±Recent Visitors

Recent Visitors to Com-Central!

±User Info-big


Welcome Anonymous

Nickname
Password

Membership:
Latest: HighestAce
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 6648

People Online:
Members: 0
Visitors: 203
Total: 203
Who Is Where:
 Visitors:
01: Home
02: Home
03: Home
04: Community Forums
05: Community Forums
06: Member Screenshots
07: Community Forums
08: Home
09: Member Screenshots
10: Home
11: Community Forums
12: Home
13: Community Forums
14: Community Forums
15: Community Forums
16: Home
17: Home
18: Photo Gallery
19: Community Forums
20: Home
21: Home
22: Member Screenshots
23: Community Forums
24: Home
25: Community Forums
26: Community Forums
27: Community Forums
28: Statistics
29: Home
30: Home
31: Home
32: Community Forums
33: Community Forums
34: Home
35: Home
36: Community Forums
37: Home
38: Community Forums
39: Photo Gallery
40: Downloads
41: Community Forums
42: Community Forums
43: Community Forums
44: Home
45: Community Forums
46: Photo Gallery
47: Community Forums
48: Community Forums
49: Photo Gallery
50: Community Forums
51: Home
52: Home
53: Community Forums
54: Photo Gallery
55: Home
56: Photo Gallery
57: Community Forums
58: Photo Gallery
59: Community Forums
60: Downloads
61: Home
62: Community Forums
63: Community Forums
64: Community Forums
65: Downloads
66: News
67: Member Screenshots
68: Community Forums
69: Home
70: Community Forums
71: Community Forums
72: Home
73: Community Forums
74: Photo Gallery
75: Home
76: Home
77: Community Forums
78: Home
79: Home
80: Home
81: Home
82: Home
83: Supporters
84: Home
85: Home
86: Photo Gallery
87: Home
88: Home
89: Community Forums
90: Photo Gallery
91: Community Forums
92: Community Forums
93: Community Forums
94: Community Forums
95: Downloads
96: Downloads
97: Home
98: Home
99: Community Forums
100: Home
101: Home
102: Community Forums
103: Community Forums
104: Community Forums
105: Home
106: Home
107: Home
108: Home
109: Community Forums
110: Home
111: Community Forums
112: Home
113: Community Forums
114: Community Forums
115: Community Forums
116: Community Forums
117: Community Forums
118: Home
119: Photo Gallery
120: Community Forums
121: Home
122: Community Forums
123: Home
124: Home
125: Home
126: Community Forums
127: Home
128: Community Forums
129: Downloads
130: Community Forums
131: Community Forums
132: Community Forums
133: Community Forums
134: Community Forums
135: Home
136: Downloads
137: Community Forums
138: Community Forums
139: Community Forums
140: Home
141: Community Forums
142: News Archive
143: Community Forums
144: Community Forums
145: Home
146: Home
147: Photo Gallery
148: Community Forums
149: Community Forums
150: Home
151: Home
152: Your Account
153: Community Forums
154: Community Forums
155: Home
156: Community Forums
157: Community Forums
158: Community Forums
159: Community Forums
160: Home
161: Home
162: Community Forums
163: News Archive
164: Community Forums
165: Home
166: Community Forums
167: Home
168: Community Forums
169: Home
170: Community Forums
171: Community Forums
172: Community Forums
173: Community Forums
174: Community Forums
175: Community Forums
176: Home
177: Community Forums
178: Photo Gallery
179: Home
180: Photo Gallery
181: Home
182: Home
183: Community Forums
184: Home
185: Community Forums
186: Community Forums
187: Community Forums
188: Community Forums
189: Statistics
190: Community Forums
191: Home
192: News
193: Community Forums
194: Member Screenshots
195: Home
196: Community Forums
197: Home
198: Home
199: Community Forums
200: Community Forums
201: Home
202: Community Forums
203: Community Forums

Staff Online:

No staff members are online!
Somewhat OT- OK, THIS is different for 106's.....
The AFV ASSOCIATION was formed in 1964 to support the thoughts and research of all those interested in Armored Fighting Vehicles and related topics, such as AFV drawings. The emphasis has always been on sharing information and communicating with other members of similar interests; e.g. German armor, Japanese AFVs, or whatever.
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page     Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board

View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Doug_Kibbey
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 4678
Location: The Great Satan
PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 2:15 am
Post subject: Somewhat OT- OK, THIS is different for 106's.....

Shocked



"This is one of two Cavalier Mustangs delivered to the US Army for use as chase-planes in the AH-56 "Cheyenne" attack helicopter project. The serial is 68-15796. (After conversion from that role) After the AH-56A project had been dropped, the Army Cavaliers were looking for a new job and soon were sent to NAS China Lake, where they were used in 106 mm recoilless rifle tests. Seen here with this weapon attached at the wing-tips is 68-15796, photographed 20th June 1974 (Official US Navy photograph)."

See the whole site for more on interesting conversions.

www.swissmustangs.ch/32128.html
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website Photo Gallery
Roy_A_Lingle
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 1997
Location: El Paso & Ft Bliss, Texas
PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 5:22 am
Post subject: Re: Somewhat OT- OK, THIS is different for 106's.....

Hi Doug! Hi Folks!

I wonder what they were testing? Air to ground, tank buster or air to air intercepter?
I loved the Cavalier rebuilds, would love to have been able to buy one.

Very odd.
Sgt, Scouts Out!

_________________
"You can never have too much reconnaissance."
General G.S. Patton Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 10:45 am
Post subject: Re: Somewhat OT- OK, THIS is different for 106's.....

Well China Lake is primarily a Naval weapons test site and the photo is credited to a Navy petty officer.

I wonder how the forward airspeed would affect the Venturi effect that makes teh RR 'recoilless'? Since the gas being vented out the back relies on the resistence of the still air behind the gun to provide the counterforce for the fired projectile the forward movement of the gun (creating a lower pressure are behind the breech) may affect the general operation of the weapon. Maybe this was just a test rig to some basic testing

For example if you used a RR at very high altitudes as an 'anti satellite weapon' what affect would the low atmospheric pressure on operation?

Just thinking at the edge of the box

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 11:00 am
Post subject: Re: Somewhat OT- OK, THIS is different for 106's.....

Ahem...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...pacecraft)

www.astronautix.com/cr...aeptor.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...105#Uragan

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
bsmart
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Posts: 2523
Location: Central Maryland
PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 1:08 pm
Post subject: Re: Somewhat OT- OK, THIS is different for 106's.....

But think of the time frame. This is a little earlier. I remember the first 'Antisatelite' that was deployed with the 48 FIS at Langley. The idea was to launch an F-15 that would make a zoom climb as high as possible then (just as it is running out of momemtum and air to hold it up) launch a rocket propelled vehicle that would continue to climb up and hit the satelite. Everything had to be timed just perfect. I could see a program using some type of ballistic weapon being explored to act as an alternative to the laser systems (Which were somehat speculative at the time). This could be a testbed that could gather data at specified speeds and altitudes to allow extrapolation to further extremes

_________________
Bob Smart ([email protected])
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail
Neil_Baumgardner
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: 3942
Location: Arlington, VA
PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 1:46 pm
Post subject: Re: Somewhat OT- OK, THIS is different for 106's.....

I was just pointing out that recoilless weapons have previously been used/considered for such applications - I guess that was already your train of reasoning...

Neil
Back to top
View user's profile
SHAWN
Power User

Offline Offline
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Posts: 484

PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 11:26 pm
Post subject: Re: Somewhat OT- OK, THIS is different for 106's.....

yes, but think, there is the poor airman who has the task of in-flight reloading....
Back to top
View user's profile Photo Gallery
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    Reply to topic    Printer Friendly Page    Forum Index ›  AFV News Discussion Board
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 6 Hours



Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum