±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 354
Total: 354
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Community Forums
02: Community Forums
03: Community Forums
04: Home
05: Member Screenshots
06: Home
07: Home
08: Member Screenshots
09: Home
10: Member Screenshots
11: Member Screenshots
12: Community Forums
13: Community Forums
14: Member Screenshots
15: Home
16: News Archive
17: Home
18: Photo Gallery
19: News
20: Photo Gallery
21: Community Forums
22: Home
23: Member Screenshots
24: Photo Gallery
25: Member Screenshots
26: Community Forums
27: Home
28: Member Screenshots
29: Community Forums
30: Your Account
31: Community Forums
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Home
35: Home
36: Home
37: Member Screenshots
38: Community Forums
39: Member Screenshots
40: Community Forums
41: Downloads
42: Home
43: Community Forums
44: Community Forums
45: Member Screenshots
46: Community Forums
47: Photo Gallery
48: Downloads
49: Home
50: Community Forums
51: Home
52: Community Forums
53: Community Forums
54: Community Forums
55: Home
56: Photo Gallery
57: Member Screenshots
58: Home
59: Home
60: Member Screenshots
61: Community Forums
62: Downloads
63: Downloads
64: Photo Gallery
65: Home
66: Photo Gallery
67: Photo Gallery
68: Photo Gallery
69: Community Forums
70: Home
71: Photo Gallery
72: Downloads
73: Community Forums
74: Community Forums
75: Member Screenshots
76: Member Screenshots
77: Home
78: Home
79: Home
80: Member Screenshots
81: Home
82: Home
83: Home
84: Community Forums
85: Community Forums
86: Home
87: Home
88: Member Screenshots
89: Member Screenshots
90: Home
91: Community Forums
92: Downloads
93: Community Forums
94: Photo Gallery
95: Community Forums
96: Home
97: Member Screenshots
98: Photo Gallery
99: News Archive
100: Home
101: Home
102: Photo Gallery
103: Home
104: Home
105: Member Screenshots
106: Community Forums
107: Downloads
108: Photo Gallery
109: Downloads
110: Home
111: Photo Gallery
112: Community Forums
113: Photo Gallery
114: Community Forums
115: Photo Gallery
116: Home
117: News Archive
118: Downloads
119: Photo Gallery
120: Photo Gallery
121: Home
122: Community Forums
123: Statistics
124: Home
125: Home
126: Community Forums
127: Home
128: Photo Gallery
129: Community Forums
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Photo Gallery
133: Downloads
134: Photo Gallery
135: Downloads
136: Community Forums
137: News Archive
138: News Archive
139: Home
140: Member Screenshots
141: Home
142: Member Screenshots
143: Home
144: Home
145: Downloads
146: Community Forums
147: Home
148: Downloads
149: News Archive
150: Community Forums
151: Home
152: News Archive
153: Member Screenshots
154: Member Screenshots
155: Photo Gallery
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Photo Gallery
159: Member Screenshots
160: Community Forums
161: Downloads
162: Member Screenshots
163: Community Forums
164: Community Forums
165: Home
166: Member Screenshots
167: Community Forums
168: Photo Gallery
169: Downloads
170: Photo Gallery
171: Photo Gallery
172: Downloads
173: Community Forums
174: Member Screenshots
175: Community Forums
176: Downloads
177: Photo Gallery
178: Downloads
179: Home
180: Downloads
181: Community Forums
182: Home
183: Home
184: Member Screenshots
185: News Archive
186: Member Screenshots
187: Downloads
188: Photo Gallery
189: Downloads
190: Community Forums
191: Community Forums
192: Downloads
193: Downloads
194: Photo Gallery
195: Downloads
196: Downloads
197: Community Forums
198: Community Forums
199: Home
200: Community Forums
201: Home
202: Member Screenshots
203: Photo Gallery
204: Community Forums
205: Home
206: Home
207: Photo Gallery
208: Member Screenshots
209: Home
210: Community Forums
211: Downloads
212: Photo Gallery
213: Photo Gallery
214: Statistics
215: Home
216: Statistics
217: Home
218: Home
219: Home
220: Home
221: Downloads
222: Photo Gallery
223: Home
224: Photo Gallery
225: Member Screenshots
226: Community Forums
227: Downloads
228: Community Forums
229: Member Screenshots
230: Home
231: Member Screenshots
232: Community Forums
233: Home
234: Downloads
235: Home
236: Home
237: Photo Gallery
238: Community Forums
239: Downloads
240: Downloads
241: Community Forums
242: Community Forums
243: Home
244: Home
245: Downloads
246: Member Screenshots
247: Photo Gallery
248: Home
249: Photo Gallery
250: Downloads
251: Community Forums
252: Downloads
253: Member Screenshots
254: Community Forums
255: Community Forums
256: Community Forums
257: Photo Gallery
258: Photo Gallery
259: Community Forums
260: Community Forums
261: News Archive
262: Photo Gallery
263: Member Screenshots
264: Photo Gallery
265: Community Forums
266: Home
267: Home
268: Community Forums
269: Photo Gallery
270: Community Forums
271: Home
272: Community Forums
273: Home
274: Community Forums
275: Home
276: Home
277: Member Screenshots
278: Home
279: Statistics
280: Home
281: Home
282: Home
283: Home
284: Home
285: Home
286: Home
287: Community Forums
288: Home
289: Home
290: Home
291: Home
292: Home
293: Home
294: Home
295: Photo Gallery
296: Photo Gallery
297: Photo Gallery
298: Community Forums
299: Home
300: Community Forums
301: Photo Gallery
302: Downloads
303: Home
304: Member Screenshots
305: Photo Gallery
306: Community Forums
307: Community Forums
308: Home
309: Home
310: Photo Gallery
311: Community Forums
312: Photo Gallery
313: Downloads
314: Home
315: Downloads
316: Home
317: Member Screenshots
318: Community Forums
319: Home
320: Home
321: Home
322: Member Screenshots
323: Member Screenshots
324: Home
325: Downloads
326: Home
327: Home
328: Member Screenshots
329: Photo Gallery
330: Community Forums
331: Downloads
332: Home
333: Home
334: Photo Gallery
335: Photo Gallery
336: Community Forums
337: Community Forums
338: Photo Gallery
339: Home
340: Photo Gallery
341: News Archive
342: Photo Gallery
343: Photo Gallery
344: Community Forums
345: Community Forums
346: Community Forums
347: Home
348: Photo Gallery
349: Home
350: Community Forums
351: Member Screenshots
352: Photo Gallery
353: Home
354: Photo Gallery

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2068
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2007 12:17 pm
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

Hi Everyone,
Great thread on the M46 going here.

Until I read a comment that the M26/M46 tanks served with other NATO countries, I was not aware that anyone other than the US Army and USMC used those two vehicles. I have never seen a picture of either with markings from any of the other NATO countries that I can remember


South Korea had some (M46) for a while IIRC. They have one in the War Museum in Seoul. I know the 2nd Division had three still on static display in 2002. Two at Camp Casey, one was in front of 1st Tank, One in front of 2nd Tank, and the last at the Division Museum in Uijonbu, Camp Red Cloud. With all the changes I'm not sure what might have happened to them, Hopefully they bring them home. I know 2nd Tank's was in poor shape, being a former hard target. I have some pretty good pictures of the 1st Tank display at home.
Roy, I actually heard/read some where all M46's and M46A1's were farmed off. I also heard all the M46's used in the Korean war never came home and instead were transfered to the new ROK Army.That's why there are so few examples in the US. Unlike the M47's none were returned to the US when these countries upgraded to their own or newer tanks (That I know of), being considered too obsolete to be worth keeping for issue to other countries later. They probably served better as parts for M47's (They shared a lot of them). This would probably explain why I've seen so many wrecks of them on overseas ranges too.

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2007 1:15 pm
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

Hi Joe! Hi Folks!

- Joe_D

South Korea had some (M46) for a while IIRC. They have one in the War Museum in Seoul. I know the 2nd Division had three still on static display in 2002. Two at Camp Casey, one was in front of 1st Tank, One in front of 2nd Tank, and the last at the Division Museum in Uijonbu, Camp Red Cloud. With all the changes I'm not sure what might have happened to them, Hopefully they bring them home. I know 2nd Tank's was in poor shape, being a former hard target. I have some pretty good pictures of the 1st Tank display at home.
Joe D


Speaking of Korea, when I was over there, the parade ground in front of the UN Headquarters Office Building had a M26 setting at one end of it.

- Joe_D

Roy, I actually heard/read some where all M46's and M46A1's were farmed off. I also heard all the M46's used in the Korean war never came home and instead were transfered to the new ROK Army.That's why there are so few examples in the US. Unlike the M47's none were returned to the US when these countries upgraded to their own or newer tanks (That I know of), being considered too obsolete to be worth keeping for issue to other countries later. They probably served better as parts for M47's (They shared a lot of them). This would probably explain why I've seen so many wrecks of them on overseas ranges too.
Joe D


I remember seeing a large target holding area at Hohenfels (1974-1978) full of, what I though at the time, were Pershing tanks. It was only later that I learned that a Pershing with two mufflers on the rear fenders was NOT a Pershing, but a M46 Patton!

Speaking of spare parts for the M47s, I wonder if any of the hulls had their M26/M46 turrets replaced by the M47 type. After all, why build new hulls, if all you need to do if replace the turret? Could that possible, ALSO, help account for why there are very few M26 and M46 tanks that have survived?

Very interesting thread! Time for bed here in Far West Texas! Crying or Very sad
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
jcneel
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 101
Location: Victoria, Texas
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2007 6:07 pm
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

The M46's have a different front end than does the M47's. The M46 front end matches that of the M26 Pershing, but with a more squared out casting over the respirator device or whatever it is that it covers (not near my references at home and not really thinking too straight here at work at the moment to remember exactly what this is). The M47's have an all new cast front end.

cn
Back to top
View user's profile
mykef2
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Feb 19, 2006
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2007 12:08 am
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46,

Re : M46 tanks

Sad to say, Fort Irwin received a bunch of M46 and I think a few M47's as European returns in 1996. I believe they were Spanish. They were lined up at the edge of the dry lake airfield.

At that time they were destined for the live fire range, although the OPFOR regiment (4/73rd Armor at the time) pulled one M46 in and painted it in a Korean War Tiger scheme.

hth,
mike
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2007 12:13 am
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

Mike,
Is this M46 still there?

Jeff,
You know anything about this one?

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2007 12:26 am
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

FYI, Hunnicutt refers to SN 16 and SN 31 early production M46s - so it appears that they were given new SNs after conversion from M26s. Hunnicutt is somewhat unclear on how many M46s vs M46A1s were built:

"An initial production run of 800 M46s was included in the 1949 budget and it was estimated that 1215 additional M26s were available for conversion during the 1950 fiscal eyar. All of these plans were to be modified by unexpected events in the Far East." (p 14)

Otherwise Hunnicutt (p 17) says 360 M46A1s were built.

Some sites appear to claim that 800 M46s were built (as planned) plus the 360 M46A1s for a total of 1160 M46s of both types - but that would make SN 1169 a fairly odd number... Although I'd probably bet it is an M46A1 regardless...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Kurt_Laughlin
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 577

PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2007 1:27 am
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46,

I believe Charles Lemons discussed M46s and serials on the old site. I have a printout of a message from around 6/27/05, (message 65191) that was in the middle of the thread.

KL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2007 1:50 am
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

Care to share what was said? Or are you going to just tease us?

I wish we hadnt given up the archive of the old site at least...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2007 5:30 am
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

Hi Heil! Hi Folks!

- Neil_Baumgardner
FYI, Hunnicutt refers to SN 16 and SN 31 early production M46s - so it appears that they were given new SNs after conversion from M26s. Hunnicutt is somewhat unclear on how many M46s vs M46A1s were built:

"An initial production run of 800 M46s was included in the 1949 budget and it was estimated that 1215 additional M26s were available for conversion during the 1950 fiscal eyar..... (p 14)

Otherwise Hunnicutt (p 17) says 360 M46A1s were built.

Some sites appear to claim that 800 M46s were built (as planned) plus the 360 M46A1s for a total of 1160 M46s of both types - but that would make SN 1169 a fairly odd number... Although I'd probably bet it is an M46A1 regardless...
Neil


Neil, question! Can you tell from the text if he talking about conversions ONLY or is he saying new hulls and turrets where constructed?

When it comes to Hunnicutt's books, Patton is one of two of his books I don't have yet.

Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2007 9:19 am
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

It appears he is only talking about conversions. He does say "production" as well, but I believe that term can include "new" production as well as conversions in the broad sense.

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2007 10:45 am
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

I read over that section last night also and found it somewhat vague. I remember in one passage he mentioned that the designation for M46 (new) was changed to M46A1 to reduce confusion. This makes me think that when he was talking about 'production' of M46s he is actually talking about conversions of existing M26s (Just now I'm wondering if there are any pertinent comments in the Pershing book)

As far as the numbers I now interpret the passage about the 800 as saying that the 800 were commited to conversion in the 1949 budget and that there would still be 1215 M26s planned for conversion in FY 50. Although he says the FY 50 plans were disrupted by the conflict in Korea it doesn't say none of the 1215 were converted. So I think we have 800 FY49 conversions + 360 Newbuilds (M46A1) + an unknown number of FY50 conversions.

In another section he says Korean units kept their M46s longer than anyone else because the Truce accords were interpreted to mean that new equipment could not be brought into the country so even after the type was retired everywhere else it remained in Korea. That section of the truce accords must eventually have either been renegotiated or reinterpreted since much more modern equipment is now over there Smile

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2007 11:41 am
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

Hi Bob! Hi Folks!

- bsmart

Just now I'm wondering if there are any pertinent comments in the Pershing book


Off the top of head, (I am still a work), he only says something like, "the T-23E3 lead to the T-40 which became the M46". At that point the development of tank history in the Pershing book ends.

Update/correction: Now that I have my book:
On page 154, Hunnicutt reports on the 1948 modernization program for a new power pack. The test pack was installed into a modified M26, which was later redesignated M26E2. May 1948, vehicle sent to APGs for testing. Page 156, ....results incorporated into the T40, which was standardized as the M46.

Near the bottom of p156, he reports on the M3A1 90 cannon. The paragrafe ends with "Both the M26A1 and the M46 were destined to serve alongside the standard Pershing in Korea."

Those two items are the only references to the M46 in the Pershing book.
Time for bed!
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.


Last edited by Roy_A_Lingle on Wed May 23, 2007 1:07 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Joe_D
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: 2068
Location: Razorback Country
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2007 11:59 am
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

Hey Mkef2,
Welcome. Gotta question. You sure you didn't mean 1986 instead of 96?
By 1996 11th ACR was the OPFOR. In '86 they were still 1-73 Armor, then switched to 1-63 Armor in Oct when they became the 177th Armor Brigade (Seperate). I remember all the tanks lined up at Bike Lake then. A bunch of M47's. I also remember a bunch of M26's laying around as hard targets too during that time.

Joe D
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2007 2:17 pm
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

- Roy_A_Lingle
Hi Bob! Hi Folks!

Those two items are the only references to the M46 in the Pershing book.
Time for bed!
Sgt, Scouts Out!


Durn

I thought it might mention the conversion of some M26s into M46s and mybe pin down the number better

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Kurt_Laughlin
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 577

PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2007 11:15 pm
Post subject: Re: Fort Jackson SC Armor - Flamethrower Sherman, M41, M46, M5..

- Neil_Baumgardner
Care to share what was said? Or are you going to just tease us?

I wish we hadnt given up the archive of the old site at least...

Neil


I dunno - all I kept was one page with M26 serials that was in a "M26/M46 Numbers" thread. . .

KL
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 3 of 4
All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum