right up to large-scale conventional warfare - and are making procurement decisions that support that objective. Not many countries aspire to have that complete range of capabilities, and you may not need integrated battle management systems for the lower end.

In terms of "going into battle," will we ever see a record of engagement of Leopard 2 tanks against other tanks? Maybe... The Abrams & Challenger 2 already do... And I dont think thats so much a statement upon the tanks, but rather on the users and their foreign policy and military choices & objectives... Not to say that Leopard 2s arent useful for other situations & missions, but they were designed primarily to fight other tanks...

But as I said, Hillier and others would apparently like to see a more balanced mix in the Canadian military - and the Leopard 2s are part of that...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2007 6:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Canuck Armor

- Roy_A_Lingle
Hi Folks!
You can also add to the above the fact that almost everytime a group of international AFV experts rank the worlds MBTs, the Leo 2 is rated number one and the Abrams as second best. As a retired member of the US military, that fact is hard to take, but it is a fact.
My pocket full of pennies.
Sgt, Scouts Out!


Thats only if you measure the tanks by very traditional, static measures such as armor, firepower (gun), and mobility... But IMO, those arent even competitive discriminators anymore. Tank development has been stagnant for almost a decade now... They all have sufficient levels of protection for most warfighting requirements, they all have 120mm guns with similar ranges, ammo & firepower, and they all have at least enough mobility for modern requirements.

Again, IMO, its what inside that counts as the real discriminators right now- O&S costs for turbine engines not withstanding. Look at the engagement ranges in Operation Desert Storm and Operation Iraqi Freedom - what really set the US and its allies aside was the capability to detect, acquire and destroy enemy armor at greater ranges. In most cases in the initial combat ops of OIF, Iraqi armor (the little that there was that did fight) didnt even know where it was being engaged from, let alone able to fire upon their opponents. For those engagements, what counted was blue force tracking, radios & optics... In most cases, US armor protection wasnt even tested by Iraqi tank rounds...

Similarly, what were the real discriminators in 1940? Was it armor, firepower and mobility? Those factors appear to have mattered relatively little for the French S35s and Char Bs vs the German Pz Is and IIs, and precious few IIIs and IVs. Rather, what mattered was doctrine, maneuver and the ability to coordinate forces - by which radios (which the French tanks lacked) that were a critical element. Certainly, the static measures mattered more in 1944 - but I dont think the Leopard 2 has a Tiger-scale of advantages over the Abrams... And they all had radios at that point to level that part of the playing field...

Frankly, if you intend to fight full-up large-scale warfare - against other tanks - its what comes _with_ the Abrams tank that matters a lot more than the "advantages" that the Leopard 2 has... But thats just MHO...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Jason_Bobrowich
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Aug 09, 2006
Posts: 71

PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2007 11:39 pm
Post subject: Re: Canuck Armor

I personally wouldn't say that Australia is going for a "full-spectrum" military capability. They only bought 59 M1A1 AIMs and only 45 or so of them will be in Regimental service the rest are for training. They still use M113s as APCs, it can't keep up with the Abrams...are they going to buy Bradleys too?

I don't see a rush to get Aussie tankers to Iraq in loaned or leased or purchased Abrams....where's the heavy support for the objective? There is about 850 total Australians involved in the operation in Iraq. This includes Navy, Airforce, and HQ related members. They have one Squadron (strength of 90 men) of ASLAVs to provide diplomatic escorts in Baghdad. They have about 700 troops in Afghanistan and will be adding 300 more SF troops. A commitment yes, but not even as much as Canada has in Afghanistan(2500 deployed)...and Canada already has tanks over there.

I don't think full up large scale warfare has been fought for a very long time. It is great that the Coalition and allies had victory in the Gulf and you are right that no tanks there were really tested against equal tanks or well trained crews. But the lessons learned in the Gulf wars is why Germany developed the Leopard 2A6 so it could engage and destroy the enemy at ranges up to 4000 metres. Only the Israelis have fought large scale tank against tank battles....they have learned lessons the hard way.

There are new rounds under development by the Israelis (120 MM APAM) which will give the Leopard 2 a huge cabability to engage any type of threat. Both the US and Germans already use a 120 mm HEAT Multi-purpose rounds to engage targets that aren't tanks.

Foreign policy and military choices & objectives...ah yes, where are those weapons of mass destruction again? Actually, I don't really care about the foreign policy because when the bullets start flying it's your tank crew that matters and you do your job.

Were the Abrams and Challenger not primarily designed to fight and destroy other tanks? They were designed during the cold war to battle the Warsaw Pact tank hoards not to fight against non uniformed insurgents. All tanks crews' primary threat is enemy tanks...the rest is just gravy.

The Canadian Forces with the Leopard 2A6 will be fully capable of any operation also. However, Canada is limited to Combat Team Battlegroup deployments simply because of the size of the combat forces....the same as Australia with the Abrams.

To me, I think the M1A1 Abrams and the Leopard 2A6 are pretty much equal. Yup, the Abrams has fully integrated battlefield managements systems but that doesn't mean that the Leopards can't be upgraded. All the systems in the world don't help when an enemy is using IEDs and simple RPG-7 to disable the Abrams.

Maybe we will see full up large scale warfare when Iran is invaded or how about North Korea as an opponent?
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 12:27 am
Post subject: Re: Canuck Armor

I agree with many of your points Jason...

As for Australia, they have LAVs (like Canada) in addition to the M113s and are currently looking at buying self-propelled howitzers... IMO, you dont buy SPHs unless you're planning to be able to fight on the high end of conflict.

I certainly didnt want to turn this into a discussion of the politics and merits of Iraq, never mind Iran or North Korea... But I would observe that, regardless of the merits of any particular conflict, certain countries are making the investments to be able to fight on the high end of conflict.

Requirements for conducting different kinds of military operations drive procurement decisions... As you pointed out, its more likely that the Canadian army will be operating Leo 2s alongside other Leo 2s in operations like Afghanistan rather than alongside Abrams or Challenger in large-scale military operations (which admittedly may be few & far between). In operations like Afghanistan, or even Iraq right now, where protection against IEDs and RPGs is what counts most, there probably is very little difference...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 2
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum