±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 294
Total: 294
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Home
03: Home
04: Home
05: Home
06: News
07: Home
08: Home
09: Home
10: Home
11: Community Forums
12: Member Screenshots
13: Home
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Community Forums
17: Member Screenshots
18: News Archive
19: Downloads
20: Community Forums
21: Community Forums
22: Member Screenshots
23: Member Screenshots
24: News Archive
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Community Forums
29: News Archive
30: Home
31: Photo Gallery
32: Home
33: Community Forums
34: Community Forums
35: Photo Gallery
36: Community Forums
37: Home
38: Statistics
39: Home
40: Search
41: Home
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Community Forums
46: Downloads
47: News Archive
48: Community Forums
49: Downloads
50: Member Screenshots
51: Community Forums
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Member Screenshots
56: Community Forums
57: Community Forums
58: Community Forums
59: Your Account
60: Member Screenshots
61: Member Screenshots
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Member Screenshots
66: Community Forums
67: Community Forums
68: Downloads
69: Community Forums
70: Home
71: Community Forums
72: Home
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Community Forums
76: Home
77: Downloads
78: Member Screenshots
79: Community Forums
80: Community Forums
81: Community Forums
82: Member Screenshots
83: Downloads
84: Home
85: Community Forums
86: Community Forums
87: Member Screenshots
88: Home
89: Community Forums
90: Your Account
91: Photo Gallery
92: Community Forums
93: Home
94: Member Screenshots
95: Photo Gallery
96: Community Forums
97: Community Forums
98: Downloads
99: Community Forums
100: Home
101: Community Forums
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Downloads
105: Community Forums
106: Member Screenshots
107: Your Account
108: Community Forums
109: Community Forums
110: Member Screenshots
111: Home
112: Home
113: Community Forums
114: Photo Gallery
115: Downloads
116: Statistics
117: Home
118: Community Forums
119: Community Forums
120: Your Account
121: Community Forums
122: Home
123: Community Forums
124: Community Forums
125: Downloads
126: Community Forums
127: Community Forums
128: Photo Gallery
129: Community Forums
130: Member Screenshots
131: Community Forums
132: Member Screenshots
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Photo Gallery
136: Community Forums
137: Community Forums
138: Downloads
139: Community Forums
140: Community Forums
141: Community Forums
142: Community Forums
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Downloads
146: Community Forums
147: Community Forums
148: Community Forums
149: Home
150: Member Screenshots
151: Home
152: Community Forums
153: Downloads
154: Community Forums
155: Community Forums
156: Community Forums
157: Statistics
158: Home
159: Community Forums
160: Home
161: Downloads
162: Community Forums
163: Downloads
164: Member Screenshots
165: Downloads
166: Home
167: Downloads
168: Community Forums
169: Community Forums
170: Home
171: Community Forums
172: Member Screenshots
173: Community Forums
174: Your Account
175: News Archive
176: News Archive
177: Community Forums
178: Home
179: Community Forums
180: Community Forums
181: Community Forums
182: Community Forums
183: Community Forums
184: Community Forums
185: Community Forums
186: News Archive
187: Community Forums
188: Community Forums
189: Member Screenshots
190: Home
191: Community Forums
192: Downloads
193: Downloads
194: Community Forums
195: Your Account
196: Home
197: Community Forums
198: Photo Gallery
199: Home
200: Community Forums
201: Member Screenshots
202: Community Forums
203: Downloads
204: Member Screenshots
205: Community Forums
206: Home
207: Community Forums
208: Home
209: Home
210: Community Forums
211: Community Forums
212: Your Account
213: Downloads
214: Community Forums
215: Community Forums
216: Community Forums
217: Home
218: Community Forums
219: Community Forums
220: Community Forums
221: Photo Gallery
222: Downloads
223: Member Screenshots
224: Community Forums
225: Home
226: News Archive
227: Community Forums
228: Community Forums
229: Community Forums
230: Community Forums
231: Member Screenshots
232: Community Forums
233: Member Screenshots
234: Community Forums
235: Community Forums
236: Downloads
237: Downloads
238: Community Forums
239: Home
240: Community Forums
241: Home
242: Community Forums
243: News Archive
244: Member Screenshots
245: Community Forums
246: Downloads
247: Community Forums
248: Photo Gallery
249: Downloads
250: Home
251: News
252: Home
253: Community Forums
254: Community Forums
255: Community Forums
256: Community Forums
257: Member Screenshots
258: Community Forums
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: Home
262: Downloads
263: Downloads
264: Community Forums
265: News Archive
266: Home
267: Community Forums
268: Community Forums
269: Member Screenshots
270: Home
271: Community Forums
272: Community Forums
273: Home
274: Community Forums
275: Community Forums
276: Member Screenshots
277: Home
278: Community Forums
279: Community Forums
280: Member Screenshots
281: Home
282: Downloads
283: Photo Gallery
284: Community Forums
285: Home
286: Community Forums
287: Community Forums
288: Community Forums
289: Community Forums
290: Downloads
291: Photo Gallery
292: Downloads
293: Member Screenshots
294: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2007 1:45 pm
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

Yeah, time is usually an issue. I had to make it to a meeting - Fort Jackson (on Friday) was just a brief stop.

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2007 1:52 pm
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

Hi Jim! Hi Folks!

- JimWeb

I always have great difficulty telling the difference between the M46 & M46A1.....
Cool


You have to get inside the engine or the driver's compartments to be able to tell the differance AFAIK.

The M46 (New) {as it was first called} was equiped with the powerpack and control systems used in the M47. The M46 (New) was later renamed M46A1 to avoid confusion between the vehicles.

Spot Report!
Sgt, Scouts Out!

Referance: "The M26 Pershing and Variants, T23E3/M26-M26A1-M45-M46/M46A1, page 4 and 6 by Troy D. Thiel, Schiffer Military History
M46 engine: AV-1790-5A V12 mo-gas
M46A1 engine: AV-1790-5B V12 mo-gas
M46 transmission: cross-drive cd-850-3
M46A1 trans: cross-drive cd-850-4

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.


Last edited by Roy_A_Lingle on Tue May 22, 2007 12:16 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2007 2:00 pm
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46,

- Neil_Baumgardner




Hmm this sort of reminds me - JED now has 29 identified variants of the M114 listed... This is on the new server as the old one is not currently being updated. New server should be on-line, probably, this weekend - 136Gb capacity....

BTW if you want to help check out the new server for errors and cop a free look then drop me an email.

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2007 2:04 pm
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46,

- Roy_A_Lingle

The M46 (New) {as it was first called} was equiped with the powerpack and control systems used in the M47. The M46 (New) was later renamed M46A1 to aviod confusion between the vehicles.


Roy Do you know if its correct that the M46s were all farmed off to various allies and replaced by A1s in the US Army when they started to come off the production line? Or is this just an old soldiers (wives) tale?

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2007 2:18 pm
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46,

Hi Jim! Hi Folks!

- JimWeb

Roy Do you know if its correct that the M46s were all farmed off to various allies and replaced by A1s in the US Army when they started to come off the production line? Or is this just an old soldiers (wives) tale?
Cool


I have no idea (or informantion on that). But based on my military career, my guess would be that older versions went first, (as in M46) followed by newer version (as in M46A1) when replaced by even newer models (as in M47) which in turn was replaced/passed on to others when the M48 started going into service. That's a wives tale that has some bases to it, even without facts to support it.

Until I read a comment that the M26/M46 tanks served with other NATO countries, I was not aware that anyone other than the US Army and USMC used those two vehicles. I have never seen a picture of either with markings from any of the other NATO countries that I can remember.

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2007 2:43 pm
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

How large were the M46 vice M46A1 production runs? The Northlake IL example is SN 248; the one at Fort Knox is SN 368; and finally the one at Fort Jackson is SN 1169... I suspect the first two at least are vanilla M46s?

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
JimWeb
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1439
Location: The back of beyond
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2007 3:43 pm
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46,

- Roy_A_Lingle

I have no idea (or informantion on that). But based on my military career, my guess would be that older versions went first, (as in M46) followed by newer version (as in M46A1) when replaced by even newer models (as in M47) which in turn was replaced/passed on to others when the M48 started going into service. That's a wives tale that has some bases to it, even without facts to support it.


So using a bit of logic we can assume that any images taken after a certain date would be of M46A1 rather than M6...

The trouble is (of course) - what date?

Cool

_________________
TTFN
Jim

If your not a member of JED then your
not serious about anything military..

***********************
www.jedsite.info
JED Military Equipment
***********************
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website ICQ Number
Kurt_Laughlin
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 577

PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2007 1:07 am
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46,

There's at least one other M46, at Cantigny IL.

To think, I've climbed on half of them. . .

KL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2007 1:58 am
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

Kurt, thanks for the info. I was aware of the following in Wheaton / Catigny, IL, but not an M46:

M26 Pershing
M47 Patton RN 12J866
M48 Patton SN 2650
T26E4 Super Pershing Only surviving T26E4?; RN301281432

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2007 8:54 am
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

Hi Neil Hi Folks!

- Neil_Baumgardner

How large were the M46 vice M46A1 production runs?
Neil


Production of M46s?

It is my understanding that there was NO production of M46s.
The M46 was just a M26 which had the rear half of the hull cut off and replaced with a modified rear hull and a new powerpack.

As to the question of when the M46A1 upgrade started, my guess would be that the developement of the M47 might provide some clues.

When did the the M47 start development?
When was it standardized?
At what date, did it have the same powerpack the M46A1 received?
If not, when did it start receiving that powerpack?
Sense the M46 was a modification of the M26 hull. M46 (New) modifications may have started shortly after the time the M47, with the same powerpack, started production and the remainder of any M26s still in service were converted to M46s.

Even if a date can be nailed down, there is no way to be sure a photo dated after said date, shows a M46A1. I would say it's a case of call all of them M46s unless someone can get inside to check the driver's controls or inspect the powerpack and confirm the model numbers on the engine and transmission.

Base on what LITTLE I know about the M46 program, that is my intell estimate on when to call the first Patton tank a M46A0 or a M46A1.
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2007 9:55 am
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

If the M46/M46A1s were all rebuild of M26s were they assigned new serial numbers or are the serial numbers their original M26 numbers?

If they were not assigned new numbers than trying to find a 'break point' where they changed may be futile since they could have been selected for rebuild without regard to serial number

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2007 10:09 am
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

Hi Bill! Hi Folks!

- bsmart

If the M46/M46A1s were all rebuild of M26s were they assigned new serial numbers or are the serial numbers their original M26 numbers?

If they were not assigned new numbers than trying to find a 'break point' where they changed may be futile since they could have been selected for rebuild without regard to serial number


Good point Bob. With that in mind, we need to add in the M45-105mm How's hulls which were also convered to M46 90mm main gun tanks.

The problem just got a little bigger.
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2007 10:15 am
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

I'll take a look at Hunnicutt's Patton tonight. He usually refers to the SNs of the pilot vehicles - if they are low numbers I think we can assume they restarted the numbering. It should also be able to tell me how many M46s were remanufactured vs new build M46A1s - which should give something of a starting point for telling A0s from A1s by the SN (in theory).

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2007 11:15 am
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

Another thought

If M46A1s were 'new build' was it just a case of at some point inserting the new powerpacks into the existing M26 production chain? I'm sure the production chain was running at a slow pace at that point (like all the new production between V-J day and Korea) so it may have been a case that M46A1 numbers picked up with the number after the last chassis that got the older power pack.

Has it been established that M46A1s were new builds? From the thread so far I thought it was just the model powerpack they got that made the difference. Were the powerpacks different enough that they would not have been interchanged in the field?

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2007 11:28 am
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

Hi Bob! Hi Folks!

- bsmart
Another thought

If M46A1s were 'new build' was it just a case of at some point inserting the new powerpacks into the existing M26 production chain? I'm sure the production chain was running at a slow pace at that point (like all the new production between V-J day and Korea) so it may have been a case that M46A1 numbers picked up with the number after the last chassis that got the older power pack.

Has it been established that M46A1s were new builds? From the thread so far I thought it was just the model powerpack they got that made the difference. Were the powerpacks different enough that they would not have been interchanged in the field?


It is my understanding that there were NEVER any new built M46 or M46A1 hulls. All were modifications of older M26 and M45 hulls.

The A1 upgrade also included changes with the driver's controls.

Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 2 of 4
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum